Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
Threads and posts subject to the discretion of the moderators in this category.

Moderators: Connect Dots

TOPIC: Germ Theory Is Wrong and Harmful

Germ Theory Is Wrong and Harmful 07 Sep 2021 03:44 #61

  • I AM ALL I AM
  • I AM ALL I AM's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 2476
  • Likes received: 758
Connect Dots wrote:
I AM ALL I AM wrote:
G'day Connect Dots.

Thank you for the collection of all of this information
. :thumbup:

Thanks for your reply!

. . . it is likely that what he saw under the microscope were in fact red or white blood cells and not the plague agent itself.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germ_theory_of_disease
That is interesting.

I think the most fascinating discovery under a microscope is Antoine Bechamp's observation in the 19th century of what he called "microzymas," which then morph into various microbes in the process called pleomorphism due to the state of the terrain they're in. When the terrain changes, the microbes revert back to microzymas, which are indestructible in nature.

G'day Connect Dots.

You are welcome. :thumbup:

When doctors don't have a diagnosis they use their 'get out of jail free' card ... "it must have been a virus!!!" :roll:

I found out the truth of this in 1976 at 7 years when I was in hospital. When I questioned 'Germ Theory' in science (high school) and why we are being taught theories instead of facts, I was dismissed and questioned as to whether I held religious beliefs ... :shemused:

Surely, common sense and logic dictates that the probability of any 'theory' being true declines the longer it has not been shown to be true ... you'd think. Yet obviously the quote of Joseph Geobbels ...
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
... explains the current belief in the covid mythology.

"Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it."
George Santayana

Politicians lie and pharmaceutical companies ... well, here's a little bit on Bayer, once part of I.G. Farben chemical company prosecuted for war crimes at the Nuremberg trials .. oh, and surprise, surprise, it's an MSM report :O ...

... so who is lining up for a politically promoted Bayer vaccination?

We know who ... not us !!! ;) :D
You cannot reason someone out of a position that they didn't reason themselves into.

When paired opposites define your beliefs, your beliefs will imprison you.


Flare = Censor & Promoter of Bishop Williamson

truth-zone.net/forum/research-zone-forum-feedback-and-faq/73338-flare-censor-promoter-of-bishop-williamson.html#357334
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Connect Dots

Germ Theory Is Wrong and Harmful 08 Sep 2021 14:18 #62

  • Connect Dots
  • Connect Dots's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • 9/11 Truth woke me up.
  • Posts: 1295
  • Likes received: 268
Connect Dots wrote:
Dr Lorraine Day - Virus & Germ Theory Is Just That

Jun 25, 2020

Beaf Supreme




YouTube link



Shout it from the rooftops!

Watch this more than once, because it takes a lot to overcome the programming we've had since birth that germs cause disease.

It's the other way around—disease causes germs.

Besides serving as a clean-up crew, germs also help us with digestion.

They're our friends.

:thumbup:
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Germ Theory Is Wrong and Harmful 21 Sep 2021 06:06 #63

  • Connect Dots
  • Connect Dots's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • 9/11 Truth woke me up.
  • Posts: 1295
  • Likes received: 268
In the following article I've used color to try to make the train of thought clearer:

The failure to prove the virus exists

by Jon Rappoport

September 20, 2021


Over a year ago, I proposed (insisted on) a procedure to prove SARS-COV-2 exists.

This procedure is essential—and needless to say, it hasn’t been done, and will never be done.

Why? Because the outcome could completely and utterly destroy the COVID narrative.

Here is the procedure: You line up 500 people who have been diagnosed with COVID-19, and you take tissue samples from them.

You properly process these samples, through centrifuging, etc., in order to extract and arrive at what you believe is the virus.

You put that material under an electron microscope and photograph it.

You then place the 500 photos from the 500 “pandemic patients” side by side.

You ask yourself three burning questions.

One: In each and every photo, are there many identical viruses?

Two: Are these viruses in every one of the 500 photos?

Three: Is the virus one you’ve never seen before?

If the answer to question one and two is yes, you appear to have found a common virus for the 500 patients. If the answer to three is yes, it’s a virus never seen before.

If the answer to either question one or two is no, you’ve failed to find the common virus you’re looking for. You’ve failed to prove a viral cause for what you’re calling COVID-19.

If you see many identical virus particles in some, but not all, of the photos, you may or may not have found a virus. To decide that issue, you need three conditions: the researchers are honest and independent; a new team of such researchers will repeat the whole procedure, from the beginning, to see whether their findings match those of the original team; and you need truly qualified experts to determine whether the particles in the electron microscope photos are actually viruses or something else.

Note: This is why one or two photos from a study mean NOTHING.

All right. Moving on, there are other factors involved in the process of discovering a virus. These factors are ISOLATION and GENETIC SEQUENCING.

They’re both covered in a Statement on Virus Isolation, authored and published by Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Dr. Tom Cowan, and Sally Fallon Morell. I reprint it here in full:

....................................................................................................................................................................................

Statement On Virus Isolation (SOVI) [1]

“Isolation: The action of isolating; the fact or condition of being isolated or standing alone; separation from other things or persons; solitariness.” — Oxford English Dictionary

The controversy over whether the SARS-CoV-2 virus has ever been isolated or purified continues. However, using the above definition, common sense, the laws of logic and the dictates of science, any unbiased person must come to the conclusion that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has never been isolated or purified. As a result, no confirmation of the virus’ existence can be found. The logical, common sense, and scientific consequences of this fact are:

* the structure and composition of something not shown to exist can’t be known, including the presence, structure, and function of any hypothetical spike or other proteins;

* the genetic sequence of something that has never been found can’t be known;

* “variants” of something that hasn’t been shown to exist can’t be known;

* it’s impossible to demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 causes a disease called Covid-19.

In as concise terms as possible, here’s the proper way to isolate, characterize and demonstrate a new virus. First, one takes samples (blood, sputum, secretions) from many people (e.g. 500) with symptoms which are unique and specific enough to characterize an illness. Without mixing these samples with ANY tissue or products that also contain genetic material, the virologist macerates, filters and ultracentrifuges i.e. purifies the specimen. This common virology technique, done for decades to isolate bacteriophages [2a] and so-called giant viruses in every virology lab, then allows the virologist to demonstrate with electron microscopy thousands of identically sized and shaped particles. These particles are the isolated and purified virus.

These identical particles are then checked for uniformity by physical and/or microscopic techniques. Once the purity is determined, the particles may be further characterized. This would include examining the structure, morphology, and chemical composition of the particles. Next, their genetic makeup is characterized by extracting the genetic material directly from the purified particles and using genetic-sequencing techniques, such as Sanger sequencing, that have also been around for decades. Then one does an analysis to confirm that these uniform particles are exogenous (outside) in origin as a virus is conceptualized to be, and not the normal breakdown products of dead and dying tissues. [2b] (As of May 2020, we know that virologists have no way to determine whether the particles they’re seeing are viruses or just normal break-down products of dead and dying tissues.) [2c]

If we have come this far then we have fully isolated, characterized, and genetically sequenced an exogenous virus particle. However, we still have to show it is causally related to a disease. This is carried out by exposing a group of healthy subjects (animals are usually used) to this isolated, purified virus in the manner in which the disease is thought to be transmitted. If the animals get sick with the same disease, as confirmed by clinical and autopsy findings, one has now shown that the virus actually causes a disease. This demonstrates infectivity and transmission of an infectious agent.

None of these steps has even been attempted with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, nor have all these steps been successfully performed for any so-called pathogenic virus. Our research indicates that a single study showing these steps does not exist in the medical literature.

Instead, since 1954, virologists have taken unpurified samples from a relatively few people, often less than ten, with a similar disease. They then minimally process this sample and inoculate this unpurified sample onto tissue culture containing usually four to six other types of material — all of which contain identical genetic material as to what is called a “virus.” The tissue culture is starved and poisoned and naturally disintegrates into many types of particles, some of which contain genetic material. Against all common sense, logic, use of the English language and scientific integrity, this process is called “virus isolation.” This brew containing fragments of genetic material from many sources is then subjected to genetic analysis, which then creates in a computer-simulation process the alleged sequence of the alleged virus, a so called in silico genome. At no time is an actual virus confirmed by electron microscopy. At no time is a genome extracted and sequenced from an actual virus. This is scientific fraud.

The observation that the unpurified specimen — inoculated onto tissue culture along with toxic antibiotics, bovine fetal tissue, amniotic fluid and other tissues — destroys the kidney tissue onto which it is inoculated is given as evidence of the virus’ existence and pathogenicity. This is scientific fraud.

From now on, when anyone gives you a paper that suggests the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been isolated, please check the methods sections. If the researchers used Vero cells or any other culture method, you know that their process was not isolation. You will hear the following excuses for why actual isolation isn’t done:

1. There were not enough virus particles found in samples from patients to analyze.

2. Viruses are intracellular parasites; they can’t be found outside the cell in this manner.

If No. 1 is correct, and we can’t find the virus in the sputum of sick people, then on what evidence do we think the virus is dangerous or even lethal? If No. 2 is correct, then how is the virus spread from person to person? We are told it emerges from the cell to infect others. Then why isn’t it possible to find it?

Finally, questioning these virology techniques and conclusions is not some distraction or divisive issue. Shining the light on this truth is essential to stop this terrible fraud that humanity is confronting. For, as we now know, if the virus has never been isolated, sequenced or shown to cause illness, if the virus is imaginary, then why are we wearing masks, social distancing and putting the whole world into prison?

Finally, if pathogenic viruses don’t exist, then what is going into those injectable devices erroneously called “vaccines,” and what is their purpose? This scientific question is the most urgent and relevant one of our time.

We are correct. The SARS-CoV2 virus does not exist.

—end of Kaufman, Cowan, Morell Statement— . . .

blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/09/20/the-failure-to-prove-the-virus-exists/

:aargh:

Jon Rappoport has to keep repeating himself over and over and over again because we are all so indoctrinated, that's what it takes.

And the stakes are so high!

:facepalm:
Last Edit: 21 Sep 2021 06:12 by Connect Dots. Reason: Format
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Related topics

Topic subjectRelevanceDate of latest post
The Fraud of Germ Theory13.85Sunday, 09 June 2019
DETOX FROM HARMFUL VACCINES7.79Saturday, 05 December 2020
US rice imports 'contain harmful levels of lead'7.62Monday, 15 April 2013
Is there something wrong ...6.14Wednesday, 03 May 2017
What did we get right and wrong with the SZ and what would you like changed6.08Sunday, 15 May 2016
So where did Physics go wrong?6.08Tuesday, 07 July 2015
Something wrong with the New Testament6.08Sunday, 02 November 2014
Tell Me. Are These Things Wrong?6.08Thursday, 09 September 2021
When Right vs Left is Right vs Wrong6.08Monday, 19 November 2018
What is Wrong With Our Culture...6.08Wednesday, 18 December 2013
Moderators: Connect Dots
Powered by Kunena Forum

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2020 - May 2021, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 250 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 192 - Raised
( £ 140 GBP )
donation thermometer
56%
Most Recent Donation $122 USD
4th January 2021
Bitcoin Address: bc1q0kazqya0nurfxtunxv807vm0m8852nnrrk8mj8
 
Ethereum Address: 0xe69915c80dd75df19f438d556267e04f932f057d
 
More Info: Donation options for TZ
 

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.