TOPIC: REQUEST FOR RESEARCH THREADS WITH SEPARATE COMMENTS THREADS

Gaia wrote:
First, New York is a very alive and very noisy city where you hear this all day long on the streets:



Second, the people are standing in between a concrete jungle of huge skyscrapers there in the financial district, which probably blocks the sound of an incoming plane drastically untill it's right on top.

Third, you can see the man react within a second after impact.

So all in all, it's a perfect and normal response for a human being. Nothing 'noticable or strange' what you guys think to have found there.

PFIZIPFEI wrote:
Case in point : You still believe that video does not show a convex horizon

Flare wrote:
The tag ' inside job ' has hit the mass consciousness but they don't know what it means but I say what the result is -


Wesley says he's told " it seems like all they've got is a hammer , so everything's a nail ' ( or something to that effect ) I say - that this 'nail' are countries non compliance with the IMF / World Bank / ( the Economic Hitman ) or challenging the $ ( Saddam / Gaddafi ) .
15 yrs war, futures looking bleak - peeps don;t think I quite such a loon ( it's depopulation most peeps don't ( won't )grasp - vaccinations, geo-engineering, transhumanism , the list is endless but catching on to the need for organics.

But back to your point - yes , I'll say there were No planes that 'Engineers ( and Aviators ) for 911' state that to hit the towers is almost impossible and totally so for a beginner , that a controlled demolition didn;t require planes, Silverstein's 6.3B insurance fraud , market options - the stand down , that the towers were basically empty means complicity .

Framing it today esp, the ' displacement / replacement ' in Europe or that Afganistan wasn't producing enough illicit heroin under the Taliban so we had to go in and get it going again , that a whole continent is in rubble .

What peeps don't want to hear is, Mossad was involved , that we're living under a jewish zionist global enslavement Agenda , most will never understand cultural marxism .....Yuri Bezmenov is beyond them. - never heard of AIPAC or the Trilateral - think they know it all if they've heard of the Bilderburg's -

But the sheople are stirring - they know somethings' up but the horse in out of the barn - we'll have Riders on the Storm now.

No No No. You are being disingenuous. You claimed you did not SEE any curved horizon, not that you did not BELIEVE it. Shall I reference the relevant post(s)?

What peeps don't want to hear is, Mossad was involved , that we're living under a jewish zionist global enslavement Agenda

Exorcist wrote:
Exactly. The flimsy wings and fuselage would shred. The 4.4 tonne engines (the left one allegedly morphing into the massive 95th floor) would break off the wings and fall down the façade. Planes are not made of diamond and do not stay intact when experiencing any impact.

^^ Finally someone talking some sense regarding the impact of the plane into the building.

You 'no planers' seem to think a boeing 757 is made of cotton-candy and would have just crushed on impact against the thin steel outer layer.

That's absolute nonsense of course, since that plane weighs approx. 100.000 kgs and comes in with a speed of approx 500 miles per fucking hour!
Do you guys realize how much FORCE that must have been for those small steel beams to 'cut' through?! Of course that plane went through it like a hot knife through butter.

Jeez...

Flare wrote:
Would you expect a similar penetration if the WTC, travelling at 500mph, hit a stationary aircraft?

@ Flare
Don't "group" me with "you Guys". I'm completely independent.
So F**k Off Troll (in the nicest possible way to maintain the high standards of TZ politeness!).....

rodin wrote:
Yes.

It's basically the same if one gets stabbed by a knife, or runs into a knife with the same force as being stabbed.
(kind of a gruesome comparison, but I think you understand what I'm saying)

So yes, penetration of the WTC would definately occur.

Flare wrote:
at least your physics is sound on that. I think most would see though that we do not have a knife and flesh situation, we have 2 hard objects (with some weak points) smashing into each other. It can be argued that plane is weaker, as the building was not designed so light it can fly....

To every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

I didn't see ANY "reaction"

I didn't see ANY "reaction"

But are you a no planer or not?