TOPIC: The Anthropogenic Global Warming Scam - biggest of all

This topic is about the biggest scam of all time, both in terms of money and in terms of global coverage (whole Earth), the Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) scam.

Please note: this topic is not to discuss the fact of the matter and pro-AGW shill posts will be deleted or moved when I see fit. No point in trying.

The theme is the idea that humans, and as a result human behaviour, has changed the "global climate"* and that there are measures needed to counter this.

No matter how we think about Hitler, the shape of the Earth, or the existence of "White Genocide", one thing that binds us all is this Ring of Ridiculous Antiscience, that is "Global" "Warming" caused by "Humans".

In all pride I can say it is the only grand scam/hoax/theme I never believed in and that has a lot to do with my educational background.

The Scientific scam

- the AGW proponents say that "the global climate is changing" and that "humans are to blame"
- the "peer-reviewed" articles say that this is a fact
- any opposition to this idea is "countered" with "you're a shill for the petroleum industry" or worse; a ridiculous accusation, as the oil companies, giant ExxonMobil upfront, are completely aligned (and tax exempted) with this scam - corporate.exxonmobil.com/en/company/news-and-updates/speeches/strengthening-global-energy-security
- how wrong was Al Gore in 2006? - wattsupwiththat.com/2016/01/02/24-days-to-al-gores-10-years-to-save-the-planet-and-point-of-no-return-planetary-emergency-deadline/

The Social scam

- AGW has been presented in the MSM (Main Stream Media) for years now
- AGW is pushed onto innocent school children with the infamous case of a mandatory session of Al Gore's scamdalous show An Inconvenient Truth in schools around the world, and especially in Britain
- many many people without any knowledge or insights in this matter take this for granted and/or propagandise the topic as "useful" idiots

The Economic scam

- there is no business in the world as "valuable" as this AGW scam; even arms, drugs and people trade are dwarfed by the "carbon credit" ponzi scheme; The United States will be home to a $1 trillion carbon emission market by 2020 - www.sciencecodex.com/1_trillion_us_carbon_trading_market_by_2020_study
- policies are drafted and put into action everyday to get us, mere goyim humans, to pay taxes for this idea
- as it is global, it affects everyone, no matter where you live or are traveling to

The Political scam

- the AGW scandal is used to get countries to comply with "rules" and "regulations" put into place by a select Elite who thinks they can rule the world
- the AGW scam is used for the idea of "World Government". Although the source and propagator of this is questionable; Alex Jones, the arguments he puts forward are not ridiculous
- even if most of the people working in the corrupt "business" of politics are "sheeple" (i.e.; believers of a scam without investigating or questioning, but a mere tool for those Elites), the effect on the people is disastrous

Background information

There are a couple of videos which I want to bring to your attention. You may have seen them, or not, but they (can) help you in understanding the extent of this scam and the way the shills for this scheme are operating:



The Great Global Warming Swindle - most extensive "mainstream" anti-AGW docu



Idem, for dummies



Excellent speech by a geologist (!)



Excellent rebuttal of AGW by a geologist in US Congress




Lord Monckton is a bit of a character and I do not trust his motives fully but the content of his speeches is what it's about...



www.youtube.com/user/stefbot/search?query=climate+change

More opponents against this scam

Other "Global Warming" topics on TruthZone

- Mini Ice Age coming: the global warming shills forget to think about the Sun - started by Orangeaid
- It’s official: no global warming for 18 years 1 month - started by novum
- More Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims - started by novum
- politicians being used to solve global warming - started by jonb
- An Interesting Site - GeoEngineering Exposed: Global Warming linked to Advanced Climate Modification Technology - started by novum

Discussion
- this topic is NOT a start for discussion about "is it happening or not?". It is not and the videos should have pointed into that direction
- this topic is meant for informational purposes; share videos, links, texts, publications that didn't pass the shilled "peer-review" process and other useful information to understand this topic

================================

* the whole root of the idea is false; there is no "global climate", there has never been and there will never be a "global climate". Climate is regional to local to even very local (microclimates). That microclimates are changed by human behaviour is clear and not the point of the debate; urbanisation effects, the drainage of rivers and lakes and local policies (e.g. deforestation) have altered the climate on micro-scale. The issue is Global Climate (change), which is a non-existing theme.

Goldman Sachs website today:

www.goldmansachs.com/citizenship/environmental-stewardship/market-solutions-to-address-climate-change/

What it said a couple of years ago....

We act as a market maker in emissions and other environmental commodities, and look for ways to play a constructive role in promoting the development of these markets.

www.goldmansachs.com/citizenship/environmental-stewardship-and-sustainability/environmental-markets/financing-and-investing-for-the-environment.html

act, role, make, promote.... right there in plain sight.

The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever

When future generations look back on the global-warming scare of the past 30 years, nothing will shock them more than the extent to which the official temperature records – on which the entire panic ultimately rested – were systematically “adjusted” to show the Earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified.

Two weeks ago, under the headline “How we are being tricked by flawed data on global warming”, I wrote about Paul Homewood, who, on his Notalotofpeopleknowthat blog, had checked the published temperature graphs for three weather stations in Paraguay against the temperatures that had originally been recorded. In each instance, the actual trend of 60 years of data had been dramatically reversed, so that a cooling trend was changed to one that showed a marked warming.

This was only the latest of many examples of a practice long recognised by expert observers around the world – one that raises an ever larger question mark over the entire official surface-temperature record.

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/globalwarming/11395516/The-fiddling-with-temperature-data-is-the-biggest-science-scandal-ever.html

The Australian Bureau of Meteorology has been caught red-handed manipulating temperature data to show “global warming” where none actually exists.


At Amberley, Queensland, for example, the data at a weather station showing 1 degree Celsius cooling per century was “homogenized” (adjusted) by the Bureau so that it instead showed a 2.5 degrees warming per century.

At Rutherglen, Victoria, a cooling trend of -0.35 degrees C per century was magically transformed at the stroke of an Australian meteorologist’s pen into a warming trend of 1.73 degrees C per century.

Last year, the Australian Bureau of Meteorology made headlines in the liberal media by claiming that 2013 was Australia’s hottest year on record. This prompted Australia’s alarmist-in-chief Tim Flannery – an English literature graduate who later went on to earn his scientific credentials with a PhD in palaeontology, digging up ancient kangaroo bones – to observe that global warming in Australia was “like climate change on steroids.”

But we now know, thanks to research by Australian scientist Jennifer Marohasy, that the hysteria this story generated was based on fabrications and lies.

Though the Bureau of Meteorology has insisted its data adjustments are “robust”, it has been unable to come up with a credible explanation as to why it translated real-world data showing a cooling trend into homogenized data showing a warming trend.

She wrote:

This is a global problem. Earlier this year, Breitbart reported that similarly dishonest adjustments had been made to temperature records by NASA and NOAA. Similarly implicated are the UK temperature records of the Met Office Hadley Centre and at Phil “Climategate” Jones’s disgraced Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia.

One of the many disingenuous arguments used by climate alarmists against sceptics is mockingly to accuse them of being conspiracy theorists. “How could global warming possibly not be a problem when all the world’s temperature data sets from Australia to the US to the UK clearly show that it is? Are you seriously suggesting that so many different scientists and so many distinguished institutions from across the globe would collude in such a massive lie?” their argument runs.

Our answer: yes we bloody well are.

www.breitbart.com/london/2014/08/25/australian-bureau-of-meteorology-accused-of-criminally-adjusted-global-warming/

Rothschild and E3 to take the lead in the global carbon trading market

N M Rothschild & Sons has been at the centre of the world's financial markets for more 200 years. Today, the firm is a global investment bank, which provides independent and quality advice to governments, corporations and individuals worldwide through a network of professionals in 40 offices across more than 30 countries. The firm employs 2,500 employees worldwide.

SOURCE N M Rothschild and Sons

www.prnewswire.co.uk/news-releases/rothschild-australia-and-e3-international-to-take-the-lead-in-the-global-carbon-trading-market-154464275.html

I have no doubt about geo-engineering / weather manipulation - that they create floods , droughts , earthquakes ect, that's used to make the sheep believe the Earth is under threat of Warming / Cooling - they'll change the plot and the data whenever it suits them .
They geo-engineer too move ( remove ) people and planting to suit a desired result - like forcing out traditional farming and stressing out communities and using it as any excuse - as we've seen even war in Syria , wholesale vaccination programs ect.
In the end the main goal is the global carbon tax scam - all sides China + USA are on board , as it's set up to facilitate the decline of the west and set up China as the worlds' global factory ....All coming along in tandem with the one world basket of currencies .
To tax the whole world for the next 100yrs or more , if the TTP / TTIP are dragging their feet , once done and it will be one day , along with this - kiss your ass goodbye but not to planet Earth - just health, safety , societal cohesion , a decent living standard. Unless there's a total rebellion.

Carbon credit trade ponzi schemes dwarf all of them, even NASA, weapons, and drugs. Combined.

It's a "market" where literally air is traded. Air we exhale every second.

It really blows every imagination, that this hoax could be pulled off.

www.climatetrust.org/a-2016-carbon-market-forecast/

www.climatebonds.net/





It is insane.



1 trillion 1 dollar bills would make a pile 1/4th of the distance Earth-Moon.

The alleged "total carbon bond market" is 100 trillion dollars. So stacking that all in 1 dollar bills, would take you 13 times to the Moon. And 12 times back.

Even Alan Bean is flabbergasted about it.

Another kick in the teeth for climate change advocates

"As world leaders, namely in the European Union, attack President Trump for pulling out of the Paris Climate Agreement which would have saddled Americans with billions upon billions of dollars in debt and economic losses, a new bombshell report that analyzed Global Average Surface Temperature (GAST) data produced by NASA, the NOAA and HADLEY proves the President was right on target with his refusal to be a part of the new initiative.

According to the report, which has been peer reviewed by administrators, scientists and researchers from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.), and several of America’s leading universities, the data is completely bunk..."

www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-15/research-team-slams-global-warming-data-new-report-not-reality-totally-inconsistent-

The criminal charlatan exposed:

In February 2007, the day after his panicky global warming film "An Inconvenient Truth" won an Academy Award for best documentary, a shocking report based on public records revealed that Al Gore's Nashville home consumed 20 times more electricity than the average American household.

Facing scrutiny for his extreme electricity consumption, the former vice president pledged to renovate his home to become greener and more energy-efficient. The extensive and expensive overhaul of Gore's house included installing solar panels and geothermal heating.

In order to determine the effectiveness of the environmentally-friendly remodel and learn whether the self-appointed spokesman of the environmental movement has amended his energy-devouring ways, the National Center for Public Policy Research obtained Gore's electricity usage information through public records requests and conversations with the Nashville Electric Service (NES).

In powering his home, Gore still greatly outpaces most Americans in energy consumption. The findings were shocking:

• The past year, Gore's home energy use averaged 19,241 kilowatt hours (kWh) every month, compared to the U.S. household average of 901 kWh per month.

• Gore guzzles more electricity in one year than the average American family uses in 21 years.

• In September of 2016, Gore's home consumed 30,993 kWh in just one month – as much energy as a typical American family burns in 34 months.

• During the last 12 months, Gore devoured 66,159 kWh of electricity just heating his pool. That is enough energy to power six average U.S. households for a year.

• From August 2016 through July 2017, Gore spent almost $22,000 on electricity bills.

• Gore paid an estimated $60,000 to install 33 solar panels. Those solar panels produce an average of 1,092 kWh per month, only 5.7% of Gore's typical monthly energy consumption.

No matter how the numbers are viewed, Al Gore uses vastly more electricity at his home than the average American – a particularly inconvenient truth given his hypocritical calls for all Americans to reduce their home energy use.

www.nationalcenter.org/NPA679.html

Yep i read that elsewhere yesterday, seems the info is out all over the place.

WTF is he doing in those places, growing buds?

Seriously though, he doesnt just have one mansion.

"Do as i say not as i do" .. but its ok, he prints out credits at Goldman Sachs, theyve been so good to him over the years... even democrat donations wise.

Gaia wrote:
This isn't the biggest scam of all time.

The Holocaust hoax is the biggest scam by far.
After that comes Usury.
After that comes the Diversity scam.
After that comes the 9-11 scam.
After that comes the Pearl Harbor scam, dragging the US into WW II.
Then comes the Global warming hoax.

novum wrote:


CRM114 . . . _ _ _ . . . Jul 16, 2017 5:03 AM
Not the same Powers (that's official, I am a physicist ).
Example: election victories are usually bought, with the ground game being a factor. Power = money x time
Here's one for you:
Getting the girl is a product of the time and money invested in courting her
Girls = time x money.
However time is money, so
Girls = money^2
However, money is the root of all evil
money = SQR(Evil)
so money^2 = Evil
Therefore;
Girls = Evil !



. . . _ _ _ . . . CRM114 Jul 16, 2017 5:30 AM
I understand the differences, it is a play on words. Mathematical laws cannot be imposed on linguistic constructs.
Nevertheless, it illustrates my point.
A broader base makes for a taller tower, the exception being focused like a laser beam.
If a PhD is like a laser and a three Bachelor's degrees are like a pyramid, the laser will reach further, but the pyramid will have more volume.
A PhD will earn more than someone with three bachelor's degrees, but who knows more (if such a concept is even quantifiable,) generally speaking? That is the point I was making.
lol @ evil girls
Q: What's the difference between a slut and a bitch?
A: A slut will sleep with anyone. A bitch will sleep with anyone but you.



CRM114 . . . _ _ _ . . . Jul 16, 2017 7:42 AM
There's also a balancing boys calculation
Boys define themselves by power over other boys
Boys = Power / Boys
Therefore
Boys^2 = Power
But absolute power leads to absolute corruption
absolute power = absolute corruption
Canceling
power = corruption
Therefore
Boys^2 = corruption
and so
Boys = Root(Corruption)
So, since boys are the root of all corruption, Girls may be evil,
But It's All The Boys' Fault.


lmao at these three comments (comments Page 3) on the AGW thread you linked to......

Global Warming

By John Coleman

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

It is the greatest scam in history. I am amazed, appalled and highly offended by it. Global Warming; It is a SCAM.

Some dastardly scientists with environmental and political motives manipulated long term scientific data back in the late 1990's to create an allusion of rapid global warming. Other scientists of the same environmental wacko type jumped into the circle to support and broaden the "research" to further enhance the totally slanted, bogus global warming claims. Their friends in government steered huge research grants their way to keep the movement going. Soon they claimed to be a consensus.

Environmental extremist, notable politicians among them then teamed up with movie, media and other liberal, environmentalist journalists to create this wild "scientific" scenario of the civilization threatening environmental consequences from Global Warming unless we adhere to their radical agenda.

Now their ridicules manipulated science has been accepted as fact and become a cornerstone issue for CNN, CBS, NBC, the Democratic Political Party, the Governor of California, school teachers and, in many cases, well informed but very gullible environmental conscientious citizens. Only one reporter at ABC has been allowed to counter the Global Warming frenzy with one 15 minutes documentary segment.

I do not oppose environmentalism. I do not oppose the political positions of either party.

However, Global Warming, i.e. Climate Change, is not about environmentalism or politics. It is not a religion. It is not something you "believe in." It is science; the science of meteorology. This is my field of life-long expertise. And I am telling you Global Warming is a nonevent, a manufactured crisis and a total scam. I say this knowing you probably won't believe me, a mere TV weatherman, challenging a Nobel Prize, Academy Award and Emmy Award winning former Vice President of United States. So be it.

I suspect you might like to say to me, "John, look the research that supports the case for global warming was done by research scientists; people with PH D's in Meteorology. They are employed by major universities and important research institutions. Their work has been reviewed by other scientists with PH D's. They have to know a lot more about it than you do. Come on, John, get with it. The experts say our pollution has created an strong and increasing greenhouse effect and a rapid, out of control global warming is underway that will sky rocket temperatures, destroy agriculture, melt the ice caps, flood the coastlines and end life as we know it. How can you dissent from this crisis? You must be a bit nutty.

Allow me, please, to explain how I think this all came about. Our universities have become somewhat isolated from the rest of us. There is a culture and attitudes and values and pressures on campus that are very different. I know this group well. My father and my older brother were both PHD-University types. I was raised in the university culture. Any person who spends a decade at a university obtaining a PHD in Meteorology and become a research scientist, more likely than not, becomes a part of that single minded culture. They all look askance at the rest of us, certain of their superiority. They respect government and disrespect business, particularly big business. They are environmentalists above all else.

And, there is something else. These scientists know that if they do research and results are in no way alarming, their research will gather dust on the shelf and their research careers will languish. But if they do research that sounds alarms, they will become well known and respected and receive scholarly awards and, very importantly, more research dollars will come flooding their way.

So when these researchers did climate change studies in the late 90's they were eager to produce findings that would be important and be widely noticed and trigger more research funding. It was easy for them to manipulate the data to come up with the results they wanted to make headlines and at the same time drive their environmental agendas. Then their like minded PHD colleagues reviewed their work and hastened to endorse it without question.

There were a few who didn't fit the mold. They did ask questions and raised objections. They did research with contradictory results. The environmental elitists berated them brushed their studies aside.

I have learned since the Ice Age is coming scare in the 1970's to always be a skeptic about research. In the case of global warming, I didn't accept media accounts. Instead I read dozens of the scientific papers. I have talked with numerous scientists. I have studied. I have thought about it. I know I am correct when I assure you there is no run away climate change. The impact of humans on climate is not catastrophic. Our planet is not in peril. It is all a scam, the result of bad science.

I am not alone in this assessment. There are hundreds of other meteorologists, many of them PH D's, who are as certain as I am that this global warming frenzy is based on bad science and is not valid.

I am incensed by the incredible media glamour, the politically correct silliness and rude dismal of counter arguments by the high priest of Global Warming.

In time, a decade or two, the outrageous scam will be obvious. As the temperature rises, polar ice cap melting, coastal flooding and super storm pattern all fail to occur as predicted everyone will come to realize we have been duped.

The sky is not falling. And, natural cycles and drifts in climate are as much if not more responsible for any climate changes underway.

I strongly believe that the next twenty years are equally as likely to see a cooling trend as they are to see a warming trend.

John Coleman (died January 20 this year) was the founder of the Weather Channel

Somewhat related.. well related, some of this money was for climate scams...

truth-zone.net/forum/government-and-authority/70202-fbi-investigating-millions-of-mishandled-dollars-funneled-from-australian-govt-to-clinton-foundation.html


A decade ago when australian politician puppets wanted to strip food producers of water rights and force them off their farms, citing climate change and using puppets like Tim Flannery to scare monger while giving him Australian of the Year awards (it will never rain much ever again or at all, etc, the rivers are going to dry)... i figured it was the clinton cabal (and the hidden hand behind them) pulling their strings, hence all the Aunty Lynn stuff etc (Hillarys bestest pal is involved in indian food production using cheap labour, so win win, carbon scams plus eliminate the competition)

These latest revelations are more evidence that the same hidden hand is behind these agendas, behind the takeover of Australias Murray Darlin Basin.

And the rivers did never dry, the alps and snow still do their thing, but the agenda remains to force people off the land and into the high rise matrix pods in the cities because of global warming sorry climate change.

A pulse of wintry weather has sent shivers across southeastern Australia during the last few days. So, just how cold did it get and how does this event compare to past years in Australia?

Some places experienced one of their coldest days of the last decade on the weekend.

In central NSW, Bathurst's top of 5.4 degrees on Sunday was its equal second lowest maximum temperature of the last 10 years.

South Australia's Port Augusta only reached 12.3 degrees on Sunday, which was its coldest day in six years and the coldest for June since the site opened in 2001. Oodnadatta Airport, which holds the record for Australia's highest temperature, dropped below zero degrees on Monday morning for the first time in four years.

In Queensland, Coolangatta registered its lowest temperature in 10 years on Monday morning, dipping to 0.6 degrees shortly before 5am. This was also the site's lowest June temperature in at least 27 years. Oakey's -4.9C was also a four-year low.

One of the most visually striking features of the cold weather during the last few days was snow. Elevated areas of Tasmania, Victoria, NSW and the ACT received a dusting, including the Brindabellas, Oberon Plateau, Blue Mountains, Barrington Tops and Cradle Mountain. There was even some snow as far north as Guyra on the Northern Tablelands in NSW by Monday morning.

Australia's alpine region experienced one of its best early-season snowfalls in decades during the last week.

Some of the main ski resorts have reported 70-90cm of fresh snow during the last week, most of which fell during the last four days.

A weather station at Perisher Valley, which sits just over 1,700 metres above sea level, registered 91mm of precipitation during the last five days. As the temperature was below freezing during most of this time, this translates to around 80cm of snow accumulation.

According to historical records at Mount Hotham, the 80cm that was measured on the ground there this morning is their best depth this early in the season for 18 years.

Snowy Hydro's weekly snow depth reading at Spencers Creek, which is located between Perisher and Thredbo was 76.4cm on Monday. This is the highest measured at the site this early in the season since 2000.

While this wasn't a record-breaking cold snap, it did cause colder weather than recent years in some areas and brought remarkably heavy early-season snow to the alps.

www.weatherzone.com.au/news/did-this-cold-snap-break-records/528057

I don't know if this has been posted but....lolz.
worldpropertyjournal.com/featured-columnists/celebrity-homes-column-al-gore-tipper-gore-oprah-winfrey-michael-douglas-christopher-lloyd-fred-couples-n...-moneymaker-2525.php


Al Gores beach side property.

Goldman Sachs just prints out carbon offsets for him, so its all good.

Sometimes Al gives a few to Dicaprio to offset all those jet flights.

Thanks Goldman Sachs!

Clearly he doesn't think sea levels will rise.