Your donations are appreciated and help keep this site running. Even the smallest amount helps.
Thankyou

 
PROMOTE YOUR SITE
HERE
Only $3 USD/month
TRUTHSPOON.COM
The man they can't recruit!
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: White Genocide

White Genocide 09 Jun 2014 16:06 #1

  • Seaic
  • Seaic's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Posts: 1915
  • Likes received: 2150
This thread is a serious thread, aiming to expose and discuss the ongoing plan to sabotage white countries with the ultimate goal of genocide of the white race, and how it is being achieved. It is not a hate thread. I believe all human races have the right to survive and protect their own way of life in their homelands, without molestation from others. Do you?

First of all I think it would be prudent to explain, in detailed terms, what exactly the white race is and who falls into it, to avoid any confusion or ambiguity. Below, I have taken a map and coloured Europe in blue ;



The terms "white" and "European" are, in this context, synonymous. Though there is some disagreement amongst scholars and anthropologists about particulars, it's broadly agreed that "white" means all white-skinned, non-Jewish people native to Europe and their descendants throughout the world, in the Americas, Australasia and southern Africa. Language and religion doesn't come into it ; I've seen arguments from some people who say groups like the Finns, Hungarians and Basques are not racially European, because they don't speak an Indo-European language. I've seen people who say Albanians and Bosnians aren't racially European, because they practice Islam. Linguistically and religiously, Finnish, Hungarian and Basque are not European languages, and Islam is not a European religion. By the same token, I've seen people claim Armenians, an Asiatic people, are racially European because they are Christians. All of these arguments don't hold much weight with me ; are English-speaking Christian Africans or Spanish-speaking Christian Amerindians racially European, because of their language and religion? Are Indians and Pakistanis, who do speak Indo-European languages, white? The answer to all of these questions is no, of course not.

The best and most concise definition I can offer you, then, is this ; people of exclusively native European ancestry. The white race does not include Jews, Turks, the Sami/Lapps, Roma gypsies, Armenians, Azeris, Kazakhs, Tatars, Chechen, Mexicans or Latin American mestizos. I am undecided whether Georgians, Maltese and Cypriots can be considered white. It does, however, include Greeks, Italians, Spaniards and every other Euro-Mediterranean group - to say otherwise is divisive, baseless, nefarious nonsense, designed to disassociate Northern Europeans from the glorious civilisations of Greece and Rome, and thus to denigrate them as little more than barbarian savages.

Now that is out of the way without getting bogged down in too much technical detail, I'll present to you my evidence that white people are on the way to extinction, if current trends continue.



Short and simple, here Vladimir Putin addresses the crux of the matter. Think what you like about Putin, at least he is openly acknowledging the problem. This also helps to dispel the notion that talk of white genocide is some sort of "far right fringe lunatic conspiracy theory" - this is the President of Russia, the world's 3rd most powerful country, recognising that white people are on the road to extinction!

So, what are the low and falling white birth rates he is talking about? Let's take a look at the 2013 CIA World Factbook country comparison by Birthrate ;

As you can see, you have to go all the way down to 113th to find the first majority white nation, Argentina, and that is highly skewed given the fact that Argentine mestizos have the highest birth rate there - the white Argentine population still has a low birth rate, in keeping with the low white average. You have to go down to 132nd to find the first European nation, Ireland.

Let's look specifically at some individual nations, and see how their white population is faring.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

This article shows that white births now account for less than half of all births in the United States. As if that wasn't a bad enough indicator for the future of the white race, this next article illustrates that, for the first time ever in US history, the white death rates outnumber the white birth rates. These two facts, combined with increasing mass immigration from non-white countries, means that if present trends continue white Americans will soon be a minority.

UNITED KINGDOM

A 2013 article highlights that in 2011, 31% of children born in the UK were born to one foreign parent. In the same year, it was shown that 18% of children born were born to two foreign parents, meaning altogether 49% of children born in the UK that year had foreign ancestry. Professor David Coleman, of Oxford University, said: "On current trends European populations will become more ethnically diverse, with the possibility that today's majority ethnic groups will no longer comprise a numerical majority." What he means, then, without all the politically correct euphemisms that he has to use, is that whites will be a minority in Britain before long. How long? 2066. Already, white British people are a minority at 45% in London, with another 15% being non-British whites. So, only 60% of London is white, according to the 2011 Census. Is that acceptable? Would it be acceptable if Abuja was 45% Nigerian, or would it be called out as genocide?

ITALY

According the Italian National Office of Statistics, the fertility rate of Italian women was 1.41 per head in 2009. This doesn't meet the 2.1 target needed just to replace the existing Italian population. Italy's fertility rate has been below replacements levels for over three decades now. By 2050, Italy will be a country with a birth rate that has been continuously below zero population growth for 75 years. Italy's birth rate in 1950 was almost twice its death rate. But the death rate equaled the birth rate in 1985, exceeds it today and will be approaching twice the birth rate by 2050. Italy is an aging country. Italians are dying out. By 2100, assuming present trends continue, Italy will no longer exist.

GREECE

Greece may seem an odd choice for this list, being relatively small, but seeing as European civilisation all traces back to Greece, and Greece has done more than any other to grow and defend that legacy, I thought it would be poignant to illustrate the Greek demographic crisis in a little depth. Greece has a dangerously low total fertility rate, well below replacement levels at 1.3. Greece also has a rapidly-aging population and a death rate that far outnumbers the birth rate (by 16,300) and because of the economic crisis Greeks are leaving in droves. This all means that in decades, Greece will cease to be a viable nation-state.

GERMANY

The 2011 fertility rate for Germany was just 1.36 per woman. Again, well below the 2.1 necessary just for replacement. Only 663,000 babies were born in Germany in 2011, the lowest in history - contrast this to the peak, in 1964 when German births (east and west) reached 1.4 million. That's over a 50% decrease in less than 50 years, and combined with mass immigration into Germany from Turkey, the wider Middle East and Africa, will mean that Germans will soon be a minority in Germany.

UKRAINE

The demographic decline in Ukraine is another tale of woe. Under the Soviets, the Ukrainian total fertility rate generally met the replacement target and at some points well exceeded it, resulting in a steady population boost, from very low levels post-Holodomor (a cold-blooded extermination attempt) in the 1940s to 1993, when the decline started. In 2001, Ukraine's fertility rate was the extremely low 1.1 child per woman. Deaths outnumbered births, resulting in an annual population decrease of of 373,000 and is now decreasing at around half a million every single year. In 1990, the total population of Ukraine was 52 million. Today, in 2014, it is 45 million ; a population decrease of 7 million in 24 years. Ukraine's situation is very similar to the Italian one, but Ukrainian life expectancy is significantly lower. Ukrainians, too, are on the way to extinction - unless things change.

The list could go on and on, I could sit here and list similar statistics for every Western nation on Earth. So, we can see in these countries that whites are being marginalised in their own homelands. It's not just these countries either, as Vladimir Putin says ; it's in all white countries. Again, to copy Mr. Putin's words - "Whites are dying out. Don't you get it?"

As stated, the necessary absolute lowest fertility rate for replacement is around 2.1 child per woman in the developed world. It's 2.1, and not 2, because this accounts for infant mortality. In the developing world, it can be as high as 4 because of higher infant mortality rates. To commit a slow genocide, it's necessary for the perpetrators to get the fertility rate as far below 2.1 as possible. 1.4 is known to demographers as "critically low", because no civilisation that has gone below 1.4 has ever recovered. I'll now present you with the CIA World Factbook, country comparison by Total Fertility Rate. Look at all the countries who are at or below 1.4, or will soon be so if things continue on their current course. Most of them are nations inhabited mainly by Europeans, or, rather interestingly, are in the Far East. Look how many are below the replacement rate, 2.1. Only two white nations - the Faroe Islands and Argentina - are at or above the replacement rate, and in both cases only just. Are alarm bells ringing?

The motives for white genocide are manifold, ideological and pragmatic. For one thing, the European race has many qualities which are a threat to the consumerist, globalist NWO and their dream of a world filled with hedonistic slaves who care only about beer, porn, football and television. Europeans have always been innovators, inventors, explorers and pioneers. Europeans have always been warriors, diplomats, statesmen, traders and trailblazers. European genius invented electricity, the steam-engine, the motor car, the airplane, the radio, the television, the computer, the Internet, they were the first to go into space, and so on, they invented nearly everything of worth in the world today. This is not supremacism, or jingoism, just facts.

There is also, amongst many (but certainly not all) non-white people, a burning hatred of Europeans because of historical grievances and unsettled disputes, and because of desire for "revenge". Anti-racism never extends to white people, and why would it? The word "racist" was invented by Leon Trotsky, a Jewish communist with a pathological hatred of white people as exhibited by his role in the Red Holocaust, perpetrated by Bolsheviks against gentiles. If you thought Josef Stalin was bad, well how about Leon Trotsky who complained that Stalin wasn't "ruthless" enough? Racism against white people is permitted, and encouraged, because the controllers hate white people and are working around the clock to destroy them. How ironic, then, that "anti-racists" are the biggest racists of them all. With communism, though, this is always the way - things are always described as the opposite of what they really are.

Finally, and most crucially, I want to talk about the methods the NWO are using in their pursuit of their aim, white genocide.

Mass Immigration/Multiculturalism :

Mass immigration and multiculturalism have been forced upon the West, without any semblance of a mandate. No one voted on these policies, and yet here they are. So much for democracy. But then, democracy isn't about freedom and choice, and was never intended to be. It's designed to perpetuate the very opposite, to fool the people into thinking they control their own destinies.

Mass immigration is a virulent weapon against Western (and only Western) societies. It is designed to water down and confuse the tenets of national life. Multiculturalism is a crime, and cannot work. Why should invading cultures have a right to be treated the same as the indigenous one(s)? Why should they be recognised? I often hear from proponents of mass immigration and multiculturalism that we are "all one", and must learn to "tolerate" each other. In my view, this is just an appeal to emotion and attempt to guilt-trip Europeans into accepting alien systems of life, which have no relevance to and are usually incompatible with their own. What "tolerance" really means is "shut up white man, and accept your doom!" The whole dogma of "tolerance" really is farcical, if scrutinised with a critical eye - all cultures are not equal, all cultures are not interchangeable. Why should Europeans "tolerate" wholly alien lifestyles? There are far too many conflicts of interests and differences. To name but a few - language, national loyalty, morals, values, customs and interpretations of the family. Why should the natives adjust to suit foreigners, in the countries their ancestors built and bled for? How dare bleeding-heart liberals and politicians tell the people to "tolerate" it, and call them racist if they do not?

Mass immigration also has the added effect of enabling corporations to scam both native and migrant alike - by flooding Europe with migrants from the Third World, who will willingly accept a lower wage and worse conditions, they force the indigenous people to either accept the worse conditions, or be unemployed. In a homogenous country there can be no such ultimatum, for there aren't armies of foreign workers ready to take jobs that should be given to indigenous people. It enables businesses to treat workers poorly, because they know they can just hire in workers from abroad who aren't anywhere near as fussy. This is where the absolutely ridiculous "immigrants do the jobs we won't do" fallacy comes from. These jobs were done before mass immigration, and would be done again without immigrants. It's insulting to suggest white people are somehow lazy, and the finger of blame is never pointed at greedy big businesses for thinking they can (and to be fair to them - they can, the government won't stop them!) treat the native population like they're doing them some sort of massive favour.

I'm no fan of David Icke, but the man speaks some truths and puts it rather well on page 430 of The Global Conspiracy (and how to end it) ;

"One major way of destroying a sense of nationhood over the generations and opening the way for world government is to have an influx of people from other cultures. The idea is that the native one loses its unchallenged status of the prime blueprint for what constitutes being "British", "German" or whatever. Gradually, what being "British" actually means becomes blurred in the melting pot of competing cultures until they pretty much merge into a cocktail that defies definition. Such an indefinable perception of "nation" is far more willing to concede power to the world government structure..."

A nice example of the benefits of national homogenity is the tiny Himalayan kingdom of Bhutan, a materially poor but cohesive and decent society where King, government and citizen are united in the goal to make Bhutan the best it can be for the Bhutanese people, where the Bhutanese peoples' well being is put above all.

The low birth rates amongst the indigenous population wouldn't matter so much if there weren't, literally, millions of immigrants flooding into the West who on average have 4, 5, 6 or even more kids per family, compared to white families who on average have 1.8. We can see this proved in China, where although the Communist Party have the "one child per family" policy, and China's birth rate is one of the lowest in the world, China is not open to mass immigration. China eventually needs to review its policies, and address the falling birth rate. The bare minimum needed to simply replace the existing population is 2.1, which accounts for infant mortality. It doesn't take a mathematician to work out that, immigration plus high immigrant birth rates, added to the low white birth rates means that in mere decades, white people will be a minority in their own countries.

But shut up and take it, Aryan, you foul racist Nazi.

Miscegenation :

In 1900, white people were 35% of the global population. Now, due to miscegenation and mass immigration, aswell as population booms in Asia and Africa, are less than half that - 17% to be precise. If this continues, what percentage of the world population will be European in 2100? 5%? Less? How about less than 2%?

With other organisms, hybridisation is the surest way to extinction of sub-species. In this case, the Europoid sub-species of the human race. This is because hybrids aren't as genetically strong as their purebred counterparts. For instance, white people almost certainly cannot get sickle cell anaemia - but those who are mixed can. It's also incredibly unlikely that a mixed-race individual will be able to get blood, organ or bone-marrow donations from either parent, should they need it - this is due to the difference in blood type, and it's much more likely that you will be able to find a blood match from your own race, and obviously mixed-race people don't share the race of either of their parents, not fully anyway.

Societally, mixed-race offspring cannot identify with any nation or culture. They are neither one nor the other, and are indigenous to nowhere. There are many accounts on the Internet of mixed-race people suffering a lifelong identity crisis, unable to find real belonging with anyone. This is cruel and unfair, but sadly it is the way of nature. The reality is that race is not just about skin colour ; there are a whole host of other differences, physical, biological, cultural, mental and psychological. If it were just about pigmentation, then one could not reasonably object to race-mixing - in the same way that one cannot reasonably object to people with brown hair breeding with people with blonde hair, but it is not just about pigmentation. There are 4 main pillars of identity - family, religion, race and nationality. How can someone who is mixed identify with the last two?

Race-mixing leads to global homogenisation, for all races, and that's no doubt what the elites want ; a grey, monotone, uniform world with people who have no real loyalties to anywhere so are much easier to control than ethnically pure societies, much like David Icke says in the quote I provided above. Why would someone who is not ethnically or at least racially English (or any white nation) care about that nation, when they have no deep-rooted ties to it?

Miscegenation is always promoted in the media (which is owned by the same people who own the government) for these reasons. It's ultimately destructive, and is the most vicious, spiteful and callous form of racism for it dilutes two races with the goal of destroying the white race. I need not point out any particular examples to you of the MSM promotion of miscegenation - you need only turn on your television, or read a newspaper or a magazine, or watch a Hollywood film. It is everywhere, it is obviously being promoted for a reason - and do we think, just this once, that the NWO are doing it to be nice, because they want to help us, because it's for our own good? NO! They are doing it because they are power-hungry, and white people are the staunchest obstacle in the way to their liberal, cultural Marxist utopia. It erodes all national boundaries and variables that make countries distinct, having the intended effect of making the whole globe far easier to control.

Incidentally, Muhammad Ali has similar thoughts ;



Feminism :

The role feminism plays in all of this cannot be overstated. Feminism masquerades as a movement focused on women's rights, to liberate women, but it is anything but. The main feminist route of attack is to mock and undermine women's natural, traditional role as mothers and pillars of their communities by perpetuating the lie that the only real achievement in life is career and money, and the only real goal is to "have fun". It is a cruel form of oppression, aiming to decieve women into thinking their healthy biological urges to have children and families are part of the mythical plan of straight white males to oppress and put down everyone else. I have never heard anything quite so ridiculous as the "gender is a social construct" mantra of certain ultra-feminist and ultra-liberal groups, as if gender is of no more significance than shoe-size.

Men and women alike have been attacked by social engineering to disassociate sex from fertility, and sexual Bolshevism is a sure sign of a decaying and dying society. Sex was once seen as a highly significant, intimate act to be done in a stable, loving and committed relationship with someone you love and care about deeply - now, it has been reduced to nothing more than "fun", where people will willingly jump into bed with strangers after a few drinks. When sex is regarded with such casuality and offhandedness, and not as the life-giving act it is, it leads to contraception and abortion - the two most effective ways of keeping the population down. Before, people knew exactly that with sex came a high risk of pregnancy and there was no way to reverse that, other than through illegal and highly dangerous abortions. Therefore, sex was something to be undertaken with the greatest care and only when one was in a situation to be able to deal with its natural consequences, and provide and commit to raising their offspring in a stable and healthy environment for 18 years. It would certainly not be done in the careless, casual way it is today if abortion and contraception were not available, and consequences had to be dealt with properly - but today, abortion is a way of attempting to evade the unescapable law that actions have consequences. The committed eugenicist and founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, percieved all of this very well.

Men are also portrayed very negatively in the media, generally. Think of the Homer Simpson archetype - a useless, bumbling oaf who puts his own selfish desires above everyone else and can't be trusted with anything important. Realise how bad it is, when the Homer Simpson archetype is actually kinder than the other misandrist slurs which are that men are all liars, scumbags and traitors who can't be trusted and are out for only one thing. This isn't true, but it doesn't stop it being promoted. As a rebellion against this, women are encouraged to "put themselves first" by engaging in "liberating" activities such as promiscuity, heavy substance abuse and general narcissistic and hedonistic practice. In the words of Henry Makow, this is a "cruel hoax", because it alienates one half of the species from the other. It is most cruel to women, who are told their natural, biological urges are not real and are a construct, and should be resisted at all costs and that cooperating with nature is somehow surrendering to the evil cavemen who want to keep women in their place. On the flip side, the same messages are also (to a lesser extent) aimed at men, that women just nag, hold men down and domesticate them and that settling down to start, protect and provide for a family (again ; the inherent desires of a male) is "boring" and not worth doing. There is also the matter of the liberalised divorce courts, where there is no protection for either party - the man can leave his wife with 2 kids and go with another woman, and vice-versa the woman can leave her husband and disappear with the children. Where is the security? It's understandable that some people are reluctant, then, to start a family - as was the intention.

Because of all of this, a record number of women in England and Wales, 20%, are reaching 45 years of age without any children. Of course, I am NOT saying women should be chained to the kitchen - on the contrary. 45 is widely considered to be, roughly, the end of a woman's childbearing years. Consider that only 2 or 3 children per woman are needed to maintain steady population growth, there is no need for a woman to give up her own personal ambitions of a career or whatever else she may want to do in her personal life - they are not mutually exclusive. To maintain the 2.1 fertility rate, a woman doesn't even need to have her first child until she is at least 35, if she so desires. To increase and maintain a healthy birth rate across society is not to hold women back or crush their own personal goals and priorities, it's very much possible to do both. It's not necessary for women to immediately start having children at 18, and no one is asking for that.

Ethnomasochism :

Ethnomasochism, or racial self-hatred, is a despicable phenomenon promoted with the sole intention of disarming any white resistence to their own eradication, and worse - converting them to approve of it (see Stockholm Syndrome). Ethnomasochism manifests in a lot of ways. One is the bizarre behaviour of radical left "activists", who campaign for obscure causes in far-off lands whilst ignoring the grinding poverty occurring to their own people right under their noses. Such people often go out to Africa, Asia or Latin America and do charity work - while Western Europe has hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people starving and homeless right now. Of course, helping out your own people in your own country is not "glamorous", and doesn't attract the back-slapping from fellow concerned liberals or the artificial buzz of appearing to be totally non-racist and "tolerant". Another way this phenomenon manifests itself is the feeling that, just by being white, one has committed a grevious crime against humanity and that the only way to rectify such a transgression is not to inflict upon the world any more evil white babies, and instead procreate with members of other races (miscegenation) or adopt children from Third World countries and share with them your white privilege, thereby lessening the burdens inflicted upon them by the wickedness of your ancestors and absolve yourself of any blame. Both of these actions are extremely common amongst celebrities and the rich and famous, especially the latter. The media love nothing more than to report on Worthless Celebrity #1's latest adoptee from Africa, and such celebrities do it for their own image and public relations - which is infinitely cruel to the poor children involved.

Because of self-hatred, we see left-aligned white people rushing to denounce and condemn their own ancestors, their history, their culture, country and traditions. The same people rush to adopt and take on cultures totally alien to their natural one, and we see this manifest itself in many ways - white "Rastafarians", young white people who behave as if they are black (known in the US and UK as "wiggers"), and white liberal types who extol the virtues of every single culture and civilisation around the world - apart from European culture and civilisation, which they view as inherently evil and oppressive. What is wrong with your own identity forged from the labour of your ancestors? Why not be proud of that, and exhibit that, rather than desperately try and cling onto someone else's? Deep down, white self-haters know that their outlook is completely abnormal and unhealthy, and this is why people on the far left generaly use extreme methods to cope, such as drugs, alcohol, promiscuous sex, self-harming, anti-depressants/prescription medication, and even suicide attempts. It is to dull the pain caused by the loss of their group identity (a natural human need ; for we are pack animals, not lone wolves), inflicted upon them by social engineers.

"You’re obliged to pretend respect for people and institutions you think absurd. You live attached in a cowardly fashion to moral and social conventions you despise, condemn and know lack all foundation. It is that permanent contradiction between your ideas and desires and all the dead formalities and vain pretenses of your civilisation which makes you sad, troubled and unbalanced. In that intolerable conflict you lose all joy of life and all feeling of personality, because at every moment they suppress and restrain and check the free play of your powers. That’s the poisoned and mortal wound of the civilised world." - Octave Mirbeau

Cultural Marxism :

Cultural Marxism is an amalgamation of Marxian and Freudian psychology. It is Marxism transformed from economics into culture and social politics, and over the last 60 years has gradually been seeping into every pore of Western society. Cultural Marxism exists to attack the glue that holds European society together, and has done so very successfully by pretending to act in the name of freedom. Liberalism, sexual liberalism, degenerate art, hedonism, mass immigration, feminism, promotion of drugs and alcohol, promotion of stupidity as "cool" and intelligence as undesirable and the encouragement aimed at youths to take up low-IQ and base activities rather than anything useful or meaningful, the ridiculing and attacking of nationalism, national identity and religion, and most crucially of all the undermining of the family and local communities are all common themes promoted and advanced by cultural Marxism to isolate people in their own little bubbles and make their takeover of Western nations so much easier.

Cultural Marxism was used by a group of radical left intellectuals from the Frankfurt School, when they came up with a report on how to destroy nations. I have listed just 11 of the most important ways in which cultural Marxism attacks traditional, European, Christian society ;

1. The creation of racism offences
2. Continual change to create confusion
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
4. The undermining of schools' and teachers' authority
5. Huge immigration to destroy identity
6. The promotion of excessive drinking
7. Emptying of churches
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits
10. Control and dumbing down of media
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family.

Sound familiar? A more detailed overview of the history of the Frankfurt School can be found here. (Note - as with all the links I've shared, I haven't looked at everything on the websites and do not necessarily agree with or share the opinions of the authors of the material on other issues, so if you find something you don't like please don't hold it against me.)

I could write a huge, detailed analysis of cultural Marxism, but I want to restrict myself to keeping to the parts that are particularly relevant to the subject of white genocide, which I believe the above 11 points are. The first 10 points really all add up to the 11th, which is "encouraging the breakdown of the family". The family unit is the building block of any successful civilisation throughout history, all across the world and in all time periods. Family is the root of all identity and sense of companionship and unity. From family comes community, from community comes nation. To attack the family, by rubbishing it and portraying it as an oppressive relic of a bygone era dominated by the church, is to attack the fibre of the nation. This is the REAL reason for feminism and its male counterparts such as the MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way), to divide men from women and make the establishment of families as difficult as possible. And it's succeeding.

Political Correctness :

Finally, and I don't need to be too verbose here because I'm sure most people know that political correctness is the manipulation of language in order to suppress any thoughts that are not in-line with the dominant and "accepted" majority - rather like George Orwell's Newspeak, where the choice of available vocabulary is so limited that it makes it almost impossible to speak out with any real meaning. Political correctness is, by and large, a product of the Frankfurt School. In brief and unapologetic terms, political correctness is the pandering to weak and sensitive souls who can't take the real, unadulterated truth and so need it watered down to make it acceptable to their blue pill, liberal mentalities. In the context of white demographic genocide, political correctness is used to smother discussion about the important topics I have raised by bludgeoning people with a volley of inanities like "racist!, "homophobe!", "sexist!", "anti-Semite!", "bigot!" and so on. White people who express concern about cultural Marxism or anything else covered within this thread, on Truth-Zone generally or on the wider alternative media are immediately met with a hailstorm of names and slurs designed to instill in them a guilt complex and shame them into silence. Do not be fooled or disheartened by it, for it means they are losing and want you to shut up.




Well, I've presented you with my thread and it's now up to you to contribute, discuss and debate the issues. I welcome any genuine debate, even if you vehemently disagree with me, but I don't appreciate trolling and should any attempts be made to drag this thread off-topic and turn it into a pit of abuse I'll ignore it, and I implore other members to ignore it too, and do not take the bait. This is an important issue and one that we should be able to discuss properly.

For a final disclaimer, for the mentally impaired, I don't hate anybody and certainly don't condone or support violence of any kind and am not advocating that in any shape or form. I support genuine diversity, I like having a planet full of life in all its natural, beautiful forms. It's necessary to make that absoutely clear, to avoid any accusations or ad hominem attacks.
Last Edit: 09 Jun 2014 16:19 by Seaic. Reason: Wrong thread icon
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

White Genocide 09 Jun 2014 16:28 #2

Hater! Bigot! Racist!

I bet you're a friend of Benjamin Raymond ey, tell me when did you become a member of the National Action you racist piece of shit.. :larf:

Excellently put together research, and done in a way that one couldn't possibly view it as hatred. Unless of course it's judged from a skewed and twisted cultural Marxist perspective, where they want people to believe that everything that opposes their hateful agenda is hatred.
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. – Marcus Aurelius
Last Edit: 09 Jun 2014 17:08 by Return of Zorro.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy, PFIZIPFEI, Orangeaid, Seaic, Timesarrow, peacenik, rodin

White Genocide 09 Jun 2014 17:03 #3

  • spectero
  • spectero's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Everybody Lets Rock
  • Endure
  • Posts: 1276
  • Likes received: 606
Seaic wrote:
This thread is a serious thread, aiming to expose and discuss the ongoing plan to sabotage white countries with the ultimate goal of genocide of the white race, and how it is being achieved. It is not a hate thread. I believe all human races have the right to survive and protect their own way of life in their homelands, without molestation from others. Do you?

First of all I think it would be prudent to explain, in detailed terms, what exactly the white race is and who falls into it, to avoid any confusion or ambiguity. Below, I have taken a map and coloured Europe in blue ;



The terms "white" and "European" are, in this context, synonymous. Though there is some disagreement amongst scholars and anthropologists about particulars, it's broadly agreed that "white" means all white-skinned, non-Jewish people native to Europe and their descendants throughout the world, in the Americas, Australasia and southern Africa. Language and religion doesn't come into it ; I've seen arguments from some people who say groups like the Finns, Hungarians and Basques are not racially European, because they don't speak an Indo-European language. I've seen people who say Albanians and Bosnians aren't racially European, because they practice Islam. Linguistically and religiously, Finnish, Hungarian and Basque are not European languages, and Islam is not a European religion. By the same token, I've seen people claim Armenians, an Asiatic people, are racially European because they are Christians. All of these arguments don't hold much weight with me ; are English-speaking Christian Africans or Spanish-speaking Christian Amerindians racially European, because of their language and religion? Are Indians and Pakistanis, who do speak Indo-European languages, white? The answer to all of these questions is no, of course not.

The best and most concise definition I can offer you, then, is this ; people of exclusively native European ancestry. The white race does not include Jews, Turks, the Sami/Lapps, Roma gypsies, Armenians, Azeris, Kazakhs, Tatars, Chechen, Mexicans or Latin American mestizos. I am undecided whether Georgians, Maltese and Cypriots can be considered white. It does, however, include Greeks, Italians, Spaniards and every other Euro-Mediterranean group - to say otherwise is divisive, baseless, nefarious nonsense, designed to disassociate Northern Europeans from the glorious civilisations of Greece and Rome, and thus to denigrate them as little more than barbarian savages.

Now that is out of the way without getting bogged down in too much technical detail, I'll present to you my evidence that white people are on the way to extinction, if current trends continue.



Short and simple, here Vladimir Putin addresses the crux of the matter. Think what you like about Putin, at least he is openly acknowledging the problem. This also helps to dispel the notion that talk of white genocide is some sort of "far right fringe lunatic conspiracy theory" - this is the President of Russia, the world's 3rd most powerful country, recognising that white people are on the road to extinction!

So, what are the low and falling white birth rates he is talking about? Let's take a look at the 2013 CIA World Factbook country comparison by Birthrate ;

As you can see, you have to go all the way down to 113th to find the first majority white nation, Argentina, and that is highly skewed given the fact that Argentine mestizos have the highest birth rate there - the white Argentine population still has a low birth rate, in keeping with the low white average. You have to go down to 132nd to find the first European nation, Ireland.

Let's look specifically at some individual nations, and see how their white population is faring.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

This article shows that white births now account for less than half of all births in the United States. As if that wasn't a bad enough indicator for the future of the white race, this next article illustrates that, for the first time ever in US history, the white death rates outnumber the white birth rates. These two facts, combined with increasing mass immigration from non-white countries, means that if present trends continue white Americans will soon be a minority.

UNITED KINGDOM

A 2013 article highlights that in 2011, 31% of children born in the UK were born to one foreign parent. In the same year, it was shown that 18% of children born were born to two foreign parents, meaning altogether 49% of children born in the UK that year had foreign ancestry. Professor David Coleman, of Oxford University, said: "On current trends European populations will become more ethnically diverse, with the possibility that today's majority ethnic groups will no longer comprise a numerical majority." What he means, then, without all the politically correct euphemisms that he has to use, is that whites will be a minority in Britain before long. How long? 2066. Already, white British people are a minority at 45% in London, with another 15% being non-British whites. So, only 60% of London is white, according to the 2011 Census. Is that acceptable? Would it be acceptable if Abuja was 45% Nigerian, or would it be called out as genocide?

ITALY

According the Italian National Office of Statistics, the fertility rate of Italian women was 1.41 per head in 2009. This doesn't meet the 2.1 target needed just to replace the existing Italian population. Italy's fertility rate has been below replacements levels for over three decades now. By 2050, Italy will be a country with a birth rate that has been continuously below zero population growth for 75 years. Italy's birth rate in 1950 was almost twice its death rate. But the death rate equaled the birth rate in 1985, exceeds it today and will be approaching twice the birth rate by 2050. Italy is an aging country. Italians are dying out. By 2100, assuming present trends continue, Italy will no longer exist.

GREECE

Greece may seem an odd choice for this list, being relatively small, but seeing as European civilisation all traces back to Greece, and Greece has done more than any other to grow and defend that legacy, I thought it would be poignant to illustrate the Greek demographic crisis in a little depth. Greece has a dangerously low total fertility rate, well below replacement levels at 1.3. Greece also has a rapidly-aging population and a death rate that far outnumbers the birth rate (by 16,300) and because of the economic crisis Greeks are leaving in droves. This all means that in decades, Greece will cease to be a viable nation-state.

GERMANY

The 2011 fertility rate for Germany was just 1.36 per woman. Again, well below the 2.1 necessary just for replacement. Only 663,000 babies were born in Germany in 2011, the lowest in history - contrast this to the peak, in 1964 when German births (east and west) reached 1.4 million. That's over a 50% decrease in less than 50 years, and combined with mass immigration into Germany from Turkey, the wider Middle East and Africa, will mean that Germans will soon be a minority in Germany.

UKRAINE

The demographic decline in Ukraine is another tale of woe. Under the Soviets, the Ukrainian total fertility rate generally met the replacement target and at some points well exceeded it, resulting in a steady population boost, from very low levels post-Holodomor (a cold-blooded extermination attempt) in the 1940s to 1993, when the decline started. In 2001, Ukraine's fertility rate was the extremely low 1.1 child per woman. Deaths outnumbered births, resulting in an annual population decrease of of 373,000 and is now decreasing at around half a million every single year. In 1990, the total population of Ukraine was 52 million. Today, in 2014, it is 45 million ; a population decrease of 7 million in 24 years. Ukraine's situation is very similar to the Italian one, but Ukrainian life expectancy is significantly lower. Ukrainians, too, are on the way to extinction - unless things change.

The list could go on and on, I could sit here and list similar statistics for every Western nation on Earth. So, we can see in these countries that whites are being marginalised in their own homelands. It's not just these countries either, as Vladimir Putin says ; it's in all white countries. Again, to copy Mr. Putin's words - "Whites are dying out. Don't you get it?"

As stated, the necessary absolute lowest fertility rate for replacement is around 2.1 child per woman in the developed world. It's 2.1, and not 2, because this accounts for infant mortality. In the developing world, it can be as high as 4 because of higher infant mortality rates. To commit a slow genocide, it's necessary for the perpetrators to get the fertility rate as far below 2.1 as possible. 1.4 is known to demographers as "critically low", because no civilisation that has gone below 1.4 has ever recovered. I'll now present you with the CIA World Factbook, country comparison by Total Fertility Rate. Look at all the countries who are at or below 1.4, or will soon be so if things continue on their current course. Most of them are nations inhabited mainly by Europeans, or, rather interestingly, are in the Far East. Look how many are below the replacement rate, 2.1. Only two white nations - the Faroe Islands and Argentina - are at or above the replacement rate, and in both cases only just. Are alarm bells ringing?

The motives for white genocide are manifold, ideological and pragmatic. For one thing, the European race has many qualities which are a threat to the consumerist, globalist NWO and their dream of a world filled with hedonistic slaves who care only about beer, porn, football and television. Europeans have always been innovators, inventors, explorers and pioneers. Europeans have always been warriors, diplomats, statesmen, traders and trailblazers. European genius invented electricity, the steam-engine, the motor car, the airplane, the radio, the television, the computer, the Internet, they were the first to go into space, and so on, they invented nearly everything of worth in the world today. This is not supremacism, or jingoism, just facts.

There is also, amongst many (but certainly not all) non-white people, a burning hatred of Europeans because of historical grievances and unsettled disputes, and because of desire for "revenge". Anti-racism never extends to white people, and why would it? The word "racist" was invented by Leon Trotsky, a Jewish communist with a pathological hatred of white people as exhibited by his role in the Red Holocaust, perpetrated by Bolsheviks against gentiles. If you thought Josef Stalin was bad, well how about Leon Trotsky who complained that Stalin wasn't "ruthless" enough? Racism against white people is permitted, and encouraged, because the controllers hate white people and are working around the clock to destroy them. How ironic, then, that "anti-racists" are the biggest racists of them all. With communism, though, this is always the way - things are always described as the opposite of what they really are.

Finally, and most crucially, I want to talk about the methods the NWO are using in their pursuit of their aim, white genocide.

Mass Immigration/Multiculturalism :

Mass immigration and multiculturalism have been forced upon the West, without any semblance of a mandate. No one voted on these policies, and yet here they are. So much for democracy. But then, democracy isn't about freedom and choice, and was never intended to be. It's designed to perpetuate the very opposite, to fool the people into thinking they control their own destinies.

Mass immigration is a virulent weapon against Western (and only Western) societies. It is designed to water down and confuse the tenets of national life. Multiculturalism is a crime, and cannot work. Why should invading cultures have a right to be treated the same as the indigenous one(s)? Why should they be recognised? I often hear from proponents of mass immigration and multiculturalism that we are "all one", and must learn to "tolerate" each other. In my view, this is just an appeal to emotion and attempt to guilt-trip Europeans into accepting alien systems of life, which have no relevance to and are usually incompatible with their own. What "tolerance" really means is "shut up white man, and accept your doom!" The whole dogma of "tolerance" really is farcical, if scrutinised with a critical eye - all cultures are not equal, all cultures are not interchangeable. Why should Europeans "tolerate" wholly alien lifestyles? There are far too many conflicts of interests and differences. To name but a few - language, national loyalty, morals, values, customs and interpretations of the family. Why should the natives adjust to suit foreigners, in the countries their ancestors built and bled for? How dare bleeding-heart liberals and politicians tell the people to "tolerate" it, and call them racist if they do not?

Mass immigration also has the added effect of enabling corporations to scam both native and migrant alike - by flooding Europe with migrants from the Third World, who will willingly accept a lower wage and worse conditions, they force the indigenous people to either accept the worse conditions, or be unemployed. In a homogenous country there can be no such ultimatum, for there aren't armies of foreign workers ready to take jobs that should be given to indigenous people. It enables businesses to treat workers poorly, because they know they can just hire in workers from abroad who aren't anywhere near as fussy. This is where the absolutely ridiculous "immigrants do the jobs we won't do" fallacy comes from. These jobs were done before mass immigration, and would be done again without immigrants. It's insulting to suggest white people are somehow lazy, and the finger of blame is never pointed at greedy big businesses for thinking they can (and to be fair to them - they can, the government won't stop them!) treat the native population like they're doing them some sort of massive favour.

I'm no fan of David Icke, but the man speaks some truths and puts it rather well on page 430 of The Global Conspiracy (and how to end it) ;

"One major way of destroying a sense of nationhood over the generations and opening the way for world government is to have an influx of people from other cultures. The idea is that the native one loses its unchallenged status of the prime blueprint for what constitutes being "British", "German" or whatever. Gradually, what being "British" actually means becomes blurred in the melting pot of competing cultures until they pretty much merge into a cocktail that defies definition. Such an indefinable perception of "nation" is far more willing to concede power to the world government structure..."

A nice example of the benefits of national homogenity is the tiny Himalayan kingdom of Bhutan, a materially poor but cohesive and decent society where King, government and citizen are united in the goal to make Bhutan the best it can be for the Bhutanese people, where the Bhutanese peoples' well being is put above all.

The low birth rates amongst the indigenous population wouldn't matter so much if there weren't, literally, millions of immigrants flooding into the West who on average have 4, 5, 6 or even more kids per family, compared to white families who on average have 1.8. We can see this proved in China, where although the Communist Party have the "one child per family" policy, and China's birth rate is one of the lowest in the world, China is not open to mass immigration. China eventually needs to review its policies, and address the falling birth rate. The bare minimum needed to simply replace the existing population is 2.1, which accounts for infant mortality. It doesn't take a mathematician to work out that, immigration plus high immigrant birth rates, added to the low white birth rates means that in mere decades, white people will be a minority in their own countries.

But shut up and take it, Aryan, you foul racist Nazi.

Miscegenation :

In 1900, white people were 35% of the global population. Now, due to miscegenation and mass immigration, aswell as population booms in Asia and Africa, are less than half that - 17% to be precise. If this continues, what percentage of the world population will be European in 2100? 5%? Less? How about less than 2%?

With other organisms, hybridisation is the surest way to extinction of sub-species. In this case, the Europoid sub-species of the human race. This is because hybrids aren't as genetically strong as their purebred counterparts. For instance, white people almost certainly cannot get sickle cell anaemia - but those who are mixed can. It's also incredibly unlikely that a mixed-race individual will be able to get blood, organ or bone-marrow donations from either parent, should they need it - this is due to the difference in blood type, and it's much more likely that you will be able to find a blood match from your own race, and obviously mixed-race people don't share the race of either of their parents, not fully anyway.

Societally, mixed-race offspring cannot identify with any nation or culture. They are neither one nor the other, and are indigenous to nowhere. There are many accounts on the Internet of mixed-race people suffering a lifelong identity crisis, unable to find real belonging with anyone. This is cruel and unfair, but sadly it is the way of nature. The reality is that race is not just about skin colour ; there are a whole host of other differences, physical, biological, cultural, mental and psychological. If it were just about pigmentation, then one could not reasonably object to race-mixing - in the same way that one cannot reasonably object to people with brown hair breeding with people with blonde hair, but it is not just about pigmentation. There are 4 main pillars of identity - family, religion, race and nationality. How can someone who is mixed identify with the last two?

Race-mixing leads to global homogenisation, for all races, and that's no doubt what the elites want ; a grey, monotone, uniform world with people who have no real loyalties to anywhere so are much easier to control than ethnically pure societies, much like David Icke says in the quote I provided above. Why would someone who is not ethnically or at least racially English (or any white nation) care about that nation, when they have no deep-rooted ties to it?

Miscegenation is always promoted in the media (which is owned by the same people who own the government) for these reasons. It's ultimately destructive, and is the most vicious, spiteful and callous form of racism for it dilutes two races with the goal of destroying the white race. I need not point out any particular examples to you of the MSM promotion of miscegenation - you need only turn on your television, or read a newspaper or a magazine, or watch a Hollywood film. It is everywhere, it is obviously being promoted for a reason - and do we think, just this once, that the NWO are doing it to be nice, because they want to help us, because it's for our own good? NO! They are doing it because they are power-hungry, and white people are the staunchest obstacle in the way to their liberal, cultural Marxist utopia. It erodes all national boundaries and variables that make countries distinct, having the intended effect of making the whole globe far easier to control.

Incidentally, Muhammad Ali has similar thoughts ;



Feminism :

The role feminism plays in all of this cannot be overstated. Feminism masquerades as a movement focused on women's rights, to liberate women, but it is anything but. The main feminist route of attack is to mock and undermine women's natural, traditional role as mothers and pillars of their communities by perpetuating the lie that the only real achievement in life is career and money, and the only real goal is to "have fun". It is a cruel form of oppression, aiming to decieve women into thinking their healthy biological urges to have children and families are part of the mythical plan of straight white males to oppress and put down everyone else. I have never heard anything quite so ridiculous as the "gender is a social construct" mantra of certain ultra-feminist and ultra-liberal groups, as if gender is of no more significance than shoe-size.

Men and women alike have been attacked by social engineering to disassociate sex from fertility, and sexual Bolshevism is a sure sign of a decaying and dying society. Sex was once seen as a highly significant, intimate act to be done in a stable, loving and committed relationship with someone you love and care about deeply - now, it has been reduced to nothing more than "fun", where people will willingly jump into bed with strangers after a few drinks. When sex is regarded with such casuality and offhandedness, and not as the life-giving act it is, it leads to contraception and abortion - the two most effective ways of keeping the population down. Before, people knew exactly that with sex came a high risk of pregnancy and there was no way to reverse that, other than through illegal and highly dangerous abortions. Therefore, sex was something to be undertaken with the greatest care and only when one was in a situation to be able to deal with its natural consequences, and provide and commit to raising their offspring in a stable and healthy environment for 18 years. It would certainly not be done in the careless, casual way it is today if abortion and contraception were not available, and consequences had to be dealt with properly - but today, abortion is a way of attempting to evade the unescapable law that actions have consequences. The committed eugenicist and founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, percieved all of this very well.

Men are also portrayed very negatively in the media, generally. Think of the Homer Simpson archetype - a useless, bumbling oaf who puts his own selfish desires above everyone else and can't be trusted with anything important. Realise how bad it is, when the Homer Simpson archetype is actually kinder than the other misandrist slurs which are that men are all liars, scumbags and traitors who can't be trusted and are out for only one thing. This isn't true, but it doesn't stop it being promoted. As a rebellion against this, women are encouraged to "put themselves first" by engaging in "liberating" activities such as promiscuity, heavy substance abuse and general narcissistic and hedonistic practice. In the words of Henry Makow, this is a "cruel hoax", because it alienates one half of the species from the other. It is most cruel to women, who are told their natural, biological urges are not real and are a construct, and should be resisted at all costs and that cooperating with nature is somehow surrendering to the evil cavemen who want to keep women in their place. On the flip side, the same messages are also (to a lesser extent) aimed at men, that women just nag, hold men down and domesticate them and that settling down to start, protect and provide for a family (again ; the inherent desires of a male) is "boring" and not worth doing. There is also the matter of the liberalised divorce courts, where there is no protection for either party - the man can leave his wife with 2 kids and go with another woman, and vice-versa the woman can leave her husband and disappear with the children. Where is the security? It's understandable that some people are reluctant, then, to start a family - as was the intention.

Because of all of this, a record number of women in England and Wales, 20%, are reaching 45 years of age without any children. Of course, I am NOT saying women should be chained to the kitchen - on the contrary. 45 is widely considered to be, roughly, the end of a woman's childbearing years. Consider that only 2 or 3 children per woman are needed to maintain steady population growth, there is no need for a woman to give up her own personal ambitions of a career or whatever else she may want to do in her personal life - they are not mutually exclusive. To maintain the 2.1 fertility rate, a woman doesn't even need to have her first child until she is at least 35, if she so desires. To increase and maintain a healthy birth rate across society is not to hold women back or crush their own personal goals and priorities, it's very much possible to do both. It's not necessary for women to immediately start having children at 18, and no one is asking for that.

Ethnomasochism :

Ethnomasochism, or racial self-hatred, is a despicable phenomenon promoted with the sole intention of disarming any white resistence to their own eradication, and worse - converting them to approve of it (see Stockholm Syndrome). Ethnomasochism manifests in a lot of ways. One is the bizarre behaviour of radical left "activists", who campaign for obscure causes in far-off lands whilst ignoring the grinding poverty occurring to their own people right under their noses. Such people often go out to Africa, Asia or Latin America and do charity work - while Western Europe has hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people starving and homeless right now. Of course, helping out your own people in your own country is not "glamorous", and doesn't attract the back-slapping from fellow concerned liberals or the artificial buzz of appearing to be totally non-racist and "tolerant". Another way this phenomenon manifests itself is the feeling that, just by being white, one has committed a grevious crime against humanity and that the only way to rectify such a transgression is not to inflict upon the world any more evil white babies, and instead procreate with members of other races (miscegenation) or adopt children from Third World countries and share with them your white privilege, thereby lessening the burdens inflicted upon them by the wickedness of your ancestors and absolve yourself of any blame. Both of these actions are extremely common amongst celebrities and the rich and famous, especially the latter. The media love nothing more than to report on Worthless Celebrity #1's latest adoptee from Africa, and such celebrities do it for their own image and public relations - which is infinitely cruel to the poor children involved.

Because of self-hatred, we see left-aligned white people rushing to denounce and condemn their own ancestors, their history, their culture, country and traditions. The same people rush to adopt and take on cultures totally alien to their natural one, and we see this manifest itself in many ways - white "Rastafarians", young white people who behave as if they are black (known in the US and UK as "wiggers"), and white liberal types who extol the virtues of every single culture and civilisation around the world - apart from European culture and civilisation, which they view as inherently evil and oppressive. What is wrong with your own identity forged from the labour of your ancestors? Why not be proud of that, and exhibit that, rather than desperately try and cling onto someone else's? Deep down, white self-haters know that their outlook is completely abnormal and unhealthy, and this is why people on the far left generaly use extreme methods to cope, such as drugs, alcohol, promiscuous sex, self-harming, anti-depressants/prescription medication, and even suicide attempts. It is to dull the pain caused by the loss of their group identity (a natural human need ; for we are pack animals, not lone wolves), inflicted upon them by social engineers.

"You’re obliged to pretend respect for people and institutions you think absurd. You live attached in a cowardly fashion to moral and social conventions you despise, condemn and know lack all foundation. It is that permanent contradiction between your ideas and desires and all the dead formalities and vain pretenses of your civilisation which makes you sad, troubled and unbalanced. In that intolerable conflict you lose all joy of life and all feeling of personality, because at every moment they suppress and restrain and check the free play of your powers. That’s the poisoned and mortal wound of the civilised world." - Octave Mirbeau

Cultural Marxism :

Cultural Marxism is an amalgamation of Marxian and Freudian psychology. It is Marxism transformed from economics into culture and social politics, and over the last 60 years has gradually been seeping into every pore of Western society. Cultural Marxism exists to attack the glue that holds European society together, and has done so very successfully by pretending to act in the name of freedom. Liberalism, sexual liberalism, degenerate art, hedonism, mass immigration, feminism, promotion of drugs and alcohol, promotion of stupidity as "cool" and intelligence as undesirable and the encouragement aimed at youths to take up low-IQ and base activities rather than anything useful or meaningful, the ridiculing and attacking of nationalism, national identity and religion, and most crucially of all the undermining of the family and local communities are all common themes promoted and advanced by cultural Marxism to isolate people in their own little bubbles and make their takeover of Western nations so much easier.

Cultural Marxism was used by a group of radical left intellectuals from the Frankfurt School, when they came up with a report on how to destroy nations. I have listed just 11 of the most important ways in which cultural Marxism attacks traditional, European, Christian society ;

1. The creation of racism offences
2. Continual change to create confusion
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
4. The undermining of schools' and teachers' authority
5. Huge immigration to destroy identity
6. The promotion of excessive drinking
7. Emptying of churches
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits
10. Control and dumbing down of media
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family.

Sound familiar? A more detailed overview of the history of the Frankfurt School can be found here. (Note - as with all the links I've shared, I haven't looked at everything on the websites and do not necessarily agree with or share the opinions of the authors of the material on other issues, so if you find something you don't like please don't hold it against me.)

I could write a huge, detailed analysis of cultural Marxism, but I want to restrict myself to keeping to the parts that are particularly relevant to the subject of white genocide, which I believe the above 11 points are. The first 10 points really all add up to the 11th, which is "encouraging the breakdown of the family". The family unit is the building block of any successful civilisation throughout history, all across the world and in all time periods. Family is the root of all identity and sense of companionship and unity. From family comes community, from community comes nation. To attack the family, by rubbishing it and portraying it as an oppressive relic of a bygone era dominated by the church, is to attack the fibre of the nation. This is the REAL reason for feminism and its male counterparts such as the MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way), to divide men from women and make the establishment of families as difficult as possible. And it's succeeding.

Political Correctness :

Finally, and I don't need to be too verbose here because I'm sure most people know that political correctness is the manipulation of language in order to suppress any thoughts that are not in-line with the dominant and "accepted" majority - rather like George Orwell's Newspeak, where the choice of available vocabulary is so limited that it makes it almost impossible to speak out with any real meaning. Political correctness is, by and large, a product of the Frankfurt School. In brief and unapologetic terms, political correctness is the pandering to weak and sensitive souls who can't take the real, unadulterated truth and so need it watered down to make it acceptable to their blue pill, liberal mentalities. In the context of white demographic genocide, political correctness is used to smother discussion about the important topics I have raised by bludgeoning people with a volley of inanities like "racist!, "homophobe!", "sexist!", "anti-Semite!", "bigot!" and so on. White people who express concern about cultural Marxism or anything else covered within this thread, on Truth-Zone generally or on the wider alternative media are immediately met with a hailstorm of names and slurs designed to instill in them a guilt complex and shame them into silence. Do not be fooled or disheartened by it, for it means they are losing and want you to shut up.




Well, I've presented you with my thread and it's now up to you to contribute, discuss and debate the issues. I welcome any genuine debate, even if you vehemently disagree with me, but I don't appreciate trolling and should any attempts be made to drag this thread off-topic and turn it into a pit of abuse I'll ignore it, and I implore other members to ignore it too, and do not take the bait. This is an important issue and one that we should be able to discuss properly.

For a final disclaimer, for the mentally impaired, I don't hate anybody and certainly don't condone or support violence of any kind and am not advocating that in any shape or form. I support genuine diversity, I like having a planet full of life in all its natural, beautiful forms. It's necessary to make that absoutely clear, to avoid any accusations or ad hominem attacks.

What a extremely passionate well thought-out post...which was a pleasure to read :) It does leave me conflicted though.
" I was bored before I even began ".
Last Edit: 09 Jun 2014 17:05 by spectero.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Seaic

White Genocide 09 Jun 2014 17:06 #4

  • Seaic
  • Seaic's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Posts: 1915
  • Likes received: 2150
spectero wrote:
What a extremely passionate well thought-out post...which was a pleasure to read :) It does leave me conflicted though.

Thanks spectero! :) In what way does it leave you conflicted?
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

White Genocide 09 Jun 2014 17:18 #5

  • Lizzy
  • Lizzy's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 4882
  • Likes received: 2982

not a recent vid either -
Last Edit: 09 Jun 2014 17:20 by Lizzy.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Seaic, peacenik, Macdon

White Genocide 09 Jun 2014 17:24 #6

  • spectero
  • spectero's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Everybody Lets Rock
  • Endure
  • Posts: 1276
  • Likes received: 606
Seaic wrote:
spectero wrote:
What a extremely passionate well thought-out post...which was a pleasure to read :) It does leave me conflicted though.

Thanks spectero! :) In what way does it leave you conflicted?

Well....My parents were committed National Socialists from Germany and Italy...some might say I can't possibly be considered white by having a southern Italian father. At the same time...As white as the Russians are...I could never consider them my brothers or sisters. Any European country that has a male life expectancy of 65 or less have to be considered backward. I feel the same about the Poles and most of Eastern Europe. They are not and will never be my kin. :) Although It is interesting to see how other National Socialists see the world. :)
" I was bored before I even began ".
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

White Genocide 09 Jun 2014 17:46 #7

  • Jagged Hope
  • Jagged Hope's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Fresh Member
  • Posts: 426
  • Likes received: 297
Seaic wrote:

Miscegenation :

In 1900, white people were 35% of the global population. Now, due to miscegenation and mass immigration, aswell as population booms in Asia and Africa, are less than half that - 17% to be precise. If this continues, what percentage of the world population will be European in 2100? 5%? Less? How about less than 2%?

With other organisms, hybridisation is the surest way to extinction of sub-species. In this case, the Europoid sub-species of the human race. This is because hybrids aren't as genetically strong as their purebred counterparts. For instance, white people almost certainly cannot get sickle cell anaemia - but those who are mixed can. It's also incredibly unlikely that a mixed-race individual will be able to get blood, organ or bone-marrow donations from either parent, should they need it - this is due to the difference in blood type, and it's much more likely that you will be able to find a blood match from your own race, and obviously mixed-race people don't share the race of either of their parents, not fully anyway.

Societally, mixed-race offspring cannot identify with any nation or culture. They are neither one nor the other, and are indigenous to nowhere. There are many accounts on the Internet of mixed-race people suffering a lifelong identity crisis, unable to find real belonging with anyone. This is cruel and unfair, but sadly it is the way of nature. The reality is that race is not just about skin colour ; there are a whole host of other differences, physical, biological, cultural, mental and psychological. If it were just about pigmentation, then one could not reasonably object to race-mixing - in the same way that one cannot reasonably object to people with brown hair breeding with people with blonde hair, but it is not just about pigmentation. There are 4 main pillars of identity - family, religion, race and nationality. How can someone who is mixed identify with the last two?

Race-mixing leads to global homogenisation, for all races, and that's no doubt what the elites want ; a grey, monotone, uniform world with people who have no real loyalties to anywhere so are much easier to control than ethnically pure societies, much like David Icke says in the quote I provided above. Why would someone who is not ethnically or at least racially English (or any white nation) care about that nation, when they have no deep-rooted ties to it?

Miscegenation is always promoted in the media (which is owned by the same people who own the government) for these reasons. It's ultimately destructive, and is the most vicious, spiteful and callous form of racism for it dilutes two races with the goal of destroying the white race. I need not point out any particular examples to you of the MSM promotion of miscegenation - you need only turn on your television, or read a newspaper or a magazine, or watch a Hollywood film. It is everywhere, it is obviously being promoted for a reason - and do we think, just this once, that the NWO are doing it to be nice, because they want to help us, because it's for our own good? NO! They are doing it because they are power-hungry, and white people are the staunchest obstacle in the way to their liberal, cultural Marxist utopia. It erodes all national boundaries and variables that make countries distinct, having the intended effect of making the whole globe far easier to control.

Incidentally, Muhammad Ali has similar thoughts ;



.

I have a problem with this part.

I'm not a scientist but 'pure breed' anything tends to lead to a proliferation of congenital issues; spina bifida being one. "Inbreeding" has many problems and for example, a mixed breed dog is often stronger than a pure breed whose issues become worse as generations go on.

I also have a problem with the idea that racial inter-marriage and children of those marriages are in any way inferior.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: spectero

White Genocide 09 Jun 2014 17:51 #8

  • Seaic
  • Seaic's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Posts: 1915
  • Likes received: 2150
Breeding with someone of the same race is not the same as incest. I also never said that mixed-race people are inferior only that they face their own unique set of problems and biological realities. It's not necessarily very nice, but nature isn't.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

White Genocide 09 Jun 2014 18:02 #9

  • Seaic
  • Seaic's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Posts: 1915
  • Likes received: 2150
spectero wrote:
Well....My parents were committed National Socialists from Germany and Italy...some might say I can't possibly be considered white by having a southern Italian father. At the same time...As white as the Russians are...I could never consider them my brothers or sisters. Any European country that has a male life expectancy of 65 or less have to be considered backward. I feel the same about the Poles and most of Eastern Europe. They are not and will never be my kin. :) Although It is interesting to see how other National Socialists see the world. :)

I personally consider all Europeans brothers, and I think the reason certain countries are "backward" (still far more developed than most of the rest of the world, by the way!) is because of communism and other famines and wars throughout recent history. Ireland, for example, has still not recovered from the Potato Famine and if things continue, will never... for a very long time at least!
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy, PFIZIPFEI, Orangeaid

White Genocide 09 Jun 2014 18:07 #10

  • wolfy
  • wolfy's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 2934
  • Likes received: 976
Seaic wrote:

Good post Seaic.

I suppose the glaring question is, who is the NWO that is implementing this plan?
It was always going to happen!!
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Seaic

White Genocide 09 Jun 2014 18:22 #11

  • spectero
  • spectero's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Everybody Lets Rock
  • Endure
  • Posts: 1276
  • Likes received: 606
Seaic wrote:
spectero wrote:
Well....My parents were committed National Socialists from Germany and Italy...some might say I can't possibly be considered white by having a southern Italian father. At the same time...As white as the Russians are...I could never consider them my brothers or sisters. Any European country that has a male life expectancy of 65 or less have to be considered backward. I feel the same about the Poles and most of Eastern Europe. They are not and will never be my kin. :) Although It is interesting to see how other National Socialists see the world. :)

I personally consider all Europeans brothers, and I think the reason certain countries are "backward" (still far more developed than most of the rest of the world, by the way!) is because of communism and other famines and wars throughout recent history. Ireland, for example, has still not recovered from the Potato Famine and if things continue, will never... for a very long time at least!

I'm talking about the Russians here :) ...Biggest country in the world...always had a bigger population than any other European nation..a plethora of natural Resources...And still these dogs could never give their population a decent life. Even hundreds of years before communism. In recent times Russia has been compared to Nigeria....I can see why.
" I was bored before I even began ".
Last Edit: 09 Jun 2014 18:24 by spectero.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: PFIZIPFEI

White Genocide 09 Jun 2014 18:23 #12

  • Lizzy
  • Lizzy's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 4882
  • Likes received: 2982
wolfy wrote:
Seaic wrote:

Good post Seaic.

I suppose the glaring question is, who is the NWO that is implementing this plan?
Talmudic / AshkeNAZI jews. Once they secured England as their island base - the Grand Plan was written up. John Dee . adviser to Eliz.1 got the foot hold after their expulsion - but it was Cromwell who let them back in as re-payment for financial backing in the Civil War and the beheading of Charles 1 in 1649 - and of course their infiltration,destruction by loans and usury where ever they went.
Last Edit: 09 Jun 2014 18:24 by Lizzy.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Orangeaid, Macdon

White Genocide 09 Jun 2014 18:25 #13

  • Jagged Hope
  • Jagged Hope's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Fresh Member
  • Posts: 426
  • Likes received: 297
I thought this was interesting.

Distribution of Blood Types


Blood provides an ideal opportunity for the study of human variation without cultural prejudice. It can be easily classified for many different genetically inherited blood typing systems. Also significant is the fact that we rarely take blood types into consideration in selecting mates. In addition, few people know their own type today and no one did prior to 1900. As a result, differences in blood type frequencies around the world are most likely due to other factors than social discrimination. Contemporary Japan is somewhat of an exception since there are popular Japanese stereotypes about people with different blood types. This could affect choice in marriage partners for some Japanese.

All human populations share the same 29 known blood systems, although they differ in the frequencies of specific types. Given the evolutionary closeness of apes and monkeys to our species, it is not surprising that some of them share a number of blood typing systems with us as well.

When we donate blood or have surgery, a small sample is usually taken in advance for at least ABO click this icon to hear the preceding term pronounced and Rh click this icon to hear the preceding term pronounced systems typing. If you are O+, the O is your ABO type and the + is your Rh type. It is possible to be A, B, AB, or O as well as Rh+ click this icon to hear the preceding term pronounced or Rh- click this icon to hear the preceding term pronounced. You inherited your blood types from your parents and the environment in which you live cannot change them.


ABO Blood Type System

We have learned a good deal about how common each of the ABO blood types is around the world. It is quite clear that the distribution patterns are complex. Both clinal and discontinuous distributions exist, suggesting a complicated evolutionary history for humanity. This can be seen with the global frequency patterns of the type B blood allele (shown in the map below). Note that it is highest in Central Asia and lowest among the indigenous peoples of the Americas and Australia. However, there are relatively high frequency pockets in Africa as well. Overall in the world, B is the rarest ABO blood allele. Only 16% of humanity have it.



The A blood allele is somewhat more common around the world than B. About 21% of all people share the A allele. The highest frequencies of A are found in small, unrelated populations, especially the Blackfoot Indians of Montana (30-35%), the Australian Aborigines (many groups are 40-53%), and the Lapps, or Saami people, of Northern Scandinavia (50-90%). The A allele apparently was absent among Central and South American Indians.



The O blood type (usually resulting from the absence of both A and B alleles) is very common around the world. About 63% of humans share it. Type O is particularly high in frequency among the indigenous populations of Central and South America, where it approaches 100%. It also is relatively high among Australian Aborigines and in Western Europe (especially in populations with Celtic ancestors). The lowest frequency of O is found in Eastern Europe and Central Asia, where B is common.



Other Blood Type Systems

The majority of the people in the world have the Rh+ blood type. However, it is more common in some regions. Native Americans and Australian Aborigines were very likely 99-100% Rh+ before they began interbreeding with people from other parts of the world. This does not imply that Native Americans and Australian Aborigines are historically closely related to each other. Most Subsaharan African populations are around 97-99% Rh+. East Asians are 93-99+% Rh+. Europeans have the lowest frequency of this blood type for any continent. They are 83-85% Rh+. The lowest known frequency is found among the Basques of the Pyrenees Mountains between France and Spain. They are only 65% Rh+.

The distribution patterns for the Diego click this icon to hear the preceding term pronounced blood system are even more striking. Evidently, all Africans, Europeans, East Indians, Australian Aborigines, and Polynesians are Diego negative. The only populations with Diego positive people may be Native Americans (2-46%) and East Asians (3-12%). This nonrandom distribution pattern fits well with the hypothesis of an East Asian origin for Native Americans.


Conclusion

These patterns of ABO, Rh, and Diego blood type distributions are not similar to those for skin color or other so-called "racial" traits. The implication is that the specific causes responsible for the distribution of human blood types have been different than those for other traits that have been commonly employed to categorize people into "races." Since it would be possible to divide up humanity into radically different groupings using blood typing instead of other genetically inherited traits such as skin color, we have more conclusive evidence that the commonly used typological model for understanding human variation is scientifically unsound.

The more we study the precise details of human variation, the more we understand how complex are the patterns. They cannot be easily summarized or understood. Yet, this hard-earned scientific knowledge is generally ignored in most countries because of more demanding social and political concerns. As a result, discrimination based on presumed "racial" groups still continues. It is important to keep in mind that this "racial" classification often has more to do with cultural and historical distinctions than it does with biology. In a very real sense, "race" is a distinction that is created by culture not biology.

anthro.palomar.edu/vary/vary_3.htm
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

White Genocide 09 Jun 2014 18:26 #14

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960
wolfy wrote:
Good post Seaic.

I suppose the glaring question is, who is the NWO that is implementing this plan?


See the PAIDEIA agenda of Barbara Lerner-Spectre and Coudenhove-Kalergi's "Practical Idealism" quotes on ziopedia!
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 09 Jun 2014 18:27 by PFIZIPFEI.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy

White Genocide 09 Jun 2014 18:49 #15

  • wolfy
  • wolfy's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 2934
  • Likes received: 976
Friday wrote:
Talmudic / AshkeNAZI jews. Once they secured England as their island base - the Grand Plan was written up. John Dee . adviser to Eliz.1 got the foot hold after their expulsion - but it was Cromwell who let them back in as re-payment for financial backing in the Civil War and the beheading of Charles 1 in 1649 - and of course their infiltration,destruction by loans and usury where ever they went.

Where do the Monarchies fit into this?

Most in Europe are Christian, If I am not Mistaken, why would they let Jews infiltrate and take over, with a view to destroying everything that they own.

Also, what is the ultimate endgame of this plan?
It was always going to happen!!
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

White Genocide 09 Jun 2014 20:22 #16

  • Seaic
  • Seaic's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Posts: 1915
  • Likes received: 2150
@Jagged Hope, post #13

It was indeed interesting, but I account for that in my OP - I said that different races can share blood types, but it's less likely. I do have to disagree with the following, though, quite strongly (I'm aware they're not your words) ;
The more we study the precise details of human variation, the more we understand how complex are the patterns. They cannot be easily summarized or understood. Yet, this hard-earned scientific knowledge is generally ignored in most countries because of more demanding social and political concerns. As a result, discrimination based on presumed "racial" groups still continues. It is important to keep in mind that this "racial" classification often has more to do with cultural and historical distinctions than it does with biology. In a very real sense, "race" is a distinction that is created by culture not biology.

That just isn't true, it implies that there is no genetic, biological or physical differences between the races and that they are just a "social construct", but that can easily be shown up as nonsense and immediately makes me question the motives of academics who come out with it. Usually it is politically-motivated, with the aim of denigrating race into something inconsequential so they can then say "so, it doesn't matter if a race disappears because it's just a man-made concept anyway". It's absurd, because we have no problems recognising the difference between every species and sub-species in the animal and plant kingdoms, but not with humans - because it's political.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy, Return of Zorro, peacenik, Macdon

White Genocide 09 Jun 2014 20:26 #17

  • Seaic
  • Seaic's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Posts: 1915
  • Likes received: 2150
wolfy wrote:
Where do the Monarchies fit into this?

Most in Europe are Christian, If I am not Mistaken, why would they let Jews infiltrate and take over, with a view to destroying everything that they own.

There are many possible reasons, but ultimately one cannot tell with complete certainty and to be honest, I don't really want to get bogged down in that here. Suffice it to say that most European monarchies today aren't really Christians, that's just a front for the peoples' consumption.

Also, what is the ultimate endgame of this plan?

Removal of any and all obstacles to a global Orwellian-Huxleyan utopian, one world government nightmare.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy

White Genocide 09 Jun 2014 20:46 #18

  • Lizzy
  • Lizzy's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 4882
  • Likes received: 2982
wolfy - that is a very big question - one that I've spent 10 yrs learning -
here's something that Seaic also alludes to - they is of course much more -


and what was known 300yrs ago.
www.iamthewitness.com/listeners/U.S.Founding.Fathers%27.Statements.Concerning.the.Jews.htm
remembering that all wars' and revolutions these people have for the most part engineered.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: jaxdreaming, Return of Zorro, Organizemyroom

White Genocide 09 Jun 2014 21:35 #19

  • Jagged Hope
  • Jagged Hope's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Fresh Member
  • Posts: 426
  • Likes received: 297
Seaic wrote:

That just isn't true, it implies that there is no genetic, biological or physical differences between the races and that they are just a "social construct", but that can easily be shown up as nonsense and immediately makes me question the motives of academics who come out with it. Usually it is politically-motivated, with the aim of denigrating race into something inconsequential so they can then say "so, it doesn't matter if a race disappears because it's just a man-made concept anyway". It's absurd, because we have no problems recognising the difference between every species and sub-species in the animal and plant kingdoms, but not with humans - because it's political.

I agree with you that it's far too sweeping a statement to say that race is a social construct. Similarly gender is not a social construct.
Last Edit: 09 Jun 2014 21:36 by Jagged Hope.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Seaic

White Genocide 09 Jun 2014 22:05 #20

  • ..........
  • ..........'s Avatar
  • Online
  • Straight Shooter
  • Posts: 10038
  • Likes received: 2853
Seaic wrote:
I also never said that mixed-race people are inferior only that they face their own unique set of problems and biological realities. It's not necessarily very nice, but nature isn't.

Please elaborate
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
Moderators: novum, rodin, Flare
Powered by Kunena Forum

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it. Secure transactions via paypal.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2019 - May 2020, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 270 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 100 - Raised
( £ 80 GBP )
donation thermometer
29%
Updated
31st May 2019

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.