TOPIC: White Genocide

White genocide is something I think most people believe exists, even if not all of those know they believe it.

If you speak to a regular individual who's averagely lucid and honest, whether he's white or otherwise he'll admit to it.
If you speak to a more left-leaning dreamer or secret hater of the white race, it'll take more time to get it out of them but they'll give themselves away by mistake if you work them long enough, without ever spitting it out literally word for word but rather revealing indirectly that it exists in their mind.

That's been my experience. Very few people who live in the West actually doubt it exists. What they doubt, really, is that it's a bad thing.

Dork Lard wrote:
No you doubt that its a bad thing

Lefty Media Suddenly Against Immigration

MrAnderson wrote:
I'm open to any idea or concept, because at any one time in your life you might be led to think one way but realize in later years that you were actually biased although you were certain you were on the right path...
but how can anyone argue with full moral conscience that it's a GOOD THING that one people should disappear ? black white or any specific race ? How is genocide positive ?

I've heard the arguments for it: whites are evil and all that crap, but among the slightly less ridiculous arguments that at the end of the day we're all human and race doesn't matter and the future belongs to the diverse and the culturally mobile etc... but strangely enough those same people are very often the ones that won't say the same about blacks for e.g., so those supposedly rational arguments really come from a place of focused hatred and emotion, not of intellectual fairness as advertised.

Leftists haven't the the faintest idea what they stand for unless somebody tells them.

Lux Interior wrote:
I see what you mean but I think there's a very important (crucial, in fact) distinction to be made between intelligence and emotion. You can be intelligent but terribly fragile emotionally which makes you do and say stupid things, but you've still got that basic intelligence inside there somewhere where you can call a spade a spade. Leftists are emotionally unstable, all of them yes seriously every single last one of them and they react in argument with emotion not sense, but that doesn't mean that sense isn't somewhere in them. They just don't allow themselves to be sensible, because their emotions block that sense.

One proof of that is the leftists' perpetual contradictions: a contradiction comes from knowing something intuitively but attempting to argue the opposite over that intuitive knowledge. So they'll allow racism exists, but not that races exist. They'll swear that races are a social construct, but then have no issue blaming "white privilege" or calling for white genocide. And they'll get just as confused with transgender/LGBTQ terminology and concepts but pretend like it's not confusing at all.
They KNOW intuitively all the same things as the regular sensible right-leaning citizen, they just bury it under layers of emotionally borne nonsense.

In other words they're fucked up morons.

In case someone didn't watch the video (lefty media suddenly against immigration), here is the description:

The New York Times, the Guardian, Vox, and the Washington Post have suddenly recognized that replacement migration destroys national identity. They call it "colonization" that could "exacerbate unrest" and even spark fears of "ethnic cleansing." Jared Taylor explains this startling change of heart (sarcastically).

He explains how the leftist MSM is outraged at replacement migration in non-white/European based countries and they understand the damage it does and will do in non-white countries but they choose to not equate it to the damage they themselves are doing in their anti-white 'replacement migration' agenda in white and European based countries.

If non-whites in non-white countries are against replacement migration they are lauded by the MSM, if whites are against their own replacement in white countries they are deemed nazis, white supremacists and possible terrorists..

Since I am in this thread anyways, was listening to the CBC radio channel yesterday and they had this child on talking about bullying and talking to a couple of 'professional' psychologists extensively about bullying in childhood and the potentially long term detrimental effects bullying can have that can extend even to adulthood and throughout ones life, sometimes also effecting their relationships with their own children.

Well that's all well and good, I think that someone being bullied by other children and youth (often) for years during childhood can have detrimental effects on the person well into adulthood and throughout their life.

BUT....then they actually had the gall to equate bullying with whiteness

Yes they actually equated bullies with race, specifically the white race, while speaking of minorities as being the victims of bullying by the white race.

This pisses me off. Using the issue of childhood bullying to slam whites and blame them for it.

The CBC continually have to use topics to slam whites somewhere in their programs but this is beyond the pale, as if white children are never bullied, as if no other race or ethnicity other than whites are capable of bullying other children.

So now not only do they preach that non-whites can't be racist but also that whites are responsible for childhood bullying with only minorities/non-whites as victims.

And this is being spewed by government and publicly funded programs.

With this mentality they will be blaming white children who are being bullied for their own bullying and if it is a white child doing the bullying they will blame it on his or her (white) race being responsible and if it is minorities or non-whites doing the bullying then they will deflect from it or make excuses for it.

What the CBC was actually doing was taking the issue of childhood bullying to bully white people. The CBC itself with it's government funders are bullies using their power to continuously bully people who are white....even while they do a program that is supposed to be against bullying.

School superintendent: White people have to ‘rewire their brains’ due to implicit biases

A Massachusetts school superintendent told a community audience on Tuesday that white people in our “systematically corrupt system that oppresses black individuals” need to “rewire their brains” in order to overcome their biases.

Pittsfield Public Schools chief Jason McCandless (who’s white) also blasted President Trump, saying that the commander-in-chief’s words “are being used to divide,” and that he “preaches hate on a daily basis … which is utterly unacceptable.”

McCandless’s comments were reported in a Berkshire Eagle story about his district’s plan to pilot black history courses this fall.

The courses taught at two district high schools, Pittsfield and Taconic, will focus not only on black oppression, but the “contributions black people have made to society,” according to teacher Jamal Ahmad. McCandless added that Pittsfield is working to better a system which has “long has overlooked the work and contributions of people of color.”

Along with the history courses, a teacher professional development seminar featured a college professor who enlightened educators about their implicit biases.

www.thecollegefix.com/school-superintendent-white-people-have-to-rewire-their-brains-due-to-implicit-biases/

Perhaps these courses could look at the contribution to knife skills in hand to hand combat over here in Londonistan.

annabelle wrote:
These stories are always interesting to read, they're like the facts describing some psychotic individual in a mental asylum... pretty much exactly the same thing.

I realize those poor idiots are merely exhibiting emotional malaise and then their narrative shouldn't be met with any rational resistance, but their behavior in and of itself is objectively strange: if in some universe U.S. blacks were indeed being systematically oppressed, then you would think there's a reason for that. Like, a GOOD reason for that. You wouldn't just be outraged by the fact and continually bark into the wall, I mean blacks are being systematically oppressed right so it's society as a whole that isn't naturally digesting them into its belly so there's necessary meaning to that rejection.
If you're trying to mix ingredients together for a recipe but it simply doesn't work, do you start yelling at your kitchen for it ? If you're trying to hook up two of your friends together because you thought they might be a good fit but it doesn't take at all, do you start yelling at one of them explaining to them why they should go out with the other ? Life doesn't work that way. You'd need to have the mental condition of a child to think that way, to have not grown at all intellectually or to have devolved back into a child's mind.

Please watch just the first 2-3min (or more...).

The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists.

The editors meant it when they replied to a reader, "Make no mistake about it: we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as 'the white race' is destroyed—not 'deconstructed' but destroyed."

harvardmagazine.com/2002/09/abolish-the-white-race.html

Noel Ignatiev.

Yet Another Jew Gives a Prescription for Getting Rid of White Gentiles

(...)

The book’s title is a misnomer: the only demographic shift presently occurring is one away from whiteness. Kaufmann forecasts a greatly increasing rate of racial intermixture:

In a century those of mixed-race will be the largest group in countries like Britain and America. In two centuries, few people living in urban areas of the West will have an unmixed racial background.

He does not argue that such a change is desirable; at this point, we are back to a rhetoric of inevitability. The only freedom he would permit us regards how we respond to this supposedly unavoidable future.

Kaufmann distinguishes four possibilities, which he calls fight, repress, flee, and join.

* “Fight” means attempting to avoid the inevitable, as the Japanese have mysteriously been able to do, by maintaining inherited majorities.

* “Repress” refers to intensified state repression of white opposition to their own dispossession under color of fighting “racism.”

* “Flee” refers to what has long been known as white flight, with whites colonizing areas where they maintain a supermajority. “Join” refers to a Brazilian-style acceptance of admixture whereby whites would continue to exist as a social category even as most become mixed to some extent.

* “Join” is Kaufmann’s own preference: firstly, to convince whites that resistance is futile (hence the inevitability tropes) and, secondly, to assure them their mixed-race future won’t really be so bad.

Kaufmann wishes to “draw the sting of right-wing populism,” but realizes that repression alone cannot succeed. “Conservative whites need to have a future,” he warns, because “even if [they] don’t win elections, they are in a position to obstruct change, damage social cohesion and, perhaps, pose a security threat.”

Once this white pacification is accomplished, however, the West “can begin to refocus on priorities such as democratization, climate change, economic growth and inequality” (which we are apparently not focused on enough already).

The book is divided into four parts, nominally corresponding to the possible responses of fighting, repressing, fleeing and joining.

read more here: russia-insider.com/en/culture/yet-another-jew-gives-prescription-getting-rid-white-gentiles/ri27546

annabelle wrote: Well, obviously you can tell it's a programmed plan (with brainwashing and manipulation involved) whenever it becomes generally okay to wish for a genocide, or anything that would otherwise be considered cataclysmic in nature. Like, it takes a bunch of accurate and clever engineering to make an entire population wish for the destruction of a civilization, or say for pedophilia to become widely accepted. These things don't just happen spontaneously as a natural progression in a society.

So they've done well incorporating just the right (considerable) amount of non-whites into Western countries so that they could push the narrative with barely any effort: ethnic/religious/cultural groups hate each other with natural fervor ; divide to conquer; easy peazy. A little bit of ultra-capitalistic consumerism and all the people cared about was their purchasing power, none of the values and all that unfashionable bullshit. Who cares if the buyer is black or white, as long as I've got my HD tv ? Green is all that matters. All they had to do really, was: max materialism+mass immigration=bingo. Half a century later, you're a monster or a madman for being conservative (or, normal). And the entire mainstream establishment is in on it: echo chamber, fear of being in the minority against the dominant current... Job done.

Bitchute link

Nearly 659 thousand of the 4.2 million couples in the Netherlands are mixed race couples, according to Statistics Netherlands. That means that about one in six couples in the Netherlands consist of a Dutch partner and a partner from a different background.

According to the statistics office, the number of interracial couples varies widely based on ethnicity For example, most couples with Turkish or Moroccan backgrounds are in relationships with persons of their own ethnicity. Only about 10 thousand couples in the Netherlands consist of a Turkish partner and a Dutch partner, and about 9 thousand couples are Moroccan Dutch That means that 11 percent of Turkish people in the Netherlands have a Dutch partner and 12 percent of Moroccan people. Most of these couples consist of a Dutch woman and a Moroccan or Turkish man.

While people with an Indonesian background seems more willing to partner up with someone of a different race or culture. Most of the mixed couples in the Netherlands are Indonesian-Dutch with 160 thousand, German-Dutch comes in second place with 154 thousand and Belgian-Dutch in third with 44 thousand. That means that 85 percent of Indonesians in the country are in a relationship with a Dutch partner, almost 89 percent of Germans and almost 87 percent of Belgians.



nltimes.nl/2017/01/20/sixth-dutch-couples-interracial-statistics-office

annabelle wrote:
Hmm lets see ....

How about we write a book detailing how to keep our nations ethnically intact and at the same time tackle the problem of the very small but very vocal and influential people , called Jews , who are openly advocating to " end the white race "

Oh wait !

Such a book all ready exists.