Your donations are appreciated and help keep this site running. Even the smallest amount helps.
Thankyou

 
PROMOTE YOUR SITE
HERE
Only $3 USD/month
TRUTHSPOON.COM
The man they can't recruit!
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: White Genocide

White Genocide 10 Jun 2014 13:18 #41

  • Macdon
  • Macdon's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Fresh Member
  • Posts: 43
  • Likes received: 94
.......... wrote:
^Thanks for that response....

Mixed kids seem to be thriving here in the US so it's hard to say.

My next question is why should anyone take this "white genocide" you speak of seriously?

I guess the main question is what is stopping white people from having sex and creating children?

Please respond briefly....
Many white people are disillusioned with their lot and they don't want to say it out too loud, at least that's the way I feel. I live mostly in Melbourne, Australia and to see what's happened to Melbourne in the last 10-20 years is quite depressing. Sub-continentals and Asians (Mongoloid Asians) have poured in and changed Melbourne forever. I don't want to bring up children here and I feel a certain unease if I have to re-incarnate here again. Whoever did this, sure did a great job of destroying white countries. I feel the usual suspects are just figureheads. I think someone like the Arab sheiks and their co-racialists - the Jews are responsible for this. Communism is their favoured tool for this - they use it to tell everyone they're the same and deserve the same rewards in this life, despite not being able to input the same effort.

From www.rense.com today of all days.
rense.com/1.imagesH/Sheeple-21-(R).jpg
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Orangeaid, Seaic

White Genocide 10 Jun 2014 14:02 #42

  • Seaic
  • Seaic's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Posts: 1915
  • Likes received: 2150
.......... wrote:
Your "reasons" are excuses, no white people with courage will buy into your theory on manipulation.

Please explain yourself because this is the most ridiculous thread i ever read.

Making excuses for white people not having enough sex, are you kidding me?

Meanwhile millions of Africans starve to death every year yet they never give up.

I won't engage with you any further until you read the OP.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

White Genocide 10 Jun 2014 15:24 #43

  • ..........
  • ..........'s Avatar
  • Offline
  • Straight Shooter
  • Posts: 10118
  • Likes received: 2864
Seaic wrote:
I won't engage with you any further until you read the OP.

I finally just got around to reading the entire OP.

I'm trying to be objective and create a healthy debate.

You make good points in the second half of your OP about Ethnomasochism, Cultural Marxism & Political Correctness.

It's hard to debate because i believe opinions are based upon where people live basically geographical location.

So let me here your solutions because you don't seem to accept mine which is white people simply having sex.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

White Genocide 10 Jun 2014 16:41 #44

  • ..........
  • ..........'s Avatar
  • Offline
  • Straight Shooter
  • Posts: 10118
  • Likes received: 2864
Seaic wrote:

Stop using the word excuse. I'm not making an excuse. An excuse implies, in this context, that white people have done something bad or evil and that I am apologising for it. I'm trying to expose the reasons why the white race is being wiped off the face of the Earth. Please show me evidence of cultural Marxism in existence in Mexico, Asia or Africa to anywhere near the same extent it is in Europe and the Western world.

First off, I'm white and never implied in any context, that white people have done something bad or evil.

Secondly Mexico, Asia and Africa have far greater poverty than Europe and the Western world.

So do you think if more white people lived in poverty our birth rates as a race would be higher?
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

White Genocide 10 Jun 2014 17:35 #45

  • Avacyn
  • Avacyn's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Senior Member
  • Hekara sisa widna sat ałiel
  • Posts: 1233
  • Likes received: 687
Trying to read your first post, Seaic.

I looked at the first video, with Putin. Spotted this. All I can say, this guy is full of anger and hatred.



As I have said, empty vessels make the most noise...

Peace, Light and Hope to you all.
Oh no... is it 3:36 again?
Last Edit: 10 Jun 2014 17:36 by Avacyn.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Seaic

White Genocide 10 Jun 2014 17:40 #46

Something I find very disturbing is the mass media double standards on racism, and racially motivated crimes. We've all seen it, and nobody can deny it. The media is always quick to portray any white on black crimes as racist (and some of them may well be racially motivated) I'm not trying to denying it, and of course all racially motivated crime should be condemned. Nevertheless, hate crimes perpetrated by blacks against whites is never reported as racially motivated, even though many clearly are racially motivated. The media simply ignores them. Why is that? This is all very strange coming from a Government and media who claim to be working towards improving race relations in the name of diversity and 'community cohesion'. So why the media silence on racially motivated crimes against white people? Why the media hush up of racially motivated crimes in the interest of 'diversity' and better cohesion/integration? What ever happened to honest journalism and common sense, where knowing and facing up to problems actually meant working on solutions for the benefit of everybody. That would be way to easy though, and I don't think the ruling classes want solutions. I think they want to hush up racially motivated crimes against white people because revealing the truth would be a massive blow to their one world Government melting pot utopian dream. In reality sweeping everything under the carpet and pretending something doesn't exist is avoiding facing up to the problems, that mass immigration is responsible for in the first place. Pretending something doesn't exist only perpetuates and exasperates the problem. Avoiding facing up to problems doesn't mean they will go away, they will only get worse. And I say this with good intentions and not out of hatred for any particular race.

I know racial hatred can cut both ways, I've got no axe to grind with decent black people or Muslims who don't hate on whites, and we're talking about a minority here that commit violent crimes against whites. My point being it's important we don't tar everybody with the same brush. I want to make that clear. However the fact remains that racially motivated crimes against white people are on the increase, furthermore they continue to go virtually unreported in the mass media. All we hear about is George Zimmerman shot Trayvon Martin etc etc.

What about the thousands of racially motivated attacks against white people that are far more violent and disturbing? That's even if the Zimmerman shooting was racially motivated? It all follows a very disturbing pattern in the media. A media that constantly reminds us all about all the joys of multiculturalism, but never reports the reality on the ground, the reality of segregated communities and such. A media that maliciously invents an appearance of white racism that often doesn't even exist, which then creates hatred and unrest on the designated ''victimized class'', thereby helping to drive the violence and retribution from both sides under a false narrative. The same media that instils a collective white guilt for anybody who questions these failures! It's insanity. There's literally thousands of Brutal race crimes committed against white people that go unreported in the mass media. Why do some people view debating this as ''racism''? It's not racism to debate one's legitimate concerns. Is it racism to say that many times more white women get raped by black men? No, it's a fact, and actually ignoring these facts is a disgrace and injustice to the women who were raped. Furthermore ignoring these problems is a direct failure to protect future victims. Does that mean I'm calling all black men rapists? Of course not, again it's a minority who commit these crimes, nevertheless the problem exists, and it won't go away by simply brushing it under the carpet and pretending it doesn't happen.

Why doesn't the media cover the genocide of white land owners and farmers in South Africa? Many of the most brutal race crimes simply get reported in the media as robberies ''gone wrong''. If it was the other way around, white people killing black farmers there would be international uproar. Do white people have any less right to justice than black people? Why the double standards?


Media Implying Whites Behind ''Knock-Out Game''

Corey Robinson was recently attacked and viciously beaten by a mob of blacks shouting “KNOCKOUT! …get the white boy… stomp the white boy…” in San Antonio, Texas. The local media employed all sorts of clever editorial tricks to hide the race of the perps.



For years we have talked about how the media censors black crime. Many major media outlets now openly admit to having a policy of censoring black crime perpetrators. However, an even more sinister form of censorship is rising.

This is what we call Stage 2 censorship of black crime. Where the media purposely leads you to believe that a black crime perpetrator was actually a white guy.

Jacksonville, FL is a hotbed of racially motivated black-on-white mob attacks and murders. We have been seeing racially motivated black-on-white mob attacks in this city for years. There was two more random mob attacks on white victims in February. Clear video of the suspects exists. However, the Jacksonville PD, which has a history of denying racial motive in black on white crime, is refusing to release the video.

News 4 Jax downplayed the hate crime attacks as “a game,” censored the race of the perps, and falsely insinuated that the perps are white.

News 4 Jax knows what race the perpetrators are. Even if their race was not listed in the police report, they interviewed one of the victims. We can tell that the perps are black because if they were actually white, the local media would be screaming it. If white thugs committed the mob attacks, then it would be a huge story and the race of the perps would be the focus of the coverage. We know that the perps are black, because the race of the perps is being censored.

News 4 Jax used an image of a white fist when talking about racially motivated black on white mob attacks. Not only did they censor the race of the perpetrators, they intentionally tried to lead the audience to believe the perps were white! incogman.net/2014/03/media-implying-whites-behind-knock-out-game/
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. – Marcus Aurelius
Last Edit: 10 Jun 2014 19:44 by Return of Zorro.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Seaic

White Genocide 10 Jun 2014 18:04 #47

.......... wrote:

So do you think if more white people lived in poverty our birth rates as a race would be higher?

People tend to breed more in poverty because there is less chance of them surviving. & having children is essentially about preserving the physical self in the only way <currently> possible.
Coz he's a dedicated swallower of fascism
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Seaic

White Genocide 10 Jun 2014 19:25 #48

  • Frothy
  • Frothy's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • True life is elsewhere
  • Posts: 16697
  • Likes received: 1744
If everyone on the planet was lined up in single file, the person with the most Negro DNA and physical features at one end, through to the other end where the person with the most Caucasian DNA and physical features stood.

Once that line was established if a random person is asked to step from the line and to make a mark where they think the position is where Caucasian ends & Negro starts in the population line, the two people standing either side of that mark would be so similar in DNA & physical features that it would make no odds.

That in mind, this thread sucks.
Once a hyena always a hyena.
Last Edit: 10 Jun 2014 19:39 by Frothy.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: hotandbothered

White Genocide 10 Jun 2014 19:51 #49

  • ..........
  • ..........'s Avatar
  • Offline
  • Straight Shooter
  • Posts: 10118
  • Likes received: 2864
Android Replicant wrote:
.......... wrote:

So do you think if more white people lived in poverty our birth rates as a race would be higher?

People tend to breed more in poverty because there is less chance of them surviving. & having children is essentially about preserving the physical self in the only way <currently> possible.

So do you think this is the underlying issue to the point of this thread?

Or do you agree more with the points in the OP?
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

White Genocide 10 Jun 2014 20:00 #50

  • Avacyn
  • Avacyn's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Senior Member
  • Hekara sisa widna sat ałiel
  • Posts: 1233
  • Likes received: 687
Blue_Tackler wrote:
If everyone on the planet was lined up in single file, the person with the most Negro DNA and physical features at one end, through to the other end where the person with the most Caucasian DNA and physical features stood.

Once that line was established if a random person is asked to step from the line and to make a mark where they think the position is where Caucasian ends & Negro starts in the population line, the two people standing either side of that mark would be so similar in DNA & physical features that it would make no odds.

That in mind, this thread sucks.

Blue Tack, why am I not surprised?

I don't like being negative about people, but your comments are consistantly and noticably inane.

:facepalm:

What the OP has said is reasoned, thought out carefully, and has been backed up with evidence.

In the six years I have worked where I do, I have seen people who are white become a minority. Those who are immigrants are merely trying to make a better life for themselves.

It is clear that European governments are deliberately orchestrating this. What the OP has done is provide one possible explanation.

This topic needs proper consideration and contemplation. I will ponder, and try to produce an intelligent, reasoned thought upon this thread.
Oh no... is it 3:36 again?
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: PFIZIPFEI, Return of Zorro, Seaic

White Genocide 10 Jun 2014 20:26 #51

  • Seaic
  • Seaic's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Posts: 1915
  • Likes received: 2150
.......... wrote:
I finally just got around to reading the entire OP.

I'm trying to be objective and create a healthy debate.

Which is fine, but it was impossible if you hadn't read the OP. Now you've done so, I'm happy to engage with you. :)

You make good points in the second half of your OP about Ethnomasochism, Cultural Marxism & Political Correctness.

It's hard to debate because i believe opinions are based upon where people live basically geographical location.

So let me here your solutions because you don't seem to accept mine which is white people simply having sex.

Your solution, though, is vastly over-simplified. As I've tried to illustrate, white people DO have sex. They just tend to use contraception, or abort the baby, which is a way of avoiding consequences. In societies where cultural Marxism is not so pervasive, there is less of the disassociation of sex from fertility that we see today. It wasn't always this way in Europe, because the Church, especially the Catholic Church, takes a strong view against abortion and contraception - which is probably why Ireland has the highest European birth rate, being staunchly Catholic and where abortion is illegal apart from if the mother's life is at risk. With secularisation, the Church's role in society is being diminished every day - and with it, goes morality...
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: PFIZIPFEI

White Genocide 10 Jun 2014 20:27 #52

  • Seaic
  • Seaic's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Posts: 1915
  • Likes received: 2150
Avacyn wrote:
.
This topic needs proper consideration and contemplation. I will ponder, and try to produce an intelligent, reasoned thought upon this thread.

Thank you, Avacyn. I look forward to your thoughts! :)
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Avacyn

White Genocide 10 Jun 2014 20:33 #53

  • Seaic
  • Seaic's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Posts: 1915
  • Likes received: 2150
.......... wrote:
First off, I'm white and never implied in any context, that white people have done something bad or evil.

But you kept saying I was making "excuses", and to excuse something means to try and hide it or lie about the causes of it. Anyway, we'll drop that because I don't want to get involved in petty semantics.

Secondly Mexico, Asia and Africa have far greater poverty than Europe and the Western world.

So do you think if more white people lived in poverty our birth rates as a race would be higher?

Yes, precisely. As Android Replicant says ;

Android Replicant wrote:
People tend to breed more in poverty because there is less chance of them surviving. & having children is essentially about preserving the physical self in the only way <currently> possible.

I agree with Android (never thought I'd say that! :D), and I'd also add in that with poverty there is less access to contraception and abortion, meaning more pregnancies and a higher amount of those pregnancies resulting in births.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

White Genocide 10 Jun 2014 20:45 #54

  • ..........
  • ..........'s Avatar
  • Offline
  • Straight Shooter
  • Posts: 10118
  • Likes received: 2864
Seaic wrote:

You make good points in the second half of your OP about Ethnomasochism, Cultural Marxism & Political Correctness.

It's hard to debate because i believe opinions are based upon where people live basically geographical location.

So let me here your solutions because you don't seem to accept mine which is white people simply having sex.

Your solution, though, is vastly over-simplified. As I've tried to illustrate, white people DO have sex. They just tend to use contraception, or abort the baby, which is a way of avoiding consequences. In societies where cultural Marxism is not so pervasive, there is less of the disassociation of sex from fertility that we see today. It wasn't always this way in Europe, because the Church, especially the Catholic Church, takes a strong view against abortion and contraception - which is probably why Ireland has the highest European birth rate, being staunchly Catholic and where abortion is illegal apart from if the mother's life is at risk. With secularisation, the Church's role in society is being diminished every day - and with it, goes morality...

Very good post i can't deny your points on contraception & abortion.

You bring up an interesting point about the Catholic Church and Ireland having the highest European birth rate.

So my question to you is do you think solely the Catholic Church is the reason Ireland has the highest European birth rate?

I ask this because here in America the Irish seem to be really thriving also and it might be more than the Catholic Church.

Living on the East Coast of America there is a very strong sense of Irish pride here in the cities and suburbs.

www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/03/17/the-irish-american-population-is-seven-times-larger-than-ireland/

^Here in the US the Irish-American population is seven times larger than all of Ireland combined.

How much of that is due to the Irish once living in poverty and having to overcome the British monarchy?

Seaic i'm curious to hear your thoughts on this.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

White Genocide 10 Jun 2014 20:51 #55

.......... wrote:
Android Replicant wrote:
.......... wrote:

So do you think if more white people lived in poverty our birth rates as a race would be higher?

People tend to breed more in poverty because there is less chance of them surviving. & having children is essentially about preserving the physical self in the only way <currently> possible.

So do you think this is the underlying issue to the point of this thread?

Or do you agree more with the points in the OP?

It's certainly a factor in declining birth rates for white people so it could well be yeh. I'm not sure it blames immigrants & Jews enough to appease certain customers though.

The OP is familiar white pride waffle that I've no time for.

I found this bit particularly bad:
The best and most concise definition I can offer you, then, is this ; people of exclusively native European ancestry. The white race does not include Jews, Turks, the Sami/Lapps, Roma gypsies, Armenians, Azeris, Kazakhs, Tatars, Chechen, Mexicans or Latin American mestizos. I am undecided whether Georgians, Maltese and Cypriots can be considered white. It does, however, include Greeks, Italians, Spaniards and every other Euro-Mediterranean group - to say otherwise is divisive, baseless, nefarious nonsense, designed to disassociate Northern Europeans from the glorious civilisations of Greece and Rome, and thus to denigrate them as little more than barbarian savages.

It's just ridiculous. It classifies people who on one hand could be as white as you or I or the OP such as Gypsies as non-whites, but on the other hand classifies people who could be physically non-white (such as olive skinned Mediterranean ) as white. Not only that, but apparently classifying them as not white means they are 'barbarian savages' - which is clear racism.
It's pretty sad tbh that people get so arsed by their skin colour and that of other people. I find it very depressing.
Coz he's a dedicated swallower of fascism
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: sketti

White Genocide 10 Jun 2014 20:59 #56

  • Seaic
  • Seaic's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Posts: 1915
  • Likes received: 2150
Android Replicant wrote:
It's just ridiculous. It classifies people who on one hand could be as white as you or I or the OP such as Gypsies as non-whites, but on the other hand classifies people who could be physically non-white (such as olive skinned Mediterranean ) as white. Not only that, but apparently classifying them as not white means they are 'barbarian savages' - which is clear racism.
It's pretty sad tbh that people get so arsed by their skin colour and that of other people. I find it very depressing.

:facepalm: I cannot believe you've just claimed olive-skinned Mediterraneans are not white. Would be laughable if it wasn't so utterly ignorant.

That's because you believe being white is about skin-colour, Android. It is not. Not even physically, seeing as different races have different skull shapes and cranio-facial structures. Olive-skinned Mediterraneans are white, whereas pale-skinned gypsies, Jews or Turks are not because they don't meet the classifications. Is an African albino white? NO! Why is that to hard to understand?

Anyway Android, the "barbarian savages" is a refrain I hear often from anti-white racists who like to denigrate me, as a Celt (therefore Nordic and not Mediterranean) as inferior to the Mediterranean peoples, and not the same race as them. I don't think non-whites are barbarians, but nice try at twisting my words. :thumbup:
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: PFIZIPFEI, Avacyn

White Genocide 10 Jun 2014 20:59 #57

  • Avacyn
  • Avacyn's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Senior Member
  • Hekara sisa widna sat ałiel
  • Posts: 1233
  • Likes received: 687
Android Replicant wrote:
.......... wrote:
Android Replicant wrote:
.......... wrote:

So do you think if more white people lived in poverty our birth rates as a race would be higher?

People tend to breed more in poverty because there is less chance of them surviving. & having children is essentially about preserving the physical self in the only way <currently> possible.

So do you think this is the underlying issue to the point of this thread?

Or do you agree more with the points in the OP?

It's certainly a factor in declining birth rates for white people so it could well be yeh. I'm not sure it blames immigrants & Jews enough to appease certain customers though.

The OP is familiar white pride waffle that I've no time for.

I found this bit particularly bad:
The best and most concise definition I can offer you, then, is this ; people of exclusively native European ancestry. The white race does not include Jews, Turks, the Sami/Lapps, Roma gypsies, Armenians, Azeris, Kazakhs, Tatars, Chechen, Mexicans or Latin American mestizos. I am undecided whether Georgians, Maltese and Cypriots can be considered white. It does, however, include Greeks, Italians, Spaniards and every other Euro-Mediterranean group - to say otherwise is divisive, baseless, nefarious nonsense, designed to disassociate Northern Europeans from the glorious civilisations of Greece and Rome, and thus to denigrate them as little more than barbarian savages.

It's just ridiculous. It classifies people who on one hand could be as white as you or I or the OP such as Gypsies as non-whites, but on the other hand classifies people who could be physically non-white (such as olive skinned Mediterranean ) as white. Not only that, but apparently classifying them as not white means they are 'barbarian savages' - which is clear racism.
It's pretty sad tbh that people get so arsed by their skin colour and that of other people. I find it very depressing.

Then what - in your opinion - is the correct definition of "White European," if I may ask?
Oh no... is it 3:36 again?
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

White Genocide 10 Jun 2014 21:03 #58

  • ..........
  • ..........'s Avatar
  • Offline
  • Straight Shooter
  • Posts: 10118
  • Likes received: 2864
Seaic wrote:

Yes, precisely. As Android Replicant says ;
Android Replicant wrote:
People tend to breed more in poverty because there is less chance of them surviving. & having children is essentially about preserving the physical self in the only way <currently> possible.

I agree with Android (never thought I'd say that! :D), and I'd also add in that with poverty there is less access to contraception and abortion, meaning more pregnancies and a higher amount of those pregnancies resulting in births.

I also agree with both you and Android Replicant here and i think the poverty causes people to value their children over materialism.

So when i bumped your thread a few times last night saying you were making excuses for white people i stand by that.

The reason is i don't blame Cultural Marxism for any of white peoples problems including this genocide you speak of.

If white people lose the desire to procreate at the same rate that people of other ethnicity do that is the nature of this life.

Survival is Survival, simple as that....It's the nature of the beast and that is just the way it is and also will be...
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

White Genocide 10 Jun 2014 21:20 #59

Ofsted are marking schools down and targeting them for 'improvement' for not being multicultural enough. Here's more proof of their agenda, which will no doubt be pushed with increasing ferocity in the coming years. Sorry about the source.

Village school given Low Ofsted Score for Being ''Too White''

A small rural primary school has organised a sleepover to London – so the children get a chance to see people who are not white.

Payhembury Primary in Devon was criticised by Ofsted for being insufficiently ‘multicultural’.

So the 68-pupil Church of England school is asking parents to pay for their children to make a two-day trip to a school with a wide mix of ethnic backgrounds.



The visit – described by one parent as patronising and bizarre – has been sold to parents as a way of boosting Payhembury’s Ofsted grade from good to the top rating of outstanding.

The school they are visiting, Smallberry Green in Isleworth, West London – where three-quarters of the 410 pupils are from ethnic minorities – achieved the same good Ofsted rating.

Explaining the motivation for the trip, Payhembury headteacher Penny Hammett told parents in a letter: ‘The purpose of this trip is to build up a relationship with a school in a very different community to ours.

'This will enable our children to gain a better understanding of multicultural Britain, which was identified in our last Ofsted as being an area for development. www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2651108/Rural-school-deemed-white-Ofsted-visits-London-mix-ethnic-pupils.html
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. – Marcus Aurelius
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Seaic

White Genocide 10 Jun 2014 21:29 #60

Seaic wrote:
Android Replicant wrote:
It's just ridiculous. It classifies people who on one hand could be as white as you or I or the OP such as Gypsies as non-whites, but on the other hand classifies people who could be physically non-white (such as olive skinned Mediterranean ) as white. Not only that, but apparently classifying them as not white means they are 'barbarian savages' - which is clear racism.
It's pretty sad tbh that people get so arsed by their skin colour and that of other people. I find it very depressing.

:facepalm: I cannot believe you've just claimed olive-skinned Mediterraneans are not white. Would be laughable if it wasn't so utterly ignorant.

That's because you believe being white is about skin-colour, Android. It is not. Not even physically, seeing as different races have different skull shapes and cranio-facial structures. Olive-skinned Mediterraneans are white, whereas pale-skinned gypsies, Jews or Turks are not because they don't meet the classifications. Is an African albino white? NO! Why is that to hard to understand?


Sorry I just assumed that colour is a factor of how colour appears & not some dreamt up completely flawed classification system. From your 'logic' anybody black who had similar cranio-facial features as a white person (given all the people in the world I'm sure there are many who are practically identical) could therefore be classified as white. It's just stupid. There's also a difference between census and social identification. This idea that cranio-facial features are somewhat a determining factor are complete generalisations.
Distance analysis and factor analysis, based on Q-mode correlation coefficients, were applied to 23 craniofacial measurements in 1,802 recent and prehistoric crania from major geographical areas of the Old World. The major findings are as follows: 1) Australians show closer similarities to African populations than to Melanesians. 2) Recent Europeans align with East Asians, and early West Asians resemble Africans. 3) The Asian population complex with regional difference between northern and southern members is manifest. 4) Clinal variations of craniofacial features can be detected in the Afro-European region on the one hand, and Australasian and East Asian region on the other hand. 5) The craniofacial variations of major geographical groups are not necessarily consistent with their geographical distribution pattern. This may be a sign that the evolutionary divergence in craniofacial shape among recent populations of different geographical areas is of a highly limited degree. Taking all of these into account, a single origin for anatomically modern humans is the most parsimonious interpretation of the craniofacial variations presented in this study
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8850181

Anyway Android, the "barbarian savages" is a refrain I hear often from anti-white racists who like to denigrate me, as a Celt (therefore Nordic and not Mediterranean) as inferior to the Mediterranean peoples, and not the same race as them. I don't think non-whites are barbarians, but nice try at twisting my words. :thumbup:

I don't care what 'anti-white racists' allegedly continuously refrain to you as if that's some form of justification.
Your words don't need twisting. They are explicit in what you imply.
Coz he's a dedicated swallower of fascism
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
Moderators: novum, rodin, Flare
Powered by Kunena Forum

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it. Secure transactions via paypal.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2019 - May 2020, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 278 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 160 - Raised
( £ 130 GBP )
donation thermometer
47%
Updated
2nd October 2019

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.