Your donations are appreciated and help keep this site running. Even the smallest amount helps.
Thankyou

 
PROMOTE YOUR SITE
HERE
Only $3 USD/month
TRUTHSPOON.COM
The man they can't recruit!
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie?

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 08 Aug 2014 16:56 #1681

  • Avacyn
  • Avacyn's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Senior Member
  • Hekara sisa widna sat ałiel
  • Posts: 1233
  • Likes received: 687
Hey, has the murder plan been posted up on here? Blue Tack seems to be having trouble finding it... :ponda: :pmsl:

Seriously, I have to thank Zorro for this thread, and taking the time to put up with my ignorance, and kindly hand me 5,000 hours of documentary to watch. ;) I can see now that there is a lot of lies, and that Communism is evil wrapped up in a red flag. Hitler a hero? A good guy? I'm not saying that. But he was clearly driven, and determined, that the German peoples had the best life possible. He also was open minded and tolerant. Ghandi felt he could write to him, and ask him to stop the war. If he was so much into Aryan supremacy, would Ghandi have thought of doing it, let alone writing a most civil letter indeed?

Truth never needs defending, because it can defend itself. And it will always, always resurface, even if it takes a couple of generations to do so.

Hope this helps to explain my thoughts on the matter.
Oh no... is it 3:36 again?
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy, Return of Zorro, Seaic

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 09 Aug 2014 22:39 #1682

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7961
Continuation of

British Girls in the Third Reich: 'We Had the Time of Our Lives'



"Nazi" Summer Camp, American Style



I have one great party trick. Anytime someone asks me if I’ve ever come across something really cool while working in the Motion Picture Preservation Lab, I tell them about the time we had what looked like footage of a Boy Scout camp and then the Boy Scouts raised a "Nazi" flag along with the red, white, and blue. Without fail, I get the attention of anyone in within earshot. Then, I tell the assembled crowd that in the late 1930s the East Coast was home to many summer camps for the junior "Nazis" of America and the National Archives holds the film evidence. They might have been hoping that I would tell them about footage of the Roswell aliens, but the reaction to “American Nazi summer camps” is just about the same.





In Volks-Deutsche Jungen in U.S.A. (German Youth in the U.S.A) you’ll see what first appears to be an unremarkable story of a boys’ summer camp. The film starts with the camp under construction and excited children piling onto chartered buses to make the journey from New York City to Windham, New York in the summer of 1937. The boys pitch tents, unload crates of baked beans, and perform physical fitness drills. If you pay close attention, you might notice that some of the boys are wearing shorts bearing the single lightning bolt insignia that marked the younger contingent of the Hitler Youth, but it’s not until the “Flaggenappell” (flag roll call) at 13:47 that the affiliation becomes clear.





That moment when you realize those aren’t Boy Scouts…



After researching what we called the “Nazi Boy Scout” film, I was able to find out a bit about these American Hitler Youth. First, they were most certainly not Boy Scouts. The camp the boys and young men in this film attended was operated by the Deutsche-Amerikanische Berufsgemeinschaft (DAB), more commonly known as the German-American Vocational League or the German-American Bund. The DAB, which came to include more than 70 local chapters, was founded in 1936 to promote Germany and the "Nazi" party in America. The most well-known of the organization’s activities was the 1939 pro-"Nazi" rally held at Madison Square Garden that drew a reported 20,000 attendees.

Less well-known is that the DAB also operated as somewhat of a cultural indoctrination organization for German-American children, with activities that are depicted in several of the films we hold. The summer camps, complete with the official uniforms and banners of the Hitler Youth, might be the most visual and chilling example of the DAB’s attempts to instill "Nazi" sympathies in German-American children. Another film, intended to encourage boys to attend the camp, includes a perhaps unintentionally ominous intertitle that translates to “German boy you also belong to us.” Even though it happened more than 75 years ago, it’s unsettling to see American children raise a "Nazi" flag and know that it occurred just 150 miles outside New York City.

Since these films were the property of an independent organization, you might wonder how they ended up at the National Archives. The sequence of events that led to the film coming to the Motion Picture Preservation Lab began when the U.S. government searched the DAB’s national headquarters on January 5th 1942. Under Federal Grand Jury Subpoena, agents seized scores of 16mm films and sound recordings that documented the activities of the DAB. The audiovisual material comprised what was labeled “EXHIBIT 147” in the case against the DAB’s un-American activities. These films and sound recordings are held at the National Archives as records of that investigation. An archivist discovered them in the textual holdings in the late 1980s and transferred to the Motion Picture, Sound, and Video Branch at that time.

A handful of the DAB films came to the lab for preservation in 2006, which is when I first encountered them. As you can probably tell from the video, Volks-Deutsche Jungen in U.S.A. is in rather rough shape. Excessive projection (probably while the film was actively used by the DAB) caused heavy scratches on the film, while time led to physical and chemical deterioration. We copied the reels onto new film stock to ensure that the images would be preserved into the future.

If you want to see more films of the DAB youth camps, we also transferred a couple of reels to show what the girls were up to. There aren’t any swastikas, but small German dogs abound.

Have you been surprised by something you found at the Archives? Let us know in the comments!





131-B-10


131-B-30

Source: blogs.archives.gov/unwritten-record/2014/07/31/nazi-summer-camp-american-style/ by Audrey Amidon on July 31, 2014
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 09 Aug 2014 22:41 by PFIZIPFEI.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy, Return of Zorro, Seaic

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 10 Aug 2014 09:58 #1683

  • Orangeaid
  • Orangeaid's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 11659
  • Likes received: 8021
It's interesting to look into the use of the word holocaust in jevvish biblical history.

From the New Advent Enclypaedia entry on the Jevvish Temple.

More over, it corresponds to all the requirements of Exodus (20:24 sq.) for the altar of holocausts. It is a limestone rock, unhewn and irregular, fifty-eight feet long, by forty-five wide, and standing three or four feet above the ground. Furthermore, in its upper almost level surface there is a hole whereby it is believed the blood and the water of the ablutions flowed into the cavity beneath to be carried off by a subterranean conduit to the valley of Cedron. The Mishna (Yoma, II, i) asserts that under the altar of holocausts there was a canal of this kind. This point admitted, the "sacred rock" will serve as a mark to discover the exact site of the house of Jehovah, because the latter opened to the east opposite the altar of holocausts and consequently west of the court of the priests which contained the altar.

And the actual description and practice of Jevvish holocausts. Of course, in WWII it is a term that the Jevvs decided to use to describe what had happened to them (supposedly).
As suggested by its Greek origin (holos "whole", and kaustos "burnt") the word designates an offering entirely consumed by fire, in use among the Jews and some pagan nations of antiquity. As employed in the Vulgate, it corresponds to two Hebrew terms: (1) to holah, literally: "that which goes up", either to the altar to be sacrificed, or to heaven in the sacrificial flame; (2) Kalil, literally: "entire", "perfect", which, as a sacrificial term, is usually a descriptive synonym of holah, and denotes an offering consumed wholly on the altar. At whatever time and by whomsoever offered, holocausts were naturally regarded as the highest, because the most complete, outward expression of man's reverence to God. It is, indeed,true that certain passages of the prophets of Israel have been construed by modern critics into an utter rejection of the offering of sacrifices, the holocausts included; but this position is the outcome of a partial view of the evidence, of the misconception of an attack on abuses as an attack on the institution which they had infected. For details concerning this point, and for a discussion of the place which the same scholars assign to the holah (holocaust) in their theory of the development of the sacrificial system among the Hebrews, see SACRIFICE. The following is a concise statement of the Mosaic Lawas contained chiefly in what critics commonly call the Priests' Code, concerning whole burnt-offerings.

Victims for holocausts

Only animals could be offered in holocaust; for human victims, which were sacrificed by the Chanaanites and by other peoples, were positively excluded from the legitimate worship of Yahweh (cf.Leviticus 18:21; 20:2-5; Deuteronomy 12:31; etc.). In general, the victims had to be taken either from the herd (young bullocks) or from the flock (sheep or goats); and, to be acceptable, the animal was required to be a male, as the more valuable, and without blemish, as only then worthy of God(Leviticus 1:2, 3, 5, 10; 22:17 sqq.). In certain cases, however, birds (only turtle-doves or young pigeons) were offered in holocaust (Leviticus 1:14; etc.); these birds were usually allowed to the poor as a substitute for the larger and more expensive animals (Leviticus 5:7; 12:8; 14:22), and were even directly prescribed in some cases of ceremonial uncleanness (Leviticus 15:14, 15, 29, 30). Game and fishes, which were sacrificed in some pagan worships of Western Asia, were not objects of sacrifice in the Mosaic Law.

Ritual of holocausts

The principle rites to be carried out in the offering of holocausts, were (1) on the part of the offerer, that he should bring the animal to the door of the tabernacle,impose his hands on its head, slay it to the north of the altar, flay and cut up its carcass, and wash its entrails and legs; (2) on the part of the priest, that he should receive the blood of the victim, sprinkle it about the altar, and burn the offering. In the case of an offering of birds, it was the priest who killed the victims and flung aside as unsuitable their crop and feathers (Leviticus 1). In public sacrifices, it was also the priest's duty to slay the victims, being assisted on occasions by the Levites. The inspection of the entrails, which played a most important part in the sacrifices of several ancient people, notably of the Phoenicians, had no place in the Mosaic ritual.

Classes of holocausts

Among the Hebrews, holocausts were of two general kinds, according as their offering was prescribed by the Law or the result of private vow or devotion. The obligatory holocausts were (1) the daily burnt-offering of a lamb; this holocaust was made twice a day (at the third and ninth hour), and accompanied by a cereal oblation and a libation of wine (Exodus 29:38-42; Numbers 28:3-8); (2) the sabbath burnt-offering, which included the double amount of all the elements of the ordinary daily holocaust (Numbers 28:9, 10); (3) the festal burnt-offering, celebrated at the New Moon, the Pasch, on the Feast of Trumpets, the day of Atonement, and the Feast of Tabernacles, on which occasions the number of the victims and the quantity of the other offerings were considerably increased; (4) the holocausts prescribed for the consecration of a priest (Exodus 29:15 sqq.;Leviticus 8:18; 9:12), at the purification of women(Leviticus 12:6-8), at the cleansing of lepers(Leviticus 14:19, 20), at the purgation of ceremonial uncleanness (Leviticus 15:15, 30), and finally in connection with the Nazarite vow (Numbers 6:11, 16). In the voluntary burnt-offerings the number of the victims was left to the liberality or to the wealth of the offerer (cf. 1 Kings 3:4; 1 Chronicles 29:21, etc., for very large voluntary holocausts), and the victims might be supplied by the Gentiles, a permission of which Augustus actually availed himself, according to Philo (Legatio ad Caium, xl).

Chief purposes of holocausts

The following are the principal purposes of the whole burnt-offerings prescribed by the Mosaic Law: (1) By the total surrender and destruction of victims valuable, pure, innocent, and most nearly connected with man, holocausts vividly recalled to the Hebrews of old the supreme dominion of God over His creatures, and suggested to them the sentiments of inner purity and entire self-surrender to the Divine Majesty, without which even those most excellent sacrifices could not be of any account before the Almighty Beholder of the secrets of the heart. (2) In offering holocausts with the proper dispositions worshippers could feel assured of acceptance with God, Who then looked upon the victims as a means of atonement for their sins (Leviticus 1:4), as a well-pleasing sacrifice on their behalf (Leviticus 1:3, 9), and as a cleansing from whatever defilement might have prevented them from appearing worthily before Him (Leviticus 14:20). (3) The holocausts of the Old Law foreshadowed the great and perfect sacrifice which Jesus, the High Priest of the New Law and the true Lamb of God, was to offer in fulfillment of all the bloody sacrifices of the first covenant (Hebrews 9:12, sqq.; etc.)
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy, Oracle, Return of Zorro, Seaic

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 11 Aug 2014 13:13 #1684

  • Return of Zorro
  • Return of Zorro's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Gold Member
  • Posts: 9660
  • Likes received: 8420
'Nazis': A Jewish Creation


Nazis are a creation of the jews: this probably seems to my audience like an out-of-character statement for me to make especially as I identify as a National Socialist. However let me explain myself on this score.

My point is simply this: that the idea of the 'Nazi'; the prototype of all evil in the modern world, is both firstly obviously a phantasm (i.e. a fantasy that has no basis in any sort of historical fact) and secondly a fantasy of the jews. That the idea of the 'Nazi' is a fantasy of the jews projected upon a historic country (the Third Reich) and a political creed (National Socialism) needs little defence if we but note that 'Nazis' are always at their most visceral and extreme as a stereotype among the jews.

The fact that this idea of the 'Nazi' has largely not clung on among popular literary tropes other than in their treatment of the jews and in jewish writing is suggestive of the stereotype's origin. After all it is not difficult to read the early jewish accounts of the pogroms in the Russian Empire from the 1880s to the 1920s and to see in their descriptions of the perpetrators (the Tsarist authorities and the Black Hundreds) a prototype for the modern 'Nazi' stereotype.

The pogromist is a callous creation motivated by jealously and irrational hatred of the jews into performing the most beastly of acts against them when given the opportunity to do so. The pogromist will bayonet pregnant jewesses after repeatedly raping them and any female jewess encountered (regardless of age), club jewish babes to death, torture rabbis by lighting their beards and fringes, force pious Chasidim to eat pork and so on. (1)

Sounds familiar: doesn't it?

That is because like the 'holocaust': it is a presentation born out of the troubled arena of the Pale of Settlement during the reign of the last members of the Romanov dynasty. These elements naturally form part of atrocity propaganda in general and more specifically Allied propaganda against the Germans during the First World War. However what marks out the 'Nazi' stereotype is that it is essentially a synthesis of Anglo-French hangover propaganda from the First World War that has been meshed with the jewish nationalist narrative of eternal victim hood and brutal persecution at the hands of non-jews.

As has been commented elsewhere propaganda of this kind is very difficult to undo and take back, because things said and popularly believed cannot be unsaid or popularly disbelieved very easily. Indeed the fact is that if we look merely to cinema as being representative the tropes of the eternally evil Germans turned into the nasty Nazis were still in use well into the 1970s and 1980s, but only then had the audiences who had been originally fed this information begun to die off and the popularity of the 'eternally evil enemy' (of the completely plastic and dastardly variety) begun to wane.

Such a two-dimensional view of 'the enemy' (so-to-speak) has only continued really among jews who continue to propagate (albeit often in somewhat more sophisticated form than the original) the stereotype in their own work as well as trying to get others to buy into it. Recent examples of this at the box office are 'Schindler's List', 'The Boy in the Stripped Pyjamas' and the latest bit of farcical nonsense: 'The Monuments Men'.

The reason that this has continued to be propagated among the jews is; as a biographer of Hitler observed in relation to the 'Hitler as Occultist' claims, (2) that to consider their enemies any other way than as two-dimensional 'Nazis' would be an invitation to consider the possibility that the jews share at least some of the responsibility for their own 'persecution' throughout history.

To even consider this possibility is to doubt the central defining element of jewish identity since the expulsion of the jews from Palestine by the Emperor Hadrian: that the jews have been eternally persecuted because of how unique (i.e. they are punished for disobeying Yahweh by his getting others to persecute them) or how capable they are (i.e. they are persecuted because gentiles are inherently less able and thus are jealous of the jews). Both come down obviously to a distinct sense of superiority over non-jews among the jews.

To doubt this narrative (and thus to doubt one's superiority over gentiles) means to doubt one's identity as a jew and as such means that the jew in question begins to 'self-hate' (to use Zionist parlance) as they begin to critically look at their own jewish heritage and thus begin to understand that what jews as a group has done has often smelt more of manure than roses.

Essentially to consider the opponents of the jews as anything other than 'Nazis' (aka irrational psychopaths who want to kill all jews because they are jews in spite of 'everything they have done for humanity') is to doubt one's self for your average jew. The stereotype is a necessary emotional and intellectual crutch for jews, because it allows them to continue to believe the unbelievable about their own history (i.e. jews never did anything wrong and were always wonderful) as well as their present (i.e. jews are eternally being persecuted thus all gentiles have an obligation to follow jewish instructions to cease the persecution or help persecute those who the jews say want to persecute them).

This irrationality in believing your opponents (of whatever stripe) to be ipso facto irrational is a way of rationalizing, contextualizing and justifying ones own behaviour as I will explain in the companion article to this one ('Why do Zionists behave like Nazis?'). However the origin of the 'Nazi' is nothing to do with National Socialism or the Third Reich, but rather to do with jewish perceptions of themselves being projected as the negative end of a duality onto those who they regard (rightly or wrongly) as their opponents.

We can see this in the fact that the description and tales offered by jews of the pogromists in the 1880s to the 1920s in Russia were the almost identical to those they have offered since 1933 about 'Nazis' and since 1945 about anyone who dares to criticise the jews or Israel. This then informs us that what we are dealing with here is not a factual representation of a particular sub-section of society or civilization, but rather a fantasy of a group who believe the proverbial bogeyman is eternally out to get them.

In essence then we can see that the concept of the 'Nazi' as represented by the jews today is not a factual one, but rather a fantasy of their creation which acts as a kind of make believe stalker following the delusional paranoids (the jews) around. There will never be an end to 'Nazis' for jews precisely because 'Nazis' do not have any existence other than in jewish brains.

semiticcontroversies.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/nazis-jewish-creation.html?view=magazine
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. – Marcus Aurelius
Last Edit: 11 Aug 2014 13:13 by Return of Zorro.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy, Oracle, Orangeaid, Seaic

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 11 Aug 2014 15:25 #1685

  • Return of Zorro
  • Return of Zorro's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Gold Member
  • Posts: 9660
  • Likes received: 8420
Why do Zionists behave like ‘Nazis’?


In the companion article to this one; ‘‘Nazis’: A Jewish Creation’, (1) I pointed out that the concept of the ‘Nazi’; as popularly understood as a kind of modern day paragon of all that was/is evil in the world is largely the product of the self-image of the jews. Since if the jews have done little to nothing wrong in their history (thus are whiter-than-white) then it stands to reason that there must be an antipode to that goodness in the form of an absolute non-rational evil that opposes this attempt by the jews to bring to light into the world.

This antipode is the concept of the ‘Nazi’, which contrary to popular belief; as I pointed out in the aforementioned article, isn't actually derived from or particularly based on the Third Reich or National Socialists. I traced the development of this stereotype back to the anti-Russian literature about the pogroms that was common in the years before the Third Reich gave jews a new enemy to assail and blame for their woes.

This then allowed us to understand that the idea of the ‘Nazi’; as a two-dimensional stereotypical figure, is a creation of a particular mentality that is almost unique to jews. It is the mentality that thrives on binary opposites and survives by listening to the loud claims (loud to make up for their lack of intellectual rigour as per the concept of Chutzpah in jewish culture) which are combined with a complete rejection of any criticism as being a necessary consequence of being either deluded by; or being actively part of, the negative binary opposite (i.e. the ‘Nazis’).

The mental reflex that provides the basis for this binary system and the often quite intellectually sophisticated (however increasingly desperate) attempts to justify it in the face of a burgeoning tidal wave of intellectual skepticism is linked to the need to believe in something greater than yourself. It is essentially the same mechanism that one uses when one takes a leap into the metaphysical darkness and says ‘I believe…’ one way or the other.

It isn't an intellectual position derived from sound deductive logic, but rather is a quite literal leap of faith that then feels the need to justify itself on every level imaginable and frame itself as a ‘light in the darkness’ or trying to ‘educate the poor benighted heathen’. The intellectual position which frames itself in such absolute binary terms acts in essence like the belief system of a religious fundamentalist in that rather than broach intellectual combat with their opponents with necessary intellectual concessions being made by both sides (per the concepts of the Socratic dialogue and the Hegelian dialectic). This intellectual position simply decrees that ‘one brick in the wall must not fall’, because if one brick falls then the fear is that the wall will become increasingly unstable and will eventually lose more bricks and topple over: quite possibly badly hurting those it protected.

A good example of this mentality can be given by looking at Christian fundamentalists who not infrequently wish to deny the results of empirical science when they run contrary to the text of the Bible. This is done both by sophisticated proponents who offer varying degrees of creationism and intelligent design as a way of providing a means for intellectual reconciliation between faith and empiricism as well as by crude fanatics who argue for everything from geocentrism to a flat earth in order to defend and/or justify their leap of faith.

Both groups of believers share a common inspiration in their leap of faith as well as their desire to reconcile faith with empiricism. The intellectually sophisticated attempt to marry the two together; however implausibly, as a synthesis (if you want to use Hegelian terms) and in so doing neutralize criticism or play down the fact that their conclusions reached a priori. The crude fanatic however simply rejects everything that doesn't according with their leap of faith and will often adopt whatever statements and arguments they can discern from whatever source (however problematic or fraudulent) in order to attempt buttress their leap of faith.
Most believers fall somewhere between these two poles being neither particularly intellectually sophisticated or crude fanatics: they share a mix of the characteristics of both groups in that they reject some empirically demonstrated positions absolutely, but seek to reconcile their leap of faith via synthesis with others. This then keeps the individual who has made a leap of faith as part of flock so to speak, because they are trapped inside an intellectual prism (or prison) of their own creation that would rather deny empirical reality than face it if it comes down to it.

Applied to the binary opposition that I have been discussing: this informs us that the average believer takes a little of both worlds. This means that they simply ignore criticisms of the jews that they subconsciously realise are difficult to refute and/or offer radical (and often completely implausible) alternatives rather than understand and address the substantiated criticism. While also trying to marry criticism of Israel with (what they regard as) prejudice against the jews: in order to synthesize the criticism of Israel into anti-Semitism (otherwise known as ‘new anti-Semitism’).

This synthesis allows the jews to rationalize their leap of faith in regards to the binary opposing view of the world that is embodied within jewish culture and Zionism more specifically (with themselves as the positive force and the ‘Nazis’ as the negative force). As rationalizations go the intellectually sophisticated jews are in almost a league of their own alongside the best of dialecticians and theologians in that they have made an veritable art form out of arguing that white is; in fact, black.

They have after all had an awful lot of practice over the years.

These intellectually sophisticated jews really do believe what they say, because they want to justify their leap of faith in relation to viewing the jews as being a whiter-than-white force for good that has been eternally persecuted by the ‘Nazis’. This thought process goes right back; in terms of its origins, to the binary opposition at the centre of Judaism: the idea of the jews as the chosen people of the creator of the universe and the evil spirit (the anti-force if you will) that has sought to oppose this design and tempt the jews from the path of righteousness at every turn.

It is represented throughout jewish history in their greatest thinkers, but most notably in the writing of Moses Maimonides who famously (if you follow rabbinics) asserted that of the two peoples that god had commanded that the jews exterminate: the Canaanites had been successfully wiped out, while the Amalekites had survived and were abroad in the world fighting, tempting and corrupting the jews at every conceivable opportunity.

This binary opposition of the jews versus the Amalekites is the ultimate source which informs the idea of the ‘Nazi’ in jewish thought and its influence is most evident among the crude jewish fanatics (most often the semi-deranged settlers or corpulent American jews trying to play Cowboys and Indians Israeli style) who reject any criticism of the jews (or Israel) as ‘anti-Semitism’ (i.e. as part and parcel of a mental landscape intimately tied to the ‘Nazis’) while loudly declaiming that these same ‘anti-Semites’ are part of Amalek (i.e. tacitly calling for their immediate extermination).

It is this contradiction that brings us onto why Zionists behave like ‘Nazis’ in so far as the crude jewish fanatic who refers to opponents as being ‘infused with irrational hatred of the jewish people’ (i.e. anti-Semites and therefore ‘Nazis’) then goes and calls for the immediate extermination of their opponents, because they are ‘Nazis’.

Solving this contradiction is surprisingly easy to do in so far as the crude jewish fanatic sees opponents as the negative position in their bi-polar intellectual world and in seeing the jews as the ultimate source for all that is good in the world: this requires that the persecutions of the jews (well prosecutions and retaliations against the jews would be more historically accurate) be viewed as murderously irrational and against the interests of the greater good. As such the crude jewish fanatics cannot allow more of the source for universal light; the jews, to be extinguished because of critics or opponents of the jews (who remember are ipso facto anti-Semites and thus ‘Nazis’) want to make their views about them heard.

To the crude jewish fanatic then the critic or opponent of the jews is the embodiment of the spirit of Amalek (if not a literal descendant of theirs) and should thus be exterminated. While the intellectually sophisticated jew rarely goes as far as to even refer to Amalek let alone call for extermination to begin post haste: the position they hold is drawn from inspiration from exactly the same source.

In essence this is a bit like the difference in the Middle Ages between the Inquisitor and the wandering Friar: the Inquisitor dressed up his persecution and punishment of heretics in intellectual terminology and complicated legal, political and theological concepts and systems, while the wandering Friar merely bellowed ‘Burn them’ at their critics and opponents.

The Inquisitor and the wandering Friar campaigned for the same object and derived their desire to rationalize and defend their leap of faith from the same source, but yet they sound so different. This is because those of different abilities and personality traits deal with having a conviction and defending that conviction in very different way.

The crude fanatic (the wandering Friar) simply wants to extirpate his opponents by whatever means comes to hand first making no bones about why he is doing so, while the Inquisitor comes up with complex and extremely sophisticated rationales for doing the same thing all the while making every pretense of equanimity and opportunity in relation to the heretic that he wishes to persecute and punish.

The same object is achieved that is derived from the same inspiration and leap of faith: what is different however is the route taken to get to that object and the form that route appears to take. The crude fanatic merely gives voice to what the Inquisitor implicitly believes, but is far too clever and cunning to actually make plain themselves. Sometimes the mask slips (as with Alan Dershowitz vis-à-vis torture), but this is the exception not the rule.

This slipping of the mask often occurs when the intellectually sophisticated jews are seeking to justify or minimize some act undertaken by the crude jewish fanatics: since sometimes to defend the actions of these jews the intellectually sophisticated ones have to plumb the depths of the intellectual world to come up with precedents and counter-arguments to make their case. This is both a display of conviction but also of the ruthless fanaticism that is the rough intellectual equivalent of crude jewish fanatics gunning down Palestinian children or throwing Molotov cocktails at Christian monasteries in Israel.

Intellectually sophisticated jews seek to dispossess and neutralize the critics and opponents of the jews (i.e. ipso facto anti-Semites and therefore ‘Nazis’) by claiming that the Palestinian people do not exist, that Europeans owe the jews a huge blood debt and that they were responsible for creating the United States as a superpower. This is merely part of an intellectual war on the opponents and critics of jews (as being the spiritual and/or biological descendants of the Amalekites) in order to justify the view that the jews are the chosen people and are thus incapable of doing wrong as well as that the responsibility for wrongdoing always sits with the opponents of the jews (i.e. the anti-Semites and thus ‘Nazis’).

This is mirrored in the behaviour of the crude jewish fanatics who act in symbiosis with the intellectually sophisticated jews by putting into practice the necessary consequences of what is preached and rationalized by the latter side of the spectrum (a bit like the secular arm frequently did the dirty work of the performing the actual burning for the Inquisitors after they had reached their convoluted legal-theological verdict). They behave like the ‘Nazis’ they claim to be fighting, because in order to beat the ‘Nazis’ then you have to be worse than them in order to terrorize your enemy into submission. This means; in effect, that the crude jewish fanatics are always attempting to ‘out-Nazi’ the ‘Nazis’, because they believe that unless they are beyond simply fearsome but actually inspire terror to actually fight then there will always be another ‘holocaust’ around the corner and next time might be the last one (hence the near-constant jewish paranoia about ‘another holocaust’).

Feeding this permanent sense of emergency that pervades Zionism; which is so aptly embodied in the constantly repeatedly mantra ‘Never again’, is this dualism of the powerless jew versus the powerful Nazi. The constantly expressed fear among the jews is that if they get too weak then ‘Never again’ will… well…happen again.

Thus in order to prevent it happening again jews; and more specifically Zionist jews, have to be stronger (and known to be stronger) than everyone else and in order for them to do this then they have to have a strongman ideology which is ruthless and willing to use the most brutal and vicious of all means and methods to achieve its objectives.

In all essentials jews; and Zionists in particular, are trying to ‘out-Nazi’ the ‘Nazis’, because they are genuinely afraid of the consequences if they don’t.

The irony in all this is that ‘Nazis’ aren't a real phenomenon, but rather a figment of the jewish imagination (i.e. a phantasm) that they have created in order to be the negative side of the equation (i.e. Amalek) so that they do not to have consider the possibility that they as jews might have performed, aided and abetted great crimes and injustices both historically and presently.

Instead of looking in the mirror and seeing the reflection of the true selves starring back: the jews are going around smashing all the mirrors that show them to be unhealthy, corpulent creatures rather than Adonis’.
It is a scary thought: isn't it?

All that anti-gentile slander, sanctimonious strutting and vitriolic violence just because one group of people couldn’t handle what they saw looking back at them in the mirror. semiticcontroversies.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/why-do-zionists-behave-like-nazis.html?view=flipcard
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. – Marcus Aurelius
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy, Oracle, Orangeaid, Seaic

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 11 Aug 2014 15:58 #1686

  • Oracle
  • Oracle's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Futurist & Anthropogenist
  • Posts: 3979
  • Likes received: 3241
Zorro wrote:
Very good essay.

Mr Radl summarizes it so well.

I have been arguing for a long time that "nazi" you see in Hollywood, is a mere reflection of the jewish mind.
They put themselves in German uniforms while being the murderous IDF thugs, so to speak, and the aware observer perceives it as such.
It is absolutely right, that the jews seek to destroy Amalek, that is all non jews nowadays.

A new and highly interesting TV series, which utterly reflect exactly the point made by Mr Radl is "The Strain".
A good jew in the CDC and an Armenian "holocaust" survivor fight an evil "nazi" virus in form of a modern Dracula, who came aboard a flight from Berlin to New York.
The series displays so much Chutzpah, first Armenian "survivor", thinking of the Young Turk crypto(Dönmeh) jews' genocide of the Armenian people. Then, they project exactly this mentioned self proclaimed goodness onto themselves, while this evil "anti-force" is introduced in flashbacks of the jew in some German train wagon and camp back in WWII.
The projection of Dracula himself onto the opponent, is probably the biggest Chutzpah, considering the black dressed eastern chabad jews, who are known for ritual murder and blood sacrifices.
There is then the "evil" corporatist introduced, who cooperates with the "nazi" dracula, who wants to live eternally, and is into organ harvesting.

For people who like to study propaganda, its interesting watch, as it tells more about jews than about the jewish perceived "nazi evil", millennia old, rationalized to be the devil in person by the makers.

Chutzpah, incredible Chutzpah.
The resident shill announced
blue_tackler wrote:
please make my profile inactive, I no longer want to have any connection to this forum.

yet he is trolling further. :facepalm:

blue_tackler wrote:
the lice are only going to jump onto other typhus victim

Prime example of holocaustianity mental issues, clinically insane, and utterly ill informed, a danger to public health if this dude was working for CDC.
Last Edit: 11 Aug 2014 16:24 by Oracle.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy, Return of Zorro, Orangeaid

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 11 Aug 2014 16:18 #1687

  • Voltaire
  • Voltaire's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 3516
  • Likes received: 2102
A yiddische sprach

" A ligner hert zikh zeineh ligen azoi lang ein biz er glaibt zikh alain."

for those unfortunate enough not to know yiddish (oy vey ist mir)

A liar tells his story so often that he gets to believe it himself.


Truth is anti-semitic
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Orangeaid, Seaic

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 11 Aug 2014 16:47 #1688

  • Voltaire
  • Voltaire's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 3516
  • Likes received: 2102
PDF of "Forged War Crimes Malign The German Nation (1989)" by Udo Walendy

ia601702.us.archive.org/16/items/ForgedWarCrimesMalignTheGermanNation/forged%20war%20crimes%20malign%20the%20german%20nation_text.pdf

just came across this - any comments from someone who knows it?


Truth is anti-semitic
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy, Return of Zorro, Seaic

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 11 Aug 2014 22:12 #1689

  • Voltaire
  • Voltaire's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 3516
  • Likes received: 2102
What if its true :chuckle:

US propaganda film

The Nazi Plan



havent seen all of it -just bits - bet its a classic - dl'ng now


Truth is anti-semitic
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 12 Aug 2014 00:20 #1690

  • Voltaire
  • Voltaire's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 3516
  • Likes received: 2102
I hope another post isnt considered spamming but this is a film with images of the germans going into poland - with american commentary lol
mods please let me know if i am going wrong.



Truth is anti-semitic
Last Edit: 12 Aug 2014 00:21 by Voltaire.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Orangeaid

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 12 Aug 2014 19:11 #1691

  • Return of Zorro
  • Return of Zorro's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Gold Member
  • Posts: 9660
  • Likes received: 8420


Reinhard Heydrich

By Wilfried Heink-

As mentioned, Heydrich was send to the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia as a replacement of Baron von Neurath, the first governor (Reichsprotektor), because of the latters failure to curb the unrest:

“The Reichsprotector of Bohemia and Moravia, Baron von Neurath, had resigned from his post ostensibly because of illness. It was a convenient excuse. He was a failure. Czechoslovakia, far from being the model dependency Hitler expected of a founder member of his empire, was sullen and uncooperative. Production had fallen; students had the impudence to demonstrate in the streets; it appeared that the puppet government could do nothing with these irascible Czechs.

Upon the 27th September, 1941, S.S. General Reinhard Heydrich arrived in Prague in the post of Acting Reichsprotector of Bohemia and Moravia to remedy this state of affairs…

Within a matter of days, intelligently appraising the situation, Heydrich had also wooed the workers. Of what use were these Generals and intellectuals to the Czechs, he asked? He appealed on an effective materialistic level. For just a little extra work, extra fat coupons, meat coupons and bread coupons could be won. It was a belly bribery almost impossible to resist. And if a worker really cared to exert himself, there were holidays at the best Spa hotels—once the preserve of the aristocratic and the wealthy—for him and his family, higher wages, and food. Always the promise of more food, Within a month, production, especially war production, was rising…

There was no curfew in Prague in those days (month later. Wilf). It was a very secure corner of Hitlers empire and the Czechs were a people that Heydrich was quite certain he had tamed.” (Alan Burgess, Seven Men At Daybreak, The Companion Book Club, London 1960, pp.39/40; 89)

This was of course a concern to the Brits and their allies (see part IV), as well as to the Benes Czech government in exile in London and plans were made to assassinate Heydrich. It was hoped that the Germans would react harshly and that the countermeasures taken would incite the Czech public. The operation was codenamed “Anthropoid”.

When the remainder of the Czech state was turned into a German protectorate, a large number of Czech soldiers fled, via Poland and the port of Gdynia, Hungary, the Balkans, as well as other countries, to eventually make it to England. There they were incorporated into the Czech legion, the army of Benes (Stanislav P. Berton, Das Attentat auf Heydrich vom 27. Mai 1942. Ein Bericht des Kriminalrats Heinz Pannwitz [The Heydrich assassination. Report by inspector Heinz Pannwitz], VfZ 1985, vol.4, p.675). Jan Kubis, one of the Heydrich assassins, belonged to a Czech resistance group, he was arrested by the Gestapo but was able to flee to Poland. In the refugee camp he met his co-assassin Josef Gabchik. The French had set up a recruitment office for the French foreign legion in that camp and both joined. Deployed in the western campaign, they were part of the forces who were evacuated at Dunkirk and thus also made it to England. There they joined the Czech legion.

When the British special Operations Executive (SOE), murder squads of the British Secret Service, were looking for people to operate behind German lines, Jan and Josef, along with 160 others, volunteered for actions in the Protectorate. In a six week seminar at Camusdarach/Scotland they were trained by the British to perform acts of sabotage, in hand to hand combat and also taught how to kill. In Manchester they had received a two week training course in the operation in wireless transmission and at the conclusion of the training they were send back to their units to wait for further instructions (VfZ, pp.675/76; Deschner, p.268, source: Charles Wighton, Heydrich – Hitlers most evil Henchman, London 1962, p.268).

Who was responsible for the assassination, the British or the Benes government? Burgess writes in his Authors note:

“I am grateful to the Czech Ministry of Information for allowing my visit and putting no obstacles in the way of my research. On the other hand I formed the definite opinion that because Jan Kubis and Josef Gabchik and the others were trained in Britain, and the operation as a whole was conceived in Britain, the present Communist regime tends—if not to suppress—then at least to play down the story. I am therefore doubly grateful to all of those people in Czechoslovakia, whose names I shall not enumerate, who helped me and gave me information”. (pp.13/14)

The truth is buried in those sentences. Following the war, the Burgess book published in 1960, a lot of subjects were treated as taboos. The “cold war” was in full swing and neither side admitted to any collaboration in the attempts to destroy Germany, the German traitors were ignored, it was in fact forbidden to mention them (H. Rothfels, The German opposition to Hitler, Henry Regnery Company, Hillsdale Illinois 1948, pp.20/21). The communists did not want people to know that it was terrorists who were trained, outfitted and transported by the RAF to Bohemia, that killed Heydrich, so it was ignored. Benes was not in the position to act independently, he had to rely on the Brits. We know that the Brits trained the assassins, but the “fair” British would of course not admit that they would order an assassination, therefore efforts are made to credit Benes with the planning of the assassination. Treachery is perfidious Albion’s game.

On December 29, 1941, Jan and Josef were dropped from a “Halifax” of the Royal Air Force near Plzen, three others near Kolin. Their assignment: The assassination of Heydrich and the blowing up of the Skoda factory in Plzen (VfZ, p.676). Jan and Josef eventually made it to Prague and started to plan the assassination.

As mentioned, the Heydrich’s had moved into a mansion in the village of Panenske Brezany, 20km from Prague. And, Heydrich was a creature of habit, travelling to Berlin often, either by plane or train, but always following the same routine. His driver would take him in the open Mercedes, the same route was taken and when he went to work he travelled at the same time. All of those strictly against all regulations, some of them devised by Heydrich. He had ordered that the backrests of the car seats used by officials be reinforced with steel plates, his Mercedes did not have them. Heydrich had done his job in the Protectorate, Hitler was impressed and since Belgium and Northern-France had become somewhat of a problem, London organized acts of sabotage in the countries, Heydrich counted on being appointed as top official to those places to work his magic. He was instructed to come to Berlin on May 27, 1942 to receive his new orders (Deschner, p.266).

London and Moscow were also aware of those developments, not surprising when considering the mass of traitors in all spheres of the Reich (Deschner mentions a resistance informant, p.270. Wilf). In March 1942, during a routine inspection security police in the Warsaw train station had arrested a musician on his way to Prague. His papers were in order but his brand-new suitcase aroused suspicion. In a secret department the security police found a disassembled, special gun. After lengthy interrogations the suspect admitted to being a Russian and ordered to assassinate Heydrich on his route to Prague or home. His story was taken with caution but before it could be confirmed, the suspect committed suicide in his cell (Ibid, pp.266/67).

The London plans were advancing satisfactorily, Jan and Josef surveyed the Heydrich property, in plain daylight and any observer should have detected them, nobody did. What happened to the guards deployed by Himmler? Plans to kill Heydrich en route were dropped, the car was traveling too fast and there was no place to hide in the open country. Thus, they were changed to have the assassination take place in Prague. Heydrich’s driver, on the way into the city, had to negotiate a hairpin curve, forcing him to slow down. Valcik, a Czech SOE agent had been placed up the street from the curve, to signal, with a mirror, the arrival of Heydrich’s car (Deschner, p.271). Josef was stationed just ahead of the curve, with an English machine gun under his coat, with Jan standing right at the curve, armed with a hand grenade.

The morning of May 27th was a bright and sunny. The plane that he was to pilot to Berlin himself stood at the ready at the airport, but Heydrich took his time getting started on that day. He counted on a longer stay in Berlin and the good-byes stretched out, he played with his kids, but finally, at 10:00am, he left. The assassins in the meantime were getting nervous, Heydrich should have arrived already, had the Gestapo gotten wind of their plan? Not so, at 10:30 Valcik’s mirror flashed and Josef walked over to the other side of the street. The car approached, Klein at the wheel with Heydrich sitting beside him, and getting close to the hair-pin Klein slowed the car and shifted down. When they were right beside Josef, Josef brought the gun out from under his coat, pointed it and pressed the trigger, but nothing happened (Here stories differ but it is believed that he had not completely disengaged the safety. Wilf). If the gun would have fired, Heydrich would have been riddled with bullets. Heydrich of course noticed the would be assassin and ordered Klein to stop. A fatal mistake and against his own instructions, which stated that if an event as this occurs, the driver should try and get away as fast as possible. As the car slowed down, Jan threw his grenade, it exploded just ahead of the right rear wheel, the grenade shrapnel piercing the backrest of Heydrich’s seat and wounding him.

When the car had come to a stop both jumped out to pursue the assassins. Jan tried to flee but bystanders blocked his way, he fired his colt pistol and they dispersed. Heydrich had pulled a pistol out of the door side pocket, aimed at Jan but the gun did not fire, Heydrich had forgotten to work the slide. Klein in the meantime had set out after Josef, but his pistol also did not fire, he had inadvertently pushed the knob to release the magazine. Josef fired at him, wounding him in the knee and Klein went down. Heydrich had in the meantime given up pursuit and returned to the car. There he stood, bend over in pain, completely helpless and alone. Did the people around him take advantage of the situation, did they settle their scores with “The butcher of Prague”? No, a woman approached him to help, a van was flagged down, Heydrich loaded into it and sitting in the loading area was transported to the hospital.

One of the shrapnel had entered Heydrich’s spleen, carrying along some of the horse-hair filling of the seats backrest. In the morning of June 4th Reinhard Tristan Eugen Heydrich died of blood poisoning, in spite of the best care possible. Penicillin might have saved him but non was available in Germany. On the evening of the 5th, a battalion of SS troops, as well as all of SD and security police officers held wake in the yard of the hospital. He was then transported to the Hradčany on a gun carriage, the streets through which the possession passed cleared of civilians, thousands of SS men lining the streets. On this night the SS were among themselves. On June 7th, the corpse lay in state in the yard of the Hradčany castle, a huge wooden iron cross in the background, the coffin flanked by bowls containing a flaming substance. High ranking SS and army officers provided the honor guard, the black and white SS banners at half staff. Starting in early morning, tens of thousands passed by the coffin, Germans, Czechs, policemen, workers, Czech farmers in traditional dress, the woman bringing flowers. In late afternoon a special train, carrying the casket of Reinhard Heydrich, left for Berlin. On June 9th, at 15:00hrs. sharp, the state funeral began, the most impressive celebration since the death of Hindenburg. All the dignitaries spoke, Himmler called Heydrich ‘irreplaceable’ and Hitler pinned the Highest German Order onto a black pillow (Ordenskissen), held by an officer. Only Fritz Todt had received it before, and it was not bestowed to anyone else. The gun carriage with the coffin, decked in a huge Swastika flag, was drawn by six black stallions, the saber and helmet of the man on top of the coffin. Himmler following right behind, then all of the other dignitaries, among them those glad to be rid of the man who knew too much: Bormann, Lammers, Frick, Goebbels, Rosenberg…(Deschner, p.302)

An investigation was ordered following the assassination, a reward of one million Mark offered. A curfew was put in place, Kurt Daluge, head of the Order Police, arrived in Prague but Nebe and Müller only send deputies. The investigations were unsuccessful, in spite of a huge effort. Reprisals were ordered, in Lidice, a town that had housed some of the “parachutists”, as the British trained Czech terrorist were called, was leveled, the men shot. Finally, on June 16th, the Czech Karel Curda appeared at the Prague state police office and asked to be taken to a leading officer. He gave the police the name of Josef Grabcik and Jan Kubis was then soon identified. They were holed up in a church, along with five other terrorists. On the morning of June 18th, the church was surrounded and all of terrorists shot, some died of the gunshot wounds later (Deschner, pp.311/12)

Comments: Some of the details vary, different authors give different accounts. What is of interest however is the time it took to finally find the murderers. Heydrich’s men had almost wiped out Czech resistance and were also successful in intercepting parachutists. Was the delay the work of people behind the scenes? Canaris had very good connections to abroad and it is possible that he had known about the SOE plans. Deschner writes that Heydrich was about to expose Canaris, the assassination prevented that. Then we have the police inspector Heinz Pannwitz, in 1940 appointed head of department II g (assassinations, illegal possession of weapons, sabotage) of the Gestapo in Prague. Following Heydrich’s assassination he was put in charge of the investigations, and compiled the final report (I have the report but this is a separate issue. Wilf). In the introduction to the report by Stanislav F. Berton, who found it, we read re. Pannwitz: “Das Ende seiner Karriere…kam mit seiner Verhaftung durch die französische Militärpolizei Anfang Mai 1945 in Österreich. Auf eigenen Wunsch wurde er den Sowjets übergeben“ (His arrest by the French military police in May 1945 in Austria ended his career. At his request he was handed over to the Soviets)(VfZ, 1985, vol.4, p.671). A traitor leading the investigation? The Brits, and Benes, had hoped that the reaction by the Germans would incite the Czechs, that they would rise up and make it very difficult for the Germans. That did not happen, but perhaps it was hoped that by dragging out the investigation, and by the continued repression, the revolt would start, even if delayed? Too many loose ends here, but I find it hard to believe that it had to take an informant to finally locate the murderers.

Did Heydrich tempt fate? Highly unlikely, he was convinced that “his” Czechs would not harm him. And they didn’t, Czech onlookers tried to get in the way of the British trained assassins and only when threatened with a gun by him did they give way. Heydrich was helped by Czech civilians to get to the hospital, would they have done so if the story of “Heydrich, the butcher of Prague” is true? Of course not, they knew that Heydrich had acted fairly and had improved conditions for the working people. No revolt broke out, even after the reprisals by the Germans.

The last chapter in Deschner’s book is titled Die Summe eines Lebens (Summary of a Life). He tells us that Eugen Kogon, a communist who had spend time in a concentration camp (KZ), has Heydrich as the inventor of the KZ’s, a fable. Jacob Burckhard, League of Nations commissioner of Danzig and who had only briefly met Heydrich, told that he had Raphaelian hands, made for slow strangulation. Post war allied propaganda has him as Heydrich the Butcher, but when considering the divergences a different picture emerges. Joachim Fest was aware of the contradictions and tried to build a small bridge for himself, claiming that Heydrich was a broken person, fighting his daemons. But that bridge can only carry weight if the Jewish ancestry supports are left in place, a legend.

Heydrich was the impersonation of National Socialism (NS) as a new ideal/model (without the Holocaust lie. Wilf). If NS would have looked into the mirror the picture of Heydrich would have looked back. Prof. Ernst Nolte, an expert on NS, stated that most NS personalities had an unidentifiable identity. Not so Heydrich, he was homogenous, he had an identifiable identity. He had been able to assemble the most intelligent NS people around him. He was not burdened by party politics but realized that for a revolution to be successful in an highly advanced industrialized nation as Germany – that it would be necessary to have people of intelligence and conviction in all important positions. Traitors and enemies of this new ideal had to be removed. “Two Vatican’s are issuing encyclicals today”, he told his officers, “one is located in Rom and the other in Moscow, and we are the heretics of both religions”. He was also not really committed to NS ideology, but instead to his conviction that a new order must be created. Hatred of Slavs or Czechs was foreign to him, he told German officials at the beginning of his tenure in Prague that pacifying the Czechs was his mission and that he would work with anyone committed to that. He did not spare Germans who were negligent.

Deschner claims that the transit camps in which Jews were sanitized and relieved of most of their earthly belonging were called “Aktion Reinhard” camps in his hono. A strange statement by Deschner, he does not refer to the Reinhardt camps as extermination sites, mentions only the confiscation of property. He also has the name wrong, his source: R. Kempner in Vorwärts of June 8, 1972, p.9. One has to wonder when the extermination camp story was concocted. But what about his Einsatzgruppen (EG), the alleged Nazi murder squads? No mass graves have ever been found by independent investigators. The Russians claim to have investigated, but not one of those graves alleged to have been found by them is on display, all we have are papers of dubious origin (F. Seidler, Das Recht in Siegerhand, pp.271ff). Prof. Maser wrote that huge areas in Eastern Europe, the alleged killing sites, are still today terra incognita, historians are reluctant to investigate out of fear not to find what is allegedly there (Fälschung, Dichtung und Wahrheit…, p.332). And only investigations by experts in the field of crime investigations should be accepted, not the efforts by some amateurs. We also have the testimony by perpetrators, that by attorney and economist Otto Ohlendorf for instance, who told his interrogators that his EG had shot 90,000 Jews, but this has never been substantiated, no grave ever found.

Heydrich does not come across as someone with a split personality, quite the contrary. This is why Deschner’s biography is ignored and a new one had to be produced by the Netsbeschmutzer and story-teller Gerwarth, something more compatible with the Zeitgeist. Heydrich was not a mass murderer, his personality did not lend itself to it. Neither were the intellectuals he had gathered around him, and since the murder story rests on testimonies and has never been substantiated, we can safely dismiss it as a lie. Heydrich of course ordered the hanging or shooting of enemies of the Reich, his EG did the same and yes, Jews were among those killed. He told his wife Lina: „Ich fühle mich frei von jeder Schuld“ (I am free of any guilt feelings). And he should be, his job was not an easy one and he had to make life and death decisions, difficult for him and Deschner makes that clear. But he never was “Heydrich the Butcher”.

May he RIP.

revblog.codoh.com/2012/09/reinhard-heydrich-5/
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. – Marcus Aurelius
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy, Orangeaid

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 13 Aug 2014 17:31 #1692

  • Return of Zorro
  • Return of Zorro's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Gold Member
  • Posts: 9660
  • Likes received: 8420
Benjamin Freedman's talk 1961

The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. – Marcus Aurelius
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 14 Aug 2014 01:31 #1693

  • Orangeaid
  • Orangeaid's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 11659
  • Likes received: 8021
DID JEWS KILL GENERAL PATTON?

GENERAL GEORGE PATTON’S MURDER on 21 December 1945 is one of the most concealed events in military history.



Although Patton’s military file at the National Archives in St Louis has over 1300 pages of documents, only a handful of pages are devoted to the car crash. Strangely, the 5 on-the-scene military reports of the incident disappeared shortly after archived. Why?

Patton’s end began on 9 December 1945 when after setting outon a pheasant hunting trip near Mannheim, Germany, a two-ton US Army truck collided into his Cadillac staff car.



Patton suffered neck injuries either from a bullet or less likely from impact but was not seriously hurt. Yet his driver, Horace Woodring and his chief of staff, General Hap Gay, walked away with barely a scratch.

On the way to the hospital, Patton’s rescue vehicle was struck again by another two-ton Army truck. This time he was injured more severely, but still clung to his life.

Neither of the truck drivers were arrested nor had their names disclosed although Patton’s driverstated that the first truck was waiting for them on the side of the road as they’d started up from a railroad track stop.

It was later reported by former intelligence agent Ladislas Farago, that the driver of the first truck, Robert L Thompson, (who was whisked away to London before he could be questioned), was not authorized to drive the vehicle and had two mysterious passengers with him “in violation of rules.”

Ladislas also pointed out that although the crash occurred on a remote road on a quiet, no-work Sunday morning, a large crowd of mostly military personnel quickly descended on the scene.

Once at the hospital, Patton was able to contact his wife in America urging her to remove him from the hospital because, “They’re going to kill me here.” And that they did.

On 21 December 1945, Patton was pronounced dead due to an “embolism,” that is, a bubble of blood which is fatal when it reaches a vital organ. It can be introduced into the bloodstream with a syringe by anyone with brief medical training.

Not only did the US army make no investigation into the “accident” - but no questions were raised about his “embolism.” The remains of this American hero were never brought to the United States and no autopsy was ever performed.



PATTON ON JEWRY’S HIT LIST

WHEN PATTON ASSUMED COMMAND of occupied Germany in October 1945, he came to a new understanding of the European conflagration.

The war hero expressed grave misgivings regarding the harsh treatment of Germans by the Allies and urged creating a strong Germany to counter the advance of Soviet Russia into Eastern Europe.

The more Patton saw of the Soviets, the stronger his conviction grew that the right course of action was to stifle communism while the opportunity was ripe.

But Patton was thwarted by Roosevelt’s Jewish advisers, Henry Morgenthau and Bernard Baruch, who pursued a post-war bond with Jewish-Soviets.

The conflict between Jewry and Patton grew when he refused to remove German civilians from their homes so as to house “Displaced Persons.” Most of these were Jews who were never “displaced” but rather had swarmed into Germany from Poland and Russia.

Patton’s diary entry for 17 September 1945 reads:

“The virus started by Morgenthau and Baruch against all Germans is semitic revenge. Now I’m being ordered to remove German civilians from their homes for the purpose of housing Displaced Persons.

It appears that this order is to punish the German race and not individual Germans. It’s against my Anglo-Saxon conscience to remove a person from his house without due process of the law.

Those issuing these orders believe that the Displaced Person is a human being, which he is not. This applies particularly to the Jews, who are lost to all decency, relieving themselves on the floors, showing themselves to be lower than animals.” 


When Patton later linked Communists with Jews, his fate was sealed. The Jewish-owned press in America began a smear campaign describing Patton as “soft on Nazis.”

General Patton had always carried with him a special notebook. It disappeared from his pocket upon his arrival at the hospital after the collisions.

“I have a little black book in my pocket,” Patton once said, “and when I get back home I’m going to blow the hell out of everything.” But Jewry made sure Patton would never see America again.

JEWRY’S REVENGE

IN HIS BOOK, “Target Patton,” author Robert Wilcox describes his interviews with WWII sharpshooter, Douglas Bazata, a Lebanese Jew, who died in 1999.

Based on these interviews, (Bazata, with declining health, wastormented by qualms of conscience), Wilcox details how the marksman staged the car crash by getting a troop truck to plough into Patton’s Cadillac.

He then arranged for the General to be shot with a low-velocity projectile which entered Patton’s neck while his fellow passengers escaped without a scratch. (The impact theory is less likely since the vehicles were advancing at only 20 miles per hour, both being hardly damaged.)

Bazata said that the order “to silence Patton” was given by the head of the OSS, (forerunner to the CIA), General “Wild Bill” Donovan, who was pursuing close ties with Communist intelligence officers.

Donovan told Bazata, “We’ve got a terrible situation with this great patriot, he’s out of control and we must save him from himself and from ruining everything the allies have done.”

The marksman gave similar testimony to a group of 450 ex-members of the OSS at the Hilton Hotel in Washington on 25 September 1979.

Bazata said, “Many high-ranking military persons hated Patton. I know who killed him because I was hired to set up the accident by General William Donovan for $10,000. But since Patton didn’t die in the accident, he was kept in isolation in the hospital where he was killed with an injection.”


General Bill Donovan is alleged to have been a crypto Jew, as his mother, Anna Letitia Donovan, was likely a Jewess. Her name, “Anna Letitia,” is typically Jewish but uncommon as an Irish name.

Donovan’s rise as a Wall Street lawyer, his intimacy with FDR’sJewish inner circle, and his role as adjunct to Jewish Judge Samuel Rosenman at the Nuremberg trials, strengthens the premise of Donovan’s Jewish identity, or at least, his Jewish sympathies.

And those “sympathies” felled a great American hero through the intrigues of the dark forces of international Jewry now pervasive in our post WWII world.

www.realjewnews.com/?p=594
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy, Return of Zorro

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 19 Aug 2014 20:50 #1694

  • Oracle
  • Oracle's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Futurist & Anthropogenist
  • Posts: 3979
  • Likes received: 3241
Oracle wrote:
Two must read books for historically interested people.




Interview with Victor Suvorov
www.jrnyquist.com/suvorov-part-1.html
www.jrnyquist.com/suvorov-part-2.html





This is Viktor Suvorov's book presentation at the United States Naval Academy on October 7, 2009
The resident shill announced
blue_tackler wrote:
please make my profile inactive, I no longer want to have any connection to this forum.

yet he is trolling further. :facepalm:

blue_tackler wrote:
the lice are only going to jump onto other typhus victim

Prime example of holocaustianity mental issues, clinically insane, and utterly ill informed, a danger to public health if this dude was working for CDC.
Last Edit: 19 Aug 2014 20:51 by Oracle.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Orangeaid

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 21 Aug 2014 17:52 #1695

  • Return of Zorro
  • Return of Zorro's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Gold Member
  • Posts: 9660
  • Likes received: 8420


The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. – Marcus Aurelius
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 25 Aug 2014 11:28 #1696

  • Oracle
  • Oracle's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Futurist & Anthropogenist
  • Posts: 3979
  • Likes received: 3241
How true.


Russian and German people have lots in common. They are similar in their spirit, their values, their views of life. Unfortunately in the past they've been divided and forced into confrontation. They've been set apart and made enemy. Fortunately with the beginning of a new era the two great nations have a chance to unite and change the world for the better. The global awakening helps people to realise that the humanity has one common enemies - The Dark Directors, who organise all the wars and revolutions in the world, but always stay behind the scene. Strizhak calls them "nomads", the ones who "proliferated around the world as a malignant tumor metastases".
When German Wolf and Russian Bear get together - the world will turn over.

An extract from a documentary by Crimean film maker Sergey Strizhak - "Crimea. The Rusian Sea." (2014) - an extended 9 parts project about Crimean peninsula, its history and less known facts, its mysteries and hidden secrets.
This episode is from film No. 7 dedicated to the Second World War and severe battles in Crimea.
The resident shill announced
blue_tackler wrote:
please make my profile inactive, I no longer want to have any connection to this forum.

yet he is trolling further. :facepalm:

blue_tackler wrote:
the lice are only going to jump onto other typhus victim

Prime example of holocaustianity mental issues, clinically insane, and utterly ill informed, a danger to public health if this dude was working for CDC.
Last Edit: 25 Aug 2014 11:50 by Oracle.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 25 Aug 2014 11:59 #1697

  • Orangeaid
  • Orangeaid's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 11659
  • Likes received: 8021
This is from Cracked, but it makes a good read. Churchill was rated no. 4 on the Cracked list of the top 5 general perceptions about WWII that are actually bullshit. Can people validate what is being said about Churchill?
#4. Winston Churchill Was the Universally Beloved Leader of the Good Guys

Claimed By:

Biographers, [English] historians, skewed opinion polls and people who have never heard of British Raj

Why it's Bullshit:



Churchill was great at giving wartimes speeches, and no doubt was an effective cheerleader for England while the Nazis were bombing the shit out of London. But his popularity didn't extend very far beyond a psychological concept called the "rally round the flag" effect, which significantly reduces criticisms of a character/government post-crisis. Remember when George W. Bush's approval ratings shot past 80 percent after 9/11?



It didn't last, and Churchill immediately was booted from office just months after Germany surrendered. Why?

Churchill suffered from an insatiable urge similar to "bloodlust" in Warcaft to keep fighting WWII for as long as he felt like it. Since this meant millions of men would be dying for his ego, it made him quite unpopular within the British military. Churchill's craziest scheme: A preemptive invasion of Russia on July 1, 1945 with the help of re-armed German forces. Yes, he wanted to start World War III before we had even started shoveling the rubble of WWII. It was his aptly-named Operation Unthinkable, and even his closest supporters thought it was batshit insane.


As for Churchill the Prime Minister, Brits began experiencing a bit of an "oh shit" feeling when it hit them that they might be stuck with the nutcase in peacetime. Winnie didn't make this anxiety any easier for himself, calling his Labour opponents "Gestapo" even though they served key posts in his war cabinet. Thus Britons promptly responded in 1945 by kicking his enormous ass out of office in one of the most spectacular electoral defeats in history.

Nevertheless, Churchill did enjoy high approval ratings from his people... that is, if you ignore the 400 millioninhabitants of British Raj, present-day Pakistan, Bangladesh, Myanmar and, the big one, India. By Churchill's own standards, these people were part of the British Empire (including all those poor villagers inIndiana Jones and the Temple of Doom), yet he was a fierce opponent to any kind of Indian autonomy.

The country was forced into World War II, and its leaders arrested if they protested. Churchill even took a hard-line against Mohandas Gandhi, going so far as to advocate" letting Gandhi starve to death" during his hunger strikes.

www.cracked.com/article_18389_the-5-most-widely-believed-wwii-facts-that-are-bullshit.html
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 25 Aug 2014 12:12 #1698

  • Oracle
  • Oracle's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Futurist & Anthropogenist
  • Posts: 3979
  • Likes received: 3241
Orangeaid wrote:
Approximately 3 million people died due to famine.[1][2] Generally the estimates are between 1.5 and 4 million,

By August 1943 Churchill refused to release shipping to send food to India.[64][65][66] Initially during the famine he was more concerned with the civilians of Nazi occupied Greece (who were also suffering from a famine) compared with the Bengalis,[67] noting that the “starvation of anyhow underfed Bengalis is less serious than that of sturdy Greeks”
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bengal_famine_of_1943

As always, wikipedia is guilty of omission and concealing the true story and facts.
The resident shill announced
blue_tackler wrote:
please make my profile inactive, I no longer want to have any connection to this forum.

yet he is trolling further. :facepalm:

blue_tackler wrote:
the lice are only going to jump onto other typhus victim

Prime example of holocaustianity mental issues, clinically insane, and utterly ill informed, a danger to public health if this dude was working for CDC.
Last Edit: 25 Aug 2014 15:42 by Oracle.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Orangeaid

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 25 Aug 2014 12:42 #1699

  • Orangeaid
  • Orangeaid's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 11659
  • Likes received: 8021
BRITISH PRIME MINISTER CHURCHILL BETRAYS AUSTRALIA AT THE ARCADIA CONFERENCE

WINSTON CHURCHILL - NO FRIEND TO AUSTRALIA

Although happy to take all the sailors, soldiers and airmen that Australia was prepared to place at his disposal for the defence of Britain, Churchill had no concern about Australia's fate when Japan's conquering armies menaced Australia. His assurances of British military support for Australia against the Japanese were lies. He had already betrayed Australia to the Japanese at the Arcadia Conference held in Washington in late December 1941. Churchill even resisted the return of Australian troops from the Middle East to defend their own country; he wanted to use them In Burma to defend India against the advancing Japanese.

Before Pearl Harbor, President Franklin D. Roosevelt is persuaded to adopt a "Germany First" war strategy

Less than two weeks after he won an unprecedented third term in office in November 1940, President Franklin D. Roosevelt received a private briefing from the Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral Harold R. Stark. Stark warned Roosevelt that failure by the United States to aid Britain against Germany would almost certainly lead to Britain's defeat and German domination of the whole of Europe, the Middle East and Africa. Stark argued that American aid to Britain should include actual participation in the war in Europe and North Africa by US armed forces. Stark also argued that top priority should be given to defeating Germany regardless of any threat that might arise from Japan.

Read more
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 28 Aug 2014 20:29 #1700

  • Voltaire
  • Voltaire's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 3516
  • Likes received: 2102
Book Burning

Need help - anyone (plus sources) to explain this event in Germany in the 1930s

It is attributed to NSDAP policy yet I think martin or clark on spingola said the books burned were still available to the public after the even

Has anyone got links / etc to explain what really went on?


Truth is anti-semitic
Last Edit: 28 Aug 2014 20:29 by Voltaire. Reason: explanation
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
Moderators: novum, rodin, Flare
Powered by Kunena Forum

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it. Secure transactions via paypal.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2019 - May 2020, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 263 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 239 - Raised
( £ 185 GBP )
donation thermometer
70%
Updated
27th February 2020

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.