Your donations are appreciated and help keep this site running. Even the smallest amount helps.
Thankyou

 
PROMOTE YOUR SITE
HERE
Only $3 USD/month
TRUTHSPOON.COM
The man they can't recruit!
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie?

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 02 Sep 2020 19:13 #4701

  • MrAnderson
  • MrAnderson's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • BOXING FOR PEACE
  • Posts: 4545
  • Likes received: 1703
EW wrote:


The attraction is an androgynous looking figure too, talk about nail on the head.

with Bridgette Bardot having been put in prison multiple times for the.crime of loving France , the poster was off by nearly 30 years
isaiah 47 : 10

10 You felt secure in your wickedness;
you said, “No one sees me”;
your wisdom and your knowledge led you astray,
and you said in your heart,
“I am, and there is no one besides me.”
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Truthspoon, EW

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 03 Sep 2020 01:01 #4702

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 16339
  • Likes received: 6101
What Robert Ley said about Bolshevism


Last Edit: 03 Sep 2020 01:02 by Flare.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy, MrAnderson

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 03 Sep 2020 08:16 #4703

  • MrAnderson
  • MrAnderson's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • BOXING FOR PEACE
  • Posts: 4545
  • Likes received: 1703
www.bitchute.com/video/QZAcfCuFYDCR/

Adam Green hosts a debate between Christopher Bjerknes and Dennis Wise

My personal take on it is that Bjerknes rage quits way too often for a man who believes himself to be correct.

He also employs too early in the debate the usual :

1. You are an ignoramus

2. This guy is a clown

3. Your a lying propagandist

I began to distrust Christopher when he tried to state that


A. Freemasonry is not a jewish creation

B. There were no Soviet forces amassed ready to invade Germany ( there blatantly was )

B. Communism has never happened , The USSR was not communism

C. There were no commumists in China for Japan to fight ( then admits there were indeed at the time )

He is also trying to blame Hitler for the creation of Israel , and I have to say I dont know why the Balfour Decleration was not raised ?
isaiah 47 : 10

10 You felt secure in your wickedness;
you said, “No one sees me”;
your wisdom and your knowledge led you astray,
and you said in your heart,
“I am, and there is no one besides me.”
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 04 Sep 2020 03:12 #4704

  • Lizzy
  • Lizzy's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 4995
  • Likes received: 3035
Flare wrote:
Truth Will Out Radio: Heinrich Himmler



Sven Longshanks and Dennis Wise discuss Heinrich Himmler and the lies told about him.

Dennis is still unwell, so this a remixed episode made from previous episodes about Himmler.

The episode starts with quotes from Himmler about Christianity and moves into answers that his daughter gave when talking about her father.


Presented by Sven Longshanks and Dennis Wise



:right: archive.radioalbion.com/TWOR/TWOR%20081420.mp3

He gets it wrong about paganism .
Last Edit: 04 Sep 2020 06:09 by Lizzy.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 04 Sep 2020 03:52 #4705

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 18577
  • Likes received: 8730
MrAnderson wrote:
He is also trying to blame Hitler for the creation of Israel , and I have to say I dont know why the Balfour Decleration was not raised ?

It is quite obvious that zionist jews got it in their heads to relocate jews to palestine before Hitler was even born, and it picked up steam when he was a young boy.

Point is they were already hell bent on making it happen.

The rothschilds and montefiores etc were spending money to fund settlements in Palestine before ww2 and even before 1889;



QUOTE:
In 1850, Palestine had about 350,000 inhabitants. Roughly 85% were Muslims, 11% were Christians and 4% Jews.

In 1854, Judah Touro bequeathed money to fund Jewish residential settlement in Palestine. Sir Moses Montefiore was appointed executor of his will, and used the funds for a variety of projects, including building the first Jewish residential settlement and almshouse outside of the old walled city of Jerusalem in 1860, which is known today as Mishkenot Sha'ananim quarter.

In 1882, a group of Hovevei Zion enthusiasts which included noted philanthropist Isaac Leib Goldberg founded Rishon LeZion, the first Zionist settlement in the Land of Israel,[6]despite obstacles posed by the Turkish government, which hindered the purchase of land.

Later, Bilu pioneers strengthened the settlement and enlarged it. For many years, textbooks gave Bilu the credit for the establishment of Rishon LeZion, but in the last decades — after a campaign by the veterans of Rishon and their descendants — Hovevei Zion were given the credit as the founders of the city.

The Hovevei Zion tract Aruchas bas-ami was authored by Isaac Rülf in 1883, and in 1884, 34 delegates met in Kattowitz, Germany (today Katowice, Poland). Rabbi Samuel Mohilever was elected the president and Leon Pinsker the chairman of the organization they named Hovevei Zion.

The group tried to secure financial help from Baron Edmond James de Rothschild and other philanthropists to aid Jewish settlements in Palestine and to organize educational courses. In June 1887, another conference was held in Druskininkai.

Read More: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hovevei_Zion

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Zionism
I remember the good old days, when 90+ year olds in nursing homes lived forever. Darn this pesky virus.

1365 = 1

1.1365 = 1,283,305,580,313,352
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy, MrAnderson

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 04 Sep 2020 04:15 #4706

  • MrAnderson
  • MrAnderson's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • BOXING FOR PEACE
  • Posts: 4545
  • Likes received: 1703
novum wrote:
MrAnderson wrote:
He is also trying to blame Hitler for the creation of Israel , and I have to say I dont know why the Balfour Decleration was not raised ?

It is quite obvious that zionist jews got it in their heads to relocate jews to palestine before Hitler was even born, and it picked up steam when he was a young boy.

Point is they were already hell bent on making it happen.

The rothschilds and montefiores etc were spending money to fund settlements in Palestine before ww2 and even before 1889;



QUOTE:
In 1850, Palestine had about 350,000 inhabitants. Roughly 85% were Muslims, 11% were Christians and 4% Jews.

In 1854, Judah Touro bequeathed money to fund Jewish residential settlement in Palestine. Sir Moses Montefiore was appointed executor of his will, and used the funds for a variety of projects, including building the first Jewish residential settlement and almshouse outside of the old walled city of Jerusalem in 1860, which is known today as Mishkenot Sha'ananim quarter.

In 1882, a group of Hovevei Zion enthusiasts which included noted philanthropist Isaac Leib Goldberg founded Rishon LeZion, the first Zionist settlement in the Land of Israel,[6]despite obstacles posed by the Turkish government, which hindered the purchase of land.

Later, Bilu pioneers strengthened the settlement and enlarged it. For many years, textbooks gave Bilu the credit for the establishment of Rishon LeZion, but in the last decades — after a campaign by the veterans of Rishon and their descendants — Hovevei Zion were given the credit as the founders of the city.

The Hovevei Zion tract Aruchas bas-ami was authored by Isaac Rülf in 1883, and in 1884, 34 delegates met in Kattowitz, Germany (today Katowice, Poland). Rabbi Samuel Mohilever was elected the president and Leon Pinsker the chairman of the organization they named Hovevei Zion.

The group tried to secure financial help from Baron Edmond James de Rothschild and other philanthropists to aid Jewish settlements in Palestine and to organize educational courses. In June 1887, another conference was held in Druskininkai.

Read More: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hovevei_Zion

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Zionism

Yes they had their plan of return in full swing clearly before the turn of the last century

Its just that this " fellow white " person Bjerknes tries to claim Hitler declared war on the US on purpose to ensure the defeat of Germany

Yet in doing so , omitted the clear intent of getting America into the war via the Balfour Decleration , which was from one set of Zionists to another , and gave rise to the decision to allow Japan to attack Pearl Harbor , as Germany was at the time.avoiding direct confrontation with US warships even though they were often fired upon in attempts to get the ball rolling .....

Bjerknes doesnt bring any of that into his representation of Hitler as a Zionist mole

He seems intent on using " historical fact " after " historical fact " to make his case and yet all these facts amount to accusations that every high ranking member of the national socialists was either a jew , the.child of a jew , a soviet spy or a communist

It seems his " historical facts " are so conveniently placed as to be almost too perfect

Such as that Stalin was informed of Hitlers intent to enter Russia yet he claims there as no Russian force amassed on the border of Germany , when in fact there was

I dont doubt the Zionists are sneaky bastards and could very well live an entire life of deception , it is after all their MO

But when the man goes on to say such things as : Soviet Russia was not communism I get shades of other Bolshevik Marxists I myself have spent considerable time debating

" that wasnt real communism " is a classic line used by communists

Bjerknes uses it over and over again , denying even that communists were operating in China and that Japan was fighting them , he then concedes there were actually communists in China at the time but says " there werent very many "

Ive come across the same tone in my personal debates .... they lie and then concede that they were wrong but say " yes but its not very many and not enough to worry about "
isaiah 47 : 10

10 You felt secure in your wickedness;
you said, “No one sees me”;
your wisdom and your knowledge led you astray,
and you said in your heart,
“I am, and there is no one besides me.”
Last Edit: 04 Sep 2020 04:17 by MrAnderson.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: novum, Lizzy

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 04 Sep 2020 05:38 #4707

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 18577
  • Likes received: 8730
I remember the good old days, when 90+ year olds in nursing homes lived forever. Darn this pesky virus.

1365 = 1

1.1365 = 1,283,305,580,313,352
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 04 Sep 2020 07:06 #4708

  • Gloria
  • Gloria's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Fresh Member
  • Posts: 430
  • Likes received: 171
novum wrote:
what....do you want to say that Germans weren´t the bad guys...like everyone believes in this world? :nono:

watch: "A woman in Berlin"

:)
"always laugh when you can, it is cheap medicine"
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: novum, Flare

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 19 Sep 2020 01:15 #4709

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 16339
  • Likes received: 6101
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 28 Sep 2020 19:49 #4710

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 16339
  • Likes received: 6101
Churchill's Links With Organized Jewry




Bitchute link
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 03 Oct 2020 19:29 #4711

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 16339
  • Likes received: 6101
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 16 Oct 2020 20:44 #4712

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 16339
  • Likes received: 6101
Roosevelt Conspired To Start World War II in Europe


Posted on October 11, 2020 by WW2Truth



Editor’s Note: Please read John Wear’s articles on WWII if you have not already done so. He has over 60 articles at the website, Inconvenient Truth, and many more at his own website, Wear’s War. He also writes for the Barnes Review. This is just one example of his excellent scholarship.

From Inconvenient History: John Wear was born July 11, 1953 in Houston, Texas. John graduated with a degree in accounting from Southern Methodist University in May 1974 and passed the CPA exam later that year. He graduated from the University of Texas Law School in December 1977 and passed the Texas bar in February 1978. John, who is currently retired, worked most of his career as a CPA. His most recent employment was from 1994 to 2008 with Lacerte Software, a tax division of Intuit Corporation.




John Wear is the author of the book Germany’s War: The Origins, Aftermath and Atrocities of World War II. This book is published by American Free Press and is also sold by The Barnes Review (TBR) and Amazon. John is also on the Board of Contributing Editors of TBR and to date has had 38 articles published by TBR. His work has been highly praised by Willis Carto, Paul Angel, John Tiffany and many other authorities.

John has a website located at wearswar.wordpress.com/ thanks to the generous help of two friends. In addition to publishing John’s articles, this website has a Nuremberg Farce quote of the week section, a monthly Wears War movie review, and a Fake History Lie of the Month section. Readers are encouraged to sign up to receive new posts for free from this website by email. The Wears War website is designed to be both informative and humorous. The goal is to bring history in accord with the facts while being entertaining and enjoyable to read.


Roosevelt the Jewish Puppet



From the article: Establishment historians claim that U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt never wanted war and made every reasonable effort to prevent war. This article will show that contrary to what establishment historians claim, Franklin Roosevelt and his administration wanted war and made every effort to instigate World War II in Europe.


THE SECRET POLISH DOCUMENTS

The Germans seized a mass of documents from the Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs when they invaded Warsaw in late September 1939. The documents were seized when a German SS brigade led by Freiherr von Kuensberg captured the center of Warsaw ahead of the regular German army. Von Kuensberg’s men took control of the Polish Foreign Ministry just as Ministry officials were in the process of burning incriminating documents. These documents clearly establish Roosevelt’s crucial role in planning and instigating World War II. They also reveal the forces behind President Roosevelt that pushed for war.[1]

Some of the secret Polish documents were first published in the United States as The German White Paper. Probably the most-revealing document in the collection is a secret report dated January 12, 1939 by Jerzy Potocki, the Polish ambassador to the United States. This report discusses the domestic situation in the United States. I quote (a translation of) Ambassador Potocki’s report in full:

Jerzy Potocki

There is a feeling now prevalent in the United States marked by growing hatred of Fascism, and above all of Chancellor Hitler and everything connected with National Socialism. Propaganda is mostly in the hands of the Jews who control almost 100% [of the] radio, film, daily and periodical press. Although this propaganda is extremely coarse and presents Germany as black as possible–above all religious persecution and concentration camps are exploited–this propaganda is nevertheless extremely effective since the public here is completely ignorant and knows nothing of the situation in Europe.

At the present moment most Americans regard Chancellor Hitler and National Socialism as the greatest evil and greatest peril threatening the world. The situation here provides an excellent platform for public speakers of all kinds, for emigrants from Germany and Czechoslovakia who with a great many words and with most various calumnies incite the public. They praise American liberty which they contrast with the totalitarian states.

It is interesting to note that in this extremely well-planned campaign which is conducted above all against National Socialism, Soviet Russia is almost completely eliminated. Soviet Russia, if mentioned at all, is mentioned in a friendly manner and things are presented in such a way that it would seem that the Soviet Union were cooperating with the bloc of democratic states. Thanks to the clever propaganda the sympathies of the American public are completely on the side of Red Spain.

This propaganda, this war psychosis is being artificially created. The American people are told that peace in Europe is hanging only by a thread and that war is inevitable. At the same time the American people are unequivocally told that in case of a world war, America also must take an active part in order to defend the slogans of liberty and democracy in the world. President Roosevelt was the first one to express hatred against Fascism. In doing so he was serving a double purpose; first he wanted to divert the attention of the American people from difficult and intricate domestic problems, especially from the problem of the struggle between capital and labor. Second, by creating a war psychosis and by spreading rumors concerning dangers threatening Europe, he wanted to induce the American people to accept an enormous armament program which far exceeds United States defense requirements.

Regarding the first point, it must be said that the internal situation on the labor market is growing worse constantly. The unemployed today already number 12 million. Federal and state expenditures are increasing daily. Only the huge sums, running into billions, which the treasury expends for emergency labor projects, are keeping a certain amount of peace in the country. Thus far only the usual strikes and local unrest have taken place. But how long this government aid can be kept up it is difficult to predict today. The excitement and indignation of public opinion, and the serious conflict between private enterprises and enormous trusts on the one hand, and with labor on the other, have made many enemies for Roosevelt and are causing him many sleepless nights.

As to point two, I can only say that President Roosevelt, as a clever player of politics and a connoisseur of American mentality, speedily steered public attention away from the domestic situation in order to fasten it on foreign policy. The way to achieve this was simple. One needed, on the one hand, to enhance the war menace overhanging the world on account of Chancellor Hitler, and, on the other hand, to create a specter by talking about the attack of the totalitarian states on the United States. The Munich pact came to President Roosevelt as a godsend. He described it as the capitulation of France and England to bellicose German militarism. As was said here: Hitler compelled Chamberlain at pistol-point. Hence, France and England had no choice and had to conclude a shameful peace.

The prevalent hatred against everything which is in any way connected with German National Socialism is further kindled by the brutal attitude against the Jews in Germany and by the émigré problem. In this action Jewish intellectuals participated; for instance, Bernard Baruch; the Governor of New York State, Lehman; the newly appointed judge of the Supreme Court, Felix Frankfurter; Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau, and others who are personal friends of Roosevelt. They want the President to become the champion of human rights, freedom of religion and speech, and the man who in the future will punish trouble-mongers. These groups, people who want to pose as representatives of “Americanism” and “defenders of democracy” in the last analysis, are connected by unbreakable ties with international Jewry.

Or this Jewish international, which above all is concerned with the interests of its race, to put the President of the United States at this “ideal” post of champion of human rights, was a clever move. In this manner they created a dangerous hotbed for hatred and hostility in this hemisphere and divided the world into two hostile camps. The entire issue is worked out in a mysterious manner. Roosevelt has been forcing the foundation for vitalizing American foreign policy, and simultaneously has been procuring enormous stocks for the coming war, for which the Jews are striving consciously. With regard to domestic policy, it is extremely convenient to divert public attention from anti-Semitism which is ever growing in the United States, by talking about the necessity of defending faith and individual liberty against the onslaught of Fascism.[2]



On January 16, 1939, Potocki reported to the Warsaw Foreign Ministry a conversation he had with American Ambassador to France William Bullitt. Bullitt was in Washington on a leave of absence from Paris. Potocki reported that Bullitt stated the main objectives of the Roosevelt administration were:




1. The vitalizing foreign policy, under the leadership of President Roosevelt, severely and unambiguously condemns totalitarian countries.

2. The United States preparation for war on sea, land and air which will be carried out at an accelerated speed and will consume the colossal sum of $1,250 million.

3. It is the decided opinion of the President that France and Britain must put [an] end to any sort of compromise with the totalitarian countries. They must not let themselves in for any discussions aiming at any kind of territorial changes.

4. They have the moral assurance that the United States will leave the policy of isolation and be prepared to intervene actively on the side of Britain and France in case of war. America is ready to place its whole wealth of money and raw materials at their disposal.”[3]



Juliusz (Jules) Łukasiewicz, the Polish ambassador to France, sent a top-secret report from Paris to the Polish Foreign Ministry at the beginning of February 1939. This report outlined the U.S. policy toward Europe as explained to him by William Bullitt:


A week ago, the Ambassador of the United States, W. Bullitt, returned to Paris after having spent three months holiday in America. Meanwhile, I had two conversations with him which enable me to inform Monsieur Minister on his views regarding the European situation and to give a survey of Washington’s policy….

The international situation is regarded by official quarters as extremely serious and being in danger of armed conflict. Competent quarters are of the opinion that if war should break out between Britain and France on the one hand and Germany and Italy on the other, and Britain and France should be defeated, the Germans would become dangerous to the realistic interests of the United States on the American continent. For this reason, one can foresee right from the beginning the participation of the United States in the war on the side of France and Britain, naturally after some time had elapsed after the beginning of the war. Ambassador Bullitt expressed this as follows: “Should war break out we shall certainly not take part in it at the beginning, but we shall end it.”[4]



On March 7, 1939, Ambassador Potocki sent another remarkably perceptive report on Roosevelt’s foreign policy to the Polish government. I quote Potocki’s report in full:


The foreign policy of the United States right now concerns not only the government, but the entire American public as well. The most important elements are the public statements of President Roosevelt. In almost every public speech he refers more or less explicitly to the necessity of activating foreign policy against the chaos of views and ideologies in Europe. These statements are picked up by the press and then cleverly filtered into the minds of average Americans in such a way as to strengthen their already formed opinions. The same theme is constantly repeated, namely, the danger of war in Europe and saving the democracies from inundation by enemy fascism. In all of these public statements there is normally only a single theme, that is, the danger from Nazism and Nazi Germany to world peace.

As a result of these speeches, the public is called upon to support rearmament and the spending of enormous sums for the navy and the air force. The unmistakable idea behind this is that in case of an armed conflict the United States cannot stay out but must take an active part in the maneuvers. As a result of the effective speeches of President Roosevelt, which are supported by the press, the American public is today being conscientiously manipulated to hate everything that smacks of totalitarianism and fascism. But it is interesting that the USSR is not included in all of this. The American public considers Russia more in the camp of the democratic states. This was also the case during the Spanish civil war when the so-called Loyalists were regarded as defenders of the democratic idea.

The State Department operates without attracting a great deal of attention, although it is known that Secretary of State [Cordell] Hull and President Roosevelt swear allegiance to the same ideas. However, Hull shows more reserve than Roosevelt, and he loves to make a distinction between Nazism and Chancellor Hitler on the one hand, and the German people on the other. He considers this form of dictatorial government a temporary “necessary evil.” In contrast, the State Department is unbelievably interested in the USSR and its internal situation and openly worries itself over its weaknesses and decline. The main reason for the United States interest in the Russians is the situation in the Far East. The current government would be glad to see the Red Army emerge as the victor in a conflict with Japan. That’s why the sympathies of the government are clearly on the side of China, which recently received considerable financial aid amounting to 25 million dollars.

Eager attention is given to all information from the diplomatic posts as well as to the special emissaries of the President who serve as ambassadors of the United States. The President frequently calls his representatives from abroad to Washington for personal exchanges of views and to give them special information and instructions. The arrival of the envoys and ambassadors is always shrouded in secrecy and very little surfaces in the press about the results of their visits. The State Department also takes care to avoid giving out any kind of information about the course of these interviews. The practical way in which the President makes foreign policy is most effective. He gives personal instructions to his representatives abroad, most of whom are his personal friends. In this way the United States is led down a dangerous path in world politics with the explicit intention of abandoning the comfortable policy of isolation. The President regards the foreign policy of his country as a means of satisfying his own personal ambition. He listens carefully and happily to his echo in the other capitals of the world. In domestic as well as foreign policy, the Congress of the United States is the only object that stands in the way of the President and his government in carrying out his decisions quickly and ambitiously. One hundred and fifty years ago, the Constitution of the United States gave the highest prerogatives to the American parliament which may criticize or reject the law of the White House.

The foreign policy of President Roosevelt has recently been the subject of intense discussion in the lower house and in the Senate, and this has caused excitement. The so-called Isolationists, of whom there are many in both houses, have come out strongly against the President. The representatives and the senators were especially upset over the remarks of the President, which were published in the press, in which he said that the borders of the United States lie on the Rhine. But President Roosevelt is a superb political player and understands completely the power of the American parliament. He has his own people there, and he knows how to withdraw from an uncomfortable situation at the right moment.

Very intelligently and cleverly he ties together the question of foreign policy with the issues of American rearmament. He particularly stresses the necessity of spending enormous sums in order to maintain a defensive peace. He says specifically that the United States is not arming in order to intervene or to go to the aid of England or France in case of war, but because of the need to show strength and military preparedness in case of an armed conflict in Europe. In his view this conflict is becoming ever more acute and is completely unavoidable.

Since the issue is presented this way, the houses of Congress have no cause to object. To the contrary, the houses accepted an armament program of more than 1 billion dollars. (The normal budget is 550 million, the emergency 552 million dollars). However, under the cloak of a rearmament policy, President Roosevelt continues to push forward his foreign policy, which unofficially shows the world that in case of war the United States will come out on the side of the democratic states with all military and financial power.

In conclusion it can be said that the technical and moral preparation of the American people for participation in a war–if one should break out in Europe–is proceeding rapidly. It appears that the United States will come to the aid of France and Great Britain with all its resources right from the beginning. However, I know the American public and the representatives and senators who all have the final word, and I am of the opinion that the possibility that America will enter the war as in 1917 is not great. That’s because the majority of the states in the mid-West and West, where the rural element predominates, want to avoid involvement in European disputes at all costs. They remember the declaration of the Versailles Treaty and the well-known phrase that the war was to save the world for democracy. Neither the Versailles Treaty nor that slogan have reconciled the United States to that war. For millions there remains only a bitter aftertaste because of unpaid billions which the European states still owe America.[5]
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 16 Oct 2020 20:46 #4713

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 16339
  • Likes received: 6101
Continued.....



These secret Polish reports were written by top-level Polish ambassadors who were not necessarily friendly to Germany. However, they understood the realities of European politics far better than people who made foreign policy in the United States. The Polish ambassadors realized that behind all of their rhetoric about democracy and human rights, the Jewish leaders in the United States who agitated for war against Germany were deceptively advancing their own interests.

There is no question that the secret documents taken from the Polish Foreign Ministry in Warsaw are authentic. Charles C. Tansill considered the documents genuine and stated, “Some months ago I had a long conversation with M. Lipsky, the Polish ambassador in Berlin in the prewar years, and he assured me that the documents in the German White Paper are authentic.”[6]

William H. Chamberlain wrote, “I have been privately informed by an extremely reliable source that Potocki, now residing in South America, confirmed the accuracy of the documents, so far as he was concerned.”[7] Historian Harry Elmer Barnes also stated, “Both Professor Tansill and myself have independently established the thorough authenticity of these documents.”[8]

Edward Raczyński


Edward Raczyński, the Polish ambassador to London from 1934 to 1945, confirmed in his diary the authenticity of the Polish documents. He wrote in his entry on June 20, 1940: “The Germans published in April a White Book containing documents from the archives of our Ministry of Foreign Affairs, consisting of reports from Potocki from Washington, Łukasiewicz in Paris and myself. I do not know where they found them, since we were told that the archives had been destroyed. The documents are certainly genuine, and the facsimiles show that for the most part the Germans got hold of the originals and not merely copies.”[9]

The official papers and memoirs of Juliusz Łukasiewicz published in 1970 in the book Diplomat in Paris 1936-1939 reconfirmed the authenticity of the Polish documents. Łukasiewicz was the Polish ambassador to Paris, who authored several of the secret Polish documents. The collection was edited by Wacław Jędrzejewicz, a former Polish diplomat and cabinet member. Jędrzejewicz considered the documents made public by the Germans absolutely genuine, and quoted from several of them.

Tyler G. Kent, who worked at the U.S. Embassy in London in 1939 and 1940, has also confirmed the authenticity of the secret Polish documents. Kent says that he saw copies of U.S. diplomatic messages in the files which corresponded to the Polish documents. [10]

The German Foreign Office published the Polish documents on March 29, 1940. The Reich Ministry of Propaganda released the documents to strengthen the case of the American isolationists and to prove the degree of America’s responsibility for the outbreak of war. In Berlin, journalists from around the world were permitted to examine the original documents themselves, along with a large number of other documents from the Polish Foreign Ministry. The release of the documents caused an international media sensation. American newspapers published lengthy excerpts from the documents and gave the story large front-page headline coverage.[11]

However, the impact of the released documents was far less than the German government had hoped for. Leading U.S. government officials emphatically denounced the documents as not being authentic. William Bullitt, who was especially incriminated by the documents, stated, “I have never made to anyone the statements attributed to me.” Secretary of State Cordell Hull denounced the documents: “I may say most emphatically that neither I nor any of my associates in the Department of State have ever heard of any such conversations as those alleged, nor do we give them the slightest credence. The statements alleged have not represented in any way at any time the thought or the policy of the American government.”[12] American newspapers stressed these high-level denials in reporting the release of the Polish documents.





These categorical denials by high-level U.S. government officials almost completely eliminated the effect of the secret Polish documents. The vast majority of the American people in 1940 trusted their elected political leaders to tell the truth. If the Polish documents were in fact authentic and genuine, this would mean that President Roosevelt and his representatives had lied to the American public, while the German government told the truth. In 1940, this was far more than the trusting American public could accept.

To continue read, click here….



ww2truth.com/2020/10/11/roosevelt-conspired-to-start-world-war-ii-in-europe/
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 23 Oct 2020 18:35 #4714

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 16339
  • Likes received: 6101
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 25 Oct 2020 01:40 #4715

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 16339
  • Likes received: 6101
Truth Will Out Radio: Alfred Rosenberg




Sven Longshanks and Dennis Wise discuss the misuse of Alfred Rosenberg to slander the Third Reich as being against Christianity.

This podcast replays parts from two earlier podcasts, the first part debunking a video called ‘God and Hitler’.

This video cites fake quotes about Hitler, while ignoring his actions in defending Christianity and enacting laws first created by the Catholic Church.

Genuine quotes from Hitler are used from ‘The Holy Reich’ as well as his negative remarks about Rosenberg’s ‘heretical’ book.

The alleged 30 point plan for a National Reich church is debunked and shown to be nothing to do with the actual Reich Church.


Presented by Sven Longshanks and Dennis Wise


:right: archive.radioalbion.com/TWOR/TWOR%20102320.mp3

www.radioalbion.com/2020/10/truth-will-out-radio-alfred-rosenberg.html
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 26 Oct 2020 10:11 #4716

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 16339
  • Likes received: 6101
Last Edit: 26 Oct 2020 10:19 by Flare.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: MrAnderson

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 05 Nov 2020 21:47 #4717

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 16339
  • Likes received: 6101
On the Accusation that Hitler Snubbed Jesse Owens

Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 20 Nov 2020 17:49 #4718

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 16339
  • Likes received: 6101
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie? 21 Nov 2020 13:05 #4719

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 16339
  • Likes received: 6101
Truth Will Out Radio: Interviewing National Socialists





Sven Longshanks talks to an interviewer who spoke with Gudrun Himmler and others associated with National Socialism.

Ahnenerbe was introduced to Gudrun and various others in her circle of friends through a family relation.

He gathered together over two hundred of these interviews and talks about his impressions of some of the people he met, including Edda Göring, Irene Rosenberg and Leni Reifenstahl.


Presented by Sven Longshanks with Ahnenerbe



:right: archive.radioalbion.com/TWOR/TWOR%20112020.mp3


www.radioalbion.com/2020/11/truth-will-out-radio-interviewing.html
Last Edit: 21 Nov 2020 13:06 by Flare.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
Moderators: novum, rodin, Flare
Powered by Kunena Forum

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it. Secure transactions via paypal.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2020 - May 2021, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 255 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 70 - Raised
( £ 53 GBP )
donation thermometer
21%
Most Recent Donation $50 USD
28th August 2020

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.