TOPIC: This Is National Socialism

I haven't watched this propaganda film yet, only skimmed it and read the video description:




And also a few of the comments:









Maybe I'll watch it, maybe not ... because I was fed livelong with this kind of propaganda
from kindergarten on and thus every second I spend on it is most probably wasted, especially
because someone like Cinta posted it and Gaia thanked her, which says it all already.


.

GMP wrote:
They would have beaten Stalin without any problems, if it wasn't for the US to financially support the Soviets, sending them military equipment, freezing German assets and the UK stabbing them in the back after their big defeat at Dunkirk. The US was also supporting the UK back then, financially + lots of military equipment.

Basically it took the power of the 3 superpowers in the world combined in order to defeat Germany, so they were definately supreme and could have taken on 2 of them. 3 was just too much.

Anyway, I see you're quite happy with the whole world going to hell under your preferred communism regime at the moment.

Ich klage an in English : I Accuse

German pro-euthanasia propaganda film made in 1941 and directed by Wolfgang Liebeneiner


Wolfgang Liebeneiner’s Ich klage an (I Accuse) is a lyrical treatment of a controversial topic—mercy killing—featuring
sensitive performances by Paul Hartmann as the physician who administers a fatal overdose to his incurably ill wife;
Heidemarie Hatheyer as the wife who begs him to release her from her suffering; and Mathias Wieman as the doctor
who refuses her request. Gentle, loving, moving, the picture promotes assisted suicide, a quagmire as conflicted
in the twenty-first century as it was in 1941.

The genesis of the film came from a recommendation by Professor Karl Brandt, a member of the Führer’s entourage,
that a picture be produced to persuade the public to accept the policy of euthanasia.

The film’s virtually subliminal message is that the state must assume responsibility for the involuntary liquidation
of the mentally handicapped.

For decades thereafter, German physicians remembered its impact and the debates it stimulated about the morality
of medical killing. Reports made by the Sicherheitsdienst (the SS Security Service or SD) following the picture’s
release on 29 August 1941 indicate that the film was favorably received, the majority of Germans, as well as most
physicians, accepting its argument.

Starting in 1939, victims were registered at Hereditary Health Courts, examined, and then transported to specially
selected clinics where their lives were terminated. Does Ich klage an possess demonic qualities? It does not. It is a
respectable, artistic triumph that was used to promote a program that went far beyond anything proposed in the
picture. Its director later called it “a document of humanity in an inhuman time.”
ihffilm.com/22985.html

Here is the entire movie for those who can understand German.



If you are unable to understand German then I refer to Youtube link below which has scenes referring euthanasia ;


start at 40.38



Euthanasia is also National Socialism ; no one has answered these questions yet; Says enough doesn't it

Flare wrote:
Half-truth propagandiser and no-truth seeker Flare conveniently "forgets" a "superpower" funded by the US...

1 - How Bush's grandfather helped Hitler's rise to power
2 - American Banks Funded the Nazis
3 - Who Financed Adolf Hitler?
Now, why would an "honest", "open-minded" "researcher" like Flare hide this from the audience?

Flare wrote:
so ... flare is saying, "the germans could have won the war, if there were not so many people fighting against them."
brilliant ... fucking brilliant.
in another thread, flare was trying to tell us that a jew is ineligible to be POTUS.
the man is, very clearly, a raving idiot.

Cinta wrote:


Thank you very much, Cinta, very interesting, for I haven't known or watched this before!







Translation by machine




TRANSLATION of the website


.

Gaia, you're just posting old rubbish and ''half truths'' that's been regurgitated ad nauseam on the webs for ages now.

Here read this very well sourced piece below, which blows what you posted right out of the water, and straightens out those over repeated and worn out lies and myths about the Bushes et al funding the National socialists.

Demystification of the Birth and Funding of the NSDAP


V.K. Clarke

What exactly did the NSDAP (National Socialist German Worker's Party) represent and who were its founding members? Why and how did Adolf Hitler transform the party from an unimpressive proletariat workers’ party to a full-fledged political machine that obtained absolute power in Germany? Perhaps more important, how was it funded? We answer these questions in this introduction. But first, we begin with an examination of the early stages of the NSDAP and its recruiting process. One must understand how this process unfolded if one is to understand the NSDAP’s position on Judaism and Freemasonry as well as the prevailing social and political order of the day. Naturally, we also reveal some of the other important aspects of its early development, which necessitates a fair amount of myth busting about Hitler, including who actually gave him money.

Triumvirate: Leadership, development and unity

Adolf Hitler, contrary to his own self-myths and the myths of others, was not poor—at least not until he had drained his savings and entitlements gallivanting in Vienna. Many historians have written that Hitler simply lived day-to-day wasting both his money and time, but in so doing they overlook Hitler’s experiences and ‘life education’ that later played such an important role in the development and direction of National Socialism as well as the Second World War. The development and direction of both can be traced to Hitler’s experiences during those “lost” years.

Hitler, like so many other young German men and women of his day, fell from middle-class status into that of the “wretched proletariat.” This was something that young Hitler refused to accept. He was deeply embittered by his Vienna experiences, which offered false promises of prosperity and hope for young people with enough willpower and talent. The prevailing dissonance of the time and place in which he grew up inculcated in him a burning desire to change these circumstances, which is precisely what he did after 1933. Hitler was so resentful of the class-ridden society that was Vienna, and Austria and Europe generally, that one of his key aims throughout both the peace and war years was cultivating a system of merit. One’s birth station was not what mattered. What mattered were one’s talent, loyalty, dependability and fortitude, notably in the face of adversity and uncertainty. Hitler was able to overcome most imbedded class barriers in two distinct ways:

1. He recruited both men and women from all social classes and accordingly tailored his speech and disposition to each, depending on his/her social standing.

2. He supplanted economic valuation with racial valuation.

Let’s look at the first point. Hitler needed the broadest spectrum of German society he could get, so this meant that he needed to appeal to men, women, young, old, wealthy, poor, unemployed and employed alike. Women were amongst Hitler’s most devoted and fervent supporters in the early years. So were low-wage earners, small businessmen and foreign nobles, such as White Russian émigrés who wished to see the return of the Russian monarchy. They provided Hitler with a physical audience, elite and business connections and monetary support, most of which ended up being granted in the form of loans. Hitler needed industrialists as much as he needed the workers, elites and disenfranchised foreigners. Since his goal was to raise the station of all lower-class ethnic Germans, he had to win them all together, which required a strategy of multi-class appeal. When he met and spoke with counts, duchesses and other members of the former royalty, he addressed them in a royal manner. His etiquette, speech and personal manners proved impeccable in such company. When he met or spoke with industrialists, such as Fritz Thyssen, he tailored his behavior and manner to match that of the hopes and fears of industrialist Germany. At the same time he was careful to scale back his socialistic language in such company, so that the industrialists would not misidentify him as a Marxist-Communist. He had to convince them that he would crush Marxist-Communism and uphold their industrial power base in the face of the growing mass of disenchanted, underpaid workers who felt they were being cheated and exploited by German industry. Whenever things got economically tough, the workers suffered wage and benefit cuts. They blamed the industrialists, but Hitler saw that the industrialists were also suffering: many went bankrupt during the inflation as well as during the Great Depression. The crippling Versailles reparations forced most German industrialists and exporters into an untenable economic position, which in turn harmed German workers. This meant that Hitler had to at least hint at future German rearmament, which was covertly occurring anyway. On the other hand, Hitler had to promise the workers, his single largest and most important support base in almost every respect in the formative years, that he would not allow the state or industry to exploit them or continue treating them as automatons. We can see that balancing the wants and needs of these three core sectors of class-ridden Germany was far from simple. But Hitler did it, and nearly bloodlessly (relative to the Communist revolutions in Russia and throughout Eastern Europe).

Now to the second point: Hitler had to come up with a unifying ideology for Germanic peoples. This task seems simple in retrospect, because Germany was a homogenous society by today’s standards. However, back then this was not how the German situation was seen. Germany may have been racially homogenous, but class antagonisms were so deep-seated that few if any German elites and nobles were interested in sharing political or social power with lower-class and middle-class Germans. The Junkers (estates Lords) treated their farmhands (serfs) as second- or third-class citizens and ordered them to pack up and get out if they dared to vote against their landlord employers. According to James and Suzanne Pool's research, many of the Junkers, notably the friends of von Hindenburg, refused to discontinue living the feudal order, which helped fuel the growing mass discontent for monarchy. This only served the interests of republicans and Freemasons, both of whom wished to see the end of monarchy for good. We will discuss their motivations later. For now it is enough to say that their motives were far from benevolent. German class divisions trumped any sort of racial or ethnic solidarity. Not surprisingly, one finds that the desire to unite all Germans as racial comrades was a desire shared almost entirely amongst the lower and middle classes, and even many middle-class Germans did everything they could to cling to their bourgeois life station, even if it meant keeping the lower-classes downtrodden. As one can see, Hitler’s goal was anything but simple.

How, then, did Hitler unite Germans? And how successful was he? Hitler united Germans by invoking an ideological concept similar to Italy’s Romanita, as espoused by Benito Mussolini. Hitler’s concept was Nordicism: the basic, simplified premise of which was that all Germanic peoples were united by their Nordic racial component, and because they were united by this common “race soul” or blood component, how could they fight or be divided? While such a unifying idea sounded feasible and reasonable to many, some resisted nonetheless. The Junkers, former nobility, and many other business elites in Germany saw Hitler as nothing other than a lowly former corporal who had no clout given his petit bourgeois (lower middle-class) upbringing. Hitler was only partially successful in uniting all Germans as Volksgenossen. His lack of complete success in this regard, an unattainable goal to be sure, later proved to be his undoing. Elites amongst the officer corps did immeasurable damage to Hitler and his war effort, but the story of their treachery and sabotage is beyond the scope of this discussion. Read more Here

bd wrote:
I dunno bd. IMHO Flare is pretty much right in what he says.
Had the Axis forces not lost then they might have won.
Fact is.
They lost.

bd wrote:
First off, Germany did not want war, but was provoked into one with Poland as German civilians were getting slaughtered in the Danzig corridor.
(which was former territory of Germany before WW I)

Second, you could ask yourself why the UK was teaming up with France to attack Germany, while Stalin got a free pass for invading Poland.
THIS is just the dead giveaway that there was foul play at hand and that the world elite were pulling the strings in order to combine the world's forces in order to destroy Germany.

Third, in the end it took the force of 3 superpowers COMBINED to defeat Germany. Clearly it was foul play, since Hitler tried everything in order to avoid war. He didn't want to invade West-Europe; Churchill was the agressor. Basically what they have done is just as dirty as entering a boxing match with 3 vs 1, with the 3 boxers on one team fighting without gloves and not by the rules, while the 1 boxer played fair and almost beat them after all.

Interjection:

I was searching for this quite good article on "If Hitler / Germany won the war" on TZ
but can't find it.

Can someone please help?

Thanks, already.

.

flare is clearly an idiot.
... clearer with every post he makes.
ganging up on an enemy during war is not fair??
must be lonely in your skull, with so few brain cells.

PFIZIPFEI wrote:
Hmm... I also can't find it.

bd wrote:

Seriously, I think we all should meditate over the contents of this post
and certainly about the creator.


Thank you very much, Bikerdruid von Difpit, for this valuable contribution!

bd wrote:
So this is all you got as a response.. name-calling and telling 'its fair' to gang up on Germany while they did not want war?

Well mr. LGBT, if I were you you'd better start worrying for when the muslims become a majority, as your kind will be the first they will start dropping off buildings.

BD - not sure that Flare meant
Was going to post what I think he meant, but decided it is best for Flare to clarify.

Flare wrote:



You appear to hold them in high esteem or rather their ways of ... getting rid of / "euthanising"
self-declared FPs?


Ref. on TZ: What are your thoughts on euthanasia?


.

Voltaire wrote:
It is not fair in the sense that Germany did not want war, but it was waged upon them.

Besides that, it also wasn't fair to declare war on Germany for invading Poland (which clearly was provocated) while giving Stalin a free pass.
There is no other explanation for giving a free pass to Stalin than the world elite combining capitalism with communism, which on the outset looked very much opposed to eachother, but in fact were invented/created by the same people who rule the world.

This means that the world elite wanted to punish Germany for freeing itself from the international banking system which is enslaving and eventually will destroy us all in the long-run.

That is essentially what I thought you meant. Thanks. The foul play was that international forces (who must not be named) wanted to destroy NSDAP Germany, and used devious stratagems to force armed conflict.

Can't have Russians' examining NS.
freespeechtwentyfirstcentury.com/2016/04/28/national-socialism-rising-in-russia-government-banned-ns-symbols/

National Socialism Rising in Russia, Government Banned NS Symbols

Before the end of the year, the State Duma is to receive the draft law on the inadmissibility of rehabilitation and glorification of National Socialism.

The document is being developed by members of the Federation Council, said RBC. The law will ban the use of NS symbols, signs, and forms of greeting. The penalty for wearing NS symbols will be toughened significantly: the fine will start from 300,000 rubles ($10,000). Violators of the law may also face a prison term of up to 2 years. Appropriate changes are proposed to Article 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation about “extremism”.

Presently, the production and sales of NS attributes entails an administrative fine of up to 100,000 rubles. A public demonstration of such symbols is punished with the fine of up to 1,000 rubles, or up to 15 days of administrative arrest. Thus, the rule of law will be severely tightened.

The bill will give definitions of key terms. In particular, the document will specify the meaning of such notions as “Nazism”, “Nazi criminals”, “rehabilitation of Nazism,” “glorification of Nazi criminals” and “Nazi symbols.”

In addition, the senators propose to establish a special committee that would struggle against the rehabilitation of National Socialism, monitor the situation and prepare annual reports on the state of affairs in this field, the Izvestia newspaper wrote.

In Defense of Hitler and his National-Socialism

nseuropa.wordpress.com/2013/10/06/in-defense-of-hitler-and-his-national-socialism/

From „Letters to Editor,“ National Vanguard No. 103, Jan.-Feb. 1985

Source: williamlutherpierce.blogspot.com/2011/06/in-defense-of-national-socialism.html

William Pierce

The Second World War was the great watershed in the collapse of the West. Had any major Western nation — in particular, Britain, France, or America — had the integrity to resist the Jews and avoid being drawn into their worldwide conspiracy against Germany, there would have been no world war, but only a war between National Socialist Germany and the Marxist Soviet Union. Germany would have won, Marxism would have been eradicated, and it would have been the beginning of the end for the Jews everywhere.

Instead, Western men were persuaded by their bought politicians, their Judeo-Christian priests, and the Jewish manipulators of public opinion in their midst to take up arms against their German brothers in an unholy crusade to eradicate National Socialism, so that the Jews and the Marxist cancer they had unleashed on the world could survive. Before the Second World War the West was still viable; afterward it was not.

The catastrophe of 1945, with the triumph of the Jew and his allies, made inevitable the opening up of the immigration floodgates for non-Whites into Britain and the United States; the destruction of American White public schools; the enactment of laws curtailing White freedom of association and the rights of White employers and renters (and with them the rights of White employees and tenants); the rise of feminism, homosexuality, and drug use; the breakdown of the traditional family structure; a soaring miscegenation rate; and the displacement of healthy White art, music, literature and drama by a Judeo-democratic-Hollywood ’schlock’ culture. It also led to the metastasis of the Marxist cancer throughout huge areas of Europe and the rise of malignant Zionist power in Palestine — a power which surely would be the instigator of the Third World War.

It behooves those of us who still hope that enough healthy genes for a new beginning can be salvaged from the coming chaos, therefore, to understand everything we can about the Second World War; about its preeminent personality, Adolf Hitler; and about his ideology, National Socialism, from the eradication of which logically followed the evils briefly accounted above. That’s why NATIONAL VANGUARD often has articles on these subjects and will do so in the future.

As for the „socialism” in National Socialism, don’t let yourself be deceived by its enemies, among whom are the adherents of the Judeo-capitalists New Right; it certainly has nothing to do with the Semitic socialism Marx and his kinsmen peddled. The first slogan of Hitler’s National Socialists was: „The common interest before self-interest!” They believed that every German, whether a factory owner or a janitor, should put the interests of his nation and his race ahead of his personal interests. That was really what they meant by the „socialism” in National Socialism.

They also believed that it was the responsibility of the nation’s leaders to concern themselves with the physical health of every member of the nation — not to cater to special-interest groups or to win popularity contests with the fickle and easily swayed masses.

These beliefs determined the racial, economic, and educational policies of Hitler’s government. That government was „socialist,” in that it devoted much of its efforts to improving the economic welfare of working-class and middle-class Germans, as well as the racial quality and racial consciousness of the whole nation. But it did not attempt to enforce any sort of artificial „equality” on its citizens, either of status or income. And it did not discourage the entrepreneurial activities of individual Germans, so long as those activities were not harmful to national interests. Private property not only remained sacrosanct in National Socialist Germany, but the government instituted new policies to enable small farmers to avoid losing their land to moneylenders.

Whether that is „socialism,” or not, NATIONAL VANGUARD certainly is not against it. To go further: We will not break the Zionist hold on America until White Americans have made a conscious decision to put their common racial interests ahead of their private interests.

---