TOPIC: I Am Sick Of Hearing The Word Tolerance

That's all I hear lately in the media in the aftermath of violent migrants running amok in Europe. Meanwhile 10's of thousands keep coming through our borders on a weekly basis, and onto European soil. And all we hear is how we need to be more tolerant, and that ''diversity is our strength''. It's all become one sick joke. Fuck tolerance, what we need is to regain our healthy intolerance back to this kind nonsense.

How very in - tolerant of you!

Intolerance can be very healthy, especially when it means keeping predatory migrants and their backward cultures and desert religions away from a people they're incompatible with.

Agreed .. The desert religions are all totally incompatible with civilized society.

Tolerance

1. a fair, objective, and permissive attitude toward those whose opinions, beliefs, practices, racial or ethnic origins, etc., differ from one's own; freedom from bigotry.
2. a fair, objective, and permissive attitude toward opinions, beliefs, and practices that differ from one's own.
3. interest in and concern for ideas, opinions, practices, etc., foreign to one's own; a liberal, undogmatic viewpoint.

Other uses in the link

====

1. a fair, objective, and permissive attitude toward those whose opinions, beliefs, practices, racial or ethnic origins, etc., differ from one's own; freedom from bigotry.

This definition is about people ("those whose")
-> what is fair? Who defines "fair"?
-> what is objective? How can anyone be objective if we're all individual subjects? If not, who defines "objective"?
-> permissive, what are the cut-off values for "permissive"?
-> opinions, beliefs, practices, racial/ethnic origins, why are variables; actions (practices), opinions/beliefs and invariables (racial/ethnic origins) mixed here?
-> what does "etc." mean?
-> why does it have to link to "one's own"? What about a different standard? E.g. a non-smoker tolerates other people smoking around him/her? But also; a non-user of crack cocaine doesn't tolerate other people doing crack cocaine around him/her?

2. a fair, objective, and permissive attitude toward opinions, beliefs, and practices that differ from one's own.

This definition is about things (without "those whose", so not about the subject -person- but the object -opinions, beliefs, practices-)
-> what is fair? Who defines "fair"?
-> what is objective? How can anyone be objective if we're all individual subjects? If not, who defines "objective"?
-> permissive, what are the cut-off values for "permissive"?
-> opinions, beliefs, practices, racial/ethnic origins, why are actions (practices) and opinions/beliefs mixed here?
-> what does "etc." mean?
-> why does it have to link to "one's own"? What about a different standard?

3. interest in and concern for ideas, opinions, practices, etc., foreign to one's own; a liberal, undogmatic viewpoint.

This definition doesn't make any sense
-> "tolerance for" has nothing to do with "interest in"
-> "concern for" requires an action/active policy, tolerance doesn't require actions or anything active, it is passive
-> now "ideas" are mixed into it, which are just like opinions and beliefs personally expressed thoughts
-> why does it have to link to "one's own", now "foreign"? What about different standards?

====

Who writes these crappy "definitions"?

There's nothing wrong with being tolerant if it promotes peace and understanding. A little tolerance goes a long way sometimes. But this type of tolerance which is being drummed and instilled into people is something quite different. It's total apathy. They've conditioned people to tolerate their own destruction.

'Compromise' is a better word for whats going on. They want you to compromise with what you know is right and wrong. Notice how it's always you doing the compromising, NEVER the invaders? If you compromise this week, next week there'll be a new list of things for you to compromise. The key is to not compromise ANYTHING, but unfortunately that ship has sailed.

bd wrote:
Says the Queen of Tolerance

Let's be tolerant of white Christians who reject multiculturalism, race mixing and homosexuality

Zorro wrote:
I'm sick to death of the word diversity

Orangeaid wrote:
NOT-A-FUCKING-CHANCE

I have no tolerance for intolerant twats, orange or otherwise..


For the record, I have no problem with white Christians.
I know many who are counted as neighbours and friends.
They accept me as I am .. weird as I am.
I dislike intolerant twats. They come in all colours and creeds.

No 'man spreading' permitted in Madrid. Men should set on the bus with their legs closed so as to not offend the feminist.




www.rt.com/news/391442-madrid-manspreading-public-transport/

Sometimes you just can't make this shit up.

^^^^ That's pretty darn funny, ya gotta admit.
"He's from Barcelona," said Basil Faulty, condescendingly.

peacenik wrote:
Don't give up, don't give in, to the social engineers.

It's that simple.

Just stick to your own (or other, if you like) standards for what you tolerate our not.

In the end, all those Elitist social engineers don't tolerate anything outside of the psychopathic child-raping lying scumbag power-hungry environment they are comfortable in themselves...

Tolerance & Apathy




truth-zone.net/forum/pfizipfei-forum-general-discussion/66213-resistance.html?start=40#250594

bd wrote:

So you only tolerate subversive communist satanist shit eating homos like yourself then !

How tolerant of you

Commies are the most intolerant people of all

peacenik wrote:
I hope Spanish men Respond by sitting on public transport manspreading as far as possible in shorts going commando

Orangeaid wrote:
"Shit eating homos?"
Man, you have issues.
How long have you been into scat?

I wonder if this tolerance centre educates Russians about their mass murder by communist Jews?

www.jewish-museum.ru/en/tolerance-center/

The more the orange thing posts, the more we recognize his total intolerance of anyone who is not as bigoted as himself.

Put a sock in it,idiot.