TOPIC: Fighting Racism - Implementing Multiculturalism

Seaic wrote:




Given that the roots of your culture are not exactly identical, but very closely related to those of mine,
the process of mixing our cultures by exchanging knowledge, but also genes, taking the words literally,
might most probably lead to the benefit of all involved
and thus generate a fruitful evolutionary step in the history of mankind.



This is what 'multi-cultural' is meant to be in reality!

They turned EVERYTHING upside down!!!

Rape and other abominations, eg blood rituals, never were part of either of our cultures:
truth-zone.net/forum/general-discussion/61895-fighting-racism-implementing-multiculturalism.html?start=60#125547
truth-zone.net/forum/general-discussion/61895-fighting-racism-implementing-multiculturalism.html#67137

Seaic wrote:

Ray Honeyford: Racist or right?

sparked by

The fear of being seen as racist
By Dominic Howell
BBC News

www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-28967427

How much more persuasive the "top down" protection of the Jews....

Cinta wrote:
I agree, but you need to understand that there is a difference between pride and hatred. There is also a very important difference between white/black nationalism and white/black supremacism. I'll let you figure it out.

Seaic wrote:
I understand.
I cannot deny Dutch history but still I am proud to be Dutch.

Cinta wrote:
Good for you.

And by the way, I don't really dislike the Dutch, that was just a joke.

PFIZIPFEI wrote:
Consider that the authorities werent necessarily concerned about being labelled/accused, but rather, were concerned that the public would resent pakistani immigrants and immigration.

novum wrote:

What's the difference, Novum?

What makes the difference for the VICTIMS, Novum?


Excerpt of a comment:

"If I throw over 1400 infants in the lion's den, where they are killed, then who is the problem?

The lion or me?"

PFIZIPFEI wrote:
Nothing, PFIZIPFEI.

None, PFIZIPFEI.

The point was that this being exposed would possibly be detrimental to their plans in other areas, PFIZIPFEI.

novum wrote:


Excuse me, but detrimental to which plans in which areas, Novum?

It's really hard to understand what you are trying to get at, let alone the language issues.


.

PFIZIPFEI wrote:
Read your OP.

I will explain again... you said the authorites turned a blind eye because they didnt want to be accused of being racist. I said, that (and imho) the authorities dont really give a shit about that. What they do care about is...they dont want the natives turning on the immigrants because they want the immigrants to be accepted.

kapish?

novum wrote:
I think you are right. They will do anything to protect their multicultural experiment. Perhaps more than any government in the world, the British government is completely devoted to this social engineering. But it won't work, people are angry.

I prefer conscious and responsible self-censorship.

PFIZIPFEI wrote:
Most proponents of immigration are middle-class and live in leafy suburbs which are predominantly white British. They don't have to deal with the consequences that the working-class English peasants do.

novum wrote:
yes I agree novum - but now the have achieved mass immigration and to a large extent given the criminal element the idea that they can run sex rings with white girls un hindered and have been taught to cry 'racism' at every turn , embued a sense of 'getting away it' and disrespect for their 'host' countries.....this and that some will become more radical , returning from abroad with blood on their hands - it only takes a few to make all the immigrants look like the enemy - esp, when they start demanding separate Sharia law - I see them being set- up and accused for all the ecomonic woes ect - riots will ensue - this takes the heat off the jewish zionists' who fermented all this.......Many second and third generation + aren;t the criminal element to 'fear' and resent the recent huge influx , those w/o any 'education' and easily radicalized ......most of the N. EU is fill to brim with now - and I think the 'whites' are waking up to their demise but won;t figure out who the real perps were / are - the French might be a bit more aware as a people than most other countries to who the zionist jews are.
It's the slow kill for 'whitey' with the divide and conquer riots , to throw most of the scent. - but the jews' are getting rummbled too but once these globalists' get the last laws in - the Trans Pacific / Trans Atlantic Partnership Agreements and all standards go to hell, spiralling into austerity - they have a plan for everywhere - and the courts / cops , hundreds of groups / foundations all working together - this is going to be a v rough time .
Humanity v Insanity.

novum wrote:

First, I did only quoted an article and a comment to this article, which - as usual - does not necessarily comply 100% with my own attitude.
Second, I did not get your evasive response and thus asked for more extensive explanation.
Third, I thank you for your explanation.

.

As I see it, just as with Waterloo which is how the Jews cemented the theft of England, but on a much slower time scale, the armies are being moved onto the future battlefields..... and this time the stakes are higher....

Happening in ALL white nations, meanwhile agents provocateur and assassins working for the eventual victors (hint not the christians/whites or muslims/mestizos) are already in place, ready to react to information gathered by the full specturm Jew spy apparatus called the internet

truth-zone.net/forum/general-discussion/64230-ok-i-know-this-is-very-controversial-for-now.html

I think this is not just a problem in the UK,but also in many other countries
in the world.
If your country looks like it doesn't belong to you anymore ; we will be faced with
problems.

''The future of islamic finance in the global economy looks bright.With 10 of
the world's fastest growing markets in Muslim-majority countries,industry
forecasts estimate that islamic investements might grow to £1.3 trillion by 2014.
TheUK–and London in particular –has already become acentre for Islamic finance.
Morethan a dozen banks deliver Islamic finance transactions.There is hardly a large
professional services firm that does not have specialis tIslamic financeteams.
And Islamic finance has helped transform London’s skyline byfinancing in whole
or inpart developments suchasTheShard,Chelsea Barracks,Harrods and
the Olympic Village.''
Rt. Hon. David Cameron MP
www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/253141/UKTI_UK_Excellence_in_Islamic_Finance.pdf

''The moment that the white British become a minority will symbolize a
huge transfer of power -- cultural political, economic and religious --
an "irreversible change in British society, unprecedented for at least a millennium."
— David Coleman, Professor of Demography, University of Oxford''
www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3735/britain-islamic-future#

''British Muslims contribute more than £31 billion to the UK economy and wield
a spending power of £20.5 billion, a new report has found.''
www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/10/29/uk-muslims-economy_n_4170781.html

“When Islamic finance is growing 50pc faster than traditional banking and when
global Islamic investments are set to grow to £1.3 trillion by 2014, we want to
make sure a big proportion of that new investment is made here in Britain,
” Mr Cameron will tell an audience of senior officials from Islamic countries.
www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/10410467/Britain-to-become-first-non-Muslim-country-to-launch-sharia-bond.html

How Qatar bought Britain: They own the Shard. They own the Olympic Village.
And they don't care if their Lamborghinis get clamped when they shop at Harrods
(which is theirs, too)''

''If you walk into any Sainsbury's across the UK, remember that Qatar
is a major investor''

''On a state visit to the UK last year, the Emir and his royal consort were pictured
with the Queen and Prince Philip.
The couple were treated to a stay at Windsor Castle and given the full charm
offensive.
The consort, or Sheikha, proved a charmer in her own right. The second of the
Emir’s three wives, she won over Prince Philip as well as London’s fashionistas who claimed that
her ‘Gulf chic’ was ‘two parts Jackie O, one part Carrie Bradshaw’.
In fact, the two royal families have excellent relations. When Prince Charles wrote
a private letter to the Emir objecting to a Qatari-backed property development at
Chelsea Barracks, the Gulf state pulled out.''
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2113159/Qatar-bought-Britain-They-Shard-They-Olympic-Village-And-dont-care-Lamborghinis-clamped-shop-Harrods.html

Case study of the role of the Islamic sector in increasing access to financial
services: the United Kingdom
Dr. Elaine Housby
conference.qfis.edu.qa/app/media/208