Your donations are appreciated and help keep this site running. Even the smallest amount helps.
Thankyou

 
PROMOTE YOUR SITE
HERE
Only $3 USD/month
TRUTHSPOON.COM
The man they can't recruit!
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: Holocaust: when truth is outlawed (Sylvia Stolz speech)

Holocaust: when truth is outlawed (Sylvia Stolz speech) 28 Jan 2014 17:40 #1

Sylvia Stolz, a German Lawyer who was jailed for presenting evidence in the defence of her client in the criminal court trial in Germany of so-called holocaust denier Ernst Zundel, tells her story at the AZK (Anti-Zensor-Koalition) Conference in November 2012. In 2008, she was banned from speaking during the trial, barred from presenting evidence, and criminally charged with contempt of court, and with inciting contempt, and charged under the same section of the German Criminal Code as her client, and subsequently imprisoned for 3 years. She is also barred from practising law.
peech)
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. – Marcus Aurelius
Last Edit: 28 Jan 2014 17:42 by Return of Zorro.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy, PFIZIPFEI, Paul Tootall, Orangeaid, rodin, irongate

Holocaust: when truth is outlawed (Sylvia Stolz speech) 28 Jan 2014 17:51 #2

  • Paul Tootall
  • Paul Tootall's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Fresh Member
  • Currently researching things they don't want you to know
  • Posts: 428
  • Likes received: 606
Welcome to TZ Zorro. And yes, you are right, when the truth is a crime it's time to become a criminal.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: PFIZIPFEI, Worzel

Holocaust: when truth is outlawed (Sylvia Stolz speech) 28 Jan 2014 18:56 #3

Thanks. Yep, and as the saying goes... '' In times of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act.''

George Orwell.
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. – Marcus Aurelius
Last Edit: 28 Jan 2014 18:56 by Return of Zorro.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: PFIZIPFEI, Worzel, Paul Tootall, Orangeaid

Holocaust: when truth is outlawed (Sylvia Stolz speech) 28 Jan 2014 20:38 #4

  • Chuck Random
  • Chuck Random's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Posts: 1173
  • Likes received: 750
Well she did parade around a German courtroom declaring she was a Nazi and the court was illegitimate because it wasn't a Nazi court. Kinda like going into a court wearing a 'fuck the judge' t-shirt.

She wanted to argue Holocaust denial in a country where Holocaust denial is illegal. It's like the solicitor for a cocaine dealer stomping round the court engaging in angry posturing about why drugs should be legal. A court is based on what is lawful - it's not for arguing about what should be lawful. The woman's an idiot and IMO at the very bottom of the list of stuff to be concerned about. It's not remotely surprising she's barred from practicing law. I wouldn't trust her to deal with a parking ticket .

Nutzis are angry because Hitler lost the war and they like to pretend he didn't kill all those Jews. Cry me a river.
And you, my high-and-mighty judges, will never again experience inner peace... Your depiction of National Socialism as a criminal system will see to that. You are willing accomplices to the brainwashing and degradation of the German people.... Adolf Hitler accurately recognized the Jewish problem, the malevolent power of the Jews in certain respects... Yes, I share the values of National Socialism!"

www.iamthewitness.com/doc/Sylvia.Stolzs.Last.Words.in.Court.htm
No War But The Class War
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Hexhammer

Holocaust: when truth is outlawed (Sylvia Stolz speech) 29 Jan 2014 17:42 #5

Chuck Random wrote:
Well she did parade around a German courtroom declaring she was a Nazi and the court was illegitimate because it wasn't a Nazi court. Kinda like going into a court wearing a 'fuck the judge' t-shirt.

She wanted to argue Holocaust denial in a country where Holocaust denial is illegal. It's like the solicitor for a cocaine dealer stomping round the court engaging in angry posturing about why drugs should be legal. A court is based on what is lawful - it's not for arguing about what should be lawful. The woman's an idiot and IMO at the very bottom of the list of stuff to be concerned about. It's not remotely surprising she's barred from practicing law. I wouldn't trust her to deal with a parking ticket .

Nutzis are angry because Hitler lost the war and they like to pretend he didn't kill all those Jews. Cry me a river.
And you, my high-and-mighty judges, will never again experience inner peace... Your depiction of National Socialism as a criminal system will see to that. You are willing accomplices to the brainwashing and degradation of the German people.... Adolf Hitler accurately recognized the Jewish problem, the malevolent power of the Jews in certain respects... Yes, I share the values of National Socialism!"

www.iamthewitness.com/doc/Sylvia.Stolzs.Last.Words.in.Court.htm

Firstly why should questioning any part of our history be made illegal or a 'hate crime' in the first place? Truth does not fear scrutiny, because it has nothing to hide. All source criticism in a free and open society should be welcomed, should it not? Alas, we do not live in a free society though do we. We live in one where intellectually dishonest con artists persecute honest people who try and tell the other side of the story, because they're own argument, or rather lack of, isn't supported with scientific fact through legitimate debate. And as a result the truth continues to be hidden by a plethora of lies and deceit. Where questioning certain sacred cows i.e the 'Holocaust' is deemed 'anti-semitic' or 'hate speech'. One in which historians and authors that don't go along with the jewish narrative are persecuted, arrested and even imprisoned in certain countries. While other researchers, historians and writers have been victims of genuine hate crimes, prolonged and extensive smear campaigns, or having to cover expensive legal fees as well as costly fines. Their 'crime'; merely questioning the events of WWII or whether gas chambers were used as part of an extermination program. There's no wonder then why more and more good people are beginning to question the legitimacy of these kangeroo courts that imprison people merely for questioning history, which is nothing more than heavy handed 'thought policing'. It's absurd. So many people are under an emotional spell that teaches them they mustn't question certain things, and all because it may offend somebody. What utter bollox! Since when couldn't history be questioned because it may offend some sensitive soul?

There are major anomalies regarding the so called holocaust. Why is that? Surely such an event if it did indeed happen as written in the history books wouldn't need laws to forbid it being scrutinised, would it? It wasn't even mentioned in the memoirs of world leaders at the time. Neither Eisenhower or Churchill gave a single mention of a holocaust or gas chambers in their memoirs. Only labour camps are mentioned, which no revisionist denies by the way. There's overwhelming evidence that enemies of the state were imprisoned during the war, namely communist Jews, but not only jews. Germany wasn't the only country to do it either. The U.S imprisoned hunderds of thousand of Japanese and Germans as enemies of the state and political prisoners during the war. But there's no evidence for gas chambers or any extermination program in the German labour camps. Ironically it was the intensive allied bombing campaign of Germany that caused many of the casualties in the camps (vital supplies were eventually cut off because supply routes and industry was being detroyed), that and disease. And that's why we see so many survivors in the old photos of under nourished people. If they were gassing people straight off the trains as the official narrative goes, then why cut their hair first, and why was there so many survivors in these camps at the end of the war? These are all perfectly logical questions. Then there's also the sensationalist tales of the many survivors of 'gas chambers' that are now proven fake, like Anne Franks diary for instance, which is now proven to be a fraud. The exterminationist argument is full of holes, and is formed on atrocity propaganda and irrationality. Are you aware of the Red Cross report on the labour camps? RED CROSS EXPOSES “JEWISH” HOLOCAUST HOAX . Then there's the 6 million thing that's be used time and time again in recent history. The “Six Million” Jewish “holocaust” Myth

So why the need for so called denial laws? It's not rocket science, any reasonably intelligent person should be able to join the dots. By the way, I'm not driven at all by hatred, I just don't like lies. I seek the truth, and if I get called a ''nazi'' for questioning or criticising the official narrative, then so be it. I really couldn't care less what labels other people try and put on me. I don't allow atrocity propaganda to influence my opinions. People who allow this aren't thinking clearly, and they're allowing their emotions to rule their rational mind. When we don't question something just because it may offend, then free speech becomes the only victim.
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. – Marcus Aurelius
Last Edit: 29 Jan 2014 17:42 by Return of Zorro.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy, PFIZIPFEI, Paul Tootall, Orangeaid, Mario

Holocaust: when truth is outlawed (Sylvia Stolz speech) 29 Jan 2014 19:47 #6

  • Chuck Random
  • Chuck Random's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Posts: 1173
  • Likes received: 750
Zorro wrote:

Firstly why should questioning any part of our history be made illegal or a 'hate crime' in the first place? Truth does not fear scrutiny, because it has nothing to hide. All source criticism in a free and open society should be welcomed, should it not? Alas, we do not live in a free society though do we. We live in one where intellectually dishonest con artists persecute honest people who try and tell the other side of the story, because they're own argument, or rather lack of, isn't supported with scientific fact through legitimate debate. And as a result the truth continues to be hidden by a plethora of lies and deceit. Where questioning certain sacred cows i.e the 'Holocaust' is deemed 'anti-semitic' or 'hate speech'. One in which historians and authors that don't go along with the jewish narrative are persecuted, arrested and even imprisoned in certain countries. While other researchers, historians and writers have been victims of genuine hate crimes, prolonged and extensive smear campaigns, or having to cover expensive legal fees as well as costly fines. Their 'crime'; merely questioning the events of WWII or whether gas chambers were used as part of an extermination program.

I don't think Holocaust denial should be banned myself. But neither do I think modern Nazis (who only care about free speech for themselves) facing laws against it in some countries is some kind of monstrous human rights injustice to get all worked up about. Pardon me for not having 'Nazis for free speech' in another country as something I really give a fuck about in the grand scheme of tings worth giving a fuck about.
Holocaust denial is not banned here in the UK and frankly I can't see it really makes any difference.
There's no wonder then why more and more good people are beginning to question the legitimacy of these kangeroo courts that imprison people merely for questioning history, which is nothing more than heavy handed 'thought policing'. It's absurd. So many people are under an emotional spell that teaches them they mustn't question certain things, and all because it may offend somebody. What utter bollox! Since when couldn't history be questioned because it may offend some sensitive soul?

People have been coming out with this 'more and more people' stuff for at least 10 years while the actual output of Holocaust deniers has declined and CODOH remains a small endlessly repetitive minority conspiracy forum. There's arguably a few people drawn in by the popularity of general conspiracy theory stuff, but that's generally people copying and pasting old youtube videos and crappy articles and declaring it's research. In terms of actual research, tons of work has been done since Holocaust denial emerged and it's continually corroborated the notion that Hitler murdered 5-6 million Jews along with an awful lot of Gypsies and people with mental and physical disabilities simply because of who they were - though it's the Jews who always get highlighted by the exact same people fond of moaning about how people go on about the Jews being murdered.
There are major anomalies regarding the so called holocaust. Why is that? Surely such an event if it did indeed happen as written in the history books wouldn't need laws to forbid it being scrutinised, would it? It wasn't even mentioned in the memoirs of world leaders at the time. Neither Eisenhower or Churchill gave a single mention of a holocaust or gas chambers in their memoirs. Only labour camps are mentioned, which no revisionist denies by the way. There's overwhelming evidence that enemies of the state were imprisoned during the war, namely communist Jews, but not only jews. Germany wasn't the only country to do it either. The U.S imprisoned hunderds of thousand of Japanese and Germans as enemies of the state and political prisoners during the war. But there's no evidence for gas chambers or any extermination program in the German labour camps. Ironically it was the intensive allied bombing campaign of Germany that caused many of the casualties in the camps (vital supplies were eventually cut off because supply routes and industry was being detroyed), that and disease. And that's why we see so many survivors in the old photos of under nourished people. If they were gassing people straight off the trains as the official narrative goes, then why cut their hair first, and why was there so many survivors in these camps at the end of the war? These are all perfectly logical questions. Then there's also the sensationalist tales of the many survivors of 'gas chambers' that are now proven fake, like Anne Franks diary for instance, which is now proven to be a fraud. The exterminationist argument is full of holes, and is formed on atrocity propaganda and irrationality. Are you aware of the Red Cross report on the labour camps? RED CROSS EXPOSES “JEWISH” HOLOCAUST HOAX . Then there's the 6 million thing that's be used time and time again in recent history. The “Six Million” Jewish “holocaust” Myth

:killinme:

Let's just take one of these for brevity.
Are you aware of the Red Cross report on the labour camps?

And. So. What?

What was the actual situation of the Red Cross during WWII? Did they have sweeping powers akin to UN weapons in Iraq to barge around going exactly where they liked or were they rather limited in what they could actually do?
Did they then or have they ever claimed they knew with any kind of actual accuracy what exactly was happening to the extent of being able to compile authoritative statistics or did they compile limited information based on what they knew?
What kind of 'truthseekers' who put things on the internet would on one hand make grand claims about that Red Cross document while ignoring or handwaving something like the Korherr report (which is the kind of 'truthseeking' you see repeatedly with this stuff)?
Do you seriously believe there is some kind of enormous conspiracy involving thousands of historians across Europe to suppress some kind of hidden truth that conveniently exculpates the Nazis busted wide open by a minority of outright Nazis coupled with a few contrarians armed with a selection of decontextualised factoids?

Answer all those questions and maybe we can then consider another of your claims.

So why the need for so called denial laws? It's not rocket science, any reasonably intelligent person should be able to join the dots. By the way, I'm not driven at all by hatred, I just don't like lies. I seek the truth, and if I get called a ''nazi'' for questioning or criticising the official narrative, then so be it. I really couldn't care less what labels other people try and put on me. I don't allow atrocity propaganda to influence my opinions. People who allow this aren't thinking clearly, and they're allowing their emotions to rule their rational mind. When we don't question something just because it may offend, then free speech becomes the only victim.

Why do some countries ban denial of Soviet atrocities and/or genocide denial in general? Does that suggest this guy is correct?



Check out his stuff

msuweb.montclair.edu/~furrg/research/furr_katyn_preprint_0813.pdf

So do you take this seriously too? If not, why not? Looks uncannily like the same kind of stuff Holocaust deniers come out with to me.
No War But The Class War
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Holocaust: when truth is outlawed (Sylvia Stolz speech) 29 Jan 2014 20:00 #7

  • Chuck Random
  • Chuck Random's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Posts: 1173
  • Likes received: 750
Though couldn't resist this one -
like Anne Franks diary for instance, which is now proven to be a fraud

No it isn't. That stems from some biro markings that ended up on the manuscript. You can easily 'research' that for yourself.

But the real kicker is - even if it was so what? What would it matter?

Anne Frank's diary just happened to catch the public imagination. It's not particularly dramatic in what it talks about - unless you want to go totally into La La Land and claim the Nazis did not in fact round up Jews and put them in concentration camps. There are 10s if not 100s of thousands of comparable documents. Like find out what the Oyneg Shabbos was - that is the tip of the iceberg.

So what point do you think you're making?
Or do you think EVERYTHING anyone wrote about how Hitler treated the Jews rater shabbily is fake?

Mate, you're not thinking critically by imbibing and regurgitating factoids you encountered online without even considering if it means anything anyway.
No War But The Class War
Last Edit: 29 Jan 2014 20:04 by Chuck Random.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Holocaust: when truth is outlawed (Sylvia Stolz speech) 29 Jan 2014 21:01 #8

  • Chuck Random
  • Chuck Random's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Posts: 1173
  • Likes received: 750
If they were gassing people straight off the trains as the official narrative goes, then why cut their hair first, and why was there so many survivors in these camps at the end of the war?

Strawman. The Nazis generally utilised Jews deemed fit for work as slave labour. It's not as if the Auschwitz selections aren't a very well known aspect of the Holocaust is it?
This was not totally consistent - for example some Russian Jews were shot wholesale outside their villages. I mean, Auschwitz - the largest camp - was the size of a town and spread over three separate sites with numerous small satellite camps. People survived for a variety of reasons. Examples include those who survived the death marches into the Reich at the end of the war and were subsequently liberated, those who managed to escape or those who broke out like in the revolt at Sobibor.

I'm not sure exactly what they used the hair for, but a bunch of documents survive demonstrating they did collect it. Here's an example -

nuremberg.law.harvard.edu/php/search.php?DI=1&FieldFlag=11&NMTID=2&MTNo=3680&MTNoSuff=

So what significance does collecting hair have to whether Jews were exterminated?
No War But The Class War
Last Edit: 29 Jan 2014 21:04 by Chuck Random.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Holocaust: when truth is outlawed (Sylvia Stolz speech) 29 Jan 2014 21:13 #9

  • Chuck Random
  • Chuck Random's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Posts: 1173
  • Likes received: 750
Ironically it was the intensive allied bombing campaign of Germany that caused many of the casualties in the camps (vital supplies were eventually cut off because supply routes and industry was being detroyed),

So how come these magic Allied evil smart bombs managed to destroy the food supplies of camp inmates but mysteriously leave camp guards and the nearby populations adequately fed?

The situation became totally apocalyptic at the end of the war because the Nazis insisted on shipping huge numbers of camp inmates into the Reich ahead of the Soviet advance and stuffing them into camps already grim enough when it was already clear they'd lost the war anyway.
No War But The Class War
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Holocaust: when truth is outlawed (Sylvia Stolz speech) 29 Jan 2014 21:19 #10

  • Chuck Random
  • Chuck Random's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Posts: 1173
  • Likes received: 750
There's overwhelming evidence that enemies of the state were imprisoned during the war, namely communist Jews, but not only jews. Germany wasn't the only country to do it either. The U.S imprisoned hunderds of thousand of Japanese and Germans as enemies of the state and political prisoners during the war.

There was absolutely no distinction between Jews who were communist and those who were not. Indeed, German communists (including German Jewish ones) were rounded up before the Jews in general were in Germany. Prior to that, Jews were subjected to all kinds of insane laws including being banned from owning a radio, driving a car or keeping a pet.
At that stage it was more comparable to 'whites only' signs in America. Which was abhorrent too surely?

Sure Britain rounded up Germans when war broke out. Including, funnily enough, Jewish Germans . How does that justify persecuting and killing people on the basis they're Jewish?
No War But The Class War
Last Edit: 29 Jan 2014 21:34 by Chuck Random.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Holocaust: when truth is outlawed (Sylvia Stolz speech) 29 Jan 2014 21:23 #11

  • Chuck Random
  • Chuck Random's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Posts: 1173
  • Likes received: 750
Neither Eisenhower or Churchill gave a single mention of a holocaust or gas chambers in their memoirs

Why would they? The plight of the Jews specifically had less prominence then than the Holocaust does today and neither of them stopped it happening (it's debatable if they could have done more). What reason did they have to bang on about it in their why I was so awesome during the war publications?
They don't - AFAIK - mention T4 either - does that mean the Nazis didn't murder mentally and disabled people as well?
No War But The Class War
Last Edit: 29 Jan 2014 21:28 by Chuck Random.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Holocaust: when truth is outlawed (Sylvia Stolz speech) 29 Jan 2014 21:59 #12

  • Chuck Random
  • Chuck Random's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Posts: 1173
  • Likes received: 750
But there's no evidence for gas chambers or any extermination program in the German labour camps

There is abundant evidence. Though the Nazis tried to hide their activities (increasingly so as the killings escalated - they were more cavalier about early shootings in Russia) lots of people (including Nazis themselves) said quite bluntly Jews were being exterminated. This is corroborated by other evidence,
What Holocaust deniers do is accuse all witnesses of lying (witness testimony in this case apparently has to be 100% consistent at all times in stark defiance of what any psychologist or policeman will tell you about how witness testimony rarely contains no errors, exaggerations, conflations, distortions etc and if one person is unreliable they all must be), claim all Nazis were tortured and other evidence is faked, means something else or both or whatever. Then they make up what they'd like to have happened and say that did instead, their scrupulous hyper-criticism mysteriously disappearing at this point. Hells bells, they can't even explain what happened to all those Jews documented as going into various camps and never coming out again. I think there's supposed to be some lost land of the Jews somewhere in Siberia or something.

Mate, you're better off believing aliens built the moon. At least that's kinda fun.
No War But The Class War
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Holocaust: when truth is outlawed (Sylvia Stolz speech) 19 Dec 2014 20:26 #13

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960




In fact nothing was heard in the msm about those charges since then ....


:)
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Orangeaid

Holocaust: when truth is outlawed (Sylvia Stolz speech) 20 Dec 2014 13:10 #14

  • Cinta
  • Cinta's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Never Again
  • ''None are more hopelessly enslaved,than those who falsely believe they are free
  • Posts: 5339
  • Likes received: 1070
PFIZIPFEI wrote:




In fact nothing was heard in the msm about those charges since then ....


:)

Ever heard of the saying WOLF IN SHEEP CLOTHES !?
Another hypocrite post Putz

This kind of disgusting and disrespectful behaviour is condoned here

ORANGEAID verbal abuse

''Cinta is a whore.
I don't change one word I've said.''

truth-zone.net/forum/members-area/67105-open-up-the-clarity-zone-to-all-tz-members-we-need-transparency-and-not-secrecy.html?start=80#209733
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Holocaust: when truth is outlawed (Sylvia Stolz speech) 20 Dec 2014 14:26 #15

  • Orangeaid
  • Orangeaid's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 11636
  • Likes received: 8003
Why is it illegal to deny the Holocaust in Germany Cinta?

If the Holocaust is true then surely no one would deny it? Further, if its true then there would be no need for so called denial laws to exist would there be?

Why do you persist to demonize National Socialism ... well at least try to :hahano: ? It's your real fear isn't it, as a Jewess, that people will get to understand NS and the movement will gain grass roots traction again?

That's your fear isn't it Jewess?
Last Edit: 20 Dec 2014 14:27 by Orangeaid.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy, PFIZIPFEI, Return of Zorro

Holocaust: when truth is outlawed (Sylvia Stolz speech) 20 Dec 2014 19:53 #16

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960

a German Lawyer who was jailed for presenting evidence in
the defence of her client in the criminal court trial in Germany



This sentence alone should wake up all demoncrazy dreamers!

In reality this is highly criminal ANARCHISM, illegal chaos tyranny of the self-chosen misanthropic few against the peoples of earth.


It can't be repeated often enough that the FRG is a NGO on the occupied territory of the LEGALLY still existing German Reich,
NO STATE! No matter how hard the msm mouthpieces try to convey this illusion.

Thus the terms "German" and "Germany" are DELIBERATELY used by the system mouthpieces like "The Washington Post" and "Der Spiegel" to obfuscate and to confuse the ignorant masses, they are definitely inept and misleading. It's the FRG Ltd. that is imprisoning those who dare to speak out, which clearly shows how much afraid the protagonists are. They hate nothing more than the truth and free speech!


=> truth-zone.net/forum/government-and-authority/63444-constitution.html#141141

=> truth-zone.net/forum/government-and-authority/60509-un-what-is-this-who-created-it-how-when-and-for-what-reason.html#104818



Basics in a nutshell -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0PYkj6sgtc

.
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 20 Dec 2014 20:41 by PFIZIPFEI.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Return of Zorro, Orangeaid

Frauen 4 Truth: Lady Sylvia Stolz 05 Jan 2015 11:04 #17

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960
Frauen 4 Truth: Lady Sylvia Stolz





Video description:
From Nuremberg to Mannheim.
(Eng Subtitles)

International Frauentag 8.3.
- Frauen 4 Truth




P.S. "chuck random" at al. seem to be back on TZ, methinks
:cool2:
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Return of Zorro

Holocaust: when truth is outlawed (Sylvia Stolz speech) 05 Jan 2015 14:17 #18

  • Orangeaid
  • Orangeaid's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 11636
  • Likes received: 8003
German Patriot Defence Lawyer SylviaStolz was sentenced to 3 and-a-half years in prison and disbarred for 5 years.

Below Sylvia's comments to the court.

She says the Court is perverting and repressing the truth with the cudgel of "Holocaust," making a mockery of justice. Her trial has made clear the criminal absurdity of prosecuting "Holocaust Denial." How can one deny something that never existed? She says these entire proceedings began as a show trial in a kangaroo court and never progressed beyond that point. The main proceedings were projected with smoke and mirrors and the official fairy tale of "Holocaust" was enforced by undisguised force. She observes that the political intent of the Court is the ultimate eradication of the German Nation and its replacement by a mongrelized and deculturated population of mindless consumers.

Sylvia says she is confident that she has succeeded in exposing this Court to the whole world as an agent that is hostile to the German Nation. By openly and flagrantly violating the law, this Court flees before the truth. Incessantly, like turning a prayer wheel, it has rejected her every evidentiary motion with the cynical pretext of "abuse of courtprocedure." ..... She has hope and faith that the German Nation will someday bring this treacherous Court to justice.

Sylvia describes how the Defense was forced to accept the contents of the indictment, and this caused the Court's desired verdict to be the inevitable consequence. In the absence of material evidence, the Court relied on its infantile rulings that "Abuse of Procedure = Criminal Act." Thanks to this judicial sleight of hand, there was no assumption of innocence and the Court did not have to prove guilt.

Sylvia asks: to what is Grossmann referring when he mentions "domestic and foreign" court verdicts? Could he be referring to the Nuremberg show trials? The Allied Military Tribunal was nothing but a postwar Talmudic Inquisition conducted by Germany's enemies. It featured witnesses with "built-in credibility" and Jewish testimony that could never be questioned or authenticated.

She asks: what would people like Grossmann do without the official obligatory fairy tale of "Holocaust?" Her trial has again demonstrated that world political powers are players in the "Holocaust" game (or "Holocaust Industry" as Prof. Norman Finkelstein calls it, he should know, since both of his parents were interned at Auschwitz during the War.) This explains why objective historical research is still suppressed, sixty-three years after the end of the War. As an example of ongoing intellectual repression in Germany Sylvia refers to the "Hermann Case" in which a popular commentator was fired for referring to such positive aspects of National Socialism as its family policy and the construction of Autobahns.

Sylvia demonstrates that the Court's procedural system is very, very simple. It consists of disallowing all evidentiary motions as "abuse of Court procedure," which is a criminal act. She says that the District Attorney's closing tirade was beneath all legal criticism, nothing but purest slander and abuse.....Then Sylviashows how powerful interests profit greatly by inculcating a negative self-image into German society, with their incessant propaganda and brainwashing. If Germans were as evil as Grossmann depicts them, they would long ago have skinned him alive.

She points out that under the present Talmudic Inquisition, anyone who calls attention to the destructive nature of Judaism can be punished. Glenz tells the Court Reporter to write that remark down as well. Sylvia observes that today, no one is allowed to say anything the least bit derogatory about Jews, and yet the necessary first step toward changing and improving conditions in Germany is recognizing the cause of our malaise. She says that Horst Mahler's writings provide the proof for this, and she will stand by this assertion. Glenz orders the Reporter:"Put that in too!"

Sylvia continues and remarks that Germany now stands under the yoke of world Judaism. Glenz threatens: "We are going to cut off your final address if..." But Sylvia ignores him and says that following World War II, the real criminals took over the world. Glenz growls "I'm warning you!" but Sylvia again urges the public to consider the causes of Germany's plight and continue gathering and considering the material evidence. She tells the Court that National Socialism is not dead, regardless of how much Grossmann and his ilk wish it were dead. She says that National Socialism represents what is good and enduring in the German spirit. Idealism and patriotism are rigidly suppressed at this time but they cannot be suppressed forever.

Turning toward Grossmann and the Court, she asks:

"Is he German? Or is he perhaps related to that Moshe Grossmann who for four years following the end of World War II continued torturing and murdering German slaves in the East, as the Jewish author John Sack reports in his book An Eye for an Eye?"

Then she turns to the Bench and asks:

"What about you — are you Germans?" "German" stands for honor and steadfastness! Think of Deutsche Treue! Nobody can call what is going on in this court as "honorable." In this court, the only "justice" is inspired by the Talmud!"

Sylvia expresses her faith that history will take its inevitable course and "the truth will win out." She says that since the trial began she has been prepared for her preordained conviction — she told them at the beginning that she knew her verdict was handed down, even before her indictment. To the Bench she says

"And you, my high-and-mighty judges, will never again experience inner peace... Your depiction of National Socialism as a criminal system will see to that. You are willing accomplices to the brainwashing and degradation of the German people.... Adolf Hitler accurately recognized the Jewish problem, the malevolent power of the Jews in certain respects... Yes, I share the values of National Socialism!"

Sylvia replies,

"If my actions bring a little more light into this dark hour for Germany, then I will gladly go to prison! It does not bother me that I am officially ridiculed and insulted by this despicable court and atrocious government... My high and mighty judges, you are convicting yourselves, not me."

Source: twincities.indymedia.org/newswire/display/32751/index.php

iamthewitness.com
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: PFIZIPFEI, Return of Zorro

German Lawyer Sylvia Stolz has been convicted again 08 Mar 2015 09:39 #19

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960




German Lawyer Sylvia Stolz has been jailed again



Sylvia Stolz, the former defence attorney for Ernst Zundel has been convicted today in a Munich court, once again under the tyrannical BRD laws concerning so-called “holocaust denial” and thereby “inciting racial hatred”. She was sentenced to 20 months in prison with no possibility of parole.

The case stems from her presentation at the AZK in Switzerland in 2012 where she spoke about “Free Speech”, and her previous conviction under §130, the court procedures, banned speech, banned evidence and banned legal defence.

It mattered not to the court that the “offence” took place outside of the BRD. The host of the AZK (Anti-Zensur-Koalition) Ivo Sasek is also facing criminal charges stemming from this event and the presentation given by Sylvia Stolz, see below.



Full text, video and comments: justice4germans.com/2015/02/25/former-german-lawyer-sylvia-stolz-has-been-jailed-again/







STOIC SYLVIA by diggerfortruth - helping the Light overcome the darkness







Source and comments: diggerfortruth.wordpress.com/2015/02/26/stoic-sylvia/
.
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 08 Mar 2015 09:56 by PFIZIPFEI.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy, chandrakavi, Return of Zorro, Orangeaid

Holocaust: when truth is outlawed (Sylvia Stolz speech) 08 Mar 2015 10:12 #20

  • Orangeaid
  • Orangeaid's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 11636
  • Likes received: 8003
Great to see you back Pfiz. :thumbup:
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: PFIZIPFEI
Moderators: novum, rodin, Flare
Powered by Kunena Forum

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it. Secure transactions via paypal.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2019 - May 2020, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 270 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 100 - Raised
( £ 80 GBP )
donation thermometer
29%
Updated
31st May 2019

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.