Your donations are appreciated and help keep this site running. Even the smallest amount helps.
Thankyou

 
PROMOTE YOUR SITE
HERE
Only $3 USD/month
TRUTHSPOON.COM
The man they can't recruit!
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2

TOPIC: United Nations Agenda 21 / Agenda 2030 & Sustainable Development

United Nations Agenda 21 / Agenda 2030 & Sustainable Development 13 Jul 2014 00:32 #1

  • peacenik
  • peacenik's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Immortal
  • Posts: 3179
  • Likes received: 1607
This is a simple, easy to understand, discussion about Agena 21 and how it will effect you. Powerful stuff! You can even predict the future with this kind of info, or at the very least, some of the baffling happenings in this world will no longer be such a mystery..

This is a must see, relatively short video.

Birth is not a beginning; death is not an end. There is existence without limitation; there is continuity without a starting point.” ~ Chuang Tzu
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: novum, Frog

United Nations Agenda 21 / Agenda 2030 & Sustainable Development 13 Jul 2014 00:50 #2

  • Frog
  • Frog's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Senior Boarder 
  • Government is simply a conspiracy against a nation!
  • Posts: 2072
  • Likes received: 1701
And here's the official promo for dummies.


"Whenever you're in conflict with someone, there is one factor that can make the difference between damaging your relationship and deepening it. That factor is attitude." William James
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: peacenik

United Nations Agenda 21 / Agenda 2030 & Sustainable Development 13 Jul 2014 01:12 #3

  • peacenik
  • peacenik's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Immortal
  • Posts: 3179
  • Likes received: 1607
Illegal immigration, the homosexual agenda, rabid environmentalism, pedophilia, gun control, pornography, rampant socialism, and a host of other ills effecting the US are becoming more clear, now that I have seen the video. These are all arms, subsidiaries, or vehicles of Agenda 21. :thumbup:
Birth is not a beginning; death is not an end. There is existence without limitation; there is continuity without a starting point.” ~ Chuang Tzu
Last Edit: 13 Jul 2014 01:21 by peacenik.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

United Nations Agenda 21 / Agenda 2030 & Sustainable Development 13 Jul 2014 01:18 #4

  • peacenik
  • peacenik's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Immortal
  • Posts: 3179
  • Likes received: 1607
Frog wrote:
And here's the official promo for dummies.


Never ever trust a politician or statesman who uses phrases like, "sustained development", "habatant for humanity" or "world citizen".. These are all code phrases for, Agenda 21.
Birth is not a beginning; death is not an end. There is existence without limitation; there is continuity without a starting point.” ~ Chuang Tzu
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Frog

United Nations Agenda 21 / Agenda 2030 & Sustainable Development 14 Jul 2014 06:30 #5

  • peacenik
  • peacenik's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Immortal
  • Posts: 3179
  • Likes received: 1607
Agenda 21, is Bolshevism with a happy face. :)

Has anyone else noticed, Agenda 21 appears to be modeled after the old Communist International?

Could it be, the Communist International didn't really die, it just went through a name change? It's now called "globalism"!
Birth is not a beginning; death is not an end. There is existence without limitation; there is continuity without a starting point.” ~ Chuang Tzu
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

United Nations Agenda 21 / Agenda 2030 & Sustainable Development 14 Jul 2014 09:42 #6

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 18539
  • Likes received: 8710
Whatever its modelled after, whatever one wishes to call it, it is gonna be homogenization of the masses, while the richest maintain their status quo and control absolutely everything, including food and water. You could call it 'all animals are equal but some are more equal than others' :wissl:

Im seeing it unfold right now in rural australia where the rural populations are being decimated, house prices have halved in just a few years in some rural areas places and there is an exodus to cities and large reduction in local food production, which is typically the main activity in rural areas. Its all by design.

Australia is typically a test bed for agendas, it has a relatively small and placid population, even when people think things are no good, they either tend to do nothing about it or have no idea how to go about reversing what was forced onto them. Most of the time though id have to say the majority cant even see what is being done to them, they dont realise what is going on and that the politicians are puppets for a globalist agenda.

Ann Bressington Exposes UN Agenda 21



Ann Marie Bressington (born 12 September 1955) is an Australian politician. She was elected to the South Australian Legislative Council at the 2006 South Australian election as Nick Xenophon's running mate on his independent No Pokies ticket.

Her election was a surprise as it was not expected that two people on the ticket would be elected.
I remember the good old days, when 90+ year olds in nursing homes lived forever. Darn this pesky virus.

1365 = 1

1.1365 = 1,283,305,580,313,352
Last Edit: 12 Aug 2020 08:44 by novum. Reason: fix broken video
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

United Nations Agenda 21 / Agenda 2030 & Sustainable Development 15 Jul 2014 01:42 #7

  • peacenik
  • peacenik's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Immortal
  • Posts: 3179
  • Likes received: 1607
novum wrote:
Whatever its modelled after, whatever one wishes to call it, it is gonna be homogenization of the masses, while the richest maintain their status quo and control absolutely everything, including food and water. You could call it 'all animals are equal but some are more equal than others' :wissl:

Im seeing it unfold right now in rural australia where the rural populations are being decimated, house prices have halved in just a few years in some rural areas places and there is an exodus to cities and large reduction in local food production, which is typically the main activity in rural areas. Its all by design.

Australia is typically a test bed for agendas, it has a relatively small and placid population, even when people think things are no good, they either tend to do nothing about it or have no idea how to go about reversing what was forced onto them. Most of the time though id have to say the majority cant even see what is being done to them, they dont realise what is going on and that the politicians are puppets for a globalist agenda.

Ann Bressington Exposes UN Agenda 21



Ann Marie Bressington (born 12 September 1955) is an Australian politician. She was elected to the South Australian Legislative Council at the 2006 South Australian election as Nick Xenophon's running mate on his independent No Pokies ticket.

Her election was a surprise as it was not expected that two people on the ticket would be elected.

Informative video!

As I've said earlier in this thread, you can predict the future with knowledge of Agenda 21. I now believe Agenda 21 poses the greatest threat to our freedom than anything else. It is the scariest thing I've ever read. Even more scary than the book, "1984" by George Orwell.
Birth is not a beginning; death is not an end. There is existence without limitation; there is continuity without a starting point.” ~ Chuang Tzu
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

United Nations Agenda 21 / Agenda 2030 & Sustainable Development 15 Jul 2014 07:43 #8

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 18539
  • Likes received: 8710
Australias Murray Darling Basin.
At a time of acute global food shortage, the WWF seeks to achieve its stated goal of reducing the world’s population by snaring Australia’s premier food bowl in its web of international conventions covering wetlands and biodiversity to lock it away from food production.

The New Citizen documents:

Every stage of the process to smash food production in the Basin was and is directed top-down by Prince Philip’s organisations—WWF Australia, the Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF), and the so-called Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists.

The WWF started the Wentworth Group in late 2002, in an enraged reaction to the CEC’s February 2002 New Citizen special report, “The Infrastructure Road to Recovery”, which presented a vision for national economic development centred upon 18 great water diversion projects to green the deserts and feed hundreds of millions of people; in order to crush the very idea of such development, the Wentworth Group seeks to make an example of the Murray-Darling Basin.

Since 2002, the Wentworth Group, funded by an unholy alliance of the WWF and multinational banks, either instigated, influenced and/or outright dictated John Howard’s 2004 National Water Initiative, his National Water Commission, his and Malcolm Turnbull’s Water Act 2007, and the resulting Murray-Darling Basin Authority and its blueprint for genocide, the Guide to the proposed Basin Plan.


I remember the good old days, when 90+ year olds in nursing homes lived forever. Darn this pesky virus.

1365 = 1

1.1365 = 1,283,305,580,313,352
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Frog, peacenik

United Nations Agenda 21 / Agenda 2030 & Sustainable Development 06 Oct 2014 03:17 #9

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 18539
  • Likes received: 8710

Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment.
Agenda 21, the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, and the Statement of principles for the Sustainable Management of Forests were adopted by more than 178 Governments at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) held in Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992.
The Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) was created in December 1992 to ensure effective follow-up of UNCED, to monitor and report on implementation of the agreements at the local, national, regional and international levels. It was agreed that a five year review of Earth Summit progress would be made in 1997 by the United Nations General Assembly meeting in special session.
The full implementation of Agenda 21, the Programme for Further Implementation of Agenda 21 and the Commitments to the Rio principles, were strongly reaffirmed at the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) held in Johannesburg, South Africa from 26 August to 4 September 2002.


www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?documentid=52
sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf

Member States
sustainabledevelopment.un.org/memberstates.html

...

Esoteric Agenda: Agenda 21

The sustainable goal is the elimination of the middle class. The world cannot support 6+ billion people. The plan behind Sustainable Development includes population control. It is a program for land control, education control and population control. The leaders of the Sustainable Movement said that the world human population should not exceed 500 million people. That is a 93% reduction in today's population. In 1992 while the Rio conference ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Conference_on_Sustainable_Development ) was going on, George Bush, then president, was there. He was just off shore in Prince Charles' yacht where he executed the Agenda 21 protocol on behalf of the US and brought it back to Washington DC. Within a year Bill Clinton by Executive Order, established the President's Council for Sustainable Development ( clinton2.nara.gov/PCSD/ ).

In 1993 Bill Clinton set up the President Council on Sustainable Development and one of the dictates for Agenda 21 is that every country in the world should set up a National Council to oversee the implementation of Agenda 21. I have listened to Gorbachev explain: "We are writing a new set of 10 or 15 Commandments to replace the original 10" ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones ). Which one of the 10 do you think these guys don't like?
Thou shalt not lie?
Thou shalt not steal?
Thou shalt not covet?
Because I will tell you what. These people have lied to us, they're in the process of stealing all of this nation's natural resources, and they covet everything you have left.

To explain the map ( www.watersworld.us/agenda-21-map-thmb52b.jpg ). The red are areas that will be off limits to human beings. If you live there, you won't. Yellow areas are for major control of all human activity. If you live there, you won't. Black dots are the smart growth zones, where human beings are to be stacked and packed in small living units along rail tracks. The smart growth program also only has jobs assigned and children cared for by the state.

And in conjunction with Codex Alimentarius, food will be limited and water consumption will be decreased to 10 gallons per day per person. That is over a 90% reduction in people's average daily water consumption. And along with shortages of food and water, the food we will be provided with will be genetically manipulated and nutrient deficient. Genetic manipulation of food causes
complications in metabolizing and utilizing food for energy.

In January 2003 scientists reported that the gene sequence of the inserted genes into crops had actually changed their order. They had re-scrambled, so that genetic inserts are not stable. Another laboratory confirmed this and found that it changed the same varieties in different ways, so not only is it unstable and changing, it is not even uniform in the way it is changing. This is incredibly
dangerous. Nutrient deficiencies due to Codex's planned vitamin and mineral ban will cause billions of preventable diseases. Both of these will ultimately lead to billions of deaths.

In 1970 just three years after the publication of the Iron Mountain Report, which calls for , if we are going to create a world government we can no longer use war as a mechanism to cause fear amongst populations and therefore allow us to control the behavior of populations through fear. And they settled on, in 1967, in their publication called the Iron Mountain Report, the Environmental Holocaust. In 1970, 3 years after that publication the Council of Foreign Relations ( www.cfr.org/ / www.chathamhouse.org/ ) began to publish a series of articles describing ecological holocaust that was facing the world and in this particular issue, the first issue done by George Keenan, to prevent a world disaster it sums up in three points that the eco-crisis is a global threat so great that it endangers all of life on earth. Aurelio Peccei who actually created the Club of Rome ( www.clubofrome.org/ ), and is in the inner, inner circle of the global elitists in 1991 stated that while searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming and the like would fit the bill. All of these dangers are caused by human intervention. The real enemy then is humanity itself ( www.amazon.com/The-First-Global-Revolution-Council/dp/0679738258 The book itself was printed in 1991 but the sentence in question is referring to something that occurred ~20+ years prior).

Let's take a look at Al Gore's award winning and Nobel Peace Prize movie An Inconvenient Truth ( www.imdb.com/title/tt0497116/ ).
It will shake you to your core, If you love your planet, If you love your children, You have to see this film.
If you look at the 10 hottest years ever measured, they have all occurred in the last 14 years and the hottest of all was 2005. We are causing global warming. This is really not a political issue so much as a moral issue. Temperature increases are taking place all over the world and that is causing stronger storms. Is it possible that we should prepare against other threats besides terrorists?
The Arctic is experiencing faster melting. If this were to go, sea level world wide would go up 20 feet. This is what would happen in Florida. Around Shanghai home to 40 million people. The area around Culcutta - 60 million. Here's Manhattan, the World Trade Centre Memorial would be under water. Think of the impact of a couple of thousand refugees and then image one hundred million. Those who deny global warming are just flat out wrong.
Helen Goodman from the Boston Globe wrote 'Let's just say that global warming deniers are now on a par with holocaust deniers'.

Scientists silenced for questioning the threat of global warming. I've had several friends who have essentially been told if you speak out on climate change, you must do so as citizens. If you do so through our organization, our institution, you will essentially be fired. Once you realize how many holes there are in the consensus solution you may begin to open up your mind to the other side of the global warming debate as a whole. The only consensus I am aware of is that it is warming in the last century. They completely ignore the fact that there is this thing called the Oregon Petition that was signed by 19,000 professionals and scientists who don't agree with the idea that we are causing climate change. I can't tell you how many calls I have received from parents saying their kids are now being shown an Inconvenient Truth completely unchallenged not just in science class but in art and math classes. I have to speak out and say that the science we have is still incomplete and the science we are being told by the IPPC ( www.ipcc.ch/ ) is really incorrect science.

Lets put this to you bluntly. Global warming is a complete fallacy. All Gore received a Grammy and the Nobel Peace Prize for a film that is filled with holes and mis-truths.

Ice cores taken 2,000 meters below the surface have enabled us to look at the last 160,000 years. We believe that in Greenland, the medieval warming period was about one and a half degrees warmer on average than today.

And they also show consistently warmer temperatures thousands of years ago before man made green house gasses existed.

You can see that in the period between 4,000 years ago and back to the period 2,000 years ago, which is actually the Roman Age, the temperatures have been decreasing in Greenland by two and a half degrees.

Al Gore is made out to be a revolutionary figure attempting to save the planet, which is quite true, he just doesn't mention the fact that saving the earth does not involve you. According to his agenda, it will result in massive land repossessions and extreme limitations of food and water and fossil fuels for the public. And please note that Al Gore is a sustainable developer. The Global warming lie is very popular today because it receives major media coverage and has an attractively titled goal of 'saving the planet'. But how does this tie in with Agenda 21?

The result of the 1992 Earth Summit Conference in Rio de Janeiro was the Kyoto Treaty ( unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/items/2830.php ). The Kyoto Treaty states that every country must drastically reduce the use of fossil fuels by mandate of the United Nations ( www.un.org/en/ ).

(Bill Clinton) Concentrations of greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere are at their highest levels in more than 200,000 years. If the trend is not changed, scientists expect the seas to rise 2 feet or more over the next century. Island chains such as the Maldives will disappear from the map unless we reverse the predictions.

And as of June 2007, 172 nations and other government entities have ratified the Treaty. And if you were wondering how this ties into putting the earth's priority above human survival in accordance with pagan beliefs, every country's deadline for the implementation of Agenda 21 and the kyoto Treaty is in 2012. And if this wasn't enough, when the Pentagon was damaged in 911, they set a goal to have a completely new and improved Pentagon in December 2012 ( www.azicri.org/Default.aspx?pageId=1101701&eventId=530614&EventViewMode=EventDetails ).

So CODEX Alimentarius ( www.codexalimentarius.org/ ) goes into effect at the end of 2009 which gives it three years for the Codex regulations on food to start the process of creating billions of preventable diseases and deaths. When citizens of every nation are dying of starvation and diseases and fear for their lives because of global warming and major catastrophes, they will do what the public has been proven to do in times of great peril. They will beg for their government to step in and do something.

How are they going to get you to join the new economy? They are going to say, "we have a solution". You see one of the tricks of the Illuminati is they create a problem and then they provide a solution when you beg them to. And pray tell, what will the United Nations suggest when there is a global problem? They will demand a global government, a New World Order, Exactly as the Maya, Hopi, Kali Yuga and many other pagan civilizations prophesied.

By 2012 the Kyoto Treaty, Agenda 21, CODEX Alimentarius and the new Pentagon will be fully operational to enforce a New World Order (once they decide to trigger the next phase). And the New World Religion is obvious, we will all worship the earth, Gaia, the mother goddess we saved from extinction from global warming.

We will be told that to keep from repeating the mistakes that we made in the past, we must hold the earth in higher regard than humans, just as pagan traditions require.
This is too obvious to ignore. It is right in front of our faces, yet we still refuse to see it. Why do you think the United Nations are consistently trying to disarm the public and the nations? They don’t want us to be capable of fighting back. One poof of this is in the film released by the UN called ‘Armed to the Teeth: The Worldwide Plague of Small Arms’ ( films.com/id/5967/Armed_to_the_Teeth_The_Worldwide_Plague_of_Small_Arms.htm )where it demonizes gun ownership. It is also shown in the Freedom from War Policy ( dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/arms/freedom_war.html ) put in place by JFK in 1961. President John Kennedy went to the United Nations September 1961 and he presented the US Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World during a speech and he said this is the official program of the United States of America. It is a disarmament program, and it calls for the US to turn over its military to the UN. Let that sit for a second. It calls for the US to turn over its military to the United Nations. The program ends by saying progressive controlled disarmament would proceed to a point where no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened UN peace force. The UN would have all military power.

This policy outlines some pretty scary scenarios when you understand what it reads. It calls for the disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their re-establishment in any form whatsoever, other than those required to preserve internal order and for contributions to a UN Peace Force. This clearly shows that the UN is calling for all military power to be under their control.
Inspection and verification must establish both that nations carry out scheduled limitations or reductions and that they do not retain armed forces and armament in excess of those permitted at any stage of the disarmament process. Strategic delivery vehicles reduced. Arms and armed forces will be reduced and all the while UN peace keeping powers would be strengthened.

A United Nations peace observation group would be available to investigate any situation which might constitute a threat to or breach of the peace. Establishing of a permanent international peace force within the UN and depending upon the findings of an experts’ commission, a halt in the production of chemical, biological and radiological weapons and a reduction of the existing stocks or their conversion to peaceful uses... Peaceful uses of chemical biological or radiological weapons?? Do you see how they are perverting the word ‘peace’ and making this policy seem unilaterally good? There is no other way to read this publication. It clearly states that all nations will hand over all their military forces to a Global United Nations Military.


Quoted from: Esoteric Agenda

...



esotericagenda.net/
I remember the good old days, when 90+ year olds in nursing homes lived forever. Darn this pesky virus.

1365 = 1

1.1365 = 1,283,305,580,313,352
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy, PFIZIPFEI, Orangeaid

United Nations Agenda 21 / Agenda 2030 & Sustainable Development 06 Oct 2014 16:16 #10

  • Mario
  • Mario's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Mushroom Kingdom
  • You have the Right NOT to Vote! = for EVIL!
  • Posts: 4648
  • Likes received: 1516

PART 1
Wake-up call
January 21, 2012


“Global sustainability requires the deliberate quest of poverty, reduced resource consumption and set levels of mortality control.”
Professor Maurice King


Birth of an abomination

In simple terms Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is the end of civilization as we know it.

It is the end of private property, the elevation of the collective over the individual. It is the redistribution of America’s wealth to the global elite, it is the end of the Great American Experiment and the Constitution. And, it is the reduction of 85% of the world’s population.

In 1992, twenty years ago this summer, Agenda 21/Sustainable Development was unveiled to the world at the UN’s Earth Summit in Rio. (While Agenda 21 was introduced in June, 1992, it was already installed as public policy in communities across the country as early as 1987.)

In his opening remarks at the ceremonies at the Earth Summit, Maurice Strong stated:
“The concept of national sovereignty has been an immutable, indeed sacred, principle of international relations. It is a principle which will yield only slowly and reluctantly to the new imperatives of global environmental cooperation.

It is simply not feasible for sovereignty to be exercised unilaterally by individual nation states, however powerful. The global community must be assured of environmental security.”
If this is true, then he and his cohorts must be even more against individual sovereignty.

Keep this quote in mind as you read about Agenda 21.

George H.W. Bush was in Rio for the ceremonies and graciously signed on for America so that our Congress did not have to spend the time reviewing the treaty and learning then what dastardly deeds were in store for us - that protecting the environment would be used as the basis for controlling all human activity and redistributing our wealth.

Definitions of Sustainable Development

U.N. definition of Sustainable Development:
“meeting today’s needs without compromising future generations to meet their own needs.”
In actuality, Sustainable Development is not sustainable unless the population actually is reduced by the 85% called for by the globalists.

The true purpose of Sustainable Development and all of its policies is the control of all aspects of human life - economic, social and environmental (see 3 Es of Sustainable Development further below).

Here is how the United Nations described Agenda 21 in one of its own publications in a 1993 article entitled “Agenda 21: The Earth Summit Strategy to Save our Planet:”
“Agenda 21proposes an array of actions which are intended to be implemented by EVERY person on Earth… it calls for specific changes in the activities of ALL people… Effective execution of Agenda 21 will REQUIRE a profound reorientation of ALL humans, unlike anything the world has ever experienced.”
So George H.W. Bush signed the Rio Accord and a year later Clinton established his President’s Council for Sustainable Development which would render the guidelines of Agenda 21 into public policy to be administered by the federal government via all departments.

In doing this, Bush and Clinton set up Agenda 21 as ruling authority, i.e., implementing a U.N. plan to become U.S. policy across the whole nation and into every county and town. And every succeeding president has fully endorsed and implemented Agenda 21 through every department of the federal government.

If one were to research the source of U.S. policy, one would find that much of our policy of the last few decades is the outcome of agreements we have entered into via treaties with the U.N. And that policy has trickled, no gushed, down into every state and into almost every other jurisdiction - county, city, town - in the nation; Sustainable Development is the official policy of our country even though many citizens are yet ignorant of its existence.

And this policy encompasses an entire economic and social agenda.

So what is Sustainable Development?

According to its authors, the objective of Sustainable Development is to integrate economic, social and environmental policies in order to achieve reduced consumption, social equity, and the preservation and restoration of biodiversity (the 3Es of sustainability).

They insist that every societal decision be based on environmental impact, focusing on three components; global land use, global education, and global population control and reduction.

Look at these words, they are part of the new vocabulary:
Free trade, open space, smart growth, smart food, smart buildings, regional planning, walkable, bikeable, foodsheds, viewsheds, consensus, partnerships, preservation, stakeholders, land use, environmental protection, development, diversity, visioning, social justice, heritage, carbon footprints, comprehensive planning, critical thinking, community service, regional planning.
All of these words are part of the Newspeak, the altering of the English language as a tool to promote a global government through a diabolical agenda called Agenda 21.

In fact, the world will be retooled from top to bottom through this agenda and using the new vocabulary.

This is not just policy but a complete restructuring of life as we know it. We not only will be taught how we must live, but where we are allowed to live; taught how to think and what is acceptable thinking; told what job we will be allowed to have; taught how we can worship and what we will be allowed to worship; and we will be brainwashed into believing that the individual must cede all to the collective.

Private property will be a sin that will be eradicated as will be free-market economics which will be replaced by public private partnerships and a planned central economy.

Individualism will be rooted out and social justice will rule the land.

Social justice is described as the right and opportunity of all people,
"to benefit equally from the resources afforded us by society and the environment."
In other words, the redistribution of wealth.

This will be achieved through an organizational structure of land use controls:

  • control of energy and energy production
  • control of transportation
  • control of industry
  • control of food production
  • control of development
  • control of water availability
  • control of population size and growth


  • And all of this will be decreed under the guise of environmental protection.

    The 3 Es of Sustainable Development

    The 3Es of sustainability which make up the Sustainable Development logo consists of three connecting circles labeled,

  • Social Equity
  • Economic Prosperity
  • Ecological Integrity

  • These Es together encompass every aspect of human life.

    Education
    Fifth path to Sustainable Development



    The fifth path to Sustainable Development is education.

    Perhaps I should have made it the first, but one needs to know what the goal is to understand what is happening in our schools - or a better term is retraining facilities. Our children are no longer being educated or taught as we think of education - reading, math, science, history.

    To cut to the chase, let me quote from the introduction to Charlotte Iserbyt’s The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America,
    “Iserbyt has also documented the gradual transformation of our once academically successful education system into one devoted to training children to become compliant human resources to be used by government and industry for their own purposes.

    This is how fascist-socialist societies train their children to become servants of their government masters.

    The successful implementation of this new philosophy of education will spell the end of the American dream of individual freedom and opportunity. The government will plan your life for you, and unless you comply with government restrictions and regulations your ability to pursue a career of your own choice will be severely limited.”
    Our children are being programmed to be good global citizens, to believe in social justice instead of equal justice thus to sublimate themselves to the common good.

    Their values, attitudes and beliefs are being altered to make them viable citizens of a serfdom with earth worshipping as their religion.

    Again from the intro to DDDoA,
    “Americans forget that the present government education system started as a Prussian import in the 1840’s-’50’s. It was a system built on Hegel’s belief that the state was “God” walking on earth.

    The only way to restore educational freedom, and put education back into the hands of parents where it belongs, is to get the federal government, with its coercive policies, out of education.

    The billions of dollars being spent by the federal government to destroy educational freedom must be halted, and that can only be done by getting American legislators to understand that the American people want to remain a free people, in charge of their own lives and the education of their children.”
    You know how the globalists are effecting the so-called education of our children, but how are they effecting the transformation from a Republic (the greatest one the world has ever known) to a Regionalized slave state?

    Through the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) and the American Planning Association (APA) and a myriad of other 'programs' to achieve the same goals (Green Cities, Cool Mayors, Urban Environmental Accords, etc).

    This is a lot to grasp, but you must realize that it is but a drop in the bucket of what is being done under the guise of protecting the environment. As I put it at the beginning of this piece, back in part One, Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is the end of civilization as we know it. It is the end of private property, the elevation of the collective over the individual. It is the redistribution of America’s wealth to the global elite, it is the end of the Great American Experiment and the Constitution.

    And, it is the reduction of 85% of the world’s population.

    There are a lot more aspects that you need to understand. But most importantly, we - every American who loves his or her country and the republic formed by the most incredible forefathers the world has ever known - must fight this with everything we have. There are so many of us and we have reason, right, sound science and the glory of Western Culture and our Judeo-Christian heritage behind us.

    If we truly want to win this fight, we can.

    This is the end of the overview of Agenda 21, the end of Western Civilization or a wake-up call. The next part will cover ICLEI, the APA and the other means of achieving the goals set out in the Agenda.

    More here:
    http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_depopu71.htm 
    >>> PART 2 & PART 3



    @ oiram @
    Last Edit: 06 Oct 2014 16:35 by Mario.
    Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
    User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy

    United Nations Agenda 21 / Agenda 2030 & Sustainable Development 04 Nov 2014 06:48 #11

    • zax
    • zax's Avatar
    • Offline
    • Gold Member
    • Posts: 5812
    • Likes received: 1560
    The Depopulation Agenda For a New World Order Agenda 21

    Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
    User(s) who Liked this post: novum, Lizzy

    United Nations Agenda 21 / Agenda 2030 & Sustainable Development 04 Nov 2014 09:55 #12

    • novum
    • novum's Avatar
    • Offline
    • Platinum Member
    • Posts: 18539
    • Likes received: 8710
    Ann Bressington on Agenda 21, Club of Rome

    I remember the good old days, when 90+ year olds in nursing homes lived forever. Darn this pesky virus.

    1365 = 1

    1.1365 = 1,283,305,580,313,352
    Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
    User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy

    United Nations Agenda 21 / Agenda 2030 & Sustainable Development 04 Nov 2014 11:54 #13

    • Mario
    • Mario's Avatar
    • Offline
    • Mushroom Kingdom
    • You have the Right NOT to Vote! = for EVIL!
    • Posts: 4648
    • Likes received: 1516

    In the last couple of years the omnipresent force known as Agenda 21 is meeting with increasing resistance worldwide.

    With the rise of the alternative media, the flow of decade-long propaganda efforts is finally being hindered. As a result of rocks thrown in the stream - the once steady water flow is now exposing itself at every turn as it’s forced to bend and twist its way forward. Ironically, the UN and its affiliate accomplices have themselves to thank for the counter-effort.

    The internet - as well as some pretty thorough archiving on the part of these transnational bureaucracies - have allowed researchers to withdraw information directly from the lion’s den.

    As a result of this development, we can display a plethora of documents, often written by UN personnel and ideologues, that prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that there is a concerted strategy in place to brainwash (there’s no other name for it) the human population of the planet into accepting Agenda 21 and its inherent depopulation proposals.

    Furthermore, this pool of document has revealed a plan to de-industrialize the west and to use the “green agenda” to do so. In the last few decades Agenda 21 has been UN policy, and all of its subdivisions were commanded to fall in line.

    Throwing rocks however, is not enough to stall the multi-winged creature that is Agenda 21.

    What do free people do when confronted with tyranny designed to target people in their local communities? Methinks nothing short of a war declaration is in order to push back the effort.

    As is custom when declaring war, there first needs to be a listing of the arguments for the war declared.


    Exhibit A
    De-Industrializing the West


    A 1991 policy paper prepared for the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) by Professor Jeffrey Sachs outlines a strategy for the transfer of wealth in name of the environment to be implemented in the course of 35 to 40 years.

    As it turns out, it is a visionary paper describing phase by phase the road to world dictatorship under Agenda 21.

    As the professor states in the paper:
    “To be meaningful, the strategies should cover the time-span of several decades. Thirty-five to forty years seems a good compromise between the need to give enough time to the postulated transformations and the uncertainties brought about by the lengthening of the time-span.”


    In his paper The Next 40 Years - Transition Strategies to the Virtuous Green Path - North/South/East/Global, Sachs accurately describes not only the intended time-span to bring about a global society, but also what steps should be taken to ensure “population stabilization”:
    “In order to stabilize the populations of the South by means other than wars or epidemics, mere campaigning for birth control and distributing of contraceptives has proved fairly inefficient.”
    In the first part of the (in retrospect) bizarrely accurate description of current events as they unfold, Sachs points out redistribution of wealth is the only viable path towards population stabilization and - as he calls it - a “virtuous green world”.

    The professor:
    “The way out from the double bind of poverty and environmental disruption calls for a fairly long period of more economic growth to sustain the transition strategies towards the virtuous green path of what has been called in Stockholm ecodevelopement and has since changed its name in Anglo-Saxon countries to sustainable development.”

    “(…) a fair degree of agreement seems to exist, therefore, about the ideal development path to be followed so long as we do not manage to stabilize the world population and, at the same time, sharply reduce the inequalities prevailing today.”, the professor states.

    “The bolder the steps taken in the near future”, Sachs asserts, “the shorter will be the time span that separates us from a steady state. Radical solutions must address to the roots of the problem and not to its symptoms. Theoretically, the transition could be made shorter by measures of redistribution of assets and income.”
    Sachs points to the political difficulties of such proposals being implemented (because free humanity tends to distrust any national government let alone transnational government to redistribute its well-earned wealth).

    He therefore proposes these measures to be implemented gradually, following a meticulously planned strategy:
    “The pragmatic prospect is one of transition extending itself over several decades.”
    In the second sub-chapter “The Five Dimensions of Ecodevelopment”, professor Sachs sums up the main dimensions of this carefully outlined move to make Agenda 21 a very real future prospect.
    - The first dimension he touches upon is “Social Sustainability”:
    “The aim is to build a civilization of being within greater equity in asset and income distribution, so as to improve substantially the entitlements of the broad masses of population and of reduce the gap in standards of living between the have and the have nots.”
    This of course means, reducing the standards of living in “The North” (U.S., Europe) and upgrading those of the developing nations (“The South and The East”).

    This would have to be realized through what Sachs calls “Economic Sustainability”:
    “made possible by a more efficient allocation and management of resources and a steady flow of public and private investment.”
    - The third dimension described by the professor is “Ecological Sustainability” which, among other things, limits,
    “the consumption of fossil fuels and other easily depletable or environmentally harmful products, substituting them by renewable and/or plentiful and environmentally friendly resources, reducing the volume of pollutants by means of energy and resource conservation and recycling and, last but not least, promoting self-constraint in material consumption on part of the rich countries and of the privileged social strata all over the world.”
    In order to make this happen Sachs stresses the need of,
    “defining the rules for adequate environmental protection, designing the institutional machinery and choosing the mix of economic, legal and administrative instruments necessary for the implementation of environmental policies.”
    - Dimension 4: “Spatial Sustainability”: “directed at achieving a more balanced rural-urban configuration and a better territorial distribution of human settlements and economic activities (…)”.
    - The fifth and last dimension described in the UN policy paper is “Cultural Sustainability”:
    “looking for the endogenous roots of the modernization processes, seeking change within cultural continuity, translating the normative concept of ecodevelopment into a plurality of local, ecosystem-specific, culture-specific and site-specific solutions.”
    But to realize such a dramatic new direction for the world, Sachs once again stresses the importance of incremental implementation.

    A matter of boiling the frog slowly as opposed to throwing the poor animal into a boiling-hot cooking pan:
    “Even if we know where we want to get, the operational question is how do we proceed to put humankind on the virtuous path of genuine development, socially responsible and in harmony with nature. It is submitted that UNCED 92 should give considerable attention to the formulation of transition strategies that could become the central piece of the Agenda 21.
    This is the word - Agenda 21: the UN strategy for redistributing the wealth accumulated by the “North” in order to create a completely “balanced” world society - under auspices of the United Nations of course and the private central banks controlling it.

    This can only come about by destroying the middle-class. A sudden redistribution and industrialization would not do - for the middle-class would undoubtedly rise in defiance against it.

    Therefore, Sachs argues for an incremental and carefully planned dissolution of the middle-class phase by phase:
    “To be meaningful, the strategies should cover the time-span of several decades.

    Thirty-five to forty years seems a good compromise between the need to give enough time to the postulated transformations and the uncertainties brought about by the lengthening of the time-span. The retooling of industries, even in periods of rapid growth, requires ten to twenty years.

    The restructuration and the expansion of the infrastructures requires several decades and this is a crucially important sector from the point of view of environment.”
    Then Sachs plunges into his most shocking statement:
    “However, the single most important reason to consider the transition strategies over a minimum of thirty-five to forty years stems from the non-linearity of these strategies; they should be devised as a succession of changing priorities over time.

    A good illustration is provided by the population transition. In order to stabilize the populations of the South by means other than wars or epidemics, mere campaigning for birth control and distributing of contraceptives has proved fairly inefficient.”
    Sachs argues that,
    “an accelerated program of social and economic development of the rural areas should be the outmost priority in the first phase of a realistic population stabilization scheme.”
    Who or what is to coordinate all this, according to Sachs, and how exactly is the UN to take control?
    “The solutions”, says Sachs, “can vary in terms of their boldness and take the form of global, multilateral or bilateral arrangements.” These arrangements should as far as Sachs is concerned ensure “at least partially the automacity of financial transfers by some form of fiscal mechanisms, be it a small income tax or an array of indirect taxes on goods and services whose production and consumption has significant environmental impacts.”
    Over time, gradually, these taxes should increase:
    “Starting the operation with a one per ten thousand tax and increasing it so as to reach one per thousand in ten to twenty years seems a fairly realistic proposal, the more so that the scheme creates an interesting market for the private enterprises involved in R and D.”
    Reading all this, the question as to what entity should take charge is not difficult to answer. Sachs:
    “In order to generate maximum synergies between the national strategies and global action, the United Nations should create a forum for the periodical discussion and evaluation of these strategies and a research, monitoring and flexible planning facility to put them in a global perspective.(…).

    The forum should have a fair representation of all the main actors involved: governments, parliaments, citizen movements and the business world. Given its importance, it should be lifted from specialized agencies to a central place in the UN system.”
    This almost literally echoes the recent call by a group of scientists for the upcoming UN Earth Summit to create,
    “a Sustainable Development Council within the UN system to integrate social, economic and environmental policy at the global level.”
    The “fair representation” Sachs is talking about is of course only a pretext to get everybody on board.

    As the “Danish Text”, drafted for the Copenhagen conference in late 2009, clearly illustrates, the IMF and World Bank will always have final say in the construction of any international system.

    The other, more sinister element of Agenda 21 is of course the concerted effort on the part of the global elite, through multilateral treaties and regulations, to not only control the populations of the world but to cull them.



    Exhibit C
    Declaring Man The Enemy of the Earth


    As we know, the globalists have decided long ago that the environmental debate is no longer a debate - it has been decreed that the “discussion is over” and everyone should better realize that man is the prime cause for global warming on the planet earth, or of any other natural calamity.

    As long as it serves the double purpose of the elite:
    to abolish nation-states in favor of a great global government, and - as Jeffrey Sachs’ 1991 document reveals - reduce the world population in the same breath.
    The imagined threat of “international terrorism” hardly being sufficient to justify the drastic measures being implemented, another common enemy has presented itself, and what better enemy than the one staring back at you in the mirror.

    As numerous meteorologists and climatologists have testified to in recent years, their participation in the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has been used to back a theory that they themselves did not support. And then there are the thousands of meteorologists of good name and standard, who out of scientific righteousness have stepped forward and presented their facts before the public and scientific community.

    But it is of no concern to the global elite.

    They have for a good long time, spanning the last couple of centuries at least, presided over the politics of eugenics and enforced its diabolical mechanisms with energy, cunning and precision. It is not an idle use of words, when we identify eugenicists as such, for however just and noble its cloaking makes them out to be, this supposed righteousness is merely a grotesque carnival-costume intended to shade its true countenance.

    For an October 1975 ‘International Workshop on Environmental Education’, UN-representative Lars Emmelin writes:
    “The adult education effort seems to me most critical. First, because this element - now outside the formal channels of education - will continue to be the decision makers for the next 15 to 20 years, and it is within this period that the most critical and disruptive decisions will have to be made.

    We cannot afford to focus on youth and let the elders die off before changing our course, which, if time permitted, would be the most efficient way of institutions change.”
    In choosing its course for mass-indoctrination, the 1975 workshop explores various ways in which the mass media can be used to “sensitize” the general public in accepting the UN’s long-term ambitions.

    Under the headline ‘The Media as Environmental Educators’ (page 4) several options are being presented by one of the participants in how the media can best be used:
    “Discussing the role of media as motivators Sandman concludes that: “Four relatively effective kinds of environmental information are: basic ecological principles; prescriptions for environmental action; early warnings of anticipated problems; and assessments of blame for environmental degradation.”’, the report states.
    During an UNESCO-conference in October 1977 held (bizarrely) in Soviet Russia, the Director-General of UNESCO, Amadou-Mahtar M’Bow,
    “paid tribute to the Soviet Union and to the spectacular results achieved since the October Revolution in all areas of economic, social and cultural life, particularly in education and science, and, more especially, in environmental education.”
    You’re reading it right. Here the good Director-General is paying tribute to a then 60-year old regime responsible for murdering many millions of its own people in death camps and deliberate mass-scale starvation-operations.

    Yes, “environmental issues” were very high on the agenda of the USSR, very high indeed.

    After having taken his hat off to his fellow-psychopath, the Director-General plunged into a long and melodious speech on the importance of the “environment-issue” in the decades to come:
    “The objectives and strategies relating to the environment and to development had to be linked and coordinated. (…) It would be the task of education to make people aware of their responsibilities in this connection, but in order to do so it must first be reoriented and based on an ethos of the environment”
    And a little further on he states:
    “Environmental education should also promote attitudes which would encourage individuals to discipline themselves in order not to impair the quality of the environment and to play a positive role in improving it.”
    It is true, under the intentionally vague “environment”-umbrella one can assemble all kinds of calamities and as many solutions to combat them.
    “Work in this program area”, the report continues, “will be intensified “in the line of the conference’s recommendations and move into a more operational phase.

    This means, among other activities, “making aid from UNESCO available to member states (of the UN) which would like to launch pilot projects”; considering a “bank” of experts on environmental education; augmenting “work in the exchange of experience, in training and in encouraging the production of teaching materials”; and strengthening the Secretariat and UNESCO’s infrastructure in general for the increased promotion of environmental education..”’
    In the meeting, the chairman of the conference stressed that no means must or will be shunned in the coming propaganda war against the people:
    “Some countries have also taken an interest, as part of in-service training activities, in the environmental education of various social and occupational categories of the population, such as factory workers, farmers, civil servants, etc.

    Marked progress has been made in the preparation of audio-visual and printed teaching materials concerning the environment, and the mass media are being increasingly used for sensitizing and informing broad sectors of the public about the environment.”
    In a follow-up conference more than ten years later (this time in Moscow) the Secretary-General of UNESCO, Federico Mayor, discusses “three levels of global education” in regards to the environment.
    The first, he states, is the “moral imperative” to reach as many people as humanly possible.
    The second level is “to harness school systems, non-formal learning and informal education to teach and learn about the global issues that shape and threaten the quality of our lives.”
    Arriving at the third and last level of global indoctrination, Mayor states:
    “The third level concerns the means at our disposal to project a global reach for education through both simple and highly advanced existing technologies. (…) the daily newspaper and radio have a crucial role to play in building bridges to the wider world. We must promote these media, defend and expand their freedom and appeal to their professionals at all levels to work with us for global education.”
    We can hardly accuse the globalists of keeping their plans in the dark. At every possible UN event or brainstorm conference, they openly brag about their plans for the world in quite explicit ways.

    The Secretary-General continues about the steps that have to be taken in order to build a “new global perception”:
    “Our first initiative would be to create a worldwide expert panel of scientists and educators to plan a global education curriculum of practical value and planetary scope.”
    The Secretary-General forgets to mention here that just such a panel was created two years earlier by the very organization he presided over.
    “Second, putting environmental education at the center of all curricula from kindergarten to higher studies and training the teachers and the administrators who can carry the massage into all schools.(..)

    Third, promoting a global civic education by devising teaching methods and materials that emphasize the ethics of worldwide community living.(…)

    Fourth, teaching the children of the wealthier countries about the conditions of their brothers and sisters in the developing world (…)

    Fifth, working with the mass media and telecommunication enterprises to produce and broadcast audio-visual packages that introduce audiences, particularly children and young people, to the great teachers of this world at al levels and in all cultures (…).”

    “And finally”, the Secretary-General concludes, “let me make a very immediate and concrete proposal: building on the broadcast of this forum scheduled for tomorrow (…), to create global television learning networks on the issues of the human agenda for the next century. This would be an experiment in informal global education at its best.”
    Under the term ‘Information Repackaging’, the UN has published several manuals on this subject, teaching their cronies how to most effectively influence public opinion.

    In a 1986 Manual for Repackaging of Information on Population Education, the UNESCO proposes “strategies for integrating population education into different subject areas” - one of these being playing into fears on the part of the population in regards to the subject of their home environment family:
    “For instance, the effectiveness of fear appeals in changing attitudes and behavior, such as the adverse effects of non - or limited access to education and housing facilities with more than two children, depends on the credibility of the source of information and the extent of general/public support to the message conveyed by a particular piece of information.

    Fear appeals directed to the welfare of people valued by the receiver of information (e.g. family members, close friends) are also effective.”
    On page 37 of the manual, under the header “Selective Dissemination of Information (SDI)”, the strategy is further elaborated upon:
    “One SDI package, for instance, focuses on the integration of population education into environmental education. The package contains materials which will help users understand the relationship between man and the environment, as well as provide insights and actual data on how to plan, teach and implement practical environment/population activities for everyday life.”
    As we know, the above mentioned gadgets and gimmicks are being incrementally used in the mass media as the climate change propaganda machine is working overtime.

    Using the mass media to prepare the population for globalist supreme rule is not only an ambitious plan - it reveals the deceitful spirit behind the provided information, rivaling the work of Joseph Goebbels and his Department of Propaganda.

    A March 2009 policy brief by the United Nations Population Division reveals that the long-term plan for worldwide population reduction is not going fast enough according to the social engineers, not by a long shot.

    Under the desperate headline “What would it take to accelerate fertility decline in the least developed countries?” this particular policy brief gives an overview of the progress made by developing countries in regards to the globalists set goal of reducing population and proposes several ways of speeding up the death.

    Richly draped with graphic illustrations on the state of global population and the progress made by the UN to bring back fertility to “acceptable” levels, the policy brief advises an increased effort on the part of governments to commit to a strict family planning - policy and other measures designed to bring a halt to life.
    “The reduction of fertility could be accelerated if effective measures were taken to satisfy the existing unmet need for family planning.”
    After these recommendations, the authors plunge into a long, wailing lament about the slow progress of the desired culling of the population.

    They also blame a lack of commitment of the governments concerned and, as expected, they stress the need for a global intervention in order to avoid certain destruction.

    This recent policy brief was just one out of many in regards to the long-term plan by the elite to significantly bring down the numbers of the existing earth population.

    From the moment the Rockefeller funded family planning-machine was widely kicked off in the 1960s and 70s, numerous meetings have been held in the last couple of decades where various strategies were discussed to implement population-reduction on as large a scale as possible.

    The strategies in question were especially directed towards the third world as the globalists had virtual carte blanche in the impoverished developing countries. The famous 1994 population conference in Cairo, held in the wake of Agenda 21′s formal kick-off, outlined some of the proposed strategies to be implemented.

    Then Secretary-General of the UN, Boutros Boutros-Ghali in his opening statement on the International Conference on Population and Development, stated that:
    “I am not exaggerating when I say that not only does the future of the human society depend on this Conference but also the efficacy of the economic order of the planet on which we live.”
    During a follow-up-meeting held in New York on December 1994, the United Nations’ participants came up with some practical solutions to the “population problem” - one of which is the integration of population issues with matters of “environment” and “human development”:
    “Several priority areas were identified that needed immediate action by the participants. These included creation of awareness of the interrelationships between environment, population and development; advocacy; education; training; population management; gender concerns; monitoring and evaluation; and information dissemination and networking.”
    Under the headline “Youth NGOs Agree to Integrate Environment and Population Issues in their Activities” were mentioned the following activities to “guide” the young into the right mindset by, again, mixing in environmental issues with population issues:
    “Among the current issues identified by the Working Group as requiring priority attention were the problems dealing with population, environment and sustainable development.

    Hence, a Working Group Meeting of the Regional Consultation of Youth NGOs in Asia and the Pacific was held from 19-21 April 1995 at the UNESCO PROAP to discuss and shape a plan of action integrating issues on environment, population and development for consideration by the youth NGOs. (…)

    To help them develop a relevant plan of action, the participants were exposed and sensitized to the current policies and programs adopted by FAO, UNEP, UNFPA, and UNESCO in the areas of population, environment and development.”
    http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_depopu82.htm 


    @ oiram @
    Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

    United Nations Agenda 21 / Agenda 2030 & Sustainable Development 19 Feb 2015 07:01 #14

    • zax
    • zax's Avatar
    • Offline
    • Gold Member
    • Posts: 5812
    • Likes received: 1560
    The dark underbelly of sustainable development: Agenda 21
    (NaturalNews) Sustainable development has been the catchphrase of the environmental movement for over 20 years and rarely are underlying motives questioned. After all, a majority of people want a healthy future, free of pollutants and global warming where the earth is protected for ourselves and subsequent generations. There is a catch, however. The underpinnings of sustainable development are rooted in Agenda 21, a body of regulations inspired by the United Nations (UN) "Earth Summit" conference in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil. At first glance, the agenda looks beneficial and harmless -- except for the fact that it sets forth a policy which strips individuals of freedom and controls private land unconstitutionally.


    The birth of sustainable development
    The United Nations conference on environment and development, often referred to as the "Earth Summit," was held in 1992 to advance sustainable development throughout the world. Agenda 21 was born out of the summit as an international standard of policy. On the surface, the agenda appears favorable -- helping to save humans, wildlife and the environment from destruction through building guidelines and proper management of natural resources. But dig a bit deeper and it will soon become apparent Agenda 21 is yet another vehicle of control.


    Code officials knocking
    Imagine officials representing the International Code Council (ICC) having access to the keys for your home and could enter the property at any time to check for code 'violations.' According to Red State, the Cedar Falls City Council in Iowa approved an ordinance that will require:

    "Mandatory lock boxes [outside of] all commercial property including apartment buildings and Triplexes. Inside the box you have to provide keys to all entrances to the property including keys to individual apartments."

    It may seem like cities such as Cedar Falls are acting locally in the best interest of their community's safety, but in reality the lock box legislation is based on international code and regulation which has ties to Agenda 21. If an ICC official deems a space to be in violation of Agenda 21 rules, property can be searched (easily with the provided key), heavily fined or seized at their discretion without due process. If Agenda 21 comes to fruition, private land will be a luxury of the past and citizens will be told how they will live and where as dictated by UN guidelines.


    Global rule and public lands
    The UN publication, "Earth Summit: Agenda 21," outlines every area of regulation including industry, science and technology, farming, the role of children, youth and women in sustainability, water, poverty along with demographic dynamics and human settlement development. Concerned citizens believe this framework has nothing to do with environmentalism and everything to do with control of a nation's resources. Massive swathes of 'public land' will be under the command of the government who are then controlled by the policy of the UN. Many are troubled that the agenda is created by a global organization yet spoon-fed to the American public under the auspice of "local" government. If this doesn't sound alarming enough, have a look at the "Biodiversity Map" of the United States. The legend indicates the small areas where citizens would be allowed to live under the rules of the agenda.

    Seeing that Americans have a long history of pioneering spirit and independence, it might be worthwhile to consider the ramifications of Agenda 21. Does the American public truly desire regulation by a behemoth world organization or would citizens rather find solutions within the freedom of authentic, local innovation and small government?


    Learn more: www.naturalnews.com/039729_Agenda_21_sustainable_development_motives.html#ixzz3SAis5pDI
    Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
    User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy

    United Nations Agenda 21 / Agenda 2030 & Sustainable Development 23 Feb 2015 03:51 #15

    • zax
    • zax's Avatar
    • Offline
    • Gold Member
    • Posts: 5812
    • Likes received: 1560
    Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
    User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy

    United Nations Agenda 21 / Agenda 2030 & Sustainable Development 23 Feb 2015 04:40 #16

    • zax
    • zax's Avatar
    • Offline
    • Gold Member
    • Posts: 5812
    • Likes received: 1560
    novum wrote
    In 1970 just three years after the publication of the Iron Mountain Report, which calls for , if we are going to create a world government we can no longer use war as a mechanism to cause fear amongst populations and therefore allow us to control the behavior of populations through fear. And they settled on, in 1967, in their publication called the Iron Mountain Report, the Environmental Holocaust. In 1970, 3 years after that publication the Council of Foreign Relations ( www.cfr.org/ / www.chathamhouse.org/ ) began to publish a series of articles describing ecological holocaust that was facing the world and in this particular issue, the first issue done by George Keenan, to prevent a world disaster it sums up in three points that the eco-crisis is a global threat so great that it endangers all of life on earth. Aurelio Peccei who actually created the Club of Rome ( www.clubofrome.org/ ), and is in the inner, inner circle of the global elitists in 1991 stated that while searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming and the like would fit the bill. All of these dangers are caused by human intervention. The real enemy then is humanity itself ( www.amazon.com/The-First-Global-Revoluti...ouncil/dp/0679738258 The book itself was printed in 1991 but the sentence in question is referring to something that occurred ~20+ years prior).
    Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
    User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy

    United Nations Agenda 21 / Agenda 2030 & Sustainable Development 24 Feb 2015 05:06 #17

    • zax
    • zax's Avatar
    • Offline
    • Gold Member
    • Posts: 5812
    • Likes received: 1560
    Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

    United Nations Agenda 21 / Agenda 2030 & Sustainable Development 24 Feb 2015 05:21 #18

    • zax
    • zax's Avatar
    • Offline
    • Gold Member
    • Posts: 5812
    • Likes received: 1560
    Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
    User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy

    United Nations Agenda 21 / Agenda 2030 & Sustainable Development 27 Feb 2015 06:38 #19

    • zax
    • zax's Avatar
    • Offline
    • Gold Member
    • Posts: 5812
    • Likes received: 1560
    VICTORY: Citizens Stand up to Agenda 21 in Alaska
    The average planning and zoning meeting consists of the planning and zoning commissioners, a room, and very little else. They are often dry meetings dealing with rules and regulations for business and home licensing, property lines, and nuisance ordinances.

    So when the Borough of Kodiak, AK (Pop. 13,600) chose to attempt to entirely revamp the zoning code and place greater restrictions on property owners, including a $1,000 fine per violation, they expected there to be little opposition, and little knowledge of the change.

    Instead, the Solutions Institute assisted local resident Jamie Fagan, and he along with a team of people rallied over 300 residents to attend the meeting.

    Even though many residents could not attend due to flooded roads and driving rain, there were over 69 speeches, nearly all in opposition to the new code, totaling over 4 hours of testimony against it.

    The zoning code in question, drafted by Bob Pederson, enforces many of the suggestions of the United Nations’ 1992 “Agenda 21” treaty, including making it easier for local officials to seize private property.

    Jamie was excited to have some assistance defending his home:


    I can’t thank the Solutions Institute enough. From helping us to choose an appropriate name for our organization to setting up Facebook groups, editing videos, to helping in ways that one might describe as “unorthodox” but are breathtakingly effective, it really is a joy to work with these guys and there is no doubt in my mind that our group would not have been nearly as effective without their help.

    Though the code has not been defeated yet, Jamie has no doubt that with the amount of people who came out to try and stop it, it is only a matter of time before the new code is scrapped.

    While SI does not take a position on the issue, we were pleased to help get more citizens involved in their local governance, and happy to help ensure that the new zoning regulations faced the public debate and transparency that are the hallmarks of a free society.

    The Solutions Institute is a collection of activists and professionals from across the political spectrum, and we are always looking for new projects. Submit yours here: solutions-institute.org/get-help/
    www.dcclothesline.com/2015/01/25/victory-citizens-stand-agenda-21-alaska/
    Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

    United Nations Agenda 21 / Agenda 2030 & Sustainable Development 02 Mar 2015 02:34 #20

    • zax
    • zax's Avatar
    • Offline
    • Gold Member
    • Posts: 5812
    • Likes received: 1560
    Agenda 21 is touted for its seemingly noble and vague goal of "sustainable development," i.e. creating a sustainable global economy that will allow for infinite and exponentil economic growth while conserving diminishing finite resources such as oil, gas, potassium (fertilizer) and water. Nothing is ever what it first appears to be, still less what it is touted as when first presented by governments and organizations that have the ambition of forming a global government of unelected bureaucrats and the 'sustainable development' proposed in Agenda 21 (an agenda for the twenty first century)is really an encrypted way of saying a plan for an insidious movement toward global governance and population control.

    www.greenteethmm.com/agenda21.shtml
    Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

    Related topics

    Topic subjectRelevanceDate of latest post
    TRANSFORMING OUR WORLD: THE 2030 AGENDA FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT32.67Tuesday, 08 September 2015
    United Nations ONE WORLD RELIGION11.6Monday, 30 March 2015
    United Nations to control the internet from October 2016?11.35Monday, 05 December 2016
    UN Replacement Migration ST/ESA/SER.A/206 United Nations Population Division11.35Thursday, 16 March 2017
    Real life Terminator: United Nations Debate Combat Robots On The Battlefield11Wednesday, 05 June 2013
    Agenda 202010.99Saturday, 28 December 2019
    Veganism, agenda 21 and the NWO10.99Tuesday, 21 January 2020
    The GMO Agenda (and how to combat it)10.99Sunday, 02 August 2020
    The Malthusian Agenda10.99Sunday, 31 May 2015
    BBC Multicultural Agenda10.99Tuesday, 23 June 2020
    • Page:
    • 1
    • 2
    Moderators: novum, rodin, Flare
    Powered by Kunena Forum

    Annual Server Target

    Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it. Secure transactions via paypal.
    This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2020 - May 2021, in USD.
    $ 340 - Target
    ( £ 255 GBP )
    donation thermometer
    donation thermometer
    $ 70 - Raised
    ( £ 53 GBP )
    donation thermometer
    21%
    Most Recent Donation $50 USD
    28th August 2020

    No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.