Your donations are appreciated and help keep this site running. Even the smallest amount helps.
Thankyou

 
PROMOTE YOUR SITE
HERE
Only $3 USD/month
TRUTHSPOON.COM
The man they can't recruit!
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: Democracy Alliance - Inside the vast liberal conspiracy

Democracy Alliance - Inside the vast liberal conspiracy 15 Mar 2019 19:29 #1

  • Rocco
  • Rocco's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Gold Member
  • Turn or Burn!
  • Posts: 6909
  • Likes received: 1486
Democracy Alliance - Inside the vast liberal conspiracy
www.politico.com/story/2014/06/inside-the-vast-liberal-conspiracy-108171


Picture this: millionaires and billionaires gathering under tight security in fancy hotels with powerful politicians and operatives to plot how their network of secret-money groups can engineer a permanent realignment of American politics.

Only, it’s not the Koch brothers. It’s the liberal Democracy Alliance.

The 21 groups at the core of the Democracy Alliance’s portfolio intend to spend $374 million during the midterm election cycle — including nearly $200 million this year — to boost liberal candidates and causes in 2014 and beyond, according to internal documents obtained by POLITICO.

While growing sums of that cash are being spent vilifying the billionaire conservative industrialists Charles and David Koch over their own network’s political spending, the documents reveal the extent to which the Democracy Alliance network mirrors the Kochs’ — and is obsessed with it.

“Conservatives, particularly the Koch Brothers, are playing for keeps with an even more pronounced financial advantages than in recent election cycles,” reads the introduction to a 62-page briefing book provided to donors ahead of April’s annual spring meeting of the DA, as the club is known, at Chicago’s tony Ritz-Carlton hotel.

The briefing book reveals a sort of DA-funded extra-party political machine that includes sophisticated voter databases and plans to mobilize pivotal Democratic voting blocs, air ads boosting Democratic candidates, while also — perhaps ironically — working to reduce the influence of money in politics.

Democracy Alliance officials did not dispute the authenticity of the document but declined to comment on it.

It makes public for the first time details of the complete organizational flowchart of the big-money left, including up-to-date budget figures and forecasts, program goals and performance assessments for the 21 core DA groups, including the Center for American Progress, Media Matters, America Votes and the Obama-linked Organizing for Action.

It also includes a “Progressive Infrastructure Map,” with 172 other groups to which the DA recommends that its rich liberal members — including billionaire financier (((George Soros))) and Houston trial lawyers Amber and Steve Mostyn — donate.

Private political networks like those backed by the DA and the Koch operation have become increasingly prominent in American politics. Over the past seven years, federal court decisions including the Supreme Court’s seminal 2010 Citizens United ruling have expanded megacheck spending in elections. Money and control have increasingly migrated from political parties and candidates’ campaigns, which still must abide by contribution limits and disclosure requirements, to outside groups like those in the DA that can accept unlimited — and mostly anonymous — contributions.

That heightened influence has brought increased criticism of donors, particularly directed at the Kochs by liberals — including multiple groups on the Democracy Alliance’s map. But the prospect of such scrutiny being directed back at the DA was enough of a concern that the group distributed a memo to board members ahead of its Chicago meeting including suggested responses to questions about the club’s secretive rules and closed-press policy, as well as photos of reporters who it was feared might crash the Ritz shindig.

“The truth is political strategists and funders frequently gather to discuss their plans without inviting reporters to listen in,” said DA spokeswoman Stephanie Mueller. “The Democracy Alliance was organized to provide a forum for people with a shared set of principles to coordinate their resources more efficiently and effectively to achieve their common goals – it doesn’t represent a single industry or family, and doesn’t give money directly to organizations.”

But when it comes to sheer volume of cash, the DA isn’t in the same league as the Koch network. While the DA takes credit for steering more than $500 million in donations to recommended groups since its creation in 2005, the Koch network spent more than $400 million in 2012 alone.

Koch network donors are expected to provide almost every penny of the Koch operation’s $290 million 2014 spending goal. By contrast, DA donors — or “partners,” in the club’s parlance — are projected to provide a maximum of $39 million toward the $200 million 2014 spending goal of the 21 core DA groups, according to the briefing booklet. That means most of the cash raised by DA-linked groups actually comes from donors, institutions or revenue streams outside the DA’s cloistered ranks. Another difference: While DA partners are required to donate at least $200,000 a year to recommended groups, they ultimately decide to which group their money goes. The Koch network, on the other hand, collects contributions in the nonprofit political hub Freedom Partners Chamber of Commerce, which then distributes the cash mostly as it sees fit to groups in the network.

But the DA document distributed in Chicago does call into question some of the plaintiff woe-is-us rhetoric bandied about by Democrats griping about the Koch brothers’ sophisticated efforts to use their checkbooks to manipulate American democracy.

Even though the DA’s cash projections pale in comparison to the Koch network, which is in a financial class by itself and rivals the official parties’ spending, they exceed those of most other outside spending operations on the right and left. And, perhaps more significantly, the briefing highlights what liberals believe is superior coordination between its deep-pocketed labor unions, outside groups and even the administration of President Barack Obama that has allowed their side to spend its big money more efficiently than conservatives.

An assessment of the Center for American Progress and its sister group the Center for American Progress Action Fund, which are projected to receive as much as $5.5 million from DA members this year, boasts of its work on gun control with the administration and other deep-pocketed groups in the DA’s infrastructure map.
When you are dead, you don't know that you are dead. It is difficult only for the others. It is the same when you are Stupid
Last Edit: 15 Mar 2019 19:30 by Rocco.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Here's the Democracy Alliance's 'Resistance Map' 15 Mar 2019 19:32 #2

  • Rocco
  • Rocco's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Gold Member
  • Turn or Burn!
  • Posts: 6909
  • Likes received: 1486
Here's the Democracy Alliance's 'Resistance Map'

The Democracy Alliance's 'resistance map' includes a mix of new and older groups to which the club is recommending its members donate to oppose the Trump administration.

When you are dead, you don't know that you are dead. It is difficult only for the others. It is the same when you are Stupid
Last Edit: 15 Mar 2019 19:38 by Rocco.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Democracy Alliance - Inside the vast liberal conspiracy 15 Mar 2019 19:40 #3

  • Rocco
  • Rocco's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Gold Member
  • Turn or Burn!
  • Posts: 6909
  • Likes received: 1486
Democracy Alliance: Soros Billionaires Club for Revolution
www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/25200-democracy-alliance-soros-billionaires-club-for-revolution
Even as Democrats publicly and loudly decry corporatist political “dark money,” billionaire Democrats and other donors funnel hundreds of millions to radical and violent causes.
Barely a week had passed after Donald Trump’s historic upset in the November 8 presidential election, but some of the world’s richest individuals were already launching a counteroffensive. George Soros and his fellow deep-pocket funders of the Democratic Party and left-wing causes gathered with a lineup of party activists and luminaries from Hollywood, K Street, and Wall Street for a three-day “investment conference” (November 15-17) at the luxurious Mandarin Oriental Hotel in Washington, D.C. The conference was entitled “2016-2018-2020: Seizing Opportunity & Building Power.” These are folks who know a thing or two about seizing power — political, economic, and social. They are the “partners” of the Democracy Alliance, an elite invitation-only club of uber-rich donors who are credited with dumping hundreds of millions of dollars into political campaigns and radical movements in recent years.

While much of what Soros and the Democracy Alliance donors are doing is perfectly legal, a considerable portion of their cash is sluiced into a network of “pass through” foundations and organizations that fund illegal — and even violent — activities. The WikiLeaks e-mails and the undercover video “interviews” by Project Veritas, featuring boastful admissions of criminal acts by Bob Creamer, Scott Foval, Cesar Vargas, Zulema Rodriguez, and Aaron Black, have confirmed the worst concerns of critics regarding “dark money” flowing through the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Hillary Clinton campaign.

In one video, Foval actually connects the dots, noting that the illegal funding goes through the Clinton campaign to the DNC, to Creamer’s group and on to Foval, who then, says Foval, “executes the sh*t on the ground.” Bob Creamer, a top Democratic operative, tells the hidden camera that Clinton’s campaign “is fully in it.... Hillary knows through the chain of command what’s going on.” New York lawyer Cesar Vargas, a key DNC operative helping to get illegal aliens into the voting stream, tells Project Veritas: “Yeah, and for me I totally get it, this is illegal; this is something that can be done.” Clinton campaign staff member Zulema Rod­riguez is recorded on video taking credit for organizing the March 2016 anti-Trump riots in Chicago that resulted in police officers being injured and caused Trump to cancel his rally.

A thorough congressional investigation of these criminal activities and the dark money channels that fund them is absolutely essential if our elections are to have continued relevance and our constitutional Republic is to survive.

Trump’s victory has stoked the Left’s fears and fervor like no other event. An entry on the agenda for the closed Democracy Alliance (DA) meeting at the Mandarin described President-elect Trump’s plan for America as “a terrifying assault on President Obama’s achievements — and our progressive vision for an equitable and just nation.”

Gara LaMarche, the president of DA, told the mega-donors gathered at the Mandarin for a pre-conference welcome dinner that their stunning loss on November 8 showed the need for some serious reassessment. The press was not invited to the event, but according to prepared remarks he provided to Politico, he said, “You don’t lose an election you were supposed to win, with so much at stake, without making some big mistakes, in assumptions, strategy and tactics.”

A big part of the DA strategy over the next four years will be to focus on congressional races, as well as putting their people into office in state and local races. An e-mail LaMarche sent to DA partners before the event said they would be assessing “what steps we will take together to resist the assaults that are coming and take back power, beginning in the states in 2017 and 2018.”

One of the vehicles for pressing that agenda will be the State Innovation Exchange, headed by Nick Rathod, a community organizer, former special assistant to President Obama, former staffer at the Soros-Clinton-Podesta Center for American Progress, and former leader in Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s national gun-control campaign. A big part of the plan is to boost Democrats into state legislatures in time to be able to control redistricting efforts after the 2020 census. Another likely part is to expand DA donor giving to local political campaigns, such as the recently successful defeat of combative Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio (which cost Soros a mere $2 million!). Soros’ “Safety & Justice” PACs have also funneled more than $3 million into seven local district attorney races in six states. “Criminal justice reform” groups supported by Soros and DA are targeting many more similar races around the country.

Speakers, presenters, and panelists at the DA soirée included such standard fixtures of the establishment Left as Representative Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Representative Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), Gara LaMarche, and Van Jones, as well as leaders of the AFL-CIO, Service Employees International Union (SEIU), American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), and other labor unions. But the A-List of attendees, around 100 DA “Partners,” are those who can write the big checks, and have been known for giving millions to fund radical “progressive” causes. Although a complete list of this year’s attendees has not been made available, the DA partners include such financial heavyweights as Donald Sussman, Peter Lewis, Herb and Marian Sandler, Tom Steyer, Norman Lear, Rob McKay, Amy Goldman, Philip Munger, Adam Abram — and, of course, the Soros family (George and sons Jonathan and Alex). Not surprisingly, a number of the activist foundations were also listed on the DA agenda as “hosts”: Rockefeller Family Fund, Surdna Foundation, Solidago Foundation, Tides Foundation, JK Irwin Foundation, Arca Foundation, and Wyss Foundation.

Besides George Soros himself, listed presenters at the DA’s 2016 Mandarin confab included Center for Community Change President Deepak Bhargava; Demos President Heather McGhee; Freedom to Marry founder Evan Wolfson, “the architect of the movement that led to a nationwide victory at the U.S. Supreme Court in 2015 affirming marriage rights for gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgendered Americans”; Media Matters for America founder David Brock; and National Center for Transgender Equality executive director Mara Keisling.

Between the time of its founding in 2005 and the 2014 election cycle, Democracy Alliance reportedly funneled $500 million into “progressive” left-wing organizations. “While the Democracy Alliance requires that its members pay $30,000 in yearly dues, the group itself does not collect and distribute funds to other organizations,” explains Ballotpedia. “Instead, according to the Washington Post, the alliance occupies a unique position as an ‘accreditation agency for political advocacy groups,’” Ballotpedia continues. “DA staff members advise partners by closely monitoring the work and finances of approved organizations, allowing some of the country’s wealthiest progressive donors to coordinate their giving and make long-term, sustained investments in political infrastructure. The Democracy Alliance derives its influence from this accreditation process, as a number of major political donors become more or less off-limits for groups that do not receive the DA stamp of approval.”

DA Stamp of Approval

So which groups have passed the “accreditation process” and won access to the coveted DA gravy train? Ballotpedia reports that a confidential document from 2015 recovered by Politico included a list of 39 recommended organizations that form the Democracy Alliance’s “core portfolio.” A confidential report to DA partners in 2014 listed 172 organizations that form the DA’s “Progressive Infrastructure Map.” These are some of the organizations favored by the DA’s mega-donors: 350.org, Alliance for Justice, American Bridge 21st Century, Brennan Center for Justice, Center for American Progress, Center for Community Change, ColorOfChange.org, Demos, Planned Parenthood, People for the American Way, Rebuild the Dream, Priorities USA Action, Progressive Campaign Change Committee, Progressive Congress, Progressive Majority, Progressive States Network, ProgressNow, Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), Working America, Working Families Party, and many, many more.

Let’s examine just a few of these groups:

350.org — Founded by radical environmentalist and global-warming ultra-alarmist Bill McKibben, 350.org is funded by DA partners, as well as the Soros, Rockefeller, and Ford Foundations, and the Global Greengrants Fund. According to McKibben’s “terrifying new math,” we must cut our energy from fossil fuels to “zero” — immediately — to avoid “catastrophic warming.”

Blue Green Alliance (BGA) — Founded to unite “America’s largest labor unions and its most influential environmental organizations,” BGA has partnered with Al Gore’s Alliance for Climate Protection and advanced the “greening” of school curricula throughout the country.

ColorOfChange.org (COC) — Co-founded by CNN commentator Van Jones, a “former” communist devotee of mass-murderer Mao Tse-tung, and briefly President Obama’s green jobs czar, COC is one of many groups that exist largely to smear political conservatives with false charges of racism. The Soros network is especially fond of Comrade Jones, showering his various efforts, such as the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights, Green for All, and Rebuild the Dream, with millions of dollars.

The Nation magazine — The oldest continuously published weekly magazine in the United States, The Nation (founded 1865) is also one of the most reliably “progressive,” if one understands that term to mean pro-socialist, pro-communist, anti-capitalist, and militantly anti-anti-communist. During the 20th century, there were few (if any) communist regimes that The Nation’s extreme-left writers and editors could fail to praise, let alone condemn. And there have been few leftist causes — abortion, population control, gun control, LGBTQ rights, climate change, open borders, atheism, etc. — they have failed to champion.

Mother Jones magazine — Named for militant socialist labor organizer Mary Harris “Mother” Jones (1837 - 1930), this radical-left magazine is a relative newcomer compared to The Nation. Launched in 1976 by the Foundation for National Progress, a spin-off group of the pro-Castro, pro-Soviet Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), Mother Jones stalwartly follows the “progressive” line, which usually means being virulently anti-American, anti-Christian, and anti-capitalist. Among the current writers at the magazine are Al Gore, former president of the violent Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) Todd Gitlin, Communist China propagandist Orville Schell, former State Department official and Carnegie Endowment president Morton Abramowitz, and veteran IPS Marxists Robert Borosage and Phyllis Bennis.

Demos — Posturing as a progressive think tank, this 501(c)(3) nonprofit has been involved in many fights over voter registration, income inequality, minimum wage, campaign finance reform, and global governance. It is one of the many groups funded by DA partners where hard-left radicals and establishment globalists collaborate to undermine American sovereignty and independence. Demos cofounder and current board chair is Amelia Warren Tyagi, the daughter of Senator Elizabeth Warren. Former Demos President (and current trustee emeritus) Miles Rapoport was a leader of the Students for a Democratic Society in the 1960s. Rapoport is a veteran collaborator with the hardcore Marxists of the Institute for Policy Studies and the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA). Also sitting on the Demos board of trustees are Van Jones and Stephen Heintz, president of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund.

Heintz is particularly noteworthy, since he is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the dominant globalist organization that has operated as the “power behind the throne” in America for much of the past century. Over at The Nation, editor/publisher Katrina vanden Heuvel is a CFR member, as have been a number of its writers over the years. Current CFR-member writers include Representative Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) and Hendrick Hertzberg. At Mother Jones, prominent CFR members include Orville Schell, Morton Abramowitz, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and Daniel Yankelovich.

Top-down/Bottom-up Control

The CFR connection is crucial to understanding the dynamic of simultaneous “pressure from above and below” that has been responsible for moving the political/social dials continually leftward over the past decades, so that yesterday’s left is today’s center. The CFR globalists in the suites provide the cash, direction, and media support for the radical activists in the streets who create the appearance of popular support for more centralization of power. It is a squeeze play, in which the faux populists are merely paid agents and rent-a-mob dupes delivering more and more control to the crony “capitalists” they claim to detest and oppose.

George Soros is a leading member and funder of the Council on Foreign Relations. His son Jonathan Soros is also a member, as are key individuals who are (or have been) operatives in the Open Society Foundations and other Soros-funded organizations. Aryeh Neier, who served as president of the OSF for nearly a decade, from its founding in 1993 to 2012, is also a CFR member. (Incidentally, and worthy of note, Neier was one of the ’60s radicals who founded the riotous, Marxist SDS. He subsequently went on to lead the ACLU, which, like the SDS, invokes “democracy” while doing everything possible to undermine our constitutional Republic.) Democracy Alliance itself is run by CFR member Gara LaMarche. Like Aryeh Neier, LaMarche was also a professional rabble-rouser/revolutionary for the ACLU before being promoted to director of U.S. programs for the Open Society Foundations. He then got bumped up to CEO of the Atlantic Philanthropies, where he oversaw the foundation’s grant-making avalanche of funds to “social justice” activists, prior to taking over the top post at DA.

The CFR connection is also crucial to understanding George Soros’ position in the power elite matrix. Because of his enormous wealth, activism, and narcissistic craving of the limelight, Soros has become the bogeyman nonpareil for conservatives. However, the mogul’s real power stems from his membership in the elite organizations promoting a “new world order” (i.e., world government), such as the CFR, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group, and International Crisis Group.

It is CFR globalists who always shield the Soros types from the death rays of genuine public scrutiny: “Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain”; “These are not the droids you’re looking for.” Wielding their power in the media, as well as their influence in political, business, and financial spheres, the CFR elites killed the congressional investigations in the 1950s that were threatening to expose the funding of socialist and communist subversion by the big tax-exempt foundations. They will run out the same playbook once more when (and if) official efforts are again launched to expose the schemes of Soros, Democracy Alliance, and other new world order mega-donors. If they succeed in quashing these efforts, it is unlikely we will ever get another chance. That is why it is absolutely necessary for citizens to press their senators and representatives to investigate — and, where appropriate, for state attorneys general to prosecute — funders of chaos and bring them to justice.
When you are dead, you don't know that you are dead. It is difficult only for the others. It is the same when you are Stupid
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
Moderators: novum, rodin, Flare
Powered by Kunena Forum

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it. Secure transactions via paypal.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2018 - May 2019, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 260 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 370 - Raised
( £ 284 GBP )
donation thermometer
109%
Updated
2nd April 2019

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.