Your donations are appreciated and help keep this site running. Even the smallest amount helps.
Thankyou

 
PROMOTE YOUR SITE
HERE
Only $3 USD/month
TRUTHSPOON.COM
The man they can't recruit!
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: The Holocaust

The Holocaust 19 Sep 2018 21:14 #3261

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Online
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 13876
  • Likes received: 5479
Voltaire wrote:
:larf:
So we have come together on this day to prove symbolically that we are more than a collection of individuals striving one against another, that none of us is too proud, none of us too high, none is too rich, and none too poor, to stand together before the face of the Lord and of the world in this indissoluble, sworn community. And this united nation, we have need of it.

- Adolf Hitler, in Berlin, 01 May 1935
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust 02 Oct 2018 20:47 #3262

  • Gaia
  • Gaia's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Gold Member
  • Posts: 7068
  • Likes received: 1542
With the main shiller for this ridiculous story put into the public camp where he can work on his concentration, and still some Mary Poppins clowns who believe this nasty narrative, it is a good time to link this article, arguably the best, nuanced and complete summary of The Great Holocaust Mystery.

Enjoy the read.
The Only Limit is Your Own Imagination
A truth seeker is someone who dares to wade through thick series of toxic smoke screens and tries not to inhale - Gaia
"What do you call 'genius'?" "Well, seeing things others don't see. Or rather the invisible links between things."
- Vladimir Nabokov (1938)
"The silence of conspiracy. Slaughtered on the altar of apathy." - Lords of the New Church (1982)
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust 03 Oct 2018 07:38 #3263

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Online
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 13876
  • Likes received: 5479
Gaia wrote:
Enjoy the read.

Enjoy the read?

We’re all well-aware for loooong time now that the Holocaust is a hoax. Yet you start about this subject again like if it’s all new.

What are you trying to accomplish here exactly?
Try and get some credibility by denying the Holocaust so you can crap over several other subjects?

Better go and watch some more Mark Weber videos. But be careful tho... you might learn something NEW.
So we have come together on this day to prove symbolically that we are more than a collection of individuals striving one against another, that none of us is too proud, none of us too high, none is too rich, and none too poor, to stand together before the face of the Lord and of the world in this indissoluble, sworn community. And this united nation, we have need of it.

- Adolf Hitler, in Berlin, 01 May 1935
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Rocco

The Holocaust 22 Oct 2018 03:08 #3264

  • Voltaire
  • Voltaire's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 3355
  • Likes received: 2010
French/Scots hoax revisionist Robert Faurrison, subject to several vicious physical attacks by jew extremists, died suddenly today of a heart attack. RIP.


Truth is anti-semitic
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust 26 Oct 2018 23:59 #3265

  • steamroller
  • steamroller's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Banned
  • Posts: 752
  • Likes received: 83
Frothy wrote:
Orangeaid posted
While his initial investigation suggests that there were never any mass graves at the Treblinka camp site, Krege believes that further work is still called for.
Mass graves and gas chamber found at Treblinka

First ever archeological dig found evidence the Nazis hid of the death camp where 900,000 Jews were killed

The first-ever archaeological excavations at the Nazi death camp Treblinka in Poland have revealed new mass graves and evidence of gas chambers.

The finds were made by forensic archeologist Caroline Sturdy Colls, who was granted unprecedented access to excavate one of history's greatest crime scenes, where 900,000 Jews were sent to their deaths.

The Nazis razed the death camp in 1943 to hide all evidence of their killing field. But as presented in a new documentary, "Treblinka: Hitler's Killing Machine," which aired on Saturday on the Smithsonian Channel, the dig found brick walls and foundations from the gas chambers, and massive amounts of human bone.

The Nazis began deporting Jews, mostly from the ghettos of Warsaw and Radom, to Treblinka in July 1942. There were two camps. Treblinka I was a forced-labor camp where prisoners were made to manufacture gravel for the Nazi war effort. The nearby Treblinka II was the death factory.

Jews were sent to Treblinka II and told they were going to a transit camp before being sent on to a new life in eastern Europe. The Nazis erected a fake train station in the remote spot, complete with false ticket-counter and clock.

"There was an orchestra set up near the reception area of the camp to play," project leader Caroline Sturdy Colls, a forensic archaeologist who normally works with police to find modern murder victims, told Live Science.
Smithsonian Channel

The corpses were initially buried in mass graves, but later Jewish slave laborers were forced to reopen the graves and cremate the bodies on enormous pyres.

Little physical evidence of this genocide remained. What was known about Treblinka came from Nazi confessions and the eyewitness descriptions of very few survivors, according to the documentary.

When the archaeology team began digging, they uncovered shoes, ammunition, and bones — including bones with cut marks indicating that the victims had been stabbed or otherwise assaulted.

Colls and her team conducted four excavations at Treblinka II, finding a brick wall and foundation. The gas chambers were the
only brick buildings in the camp, Colls said. The excavations also revealed orange tiles that matched eyewitness descriptions of the floor of the killing chambers. Chillingly, each tile was stamped with a Star of David, likely part of the Nazi subterfuge that the building was a Jewish-style bathhouse.

There were two sets of gas chambers built at Treblinka, the first with a capacity of about 600 people, the second able to hold about 5,000
www.i24news.tv/en/news/international/europe/140331-mass-graves-and-gas-chamber-found-at-treblinka

Hey, frothy. Go to my thread, "The holocaust. What a lie!" Give it a whirl.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust 29 Oct 2018 14:38 #3266

THE ZIONIST TREBLINKA ARCHEOLOGICAL HOAX:
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Flare

The Holocaust 02 Nov 2018 17:23 #3267

  • lovejoy
  • lovejoy's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Fresh Member
  • Posts: 86
  • Likes received: 75
Never 6 million, and in all honesty, not even 1.5 mililion, but still, the 6 million figure was scoffed at even then??

There are two ways to be fooled
One is to believe what isn't true
the other is to refuse to believe what is true.
Soren Kierkegaard (1813-1855)
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust 03 Dec 2018 22:41 #3268

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Online
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 13876
  • Likes received: 5479
Gan Anim wrote:
I have been looking for an hour and yet cannot find any records, have you got any links to reliable data, much appreciated.

Edit,

Found some here, there is not as many as I first thought,

thegreateststorynevertold.tv/official-german-record-prisoners-auschwitz-concentration-camp-may-1940-december-1944/

So, now you've got some records with the numbers, you can see there's something totally wrong with the mainstream story of '6.000.000' jews who died due to gassings and mass executions, no?
So we have come together on this day to prove symbolically that we are more than a collection of individuals striving one against another, that none of us is too proud, none of us too high, none is too rich, and none too poor, to stand together before the face of the Lord and of the world in this indissoluble, sworn community. And this united nation, we have need of it.

- Adolf Hitler, in Berlin, 01 May 1935
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust 24 Dec 2018 12:13 #3269

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Online
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 13876
  • Likes received: 5479
So we have come together on this day to prove symbolically that we are more than a collection of individuals striving one against another, that none of us is too proud, none of us too high, none is too rich, and none too poor, to stand together before the face of the Lord and of the world in this indissoluble, sworn community. And this united nation, we have need of it.

- Adolf Hitler, in Berlin, 01 May 1935
Last Edit: 24 Dec 2018 12:13 by Flare.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: novum

The Holocaust 25 Dec 2018 04:48 #3270

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Online
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 13876
  • Likes received: 5479
So we have come together on this day to prove symbolically that we are more than a collection of individuals striving one against another, that none of us is too proud, none of us too high, none is too rich, and none too poor, to stand together before the face of the Lord and of the world in this indissoluble, sworn community. And this united nation, we have need of it.

- Adolf Hitler, in Berlin, 01 May 1935
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust 02 Feb 2019 00:37 #3271

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Online
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 13876
  • Likes received: 5479
How to make 6 Million Cookies

So we have come together on this day to prove symbolically that we are more than a collection of individuals striving one against another, that none of us is too proud, none of us too high, none is too rich, and none too poor, to stand together before the face of the Lord and of the world in this indissoluble, sworn community. And this united nation, we have need of it.

- Adolf Hitler, in Berlin, 01 May 1935
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Rocco

The Holocaust 05 Feb 2019 22:16 #3272

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Online
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 13876
  • Likes received: 5479

The Never ending systematic distribution of misinformation, lies, falsified history and deception.
No other events in the worlds history are protected by law.
So many lies, so much deception.
(((Hollywood))) and TeleviZION ensure the propaganda is always fresh
So we have come together on this day to prove symbolically that we are more than a collection of individuals striving one against another, that none of us is too proud, none of us too high, none is too rich, and none too poor, to stand together before the face of the Lord and of the world in this indissoluble, sworn community. And this united nation, we have need of it.

- Adolf Hitler, in Berlin, 01 May 1935
Last Edit: 05 Feb 2019 22:17 by Flare.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust 06 Feb 2019 17:28 #3273

  • Truthspoon
  • Truthspoon's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Senior Member
  • One foot in hyperspace and the other in some dogshit.
  • Posts: 1714
  • Likes received: 942
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust 10 Feb 2019 22:01 #3274

  • Roastie
  • Roastie's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 2083
  • Likes received: 1717
Plans for an enormous Holocaust Memorial next to the British Parliament have been kicked out .... for the moment
anyway. :thumbup:

"Plans to rip up a historic park next to the Houses of Parliament and build a £50 million Holocaust museum in its place have been called ‘unworkable’ by a Royal charity that manages the site.

The Government chose Victoria Tower Gardens as the place for the new museum and monument, to be provided by Westminster City Council.

But last night, The Royal Parks – which cares for the park – refused to back the plan.

In a damning letter to the council’s planning department, Royal Parks estates director Darren Woodward said that Victoria Tower Gardens was ‘not an appropriate location’, adding that the museum would ‘dominate the park and eclipse the existing listed memorials which are nationally important in their own right’".

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6687213/Plans-rip-park-build-50million-Holocaust-museum-branded-unworkable-Royal-charity.html

“The simple step of a courageous individual is not to take part in the lie." Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn
Last Edit: 10 Feb 2019 22:02 by Roastie.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Flare

The Holocaust 11 Feb 2019 02:05 #3275

  • Voltaire
  • Voltaire's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 3355
  • Likes received: 2010
How could any National Memorial be more important than a memorial to Howlocaust? More anti-semitism, es muss ausgerottet werden.


Truth is anti-semitic
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust 12 Feb 2019 22:32 #3276

  • Voltaire
  • Voltaire's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 3355
  • Likes received: 2010
Here is a doozy imo, unless someone can corroborate
www.webnewsys.com/2019/02/holocaust-survivor-and-soldier-who.html
During the Second World War John's elite unit liberated Jewish female prisoners, among them his wife-to-be Edith, from a work unit just East from the notorious Auschwitz camp.
Edith Steiner, now 92, was 20 years old when she and her mother were sent to the concentration camp. They were in the camp for six whole weeks and were the only members of their family to survive. The rest were immediately sent to the gas chambers.
That very same time, John Mackay, now 96, was in the ranks of a commando team that was able to liberate a substantial number of Jewish prisoners from the said camp.

There is more of this story at the link -

John is clearly a British soldier =

Yet my understanding is that there were no UK units operating on the ostfront (apart from the brits fighting under SS command). Sacre bleu another holocaust miracle. They keep coming.


Truth is anti-semitic
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Rocco

The Holocaust 11 Mar 2019 13:59 #3277

  • Connect Dots
  • Connect Dots's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Fresh Member
  • 9/11 Truth woke me up.
  • Posts: 406
  • Likes received: 74
Connect Dots wrote:
I just discovered this forum a couple of days ago. I haven't read this thread, but I did a search of it and apparently the researcher Ole Dammegard has not been mentioned yet.

In my opinion he is passionate about the truth and is a meticulous investigator and independent thinker.

Here is an interview of him where he talks about the evidence that the Jews were not gassed, and the fact that he was even talking about the subject publicly was very risky. (In my mind, if a subject is that taboo, it's a huge red flag that the official story is suspect.)

Because he is fearless and persistent, Ole Dammegard is one of the most targeted investigators of the TRUTH.

He is one of my most trusted sources.

The Red Ice interview of him that was deleted by YouTube has apparently been uploaded to BitChute, which I cannot embed, but here is the link: Making Critical Thinking Illegal: Questioning the Holocaust - Ole Dammegard.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust 11 Mar 2019 20:54 #3278

  • Connect Dots
  • Connect Dots's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Fresh Member
  • 9/11 Truth woke me up.
  • Posts: 406
  • Likes received: 74
Retired CIA officer and activist in election reform Robert David Steele clearly states what his research shows about the Holocaust:
Robert David Steele: The Holocaust, Zionism, & AIPAC — Guilt by Association
2017/07/05


The time has come to demystify the Holocaust; to carefully distinguish between anti-Zionism which is everyone’s duty and anti-Semitism which is reprehensible, and to put an end to the grip that American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) — an agent of a foreign power by any definition of the term — has on Congress.

Here is my personal take on both the history and the present.

1. The Holocaust happened. Millions died. However, there are several lies by omission that Zionists celebrate and these need to be challenged.

Most of those who died did not die from gassing but rather from Allied bombings, starvation, and typhus. This includes those in prison camps, most of whom died of starvation and typhus, not gassing.

Jews were a distinct and most noteworthy group to die but the number of Russians, Germans, and others who died is greater, and the Holocaust myth as it is still promoted demeans, diminishes, and disrespects all those other deaths.

Genocide, whether against Jews or anyone else including the Palestinians, is the most despicable crime against humanity, perhaps co-equal with pervasive state-sanctioned and state-practiced pedophilia in all its forms. The refusal of the Zionists to honor other genocides and mass murders ranging toward 40-70 million in just one instance, is itself despicable.

Americans must remember that their ancestors genocided the Native Americans and this is said by some to have inspired Hitler against the Jews. No one’s hand’s are clean in this matter.

2. There is clear evidence that most Jews who died in Germany did not have to die. Here is one extract with a source worthy of considerations:

So, WHO, ultimately, was responsible for the suffering of the jews in the labor camps? It was the elite ZIONIST Jews themselves. Rabbi Michael Dov Weissmandl, one of the Rabbis in Germany, actually worked a deal in 1942 with the German government to get ALL the Jews out of the camps and occupied Europe for $3 million US. The Rabbi was overjoyed and immediately went to world Zionist headquarters in Switzerland and apprised them of the offer and asked for the money. The Rabbi was told (paraphrasing), “Go home, Rabbi. You’ll get no money. We intend that a lot of Jews (lower class) suffer and die in the war so that we will have world sympathy to most easily establish the state of Israel after the war.” Rabbi Weissmandl wrote this nightmare up in his 1948 book titled Ten Questions To The Zionists. Look it up. Read and learn the truth.

3. Zionism is a scam and the separation of the Jewish race from the Palestinians — they share the same three DNA ancestors — is a distortion of reality on a holocaust scale. I honor Shlomo Sand for his two works on The Invention of the Jewish People and The Invention of the Land of Israel. Zionism joins the Deep State of the Rothschilds and the Jesuit Black Pope and their banking dynasties as one of the greatest threats to humanity in modern times.

Zionism is seeking to balkanize the Middle East and incite a nuclear war between Saudi Arabia and Iran, at the same time that is is genociding the Palestinians and stealing oil from Syria and water from Jordan.

Zionism is the most toxic foreign influence on the American body politic, matched in its in bribery and blackmail of Members of Congress only by our own secret intelligence agencies (CIA, FBI, NSA). Add to that mind control based within NASA’s covert fascist wing along with pedophilia and drug running, and you have a perfect convergence of domestic and foreign treason.

Zionism is the root factor in perpetuating the US military-industrial complex with a 1,000 overseas bases that are lily pads for smuggling cash, drugs, gold, guns, and small children; the root factor in the US taxpayer giving Israel $30,000 a year for every man, woman, and child in Israel — money better spent here at home — and the root enabler of a criminally insane federal budget that gives primacy to funding dictators abroad while enabling the varied agricultural, energy, food, and prison complexes to impoverish, poison and incarcerate at home.

Zionism hides behind anti-Semitism and expertly manipulates Hollywood and all forms of propaganda, including the fake news mainstream media that serves two masters — Zionism and the Deep State. Zionism is indefensible by the truth and relies on lies, bribery, and blackmail to get its way. The nine million loyal American Jews are not Zionists and they are not the problem.

5. NEVER AGAIN is a useful concept, but all too hypocritical in its current manifestation. Zionists were a party to the assassination of John F. Kennedy — Yitzhak Rabin was the official observer for Israel while George Bush Senior was the lead CIA non-official cover officer (NOC) also on the scene — Zionists have given us the USS Liberty atrocity and were a principal planner and enabler of 9/11 (gleefully commanded by Dick Cheney) and Zionist’s use AIPAC to demand of each Member of Congress a pledge that is in essence an act of treason — an impeachable act of treason, a pledge of allegiance to a foreign power putting Israel First instead of America First.

Never again, indeed.

phibetaiota.net/2017/07/robert-david-steele-the-holocaust-zionism-aipac-guilt-by-association/
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Frothy, Lux Interior

The Holocaust 12 Mar 2019 03:54 #3279

  • Lux Interior
  • Lux Interior's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Do you know de way?
  • Posts: 2086
  • Likes received: 895
I shall recall here just twenty of these victories:
– In 1951 the Jew Léon Poliakov, who had been part of the French delegation at the Nuremberg trial (1945-1946), stated his conclusion that we had at our disposal an overabundance of documents for all points of the history of the Third Reich, with the exception of one point alone: the “campaign to exterminate the Jews”. For this, he wrote, “No document remains,perhaps none has ever existed” (Bréviaire de la haine, Paris, Calmann-Lévy, 1974 [1951], p. 171; English version: Harvest of Hate, New York, Holocaust Library, 1979, revised and expanded edition)\.

Remark: There is here an extraordinary concession to the revisionist case. In effect, such a formidable criminal undertaking supposedly conceived, ordered, organised and perpetrated by the Germans would have necessitated an order, a plan, instructions, a budget, … Such an undertaking, carried out over several years on a whole continent and generating the death of millions of victims, would have left a flood of documentary evidence. Consequently, if we are told that there perhaps has never existed any such documentary evidence, it is because the crime in question was not perpetrated. In the complete absence of documents, the historian has no longer anything to do but keep quiet. L. Poliakov made this concession in 1951, that is, fifty-five years ago. However, it must be noted that, from 1951 to 2006, his successors have equally failed to find the least documentary evidence. Occasionally, here and there, we have witnessed attempts at making us believe in such or such discovery but each time, as will be seen below, the “discoverers” and their publicists have had to drop their claim.

– In 1960 Martin Broszat, a member of the Institute of Contemporary History in Munich, wrote: “Neither at Dachau, nor at Bergen-Belsen, nor at Buchenwald were any Jews or other detainees gassed” (“Keine Vergasung in Dachau”, Die Zeit, August 19, 1960, p. 16)\.

Remark: This sudden and unexplained concession is significant. At the Nuremberg trial the only homicidal gas chamber that the accusation ventured to show in a film had been that of Dachau, and the testimonies telling of alleged homicidal gassings in the three above-mentioned camps had been numerous. M. Broszat thus implicitly acknowledged that those testimonies were false. He did not tell us in what respect they were false. Nor did he tell us in what respect other such testimonies relating, for example, to Auschwitz, Majdanek, Treblinka, Sobibor or Belzec should, for their part, go on being deemed reliable. In the 1980s, at Dachau, a sign indicated in five languages that the “gas chamber disguised as showers”, visited by the tourists, was “never used” as such. The revisionists had then asked in what respect the room could be termed a homicidal “gas chamber”, whereupon the Dachau Museum authorities took down the sign and replaced it with another on which, in German and English, can now be read: “Gas chamber. This was the center of potential mass murder. The room was disguised as ‘showers’ and equipped with fake shower spouts to mislead the victims and prevent them from refusing to enter the room. During a period of 20 minutes up to 150 people at a time could be suffocated to death through prussic acid poison gas (Zyklon B).” One will note the words “potential” and “could”, the choice of which attests to a fine bit of trickery: the information spawns in visitors’ minds the idea that the said “gas chamber” was effectively used for killing but, at the same time, it enables the museum to retort to revisionists: “We haven’t expressly said that this gas chamber was used for killing; we’ve merely said that it could be or could have been, at the time, used to kill a certain number of people”\. To conclude, in 1960 M. Broszat, without any explanation, decreed in a simple letter that no one had been gassed at Dachau; thenceforth, the Dachau Museum authorities, quite embarrassed, have tried, by means of assorted deceitful ploys varying over time, to fool their visitors into believing that, in this room that looks like showers (and for good reason, since that is what it was), people had well and truly been gassed.

– In 1968 the Jewish historian Olga Wormser-Migot, in her thesis on Le Système concentrationnaire nazi, 1933-1945, (Paris, Presses universitaires de France), gave an ample exposition of what she called “the problem of the gas chambers” (p. 541-544). She voiced her scepticism as to the worth of some well-known witnesses’ accounts attesting to the existence of gas chambers in camps such as Mauthausen or Ravensbrück. On Auschwitz-I she was categorical: that camp where, still today, tourists visit an alleged gas chamber was, in reality, “without any gas chamber” (p. 157)\.

Remark: To bring their horrible charges of homicidal gassings against the defeated, the accusers have relied solely on testimonies and those testimonies have not been verified. Let us take note of the particular case of Auschwitz-I: it was thus 38 years ago that a Jewish historian had the courage to write that this camp was “without any gas chamber”; however, still today, in 2006, crowds of tourists there visit an enclosed space that the authorities dare to present, fallaciously, as a “gas chamber”. Here we see a practice of outright deceit.

– In 1961 the Jew Raul Hilberg, orthodox historian Number One, published the first edition of his major work, The Destruction of the European Jews, and it was in 1985 that he brought out the second edition, a profoundly revised and corrected version. The distance between the two is considerable and can only be explained by the succession of victories achieved in the meantime by the revisionists. In the first edition the author had brazenly affirmed that “the destruction of the Jews of Europe” had been set off following two consecutive orders given by Hitler. He neither specified the date nor reproduced the wording thereof. Then he professed to explain in detail the political, administrative and bureaucratic process of that destruction; for example he went so far as to write that at Auschwitz the extermination of the Jews was organised by an office that was in charge of both the disinfection of clothing and the extermination of human beings (The Destruction of the European Jews, 1961, republished in 1979 by Quadrangle Books, Chicago, p. 177, 570). However, in 1983, going back completely on that explanation, Hilberg suddenly proceeded to state that the business of “the destruction of the European Jews” had, after all, gone on without a plan, without any organisation, centralisation, project or budget, but altogether thanks to “an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus-mind reading by a far-flung bureaucracy” (Newsday, New York, February 23, 1983, p. II/3). He would confirm this explanation under oath at the first Zündel trial in Toronto on January 16, 1985 (verbatim transcript, p. 848); he would soon afterwards confirm it anew but with other words in the greatly revised version of his above-mentioned work (New York, Holmes & Meier, 1985, p. 53, 55, 62). He has just recently, in October 2006, confirmed it yet again in an interview given to Le Monde: “There was no pre-established guiding plan. As for the question of the decision, it is in part unsolvable: no order signed by Hitler has ever been found, doubtless because no such document ever existed. I am persuaded that the bureaucracies moved through a sort of latent structure: each decision brings on another, then another, and so forth, even if it isn’t possible to foresee exactly the next step” (Le Monde des livres, October 20, 2006, p. 12)\.

Remark: The Number One historian of the Jewish genocide, at a certain point, thus found himself so helpless that he suddenly proceeded to disown his first version and to explain a gigantic undertaking of collective murder as if it had all been carried out through something like the workings of the Holy Spirit. In effect, since then he has evoked a “meeting of minds” within a bureaucracy, terming this meeting “incredible”. If it is “incredible” or unbelievable, why then should it be believed? Must one believe the unbelievable? He also brings up “mind reading” and states it was performed by “consensus”, but this is a matter of pure intellectual speculation grounded in a belief in the supernatural. How can one believe in such a phenomenon, particularly within a vast bureaucratic structure and, still more particularly, within the bureaucracy of the Third Reich? It is worth noting that on R. Hilberg’s example the other official historians set about, in the 1980s and 1990s, abandoning history and lapsed into metaphysics and jargon. They questioned themselves on the point of whether one should be “intentionalist” or “functionalist”: must it be supposed that the extermination of the Jews occurred subsequent to an “intent” (not yet proved) and in line with a concerted plan (not yet found), or instead had that extermination happened all by itself, spontaneously and through improvisation, without there being any formal intent and with no plan? This type of woolly controversy attests to the disarray of historians who, unable to provide evidence and real documents to back their case, are thus reduced to theorising in the void. At bottom, those on one side, the “intentionalists”, tell us: “There were necessarily an intent and a plan, which we haven’t yet found but which we shall perhaps indeed discover one day”, whereas the others affirm: “There is no need to go looking for evidence of an intent and a plan, for everything was able to occur without intent, without plan and without leaving any traces; such traces are not to be found because they have never existed.”

– In May 1986 in France, certain Jews, alarmed upon realising that they could not manage to answer the revisionists on the simple plane of reason, decided to take action with a view to obtaining a legal prohibition of revisionism. Chief amongst them were Georges Wellers and Pierre Vidal-Naquet, grouped, with their friends, round the country’s head rabbi René-Samuel Sirat (Bulletin quotidien de l’Agence télégraphique juive, June 1986, p. 1, 3). After four years, on July 13, 1990, they would get, thanks notably to Jewish former Prime Minister Laurent Fabius, then president of the National Assembly, a special law passed allowing for the punishment of any person who publicly made revisionist statements on the subject of the “extermination of the Jews”: up to a year’s imprisonment, a fine of €45,000 and still other sanctions. This recourse to force is a flagrant admission of weakness\.

Remark: G. Wellers and P. Vidal-Naquet were especially alarmed by the court decision of April 26, 1983 (see paragraph 8 above). The former wrote: “The court admitted that [Faurisson] was well documented, which is false. It is astonishing that the court should fall for that” (Le Droit de vivre, June-July 1987, p. 13). The latter wrote that the Paris Court of Appeal “recognised the seriousness of Faurisson’s work — which is quite outrageous — ¬and finally found him guilty only of having acted malevolently by summarising his theses as slogans” (Les Assassins de la mémoire, Paris, La Découverte, 1987, p. 182; here quoted the English translation: Assassins of Memory, New York, Columbia University Press, 1992).

– In August 1986 Michel de Boüard, himself deported during the war as a résistant, professor of history and Dean of letters at the University of Caen (Normandy), member of the Institut de France and former head of the Commission d’histoire de la déportation within the official Comité d’histoire de la deuxième guerre mondiale, declared that, all told, “the dossier is rotten”. He specified that the dossier in question, that of the history of the German concentration camp system, was “rotten” due to, in his own words, “a huge amount of made-up stories, inaccuracies stubbornly repeated — particularly where numbers are concerned — amalgamations and generalisations”. Alluding to the revisionists’ studies, he added that there were “on the other side, very carefully done critical studies demonstrating the inanity of those exaggerations” (Ouest-France of August 2nd and 3rd, 1986, p. 6)\.

Remark: Michel de Boüard was a professional historian, indeed the ablest French historian on the subject of the wartime deportations. Up to 1985 he defended the strictly orthodox and official position. Upon reading the revisionist Henri Roques’s doctoral thesis on the alleged testimony of SS man Kurt Gerstein, he saw his error. He honestly acknowledged it, going so far as to say that, if he hitherto personally upheld the existence of a gas chamber in the Mauthausen camp, he had done so wrongly, on the faith of what was said around him. (His untimely death in 1989 deprived the revisionist camp of an eminent personality who had resolved to publish a new work aiming to put historians on their guard against the official lies of Second World War history).

– In 1988 Arno Mayer, an American professor of Jewish origin teaching contemporary European history at Princeton University, wrote on the subject of the Nazi gas chambers: “Sources for the study of the gas chambers are at once rare and unreliable” (The “Final Solution” in History, New York, Pantheon Books, p. 362)\.

Remark: Still today in, 2006, the greater public persist in believing that, as the media tirelessly suggest, the sources for the study of the gas chambers are innumerable and unquestionable. At the Sorbonne symposium of 1982, A. Mayer, like his friend Pierre Vidal-Naquet, could not find words harsh enough for the revisionists; however, six years later, here was an ultra-orthodox historian who had drawn considerably closer to the revisionists’ findings.

– In 1989 Swiss historian Philippe Burrin, laying down as a premise, without demonstration, the reality of Nazi gas chambers and Jewish genocide, attempted to determine at what date and by whom the decision to exterminate physically the Jews of Europe had been taken. He did not succeed any more than all his “intentionalist” or “functionalist” colleagues (Hitler et les juifs / Genèse d’un génocide, Paris, Seuil; English version: Hitler and the Jews: the Genesis of the Holocaust, London, Edward Arnold, 1994). He had to remark the absence of traces of the crime and note what he decided to call “the stubborn erasure of the trace of anyone’s passing through” (p. 9). He bemoaned “the large gaps in the documentation” and added: “There subsists no document bearing an extermination order signed by Hitler. […] In all likelihood, the orders were given verbally. […] here the traces are not only few and far between, but difficult to interpret” (p. 13)\.

Remark: Here again is a professional historian who acknowledges that he can produce no documents in support of the official case. The greater public imagine that the traces of Hitler’s crime are many and unambiguous but the historian who has examined the relevant documentation has, for his part, found nothing but sparse semblances and “traces”, and wonders what interpretation to give to them.

– In 1992 Yehuda Bauer, professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, stated at an international conference on the genocide of the Jews held in London: “The public still repeats, time after time, the silly story that at Wannsee the extermination of the Jews was arrived at” (Jewish Telegraphic Agency release published as “Wannsee’s importance rejected”, Canadian Jewish News, January 30, 1992, p. 8)\.

Remark: Apart from the fact that a careful reading of the “minutes” of the Berlin-Wannsee meeting of January 20, 1942 proves that the Germans envisaged a “territorial final solution [eine territoriale Endlösung] of the Jewish question” in a geographical space to be determined, Yehuda Bauer’s quite belated declaration confirms that this major point of the case alleging the extermination of the Jews is in fact worthless. Let us add, in our turn, that the extermination of the Jews was decided on neither at Wannsee nor anywhere else; the expression “extermination camps” is but an invention of American war propaganda and there are examples proving that, during that war, the killing of a single Jewish man or woman exposed the perpetrator, whether soldier or civilian, member of the SS or not, to German military justice proceedings and the possibility of being shot by firing squad (in sixty years, never has a sole orthodox historian provided an explanation for such facts, revealed by the defence before the Nuremberg tribunal itself).

– In January 1995 French historian Eric Conan, co-author with Henry Rousso of Vichy, un passé qui ne passe pas (Paris, Gallimard, 2001 [1994, 1996]; English edition: Vichy: an ever-present past, Hanover, New Hampshire and London, University Press of New England, 1998), wrote that I had been right after all to certify, in the late 1970s, that the gas chamber thus far visited by millions of tourists at Auschwitz was completely fake. According to E. Conan, expressing himself in a leading French weekly: “Everything in it is false […]. In the late 1970s, Robert Faurisson exploited these falsifications all the better as the [Auschwitz] museum administration balked at acknowledging them”. Conan went on: “[Some people], like Théo Klein [former president of the CRIF, the ‘Representative Council of Jewish Institutions of France’], prefer to leave it in its present state, whilst explaining the misrepresentation to the public: ‘History is what it is; it suffices to tell it, even when it is not simple, rather than to add artifice to artifice’”. Conan then related a staggering remark by Krystyna Oleksy, deputy director of the Auschwitz National Museum, who, for her part, could not find the resolve to explain the misrepresentation to the public. He wrote: “Krystyna Oleksy […] can’t bring herself to do so: ‘For the time being [the room designated as a gas chamber] is to be left “as is”, with nothing specified to the visitor. It’s too complicated. We’ll see to it later on’”(“Auschwitz: la mémoire du mal” [Auschwitz: the remembrance of evil], L’Express, January 19-25, 1995, p. 68)\.

Remark: This statement by a Polish official means, in plain language: we have lied, we are lying and, until further notice, we shall continue to lie. In 2005 I asked E. Conan whether the Auschwitz Museum authorities had issued a denial or raised any protest against the statement that he, in 1995, had ascribed to K. Oleksy. His answer was that there had been neither denial nor protest. In 1996, this imposture and others as well concerning the Auschwitz-I camp were denounced by two Jewish authors, Robert Jan van Pelt and Deborah Dwork, in a work they produced together: Auschwitz, 1270 to the Present, Yale University Press, 443 p. Here is a sampling of their words in that regard: “postwar obfuscation”, “additions”, “deletions”, “suppression”, “reconstruction”, “largely a postwar reconstruction” (p. 363), “reconstructed”, “usurpation”, “re-created”, “four hatched openings in the roof, as if for pouring Zyklon B into the gas chamber below, were installed [after the war]” (p. 364), “ falsified”, “inexact”, “misinformation”, “inappropriate” (p. 367), “falsifying” (p. 369). In 2001 the fallacious character of this Potemkin village gas chamber was also acknowledged in a French booklet accompanying two CD-Roms entitled Le Négationnisme; written by Jean-Marc Turine and Valérie Igounet, it was prefaced by Simone Veil (Radio France-INA, Vincennes, Frémeaux & Associés).

– In 1996 the leftwing French historian Jacques Baynac, a staunch antirevisionist since 1978, ended up admitting, after due consideration, that there was no evidence of the Nazi gas chambers’ existence. One could not fail to note, wrote Baynac, “the absence of documents, traces or other material evidence” (Le Nouveau Quotidien de Lausanne [Switzerland], September 2, 1996, p. 16, and September 3, 1996, p. 14). But he said that he carried on believing in the existence of those magical gas chambers\.

Remark: All in all, J. Baynac says: “There is no evidence but I believe”, whereas a revisionist thinks: “There is no evidence, therefore I refuse to believe and it is my duty to dispute.”

– In 2000, at the end of her book Histoire du négationnisme en France (Paris, Gallimard), Valérie Igounet published a long text by Jean-Claude Pressac at the end of which the latter, who had been one of the revisionists’ most determined opponents, signed a veritable act of surrender. In effect, taking up the words of professor Michel de Boüard, he stated that the dossier on the concentration camp system was “rotten”, and irremediably so. He wrote asking: “Can things be put back on an even keel?” and answered: “It is too late”. He added: “The current form, albeit triumphant, of the presentation of the camp universe is doomed”. He finished by surmising that everything that had been invented around sufferings all too real was bound “for the rubbish bins of history” (p. 651-652). In 1993-1994, that protégé of the French Jew Serge Klarsfeld and the American rabbi Michael Berenbaum, “Project Director” at the Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, had been acclaimed worldwide as an extraordinary researcher who, in his book on Les Crématoires d’Auschwitz, la machinerie du meurtre de masse (Paris, CNRS éditions, 1993; English title: The Auschwitz Crematories. The Machinery of Mass Murder ), had, it appeared, felled the hydra of revisionism. Here, in V. Igounet’s book, he was seen signing his act of surrender\.

Remark: The greater public are kept in ignorance of a major fact: the man who had supposedly saved the day for History, who once was presented by the world press as an extraordinary researcher who had at last discovered the scientific proof of the Nazi gas chambers’ existence, ended up acknowledging his error. A few years later, not a single newspaper or magazine announced his death.

– In 2002, R. J. van Pelt, already mentioned, published The Case for Auschwitz. Evidence from the Irving Trial, Indiana University Press, XVIII-571 p. As is widely known, David Irving, who at the very most is a semi-revisionist ill-acquainted with the revisionist argumentation, lost the libel suit he had recklessly brought against the Jewish-American academic Deborah Lipstadt. He tried clumsily to make the case — a perfectly right one, for that matter — that there had existed no homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz. But he nonetheless scored an essential point and, if Justice Charles Gray and other judges after him had had more courage, that point would have enabled him to succeed in his claim. The argument was summed up in a four-word phrase that I first put forth in 1994: “No holes, no Holocaust”. My reasoning behind it was as follows: 1. Auschwitz is at the centre of the “Holocaust”; 2. The great crematoria of Auschwitz-Birkenau, or Auschwitz-II, are at the centre of the vast Auschwitz complex; 3. At the heart of these crematoria there were, supposedly, one or several homicidal gas chambers; 4. At a single one of these crematoria (crematorium n° 2), although it is in ruins, is it today possible to go and examine the room said to have been a gas chamber; it is the presumed scene of the crime, itself presumed as well; 5. We are told that, in order to kill the Jewish detainees locked inside, an SS man, moving about on the concrete roof of the said gas chamber, poured Zyklon-B pellets through four regular openings situated in the roof; 6. However, one need only have eyes to realise that no such openings have ever existed there; 7. Therefore the crime cannot have been committed. For R. J. van Pelt, testifying against Irving, it was near torture trying to find a reply to this argument. Justice Gray as well had to acknowledge “the apparent absence of evidence of holes” (p. 490 of the verbatim transcript) and, in a more general way, he conceded that “contemporaneous documents yield little clear evidence of the existence of gas chambers designed to kill humans” (p. 489; for more details one may consult pages 458-460, 466-467, 475-478 and 490-506). In the text of his judgment, Charles Gray admitted surprise: “I have to confess that, in common I suspect with most other people, I had supposed that the evidence of mass extermination of Jews in the gas chambers at Auschwitz was compelling. I have, however, set aside this preconception when assessing the evidence adduced by the parties in these proceedings” (13.71). Here the failure of the accusing historians is flagrant and Irving ought to have won his case thanks to that observation by a judge who was hostile towards him: the documents of the era furnish us with but decidedly little clear evidence of the Nazi gas chambers’ existence and thus of a German policy to exterminate the Jews. Is this not, after all — as we have seen above —, what several Jewish historians had already concluded, beginning with Léon Poliakov in 1951?

– In 2004 French historian Florent Brayard published a work entitled La « solution finale de la question juive ». La technique, le temps et les catégories de la décision, Paris, Fayard, 640 p. In 2005, in a review of this book, the following three sentences could be read: “It is known that the Führer neither drafted nor signed any order to eliminate the Jews, that the decisions — for there were several — were taken in the secrecy of talks with Himmler, perhaps Heydrich and/orGöring. It is supposed that, rather than an explicit order, Hitler gave his consent to his interlocutors’ requests or projects. Perhaps he did not even put it into words, but made himself understood by a silence or an acquiescence” (Yves Ternon, Revue d’histoire de la Shoah, July-December 2005, p. 537)\.

Remark: At nearly every word, these sentences show that their author is reduced to adventurous speculations. When he dares to express, without the benefit of the least clue, the notion that Hitler perhaps made himself understood “by a silence or an acquiescence”, he is merely taking up the theory of the “nod” (the Führer’s mere nod!) first voiced by American professor Christopher Browning at the Zündel trial in Toronto in 1988. No academic of antirevisionist persuasion has shown himself to be more pitiful and foolish than that shabbos-goy. So true is it that, destroyed by the revisionist victories, the official case has ended up being emptied of all scientific content
liberabo te ab inferno
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Hunter

The Holocaust 18 Mar 2019 02:40 #3280

  • Lux Interior
  • Lux Interior's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Do you know de way?
  • Posts: 2086
  • Likes received: 895
liberabo te ab inferno
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Flare
Moderators: novum, rodin, Flare
Powered by Kunena Forum

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it. Secure transactions via paypal.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2019 - May 2020, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 270 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 100 - Raised
( £ 80 GBP )
donation thermometer
29%
Updated
31st May 2019

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.