Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: The Holocaust

The Holocaust 05 Mar 2020 22:42 #3561

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 17368
  • Likes received: 6312

Eva Schloss Enjoyed Being Tickled by Nazis in the Showers and Would Eat All Day


March 5, 2020 renegade



Eva Schloss recalls being tickled by the good looking Nazis and eating all day while working in the sorting section of Auschwitz.




Bitchute link




Bitchute link



www.renegadetribune.com/eva-schloss-enjoyed-being-tickled-by-nazis-in-the-showers-and-would-eat-all-day/
Last Edit: 05 Mar 2020 22:43 by Flare.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust 12 Mar 2020 20:58 #3562

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 17368
  • Likes received: 6312

Eichmann Trial – Crude Cartoons Submitted as Evidence


March 12, 2020 renegade



Crude cartoons submitted as evidence by Vera Alexander during the Eichmann Trial. The artist is Naomi Judkowski. This proves it, folks…






Bitchute link
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust 17 Mar 2020 08:39 #3563

  • Frothy
  • Frothy's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Released
  • Posts: 17862
  • Likes received: 1854
Jews LARPing as Nazis
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust 18 Mar 2020 19:18 #3564

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 17368
  • Likes received: 6312

Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp?


March 15, 2020 Meža Vilks


By Carlo Mattogno


The theme of the present study is Treblinka, which was situated not far from the hamlet of the same name, approximately 80 km northeast of Warsaw. Treblinka is without a doubt the best known of the four ‘pure extermination camps’; in public consciousness, imprinted by media reports, it has become one of the darkest hallmarks of the ‘Holocaust,’ second only to Auschwitz.

Two of these camps, Auschwitz and Majdanek, are supposed to have originally been established as normal concentration camps, but later served as ‘extermination camps’ as well, in which the able-bodied jews were used in forced labor, while those unable to work were gassed. Furthermore, as the official historical version would have it, there were four ‘pure extermination camps,’ namely Treblinka, Sobibór, Bełżec, and Chełmno (Kulmhof), serving the exclusive purpose of annihilating jews. Except for a handful of ‘labor jews,’ who were necessary for keeping the camp in operation, all jews transported there, regardless of age or state of health, were murdered without any record being made of them.

Treblinka, Sobibór, and Bełżec, often designated in the literature as ‘camps of Operation Reinhardt,’ were located in the east of the General Gouvernement, thus in German-occupied Poland. In these three camps, mass murder was supposedly committed in stationary gas chambers by means of exhaust gasses from diesel engines. On the other hand, in Chełmno, situated northwest of Lodz, gas vehicles were supposed to have served as murder weapons. According to the official version of history, in all four ‘pure extermination camps’ the corpses of the murdered were initially buried in enormous mass graves, but later, when it became clear that the military defeat of the German Reich was impending, exhumed and burned in the open air.

The claims regarding mass murder and the disposal of bodies are based entirely and exclusively upon eyewitness testimony. Documents from these camps are almost completely missing, which the official version of history explains by saying that either the National Socialists did not compile any or – in the case that documents did exist – they destroyed them in time, enough not to leave behind any proof of their atrocities. For the same reason, it is claimed, Treblinka, Sobibór, Bełżec, and Chełmno were also totally destroyed before the German retreat. In fact, the visitor finds almost no tangible traces at the sites where these camps once were.

Under these circumstances, an historian who wishes to check the picture of the four ‘pure extermination camps’ outlined here with scientific methods sees himself confronting a far more difficult task than a researcher who has set himself the same goal with respect to Auschwitz or Majdanek. The latter can study the documents of the camp administration, which are available in great number; he can examine the facilities – some of them preserved in undamaged condition, others in ruins – which according to the prevailing notion served as gas chambers for killing human beings, to see whether their structure was suited for such a function and whether the crematoria were capable of turning into ashes the number of bodies claimed. All of these possibilities are denied to the historian of the ‘pure extermination camps.’

The Treblinka camp consisted of two camps, Treblinka I and Treblinka II. It is undisputed that Treblinka I served purely as a labor camp. The alleged ‘extermination camp’ bore the designation Treblinka II. This was about 4 km distant from the village of the same name, less than 2 km from the Bug River; it was on the train line running from Ostrów Mazowiecki to Siedlce, which intersected with the more important railway line from Warsaw to Białystok at the Małkinia Station. All three of the alleged ‘eastern extermination camps’ were erected in a border zone: Treblinka near the border between the General Gouvernement and the Białystok region, Sobibór not far from the border between the General Gouvernement and the Reichskommissariat Ukraine, and Bełżec between the district of Lublin and the district of Galicia.

Treblinka II was situated in an area that was by no means particularly remote, and it concealed few secrets. The train line leading from the village of Treblinka to Siedlce ran at a distance of only 300 meters from the camp, parallel to the nearby road; a branch of this train line led to the camp, and from there to the labor camp Treblinka I. Scarcely two kilometers farther on is the village of Wólka Okrąglik; in the opposite direction, approximately 2 km distant from Treblinka I, were the hamlets of Grady and Poniatowo.

The few material traces of Treblinka II, which still existed at the arrival of the Bolsheviks in August 1944, were completely removed during the course of the years and no longer exist today. From 1959 until 1964, Treblinka attained its present form: a large sector of the camp ground was embedded in concrete and 17,000 cement blocks reminiscent of grave monuments were erected there. In the center, a gigantic monument of stone was built. At the entrance to the camp, stones proclaim in several languages that here “more than 800,000 jews” were killed between July 1942 and August 1943. Concrete railroad ties, flanked by a platform likewise made of concrete, symbolize the train tracks and the train platform of the camp. Otherwise there is nothing for the eye to see but a meadow rimmed by fir trees.

One reaches the area where Treblinka I once stood by a forest path of some two kilometers length, and along the way one can see the old gravel pit. Shortly before this, one comes upon a small cemetery where Polish prisoners rest who died in the labor camp. In an area of the former camp ground, surrounded by a forest of fir trees, concrete foundations can be found, approximately 12 m × 60 m in dimension, upon which former camp barracks stood. In Section 3 of Chapter III, the reader will find a detailed description of the area in which Treblinka I and Treblinka II were located.

From time to time during the immediate postwar period, there was talk of up to three million people having been murdered in Treblinka II. The two most important standard works of contemporary ‘Holocaust’ historiography mention the number of victims as 750,000 (Raul Hilberg), or as 870,000 (Encyclopedia of the Holocaust).

We have set ourselves the task of subjecting the portrait of the ‘extermination camp’ of Treblinka as summarized above to a critical examination, and should it not stand up to this examination, of offering an alternative thesis regarding the real function of the camp.

In 1987, Robert Faurisson wrote the following noteworthy lines:


“‘Shoah’-business will continue to prosper. The Holocaust Museums are going to multiply and Holocaust propaganda will continue to invade the high schools and universities. The concentration camps will become attractions comparable to Disneyland. […] Tour operators are beginning to calculate the profit they can derive from these places, at which there is in reality nothing to see but where, as a result, they will fill the void with ‘symbols.’ The less there is to see with your eyes, the more they will give you to see in your imagination. From that point of view, Treblinka is an ideal place. Everything there is symbolic: the entrance to the camp, its boundaries, the railway line, the access ramp, the path to the ‘gas chambers,’ the ‘open air funeral pyres,’ and the sites of the ‘chambers’ and ‘funeral pyres.’”


Yes, Treblinka is, in fact, the most fitting landmark of the ‘Holocaust,’ a mirage of a million-fold genocide in gas chambers, of which not the slightest documentary or material trace exists and about which we would know nothing without the tales of a handful of ‘eyewitnesses.’ From the beginning of the ‘Holocaust’ propaganda, Auschwitz has had first rank and Treblinka second; there has always been far less discussion of the other four ‘extermination camps.’

The facts and circumstantial evidence assembled so far lead to the conclusion that Treblinka was mainly a transit camp established for the jewish population of the Warsaw district, which fits within the framework of National Socialist policy of the resettlement of jews to the east. The verifiable deportations to Treblinka can be explained in this sense.

Above all, it is entirely unclear where the jews deported to Treblinka ultimately wound up. That Treblinka served as a transit camp is proven, but for the most part we are still in the dark as to the details (the number of those resettled, their destinations, and their fate during the war and afterwards). In coming years, it is to be hoped that the improving access to archives in the successor states of the Soviet Union will make it possible for researchers to shed more and more light into this darkness. When we speak of researchers, we of course mean the revisionists, for their opponents will hardly be doing such work.

file:///home/chronos/u-17202e3b10259cac245ef0fdffb1b575fcde4624/MyFiles/Downloads/Holohoax%20Handbooks/Vol8CampTreblinka.pdf


www.renegadetribune.com/treblinka-extermination-camp-or-transit-camp/
Last Edit: 18 Mar 2020 19:19 by Flare.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust 19 Mar 2020 02:06 #3565

  • Frothy
  • Frothy's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Released
  • Posts: 17862
  • Likes received: 1854
Why did the Treblinka Labour Camp require it's own Transit Camp, surely the labour force get the train directly to the Labour Camp?
Jews LARPing as Nazis
Last Edit: 19 Mar 2020 02:09 by Frothy.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust 19 Mar 2020 20:34 #3566

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 17368
  • Likes received: 6312

Auschwitz: Crematorium I and the Alleged Homicidal Gassings


March 18, 2020 Meža Vilks



By Carlo Mattogno



The orthodox history of the plan for the extermination of the jews that was allegedly implemented at Auschwitz between 1942 and 1944 begins, as is well known, with an impalpable event: the first homicidal gassing in the basement of Block 11 of Auschwitz. This deed is said to have taken place between September 3 and 5, 1941, and to have led to the death of 250 sick detainees and 600 Soviet prisoners of war. I dedicated an in-depth study to this alleged event in 1992 – published in English and German in a revised, corrected, and enlarged edition – in which I demonstrated that this event has no historical foundation.

Orthodox historiography affirms that, because the basement of Block 11 caused too much time to be lost in ventilation, the homicidal gassings were subsequently moved to the morgue (Leichenhalle) of Crematorium I, the old crematorium (altes Krematorium) at Auschwitz, and that this space was then equipped with a ventilation device to make it suitable for such a purpose. There is, however, no trace in the documents of any such criminal use of this facility.

Initially at least, the homicidal activity, which allegedly went on in this morgue, is said to have been of an experimental nature aiming at a refinement of the method used. As in the case of the “first gassing,” this activity rests entirely on testimony. In view of the total absence of documentary confirmation, this alleged milestone of the orthodox narrative of the camp was for decades relegated to the murky sidelines of historical research, generally dealt with in a few pages, if not a few lines of text.

In the present study, which is the logical sequel to Auschwitz: The First Gassing, I shall examine the topic of the alleged gassings in the morgue of Crematorium I from three converging viewpoints: the origin of the account and its development in the testimonies; the ventilation projects for Crematorium I and their implementation; and the material and documentary evidence.

The conclusions of this three-pronged approach, as we shall see in the chapters that follow, squarely contradict the assertions of orthodox historiography and lay bare the true nature of their shaky conjectures, which have no objective backing.

From April 1941 onwards, various resistance groups that had sprung up among the detainees regularly sent out detailed reports on the events in the camp, which were then collected and disseminated by the Polish government in exile in London. These reports, published by the Auschwitz Museum as a book of nearly 200 pages refer several times to rumors relating to the first alleged gassing in the basement of Block 11 – which, however, is never mentioned – as well as to the alleged homicidal activity in the two provisional gas chambers at Birkenau, the so-called “Bunkers” – likewise never referred to by that name.

The story of homicidal gassings in the morgue of Crematorium I attracted no particular interest from the various underground resistance groups at Auschwitz. They used it only once in their propaganda reports, and rather late at that.

The testimonies on alleged gassings are meager and mutually contradictory. The most detailed ones, and thus those that can be checked most easily, are notoriously and demonstrably false. In this category we find primarily the accounts by Filip Müller and Pery Broad. Notoriously and demonstrably false is also the claim about the only alleged homicidal gassing for which we have verifiable data (date, number, nationality, origin, and serial numbers of the victims): the gassing of the so-called “Sonderkommando” of December 1942.

The “reconstructions” by the orthodox historians are purely conjectural and fictitious. Having no documentary basis, they rely entirely on “accounts collected at the spur of the moment, adjusted to produce arbitrary truths,” according to the well-known practice, which Pressac ascribes to all previous historiography, but which applies to him as well.

An examination of the archives of Neubauleitung (later Bauleitung and finally Zentralbauleitung, Central Construction Office) of Auschwitz allows us to retrace the history of the ventilation projects for the crematorium elaborated by the Topf firm, and to establish with sufficient precision how the various temporary systems installed there were set up and how they worked. These projects and their realizations were carried out in line with the needs of a normal morgue and not a “homicidal gas chamber” as hypothesized without the least documentary evidence.

Finally, an analysis of the alleged Zyklon B introduction openings in the roof of the morgue demonstrates that the openings installed by the Poles in the immediate post-war period are necessarily in keeping with the architectural structure at that time, which was different from the structure the crematorium had in 1942. For this reason, they cannot have any relationship with the alleged original openings. In any case, there is no material or documentary trace of the latter.

Summary and Conclusion


1) There is no proof that the alleged openings for the introduction of Zyklon B ever existed in the morgue of Crematorium I.

2) There is no proof that the morgue was ever equipped with two gas-tight doors.

3) In contradiction to any kind of logical planning, these alleged gas chamber doors are said to have later been removed by the SS, when the crematorium was converted to a gas-tight air-raid shelter, and replaced by one normal door and one standard gas-tight door.

4) The traces of cyanides present in the walls of the morgue do not prove that the room was used as a homicidal gas chamber.

5) The number of openings made by the Poles after the war (four) is at variance with all available testimonies. This also goes for the figure adopted by the members of the Holocaust History Project (five).

6) The Polish “reconstruction” of both the location of the openings and the structure and dimensions of the Zyklon B introduction shafts has no basis in documents or in witness statements. In fact, there are no documents, and no witness has furnished any detailed information on these.

7) There is no proof that the four dark spots visible on the roof of Crematorium I in the photograph published by Pressac are traces of former openings that were later sealed; on the contrary, the location of no former hole in the morgue’s ceiling corresponds to the location of any of these dark spots.

8) The remaining traces of former openings in the ceiling are circular and are no doubt connected to the transformation of the crematorium into an air-raid shelter.

9) The openings created by the Poles make sense, geometrically speaking, only in the context of the present state of the room, but are totally asymmetric and irrational when seen in the context of its original state – which is further proof that they have nothing whatsoever to do with any alleged original openings.

The alleged use of the morgue of Crematorium I at Auschwitz as a gas chamber has therefore no historical foundation. It is not history but historical propaganda, laboriously reworked over the decades.

file:///home/chronos/u-17202e3b10259cac245ef0fdffb1b575fcde4624/MyFiles/Downloads/Holohoax%20Handbooks/Vol21AuschwitzCrematorium1.pdf


www.renegadetribune.com/auschwitz-crematorium-i-and-the-alleged-homicidal-gassings/
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust 28 Mar 2020 12:55 #3567

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 17368
  • Likes received: 6312
Italy can't handle the amount of cremations due to the Corona virus.



Italy: Coffins pile up in Piacenza crematorium as coronavirus death toll continues to rise





Perhaps they should ask the Germans advice on how to handle?

Since they apparently were able to cremate 6 million jews within the timespan of 2 years on 'old' crematoria equipment, while in the meantime they were fighting a 2-front world war.
Last Edit: 28 Mar 2020 12:56 by Flare.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: novum, Lux Interior

The Holocaust 03 Jun 2020 18:44 #3568

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 17368
  • Likes received: 6312

Did Six Million Really Die?


June 2, 2020 renegade


‘Did Six Million Really Die? The Truth At Last: Exposed’ is an infamous pamphlet, which has taken on a life of its own, since its initial publication in 1974. The pamphlet is purported to be written by a Richard E. Harwood. Historian Mark Weber later testified the author’s true identity is Richard Verrall. Verall was a graduate of the University of London, and an authoritative source on political and diplomatic aspects of the Second World War.

In the early 1980s, Revisionist Ernst Zündel began publishing ‘Did Six Million Really Die?’ under his publishing company, at the time, Samisdat. In 1984, Zündel was charged under the Canadian Criminal Code, section 181, of spreading false news. This resulted in two Orwellian trials throughout the 1980s; one in 1985 and a follow-up trial in 1988. This was a landmark case in the battle for freedom of speech in Canada. Unfortunately Zündel was convicted in 1988 and sentenced to 15 months imprisonment by an Ontario court. His conviction was later overturned by the Supreme Court of Canada when the law under which he had been charged, reporting false news, was deemed unconstitutional.

Since then, this book has been published and republished countless times. The version Zündel put out under Samisdat includes an index, bibliography, and a list of errors. Most other editions are fairly bare-bones, including the facsimile text of the pamphlet and nothing more. Copies have gotten much harder to come by in recent times after Amazon had given in to pressure and removed this book from its catalogue. This book was one of the prime victims of the Amazon book burning on March 2017 where dozens of controversial revisionist titles were banned. Two separate editions of this title are available through Patriotic Dissent Books.

The book very clearly delineates that the numbers of Jews who perished during World War II was greatly inflated, there was no clear extermination policy, there were likely no gas chambers, and the myth of Jewish suffering has been promulgated for political and financial gain.

‘Did Six Million Really Die?’ is a good introduction to the world of Holocaust Revisionism. Since its initial release, many superior works have been published on the subject. That being said, this was a very influential work, which will continue to have a life of its own.





Bitchute link


www.renegadetribune.com/did-six-million-really-die/
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust 10 Jun 2020 15:22 #3569

  • Connect Dots
  • Connect Dots's Avatar
  • Online
  • Senior Member
  • 9/11 Truth woke me up.
  • Posts: 1023
  • Likes received: 220
THE RAW DEAL (7 JUNE 2020) WITH MONIKA SCHAEFER

First published at 01:14 UTC on June 9th, 2020.

Jim Fetzer


The Raw Deal (7 June 2020) with Monika Schaefer, who with her brother, Alfred, was convicted in a German court of Holocaust denial where they were not allowed to put up a defense. Anyone who examines the evidence knows that 6,000,000 Jews were not put to death in gas chambers using Zyklon-B. Check out my essay, "The Holocaust Narrative: Politics trumps Science," available on-line, for a summary of the proof. There are good reasons for its being called "The Holohoax".



Bitchute link

(Program begins at 1:00.)
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust 30 Jun 2020 06:22 #3570

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 18907
  • Likes received: 8915
I remember the good old days, when 90+ year olds in nursing homes lived forever. Darn this pesky virus.

1365 = 1

1.1365 = 1,283,305,580,313,352
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust 28 Sep 2020 17:09 #3571

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 17368
  • Likes received: 6312


Holohoaxers Talking Shit


September 27, 2020 renegade



Self-proclaimed Holocaust Survivors and their absurd stories involving shit and piss. Many of these stories were inspired from the latrine scene in the Steven Spielberg film Schindler’s List.




Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust 24 Oct 2020 21:03 #3572

  • Voltaire
  • Voltaire's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 3687
  • Likes received: 2229
the search engine you use can affect results on holohoax (exact term) - startpage which I normally use delivers google algorithmic results - swiss cows and duck duck go are very different - putting revisionist sites in primary positions. there are other engines i havent looked at yet like webcrawler, qwant, yandex and others.

duckduckgo.com/?q=holohoax&t=hk&ia=web&iai=r1-5&page=1&adx=prdsdc&sexp=%7B%22relsexp%22%3A%22b%22%2C%22prodexp%22%3A%22b%22%2C%22prdsdexp%22%3A%22c%22...rexp%22%3A%22b%22%7D


Truth is anti-semitic
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: MrAnderson

The Holocaust 21 Nov 2020 12:58 #3573

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 17368
  • Likes received: 6312


What If The ‘Holocaust’ Revisionists Are Right?


November 20, 2020 Meža Vilks



Holocaust or Hoax?

Chapter IV

by Jürgen Graf

What If The Revisionists Are Right?




Let’s just assume that the official “truth” on the Holocaust is a lie, and that the revisionists are right. The result would be a recognition that there was indeed a persecution of jews under the Third Reich, but no deliberate extermination of the jews; that the gas chambers and gas vans were an invention of atrocity propaganda, just like the children with their hands chopped off during the First World War; that not five to six million, but many less jews died in the areas under German control; that of these jewish victims, only a small percentage were killed, while the rest died chiefly of epidemics and deprivation in the camps and ghettos. What would be the result of this revelation? They are easy to imagine:

– a worldwide wave of anti-jewish feeling;

– a wave of nationalism in Germany: politicians, intellectuals, historians and journalists would be held up to contempt by their own people;

– the renewed possibility of an objective, factual discussion of National Socialism. We might, as a result, even be able to borrow some of their constructive measures in dealing with the problems of unemployment, the declining birth rate, and wide-spread drug addiction;

– nationalism, in the sense of a true representation of national interests and a defence of the national identity, would regain its legitimacy. The Germans could again say, without shame, “Germany for the Germans!” The French could again say, without shame, “France for the French!”. The psychological and political factors which have enabled mass invasion from the Third World, would disappear;

– the rulers and manipulators of public opinion would be discredited, not only in Germany, but throughout the West. People would ask themselves why this whole charade had to be propped up with censorship and brute force for so many decades, and in whose interests. Trust in the ruling cliques would be seriously shaken — at a time of serious social and economic crisis to which the “democracies” have no answer.

We see that a general realization that Holocaust is a lie would have devastating implications, not only for international jewry and the state of Israel, but for the political and intellectual ruling cliques of the entire Western world — particularly in Germany! The result would be an re-evaluation of all values, to borrow a term from Friedrich Nietzche. Everything would be different. Everything would have to re-examined.



WHAT REALLY HAPPENED?

Prior to 1941: The Reichs Government demands jewish emigration



The jewish policies of the NSDAP, from the very outset, aimed at continually reducing jewish influence in Germany and at encouraging as many “German” jews to emigrate as possible. This initial objective was pursued from 1933 onwards by means of numerous laws and decrees which limited the number of jews among lawyers, doctors, etc. by means of quotas, and which restricted the economic and political rights of the jews. This continued, until at least 1938, practically without violence; until the Night of Broken Glass (1), not one jew was ever sent to a camp just for being a jew. If jews were sent to camps, it was for militant anti-governmental political activity or for common crime (2).

To encourage jewish emigration, the National Socialists worked closely with Zionist organizations, which were interested in encouraging the emigration to Palestine of as many jews as possible. This National Socialist-Zionist cooperation has been fully documented by several authors (3), and to our knowledge is not disputed by anyone.

Since the British mandate over Palestine effectively prevented jewish immigration of jews to that country, jewish emigration took place very slowly; the majority of “German” jews preferred other immigration countries, particularly the USA. But the USA also placed obstacles in the path of jewish immigration (4).

By 1941, however, the great majority of “German and Austrian” jews had gone into exile.

After 1941: Mass deportation to camps and ghettos

In 1941, jewish emigration was officially prohibited. This prohibition was not, however, consistently implemented in practice. The deportation of jews to work camps and ghettos began in 1941. This occurred for two reasons in particular: first, the Germans needed their labour, since a majority of German men were at the front. Secondly, the jews indisputably represented a security risk. The jew Arno Lustiger, a former resistance fighter and survivor of several camps, has proudly boasted that jews represented 15% of all active resistance, yet the percentage of jews in the French population at that time was no more than 1%. The Communist “Red Orchestra” espionage organization, which did caused Germany enormous harm, was made up mostly of jews (6).

Other states have interned suspicious minorities with far less justification: thus, in the USA, all persons of Japanese ancestry, even those with American passports, were interned in camps (7). This was done even though there was never a single case of espionage or subversion by Japanese-Americans, as admitted by Ronald Reagan decades later.

The jews in individual German-ruled countries suffered from the deportation to a widely varying extent. Disproportionately hard-hit were the “Dutch” jews, of whom more than two thirds were deported. On the other hand, according to Serge Klarsfeld, only 75,721 jews were deported from France. This corresponds to approximately one fifth of the total jewish population at that time (8); of these, a great many were deported, not on the grounds of their religion or race, but for being resistance fighters or criminals. This often led to deportation for non-jews as well.



The death rate in the camps and its causes


The death rate in the camps was extremely high most of the time. A majority of these fatalities were due to disease. The most dangerous of these was epidemic typhus, a disease carried by lice. The insecticide Zyklon B, together with other products, was used to combat lice.

In Auschwitz, the largest concentration camp — the term “extermination camp” is not the correct expression — epidemic typhus was especially dangerous in late summer and autumn. The epidemic reached its climax between 7-11 September 1942, with an average of 375 inmate deaths a day. By the first half of January 1943, the Germans succeeded in reducing the death rate to 107 a day; but by mid-May, it rose again to 298 fatalities a day (9).

In the Western camps, the worst period was during the final phase of the war, when mass deaths from epidemic disease claimed tens of thousands of victims. At the same time, the German infrastructure totally collapsed as a result of Allied terror bombing, leading to shortages in the camps of medications, food, housing, and everything else. In his memoires, Chuck Yeager, the first pilot to break the sound barrier, describes how his squadron had orders to shoot at everything that moved (10):

“Germany could not so easily be divided into innocent civilians and guilty soldiers. After all, the farmer on his potato patch was feeding German soldiers.”

This means that the resulting starvation was deliberately created by the Allies through their cruel and illegal mass terror bombings; these same Allies then hypocritically set themselves up as judges over the defeated enemy for failing to supply enough food to concentration camp inmates!

Particularly horrible conditions, including thousands of unburied bodies and living skeletons, were found in April 1945 by the British at Bergen-Belsen. These photographs are kept constantly before the public eye in ceaseless propaganda campaigns to this very today. What are the facts?

Belsen Camp commander Josef Kramer repeatedly and vehemently protested to his superiors that new inmates were constantly being sent to the hopelessly overcrowded camp of Belsen; his protests went unheard. Instead of simply abandoning the inmates in the Eastern camps to the Soviets, the National Socialists evacuated them to the West and allocated them among the Western camps to prevent their manpower from falling into the hands of the Soviets. Since the railways had been almost entirely destroyed, the evacuation process often lasted weeks; many inmates died en route from the bitter cold winter weather. In the camps which were compelled to receive the remainder, conditions worsened by the day.

Kramer’s protests went unheard. In Belsen, typhus and dysentery spread everywhere, and food shortages became acute.

What should Kramer have done? Release the inmates to spread epidemics among the civilian population? Who would have fed them then if he had? Should he have released dangerous criminals — who were imprisoned together with other inmates interned for political and racial reasons — to prey upon the population? Kramer decided to wait it out. He could have attempted to escape to South American with money stolen from the prisoners, but he trusted to British “fair play”. He was to pay dearly for his naivete. Branded as “The Beast of Belsen” in the Allied press, he was executed after a legal farce (11).

Disproportionately great numbers of victims died in the last months of the war in the other camps as well. At Dachau, a total of 15,389 people died between January and April 1945, i.e., more deaths in 3 months than in 5 years of war — 12,060 inmate deaths from 1940 to 1944. Another 2,000 died even after the liberation of Dachau by the Americans (12).

Since the Holocaust, i.e., the planned extermination of the jews, is supposed to have stopped in the autumn of 1944 (13), the mass deaths in the camps in 1945 prove nothing with regards to any “mass extermination”. The mass deaths depicted in photographs were the tragic, but inevitable, result of the German collapse, and had nothing to do with any planned genocide — quite in contrast to the Allied bombing war against the German (and Japanese) civilian population. The destruction of one small city like Pforzheim alone, shortly before the end of the war, caused 17,000 deaths (14). More people died in Pforzheim in one February evening in 1945 — most of them burnt alive — than in Dachau in 9 years, from late 1933 to late 1944.

Of course, jews died outside the concentration camps as well. According to one jewish source, a total of 43,411 people died in the ghetto of Lodz between the autumn of 1939 and the autumn of 1944. There were 26,950 recorded fatalities in the Warsaw ghetto even before the outbreak of the uprising (spring 1943) (15). Some of these people, of course, would have died of natural causes (for example, old age) in any case. Other jews died in combat or during the evacuation.


Mass shootings on the Eastern front


Finally, it would never occur to any revisionist to dispute that many jews were shot on the Eastern front. But what exactly is meant by the word “many”? 20,000? 50,000? 100,000?. We do not know, due to the absence of reliable source material. (The Einsatzgruppen reports, which are supposed to prove that millions of murders were committed on the Eastern front, will be discussed below.) These shootings were the inevitable reaction to the murderous, illegal partisan war unleashed by the Soviets behind the German lines. The Germans reacted exactly like the French in Algeria, the Americans in Viet Nam, and the Soviets in Afghanistan: with ruthless brutality, causing many deaths among the civilian population. Of course, partisans were executed (which is permitted by international law); of course, there were also frequent shootings of hostages, involving many more jews than non-jews. Many other jews were killed as “suspected Bolsheviks”, even if they were neither partisans nor hostages — exactly as the Americans, decades later, bombarded “Viet-Cong suspected zones” with napalm, slaughtering innumerable harmless civilians with bestial cruelty in the process.

In the USSR as elsewhere, the jewish percentage of armed partisans far exceeded their percentage share of the population; this fact is stressed with pride in jewish literature (16). The reason why jews in the German occupied areas of the Soviet Union suffered so many deaths was partisan warfare, not racial murder.

To sum up: jews did indeed suffer during the Second World War and did indeed endure losses. But people suffer and die in every war. The 500,000+ people burnt alive or crushed under the rubble of Dresden in a single night suffered too; so did the hundreds of thousands of starving Russians in Stalingrad, or the 180,000 Poles who died in the crushing of the uprising of the Warsaw ghetto. Concentration camp inmates were not the only people who suffered; German and Russian soldiers at the front suffered, too.

Is jewish suffering during WWII “unique”? Are the percentage losses of the jews far higher than those of the other peoples especially hard hit by the war? In order to answer these questions, we must now turn to the proof for the alleged “Holocaust”.


Notes:

1) On the Night of Broken Glass, see, as standard work of the orthodox historiography, H. Graml’s Der 9 November 1938. ‘Reichskristallnacht’, Bonn, 1958, and as the revisionist depiction, see Ingrid Weckert’s Feuerzeichen (Grabert, 1981).

2) That no jew was deported to a concentration camp during the early years of the NS regime, is confirmed by an unimpeachable source, namely the jewish professor Arno Mayer (Der Krieg as Kreuzzug, Rowohlt, 1989, p. 200).

3) The two standard works on the National Socialist-Zionist cooperation are Edwin Black’s The Transfer Argreement (New York/London, 1994), as well as Francis Nicosias’ Hitler und der Zionismus (Druffel, Leoni, 1989). A short summary of the imprortant factors is given by Ingrid Weckert in Auswanderung der Juden aus dem Dritten Reich (Nordwind Verlag, Molevej 12, Kollund/DK). Heinz Hoehne also discusses the topic in his standard work on the SS (Der Orden unter dem Totenkopf, Gondrom, 1990).

4) In this regard, compare Ingrid Weckert, Auswanderung… (see note 3).

5) Spiegel, no. 7/1993.

6) On the “Red Orchestra”, see for example, Gerd Sudholt, Das Geheimnis der Roten Kapelle, Druffel, Leoni, 1979.

7) Historische Tatsachen, no. 41.

8) Serge Klarsfeld, Le Memorial de la Deportation des Juifs de France, Beate Klarsfeld Foundation, Brussels/New York, 1982.

9) On the mortality figures in Auschwitz, see Jean-Claude Pressac, Die Krematorien von Auschwitz, Piper, 1994, p. 193.

10) Chuck Yeager, Yeager: An Autobiography, Bantam Books, New York, 1985, p. 79.

11) On Bergen-Belsen and Josef Kramer, see Journal of Historical Review, Post Office Box 2739, New Port Beach, CA, USA, spring 1995, as well as Robert Lenski, Der Holocaust vor Gericht, Samisdat Publishers, 206 Carlton Street, Toronto, Canada, 1993, p. 197, ff.

12) On the Dachau mortality statistics, see Paul Berben, Dachau, The Official History, The Norfolk Press, London, 1975.

13) According to the Enzyklopaedie des Holocaust (p. 118), the gassings at Auschwitz were stopped in October 1944.

14) Erich Kern, Verbrechen am deutschen Volk, K.W. Schuetz, 1983, p 150/151.

15) Historische Tatsachen, no. 36.

16) Compare the description in the Enzyklopaedie des Holocaust, p. 1584 ff.



www.renegadetribune.com/what-if-the-holocaust-revisionists-are-right/
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust 23 Nov 2020 13:40 #3574

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 17368
  • Likes received: 6312


The Function of the Holocaust in the World Since 1945


November 22, 2020 Meža Vilks



Holocaust or Hoax?

The Function of the Holocaust in the World Since 1945

by Jürgen Graf



The political consequences of the Holocaust were, and are, enormous. Let us look at the most important ones.



The founding of the State of Israel and the violation of Palestinian Rights


Without the Holocaust, the world would never have permitted the founding of the state of Israel in 1948. The colonial era was coming to an end at that time. The British had already decided to give India its independence, while dozens of Asian and African territories were at that point striving to shake off European rule. While other powers were rushing to grant independence to their colonies, the jews in Palestine were permitted to embark upon a colonial adventure par excellence, with the blessings of both the West and the USSR. In so doing, they proceeded with ruthless brutality; whole Arab villages were leveled. A great proportion of the Palestinians were driven from their homeland. In 1967, Israel conquered additional Arab territories, the inhabitants of which remain subject to all possible kinds of repression: deportations, arrests — in 1992, there were 15,000 Palestinians behind bars for political reasons! (1) — liquidation of political opposition by killer commandos, dynamiting of houses, confiscations, endless repression (2). In addition, there is the systematic use of torture, quite unashamedly declared legal by the Israeli Supreme Court on 15 November 1996. In so doing, the jewish state adopted a legal position which remains unique in the world. Israel is, of course, not the only state in the world to practise torture; but it is the only nation which openly claims the right to do so. The right of Israeli military personnel and policemen to torture Palestinian political detainees was justified by the Supreme Court on security considerations: the need to gain “vitally important information on planned attacks”. So why did the Gestapo officer Klaus Barbie in Paris have French resistance fighters tortured, if not on security grounds, and for the purpose of gaining vital information on planned attacks on German soldiers?

Not only may Arabs be tortured and murdered in Israel with impunity — they may even be mocked posthumously. In 1993, two Israeli soldiers shot an unarmed Palestinian during a street confrontation. At first, they were sentenced to one hour’s imprisonment each; this inhumanly heavy sentence was later commuted into a fine of exactly one penny each (3).

Jewish terror rule in Palestine is not actually encouraged by world public opinion, but it is tolerated. After all, the jewish people, after suffering the Holocaust, needed a homeland to protect them from a new genocide; what are the sufferings of the Palestinians compared to those of the jews under Hitler?

Without outside assistance, the state of Israel would never survive for as much a single day. Its chief source of revenue continues to consist of financial injections from the Americans, support from international jewry, and German “reparations”. According to official sources, the BRD had already paid 85.4 billion marks to Israel (and jewish organizations) by 1992 (3); the actual figure must be considerably higher. In addition there have been German deliveries in the form of commodities. Nahum Goldmann, long-time Chairman of the Jewish World Congress, wrote in his book The Jewish Paradox (4):

“Without the German reparations payments that started coming during its first ten years as a state, Israel would not have half of its present infrastructure: all the trains in Israel are German, the ships are German, and the same goes for electrical installations and a great deal of Israel’s industry…”


Immunity of jews from criticism


Before 1945, criticism of jews was allowed. Today, that is no longer the case. Any criticism of jewry and Zionism, no matter how faint-hearted — for example, relating to the relatively heavy influence of jews on the mass media of the Western world, or the arrogance of the Central Jewish Council in Germany — is immediately shouted down with screams about Auschwitz and the Holocaust, with approximately the following logic: anyone who criticizes jews is anti-Semitic; Hitler was anti-Semitic; Hitler killed Six million jews; therefore, anyone who criticizes jews wants to kill another Six Million jews! No matter how stupid and primitive this argument may be, it has proven itself effective right down until the present day.



The effectiveness of the above is demonstrated by a single remarkable example:


The most dangerous criminal organization in the world is regularly called the “Russian mafia” by the mass media. This is a slander on the Russian people, because the mob bosses are not Russian. In a book which the author was forced to call The Russian Mafia — if he had called it The jewish Mafia he would have thrown in jail — the German author Juergen Roth (5) says:

“The cocaine is owned by a drug ring made up overwhelmingly of Israeli nationals — some of them with Russian ancestry — with support points in Colombia, Antwerp, Amsterdam, Tel Aviv, Moskow and St. Petersburg… Mosche Ben-Ari, Ricardo Fanchini, and Rachmiel Brandwain are considered the most powerful bosses of the exile Russian mafia in Europe and the USA.”

Although Roth had to censor many names in his book, it is clear from the context that the bosses of the “Russian Mafia” are almost exclusively jewish. The gangster bosses Rachmiel Brandwain and Mosche Ben-Ari live in Antwerp or Munich. No Belgian or German state prosecutor would ever dare have them arrested, since he would be attacked by the media as a “neo-Nazi”, a pitiless persecutor of “Holocaust survivors”.


Covering up Allied atrocities in WW II


As we have seen, very little is ever said about the horrendous Allied atrocities during WWII. Terror bombings, starvation camps, and expulsions, may, of course, be inhumane, people will say; but the Holocaust was an incomparably greater crime! Anyone guilty of such a crime — i.e., the Germans — has no right to complain of harsh treatment by the Allied victors.


Creating contempt for the German people


Since 1945, the German people have been branded with a mark of shame for an unspeakable crime which makes healthy self-respect impossible for Germans, and prevents any German government from representing German interests in any way. A truly independent German government committed to defending the interests of the German people has not existed since 1945. The DDR was ruled by the satraps of the Eastern occupying powers for decades, while the BRD continues to be ruled by vassals of the Western occupying powers.

Self-respect and patriotism are held in contempt in Germany today; self-criticism and self-hatred are the prevailing trend. Leading intellectuals, the most well-known of whom is Guenter Grass, have expressly opposed the reunification with reference to Auschwitz (6).

Germany’s entry into the Europe of Maastricht, i.e., into a supranational government ruled by an anonymous bureaucracy, is advocated tooth and nail by all the parties represented in the German Bundestag. After the destruction of Germany as a state, the next objective of the ruling classes is the destruction of the German people itself. This is to be achieved through artificially lowering the domestic birth rate by means of laws hostile to the family, by facilitating abortion, as well as by encouraging the mass immigration of people from foreign cultures, most recently from Black Africa.


Rendering impossible any objective discussion of National Socialism


An objective discussion of National Socialism, with its strengths and weaknesses, is simply impossible today. Any mention of the achievements and positive aspects of the National Socialist system — for example, the elimination of unemployment and the economic upswing which set in soon after Hitler’s rise to power — is immediately howled down with screams about Auschwitz.



Creating contempt for all forms of nationalism except jewish nationalism


While the Auschwitz truncheon was first used only on the Germans, it is now directed, to an increasingly greater extent, against all other white nationalities. The argument in this regard runs approximately as follows:


– the world sat by and did nothing while Hitler slaughtered the jews by millions. Neither the Western powers nor the Soviets nor the International Red Cross nor the Vatican denounced the genocide nor attempted to rescue the jews, although they knew just what the “Nazis” were doing. Therefore, the white race as a whole is jointly guilty for the Holocaust;


– since the extermination of the jews was permitted without resistance AT THAT TIME, we must repent for our sins and grant residence to all asylum seekers from foreign cultures TODAY. If we were to send them back to their own countries, they might suffer persecution, torture, and death; we would therefore be guilty again!


– all forms of nationalism (except, of course, jewish nationalism) is therefore highly dangerous, since it all too easily leads to racism, and therefore involves the danger of a new Holocaust. A “nationalist”, of course, is anyone who resists the mass immigration of coloureds and Moslems to Europe and North America.


In practice, the Holocaust means that White nations no longer have the right to their own identity. They have a moral duty to allow themselves to be overrun and displaced. “What, you’re not against immigration, are you? You must be a ‘NAZI!'”



Notes:

1) Weltwoche, 22 October 1992.

2) On the Israeli repression of Arabs, see, for example, Ludwig Watzal, Frieden ohne Gerechtigkeit? Boehlau Verlag, 1994.

3) Nation & Europa, January 1997, p. 34; Rivarol, 6 December 1996, p. 9.

4) Spiegel, no. 18/1992.

5) Nahum Goldmann, Das juedische Paradox, Europaeische Verlagsanstalt, 1978, p. 171.

6) Juergen Roth, Die Russen-Mafia, Rasch und Roehring, Hamburg 1996, p. 263; 269.

7) Guenter Grass, Schreiben nach Auschwitz, Luchterhand, 1990.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust 20 Dec 2020 21:04 #3575

  • lovejoy
  • lovejoy's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Fresh Member
  • Posts: 97
  • Likes received: 85
There are two ways to be fooled
One is to believe what isn't true
the other is to refuse to believe what is true.
Soren Kierkegaard (1813-1855)
Bitcoin-bc1qq9r87uasrxv59hz92zy9t47r96aezdfuqnujfx
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust 20 Dec 2020 21:17 #3576

  • MrAnderson
  • MrAnderson's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Gold Member
  • BOXING FOR PEACE
  • Posts: 5179
  • Likes received: 1905
^^^ I bet even less Americans are aware of Jewish led Bolshevism that led to the death of millions of white christians ^^^
isaiah 47 : 10

10 You felt secure in your wickedness;
you said, “No one sees me”;
your wisdom and your knowledge led you astray,
and you said in your heart,
“I am, and there is no one besides me.”
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust 22 Dec 2020 18:25 #3577

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 17368
  • Likes received: 6312
Last Edit: 22 Dec 2020 18:25 by Flare.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust 29 Dec 2020 23:52 #3578

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 18907
  • Likes received: 8915
GoyimTV Holocaust Banner Drop

I remember the good old days, when 90+ year olds in nursing homes lived forever. Darn this pesky virus.

1365 = 1

1.1365 = 1,283,305,580,313,352
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Flare

The Holocaust 30 Dec 2020 12:36 #3579

  • Frothy
  • Frothy's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Released
  • Posts: 17862
  • Likes received: 1854
There's 195 countries in the world so the Jews aren't making a good job of banning holocaust denial after all eh?

Anyway....

History of laws agaings Holocaust denial
Therefore, it comes as no surprise that in 1960 the first law against Holocaust denial was passed as a reaction to the re-emerging anti-Semitism in German society: On Christmas Eve 1959, just a couple of months after its widely celebrated re-opening, the synagogue in Cologne was besmeared with swastikas and anti-Semitic slurs by two members of a right-extremist party. In the following months an entire wave of anti-Semitic acts swept over Germany. The administration of chancellor Konrad Adenauer (CDU: Christian Democratic Union) saw itself under considerable pressure to act and therefore decided to pass a law against ‘incitement’ (Volksverhetzung). The purpose of this law was to, among other things, make the denial of Nazi crimes against Jews a crime. The mind-set of the deniers was seen as the foundational myth of new forms of anti-Semitism that focused on the state of Israel and its alleged moral blackmailing of the German state based on the – in the eyes of these anti-Semites – ‘historical lie’ of the Holocaust. Once passed however, the law was never really used to sentence Holocaust deniers as the judicial qualifications necessary for a conviction were set very high. Furthermore, the German judicial system was still full of officials who started their careers in the Third Reich and in most cases were not willing to really confront their, and their country’s past. That does not necessarily mean that they still held on to their old beliefs – even though that could be found too – but they were very reluctant to address the topic of Vergangenheitsbewältigung (the process of coming to terms with one’s past) and therefor bring charges against Holocaust deniers.



smartergerman.com/blog/holocaust-denial-crime-germany/
Jews LARPing as Nazis
Last Edit: 30 Dec 2020 13:22 by Frothy.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust 30 Dec 2020 13:33 #3580

  • Lux Interior
  • Lux Interior's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Do you know de way?
  • Posts: 4572
  • Likes received: 1332
You should be permitted to believe what you want, thought crime isn't legal statute (yet).
Truth doesn't fear questioning, the fact that this fraud cannot be mentioned speaks for itself. Parallels abound, this Covid scam being one example, Dominion fraud being another.
Q. E. D.
I repeat, truth doesn't fear questioning and if you ban debate you have something to hide.
liberabo te ab inferno

875 020 079

He cried in a whisper at some image, at some vision—he cried out twice, a cry that was no more than a breath: "'The horror!
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Related topics

Topic subjectRelevanceDate of latest post
The Holocaust: What A LIE!5.15Monday, 06 January 2020
21 more questions regarding the holocaust5.09Saturday, 03 February 2018
[excerpt of] The Holocaust5.09Sunday, 16 October 2016
Holocaust Deniers: Why Would They Lie.5.09Monday, 12 October 2015
MH17 & The Holocaust5.09Wednesday, 23 March 2016
why can't anyone talk about the holocaust?5.09Sunday, 26 March 2017
Holocaust Update ..5.09Friday, 16 October 2020
How Holocaust Denial Works5.04Saturday, 13 January 2018
The Holocaust Cult, Revisited.5.04Saturday, 13 August 2016
1st World War, 1st Christian Holocaust5.04Monday, 29 February 2016
Moderators: novum, rodin, Flare
Powered by Kunena Forum

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2020 - May 2021, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 250 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 192 - Raised
( £ 140 GBP )
donation thermometer
56%
Most Recent Donation $122 USD
4th January 2021
Bitcoin Address: bc1q0kazqya0nurfxtunxv807vm0m8852nnrrk8mj8
 
Ethereum Address: 0xe69915c80dd75df19f438d556267e04f932f057d
 
More Info: Donation options for TZ
 

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.