Your donations are appreciated and help keep this site running. Even the smallest amount helps.
Thankyou

 
PROMOTE YOUR SITE
HERE
Only $3 USD/month
TRUTHSPOON.COM
The man they can't recruit!
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2

TOPIC: What if everything you were taught about World War I was a lie as well?

What if everything you were taught about World War I was a lie as well? 28 Nov 2014 17:34 #1

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960
Extension of

What if everything you were taught about World War II was a lie?

inspired by


Oracle wrote:







World War I: Britain’s Share of Guilt

Ten Lies Told about World War I






NOTICE TO THE ‘THOUGHT POLICE’
I claim the following rights: CANADA: Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication; (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and (d) freedom of association. and Bill Of Rights (1960) 1. (d) freedom of speech; (e) freedom of assembly and association; and (f) freedom of the press. USA: The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights. The amendment prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances. INTERNATIONAL: Article 19 of the UN Human Rights Charter explicitly states: "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers." GOD: I believe in God, the Creator all life, who gave mankind the gift of thought, belief, opinion and the means of expression. It is not the private domain of any class, group, gender, religion, culture, nation or race. I respect and defend everyone's right to free thought, belief and freedom of expression as a basic right of humanity (whether I agree or disagree with them) without which, we are no longer free, indeed, no longer human. Thus I expect the same respect. J4G

.
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 28 Nov 2014 23:43 by PFIZIPFEI.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Return of Zorro

What if everything you were taught about World War I was a lie as well? 29 Nov 2014 14:36 #2

It's good to see J4G posting again on his blog. He's one of the best out there for posting easily digestible and understandable essays..
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. – Marcus Aurelius
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: PFIZIPFEI

What if everything you were taught about World War I was a lie as well? 30 Nov 2014 11:10 #3

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960

Dominic Alexander debunks Ten Myths used to Justify the Slaughter of the First World War



Ten Lies Told about World War I



This Remembrance Day will doubtless see strenuous efforts by some to justify the fruitless bloodbath that was the First World War. Revisionist commentators have long attempted to rehabilitate the conflict as necessary and just, but the arguments do not stand up. It does no service to the memory of the dead to allow any illusions in the justice or necessity of war, particularly so when the precedents will be used to argue for the next ‘necessary’ conflict. From the causes of the war, to its prosecution and its results, here are the counter-arguments to ten common pro-war ploys.



An American soldier lies dead, tangled in barbed wire on the western front. Photograph: American Stock Archive/GettyImages



1. The war was fought in defence of democracy.

This is contradicted by the basic facts. Germany had universal manhood suffrage while in Britain, including Ireland, some 40% of men still did not qualify for the vote. In Germany also, there were attempts to justify the war on the grounds that it was being fought to defend civilised values against a repressive, militaristic state, in the form of Russian autocracy.


2. Britain went to war due to a treaty obligation to defend the neutrality of Belgium.

There was no clear and accepted obligation on Britain to do this, and, in fact, before the Belgian issue appeared, the war party in the cabinet was already pushing for British intervention on the entirely different ground that there were naval obligations to France. These obligations had been developed in secret arrangements between the military of both countries, and were never subject to any kind of democratic accountability. The Germans even offered guarantees over Belgian integrity, which the British government refused to consider at all.


3. German aggression was the driving force for war.


However aggressive the German leadership may have been in 1914, the British establishment was at least as determined to take the opportunity to go to war with its imperial rival. At one point the Foreign Office even seized on imaginary German incursions into France to justify a British declaration of war on Germany. The declaration letter had to be retrieved from the German ambassador and rewritten when it was discovered that the stories were false. The enthusiasm of the British ruling class for war undermines any justification for it based on German aggression.


4. Germany had started a naval arms race with Britain.

Imperialist competition between the two states over markets and resources preceded the arms race in the fifteen years before the war. Britain’s naval power was the vital element in its ability to restrict German access to markets and resources across the world. Unless Britain was willing to allow Germany to expand economically, the logic of capitalist competition meant that Germany was bound to challenge British naval supremacy. The latent violence of the leading imperial nation is always the context for aggressive challenges to the status quo on the part of rising powers.


5. German imperialism was uniquely vicious and had to be challenged.

The atrocities committed against the Herrero people in Namibia were indeed terrible crimes, but were hardly unique compared to the horrors committed by all those involved in the rubber industry in the Belgian Congo, to take but one example. Also, European opinion had only a few years before 1914 been horrified by the brutality of another colonial power when it was engaged in ruthlessly expanding its dominance over independent states in Africa. This was Britain in its wars of aggression against the Boer states in South Africa, during which concentration camps were first used in order to control a civilian population.


6. Public opinion was united in favour of the war, as shown by images of cheering crowds in 1914.

It is now usually admitted that the degree of enthusiasm for the war was strictly limited, and the evidence is that the crowds who gathered at the outbreak of war were by no means united in martial enthusiasm. In fact sizeable and widespread anti-war demonstrations occurred in both Britain and Germany. Had the leaderships of Labour and Socialist parties across Europe not caved into demands to support their national ruling classes in going to war, it is quite possible that the conflict could have been stopped in its tracks.


7. The morale of British troops fighting on the Western Front remained intact to the end of the war.

While Britain may not have suffered quite the same scale of mutinies as in the German and French armies, at times there were whole stretches of the front where troops became so unreliable that generals did not dare order them into combat. The evidence for widespread cynicism about war strategies, contempt for the military leadership, and grave doubts about the purpose of the war, cannot be wished away by the revisionists. In so far as soldiers carried on willingly fighting the war, the explanation needs to be sought in the habituation to obedience, as well as the threat of court-martial executions. There is no need to invoke either fervid nationalism or any kind of deep psychological blood-lust as explanations.


8. The military leadership, notably General Haig, was not a bunch of incompetent ‘donkeys’.

Attempts to rehabilitate the likes of General Haig founder on some of the basic facts about the tactics he relentlessly employed. Repeated infantry attacks on opposing trenches consistently failed to gain any clear advantage, while causing colossal casualties. On the first day of the battle of the Somme, 1st July 1916, 57,000 troops out of 120,000 were killed or wounded. Despite continuing carnage on an incredible scale, Haig carried on ordering further attacks. When any hope of a breakthrough against the German lines was clearly lost, the purpose of the battle was shifted to attrition pure and simple. The plan now was to kill more German troops than the British lost. Since there was no way of reliably measuring the casualties on the other side, Haig relied on estimating it through the losses of his own side. On this basis he began to be angered when the army suffered too few losses, as when he complained that one division in September had lost under a thousand men. There can be no defence for this kind of disregard of human life.


9. The end of the war saw the triumph of liberal capitalism, against collapsing autocratic Empires.

In fact all states involved in the war were deeply destabilised. Even the United States, whose involvement was the most limited, experienced the ‘Red Summer’ of 1919, with unprecedented labour revolts, such as the Seattle general strike, alongside savage repression of socialists and black Americans. Britain saw the beginning of the Irish war of independence, and increasing unrest in India, which marks, in effect, the point at which the Empire began to unravel. Domestically, there was also a wave of radical working-class unrest, particularly in the ‘Red Clydeside’, which culminated in troops being sent into Glasgow to impose martial law.


10. The war achieved anything worthwhile whatsoever.

The war opened up a period of endemic economic dislocation, and outright crisis. In Britain there was a decade of industrial decline and high unemployment even before the Great Depression.

In effect, it was only the Second World War which brought the major capitalist powers out of the slump. The First World War saw the point at which capitalism became addicted to war and to a permanent arms economy.

The war demonstrated the capacity of capitalism to create industrialised waste, carnage and destruction on a colossal scale. The remembrance of the war is appropriately a time for mourning the horror, the loss and the waste of it all, but it should also provoke a determination to resist our rulers’ insistence on promoting war to further their interests. War can achieve nothing other than to create the conditions for further wars.

Popular opinion has, ever since its ending, remembered the First World War as a time of horrendous and futile misery and slaughter, as epitomising political and military leaders’ incompetence and callous disregard for human life. That popular judgement, which has helped turn common opinion against war in general, was correct, and we must not let the war mongers dismiss this instance of the wisdom of ordinary people.


[Emphasis added]

***

Dominic Alexander is a member of Counterfire, for which he is the book review editor. He has been a Stop the War and anti-austerity activist in north London for some time. He is a published historian whose work includes the book Saints and Animals in the Middle Ages, a social history of medieval wonder tales


SOURCE: www.counterfire.org/history/17511-ten-lies-told-about-world-war-i

My Comment: Obviously I enjoyed the article and agree. I think most informed and rational thinking people would. It is interesting to note, however, that with respect to WWI, the “revisionists” are those who are trying to re-establish the already long discredited ‘official version’ and legacy of that Not So Great War, as it was originally sold to the masses, though with shiny new wrapping paper. In other words, that those “evil nasty Germans were to blame”. Repeat as necessary.

With respect to WWII, however, the “revisionists” are those of us who have re-investigated the ‘official version’ as presented (or invented) by the Victors and their lackeys, and who have been bringing forward evidence which contradicts and often fully discredits their narrative. And it is precisely that false narrative which has been used and recycled ever since the end of WWII right up to the present day, in order to justify virtually every new war which those same “capitalists” desire.

Lest we forget …. (or in case you didn’t know) National Socialism was “Socialist”. Truly socialist, and neither Marxist nor Capitalist. It was the only model which ever worked to the benefit of both the wealthy industrialists and entrepreneurial class, and the workers. Germany did not recover and prosper as a result of re-arming, but rather, by building civilian infrastructure and services, strengthening agriculture, cottage industries, auto-manufacturing, new industries with scientific and technological advancements, as well as, sound environmental protection policies and land reclamation projects, as well as, recycling to severely reduce reliance upon imports and exports, and the need for territorial expansion and the theft of other nation’s resources.

It also did not come by stealing property from the rich (not even the Jews) in order to give to the poor, or by overly taxing the rich, but rather, through social reforms and benefits for the working class, which achieved a fair and equitable balance that benefited the whole German nation, making her prosperous, and the envy of all.

The World Wide Jewish inspired boycott of Germany in 1933 did indeed cause severe hardship. Germany also had no gold reserves and was burdened with incredible debt, mainly due to war reparations. But putting Germans back into positions of control and influence, combined with German ingenuity, banking and monetary reform, restrictions on stock markets, a strong work ethic, and brotherly love in the true Christian spirit helped Germany to not only survive the hardships, but to thrive, whilst all other industrialized nations lagged behind in economic depression. Their own economic state following the Great Depression was naturally made worse by the boycott of German goods, as it hindered global trade which their own model relied upon. Rather than emulating the German model in some form in order to help themselves out of their economic woes, the western capitalist war mongers, the Bankster Gangsters, and their political puppets created the necessity and desire for war, and they began re-arming, and even helped the Soviet Communists to do the same. So while the Germans planted a plentiful harvest for themselves, the western war mongers (including Jews who had left Germany when they lost their advantaged positions) were sewing the seeds of hate and plotting the destruction of a truly Christian nation.

The ALL LIES had the motive for war. They only needed a pretext and the opportunity. Germany had no need or desire for a war, as Hitler had made clear beginning with his first speech as Chancellor and in many well documented diplomatic exchanges. “Oh, but Hitler re-armed too!” some will say. Obviously, to maintain her own sovereignty, Germany had to re-arm to the degree necessary to protect her own interests and territory from foreign aggression, beginning in about 1936, but by 1939 was largely self-sufficient and had enough trading partners to provide other essential goods. She had also made every possible effort to avoid a war with Poland through generous concessions concerning Danzig, as is also well documented. It was the ALL LIES, through their guarantees to Poland which incited the Poles, not only to intransigence, but indeed, to Anti-German hostility and gross human rights violations including mass murder (which the world chose to ignore) which led to Germany’s declaration of war, thereby, providing the western war mongers with their much desired pretext and opportunity to attack Germany.

To those who scream “but you forgot the Holocaust!” May I remind you that the first casualty of war is truth. May I also remind you that there are two sides to every story. I have previously covered virtually every aspect of World War II from the previously untold German perspective, including many documents, speeches, films, books, as well as, articles and talks from notable, trained and honest non-German historians. I also have provided a virtual library of free books in my links section, as well as, an Amazon affiliate book store full of credible and well sourced books that tell a completely different version of Hitler, National Socialism and World War II than has hitherto been peddled to the masses through the mass media, and in the indoctrination camps called “schools” and “universities”. I have barely even scratched the surface concerning Allied War Crimes committed both during and after the war. Believe me, I know the orthodox victors history all too well! Do you know the other side? Do you even have the courage to look?

My challenge to you, is for you to examine all of the material I have presented from start to finish, and then tell me whether or not you still believe what you have been taught, sold and had instilled in you. Then, maybe we can have a sane and rational discussion about the crimes for which the Germans were accused and found guilty of in an international Kangaroo court called the IMT, who ran it, and about the types of evidence they considered and admitted. Then you tell me what you believe, or still want to believe.

~ J4G


justice4germans.com/2014/11/26/dominic-alexander-debunks-ten-myths-used-to-justify-the-slaughter-of-the-first-world-war/
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 30 Nov 2014 11:16 by PFIZIPFEI.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Return of Zorro, Lux Interior

What if everything you were taught about World War I was a lie as well? 02 Dec 2014 17:38 #4

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960

World War I: Britain’s Share of Guilt



by Andreas van de Kamp




For mainstream historians Britain’s declaration of war to Germany a hundred years ago was driven by dire necessity. But two recently published books are critical of this notion. The first one posits, that the war was indeed consequence of the conscious encirclement of Germany; a move that was executed by Whitehall, but masterminded by a shadowy elite in the UK. The second book does not share this point of view, but maintains that the British entry to the War was no forgone conclusion at all.

100 years after the starting shot for the XX century, hundreds of books have been published and no one still is paying attention to Article 231 of the Versailles Treaty, which was a political fabrication from the start.

“The Allied and Associated Governments affirm and Germany accepts the responsibility of Germany and her allies for causing all the loss and damage to which the Allied and Associated Governments and their nationals have been subjected as a consequence of the war imposed upon them by the aggression of Germany and her allies.”

Most of today’s observers have come to rather nuanced conclusions. In their view the war was result of an exceedingly complex situation. And while each and any of the European powers had contributed to such an instable system not one of them was able to manage it. Christopher Clarks “Sleepwalkers” illustrates this line of thinking.

Gerry Docherty und James Macgregor try to draw a different picture. In their “Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War” they say, that a certain faction of Britain’s upper class is to blame. In essence Docherty and MacGregor concur with the so called encirclement doctrine, which became popular in Germany beginning in 1907 – and again after the German surrender in 1918 and the horrible consequences of the defeat.

Of course Docherty and Macgregor, both Scotsmen, do not have to rely on the word of German leaders, who after the war had every motive to deflect attention from themselves. They try to make sense of what has been unearthed during the last 100 years. That is the strongest point of the book. The weakest point is, that they are not able to produce something like a “smoking gun” for their main argument. Theirs is a new and old narrative of what had been happening before the start of the war. In this regard, it does not differ from the accounts, which are given by the mainstream historians. Much of their narrative can’t be referenced either.

The secret elite came into being during the last 20 years of the 19th century. It was an offspring of the traditional English upper class, mainly consisting of aristocrats, manufacturers and top level civil servants. Caroll Quigley, an American history professor, calls the clique in question “Milner group”, after one of the trustees for Cecil Rhode’s legacy. Cecil Rhodes and Lord Salisbury were the “departure points”, from where the band had started out. Both of them died after the turn of the century. They cannot be counted as players in the years leading up to 1914.

The Milner group in itself for sure has to be considered. Writes Quigley: “To be sure, this secret society is not a childish thing like the Ku Klux Klan, and it does not have any secret robes, secret handclasps, or secret passwords. It does not need any of these, since its members know each other intimately.”


The conspirators must have become convinced that their own business, even the very existence of the British Empire, was endangered by Berlin. That’s why they ushered in a long term policy to isolate and destroy their continental enemy No. 1.

After a landslide election defeat in 1906 the Tories, to which the Milner group had a natural leaning, lost power. But for various reasons this did not affect the political clout of the cabal.

Although almost all members of the bloc had been conservatives, the “chief exceptions were the four leaders of the Liberal Party after Gladstone, who were strong imperialists: Rosebery, Asquith, Edward Grey, and Haldane. These four supported the Boer War, grew increasingly anti-German, supported the World War in 1914, and were close to the Milner Group politically, intellectually, and socially.”

So ironically whig governments turned out to be the ones, that let Britain side with detested czarist Russia. They prepared the war against the central powers. To conceal that to Liberal MPs, his political base, Grey had to resort to permanent obfuscation and disinformation. The crucial year came in 1907, when a British-Russian convention was signed, thereby giving birth to the Triple Entente. This change of sea was accompanied by Alaxander Isvolsky on the Russian side, whom Docherty and Macgregor suspect to have been an asset of their hidden élite.

“The growth of national resentments across the Balkans against Turkey and Austria-Hungary”, they write, ” was deliberately stirred by the agents of the Secret Elite”.

“Serbia was groomed for a very special role. She was perfectly placed as the epicentre for a seismic explosion, that would blow away the old order.”

“(But) As far as the secret elite was concerned, the raison d’etre for the Balkan crisis was to get Austria to react to severe provocation in order to draw Germany in. It was about Germany. It had always been about Germany.”


In the previous crises in the Balkans and North Africa Germany had reacted in a rather defensive mode and the only blame that could be attached to Berlin in July 1914 was, that it did not urge more restraint from Austria Hungary. But Germany’s Geo-strategic position was already set at this point in time and could not have been altered.

This angle is very much contrary to what German students were told in high school and the opposite of what their mainstream professional historians have taught (at least after Fritz Fischer’s Germany’s aims in the First World War in 1961).*

Douglas Newton, the author of the second book, is not an academic outsider like the Scotsmen, but he is not English either. He is Australian and he is much more mainstream than Docherty/Macgregor. His recently published “Darkest Days” deals with what happened in London the week before the British declaration of war in London. Newton doubts that the UK had no choice but to enter the war.

He concentrates on how the war party in the Asquith government managed to have its will, although many Liberal MPs objected to a war.

“The minority of Cabinet interventionists eventually ‘jockeyed’ the neutralist majority into a rushed choice for war on Sunday 2. August, in the shape of a pledge of naval assistance to France. The pledge locked Britain into any war before news of the German ultimatum to Belgium.”

“Throughout the crisis, the Cabinet’s pro-Entente leaders were manipulative and deceptive. They made crucial decisions outside the Cabinet, which steered the neutralist majority toward war. There was no democratic decision for war.”


But neither Asquith’s deception tactics during the July crisis nor the (un)democratic character of its decision are at the core of the issue. The English politicians might have acted hesitantly then and they might have squandered opportunities to preserve peace in doing so.

But all in all London cannot be blamed to have jumped the gun or to have acted as a fire accelerant – not in July 1914. Of course the same can be said of Kaiser Wilhelm and his chancellor Bethmann Hollweg at the time.

This is true, although there had been powerful lobbies both in England and Germany, pushing their respective country onto a path to war.

It was prior to July 1914, that Asquith, Haldane, Churchill, Grey and Lloyd George had been at the service of the war party in UK: by their massive naval rearmament (which, admittedly, can be seen as a response to German action); by their plans to strangle Germany by a naval blockade, by the creation of an expeditionary force and their secret diplomacy with France and Russia, as well as their help in corrupting the Belgian neutrality. The whole Triple Entente was not a defensive scheme to boot.

One can regard this as the natural foreign policy of Liberal imperialists. Or you can concur with Docherty/Macgregor in saying, that those politicians had helped in fulfilling the wish of an all powerful secret group, the destruction of a competing world power by all means necessary.

***

Andreas van de Kamp is an independent Journalist

SOURCE: staatsstreich.at/world-war-i-britains-share-of-guilt.html

* Indeed, to this day, school children in occupied Germany are indoctrinated to believe the long discredited view that World War I was entirely due to “German aggression”. When asked, many balk at the notion that it could have been anything else. They will tell you that you must be crazy.

Why this indoctrination? Because it otherwise may lead them to question German guilt with respect to World War II (and everything else under the sun). That is strictly “VERBOTEN!”




justice4germans.com/2014/11/27/world-war-i-britains-share-of-guilt/
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

What if everything you were taught about World War I was a lie as well? 27 Dec 2014 19:37 #5

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960


Germany's Peace Terms during WW1 (1916)



Adelaide newspaper ("The Advertiser") reveals that the aggressors were Great Britain and her allies. This can be read in "Peace Note to Neutrals" by Germany.

All of Germany's peace offers were rejected by Great Britain. It was Great Britain who continued World War 1 against Germany and later drove America into War against Germany.

There are three newspapers. Here is the information of the newspapers.

1) The Advertiser (Adelaide, SA : 1889 - 1931), 14 December 1916, page 7, 9.

2) The Brisbane Courier, October 5 1916, page 7.


More information about this can be heard through Benjamin Freedman's speech which is available here.
archive.org/details/BenjaminFreedmanWarnsAmericaIn1961WillardHotel2HoursVersion

If you are interested in the "actual" truth about Adolf Hitler, Holocaust, and WW2, then the documentary "Adolf Hitler: the greatest story never told" will show you the truth. The documentary is available here -

archive.org/details/AdolfHitlerTheGreatestStoryNEVERToldParts127TGSNTtvYouTubeviaTorchbrowser.com



There is also a pdf file along with newspapers which shows the text of German Chancellor Theobald von Bethmann-Hollweg on the Prospect of War with the U.S., April 1917. This text reveals that Germany never had the slightest intention of attacking the United States of America. This text also reveals that it was Great Britain who were the aggressors moving against Germany and her Allies, Great Britain rejected the peace offers of Germany, and Great Britain intensified their illegal and indefensible policy of blockade. But the newspapers and the politicians in England and America promoted the lie that Germans were aggressors in order for US to deceptively enter into World War 1 against Germany and her Allies so that Britain can allow Jews to have Palestine by creating phony Balfour Declaration which is mentioned in Benjamin Freedman's speech.


It is also believed that Rasputin (a close advisor to Queen Alexandra - Wife of Czar Nicholas II) was murdered by Great Britain, because Rasputin wanted peace between Great Britain's ally Russia and Germany. Here is a small video about it.





3) Another pdf file is American newspaper "Chicago Tribune"(on December 13, 1916) which shows Germany's peace terms which was sent to Great Britain. In "Chicago Daily Tribune" (December 13, 1916), it is revealed that Germany also sent peace offers to United States in order to end World War 1 and Germany even asked for Pope's Aid to join with Neutral Powers for European peace. But the newspaper (Chicago Tribune, December 13, 1916) also reveals that Great Britain rejected the peace offers of Germany.

Here is also some hidden information about the sinking of Lusitania - en.metapedia.org/wiki/The_Sinking_of_Lusitania



Source archive.org/details/AdelaideNewspaperDecember141916GermanysPeaceTerms
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 29 Dec 2014 09:38 by PFIZIPFEI.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Return of Zorro

What if everything you were taught about World War I was a lie as well? 22 Jan 2015 11:33 #6

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960
I only happened to come across this thread now:


Word War 1 - The Great War Thread

truth-zone.net/forum/history/63828-world-war-1-the-great-war-thread.html

.
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

What if everything you were taught about World War I was a lie as well? 04 Nov 2015 20:42 #7

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

What if everything you were taught about World War I was a lie as well? 04 Feb 2016 22:34 #8

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960
KoreBolt wrote:
I was shown this video about WW1 yesterday by somebody on this forum... and thought we could start a separate thread about WW1 in general. Anyway here is the video... I forgot who shared it on here... but thank you. :)

truth-zone.net/forum/history/63828-world-war-1-the-great-war-thread.html#113899




"History" like we are taught from childhood on in schools and universities
is as botched and distorted, as is the view of our world, allegedly "proven"
by highly acclaimed system stooges, for one reason only: keeping the slaves
dumb and down.

.
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

What if everything you were taught about World War I was a lie as well? 21 Feb 2016 14:35 #9

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960
History does NOT repeat itself.

The uncreative ptb just never change their winning tactics
.... which might be their nemesis, rather sooner than later.




CHAIN REACTION SETS EUROPE ON FIRE




Video description:
Part 2 - CHAIN REACTION SETS EUROPE ON FIRE – Conspiracy and murder - the main causes which led to the First World War...

To kick off their long awaited, pre-planned World War, the New World Order uses "Serbian Nationalists.” A secret society known as Young Bosnia , possibly working with The Young Turks, plots the murder of an Austrian Royal.

Serbia is an Orthodox Christian nation under the protection of Russia. Due to Disraeli's past schemes, many Serbs also live under Austro-Hungarian rule (in Bosnia) instead of under Serbian or Russian sovereignty. This situation has always caused friction, both within Austria-Hungary, and also between Russia and Austria-Hungary.

Archduke Franz Ferdinand is heir to the Habsburg Family throne of Austria-Hungary. While traveling through the Bosnian city of Sarajevo with his wife Sophie, a bomb is thrown at the Archduke's open car. He deflects the bomb with his arm and it explodes behind him. The royal couple insists on seeing all those injured at the hospital. After traveling there, they decide to go to the palace, but their driver takes a wrong turn onto a side street, where another assassin named GavriloPrincip spots them. He shoots Sophie in the stomach and Franz in the neck. Franz is still alive when witnesses arrive to give aid. His dying words to Sophie are, "Don't die darling. Live for our children."

POST ASSASSINATION CHAIN- REACTION SETS EUROPE ON FIRE

JUNE 29
Anti-Serbian riots erupt in the Austro-Hungarian city of Sarajevo (Bosnia).
JULY 7
Austria-Hungary convenes a Council of Ministers to discuss the situation.
JULY
The Zionist Austro-Hungarian press fans the flames of anti-Serbian sentiment. False reports of a Serbian conspiracy are circulated.
JULY
Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany attempts to restrain his Austro-Hungarian ally by encouraging Austria-Hungary to engage in talks with Serbia.
JULY 28
Austria-Hungary gives in to war hysteria and declares war on Serbia.
JULY 29
To defend its Serbian ally, Russia mobilizes it armies against its former ‘Three Emperors League’ ally Austria-Hungary.
AUGUST 1
The Triple Alliance / Triple Entente time bomb is now triggered. Germany declares war on Russia for its mobilization against its ally Austria-Hungary.
AUGUST 1
Ignoring German pleas to not enter the conflict, France begins advancing towards Austria-Hungary in support of its Entente ally, Russia.
AUGUST 3
Facing the dangerous 2-front war that France & England had engineered, (and that Bismarck had feared) Germany quickly advances towards France, through Belgium, while at the same time confronting Russia in the east.
AUGUST 4
Great Britain enters the war on the side of its allies, France and Russia.
SEPTEMBER 5
London Agreement: Triple Entente allies France, Russia, & UK agree that no member shall make separate peace with Germany or Austria-Hungary.
OCTOBER 28
Russia’s southern rival, the Ottoman Turkish Empire, enters the war on the side of Austria-Hungary and Germany.


In just a few weeks’ time, Europe is now aflame in war as the Globalist-Zionist press in France, England, Austria, and Germany whip up a mutually destructive nationalist fervor among the European nations.






First World War




Video description:
Part 3 - First World War; Surrounded by The Great Powers of The Triple Entente, peaceful Germany was forced to advance in two directions.

The sinking of Lusitania, Germany offers peace treaties but these are rejected, and reason are the Zionist Trap; the Balfour declaration, America enters the war, Russian Jews Bolshevik Revolution, German lost the war - The stab in the back …

NOVEMBER 1917 / BRITAIN ISSUES ‘THE BALFOUR DECLARATION’ TO BARON WALTER ROTHSCHILD

The Zionists have delivered on their end of the dirty deal made with the British in 1916. American entry into the war was delivered as promised. By formally, and publicly, issuing “The Balfour Declaration”, Lord Balfour is assuring the Zionists that Britain will fulfill its end of the deal after the war– the theft of Palestine!

The Declaration is delivered to the ‘Baron’ Walter Rothschild. It reads as follows: “His Majesty's government views with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object.”

This is one of the main reasons why the senseless war was kept going, and why America was finally dragged in! In Israel today, Balfour Day (November 2nd) is widely celebrated. The Arabs observe it as a day of mourning.

The Reds can’t fight a civil war at home and an external war at the same time. Lenin and Trotsky have no choice but to take Russia out of the war. Germany then diverts its troops from the east and stages a major western offensive. The operation begins in March with an attack on UK forces in France. The Germans advance 40 miles. Paris is just 75 miles away! The Spring Offensive is so successful that Wilhelm declares March 24 a National Holiday. At this a critical point, Marxists & Zionists in Germany stab their countrymen in the back.Marxist Trade Union leaders order factory strikes which deprive German troops of critical supplies.

The Jewish owned press, which had fanned war passions in 1914, suddenly turns sour on the war and begins ripping on the German military. German morale begins to fall quickly, as does industrial output. Recent recruits arrive at the frontline with a defeatist attitude as anti-war protests and general discontent spread throughout Germany. The Great Offensive comes to a halt as the Americans begin to arrive. German Zionists are betraying Germany so that Palestine can be taken from Germany's Turkish ally and given to the Jews (Balfour Declaration). German Jewish Marxists and "Democratic Socialists" also see a German defeat as a means to destabilize the nation and stage a revolution.

After the war, the treasonous betrayal of 1918 becomes known as "The Stab-in-the-Back." Modern liberal "historians" dismiss this as "legend", but there is nothing mythical about it. On the brink of final victory, Germany was betrayed from within - plain & simple!

"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

What if everything you were taught about World War I was a lie as well? 04 Jul 2016 16:11 #10

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960
@Flare
You asked about a WWI thread.


.
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

What if everything you were taught about World War I was a lie as well? 04 Jul 2016 16:50 #11

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 14332
  • Likes received: 5565
PFIZIPFEI wrote:
@Flare
You asked about a WWI thread.


.

Myea, could be a good one I thought.

Altho those 2 vids tell a lot already of course.... but shall I start one?
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

What if everything you were taught about World War I was a lie as well? 04 Jul 2016 17:14 #12

  • Orangeaid
  • Orangeaid's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 11638
  • Likes received: 8004
Dominic Alexander debunks ten myths used to justify the slaughter of the First World War

This Remembrance Day will doubtless see strenuous efforts by some to justify the fruitless bloodbath that was the First World War. Revisionist commentators have long attempted to rehabilitate the conflict as necessary and just, but the arguments do not stand up. It does no service to the memory of the dead to allow any illusions in the justice or necessity of war, particularly so when the precedents will be used to argue for the next ‘necessary’ conflict. From the causes of the war, to its prosecution and its results, here are the counter-arguments to ten common pro-war ploys.

1 The war was fought in defence of democracy.

This is contradicted by the basic facts. Germany had universal manhood suffrage while in Britain, including Ireland, some 40% of men still did not qualify for the vote. In Germany also, there were attempts to justify the war on the grounds that it was being fought to defend civilised values against a repressive, militaristic state, in the form of Russian autocracy.

2 Britain went to war due to a treaty obligation to defend the neutrality of Belgium.

There was no clear and accepted obligation on Britain to do this, and, in fact, before the Belgian issue appeared, the war party in the cabinet was already pushing for British intervention on the entirely different ground that there were naval obligations to France. These obligations had been developed in secret arrangements between the military of both countries, and were never subject to any kind of democratic accountability. The Germans even offered guarantees over Belgian integrity, which the British government refused to consider at all.

3 German aggression was the driving force for war.

However aggressive the German leadership may have been in 1914, the British establishment was at least as determined to take the opportunity to go to war with its imperial rival. At one point the Foreign Office even seized on imaginary German incursions into France to justify a British declaration of war on Germany. The declaration letter had to be retrieved from the German ambassador and rewritten when it was discovered that the stories were false. The enthusiasm of the British ruling class for war undermines any justification for it based on German aggression.

4 Germany had started a naval arms race with Britain.

Imperialist competition between the two states over markets and resources preceded the arms race in the fifteen years before the war. Britain’s naval power was the vital element in its ability to restrict German access to markets and resources across the world. Unless Britain was willing to allow Germany to expand economically, the logic of capitalist competition meant that Germany was bound to challenge British naval supremacy. The latent violence of the leading imperial nation is always the context for aggressive challenges to the status quo on the part of rising powers.

5 German imperialism was uniquely vicious and had to be challenged.

The atrocities committed against the Herrero people in Namibia were indeed terrible crimes, but were hardly unique compared to the horrors committed by all those involved in the rubber industry in the Belgian Congo, to take but one example. Also, European opinion had only a few years before 1914 been horrified by the brutality of another colonial power when it was engaged in ruthlessly expanding its dominance over independent states in Africa. This was Britain in its wars of aggression against the Boer states in South Africa, during which concentration camps were first used in order to control a civilian population.

6 Public opinion was united in favour of the war, as shown by images of cheering crowds in 1914.

It is now usually admitted that the degree of enthusiasm for the war was strictly limited, and the evidence is that the crowds who gathered at the outbreak of war were by no means united in martial enthusiasm. In fact sizeable and widespread anti-war demonstrations occurred in both Britain and Germany. Had the leaderships of Labour and Socialist parties across Europe not caved into demands to support their national ruling classes in going to war, it is quite possible that the conflict could have been stopped in its tracks.

7 The morale of British troops fighting on the Western Front remained intact to the end of the war.

While Britain may not have suffered quite the same scale of mutinies as in the German and French armies, at times there were whole stretches of the front where troops became so unreliable that generals did not dare order them into combat. The evidence for widespread cynicism about war strategies, contempt for the military leadership, and grave doubts about the purpose of the war, cannot be wished away by the revisionists. In so far as soldiers carried on willingly fighting the war, the explanation needs to be sought in the habituation to obedience, as well as the threat of court-martial executions. There is no need to invoke either fervid nationalism or any kind of deep psychological blood-lust as explanations.

8 The military leadership, notably General Haig, was not a bunch of incompetent ‘donkeys’.

Attempts to rehabilitate the likes of General Haig founder on some of the basic facts about the tactics he relentlessly employed. Repeated infantry attacks on opposing trenches consistently failed to gain any clear advantage, while causing colossal casualties. On the first day of the battle of the Somme, 1st July 1916, 57,000 troops out of 120,000 were killed or wounded. Despite continuing carnage on an incredible scale, Haig carried on ordering further attacks. When any hope of a breakthrough against the German lines was clearly lost, the purpose of the battle was shifted to attrition pure and simple. The plan now was to kill more German troops than the British lost. Since there was no way of reliably measuring the casualties on the other side, Haig relied on estimating it through the losses of his own side. On this basis he began to be angered when the army suffered too few losses, as when he complained that one division in September had lost under a thousand men. There can be no defence for this kind of disregard of human life.

9 The end of the war saw the triumph of liberal capitalism, against collapsing autocratic Empires.

In fact all states involved in the war were deeply destabilised. Even the United States, whose involvement was the most limited, experienced the ‘Red Summer’ of 1919, with unprecedented labour revolts, such as the Seattle general strike, alongside savage repression of socialists and black Americans. Britain saw the beginning of the Irish war of independence, and increasing unrest in India, which marks, in effect, the point at which the Empire began to unravel. Domestically, there was also a wave of radical working-class unrest, particularly in the ‘Red Clydeside’, which culminated in troops being sent into Glasgow to impose martial law.

10 The war achieved anything worthwhile whatsoever.

The war opened up a period of endemic economic dislocation, and outright crisis. In Britain there was a decade of industrial decline and high unemployment even before the Great Depression. In effect, it was only the Second World War which brought the major capitalist powers out of the slump. The First World War saw the point at which capitalism became addicted to war and to a permanent arms economy. The war demonstrated the capacity of capitalism to create industrialised waste, carnage and destruction on a colossal scale. The remembrance of the war is appropriately a time for mourning the horror, the loss and the waste of it all, but it should also provoke a determination to resist our rulers’ insistence on promoting war to further their interests. War can achieve nothing other than to create the conditions for further wars.

Popular opinion has, ever since its ending, remembered the First World War as a time of horrendous and futile misery and slaughter, as epitomising political and military leaders’ incompetence and callous disregard for human life. That popular judgement, which has helped turn common opinion against war in general, was correct, and we must not let the war mongers dismiss this instance of the wisdom of ordinary people.

Notes
The arguments in this article are developed at greater length in the author's review of Douglas Newton's book The Darkest Days: The Truth Behind Britain’s Rush to War, 1914 (Verso 2014).

The specifics for General Haig's murderous rage can be found in Adam Hochschild, To End All Wars (Pan 2013), p.209 - reviewed on this site by Lindsey German.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

What if everything you were taught about World War I was a lie as well? 04 Jul 2016 17:17 #13

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960
Flare wrote:
Myea, could be a good one I thought.

Altho those 2 vids tell a lot already of course.... but shall I start one?


This thread is about WWI and if you don't like it here is another one, as stated above:



PFIZIPFEI wrote:
I only happened to come across this thread now:


Word War 1 - The Great War Thread

truth-zone.net/forum/history/63828-world-war-1-the-great-war-thread.html



Edit: Seems you did not like either and started a new thread instead.
Edit2: I don't know who deleted or moved the comments for what reasons,
but I would at least like to know where my posts ended up ...

.
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 04 Jul 2016 21:09 by PFIZIPFEI.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Gaia

What if everything you were taught about World War I was a lie as well? 04 Jul 2016 17:51 #14

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 14332
  • Likes received: 5565
^ Aha, so I see... so basically both topics have same titles, which got me confused a bit.

Will delete the other one.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

What if everything you were taught about World War I was a lie as well? 04 Jul 2016 21:36 #15

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 14332
  • Likes received: 5565
entrangermercenary1 wrote:
Flare wrote:
^ Aha, so I see... so basically both topics have same titles, which got me confused a bit.

Will delete the other one.

Aha, so I see...:larf:

PMSL typical window licking behaviour, you, Lizzy, Orange and Zorro the Fantastic Four of window licking :wissl:

Note: I left the Frau out

Have you even read the topic and watched the vids...? :larf:
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

ASKARI: "We, the German soldiers, fear God and nothing else in the world!" - GERMAN 11 Sep 2016 10:02 #16

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960


Askari: "Wir die deutschen Soldaten ... " (We the German soldiers)


Hear the Askari speak German:



Short version: Surviving Askari commemorate Paul Emil von Lettow-Vorbeck




.... we fear God and nothing else in the world."



Video description:
... wir fürchten Gott sonst nichts auf der Welt."

Paul Emil von Lettow-Vorbeck 20.03.1870 - 09.03.1964 R.I.P
Der unbesiegte Löwe von Afrika

Links:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPRIwrZQQu0
Das Weltreich der Deutschen (1/3)


en.metapedia.org/wiki/Paul_von_Lettow-Vorbeck
de.metapedia.org/wiki/Paul_von_Lettow-Vorbeck


de.metapedia.org/wiki/Askari
.
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 11 Sep 2016 19:31 by PFIZIPFEI.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Return of Zorro

What if everything you were taught about World War I was a lie as well? 11 Sep 2016 18:06 #17

  • ..........
  • ..........'s Avatar
  • Offline
  • Straight Shooter
  • Posts: 10117
  • Likes received: 2864
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

What if everything you were taught about World War I was a lie as well? 11 Sep 2016 19:11 #18

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

What if everything you were taught about World War I was a lie as well? 07 Jun 2017 14:24 #19

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 07 Jun 2017 14:25 by PFIZIPFEI.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

What if everything you were taught about World War I was a lie as well? 07 Jun 2017 15:09 #20

The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. – Marcus Aurelius
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Flare
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2
Moderators: novum, rodin, Flare
Powered by Kunena Forum

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it. Secure transactions via paypal.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2019 - May 2020, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 278 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 160 - Raised
( £ 130 GBP )
donation thermometer
47%
Updated
2nd October 2019

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.