Your donations are appreciated and help keep this site running. Even the smallest amount helps.
Thankyou

 
PROMOTE YOUR SITE
HERE
Only $3 USD/month
TRUTHSPOON.COM
The man they can't recruit!
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: Freemasonry, Bolshevism and Dirty Little Secrets You Weren’t Supposed to Know: The Stalin-Churchill Pact

Freemasonry, Bolshevism and Dirty Little Secrets You Weren’t Supposed to Know: The Stalin-Churchill Pact 02 Feb 2015 13:44 #1

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960


Freemasonry, Bolshevism and Dirty Little Secrets You Weren’t Supposed to Know:


The Stalin-Churchill Pact




The following video is a 15 minute long excerpt from ‘In the Shadow of Hermes’ by Estonian Journalist / Historian Jüri Lina concerning some certain little known aspects of WWII, including: the Stalin-Churchill Pact, the reasons for Operation Barbarossa, the Soviet occupation of the Baltics and how the Germans were greeted as liberators, the Soviet War against Finland, Soviet Bolshevik terror and slave camps with knowledge and tacit consent of the Allies, and Allied Freemasonic document archives seized by the Germans, later taken and hidden by the Soviets. The original audio is Swedish with English subs. I have re-narrated this portion into English.



The facts are, as I have previously covered, and which is well documented, Hitler did not want war with Poland, much less with England and France. He tried for many years to come to a reasonable, honourable and peaceful settlement with Poland, with the assistance of England. The British, French, Soviets and Americans seemed to only have been looking for an excuse to war again with Germany, and to provoke one with their belligerence regarding the Versailles Dictates, and overtly through their proxies, particularly in Czechoslovakia. That was thwarted, at least temporarily, with the Munich Agreement. But the Poles who had regressed into stubbornness following the death Marshal Pilsudski, became increasingly more belligerent concerning Danzig and the corridor issues, once they had received military assurances from France and England. No attention was paid by the world media or the League of Nations to the suffering of the ethnic Germans in Poland whose human rights were increasingly being violated, followed by brutal pogroms, with thousands upon thousands of refugees streaming across the frontier into Germany. There were also numerous reported incursions into Germany by Polish forces. Hitler, who had been more patient and diplomatic than even many in his own party could comprehend, could no longer allow this situation continue. It was then just a matter of how to deal with it, without immediately bringing down the wrath of the international war mongers upon Germany.

Right from the beginning, in the early days in Munich, Hitler had declared himself at war against Bolshevism, which already had its tentacles well established in Germany, and particularly in Bavaria. He never ceased to fight them throughout his years of political struggle and in street battles, nor to root them out once he finally achieved power in 1933. Indeed, Bolshevism had some roots in Germany, as well as Paris, London and New York, and not to mention Washington, DC, where the Roosevelt administration was oozing Red. Jüri Lina’s documentary, based upon his book and his deep research, proves that Communism was the product of Freemasonry and High Finance (the International Bankster Gangsters) and completely supportive of the barbaric Bolsheviks, who profited immensely from it.

In many public speeches, Hitler had also declared himself at war with High Finance, “International Jewry” and Freemasonry. So, again, is it any surprise that they declared war on Germany in 1933? Obviously, he was NOT one of theirs, and he had other ideas about how and by whom Germany should be governed and financed, and whom the new German government should serve: das Volk! Thus, it was no small or easy decision for Hitler to sign a “Friendship Pact” with Stalin, whom he had no illusions about. But after all, England had refused Germany’s friendship, while the French leadership involved itself in various anti-German intrigues. After the invasion of Poland and especially, after victory over France, Hitler made mention of the documents he had found, which laid out clearly a great conspiracy.

The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, signed on August 23, 1939 gave Hitler a free hand to deal with Poland militarily, in a way that might prevent a larger and more catastrophic war, or so he hoped. It also opened the door to trade with the Soviets, in particular for much needed resources in return for German weapons and technology, but also in terms of “spheres of influence” which Hitler also hoped would keep the Russian Bear at bay, perhaps long enough to buy himself some time in a potential war with the West. But I do not believe for a minute that Hitler, in spite of his public rhetoric, ever took his eyes off of Stalin via his military and other intelligence branches. Indeed, it would not have been lost upon him that when the Soviets joined the battle in Poland on September 17th, 1939, that neither France nor England declared war on the Soviets. Obviously something was wrong with this picture, and you didn’t need to be genius to figure it out.

Stalin had his own agenda, which was always the Bolshevik Communist agenda to take over all of Europe, and the world. He was a “wild card” and a whore who knew that virtually everyone had an interest in obtaining his services in the interests of serving their own agendas. The British knew all too well what had taken place in the Soviet Union, not only with the overthrow and murder of the Czar and his family, but the years of brutal tyranny, mass murder and slavery, as did the USA, but they hid it from the masses as best they could. Yet in 1939, while the Royals and the “upper crust” of British society quietly backed Hitler whom they saw as a defence against Bolshevism, the British Government secretly entertained the butcher. He wanted a bidding war for his services and his allegiance, and was playing everyone. The Bolshevik Communist goal was always to have the Western powers fight each other into exhaustion, and then to quickly roll over them. The National Socialists were wise to that plan and I believe this is why Hitler always sought friendship with England, with whom Germany had much more in common, on economic and cultural levels, that is, unless you count in Fleet Street and the City of London.



A Dirty Little Secret Revealed


Here is yet another fact that you won’t hear discussed on the History Channel, nor on the BBC. Why? Because you weren’t supposed to know! Secret negotiations between Churchill and Stalin for mutual co-operation in a four front war against Germany began in April 1939, and by July they had already agreed that if Germany were to attack Poland, a declaration of war by the western Allies would only be against Germany, and not the Soviets. So Stalin’s “Friendship Pact” with Hitler was a complete charade. By the way, this is also in the time frame when Polish atrocities against ethnic Germans were ramped up. The barbarous nature of those heinous crimes, and in particular, those later witnessed in the Bromberg Massacre bear a suspicious resemblance to those committed by the NKVD and Cheka in the Soviet Union, and in the Spanish Civil War. Germany had, of course, played a major role their in defeating the Bolsheviks.

On October 15th, 1939 Winston Churchill, the International Bankster Gangster’s Boy and High Level Freemason, came to a verbal agreement with other the International Bankster Gangster’s Boy and fellow High Level Freemason Stalin. Following this agreement, Stalin had a free hand to invade Finland, while Churchill would invade Scandinavia, for the purposes of attacking Germany from the North, blocking access to shipments of raw materials, and controlling the northern sea lanes, essentially denying Germany any access to the open ocean. The Half-American Churchill, of course, was not yet the Prime Minister, but had been one of the war mongers seeking to oust the “appeaser” Chamberlain, no doubt hand picked by the City of London. Stalin would later sign the pact in writing on January 28th, 1940 and Churchill on February 8th, 1940. How do we know this? Marshall Mannerheim’s Secret file S-32, as detailed below.

But, before we go there, I must say that there are still those out there who say “Hitler let the Brits get away at Dunkirk” and others who say “Hitler was stupid for trying to fight a war on two fronts!” I have covered both Dunkirk and Operation Barbarossa in a number of older posts. Hitler had no choice but to attack the Soviets, as they were poised to attack Germany and to roll through Europe. Of course he never wanted a “two front war”. Who would? It was his worst nightmare. But it got worse. What about a four front war as the Allies planned? Stalin was going to stab Hitler in the back. He probably assumed that Hitler would lose a lot more of his troops and weapons against the BEF at Dunkirk, or indeed, may have thought that Hitler would carry on to invade Britain, leaving the rear wide open to him. That would have been suicide, don’t you think?. Do we really think Hitler didn’t bear that in mind?

Hitler went into great detail about all of the intel reports he received in his speech when declared war on the Soviet Union. We also know now that this threat was really thanks to Viktor Suvorov. I am sure Stalin was very surprised at how fast Germany dispensed with the French and Brits and was caught totally off guard. Not only by the speed of the Germans, but also their skill and ability, despite the overwhelming superior troop strength, and the weapons and resources of the Allies. The Germans were also very conservative in their use of weapons (including tanks and planes) and munitions in the West. Thus, they had much more left with which to fight the Soviets later.

Some say Hitler should have just “hit Stalin and run”. Hitler could not simply hope to cripple the Soviets temporarily and then leave. And go where exactly? There was no way Stalin would call it quits and walk away. The USSR was backed all the way by the USA who were supplying them with money, weapons and machinery through Lend-Lease, and Hitler knew it. It was “go all the way” and “do or die”. And he came “oh so close”, especially with the help he got from the millions of non-German Waffen SS volunteers. Sadly, he had traitors within his General Staff who did not carry out his orders, or sometimes did exactly the opposite of what Htiler had commanded. That is confirmed by various sources, but also by his Bodyguard / Valet Karl Wilhem Krause in my film “Hitler’s Shadow”

One more thing…at the outbreak of war, Britain and France moved very quickly to officially recognize the government of Spain under Franco and Churchill bribed him to not support Germany, or to give minimal and grudging support at best. Hitler despised Franco for this, after all Hitler had done for him, and wondered why he was so difficult to deal with. But the bribery story only came out in recent years.




Now to “S-32″


Erkki Hautamäki’s book, “Finland in the Eye of the Storm”





“Larger nations displayed a ruthless disdain towards smaller nations and their right to remain neutral. In its entirety are revealed, the secret agreements, political intrigue, deception and an inconceivable chain of events that led to the beginning of the Second World War and finally its end. Even Finland, a small northern republic and democracy was unwittingly drawn to this war frenzy of the lager nations.

Finland was however fortunate in those years of turmoil to have as its military and political leader a figure of great foresight and determination in the form of field Marshall Mannerheim. He had a broad experience spanning many years in international politics and a network of contacts on to which Finland was able to build the military and political alliances that saved the country.

During the Winter War, having received details of a secret agreement between the Western Powers and the Soviet Union to destroy Germany, Mannerheim, along with Finland’s political leaders made crucial decisions that saved the nation and possibly all the Nordic countries from becoming one large battleground. From 1932 onwards, Mannerheim kept original documents consisting of, for example, secret reports, letters, personal notes, into a file code named ”S-32”. Political reasons stopped Mannerheim from using this file as evidence after the war.

I have used secret documents, which victor nations have suppressed for 50 years, in Marshall C.G.E. Mannerheim’s file ”S-32” as the basis of my research. This material can finally shed some light on the historical truth that was not published along with Mannerheim’s memoirs. I have strived to merge the dramatic content in file S-32 with other source material and to display it in chronological order to give a clear account of political and military development in Europe. We can thus follow a logical chain of historical events, which lead us on from the First World War. We will come to realise – as the Marshall used to say- that matters which were put forward to him were often so complex, unclear and even unbelievable that he had to pause to get a sense of what was actually meant. The same patience is asked of the reader. With this book I hope to prove, particularly to my Finnish countrymen along with readers from other countries that our wartime leaders were not guilty of the crimes they were blamed for or the wars Finland was dragged into between 1939-1945.
[…]
Erkki Hautamäki, who holds the rank of Major in the Finnish army, has at his disposal the secret files of Vilho Tahvanainen, an undercover courier and trusted aid to Marshall Mannerheim. The Tahvanainen files consist of copies of Mannerheim’s secret (S-32) files covering the years 1932-50 duplicated with the authority of the Marshall himself. The author of this book has had a unique opportunity to compare and contrast documents and files from different countries and get an idea of the behind the scenes politics of the larger nations during WW2.

“Churchill and Stalin negotiated the starting of co-operation in a war of many fronts against Germany since April 1939. In July it was agreed that when Germany and the Soviet Union attack Poland, the declaration of war of the western allies would be focused only against German actions. On the 23rd of August 1939 Stalin and Hitler signed the so called Molotov-Ribbentrop agreement. Its secret extra protocol included the so-called concept of the sphere of interest that did not mean permission to conquer the Baltic states and Finland. It meant instead the right to demand strategic bases in case of war. On the 15th of October 1939 an agreement was signed between Stalin and Churchill (the allied forces). The core of it was the plan to destroy Germany both militarily and economically. Churchill’s old plan regarding the Scandinavian operation was also accepted.
[…]
The winter war of Finland did not stop because of Stalin’s fear of a possible threat of western allies attacking to defend Finland. It ended when Hitler sent Stalin an edict that Stalin shall cease the acts of war against Finland, or Germany will bombard Soviet troops and fight for Finland unbidden. The Marshal received from Hitler information about this edict and copies of the plan of the western allies and Stalin concerning Finland. If this would have happened, the allied forces would have conquered Norway and Sweden in the name of Finnish aid. Simultaneously the Soviet Union would have conquered Finland. Finland would have drawn into war and Scandinavia would have been a front against Germany. Churchill and the allied forces thus sold Finland to the Russians.

Stalin played simultaneously an ally of Germany and the western allies. His goal was to get the western allies and Germany to wear themselves down in their fighting against each other. After this he would conquer a weakened Europe. Stalin purchased first the newest mechanical weaponry from Germany. After it he obtained from the USA an immense amount of war material against Germany (and Finland) as Lend-lease aid. No final account of these possessions has yet been made. The unconditional denial of passage for allied forces through Sweden partially saved Finland. The agreement of Churchill and Stalin allowed the conquering of Scandinavia and the Baltic countries. A section was added that the conquered areas should be given their independence back after peace had come.

When the general courier of Stalin was transporting the strategic war plans from Churchill, the air force of Germany compelled the airplane to land on 9 Feb. 1940. During the examination of the air crew and the passengers, all documents were photographed. Hitler received exact information about the attack plans on several fronts of the allied forces. He thus started a preventive attack plan in Norway. Stalin did not know that the plans had been revealed. The Marshal’s so called scabbard order of the day on 9 July 1941 was born after Hitler’s edict to unambiguously express the goals of Finnish warfare, or otherwise Germany starts taking Finland under its government. ”


Read the full article here : juliusmilaitis.blogspot.de/2011/05/finland-in-eye-of-storm-erkki.html

I highly recommend watching the full 2 hour long documentary “In the Shadow of Hermes” (Swedish with English subs). Warning: Extremely graphic images of Soviet-Bolshevik atrocities!

And see: jyrilina.com/english/in-the-shadow-of-hermes-the-secrets-of-communism/

Thanks, Zorro truth-zone.net/forum/general-discussion/63469-what-if-everything-you-were-taught-about-world-war-ii-was-a-lie.html?start=1980#147842

A Follow-Up to the Stalin-Churchill Pact – Ribbentrop’s Letter to Mannerheim, March 7, 1940 truth-zone.net/forum/general-discussion/63469-what-if-everything-you-were-taught-about-world-war-ii-was-a-lie.html?start=2000#148657
.
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Winston Churchill wanted to Drench Germany with Poison Gas (as he did to Iraq in WWI) 04 Feb 2015 13:04 #2

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960

Winston Churchill wanted to Drench Germany with Poison Gas


(as he did to Iraq in WWI)







In a secret wartime memorandum, Winston Churchill told his advisers that he wanted to “drench” Germany with poison gas. Churchill’s July 1944 memo to his chief of staff Gen. Hastings Ismay was reproduced in the August-September 1985 issue of American Heritage magazine.


“I want you to think very seriously over this question of poison gas,” the four-page note began. Britain’s wartime leader continued: “It is absurd to consider morality on this topic when everybody used it [gas] in the last war without a word of complaint from the moralists or the Church. On the other hand, in the last war the bombing of open cities was regarded as forbidden. Now everybody does it as a matter of course. It is simply a question of fashion changing as she does between long and short skirts for women.”


Churchill’s directive bluntly stated: “I want a cold-blooded calculation made as to how it would pay to use poison gas … One really must not be bound within silly conventions of the mind whether they be those that ruled in the last war or those in reverse which rule in this.” Specifically he proposed: “We could drench the cities of the Ruhr and many other cities in Germany in such a way that most of the population would be requiring constant medical attention … It may be several weeks or even months before I shall ask you to drench Germany with poison gas, and if we do it, let us do it one hundred per cent. In the meantime, I want the matter studied in cold blood by sensible people and not by the particular set of psalm-singing uniformed defeatists which one runs across now here now here now there.”


Churchill’s proposal, which would have meant violating the 1925 Geneva Protocol outlawing the use of poison gas, was never adopted. His military advisers argued that gas warfare would divert Allied war planes from the more effective strategy of bombing Germany’s industries and cities. Gas attacks would not be decisive, they feared, and Germany would very probably retaliate with devastating effect against Britain. Churchill complained to an associate that he was “not at all convinced by this negative report,” but he reluctantly gave in. “Clearly I cannot make head against the parsons and the warriors at the same time,” he complained in private.


The American Heritage article, written by Stanford University history professor Barton J. Bernstein, also reported that top American military officials urged the U.S. to begin gas warfare against Japan. Maj. Gen. William N. Porter, chief of the Chemical Warfare Service, pleaded in mid-December 1943 with U.S. Army superiors to initiate gas warfare against the Japanese, and on several occasions in 1945 Gen. George C. Marshall, U.S. Army chief of staff, urged using gas in the Pacific. There was some popular support for this view. The New York Daily News declared “We Should Gas Japan,” and Washington Times-Herald agreed, explaining “You Can Cook `Em Better with Gas.” But this was a minority view. About 75 percent of Americans reportedly opposed initiating gas warfare. After the war Gen. Marshall said that the main reason that gas wasn’t used was opposition from the British, who feared that a desperate German might then use it in Europe.


The United States produced about 135,000 tons of chemical warfare agents during the war, while Germany turned out about 70,000 tons, Britain about 40,000 and Japan only 7,500 tons. Although the Allies had larger stockpiles of traditional chemical agents, Germany developed far more advanced and lethal nerve gasses, most notably the devastating agents Tabun, Sarin and Soman. They were never used.


After the war a British Army chemical warfare expert concluded that Germany could have delayed the June 1944 Allied cross-channel invasion by six months if it had gas. “Such a delay,” he noted, “could have given the Germans sufficient time to complete their new V-weapons, which would have made the Allies’ task all the harder and England’s long range bombardment considerably worse.” Even in March and April 1945, when German military resistance was rapidly collapsing, Germany kept its pledge not to use gas. Hitler reportedly refused to consider using poison gas in part because of his recollection of the horror of his own gassing during the First World War, which temporarily blinded him.


Source
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 04 Feb 2015 13:04 by PFIZIPFEI.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Orangeaid

Winston Churchill wanted to Drench Germany with Poison Gas (as he did to Iraq in WWI) 04 Feb 2015 19:03 #3

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960
Isn't it strange that at least 80% of this forum's members constantly whine about "victims of nazi atrocities" but never ever have a compasionate or at least humane comment on German and other victims who are no jews?

This clearly exposes the mindset of the majority here.




COMMENT on the previous post # 2


I must be noted, however, that it was also Churchill’s idea to bomb civilian targets from the outset of the war, and not Hitler. Indeed, Churchill had conceived of it! It was also the British and Americans who for nearly a decade had been developing long-range heavy bombers for this purpose and building them. Hitler had always opposed the concept and pleaded with the world community to ban such practices, long before the war. He had also urged the WWI allies to live up to their commitments to disarmament as pledged in the Treaty of Versailles. When they failed to do so, Hitler began to re-arm Germany, but never developed long-range heavy bombers for the purpose of bombing cities, but rather, only smaller bombers for tactical ground support. Furthermore, it was Churchill, as I have pointed out on previous posts, who started aerial bombardments and the targeting of civilians. Hitler waited very patiently before finally responding, but did not deliberately target civilians. Germany only developed and manufactured heavier bombers in response to Churchill.

Churchill’s psychotic idea of gassing civilian populations, however, did NOT start during World War II, but rather, were a desire to continue with his hideous policies from the First World War, along with Sir Arthur BOMBER HARRIS!





by Justice For Germans
.
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Winston Churchill wanted to Drench Germany with Poison Gas (as he did to Iraq in WWI) 04 Feb 2015 19:12 #4

  • Oracle
  • Oracle's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Futurist & Anthropogenist
  • Posts: 3979
  • Likes received: 3241
PFIZIPFEI wrote:




COMMENT on the previous post # 2


I must be noted, however, that it was also Churchill’s idea to bomb civilian targets from the outset of the war, and not Hitler.
.

It must be also noted, that it was Frederick Lindemann, Churchill's jewish scientific chief advisor, who whispered him this devilish idea and how to create a firestorm in densely settled housing quarters.
The resident shill announced
blue_tackler wrote:
please make my profile inactive, I no longer want to have any connection to this forum.

yet he is trolling further. :facepalm:

blue_tackler wrote:
the lice are only going to jump onto other typhus victim

Prime example of holocaustianity mental issues, clinically insane, and utterly ill informed, a danger to public health if this dude was working for CDC.
Last Edit: 04 Feb 2015 19:12 by Oracle.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: PFIZIPFEI, Orangeaid

Winston Churchill wanted to Drench Germany with Poison Gas (as he did to Iraq in WWI) 04 Feb 2015 19:36 #5

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960


Born in Baden-Baden, is he - by chance and genes - somehow related to multi-millionaire Till Lindemann ?

"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 04 Feb 2015 19:36 by PFIZIPFEI.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

PART II: Winston S. Churchill: departmental minute (Churchill papers: 16/16) 12 May 1919 War Office 05 Feb 2015 19:28 #6

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960

PART II: Winston S. Churchill: departmental minute

(Churchill papers: 16/16) 12 May 1919 War Office




“I do not understand this squeamishness about the use of gas. We have definitely adopted the position at the Peace Conference of arguing in favour of the retention of gas as a permanent method of warfare. It is sheer affectation to lacerate a man with the poisonous fragment of a bursting shell and to boggle at making his eyes water by means of lachrymatory gas.

I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes.
The moral effect should be so good that the loss of life should be reduced to a minimum. It is not necessary to use only the most deadly gasses: gasses can be used which cause great inconvenience and would spread a lively terror and yet would leave no serious permanent effects on most of those affected.“




SOURCE: Companion Volume 4, Part 1 of the official biography, WINSTON S. CHURCHILL, by Martin Gilbert (London: Heinemann, 1976)



In 1917, following the defeat of the Ottoman Empire, the British occupied Iraq and established a colonial government. The Arab and Kurdish people of Iraq resisted the British occupation, and by 1920 this had developed into a full scale national revolt, which cost the British dearly. As the Iraqi resistance gained strength, the British resorted to increasingly repressive measures, including the use of posion gas.


SOURCE: Excerpt from pages 179-181 of Simons, Geoff. “IRAQ: FROM SUMER TO SUDAN”. London: St. Martins Press, 1994.



Winston Churchill, as colonial secretary, was sensitive to the cost of policing the Empire; and was in consequence keen to exploit the potential of modern technology. This strategy had particular relevance to operations in Iraq. On 19 February, 1920, before the start of the Arab uprising, Churchill (then Secretary for War and Air) wrote to Sir Hugh Trenchard, the pioneer of air warfare.


“Would it be possible for Trenchard to take control of Iraq? This would entail the provision of some kind of asphyxiating bombs calculated to cause disablement of some kind but not death…for use in preliminary operations against turbulent tribes.”


Churchill was in no doubt that gas could be profitably employed against the Kurds and Iraqis (as well as against other peoples in the Empire):


“I do not understand this sqeamishness about the use of gas. I am strongly in favour of using poison gas against uncivilised tribes.”


Henry Wilson shared Churchill’s enthusiasm for gas as an instrument of colonial control but the British cabinet was reluctant to sanction the use of a weapon that had caused such misery and revulsion in the First World War. Churchill himself was keen to argue that gas, fired from ground-based guns or dropped from aircraft, would cause “only discomfort or illness, but not death” to dissident tribespeople; but his optimistic view of the effects of gas were mistaken. It was likely that the suggested gas would permanently damage eyesight and “kill children and sickly persons, more especially as the people against whom we intend to use it have no medical knowledge with which to supply antidotes.”


Churchill remained unimpressed by such considerations, arguing that the use of gas, a “scientific expedient,” should not be prevented “by the prejudices of those who do not think clearly”. In the event, “gas was used against the Iraqi rebels with excellent moral effect” though gas shells were not dropped from aircraft because of practical difficulties […]


[In 1993 there were still Iraqis and Kurds who remembered being] bombed and machine-gunned by the RAF in the 1920s. A Kurd from the Korak mountains commented, seventy years after the event:[i] “They were bombing here in the Kaniya Khoran … Sometimes they raided three times a day.”[/i] Wing Commander Lewis, then of 30 Squadron (RAF), Iraq, recalls how quite often “one would get a signal that a certain Kurdish village would have to be bombed…”, the RAF pilots being ordered to bomb any Kurd who looked hostile. In the same vein, Squadron-Leader Kendal of 30 Squadron recalls that “if the tribespeople were doing something they ought not be doing then you shot them.”


Similarly, Wing-Commander Gale, also of 30 Squadron: “If the Kurds hadn’t learned by our example to behave themselves in a civilised way then we had to spank their bottoms. This was done by bombs and guns.”


Wing-Commander Sir Arthur Harris (later known as BOMBER HARRIS, Head of British Wartime Bomber Command) was happy to emphasise that:


“The Arab and Kurd now know what real bombing means in casualties and damage.
Within forty-five minutes a full-size village can be practically wiped out and a third of its inhabitants killed or injured.”



It was an easy matter to bomb and machine-gun the tribespeople, because they had no means of defence or retalitation. Iraq and Kurdistan were also useful laboratories for new weapons; devices specifically developed by the Air Ministry for use against tribal villages. The ministry drew up a list of possible weapons, some of them the forerunners of napalm and air-to-ground missiles: Phosphorus bombs, war rockets, metal crowsfeet [to maim livestock] man-killing shrapnel, liquid fire, delay-action bombs. Many of these weapons were first used in Kurdistan.



Excerpted from pages 179-181 of Simons, Geoff. “Iraq: From Sumer to Saddam”. London: St. Martins Press, 1994.

www.informationclearinghouse.info/article999.htm




"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Orangeaid

PART II: Winston S. Churchill: departmental minute (Churchill papers: 16/16) 12 May 1919 War Office 06 Feb 2015 12:39 #7

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960

"With muffled drums and at great cost to the nation that evil man just like a Thatcher, that old bastard got a state funeral ..

After a heavy German air raid we stood in the streets waiting for that Churchill to roll past us whilst he had a tiki tour sightseeing the damage .. many of the people hated him .. because they knew him for what he was .. and the ordinary people knew that we were less than disposable garbage to that reptile .. and it was quite evident from the remarks as he passed us that many people knew that.

His mindset was not extraordinary for the circles he moved in .. Genocide and Eugenics are still popular subjects because that is the link .. that cursed evil mindset that deems us expendable in favour of a self appointed elite.

Personally I feel that the ultimate aim of these chemtrails is not weather control but rather genocide and enslavement .. the only difference between watching that evil man roll past us in WW2 .. is that now, the enabling technology and the logistics are in the hands of these psychopaths."


- herbda2







General Curtis LeMay of the US Air Force, who headed the bombing campaign of Germany, said :
"If we had LOST THE WAR, I am sure I would have been tried as a WAR CRIMINAL."

DRESDEN FIRESTORM DOCUMENTARIES
.
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

PART II: Winston S. Churchill: departmental minute (Churchill papers: 16/16) 12 May 1919 War Office 07 Feb 2015 19:30 #8

  • Mario
  • Mario's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Mushroom Kingdom
  • You have the Right NOT to Vote! = for EVIL!
  • Posts: 4677
  • Likes received: 1526
PFIZIPFEI wrote:
Indeed he did & he was made an example of and another 70,000,000 ended up as dead as he did & was the prove how it will not work.
And never will work.

A different way needs to be found & not the same mistake.

So for those which learned something important from it ........ its time to think about how it really could be done.

Hitler did not know the real enemy (& if he did know would made him a part of it!) ........
that's why it all failed & would fail again if the same patten would get implemented.

No military & all there pimps will defeat there OWN 6000 year old system.
And those which were able to create the conflict by just a simple boycott implementation clearly knowing how it really works.

So I say do the same in reverse without the killing action part serving there agenda & see how it goes and leave the military out of the game and give them the exacts same treatment by kicking them all out and removing there source which makes them all; exist in the first place.

Stand-down 100% in all areas & services.
One single thing all your think tanks fear the most; because it would be there end no matter who they are!


But I'm very much convinced & is my opinion you will not understand this ............. because your target philosophy is aiming into a totally different direction.

Revenge will not work! ............ it needs more then this to fix the real problem and close to everyone needs to be involved out of understanding to ever see any end of this game being played.


Btw..... he was not fighting against the NWO ............ it was WO in there documents.

Part of the message is hidden for the guests. Please log in or register to see it.
@ oiram @
Last Edit: 07 Feb 2015 21:09 by Mario.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Winston Churchill anuncia la derrota de Alemania - Discurso de Winston Churchill 16 Feb 2015 10:11 #9

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960
Discurso de Winston Churchill








Winston Churchill anuncia la derrota de Alemania







Videos históricos en español www.youtube.com/user/TeLiberaLaVerdad/videos

.
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Freemasonry, Bolshevism and Dirty Little Secrets You Weren’t Supposed to Know: The Stalin-Churchill Pact 20 Nov 2015 13:10 #10

  • Orangeaid
  • Orangeaid's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 11638
  • Likes received: 8004
Winston Churchill was a "secret Jew." This was admitted in the Jerusalem Post, Jan.18, 1993, where editorial columnist Moshe Kohn wrote: 

"Cunning, no doubt, came to Churchill in the Jewish genes transmitted by his mother Lady Randolph Churchill, née Jenny Jacobson/Jerome."Moshe Kohn, Jerusalem Post, Jan.18, 1993. 

This explains his approach to Hitler. 
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: PFIZIPFEI

Freemasonry, Bolshevism and Dirty Little Secrets You Weren’t Supposed to Know: The Stalin-Churchill Pact 20 Nov 2015 13:13 #11

  • Orangeaid
  • Orangeaid's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 11638
  • Likes received: 8004
Leonard Jerome was the Jewish owner of the New York Times. He was a close friend of August Belmont, Sr American representative of the Rothschild family's banking. He changed his name from Jacobson to Jerome. His daughter was Jenny Jacobson/Jerome, the mother of Winston Churchill.

Jenny Jacobson, 1854 - 1921, met Lord Randolph at Cowes. They were married in 1874 at the British embassy in Paris. The Duke and Duchess of Marlborough 'were conspicuously absent'.

What did Winston Churchill think of Zionism?

Winston wrote an article entitled 'Zionism versus Bolshevism' which appeared in the Illustrated Sunday Herald of February 8, 1920. Churchill wrote:

‘This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution.

'It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their beards and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.’

Churchill found 'Jewish money' useful.

By 1938 Churchill was in financial difficulty.

‘At this hour of crisis a dark and mysterious figure entered Churchill's life: he was Henry Strakosch, a multi-millionaire Jew who had acquired a fortune speculating in South African mining ventures after his family had migrated to that country from eastern Austria. Strakosch stepped forward, advanced the ageing demagogue a "loan" of £150,000 just in time to save his estate from the auctioneer, and then quietly slipped into the background again.

'In the years that followed, Strakosch served as Churchill's adviser and confidant but miraculously managed to avoid the spotlight of publicity which thenceforth illuminated Churchill's again-rising political career.’

Who was Winston's father?

Winston's mother, Jenny Jacobson 'was a notorious adulteress'. Jenny Churchill's promiscuity was commented upon by historian William Manchester in Volume 1 of his incomplete Churchill trilogy, The Last Lion.

Winston's putative father, Lord Randolph Churchill, 'treated Winston with distance and disdain'.

‘It seems not to have occurred to anyone that Winston may have been a literal as well as figurative bastard.’ Maguire, FAEM (www.faem.com), 9 February 2002
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: PFIZIPFEI

Freemasonry, Bolshevism and Dirty Little Secrets You Weren’t Supposed to Know: The Stalin-Churchill Pact 01 Dec 2015 08:38 #12

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Return of Zorro

Freemasonry, Bolshevism and Dirty Little Secrets You Weren’t Supposed to Know: The Stalin-Churchill Pact 16 Apr 2016 12:50 #13

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960
Voltaire wrote:
Mike King was on Red Ice to talk about Churchill - MK's website has loads of revisionist material

www.tomatobubble.com/

www.redicecreations.com/radio/2016/04/RIR-160413.php - only Hour 1 - Hour 2 is members only

extract from blurb
Our discussion focuses on the subject of King’s latest book, “The British Mad Dog: Debunking the Myth of Winston Churchill.” We begin with a look into the English blueblood family that was prominent in high society and politics for 250 years before the man championed as “The British Bulldog” was produced. Mike touches on Churchill’s early upbringing in military boarding schools as the son of an abusive, distant father and NYC socialite mother, and grandson of the “King of Wall Street.” We learn about his years as a highly paid English war correspondent, entry into British parliament, and his swift appointment on the eve of the great war as the First Lord of the British Admiralty. Then, Mike explains Churchill’s role in the German hunger blockade of WWI, a key point when it became clear he was playing in the globalist Zionist game. He characterizes the reckless and psychopathic behavior that Churchill became known for, most notably his perpetual drunkenness and indebtedness, poor political strategies, his part in the catastrophic 1926 crash of the British economy, and a callous disregard for human life. Mike also covers the “Wilderness Years,” when Churchill was banished from politics, and his return to power that was financed by the same Jewish billionaires who were angling for a war with Germany.

In the members’ segment, Mike talks about Churchill’s tarnished reputation with the British public and how he managed to rise once again despite being booted from his position as Prime Minister. We look at the outset of WWII when bloodthirsty Churchill was at the forefront of engineering and deliberately provoking the bombing of his own country by the Germans. Further, Mike discusses Hitler’s appeals to Britain and attempts for peace agreements to stop the ensuing war, and his response to the indiscriminate carpet bombings of German civilians that were propagandized to the hilt, solidifying the demonization of National Socialist Germany. Later, we get into the vindictive orchestration of the 1943 Bengal famine that coincided with India’s fight for independence, of which Churchill was fiercely against. Then, we look at one of the most enduring myths of WWII – the purported looting of fine art across Germany and Europe by the Nazis. Mike illustrates Hitler’s veneration for art, architecture and heritage and his foresight to save the cultural treasures that would have been destroyed by the Allied Forces in their barbaric bombing crusades, which targeted neutral, friendly and even allied countries. At the end, we consider the psychological warfare that continues whipping Germany into submission in the latest chapter of demoralization known as the Kalergi Plan.

Source: truth-zone.net/forum/general-discussion/65759-what-if-everything-you-were-taught-about-world-war-ii-was-a-lie.html?start=3100#203471




Reading all of the above on this thread the question inevitably arises in every man endowed with a brain:



Who is in reality trying to exterminate whom from the face of the earth?



But as we all know even those questions can lead to prosecution and worse,
thus they have to remain rhetorical for now.
Basic human rights mean nothing in the face of de facto totalitarianism.

Those misanthropic, obscenely rich old men, who acquired the exclusive
prerogative of interpretation by means of their money power, are the real
culprits, hiding behind their stooges, who infiltrated and now control all
levels of human society in the "western" world.



Ref on TZ: TOPIC: EXTERMINATION = AUSROTTUNG ? ? ?

.
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Return of Zorro

Freemasonry, Bolshevism and Dirty Little Secrets You Weren’t Supposed to Know: The Stalin-Churchill Pact 05 Dec 2016 11:23 #14

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960



Winston Churchill bust set for Oval Office return by Donald Trump


Farage is a wiesel?




“My private office is called the Treaty Room. Right outside the door of the Treaty Room so that I see it every day, including on weekends when I’m going into that office to watch a basketball game, the primary image I see is a bust of Winston Churchill,” he said.

“It’s there voluntarily ‘cause I can do anything on the second floor. I love Winston Churchill, I love the guy."

The Epstein sculpture had been given to President George W Bush by Tony Blair, the former Prime Minister, and was displayed in the Oval Office from 2001-2009.

Nigel Farage used an hour-long meeting with Mr Trump last week to persuade him to return the Churchill bust to the Oval Office.

Many people would like to see @Nigel_Farage represent Great Britain as their Ambassador to the United States. He would do a great job!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 22, 2016

Mr Farage said that Mr Trump, an Anglophile, was “excited” by the idea and was “very positive” about returning the bust to the Oval Office.

Mr Trump has called for Britain to install Mr Farage as ambassador to the US.



VIDEO and full article: www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/11/24/winston-churchill-bust-set-oval-office-return-donald-trump/

Related: truth-zone.net/forum/history/66421-winston-churchill.html#193205

Bonus:

TRUMPERY by Kevin Alfred Strom nationalvanguard.org/2016/02/trumpery/
.
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Freemasonry, Bolshevism and Dirty Little Secrets You Weren’t Supposed to Know: The Stalin-Churchill Pact 05 Dec 2016 11:30 #15

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 17005
  • Likes received: 7929
Well you cant expect to see a bust of adolf in there now can you, not publicly anyway. :hahano: :P

Oh, and...

:bump:

:P
He who is without oil shall throw the first rod.
- Compressions 13.3:1
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Gaia

Freemasonry, Bolshevism and Dirty Little Secrets You Weren’t Supposed to Know: The Stalin-Churchill Pact 18 Feb 2017 09:20 #16

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960
You might want to take into consideration Churchill's plan to gas the Germans, factual Dresden holo etc., novum.




Trump returns bust of Churchill to Oval Office


Barack Obama had replaced figure of former prime minister with Martin Luther King Jr


Full article: www.irishtimes.com/news/world/us/trump-returns-bust-of-churchill-to-oval-office-1.2946350
.
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Freemasonry, Bolshevism and Dirty Little Secrets You Weren’t Supposed to Know: The Stalin-Churchill Pact 18 Feb 2017 10:00 #17

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 17005
  • Likes received: 7929
Well how can one expect any different from the president of this corporation...



Aside from the edomitic eagle, what else lies in plain sight above it. :wissl:

( Though many cant see it, pep can :yup: )

He who is without oil shall throw the first rod.
- Compressions 13.3:1
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Freemasonry, Bolshevism and Dirty Little Secrets You Weren’t Supposed to Know: The Stalin-Churchill Pact 18 Feb 2017 15:06 #18

  • GMP
  • GMP's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 3506
  • Likes received: 856
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Freemasonry, Bolshevism and Dirty Little Secrets You Weren’t Supposed to Know: The Stalin-Churchill Pact 26 Feb 2017 21:31 #19

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960

Obituary for the Greatest Briton




The 91-year old Winston Spencer Churchill finally threw off his mortal coil in 1965. It was said that his last wish was to be buried in alcohol like the great naval hero, Horatio Nelson. Refused on grounds of taste and expense it was said to be unnecessary as Churchill was already 99% alcohol and only 1% human.

Read more: www.renegadetribune.com/obituary-greatest-briton/



Orangeaid wrote:
Churchill was an alcoholic homosexual pedophile. His mother was Jewish. A socialite from New York.

He was heavily influenced by Zionist lobby group, The Focus Group. It's head was the zionist CEO of Royal Dutch Shell. That's no surprise that the head of the Focus Group came from there given Shell Transport (the UK arm of Royal Dutch Shell) was a Rothschild entity.

Churchill's Jewishness goes a long way to explain his attitude towards Germany.
truth-zone.net/forum/history/66421-winston-churchill.html#193137


- Winston Churchill 'wanted to use most devastating chemical weapon ever devised' on Russian Bolsheviks (!!!) at the end of WWI by Frog
- Israël Shamir on Putin, Churchill, Stalin, Pol Pot, Yugoslavia, Syria, Libya, USA, Jewish Oligarchs, Greece, Europe by mhs
- WINSTON CHURCHILL A TRUE LEADER by the mercenary of the system
- Winston Churchill by "Robert Baird" aka Shlomo Shlycher
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 26 Feb 2017 21:32 by PFIZIPFEI.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Freemasonry, Bolshevism and Dirty Little Secrets You Weren’t Supposed to Know: The Stalin-Churchill Pact 13 Apr 2017 15:57 #20

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960
Orangeaid wrote:
Churchill had already thought of making an alignment with Stalin in 1934, to take on their common enemy, Germany

truth-zone.net/forum/general-discussion/65759-what-if-everything-you-were-taught-about-world-war-ii-was-a-lie.html?start=3840#257466


Very interesting, but unfortunately w/o source.


Ivan Maisky: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Maisky
.
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
Moderators: novum, rodin, Flare
Powered by Kunena Forum

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it. Secure transactions via paypal.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2019 - May 2020, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 278 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 160 - Raised
( £ 130 GBP )
donation thermometer
47%
Updated
2nd October 2019

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.