G'day Censor Flare.
Cherry picking to put your spin on it eh.
Apart from failing to provide any verifiable evidence proving the existence of ":Christ", let alone that anyone 'crucified' this supposed 'Christ", you failed to add religions to the list under Jewish control, which includes the Roman Catholic Church. Surprise, surprise.
I already posted the following information on this thread .....
MrAnderson wrote:
There is actually still a lot of debate on who is said to have destroyed the Library of Alexandria
I used to believe it was the early christians too , because I hadnt bothered to look eslewhere
There is just as much conjecture that the Library itself was destroyed upon the order.of an Islamic Caliph
incidentally , much focus is put upon the Library of Alexandria as an.example of early christian zeaolotry and disregard for antiquity
but to put across a much less disputed event of disregard for antiquity , how many of you know that the great pyramids of Egypt were once encased in bright white stone ?
and where is this stone today?
its called the city of Cairo , as the Pyramids were strippes of their casing stones by Islamic instruction
desecration of Temples and places of learning seems rather contrary to Roman ideas tbh
also , any word on the Christian held libraries of Constantinople and the Byzantines fall ?
or are we much learned in just one aspect of the history of this world ?
G'day MrAnderson.
Pol Pot was killing all of the intellectuals, teachers, etc, and going to make himself God & Emperor while starting the calendar back at 0 and erasing all history.
The burning of the Library of Alexandria was done for the same purpose ... to erase history.
Funny enough, Islam has an interesting origin directly connected to the Roman Catholic Church .....
Was Mohammed a Jew?
Categories: Acharya S/D.M. Murdock
Here is an excerpt from Chapter Thirteen of “The Crucifixion of Truth” by Tony Bushby (a book that really takes apart so-called “Christian truth”, although Bushby believes that Jesus really existed. I have added his references below this excerpt. —
— “Today he is called Mohammed (570-632), but his real name was Lothar Schmalfuss.( 1) Ancient Christian writings recorded a remarkable revelation about Mohammed’s early religious life and revealed the true reason for the commencement of the Islamic faith. The reference is found in a book called ‘Chronica Majora’, a summary of world history from biblical Creation to the year of the author’s death. It was written by Matthew Paris (d.1259), a pious Christian monk, described by the church ‘as an historian who holds the first place among English chroniclers’ .(2) From his quaint specimen of Abbey records, the erudite Monk explained how Mohammed started an ‘impious religion’:
“‘It is well known that Mohammed was once a cardinal, and became heretic because he failed to be elected pope. Also (later in life) having drunk to excess, he fell by the roadside, and in this condition was killed by swine. And for that reason, his followers abhor pork even unto this day.'(3)
“Monk Matthew Paris called Mohammed ‘cardinal’; a term that today signifies councilors of the pope, and the origin of that category of priesthood reveals another area of censored information in Christian development. The 16th Century church said that ‘the office of cardinal (incardinatus) first came into being in the 6th Century…its true origin to this day remains unanswered for in none of the Councils (records) do we find authority for the distinguishing features of the office’.(4) However, the position of cardinal was created by special decree at a French synod in January 560 and that information is recorded church history. ‘The Synods which were held during the sixth century were confined to France and Spain. They amount to twenty-six in number, and like those of the minor Councils which preceded them, are interspersed with canons, having in view the security of the church proper’.(5)
“It was at one of those Synods that the ‘creatio’ of cardinals occurred and the deliberations involved in its manufacture were termed ‘frivolous’ by the 19th Century church. At that gathering a group of seven old bishops ‘of carnal nature'(6) established for themselves a special office to protect their earthly privileges. Many bishops of the time ‘were given up to worldliness and gain, and we hear of worse scandals'(7) and the creation of a new hierarchal administrative body of churchmen was one of those disgraces. Under the guise of ‘bearers of hidden knowledge’ they generated a new upper level class of ecclesiastics that were sworn by oath never to reveal the true origins of Christianity outside their select group. Professional clergymen were now entering the church and to protect the knowledge of Constantine’ s deification of his descendants at Nicaea from reaching new priests, a directorial code of silence was developed by the Incardinatus.
“Incoming clerics were naive about the true Christian origins and the basis of their preaching was not revealed until they achieved and maintained the office of bishop. They were then eligible to enter the College of Cardinals, and after swearing a vow of secrecy, were enlightened as to the invented nature of the Christian deity. Mohammed had achieved the position of cardinal, knew the false essence of Christianity, and having being passed over for the top papal job at around the age of forty, departed and established his own religion.
“Mohammed alleged that he received ‘divine communication’ from god in a cave on Mt. Hira and that information subsequently becaem the contents of the Holy Koran. The competitive religion that he established was similar in concept to Christianity, but excluded the ‘son of God on Earth’ dogma, and its variant system of belief had devstating effects upon the growth of Christianity. . . .
“. . . From the position of cardinal, Mohammed knew the church’s farcical presentation of its deity and confirmed that Jesus was ‘verily a true prophet of Allah and a grand man: But lo! his disciples all went insane one day, and made a God of him’.(8) In the Koran he added this extraordinary passage, ‘and they killed him not, nor did they cause his death on a cross’.(9)
“Mohammed had nine wives and one Roman Catholic concubine, his favorite being Aisha, who resided with him until his gory death.(10) In the Koran he summoned followers to ‘give alms’, ensuring that he lived in sumptuous surroundings amidst vast wealth during his life.”
Bushby’s references:
(1) –“The World’s Religions” Lion Publishing, Pg. 315, 1994
(2) –“Catholic Encyclopedia” , i. 187, i, 620-1, x. 425
(3) –“Catholic Encyclopedia” , i. 187, i, 620-1, x. 425)
(4) –“Annales Ecclesiastici” , tome viii, Fol. Antwerp, 1597, Cardinal Caesar Baronius
(5) –“Ecclesiastical History”, Du Pin, vol. i, pg. 710
(6) –“The Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers”, Second Series. Edited by the Rev. Professor Roberts, D.D., and Principal James Donaldson, L.L.D., St.
Andrews, The Christian Literature Publishing Co., Buffalo, NY, 1885
(7) –“Catholic Encyclopedia” , 1908, Vol. IV. Pg. 583
(8) –Notes on Abulfeda, Gagnier, also; The Life of Mahomet, Updated
(9) –Koran, Surah 4. (Did he know something the rest of us don’t know? Of course, Bushby’s theory is that “Jesus” had been stoned to death and not
crucified. But this statement can just as well suggest that there was no one to crucify anyway.)
(10) –“Encyclopedia Britannica, Macropedia, Vol. 12, Pg. 607
Linda
stellarhousepublishing.com/was-mohammed-a-jew/
Tony Bushby also wrote ...
The Bible Fraud
The Secret in the Bible
The Crucifixion of Truth
The Papal Billions
Bushby has a theory about who 'Jesus' was in history, though I lean more to the idea that he is the son of Cleopatra and Julius Caesar. After all, Caesar was deified while he was alive and his initials are JC.
Bushby had access to some very early bibles, ones that originally contained the idea of reincarnation, which is essentially the idea of 'Jesus' coming back again. One of the stunning pieces of information is that the Roman Catholic Church admits in the Catholic Encyclopedia that they appellate the names to the four gospels and they do not know who actually wrote them.
The exposure of the Papal crimes and debauchery over the centuries is well documented, as is the quotes from Bishop Eusubius and Pope Leo X .....
..... which lends weight to the idea that Lother Schmalfuss started Islam at the behest of the Roman Catholic Church as controlled opposition.
The characters in the religious texts of Christianity and Islam have their origins in Judaism. This is why they are known as the Abrahamic religions.
In the narrative, the character Abraham is taken out of the Mesopotamian city of Ur by God. Funny enough, one of the deities worshipped in the city of Ur was the God 'Sin'.
".....
Sin had a beard made of lapis lazuli and rode on a winged bull. The bull was one of his symbols, through his father, Enlil, "Bull of Heaven", along with the crescent and the tripod (which may be a lamp-stand). On cylinder seals, he is represented as an old man with a flowing beard and the crescent symbol.
....."
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sin_(mythology)
The "Bull of Heaven" ... a Papal Bull .... the flowing beard and the crescent moon. All representations of the same shizzle.
In relationship to the pyramid comment, did you know that the Great Pyramid at Giza actually had 144,000 limestone casing stones?
Funny that number, especially in regards to the 144,000 to be saved in the book of Revelation.
Here is an experiment anyone can do that owns a bible. Open the bible and check for the copyright. When you find it, ask yourself how anyone could own the copyright of the supposed 'Word of God'?
The answer and conclusion should be very easy to recognise.

..... which shows that the Islamic religion was started by Roman Catholic Cardinal Lothar Schmalfuss, a Jew.
Which means that Cardinal Lothar Schmalfuss was a Jew of high rank within the Roman Catholic Church prior to 610, which was when he changed his name to Mohamed and wrote the Quran, forming the religion of Islam.
These are the references in case you overlook them within the post .....
(1) –“The World’s Religions” Lion Publishing, Pg. 315, 1994
(2) –“Catholic Encyclopedia” , i. 187, i, 620-1, x. 425
(3) –“Catholic Encyclopedia” , i. 187, i, 620-1, x. 425)
(4) –“Annales Ecclesiastici” , tome viii, Fol. Antwerp, 1597, Cardinal Caesar Baronius
(5) –“Ecclesiastical History”, Du Pin, vol. i, pg. 710
(6) –“The Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers”, Second Series. Edited by the Rev. Professor Roberts, D.D., and Principal James Donaldson, L.L.D., St.
(7) –“Catholic Encyclopedia” , 1908, Vol. IV. Pg. 583
(9) –Koran, Surah 4. (Did he know something the rest of us don’t know? Of course, Bushby’s theory is that “Jesus” had been stoned to death and not
crucified. But this statement can just as well suggest that there was no one to crucify anyway.)
(10) –“Encyclopedia Britannica, Macropedia, Vol. 12, Pg. 607
..... which includes the Catholic Encyclopedia.