TOPIC: Julius Evola, "the British Empire Was a Creature of Judaism," by Tanstaafl
Julius Evola, "the British Empire Was a Creature of Judaism," by Tanstaafl 08 Aug 2018 05:55 #1
The significance of the bone of contention over Jewish rule of Britain first came to my attention in Majority Rights Radio: Guessed worker speaks with Tanstaafl, and especially in the comments at MR afterward.
Months later I came across the issue again in Yockey on Culture and Race – Part 8 and Part 9. The “British” Empire is one of those elements of European history which resonates very strongly in the European psyche. Racialists tend to see it as an expression of Anglo-Saxon greatness.
The Jews have turned it into a cornerstone of their guilt-tripping about colonialism. Neither view accords with reality. The jews puppeteered the empire at the expense of Britons, just as today they puppeteer the colonization of Britain itself.
Evola’s assessment, excerpted below, was written in 1940, at which point Jewish parasitic infiltration and manipulation of Britain (from the top) was clear enough. Evola’s discussion of the precise who and how provides a welcome contrast to Yockey’s jew-blind account in 1948. Indeed, the false notion that Britons ruled Britain then, and even now, prevails exactly because the jews still rule.
[URL="http://thompkins_cariou.tripod.com/id34.html"]Disraeli the Jew and the Empire of the Shopkeepers[/URL]:
We know that, wherever economic interests predominate, the Jew rapidly rises and accedes to the commanding positions. The penetration of Judaism into England is not a thing of recent days alone. It was the English Revolution and Protestantism which threw open England’s doors. The Jews, who had been expelled by Edward I in 1290, were readmitted to England as a result of a Petition accepted by Cromwell and finally approved by Charles II in 1649.
From this time forward, the Jews, and above all the Spanish Jews (the Sephardim) began to immigrate en masse to England, bringing with them the riches which they had acquired by more or less dubious means, and it was these riches, as we have just explained, which allowed them to accede to the centres of command within English life, to the aristocracy and to positions very close to the Crown.
Less than a century after their re-admission, the Jews were so sure of themselves that they demanded to be naturalised, that is to say, to be granted British citizenship. This had a very interesting result : the Law, or Bill, naturalising the Jews was approved in 1740. Most of its supporters were members of the upper classes or high dignitaries within the Protestant Church, which shows us the extent to which these elements had already become Judaised or corrupted by Jewish gold.
The reaction came not from the English upper classes, but from the people. The Law of 1740 provoked such outrage and disorder among the populace that it was abrogated in 1753.
The Jews now resorted to another tactic : they abandoned their synagogues and converted, nominally, to Christianity. Thus the obstacle was circumvented and their work of penetration proceeded at an accelerated pace. What mattered to the Jews was to keep their positions of command and to eliminate the religious arguments on which the opposition of that period principally rested.
Everything else was secondary, since the converted Jew remains, in his instincts, his mentality, and his manner of action, entirely Jewish, as is shown by one striking example among many others : the extremely influential Jewish banker Sampson Gideon, despite having converted, continued to support the Jewish community and was buried in a Jewish cemetery. His money bought for his son an enormous property and the title of Baronet.
This was the preferred tactic of the rich Jews of England from the eighteenth century on : they supplanted the English feudal nobility by acquiring their properties and titles, and thus mixing themselves with the aristocracy, by the nature of the British representative system, they came closer and closer to the government, with the natural consequence of a progressive Judaification of the English political mentality.
From the inception of imperialism on the large scale, what was less apparent was that the ‘British Empire’ was a creature of Judaism, which a Jew had given as a present to the British Royal Crown.
This Jew was Benjamin Disraeli, Queen Victoria’s Prime Minister.Only one Jew could have conceived the idea of ‘reforming’ the conception of Empire and making of it something plutocratic and transforming it into imperialistic materialism. This Jew was Disraeli – ‘Dizzy’ as he was known. It was he who made of Queen Victoria an ‘Empress’, a colonial Empress, the Empress of India.
This indefatigable proponent of the English ‘Imperial’ idea modeled his conception upon the Jewish Messianic-imperial idea, the idea of a people whose power consists in the riches of others, over which they take power, and which they cynically exploit and control. Disraeli always attacked very violently those who wished to separate England from her overseas territories, within which, as a Jewish historian has pointed out, Jews were the pioneers.
Disraeli knew who it was that sustained this England which in turn was to dominate the riches of the world ; it is possible that he was among those initiates who knew that it was more than a simple British-Jewish plutocracy which was pulling the strings. One recalls those often-quoted words of Disraeli : “The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.”
The prudent and noiseless penetration of Jewry into the English upper classes and into the government itself continued. It was Disraeli who performed the coup upon Egypt in 1875 – with whose help? Rothschild. In 1875, the Khedive had financial worries and Disraeli managed to learn that he was willing to sell 177,000 shares of Suez Canal stock. This was a magnificent opportunity to gain certain control of the route to the Indies.
The government hesitated. Rothschild did not. Here is the record of the historic conversation between Disraeli and Rothschild (Disraeli had asked him for four million pounds sterling) : “What guarantee can you offer me?” “The British government.” “You shall have five million tomorrow.” The interest on the loan was ‘extremely low’ ; naturally, the real and important interest of the Jewish clique lay on another and less visible plane …
Disraeli did not fail to make more convenient to the Jews of England their ritual observance. A little-known fact is that the ‘English Saturday’ is nothing other than the Jewish Sabbath, the ritual day of rest of the Jews. It was suitably Disraeli who introduced it to England, under an adequate social pretext.
Thus, as the Judaification of old feudal England was accomplished by diverse means, and as the old aristocracy gradually decomposed and underwent inoculation with ideas which would make it an easy prey for the material and spiritual influences of Judaism and Freemasonry, Disraeli did not forget his other task, that of augmenting and reinforcing the power of the new ‘Empire of Shopkeepers’, the new ‘Imperial Venice’, the reborn Israel of the Promise.
This he did in a manner which was just as characteristically Jewish. Disraeli was one of the principal instigators of that sad and cynical English foreign policy by means of ‘protected’ third parties and the use of blackmail, which it pushes to the most extreme consequences. The most striking case is that of the Russo-Turkish War. Disraeli did not hesitate to betray the ancient cause of European solidarity, by placing Turkey under British protection.
Turkey, defeated, was saved by Britain ; by use of the well-known ‘English’ method of threats and sanctions, Disraeli was able to paralyse the Slavic advance to the South without a single shot being fired, and a grateful Turkey made him a present of Cyprus. At the Congress of Berlin, the Russian ambassador, Gortshakov, was unable to restrain himself from crying dolorously : “To have sacrificed a hundred thousand soldiers and a hundred million of money, and for nothing!” (*)
There is a factor even more serious, from a higher point of view. By virtue of this situation, brought about by Disraeli, Turkey was admitted into the community of the European nations protected by so-called ‘International Justice’. We say ‘so-called’ because, until that time, far from being held to be valid for all the peoples of the world, this justice was held to be valid uniquely among the group of the European nations ; it was a form of recourse and of internal law for Europeans.
With the admission of Turkey, a new phase of international law began, and this was truly the phase in which ‘justice’ became a mask and its ‘international’ character became a ruse of ‘democracy’, for it was simply an instrument in the service of Anglo-Jewry, and subsequently of the French also. This development led to the League of Nations, to crisis, and to actual war. #
User(s) who Liked this post: Return of Zorro
Julius Evola, "the British Empire Was a Creature of Judaism," by Tanstaafl 08 Aug 2018 10:35 #2
From the comments section in the links given above,
29 May 2014 at 6:07 pm
I really have no time for people like Guessedworker. At the beginning of the interview he said he was a coward about the Jews with no repentance for that state of mind. To say that the mark our civilisation is how we treat the Jews who are genociding the white race is outragious, the mark of our civilisation is that we survive as a people which we can only do by expelling the Jews. And to perpetuate the Holohoax is a disgrace. His invented term ‘Judaophobia’ just shows how far he is from the truth.
Standing up for Zion-fag kippah-wearing Holohoaxer and anti-nationalist Paul Weston is depressing. Weston bans anyone from his comments who even mentions the Jews in any but supportive terms. Jewish banksters and Zioncorporations who control Western politics and policies are bringing Muslims into Britain to genocide us. Paul Weston and Guessedworker are typical of the elite British middle class who turn a blind eye to that fact and actually regard Jews as English.
Cromwell brought the Jews back to England where they establised social-democracy and killed our king just as they deposed our king before the second world war. We have been enslaved ever since Cromwell.
I am an English nationalist let down by generations of Jew lovers and apologists for Jews and cowards who refused to stand up to the Jews and I regard Guessedworker at the end of the day as part of the problem. It was clear that he learned nothing from what you were trying to convey to him though he likes you no doubt.
The film he mentioned at the end was an anti-jihad Jew movie where the Jews are behind the Muslim-English war and by inference once more whites die to put them back in power. He praised EDL who are the missled street army of the Jews who fight the Muslims they don’t like while the Jews buy off the rest. Perhaps he has been of service to UKIP on newspaper comments, that’s all.
Who do you think Cicero was pointing to when he said,
A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.
For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.
Then again we enter a subject which I have covered several times before on TZ and what is called within the hive integrity of any colony let alone the honey bee hive, Namely "The Varroa Destructor", those interested please study how this parasite moves amongst any flourishing colony of worker bees, but not for very long as those colonies nearly always succumb to its presence.
That name again, "Varroa Destructor"
Another clue comes in the form of travellers sent out by the King of Pergamon, Tyre and several other leading empires, where they sent out their crafty men to collect everything a rising nation has within, gold, silver, languages, and everything about you, same group of individuals and Latet anguis in herba, that's who.
See who was William of Orange, from an ominous Orange Free State to be precise, and who still runs that state today via their masonic doctrine and system, the two houses of the lancerate are inseprable, go figure the legend and how she revolted about the taxes her husband put upon his people, is there a naked truth behind those who monitor our taxation laws and continually reinvent them from the days of old.
Two more clues are to be gleaned in the opening shot of this video, where the good animated myth anf personification is show together with a church in the backdrop, here many a Pogrom was instigated and acted upon by the people to wipe their slates clean of this virus/varroa called debts, and again who were in control of those contracts, you guessed it yet, the wealthy Jewish aristocracy and land owners, who always strip bare the fat of your lands that are currently in control by their hands.
There is real gold in those ghettos.
Last Edit: 08 Aug 2018 11:42 by Gan Anim.
Julius Evola, "the British Empire Was a Creature of Judaism," by Tanstaafl 08 Aug 2018 12:34 #3
Some interesting comments in the original post and in that age of treason link, too.
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. – Marcus Aurelius
Julius Evola, "the British Empire Was a Creature of Judaism," by Tanstaafl 08 Aug 2018 13:28 #4
Cromwell brought the Jews back to England where they established social-democracy and killed our king just as they deposed our king before the second world war. We have been enslaved ever since Cromwell.
The first stage of this long-term plan for Jewish empowerment began with Henry VIII.
I wondered how one man could apparently overturn all of the power of the Catholic church and steal all of its assets with apparent impunity, if not from a legal framework then at least from logistical one.
It turns out that Henry VIII's key advisor and the man who helped him set the legal framework for declaring himself head of the Church was Thomas Cromwell, actual ancestor of Oliver Cromwell.
It turns out that Thomas Cromwell spent many years in his youth travelling around Europe and in particular working in the service of Florentine banker Francesco Frescobaldi.
As an example, we were all taught that Oliver Cromwell was the "Great Benefactor" and "savior" of England. We will learn that those benevolent titles were given by the victor in the great battle that became the start of Mystery Babylon in which we live. Thomas Cromwell, a close relative and ancestor of Oliver, was the singular person who caused the first revolution of the 1500s in England.
The intellect, the charisma, the cunning, the brutality and the sinister mind of this man completely overwhelmed all of England, including King Henry VIII, parliament, and the common Englishman. He had a very receptive person to work with in King Henry VIII. The king was an overbearing, overweight and obnoxious individual who had dreams of playing god. Thomas Cromwell knew this and took advantage of it. In all probability he was sent back to England specifically to do what he did.
For you see, Thomas Cromwell was trained by the Venetian (Jewish) traders who were famous money lenders of the time. He was trained by Machiavelli and he carried Machiavelli's book, The Prince wherever he went. It was this book that trained his cunning and sinister mind. He was in the courts and lived in the manner of the families of the Borgias and the Medicis. He was a member of the Rosicrucians, an early occult organization that later became a part of the Freemasonry movement.
Thomas Cromwell returned to England and started loaning money to the poorer nobles, charging interest (usury) which is against God's Law. He titled himself a "scrivener," which is something between a money lender and an attorney. He became an influential and busy member of parliament and five years later, in 1528, he was able to convince the Catholic Cardinal Wolsey that he needed a man to oversee his business affairs with the various monasteries in England. It was the very job for which he had trained for so long.
He started suppressing the influence of the smaller churches and monasteries. Some of these had existed as Christian Churches long before the Roman Catholic Church came to England. Extensive writings of historians, both secular and Christian, reveal that the Christian church in England was started by Joseph of Armathea very soon after the Resurrection of our Savior.
User(s) who Liked this post: Return of Zorro