Your donations are appreciated and help keep this site running. Even the smallest amount helps.
Thankyou

 
PROMOTE YOUR SITE
HERE
Only $3 USD/month
TRUTHSPOON.COM
The man they can't recruit!
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
The place to discuss all things IT and Internet related. Computers, Devices, Phones, Storage, Hardware and Software, Browsers, Connections, Proxy Servers, Security, Troubleshooting and more.

TOPIC: The Google thread

The Google thread 17 May 2015 05:52 #41

  • zax
  • zax's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Gold Member
  • Posts: 5825
  • Likes received: 1560
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Google thread 24 May 2015 06:28 #42

  • zax
  • zax's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Gold Member
  • Posts: 5825
  • Likes received: 1560


:chuckle:
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Google thread 31 May 2015 09:01 #43

  • zax
  • zax's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Gold Member
  • Posts: 5825
  • Likes received: 1560
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Google thread 14 Jul 2015 16:57 #44

  • Daria
  • Daria's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Fresh Member
  • Posts: 163
  • Likes received: 81
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Google thread 20 Sep 2015 07:29 #45

  • Orangeaid
  • Orangeaid's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 11582
  • Likes received: 7946
Google Openly Admits To Manipulating Search Results To Conceal Jewish Supremacy

In a brazenly transparent move to conceal the reality of total Jewish ownership and control over Hollywood (not to mention mass media and the entire “entertainment complex” shaping American popular culture), Google is literally manipulating its search engine to remove “Jews” as the correct answer to the direct question: “Who runs Hollywood?”


Google on Friday removed a “direct answers” search result that replied “Jews” in response to the query: “Who runs Hollywood?”

The automatic first answer produced by the search also highlighted a link to a news story on the New Observer website headlined, “Jews Boast of Owning Hollywood—But Slam Gentiles Who Say the Same.” The site, which features sensationalist stories heavy on conspiracy theories, describes itself as “a free and independent news service designed to present current affairs without the spin of the controlled media.”

The same “Jews” answer was also produced for Google mobile searches, and also appeared when Google auto-completed a “Who Runs Hollywood?” search request.

News of the problematic result prompted a slew of headlines early Friday ridiculing Google. The Guardian, for instance, went with, “Who runs Hollywood? Google has an answer, but it’s not a good one.” The New York Daily News was straighter: “Who runs Hollywood? Google to fix search result that claims ‘Jews’ do.”


Google quickly issued a statement promising to deal with the problem, and noting “that the views expressed by such sites are not in any way endorsed by Google.” By Friday afternoon, Israel-time, the search was no longer producing the offensive result.

The problematic result did not appear to have been a function of deliberate outside skewing of Google’s algorithm, or Google bombing, but rather was evidently a consequence of lots of readers posing variations on the “Who Runs Hollywood?” question, and trending in relatively large numbers to the New Observer article and other like it.

Indeed, even after Google’s evident Friday recalibration, ordinary Google searches for the same question, “Who Runs Hollywood?” produced prominent links to such articles as “Travolta says Gay Jews run Hollywood” and “Is it true that Hollywood is run by Jewish people?” The top search results as of this writing, understandably, however, were several articles highlighting the whole “Who Runs Hollywood?” direct answers search result affair.

In the article, The Times of Israel staff note on two separate occasions that the correct answer provided by Google when asked “Who runs Hollywood?” – Jews run Hollywood, of course, by their own admission! – is a “problematic result,” and that the factually accurate answer provided by Google with numerous links demonstrating its veracity is “offensive.”

The Jews are openly admitting that the fact anyone, anywhere in the world with access to the Internet can type into Google (or other search engines for that matter) a simple question such as “Who runs Hollywood?” and be exposed to the reality of Jewish control, influence, and perversion of our society is both “problematic” and “offensive.” Indeed, the truth is both problematic and offensive to the Jews, because it undermines their nation-wrecking, anti-White, anti-Christian agenda. This explains why Jews try their hardest to prevent people from knowing the truth about them.

Can they be more obvious here folks?

The war being waged by organized Jewry against White Western Christian civilization rests entirely on us remaining either ignorant of Jewish power and influence and/or too intimidated to challenge, expose, or resist it. The Internet is eroding and undermining those factors on a daily basis.

Unsurprisingly, mainstream news outlets are describing the accurate answer provided by Google when asked “Who runs Hollywood?” as “anti-Semitic,” i.e., correctly describing the reality of Jewish power and influence over Hollywood and the mass media.



This once again demonstrates a central point I have been trying to communicate to the world: in the parlance of our times, the word “anti-Semitic” literally describes someone or something that accurately describes or articulates basics facts about Jews and their power, influence, and perversion of White Western Christian civilization. Stating basic, elementary facts about Jews, their agenda, their outrageous crimes and lies directed against their non-Jewish enemies, etc. is fundamentally “anti-Semitic.”

And people are starting to discover these essential facts for themselves, thanks largely to the Internet. The cat is out of the bag, and there is no getting it back in.
therealistreport.com/google-openly-admits-to-manipulating-search-results-to-conceal-jewish-supremacy/
Last Edit: 20 Sep 2015 07:37 by Orangeaid.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Google thread 20 Sep 2015 10:20 #46

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Commander Seclorum
  • Posts: 16214
  • Likes received: 7639
The Motherload :hahano:

Murdoch Murdoch is beautiful, Murdoch Murdoch is based
Murdoch Murdoch is beautiful, Murdoch Murdoch is based
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Google thread 16 Dec 2015 07:26 #47

  • ealltech
  • ealltech's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Fresh Member
  • Posts: 5
  • Likes received: 1
If you want to know more about how it works and the reasons why the developer created this solution see the video below. He also discusses the social changes that have resulted from our increasing dependence on new technologies.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Google thread 02 Aug 2017 07:30 #48

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Commander Seclorum
  • Posts: 16214
  • Likes received: 7639
In this extract from his new book When Google Met Wikileaks, WikiLeaks' publisher Julian Assange describes the special relationship between Google, Hillary Clinton and the State Department -- and what that means for the future of the internet.


Eric Schmidt is an influential figure, even among the parade of powerful characters with whom I have had to cross paths since I founded WikiLeaks. In mid-May 2011 I was under house arrest in rural Norfolk, about three hours’ drive northeast of London. The crackdown against our work was in full swing and every wasted moment seemed like an eternity. It was hard to get my attention. But when my colleague Joseph Farrell told me the executive chairman of Google wanted to make an appointment with me, I was listening.

In some ways the higher echelons of Google seemed more distant and obscure to me than the halls of Washington. We had been locking horns with senior US officials for years by that point. The mystique had worn off. But the power centers growing up in Silicon Valley were still opaque and I was suddenly conscious of an opportunity to understand and influence what was becoming the most influential company on earth.

Schmidt had taken over as CEO of Google in 2001 and built it into an empire.

I was intrigued that the mountain would come to Muhammad. But it was not until well after Schmidt and his companions had been and gone that I came to understand who had really visited me.

The stated reason for the visit was a book. Schmidt was penning a treatise with Jared Cohen, the director of Google Ideas, an outfit that describes itself as Google’s in-house “think/do tank.” I knew little else about Cohen at the time. In fact, Cohen had moved to Google from the US State Department in 2010. He had been a fast-talking “Generation Y” ideas man at State under two US administrations, a courtier from the world of policy think tanks and institutes, poached in his early twenties.

He became a senior advisor for Secretaries of State Rice and Clinton. At State, on the Policy Planning Staff, Cohen was soon christened “Condi’s party-starter,” channeling buzzwords from Silicon Valley into US policy circles and producing delightful rhetorical concoctions such as “Public Diplomacy 2.0.”

On his Council on Foreign Relations adjunct staff page he listed his expertise as “terrorism; radicalization; impact of connection technologies on 21st century statecraft; Iran.


Director of Google Ideas, and "geopolitical visionary" Jared Cohen shares his vision with US Army recruits in a lecture theatre at West Point Military Academy on 26 Feb 2014 (Instagram by Eric Schmidt)


It was Cohen who, while he was still at the Department of State, was said to have emailed Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey to delay scheduled maintenance in order to assist the aborted 2009 uprising in Iran.4 His documented love affair with Google began the same year, when he befriended Eric Schmidt as they together surveyed the post-occupation wreckage of Baghdad.

Just months later, Schmidt re-created Cohen’s natural habitat within Google itself by engineering a “think/do tank” based in New York and appointing Cohen as its head. Google Ideas was born.

Later that year the two co-wrote a policy piece for the Council on Foreign Relations’ journal Foreign Affairs, praising the reformative potential of Silicon Valley technologies as an instrument of US foreign policy.5 Describing what they called “coalitions of the connected,”6 Schmidt and Cohen claimed that

Democratic states that have built coalitions of their militaries have the capacity to do the same with their connection technologies. . . .

Read the rest: wikileaks.org/google-is-not-what-it-seems/
Murdoch Murdoch is beautiful, Murdoch Murdoch is based
Murdoch Murdoch is beautiful, Murdoch Murdoch is based
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Google thread 02 Aug 2017 10:26 #49

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Commander Seclorum
  • Posts: 16214
  • Likes received: 7639
Thats a serious read right there when you click on it ^

As for assange, well he is supposed to be the good guy, but I cant help but think revelation of the method. Ease it in. etc. And the "its ok someones doing something about it" thing, lets get back to watching x-factor or pewdiepie, whatever.
Murdoch Murdoch is beautiful, Murdoch Murdoch is based
Murdoch Murdoch is beautiful, Murdoch Murdoch is based
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Google thread 02 Aug 2017 18:47 #50

  • Lux Interior
  • Lux Interior's Avatar
  • Online
  • Senior Member
  • Do you know de way?
  • Posts: 1871
  • Likes received: 788
My first thought is why is Asaange opening up to this mans outfit, it strikes me as leaving the door open for a burglar. I'm reading the article, maybe it'll become clearer, or more opaque.
And why is the CEO of an online search engine strolling around Baghdad anyway?
liberabo te ab inferno
Last Edit: 02 Aug 2017 19:28 by Lux Interior.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Google thread 02 Aug 2017 21:41 #51

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Commander Seclorum
  • Posts: 16214
  • Likes received: 7639
Murdoch Murdoch is beautiful, Murdoch Murdoch is based
Murdoch Murdoch is beautiful, Murdoch Murdoch is based
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Google thread 02 Aug 2017 21:42 #52

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Commander Seclorum
  • Posts: 16214
  • Likes received: 7639
Lux Interior wrote:
And why is the CEO of an online search engine strolling around Baghdad anyway?

Well thats the point of the article isnt it, Google and the deep state have become one.
Murdoch Murdoch is beautiful, Murdoch Murdoch is based
Murdoch Murdoch is beautiful, Murdoch Murdoch is based
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Google thread 19 Aug 2017 06:48 #53

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Commander Seclorum
  • Posts: 16214
  • Likes received: 7639
Murdoch Murdoch is beautiful, Murdoch Murdoch is based
Murdoch Murdoch is beautiful, Murdoch Murdoch is based
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Google thread 23 Aug 2017 01:52 #54

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Commander Seclorum
  • Posts: 16214
  • Likes received: 7639
I just pulled the link buttons leading to the TZ twitter, facebook and google accounts ( + and youtube)

Not going to be putting any kind of energy whatsoever into those places anymore.
Murdoch Murdoch is beautiful, Murdoch Murdoch is based
Murdoch Murdoch is beautiful, Murdoch Murdoch is based
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Google thread 27 Aug 2017 15:09 #55

  • Orangeaid
  • Orangeaid's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 11582
  • Likes received: 7946
4 Chan are at them

Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Google thread 27 Nov 2017 22:01 #56

This weekend I discussed Wikileaks with somebody. I was always a sceptic of them, and tbh never read them because of that mindset. :emb:
It was pointed out to me in no uncertain terms that Wikileaks is actually the real deal :O

So I may have to bloody read some now :mad:
Last Edit: 27 Nov 2017 22:02 by entrangermercenary1.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
Moderators: novum, rodin, Flare
Powered by Kunena Forum

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it. Secure transactions via paypal.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2018 - May 2019, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 265 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 340 - Raised
( £ 265 GBP )
donation thermometer
100%
Updated
30th November 2018

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.