TOPIC: Chinese Spring comes late this year...

Top billing BBC News...



www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-29418179

So let's see, Russia has Ukraine, China has Hong Kong, and Israel has ISIS attacking its enemies

edit

oh, and EM is in overdrive, no doubt a mission

rodin wrote:
China has its own huge muslim problem which is developing at a fast rate in the Xinjiang region, do keep up

See what I mean.? On a mission...

The protests in Hong Kong have occurred as people are angry about restrictions Beijing has imposed on the process of the elections of the city’s leader.

People of the "Hong Kong Special Administrative Region" want to elect its chief executive by universal suffrage starting from 2017. But the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress ruled that candidates for the vote would have to be first approved by a nominating committee controlled by Beijing. Protesters argue that the measure contradicts true democracy.

HK citizens have always strongly fought for democratic rights and "freedoms". They have no army to tackle China ... they're part of China ... but they know how to protest.

Kick over a rock....

wakeupfromyourslumber.com/news/pro-beijing-media-accuses-hong-kong-student-leader-us-government-ties

rodin wrote:


What do you mean?

Fact is China has a much greater problem in the Xinjiang region, which has steadily become more volatile over the last few years.

rodin wrote: Doesn't surprise me at all Rodin.

I was listening to our BBC equivalent today and heard them shill the story of Chinese fear of democracy on the mainland.

The Chinese population by and large is very happy with their government and how things are for them in life. This generation has a far better life than the one before, and so will the next.

It doesn't surprise me at all that the US is behind this to try and start to destabilize China politically. I can't see that happening at all ... though the BS that gets spewed out by our MSM obviously wants to make us feel otherwise.

rodin wrote:
... hyping the CIA sponsored "muslim problem" in Xinjiang province. Border region to Russia.

A picture, no more words needed...




You know, their online brigades are the cockroaches of imperial loyal idiots.
Xinjiang is a muslim province.

Why is the US Navy practising for war with China?



www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-29547621

Hong Kong protests: Clashes as police clear road

Umbrella schtick



This story has top billing BBC right now, above ISIS, Ebola etc

www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-29623396

Australia is getting the same type of coverage ... to reinforce the rhetoric "communism is evil ... people want democracy".

Chinese communism is nothing like Soviet (Jewish) communism. Though the MSM brainwashing doesn't fill the sheep in on that.

The vast majority of Chinese people are happy with their life in China.

HK is different as it was a British colony ... but it's now part of China and no doubt anti-China sentiment is being whipped up by US shit stirring and payments to the young naive and idealistic ... which of course the MSM cover to show "unrest under the communist controlling government"

I think Britain is still butt hurt at losing HK ... and I'm sure that comes through in the BBC coverage at least.

CHINA’S MOST DANGEROUS MISSILE (SO FAR)

Robert Haddick

July 2, 2014 

Buried on page 40 of the Pentagon’s latest annual reporton China’s military power is a brief mention of the YJ-12, a recent addition to China’s portfolio of anti-ship cruise missiles (ASCM). The report notes that, “The new missile provides an increased threat to naval assets, due to its long range and supersonic speeds.” True, but in an understated way. In fact, the YJ-12 is the most dangerous anti-ship missile China has produced thus far, posing an even greater risk to the U.S. Navy’s surface forces in the Western Pacific than the much-discussed DF-21D anti-ship ballistic missile. The arrival of the YJ-12 is one more indication of how the U.S. Navy is falling further behind in the missile competition against China, exposing flaws in operating concepts that U.S. and allied commanders and policymakers have relied on for years.

According to a 2011 study that appeared inNaval War College Review, the YJ-12 ASCM has a range of 400 kilometers, making it one of the longest-ranged ASCMs ever fielded (and much longer than the 124 kilometer limit of the U.S. Navy Harpoon). Crucially, at 400 kilometers, Chinese attack aircraft will be able to launch the YJ-12 beyond the engagement range of the Navy’s Aegis Combat System and the SM-2 surface-to-air missiles that protect U.S. aircraft carrier strike groups. In the past, when adversary ASCMs were limited to 100 kilometers or less, a carrier strike group had more time to react with its own aircraft and defensive missiles. It also had the option of engaging enemy aircraft before they launched their ASCMs, and more redundancy to cope with such attacks. With its 400 kilometer range, the YJ-12 will greatly erode these previous advantages.

A realistic future scenario is an attack on two or more axes by two Chinese Flanker regiments (totaling 48 Su-30 MKK or J-11B Flanker fighter-bomber variants). These Flankers (roughly corresponding to U.S. Air Force F-15E fighter-bombers, capable of supersonic speeds, and possessing a combat radius of 1,500 kilometers) could each be armed with two to four YJ-12 ASCMs. Although the carrier strike group’s combat air patrol could shoot down a few of the Flankers before they launched their missiles, the strike group would still face the prospect of defending against over a hundred supersonic ASCMs approaching from several directions at a wave-top height. The group’s close-in air defenses would have less than 45 seconds to engage the missiles after they appeared on the horizon. The YJ-12s would employ a variety of sensor types to find their targets and execute dramatic cork-screw turns to evade final defenses. A study from the Naval Postgraduate School concluded that in past engagements of anti-ship missiles against alerted surface warships, 32 percent of the attacking missiles scored hits. If only five percent of such a saturation YJ-12 attack impacted targets, it would still be a bad day for the carrier strike group.

The prospective Flanker/YJ-12 combination, eventually capable of reaching targets up to 1,900 kilometers from China, is an even more serious problem for the U.S. Pacific Fleet than is China’s DF-21D anti-ship ballistic missile. That missile, still apparently not tested against a moving target at sea, relies on a fragile network of space-based observation and communication links that will be prime targets for the U.S. during a potential conflict. By contrast, an attack by China’s land-based Flanker regiments would be comparatively straightforward and would rely on overwhelming mass and brute force rather than an exquisite and likely fragile networked communication architecture for success.

Officials in the U.S. Navy are well aware of the missile threat their surface forces face. The Navy plans to win the future “outer air” battle well over the horizon from the carrier strike group by introducing new long-range air and missile defense capabilities to its surface forces. It also plans to network these sensors and weapons into a shared, cooperative “common engagement capability.” Components of this longer-range capability will include the new carrier-based E-2D early warning and control aircraft, the long-range SM-6 surface-to-air missile, the F-35C aircraft, and software that will share information among the various platforms. The Navy’s intent is to restore the status quo prior to the arrival of missiles like the YJ-12, namely the ability to shoot down enemy missile-carrying aircraft at longer ranges and well before they can launch their ASCMs.

We should hope that the Navy’s long-range network engagement plans succeed. But they seem susceptible to the same fragilities the Navy is counting on to thwart the DF-21D anti-ship ballistic missile and its required network architecture. Meanwhile, the simple brute force approach employing saturation ASCM attacks will benefit in the future from even longer-ranged ASCMs equipped with even better target seekers, a trend that has been in place for many years. In this competition, China’s land-based aircraft and missiles seem to possess the competitive cost and technology advantages.

The result is increasing doubts about the U.S. military’s long-standing operating concepts in the Western Pacific. And from those doubts could come increasing confidence by China’s military commanders and policymakers that they and not the U.S. will benefit from escalation during a potential future crisis. If that becomes the case, comparisons between 2014 and 1914 would be right on target.

Robert Haddick is an independent contractor at U.S. Special Operations Command. He writes here in a personal capacity. In September 2014, Naval Institute Press will publish “Fire on the Water: China, America, and the Future of the Pacific,” Haddick’s book on the rise of China’s military power and U.S. strategy in East Asia.
warontherocks.com/2014/07/chinas-most-dangerous-missile-so-far/

Jewish Faces in the Chinese Government



jewishfaces.com/china.html

The Jewish Origins of Mao’s Communist Regime in China

www.texemarrs.com/092010/triad_of_evil.htm

Hong Kong protests: Leader says 'external forces' involved

We can see though



www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-29681684

That's obvious isn't it? US shit stirring to try and destabilize.

Zero Hedge covers this story and provides Chinese evidence asserting the US State Department is behind "Occupy Central".
www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-10-01/us-secretly-egging-hong-kong-protesters