MrAnderson wrote:
Gaia wrote:
Good you show another side of this "conflict", Roastie.
I just talked with my mate who spends New Year in Beirut. Nice but expensive city with an enormous military presence unfortunately to handle the many refugees (no country in the world is so much affected by the nextdoor situation).
A friend of ours will go to Damascus soon, will be interesting to hear her firsthand story.
As usual, these conflicts are blown up (haha) in the Lame Stream Medias.
Most of us knew this syrian war was a nwo stunt from the start
We all ways knew syrian people were up against proxy nwo armies
Just like bosnia ... Libya .... And the rest
The " moderate rebels " were funded and armed by our own globalist traitors
We all knew this
And yet despite talking about it endlessly and vocally supporting assads right to govern the nation of syrians the typical bunch forget about this bit of the truth and pretend its only them who dont want to see anymore proxy invasions and the like
So glad syria is back in control of syrians and they can start to rebuild without the likes of macron obama and team clinton fucking with them constantly
Don't forget Prime Ministers Cameron and May in Britain, fucking up the lives of Syrians.
Afaik British SAS and "elite" troops are still in Syria..... fighting ISIS or helping them?
People power did have an effect in Britain in 2013. Alternative media wasn't as compromised then.
Britons didn't want to be involved in more conflict in the ME and huge numbers contacted their MP's to say
NO MORE WAR
The Zionist Prime Minister Cameron's motion for military intervention in Syria was defeated, much to his financial masters disgust.
Here are two Jews in Parliament debating about intervention in Syria (2013) ... same old ...
one right, one left, and both Lords of the Pedo Crown.
Sir Gerald Kaufman (Manchester, Gorton) (Lab): When the right hon. and learned Gentleman says that we know that Syria is the only country in the middle east that possesses stocks of chemical weapons, will he draw attention to the use by Israel of illegal chemical weapons in Gaza—white phosphorus? Surely Israel, too, has such weapons, and we should take that into account in looking at the spectrum.
Sir Malcolm Rifkind: Let us use another occasion, if we may, to debate these important allegations. The issue is that the Syrian Government themselves do not deny that they have massive stocks of chemical weapons, and therefore the issue is whether there is any credible argument that on this particular occasion, in a district controlled by the opposition, the opposition somehow had both the capability and the will, and indeed did carry out this attack.
publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmhansrd/cm130829/debtext/130829-0001.htm