Your donations are appreciated and help keep this site running. Even the smallest amount helps.
Thankyou

 
PROMOTE YOUR SITE
HERE
Only $3 USD/month
TRUTHSPOON.COM
The man they can't recruit!
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: How the Mueller probe began, uncovered and cracked by ML.

How the Mueller probe began, uncovered and cracked by ML. 20 Apr 2019 21:01 #1


The Mueller Investigation Began as a counter-Intel investigation to cover-up the Federal Agents murder of Seth Rich

The counter-intel investigation which became cross-fire hurricane and then lead to the Mueller investigation began with the murder of Seth Rich and then the subsequent DOJ - FBI attempt to cover up the true people motivating & ordering the murderers (Podesta - HC - DWS, Donna Brazile + the Federal Agents who did the shooting, the dirty guns for hire who did the shooting etc - a gun stolen from an FBI vehicle possibly used) and blame the DNC breach by Seth on the Russians, and then use the operation to attack, spy on and attempt to impeach Trump. Now you know how the Mueller probe began. Mueller also blames the Russians as being behind DC Leaks when in fact that site was created by an American, exposing both Democrat and Republican crimes.

Mueller claims the Russians used Facebook to interfere with the elections when in fact the majority of those adds were not seen, it was a very small amount of money invested and it was not an operation of the Russian government nor was it all pro Hillary and anti-Trump. Thus the entire Mueller report is lies upon lies written by the same people who wrote the Steele pee pee dossie.

THUS THE MUELLER REPORT IS THE MULE PEE PEE DOSSIE 2.0, EXPOSED.


The Mueller probe was actually a Nazi British Empire -five eyes spy operation to remove Trump via a coup-de-etat and is based upon lies upon lies. None of the Russian agents Mueller lists actually exist. The Russian Intel agency he blames is non-existent for years, Mueller is attempting to indict a ham sandwich and then throwing his crappy report to the pigs and dogs in Congress so they can pick-up his pile of b.s. to attempt to impeach Trump.

IT IS NOTHING MORE THEN A BUNCH OF DOGS HUNGRY TO GET TRUMP WHEN THEY IN FACT ARE BEHIND 9-11, BEHIND THE BRITISH COUP LEAD BY ARVINDER SAMBEI, THE CHIEF BRITISH CROWN PROSECUTOR BEHIND THE MUELLER CRIME SPREE, WHO ALSO HELPED ORGANIZE 9-11 TOGETHER WITH MOSSAD AND THEN COVER-IT UP. NOW YOU KNOW.

The Mueller probe was set-up to protect the crimes of Mueller and all those involved in the Uranium Crime Syndicate.

It was set-up so Huber could be set as a distraction, with the promise he would investigate when in fact he is a cover-up artist. The same with Horowitz and all SES agents involved. The entire probe is an operation to cover-up the crimes of Hillary, of Mueller, of the Podestas, of others, protect their crime syndicate and blame Trump for the very crimes they are guilty of. To cover-up the HC collusion with the Ukraine and Russia. To cover-up their Project Pelican crimes and many other crimes. Nazi Mueller is a liar and a cover-up artist and needs to be sent to jail for life, along with his DNC gang of criminals and those in Congress attempting to impeach Trump, who got in via voting fraud. Please see my videos on how a central AI rigs the elections.

Learn how the Mueller report is a pile of bs :

Please see these videos for more details on this:

(Nobody yet has been able to fully connect the dots to the Seth Rich murder however, except ML.)





Please see also the Mother Liberty busy - steemit page and links and posts here on this discussion forum.

Thank you,

Mother Liberty

Q-SOURCE-X
Last Edit: 20 Apr 2019 21:18 by Mother Liberty.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

How the Mueller probe began, uncovered and cracked by ML. 21 Apr 2019 13:41 #2

THE SWISS OCTOGON

BLACK NOBILITY

CIA

VATICAN

KNIGHTS OF MALTA

BRITISH EMPIRE

COUP-DE-ETAT

EXPOSED


Video exposing the coup-de-etat to take-out Trump & exposing the operatives behind it:

Desktop Recording March 23rd, 2019:



www.useloom.com/share/e0efad884d3b4c7181a6ff64dadce535

- The video explains all the players involved and how Mueller is at the center of the coup, working for the top British Crown Prosecutors involved in the coup to take-out Trump.


- IT ALL BEGAN WITH THE LEAK OF THE DNC BY SETH RICH WHICH EXPOSED THE CRIMES OF MANY IN THE U.S. GOVERNMENT. THIS BEGAN THE FAKE RUSSIA NARRATIVE AND LEAD TO A CASCADE OF AGENCIES, AGENTS, INFORMANTS, FALSE FLAGS, FAKE RUSSIA FOOTPRINTS COSTING THE AMERICANS MILLIONS ALL BECAUSE OF THE SETH RICH PEN DRIVE LEAK.


TRUMP NEEDS TO GIVE IMMUNITY TO ASSANGE TO TESTIFY ABOUT THE LEAK BY SETH RICH!

THIS WILL TAKE-DOWN THE NWO!



AS A RESULT, TRUMP NOW NEEDS TO GIVE IMMUNITY TO ASSANGE SO THAT HE CAN BE GIVEN IMMUNITY TO TESTIFY THAT SETH RICH WAS THE LEAKER, SO HE CAN THIS WAY USE THIS FINAL MOVE OF HIS CAREER TO BE FREE & SO WE CAN TAKE-DOWN THE NWO. THIS WILL NOT DAMAGE WIKILEAKS, AS IT IS HIS OWN EXCEPTION TO THE RULE OF NO RELEASE OF SOURCES, SO THAT HE HIMSELF CAN BE FREE AND SO THAT AS SAMPSON, HE CAN HELP US TAKE-DOWN THE NWO!

ENJOY!


(The video is processing and will be available shortly).

Please look at the description section of those two videos also, as they contain the links to all the other videos created here and explain the content of each.

Thank you,

Courtesy of

The Mother Liberty Busy Posts

The Q-SOURCE-X Alliance

The "Q" ever before there was a fake "Q".

The Rebel Alliance.

Last Edit: 21 Apr 2019 14:17 by Mother Liberty.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

How the Mueller probe began, uncovered and cracked by ML. 21 Apr 2019 14:12 #3

This is an act of war against We The People!

Please allow me to share some links with you on this, very relevant for all to be aware of:



ACT OF WAR - HIGH TREASON Against We The People!

busy.org/@motherlibertynow/act-of-war-high-treason-against-we-the-people



The Russia Hoax Comes Apart at the Seams!!

busy.org/@motherlibertynow/the-russia-hoax-comes-apart-at-the-seams




THE TREASON OF ROBERT J. MUELLER EXPOSED!!

busy.org/@motherlibertynow/the-treason-of-robert-j-mueller-exposed


Please ask if you have any questions.

Thank you,

Mother Liberty
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

How the Mueller probe began, uncovered and cracked by ML. 21 Apr 2019 15:16 #4

  • Firestarter
  • Firestarter's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Fresh Member
  • The Latin translation for “witch” = MAGA
  • Posts: 174
  • Likes received: 91
I've seen many ridiculous stories on Robert Mueller.
According to the Trump-supporting "mainstream" media - that Robert Mueller was selected to investigate "Russiagate" was a huge blow to President Donald, as Mueller is above corruption.
According to the Trump-supporting "alternative" media - Robert Mueller was selected to use all sorts of trickery to frame the Orange idiot.

The fact is that Robert Mueller has a history of covering up the crimes of the elite.
Robert Mueller didn't "find" information on:
Oleg Deripaska, who actually worked for the FBI when Mueller was its director.
The Russian Alfa Bank that was communicating with the Trump Organization and the Spectrum Health of the DeVos family (the in-laws of Trump's Health Secretary Betsy DeVos, the sister of Erik Prince).
Or the London headqueartered SCL Group that DID swing the votes in favour of Trump.

Robert Mueller was a school buddy of John Kerry.
John Kerry is a member of Skull & Bones, just like George W. Bush (Republican candidate for the 2004 Presidential election against Kerry), and Trump’s associates Stephen Schwarzman (CEO of Jacob Rothschild’s Blackstone) and Steve Mnuchin.

Following my summary of a long article that puts “special” cover-up artist Robert Swan Mueller III in the spotlight — who “is about as corrupt as they come, bending and twisting the law every which way necessary to serve the goals of those who provide him assignments” and focuses on framing Lyndon LaRouche.
My main problem with the article is that it paints Donald Trump as some sort of “hero”. I tried to find something similar, without the praises for Trump, but couldn’t find one.

In 1978, Dope, Inc.: Britain's Opium War Against America was published, by EIR and LaRouche.
In April 1982, Lyndon and Helga LaRouche travelled to India where they met with PM Indira Gandhi, along with scientists, parliamentarians, industrialists, and economists. LaRouche proclaimed the British system of Malthusian eugenics, primitive “sustainable development” and debt slavery. They condemned the policies of the World Bank and IMF as genocidal.

In May 1982, LaRouche met Mexican President Jose Lopez Portillo, and followed that meeting with a document “Operation Juarez”; a plan to reorganise the bankrupt world financial system.
LaRouche proposed that the countries of Latin America (Ibero-America) unilaterally declare a restructuring of their debts and the establishment of a new just monetary order. Including forming an International Development Bank among these nations to coordinate investments and trade expansion among the member countries.

In August, Lopez Portillo tried and failed to bring Argentina and Brazil in “Operation Juarez”.
In September 1982, Lopez Portillo (like LaRouche’s proposal) adopted credit controls on Mexico’s currency, nationalising the Mexican banking system, and announced a moratorium on Mexican debt.
Wall Street, the City of London, and intelligence agencies now targeted LaRouche and Lopez Portillo. Nonetheless, in October of 1982, in a speech at the UN, Lopez Portillo called for a new financial system, essentially along the lines LaRouche specified.

On 10 May 1982, Henry Kissinger held a speech at the Royal Institute for International Affairs where he declared himself to be a “British” agent of influence.
On 19 August 1982, Henry Kissinger sent a letter to FBI Director William Webster, demanding that LaRouche be investigated for “harassing” Kissinger.

On 27 August 1982, a Top Secret letter was sent from the British government to the FBI. That letter itself remains classified to this day.
The response by the FBI illustrates what was in the letter. On 24 September 1982, under the heading “Re: Lyndon LaRouche and the Executive Intelligence Review” FBI counterintelligence chief James Nolan responded as follows:
We would like to reiterate our conclusion that, while many of the harassment activities of the NCLC and the themes promoted by NCLC publications, such as EIR, are often propitious to Soviet disinformation and propaganda interests, there is no direct evidence that the Soviets are directing or funding LaRouche or his organization.

On 12 January 1983, the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board - David Abshire, Leo Cherne, and Edward Bennett Williams - demanded that an FBI investigation, under Executive Order 12333 be opened on LaRouche based on the “harassment” of Henry Kissinger and possible foreign funding.
Numerous counterintelligence investigations were launched, under Executive Order 12333 - infiltration, and counterintelligence “neutralization” tactics - farmed out to private entities with names, like Project Democracy, the National Endowment for Democracy, Freedom House, and the League for Industrial Democracy. These covert operations were used to create a criminal case against LaRouche. Many of these operations remain classified to this day.

John Train’s investment company partner, Thomas J. Devine, had partnered with George H.W. Bush in the Zapata Oil company in Texas.
The Train salons were attended by amongst others Roy Godson (connected to British intelligence and at the time consultant to the NSC); John Rees (of the FBI); Mira Lansky Boland (of the ADL); Richard Mellon Scaife; Pat Lynch (NBC); Dennis King (employed by the League for Industrial Democracy); Chip Berlet;
representatives of Freedom House (a CIA proprietary associated with PFIAB’s Leo Cherne); reporters for Reader’s Digest, Business Week, the Wall Street Journal, and the New Republic.

NBC repeatedly claimed that LaRouche’s whole War on Drugs consisted of insinuating that the Queen herself was on the street corner dealing heroin.
NBC’s Patricia Lynch even claimed that LaRouche had ordered the assassination of President Jimmy Carter by remote controlled bomb.

Following LaRouche’s 1984 Presidential campaign and a public claim by Kissinger that LaRouche would be “dealt with” after the election, William Weld opened a criminal investigation of LaRouche’s Presidential campaign committees, claiming that the campaign had engaged in credit card fraud.

In 1982, Robert Mueller joined the staff of U.S. Attorney William Weld in Boston, Massachusetts. Mueller and Weld concentrated on “corruption cases”, taking down the administration of popular Boston Mayor Kevin White in an investigation widely criticised for “Gestapo tactics”. In 1986, Mueller succeeded William Weld as acting U.S. Attorney, after Weld was chosen to head the Bush Justice Department’s Criminal Division.
Mueller chose John J.E. Markham II to head the LaRouche “investigation”. Markham had been a member of the Process Church of the Final Judgment, a satanic cult affiliated with Charles Manson.

Mueller employed some 400 law enforcement agents and privately owned armoured personnel to raid 2 office buildings in Leesburg, Virginia where EIR and other companies associated with LaRouche were located.
In 1992, one of the raid’s principals, Donald Moore, told an FBI informant that a plan was in circulation to provoke LaRouche’s security guards into a shooting incident at Ibykus Farm, where LaRouche stayed, and killing LaRouche. FBI case agent Richard Egan corroborated Moore’s account.
The plan to kill LaRouche was only aborted when his associates sent a telegram to President Reagan for “help”.

The subsequent trial in Boston, in which LaRouche was indicted for obstruction of justice, fell apart when FOIA documents showed secret covert operations being run against LaRouche - notably a document from Ollie North’s safe indicating extreme White House interest in players in the LaRouche case. Federal Judge Robert Keeton ordered a search of Vice-President Bush’s office.
Judge Keeton ruled a mistrial due to juror hardship. Jurors later told that they would have voted not guilty.
The Justice Department quickly opened a new massive LaRouche case before Judge Albert V. Bryan Jr. in Alexandria, Virginia. This was based on loan fraud and preventing the IRS from assessing taxes. LaRouche was the sole defendant charged in both of the two counts, and all defendants were convicted.

A national security informant infiltrated in the LaRouche security operation. He told LaRouche that he could use his contacts to stop the investigation. The notes made on this meeting were written down in their notebooks.
During the trial, John Markham used this for “evidence” that the defendants had conspired to obstruct justice.
Prosecution witnesses underwent “deprogramming” to prepare for testimony, and were granted numerous benefits never disclosed to the defence.
Markham and Mueller employed the ADL for witness interviews and used Dennis King as a consultant.

Former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark represented LaRouche on appeal. Clark said that the LaRouche case represented:
a broader range of deliberate cunning and systemic misconduct over a longer period of time using the power of the federal government than any other prosecution by the U.S. government in my time or to my knowledge.

In 1989, George H.W. Bush selected Robert Mueller to Main Justice to lead the case against Panamanian President Manuel Noriega.
To get the evidence together, Mueller bribed Latin America’s most notorious drug gangs with “get out of jail” free cards, if they would say that Noriega dealt drugs (and leave the Bush drugs syndicate unmentioned). According to reporter Glenn Garvin, Mueller plea bargained down a potential 1,435 years in prison for the drug traffickers, to 81 years. These deals included a $1.25 million bribe to members of the Cali Cartel and a deal with self-proclaimed Hitler worshiper Carlos Lehder Rivas, leader of the Medellin Cartel.

Mueller then ascended to head the Justice Department’s Criminal Division. Here he successfully covered up the drug, weapons, and terrorism activities of the notorious BCCI and BNL banks: larouchepac.com/20170927/robert-mueller-amoral-legal-assassin-he-will-do-his-job-if-you-let-him
(archived here: archive.is/wKA1q)
Donald Trump is very cozy with the Rothschild crime syndicate: www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1038&start=40#p4587
Last Edit: 21 Apr 2019 15:18 by Firestarter.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

How the Mueller probe began, uncovered and cracked by ML. 21 Apr 2019 16:33 #5

Firestarter wrote:
I've seen many ridiculous stories on Robert Mueller.
According to the Trump-supporting "mainstream" media - that Robert Mueller was selected to investigate "Russiagate" was a huge blow to President Donald, as Mueller is above corruption.
According to the Trump-supporting "alternative" media - Robert Mueller was selected to use all sorts of trickery to frame the Orange idiot.

The fact is that Robert Mueller has a history of covering up the crimes of the elite.
Robert Mueller didn't "find" information on:
Oleg Deripaska, who actually worked for the FBI when Mueller was its director.
The Russian Alfa Bank that was communicating with the Trump Organization and the Spectrum Health of the DeVos family (the in-laws of Trump's Health Secretary Betsy DeVos, the sister of Erik Prince).
Or the London headqueartered SCL Group that DID swing the votes in favour of Trump.

Robert Mueller was a school buddy of John Kerry.
John Kerry is a member of Skull & Bones, just like George W. Bush (Republican candidate for the 2004 Presidential election against Kerry), and Trump’s associates Stephen Schwarzman (CEO of Jacob Rothschild’s Blackstone) and Steve Mnuchin.

......................

Mueller then ascended to head the Justice Department’s Criminal Division. Here he successfully covered up the drug, weapons, and terrorism activities of the notorious BCCI and BNL banks: larouchepac.com/20170927/robert-mueller-amoral-legal-assassin-he-will-do-his-job-if-you-let-him
(archived here: archive.is/wKA1q)

Mueller, the DOJ, the FBI, the British Privy Council, the U.S. SCOTUS, the Federal Courts are all agents of the criminal Nazi British Empire banking cartel which via the proxy fake state of Israel use the Rothschild - Warburg - Vatican - Swiss Octogon - Knight of Malta, British Intel agents - Five Eyes to spy on the planet, deprive citizens of right, steal and plunder property, sue those who try to free humanity from this banking cartel, steal the wealth and resources of the planet, steal patents, create world wars, obstruct justice, protect their SES - SERCO - British Privy Council - URANIUM CRIME SYNDICATE PARTNERS IN CRIME and subvert the American Republic. This is their business. This is what SS HEIR NAZI MUELLER AND HIS SES GANG OF CRIMINALS ARE DOING IN THE U.S.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

How the Mueller probe began, uncovered and cracked by ML. 22 Apr 2019 14:48 #6

  • Firestarter
  • Firestarter's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Fresh Member
  • The Latin translation for “witch” = MAGA
  • Posts: 174
  • Likes received: 91
On 21 March 1892, the Chicago Daily Press published a dispatch from Wall Street, in which their henchmen were instructed:
We must proceed with caution and guard well every move made, for the lower orders of the people are already showing signs of restless commotion. Prudence will therefore dictate a policy of apparent yielding to the popular will—until all of our plans are so far consummated that we can declare our designs with out fear of any organized resistance. The Farmers' Alliance and Knights of Labor organizations in the United States should be carefully watched by our trusted men, and we must take immediate steps to either control these organizations in our interests, or to disrupt them. At the coming Omaha convention, to be held July 4, our men must attend and direct its movements, else there will be set on foot such antagonism to our designs as may require force to overcome. This, at the present time, would be premature; we are not yet ready for such a crisis.

Capital must protect itself in every possible manner, through combination and legislation. The courts must be called to our aid, debts must be collected, bonds and mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible. When, through process of law, the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and easily governed—through the influence of the strong arm of government—applied by a central power of imperial wealth under the control of leading financiers. A people without homes will not quarrel with their rulers. History repeats itself in regular circles; this truth is well known among our principal men now engaged in forming an imperialism of capital to govern the world. While they are doing this, the people must be kept in a condition of political antagonism. The question of tariff reform must be urged through the organization known as the Democratic party. And the question of protection, with reciprocity, must be forced to public view through the Republican party. By thus dividing the voters we can get them to expend their energies in fighting each other over questions of no importance to us, except as tethers to lead the common herd.
Thus, by discreet action, we can secure all that has been so generously planned, and thus far successfully accomplished.


Of course the same tactic of “political antagonism” is also used to derail internet forums.
Maybe the most disgusting strategy to derail forums I’ve seen so far, is simply starting a never ending array of “new” threads with mind numbing preposterous videos, and then repeatedly making posts in all of these ridiculous threads with links to the other troll threads...
Donald Trump is very cozy with the Rothschild crime syndicate: www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1038&start=40#p4587
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Gaia

How the Mueller probe began, uncovered and cracked by ML. 22 Apr 2019 16:49 #7

Those attempting to create order from the chaos they created obviously will not respond to comments, however I can ascertain the derailers liked their own comments. This is not surprising, given that many simply do not assimilate these concepts and would rather throw dirt, such as Defango, mud throwers, then have a reasonable debate. Rather then deal with the subjects at hand, they attempt to subvert by subtle infusion of cast doubt, a dispersing to the wind of a postulation which may lead to doubt. Sad state of affairs indeed.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

How the Mueller probe began, uncovered and cracked by ML. 09 May 2019 16:03 #8

  • annabelle
  • annabelle's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 2234
  • Likes received: 1563
So, from my understanding, the Mueller investigation into 'Russian collusion' was itself a witch hunt because it was largely based on a false 'Russian' dossier that had no basis in verifiable facts and was financed in part by Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign.

Because Mueller was given powers to charge anyone in it's probe of any type of criminal offenses, including such things as tax evasion, several people who were connected to Trump ended up being charged and convicted of crimes that had nothing to do with the false Russian dossier or 'Russian collusion'.

The Dem's used the Mueller investigation ... to scream to the high heavens for two years that Trump was guilty of Russian collusion and was an agent working for Russia and had their propaganda arms in the mass media to scream the same, for two solid years, even though there was no evidence to that effect and the Mueller witch hunt hadn't been concluded yet.

Upon conclusion of the Mueller investigation, a two year 40 million dollar probe that actually did delve into the dark depths of any type of possible collusion between Trump and Russian, it was put forth in the Mueller report that there was no Russian collusion and no provable obstruction of justice.

Keeping in mind as well that Trump as President of the United States, could have used executive privilege to put an end to the Mueller investigation including firing special counsel Robert Mueller.

Barack Obama invoked executive privilege to keep documents from Congress about the botched Operation Fast and Furious.

So the Mueller report was ended and the conclusions were put out to the mass public, no collusion and no chargeable/provable obstruction of justice.

The Dems and their propaganda arms in the mass media who had openly charged and convicted Trump publicly of being in collusion with Russia and/or of being a secret Russian agent could have apologized or kept silent due to embarrassment but no....

They decided to investigate the investigation.....because they didn't like the conclusion.

In a process that smacks of a modern day inquisition they asked the Attorney General of the United States, William Barr, America's top cop, to voluntarily answer some questions concerning the Mueller report and his four page summary of the investigation. Attorney General Barr did not have to make the Mueller report public (an investigation that he was not involved in), short of putting forth a summary of the investigations findings.

Instead of actually asking questions, some democrats used the opportunity of Attorney General Barr appearing before them voluntarily to answer questions, to launch a smear campaign against him to his face and slander him publicly. Barr did though respectfully answer the questions put to him.

For the next meeting scheduled the following day House Democrats insisting on using staff lawyers to question Attorney General William Barr...

“This is Bill Barr, who was doing nothing but talking about a report which he read which he had nothing to do with,” Wallace said on "America's Newsroom." “So the idea that you would need to get counsel to drill down on the Mueller report with the attorney general who just received the report and forwarded it on to Congress, I have to say it does sound and seem and look like a bit of a stunt.”

Wallace was referring to efforts to have staffer lawyers -- and not just sitting members of Congress -- question Barr
www.foxnews.com/politics/barr-stunt-chris-wallace

Attorney General Barr made it clear that if he was going to be grilled by staff lawyers and not sitting members of Congress, he was not going to appear, and he didn't have to since he was appearing voluntarily.

“I served on the Judiciary Committee for 11 years. I can recall no occasion where lawyers for the majority or the minority questioned a member of a president's cabinet under either party,” Pence said.
www.foxnews.com/politics/barr-stunt-chris-wallace

Dems took a fit and threatened to have him kidnapped/arrested by the Sergeant at Arms and forced against his will to appear before them even though that is not within the legal authority of the Sergeant at Arms. Besides this the Attorney General of the United States is under the 24/7 protection of the FBI.

What the Dems in the House Judiciary Committee wants is for Attorney General Barr to release the full unredacted version of the Mueller report to them. Only about 8% of the Mueller Report is still redacted for legal reasons as it is classified material pertaining to the Grand Jury.

The Mueller Report has been made available to the House Judiciary Committee as well as to the public in it's almost fully unredacted form. Again, what is still redacted is a small portion of legally classified information pertaining to the Grand Jury court hearings, witnesses and testimonies which remains redacted in order to protect the witness of the Grand Jury during the Mueller investigation.

It is illegal and a criminal offence to provide that information unredacted.

The Dems in the House Judiciary Committee are demanding that Attorney General Barr commit a criminal offence under threat of subpoena.

That is why President Trump has now invoked executive privilege over the matter.

Now it will be up to the courts to decide, which may take months or years.

This is what the democrats are terrified of....

Attorney General William Barr told the Senate Judiciary Panel this week that he has assembled a team at the Justice Department to probe whether the spying conducted by the FBI against the Trump campaign in 2016 was improper.

He suggested that he would focus on former senior leaders at the FBI and Justice Department.

“To the extent there was overreach, what we have to be concerned about is a few people at the top getting it into their heads that they know better than the American people,” said Barr.

Barr will also review whether the infamous Steele dossier – a collection of salacious and unverified claims against Donald Trump, assembled by a former British spy and paid for by the Clinton campaign – was fabricated by the Russian government to trick the FBI and other US agencies. (Will Barr investigate whether Steele made the whole thing up for his client, Fusion GPS?)

“We now know that he was being falsely accused,” Barr said of Trump. “We have to stop using the criminal justice process as a political weapon.”

On Thursday, Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) issued a criminal referral for Nellie Ohr – a former Fusion GPS contractor who passed anti-Trump research to her husband, then the #4 official at the DOJ.

On Thursday, Meadows said that Barr’s “willingness to investigate the origins of the Russia investigation is the first step in putting the questionable practices of the past behind us,” and that the AG’s “tenacity is sure to be rewarded.”

The FBI opened its counterintelligence investigation against the Trump campaign after a self-professed member of the Clinton Foundation, Joseph Mifsud, fed Papadopoulos the rumor that Russia had “dirt” on Clinton. That rumor would be coaxed out of the former Trump aide by another Clinton-connected individual – Australian diplomat Alexander Downer, who would notify authorities of Papadopoulos’ admission, officially launching the investigation.

Barr says he wants to get to the bottom of it.

His review will examine the above chain of events that set the investigation into motion, and whether any US agencies were engaged in spying on or investigating the Trump campaign before the probe was officially launched.

Barr said he’s working with FBI Director Christopher Wray “to reconstruct exactly what went down.” He said he has “people in the department helping me review the activities over the summer of 2016.”

Notably, Barr said his aides will be “working very closely” with the Justice Department’s inspector general, Michael Horowitz.

Horowitz is conducting his own investigation into the origins of the Russia investigation and whether there were abuses when the FBI obtained a secret warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in October 2016 to spy on another foreign policy adviser to the campaign, Carter Page.


Barr will also investigate when the DOJ and FBI knew that the Democratic Party and Clinton was Steele.

More subterfuge, or is this really happening?
thewatchtowers.org/barr-launches-wide-ranging-probe-into-2016-fbi-spying-zero-hedge/

quote
The last time Congress used its inherent contempt powers was in 1934 when the Senate held William MacCracken, a former member of Herbert Hoover's administration, after he refused a subpoena. The Senate had nowhere to hold MacCracken so he was imprisoned at a hotel.

But Congress has voted on contempt charges more recently, even discussing using it against members of the Trump administration last year after former White House adviser Steve Bannon refused to answer questions.

Other examples include in 2012 when the House voted to hold then-Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt for declining to provide documents in the Fast and Furious Operation and in 2014 after IRS official Lois Lerner invoked her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination during a congressional hearing. In both cases, the Justice Department declined to bring criminal cases.
www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/05/03/contempt-congress-william-barr-democrats/3647317002/

United States President Donald Trump IS guilty of collusion.........................................with Israel

And so is the vast majority of the the U.S. Congress and Senate, on all sides.

To see the day when there would be a massive investigation into the illegal and treasonous long-running collusion between members of the U.S. government and the foreign state of Israel.

The United States very real collusion with the State of Israel has cost an untold amount of American lives and the lives of people the world over.
Last Edit: 09 May 2019 16:19 by annabelle.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

How the Mueller probe began, uncovered and cracked by ML. 11 May 2019 14:01 #9

  • annabelle
  • annabelle's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 2234
  • Likes received: 1563
On the DNC leak, Mueller started with the prejudice that it was “the Russians” and he deliberately and systematically excluded from evidence anything that contradicted that view.

He did not commission any forensic examination of the DNC servers. He did not interview Bill Binney. He did not interview Julian Assange. His failure to do any of those obvious things renders his report worthless.

There has never been, by any US law enforcement or security service body, a forensic examination of the DNC servers, despite the fact that the claim those servers were hacked is the very heart of the entire investigation. Instead, the security services simply accepted the “evidence” provided by the DNC’s own IT security consultants, Crowdstrike, a company which is politically aligned to the Clintons.

That is precisely the equivalent of the police receiving a phone call saying:

“Hello? My husband has just been murdered. He had a knife in his back with the initials of the Russian man who lives next door engraved on it in Cyrillic script. I have employed a private detective who will send you photos of the body and the knife. No, you don’t need to see either of them.”

There is no honest policeman in the world who would agree to that proposition, and neither would Mueller were he remotely an honest man.

Two facts compound this failure.

The first is the absolutely key word of Bill Binney, former Technical Director of the NSA, the USA’s $14 billion a year surveillance organisation. Bill Binney is an acknowledged world leader in cyber surveillance, and is infinitely more qualified than Crowdstrike. Bill states that the download rates for the “hack” given by Crowdstrike are at a speed – 41 Megabytes per second – that could not even nearly be attained remotely at the location: thus the information must have been downloaded to a local device, eg a memory stick. Binney has further evidence regarding formatting which supports this.

Mueller’s identification of “DC Leaks” and “Guccifer 2.0” as Russian security services is something Mueller attempts to carry off by simple assertion.

Mueller shows DNC Leaks to have been the source of other, unclassified emails sent to Wikileaks that had been obtained under a Freedom of Information request and then Mueller simply assumes, with no proof, the same route was used again for the leaked DNC material.

His identification of the Guccifer 2.0 persona with Russian agents is so flimsy as to be laughable.

Nor is there any evidence of the specific transfer of the leaked DNC emails from Guccifer 2.0 to Wikileaks. Binney asserts that had this happened, the packets would have been instantly identifiable to the NSA.

Bill Binney is not a “deplorable”. He is the former Technical Director of the NSA. Mike Pompeo met him to hear his expertise on precisely this matter. Binney offered to give evidence to Mueller. Yet did Mueller call him as a witness? No. Binney’s voice is entirely unheard in the report.

Mueller’s refusal to call Binney and consider his evidence was not the action of an honest man.

The second vital piece of evidence we have is from Wikileaks Vault 7 release of CIA material, in which the CIA themselves outline their capacity to “false flag” hacks, leaving behind misdirecting clues including scraps of foreign script and language. This is precisely what Crowdstrike claim to have found in the “Russian hacking” operation.

So here we have Mueller omitting the key steps of independent forensic examination of the DNC servers and hearing Bill Binney’s evidence. Yet this was not for lack of time. While deliberately omitting to take any steps to obtain evidence that might disprove the “Russian hacking” story, Mueller had boundless time and energy to waste in wild goose chases after totally non-existent links between Wikileaks and the Trump campaign, including the fiasco of interviewing Roger Stone and Randy Credico.

It is worth remembering that none of the charges against Americans arising from the Mueller inquiry have anything to do with Russian collusion or Trump-Wikileaks collusion.

The charges all relate to entirely extraneous matters dug up, under the extraordinary US system of “Justice”, to try to blackmail those charged with unrelated crimes turned up by the investigation, into fabricating evidence of Russian collusion.

The official term for this process of blackmail is of course “plea-bargaining.”

Mueller’s failure to examine the servers or take Binney’s evidence pales into insignificance compared to his attack on Julian Assange.

Based on no conclusive evidence, Mueller accuses Assange of receiving the emails from Russia. Most crucially, he did not give Assange any opportunity to answer his accusations. For somebody with Mueller’s background in law enforcement, declaring somebody in effect guilty, without giving them any opportunity to tell their side of the story, is plain evidence of malice.

Inexplicably, for example, the Mueller Report quotes a media report of Assange stating he had “physical proof” the material did not come from Russia, but Mueller simply dismisses this without having made any attempt at all to ask Assange himself.

It is also particularly cowardly as Julian was and is held incommunicado with no opportunity to defend himself. Assange has repeatedly declared the material did not come from the Russian state or from any other state.

He was very willing to give evidence to Mueller, which could have been done by video-link, by interview in the Embassy or by written communication. But as with Binney and as with the DNC servers, the entirely corrupt Mueller was unwilling to accept any evidence which might contradict his predetermined narrative.

Mueller’s section headed “The GRU’s Transfer of Stolen Material to Wikileaks” is a ludicrous farrago of internet contacts between Wikileaks and persons not proven to be Russian, transferring material not proven to be the DNC leaks.

It too is destroyed by Binney and so pathetic that, having pretended he had proven the case of internet transfer, Mueller then gives the game away by adding “The office cannot rule out that stolen documents were transferred by intermediaries who visited during the summer of 2016".

He names Mr Andrew Muller-Maguhn as a possible courier. Yet again, he did not ask Mr Muller-Maguhn to give evidence. Nor did he ask me, and I might have been able to help him on a few of these points.

To run an “investigation” with a pre-determined idea as to who are the guilty parties, and then to name and condemn those parties in a report, without hearing the testimony of those you are accusing, is a method of proceeding that puts the cowardly and corrupt Mr Mueller beneath contempt.

Mueller gives no evidence whatsoever to back up his simple statement that Seth Rich was not the source of the DNC leak.

He accuses Julian Assange of “dissembling” by referring to Seth Rich’s murder. It is an interesting fact that the US security services have shown precisely the same level of interest in examining Seth Rich’s computers that they have shown in examining the DNC servers.

It is also interesting that this murder features in a report of historic consequences like that of Mueller, yet has had virtually no serious resource put into finding the killer.

Mueller’s condemnation of Julian Assange for allegedly exploiting the death of Seth Rich, would be infinitely more convincing if the official answer to the question “who murdered Seth Rich?” was not “who cares?”.

www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-05-09/craig-murray-real-muellergate-scandal
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
Moderators: novum, rodin, Flare
Powered by Kunena Forum

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it. Secure transactions via paypal.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2019 - May 2020, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 278 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 160 - Raised
( £ 130 GBP )
donation thermometer
47%
Updated
2nd October 2019

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.