Your donations are appreciated and help keep this site running. Even the smallest amount helps.
Thankyou

 
PROMOTE YOUR SITE
HERE
Only $3 USD/month
TRUTHSPOON.COM
The man they can't recruit!
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2

TOPIC: jewish Lawyers Are Targeting Bitchute for Termination

jewish Lawyers Are Targeting Bitchute for Termination 06 Nov 2020 07:54 #1

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Online
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 16381
  • Likes received: 6110

jewish Lawyers Are Targeting Bitchute for Termination


November 5, 2020 Kyle



Let me be frank, I do not exactly love Bitchute. It’s UI is alright, but their search feature is terrible and the MGTOW, jew shill and Trumptard videos featured on there are a bit annoying. They also have been blocking videos from being seen in whole countries once a complaint is received, making it really easy for jewish supremacists to continue censoring any opposing viewpoints into oblivion.

That being said, it is one of the only decent video sharing sites on the internet that actually allows our content to be hosted there. I frequently browse the videos there to find new content and use it all the time to embed videos on the Tribune. It obviously displeases the jewish overlords to see that people are still able to share videos after being banned from Youtube jewtube.

Bitchute is now coming under some serious fire. Its third-party app was just banned by Google jewgle this week. Now jewish lawyers in the UK jewK are trying to ensure that no one can watch the content on Bitchute.

From JNS:

According to pro-Israel lawyers and activists, in the context of rising anti-Semitism, public access to this platform and the site’s active promotion of anti-Semitism are cause for major alarm. Recently, social-media companies are being pressured to clean their platforms of hate speech and adopt the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism, but this has led anti-Semites and white supremacists to look for other places to share their content.



They say that Bitchute “has become a safe haven for neo-Nazis, hosting racist, violent and anti-Semitic videos that are later posted on social media.” The JNS article points to some over-the-top “anti-semitic” content that was probably posted by jewish groups themselves in order to discredit the entire site.


BitChute also hosts Holocaust-denying videos, including one called “We really have to gas the kikes this time,” which says (over pictures of Auschwitz), “Aren’t you all sick of blaming Nazis … Don’t you understand history is warped by the Jews … you should all know by now we gassed no Jews … the only victors of world war II they were Jews.”


They cannot have any truth about the holocaust and the jewish White genocide agenda being exposed, now can they?

jewish supremacists will complain all day about how any content that criticizes them is actually inciting violence and could lead to another Shoah, while they use their mass media machine to constantly vilify White people, blaming all the world’s problems on their most hated target.


Director of UK Lawyers for Israel, Caroline Turner, maintained that online anti-Semitism promotes and incites hatred of Jewish people, and even violence against Jews. “It twists the truth, contains blatant lies and promotes conspiracy theories suggesting that Jews are the cause of various evils in the world,” she told JNS.

“There is no specific law against anti-Semitism in the United Kingdom, although there are more general laws about sending grossly offensive and menacing messages, and stirring up racial hatred. If the person who uploaded the offensive material was based in England or Wales, and traceable, then it is possible to report their behavior to the police,” she explained, adding that there has been a precedence of prosecuted individuals who have sent anti-Semitic messages over social media, though they have been few and far between.



She thinks far more people need to be thrown into prisons gulags jewlags because they said “mean” (truthful) things online about her chosen tribe.


“It is truly shocking that there is so much anti-Semitic material online and on social media, and really that there have been so few convictions. History has shown that this is a dangerous trend, and it really must be stopped. If offenses are being committed, we call on the police to prosecute them, and hopefully, this will deter other from this behavior,” she said.


It is truly shocking that jews have been kicked out of White countries so many damn times for lording over us as twisted tyrants and they think that somehow it will be different this time if they can only silence enough people.

Gideon Falter, chief executive of British NGO Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA), explained that “over the past several years, we have seen an exponential growth in anti-Semitic abuse on social-media platforms, including mockery and denial of the Holocaust, anti-Jewish incitement and endless antisemitic tropes from the far-right and the far-left.”


Perhaps the jewish supremacists need to take a good hard look in the mirror and realize that they are kvetching about “problems” they created through their own subversive and criminal behaviors, and that they only real way to curb “anti-semitism” is to stop acting like jewish supremacists, but do not hold your breath on this ever happening.

“The popularity of anti-Semitic tropes and conspiracy theories are a wake-up call,” said Falter. “Social-media companies have a responsibility to clamp down on such gratuitous and dangerous racism on their platforms, and we will continue to press them to act.”


We have been winning the information war despite all their censorship and this really pisses them off. The “anti-semitic” genie is out of the bottle and he’s not going back in.


www.renegadetribune.com/jewish-lawyers-are-targeting-bitchute-for-termination/
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

jewish Lawyers Are Targeting Bitchute for Termination 06 Nov 2020 15:40 #2

  • MrAnderson
  • MrAnderson's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • BOXING FOR PEACE
  • Posts: 4559
  • Likes received: 1706
Hmm thats odd

This past couple of weeks at least 4 forum members have been very concerned about censorship

Not so much in this thread ey
isaiah 47 : 10

10 You felt secure in your wickedness;
you said, “No one sees me”;
your wisdom and your knowledge led you astray,
and you said in your heart,
“I am, and there is no one besides me.”
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Flare

jewish Lawyers Are Targeting Bitchute for Termination 06 Nov 2020 16:59 #3

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Online
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 16381
  • Likes received: 6110
MrAnderson wrote:
Hmm thats odd

This past couple of weeks at least 4 forum members have been very concerned about censorship

Not so much in this thread ey

Remarkable isn’t it?

When a few troll posts here get (re)moved all the leftists start crying and screaming like hell.


Yet when entire, huge internet-platforms are being censored or taken down you don’t hear them say a single word about it.


These people are a complete waste of oxygen.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

jewish Lawyers Are Targeting Bitchute for Termination 07 Nov 2020 22:31 #4

  • MrAnderson
  • MrAnderson's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • BOXING FOR PEACE
  • Posts: 4559
  • Likes received: 1706
JWO in full swing now ey

What will be interesting to watch is just how many people start to position themselves as friends of the Jews as they enact the Noahide shit

Me personally Im not kneeling before anyone or anything but God

Looking forward to the chance
isaiah 47 : 10

10 You felt secure in your wickedness;
you said, “No one sees me”;
your wisdom and your knowledge led you astray,
and you said in your heart,
“I am, and there is no one besides me.”
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: OpenMind

jewish Lawyers Are Targeting Bitchute for Termination 08 Nov 2020 09:39 #5

  • Ugh
  • Ugh's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Name is Mick, Age 72, right winger, Christian, English
  • Posts: 3946
  • Likes received: 449
Just to digress slightly, Israel and jews LOVE Trump to bits, so if jews control America, why haven't they been able to stop Biden becoming President?
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

jewish Lawyers Are Targeting Bitchute for Termination 08 Nov 2020 11:04 #6

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Online
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 16381
  • Likes received: 6110
Ugh wrote:
Just to digress slightly, Israel and jews LOVE Trump to bits, so if jews control America, why haven't they been able to stop Biden becoming President?

Because they control BOTH presidential candidates.

American politics is completely controlled by the jews:


:right: truth-zone.net/forum/government-and-authority/73358-yes-there-is-a-world-zionist-congress.html
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

jewish Lawyers Are Targeting Bitchute for Termination 08 Nov 2020 22:01 #7

  • Ugh
  • Ugh's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Name is Mick, Age 72, right winger, Christian, English
  • Posts: 3946
  • Likes received: 449
Flare wrote:
Because they control BOTH presidential candidates.
American politics is completely controlled by the jews:


Obama and Biden gave Iran the go-ahead to build a nuclear industry, and Israel didn't like it.
Then Trump scrapped the deal and the Israelis LURVED him to bits-



But now Biden is going to bring the deal back, and if Israel is happy with it so am I..:)
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

jewish Lawyers Are Targeting Bitchute for Termination 08 Nov 2020 23:04 #8

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Online
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 16381
  • Likes received: 6110
 


It don't matter to the jews who becomes president of the US, as they control all the media, all the politicians and all the finances of the US.

Haven't you learnt that by now Ugh?
Last Edit: 08 Nov 2020 23:08 by Flare.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

jewish Lawyers Are Targeting Bitchute for Termination 08 Nov 2020 23:22 #9

  • Ugh
  • Ugh's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Name is Mick, Age 72, right winger, Christian, English
  • Posts: 3946
  • Likes received: 449
Flare wrote:
It don't matter to the jews who becomes president of the US, as they control all the media, all the politicians and all the finances of the US.
Haven't you learnt that by now Ugh?


So when Biden says he's going to give Iran the go-ahead to build nukes, have the Israelis controlled him into saying that?
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

jewish Lawyers Are Targeting Bitchute for Termination 09 Nov 2020 00:02 #10

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Online
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 16381
  • Likes received: 6110
Ugh wrote:
Flare wrote:
It don't matter to the jews who becomes president of the US, as they control all the media, all the politicians and all the finances of the US.
Haven't you learnt that by now Ugh?


So when Biden says he's going to give Iran the go-ahead to build nukes, have the Israelis controlled him into saying that?


Absolutely.


:right: Everything you need to know about Joe Biden’s Jewish relatives
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

jewish Lawyers Are Targeting Bitchute for Termination 09 Nov 2020 16:30 #11

  • Ugh
  • Ugh's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Name is Mick, Age 72, right winger, Christian, English
  • Posts: 3946
  • Likes received: 449
Let me spell it out-
Muslims hate jews.
Biden is going to let muslim Iran build nukes.
Why on earth would jews want to control Biden into doing that?
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

jewish Lawyers Are Targeting Bitchute for Termination 09 Nov 2020 17:14 #12

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Online
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 16381
  • Likes received: 6110
Ugh wrote:
Let me spell it out-
Muslims hate jews.
Biden is going to let muslim Iran build nukes.
Why on earth would jews want to control Biden into doing that?


Let's hear it from the horse's mouth now shall we?


"You Dont Have To Be Jewish To Be A Zionist"




:arowup: scroll to 00:25
Last Edit: 09 Nov 2020 17:15 by Flare.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

jewish Lawyers Are Targeting Bitchute for Termination 09 Nov 2020 17:24 #13

  • Exorcist
  • Exorcist's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 1775
  • Likes received: 650
Ugh wrote:
Let me spell it out-
Muslims hate jews.
Biden is going to let muslim Iran build nukes.
Why on earth would jews want to control Biden into doing that?

@Ughy Wughy

Nuclear Bombs are a Jewish Hoax you Cupid Stunt.!!!...... :lmao:
NUKES ARE A HOAX
TRUTH IS HATE FOR THOSE THAT HATE THE TRUTH
Meet the New Boss.....Same as the Old Boss

http://www.stopthecrime.net/Henry-Makow---Illuminati----(2008).PDF
(((ROCCO))) is a Sayanim Troll
(((HotRod))) is a (((ROCCO))) sock account
MrAnderson is a Bollock….lmao
Last Edit: 09 Nov 2020 20:55 by Exorcist.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

jewish Lawyers Are Targeting Bitchute for Termination 09 Nov 2020 20:21 #14

  • Ugh
  • Ugh's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Name is Mick, Age 72, right winger, Christian, English
  • Posts: 3946
  • Likes received: 449
Guys, guys, you're always saying jews control everything, but TZ is an anti-jewish neo-nazi forum, so why haven't the jews got TZ shut down long ago?
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

jewish Lawyers Are Targeting Bitchute for Termination 09 Nov 2020 23:05 #15

  • Voltaire
  • Voltaire's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 3645
  • Likes received: 2198
TZ is small fry - but have you noticed how many yt channels have been terminated - even some bitchute chanels are unavailable in uk - tho bitchute blocked them probably out of anxiety of the growing semite pressure to censor everything jews dont likje ie truth.


Truth is anti-semitic
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Flare

jewish Lawyers Are Targeting Bitchute for Termination 10 Nov 2020 10:31 #16

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 18581
  • Likes received: 8732
Ugh wrote:
Guys, guys, you're always saying jews control everything, but TZ is an anti-jewish neo-nazi forum, so why haven't the jews got TZ shut down long ago?

I remember the good old days, when 90+ year olds in nursing homes lived forever. Darn this pesky virus.

1365 = 1

1.1365 = 1,283,305,580,313,352
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

jewish Lawyers Are Targeting Bitchute for Termination 10 Nov 2020 11:35 #17

  • Ugh
  • Ugh's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Name is Mick, Age 72, right winger, Christian, English
  • Posts: 3946
  • Likes received: 449
Voltaire wrote:
TZ is small fry - but have you noticed how many yt channels have been terminated - even some bitchute chanels are unavailable in uk - tho bitchute blocked them probably out of anxiety of the growing semite pressure to censor everything jews dont likje ie truth.


What exactly IS the truth about the jews?
As i've said before we're all well-fed, well-housed and well off with good comfortable lifestyles and I don't see any evidence that the jews are trying to mess us up.
The biggest threat to us are mad dog muslims who bomb us, shoot us, stab us and behead us.

Last Edit: 10 Nov 2020 11:41 by Ugh.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

jewish Lawyers Are Targeting Bitchute for Termination 10 Nov 2020 14:48 #18

Ugh wrote:
What exactly IS the truth about the jews?
As i've said before we're all well-fed, well-housed and well off with good comfortable lifestyles and I don't see any evidence that the jews are trying to mess us up.

so the conspiracy world has been speaking for a long time about the existence of a clique in wall street that control not only the major commercial banks but also the central banks. That clique is made up of inter-married families such as the rothschilds, rockefellers, warburgs, schiffs, harrimans, lehmans, oppenheims, israel moses seifs, kuhns and loebs etc

Their influence has been traced to the starting of the bolshevik revolution and the resultant two world wars that caused untold damage and deaths. Their hand has also been discearned pulling strings on both sides of the 'cold war' and they have also been implicated in the creation of the state of israel and in the oil wars in the middle east culminating in a 'war on terror' that was kick started after 911 which they have also allegedly caused.

911 then saw western nations turn into surveillance states. Meanwhile those same wallstreet/corporate interests have been building china up into a powerhouse that they are using as a testbed for their technocratic systems of control such as facial recognition, social credit scores and so on.

This covid plandemic is also being laid at their feet as it is clearly being used as the vehicle through which the western nations can now be transformed into china-style technocracies
Ugh wrote:
The biggest threat to us are mad dog muslims who bomb us, shoot us, stab us and behead us.

If you look into the history of wahabbism ie extremist islam you will find the same zionist interests mentioned above as being the creators of modern islamic extremism which is used as the new bogeyman to create a perpetual state of emergency within which the rights and freedoms of westerners can be constantly stripped away
Ugh wrote:
Chruchill actually wrote a newspaper article about how the two strands of zionism and bolshevism were fighting over the soul of the jewish people. You should read it and educate yourself
Last Edit: 10 Nov 2020 14:57 by iamawaveofthesea.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

jewish Lawyers Are Targeting Bitchute for Termination 10 Nov 2020 19:23 #19

  • Ugh
  • Ugh's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Name is Mick, Age 72, right winger, Christian, English
  • Posts: 3946
  • Likes received: 449
iamawaveofthesea wrote:
Chruchill actually wrote a newspaper article about how the two strands of zionism and bolshevism were fighting over the soul of the jewish people. You should read it and educate yourself


Like I've said before I'm well-fed, well-housed and well off, so if the jews are responsible for that they deserve a medal..:)
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

jewish Lawyers Are Targeting Bitchute for Termination 10 Nov 2020 20:26 #20

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Online
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 16381
  • Likes received: 6110
Ugh wrote:
Like I've said before I'm well-fed, well-housed and well off, so if the jews are responsible for that they deserve a medal..:)



The jewish Hand in the World Wars


November 9, 2020 Meža Vilks


The Jewish Hand in the World Wars, Part 1 & 2
By Thomas Dalton
Published: 2014-05-23




In 2006, an inebriated Mel Gibson allegedly said this: “The jews are responsible for all the wars in the world.” There followed the predicable storm of anti-anti-Semitism, ad hominem attacks, and various other slanders against Gibson’s character. But virtually no one asked the question: Is he right? Or rather this: To what degree could he be right?

Clearly jews can’t be responsible for all the world’s wars, but might they have had a hand in many wars—at least amongst those countries in which they lived or interacted? Given their undeniable influence in those nations where they exceed even a fraction of a percent of the population, jews must be responsible, to some degree, for at least some of what government does, both good and bad. Jews are often praised as brilliant managers, economists, and strategists, and have been granted seemingly endless awards and honors. But those given credit for their successes must also receive blame for their failures. And there are few greater failures in the lives of nations than war.

To begin to evaluate Gibson’s charge, I will look at the role jews played in the two major wars of world history, World Wars I and II. But first I need to recap some relevant history in order to better understand the context of jewish policy and actions during those calamitous events.


Historical Context


Have jews played a disproportionate role in war and social conflict—a role typically not of peacemakers and reconcilers, but of instigators and profiteers? Let us very briefly review some historical evidence to answer this charge; it provides relevant insight into Jewish influences during both world wars.

As far back as the Book of Genesis, we find stories such as that of Joseph, son of Jacob, sold into slavery in Egypt. Joseph earns the favor of the Pharaoh and is elevated to a position of power. When a famine strikes, Joseph develops and implements a brutal policy of exploitation, leading Egyptian farmers to sell their land, animals, and ultimately themselves in exchange for food. Joseph himself survives unscathed, living out his days in “the land of Goshen,” with a life of luxury and ease—evidently as repayment for a job well done.[1]

Over time, jews continued to build a reputation as rabble-rousers and exploiters. In 41 AD, Roman Emperor Claudius issued his Third Edict, condemning the jews of Alexandria for abuse of privilege and sowing discord; he charged them with “fomenting a general plague which infests the whole world.” Eight years later he expelled them from Rome. As a result, the jews revolted in Jerusalem in the years 66-70, and again in 115 and 132. Of that final uprising, Cassius Dio made the following observation—the first clear indication of jews causing a major war:


jews everywhere were showing signs of hostility to the Romans, partly by secret and partly overt acts… [M]any other nations, too, were joining them through eagerness for gain, and the whole earth, one might almost say, was being stirred up over the matter.[2]



Thus it was not without reason that notable Romans denounced the jews—among these Seneca (“an accursed race”), Quintilian (“a race which is a curse to others”), and Tacitus (a “disease,” a “pernicious superstition,” and “the basest of peoples”).[3] Prominent German historian Theodor Mommsen reaffirmed this view, noting that the jews of Rome were indeed agents of social disruption and decay: “Also in the ancient world, judaism was an effective ferment of cosmopolitanism and of national decomposition.”[4]

Throughout the Middle Ages and into the Renaissance, their negative reputation persisted. John Chrysostom, Thomas Aquinas, and Martin Luther all condemned jewish usury—a lending practice often trading on distress, and a frequent cause of social unrest. In the 1770s, Baron d’Holbach declared that “the jewish people distinguished themselves only by massacres, unjust wars, cruelties, usurpations, and infamies.” He added that they “lived continually in the midst of calamities, and were, more than all other nations, the sport of frightful revolutions.”[5] Voltaire was struck by the danger posed to humanity by the Hebrew tribe; “I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race.”[6] Kant called them a “nation of deceivers,” and Hegel remarked that “the only act Moses reserved for the Israelites was…to borrow with deceit and repay confidence with theft.”[7]

Thus both empirical evidence and learned opinion suggest that jews have, for centuries, had a hand in war, social strife, and economic distress, and have managed to profit thereby.[8] Being a small and formally disempowered minority everywhere, it is striking that they should merit even a mention in such events—or if they did, it should have been as the exploited, and not the exploiters. And yet they seem to have demonstrated a consistent ability to turn social unrest to their advantage. Thus it is not an unreasonable claim that they might even instigate such unrest, anticipating that they could achieve desired ends.



jewish Advance in America and Elsewhere


The long history of jewish involvement in social conflict has a direct bearing on both world wars. Consider their progressive influence in American government. Beginning in the mid-1800s, we find a number of important milestones. In 1845, the first jews were elected to both houses of Congress: Lewis Levin (Pa.) to the House and David Yulee (Fla.) to the Senate. By 1887 they had their first elected governor, Washington Bartlett in California. And in 1889, Solomon Hirsch became the first jewish minister, nominated by President Harrison as ambassador to the Ottoman Empire—which at that time controlled Palestine.

Overseas, trouble was brewing for the jews in Russia. A gang of anarchists, one or two of whom were jewish, succeeded in killing Czar Alexander II in 1881. This unleashed a multi-decade series of periodic pogroms, most minor but some killing multiple hundreds of jews. Further difficulties for them came with the so-called May Laws of 1882, which placed restrictions on jewish business practice and areas of residency within the “Pale of Settlement” in the western portion of the Russian empire.[9] Many jews fled the Pale; of those heading west, Germany was their first stop.[10]

Even prior to the 1880s, jewish influence in Germany was considerable. In the 1840s, both Bruno Bauer and Karl Marx wrote influential essays on Die Judenfrage (The Jewish Question). In 1850, composer Richard Wagner complained that Germans found themselves “in the position of fighting for emancipation from the jews. The jew is, in fact…more than emancipated. He rules…”[11] By 1878, Wagner declared that jewish control of German newspapers was nearly total. A year later Wilhelm Marr decried “the victory of jewry over Germandom”; he believed it self-evident that “without striking a blow…jewry today has become the socio-political dictator of Germany.”[12]

The facts support these views. And with the influx of “Russian” and “Polish” jews in the late 1800s and early 1900s, the situation got demonstrably worse. Sarah Gordon (1984: 10-14) cites the following impressive statistics:


Before the First World War, for example, jews occupied 13 percent of the directorships of joint-stock corporations and 24 percent of the supervisory positions within these corporations. … [D]uring 1904 they comprised 27 percent of all lawyers, 10 percent of all apprenticed lawyers, 5 percent of court clerks, 4 percent of magistrates, and up to 30 percent of all higher ranks of the judiciary. … jews were [also] over represented among university professors and students between 1870 and 1933. For example, in 1909-1910…almost 12 percent of instructors at German universities were jewish… n 1905-1906 jewish students comprised 25 percent of the law and medical students… The percentage of jewish doctors was also quite high, especially in large cities, where they sometimes were a majority. … n Berlin around 1890, 25 percent of all children attending grammar school were jewish…



For all this, jews never exceeded 2% of the German population. The public accepted the foreigners with a remarkable degree of tolerance, and more or less allowed them to dominate certain sectors of German society. There were no legal constraints, and violent attacks were rare. But the Germans would come to regret such liberal policies.

The other important factor at that time was the emergence of Zionism. Formally established by Theodor Herzl in 1897, its basic principles were laid out in his book Der Judenstaat (The Jewish State). He argued that the jews would never be free from persecution as long as they were foreigners everywhere, and thus they needed their own state. A number of locations were discussed, but by the time of the first meeting of the World Zionist Organization in 1897, the movement had settled on Palestine. This, however, was problematic because the region at that time was under control of the Ottoman Empire, and was populated primarily by Muslim and Christian Arabs. Somehow, the Zionist jews would have to wrest control of Palestine away from the Ottoman Turks and then drive out the Arabs. It was a seemingly impossible task.

They immediately understood that this could only be done by force. It would take a condition of global distress—something approaching a world war—in order for the Zionists to manipulate things to their advantage. Their guiding principle of ‘profit through distress’ could work here, but it would require both internal and external pressure. In states where the jews had significant population but little official power, they would foment unrest from within. In states where they had influence, they would use the power of their accumulated wealth to dictate national policy. And in states where they had neither population nor influence, they would apply external pressure to secure support for their purposes.

That the Zionists seriously contemplated this two-pronged, internal/external strategy is no mere speculation; we have the word of Herzl himself. He wrote:


When we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers of the revolutionary party; when we rise, there rises also our terrible power of the purse. (1896/1967: 26)



In fact, Herzl apparently predicted the outbreak of global war. One of the original Zionists, Litman Rosenthal, wrote in his diary of 15 December 1914 his recollection of a conversation with Herzl from 1897. Herzl allegedly said,


It may be that Turkey will refuse or be unable to understand us. This will not discourage us. We will seek other means to accomplish our end. The Orient question is now the question of the day. Sooner or later it will bring about a conflict among the nations. A European war is imminent… The great European war must come. With my watch in hand do I await this terrible moment. After the great European war is ended the Peace Conference will assemble. We must be ready for that time. We will assuredly be called to this great conference of the nations and we must prove to them the urgent importance of a Zionist solution to the Jewish Question.



This was Herzl’s so-called “great war prophecy.” Now, he does not say that the Zionists will cause this war, only that they will “be ready” when it comes, and “will seek other means” than diplomacy to accomplish their end. A striking prediction, if true.[13]

In any case, there was clearly a larger plan at work here. The jews would pursue a policy of revolution in states like Russia in order to bring down hated governments. To the degree possible, they would seek to undermine the Ottoman Turks as well. And in Germany, the UK, and America, they would use “the terrible power of the purse” to dictate an aggressive war-policy in order to realign the global power structure to their favor. This would have a triple benefit: curtailing rampant anti-Semitism; enhancing jewish wealth; and ultimately establishing a jewish state in Palestine, one that could serve as the global center of world jewry. Revolution and war thus became a top priority.[14]

Turkey was in fact an early success for the movement. The Sultan’s system of autocratic rule generated some dissatisfaction, and a group of “Turkish” jews exploited this to their advantage—resulting in the Turkish Revolution of 1908. As Stein explains,


the revolution had been organized from Salonica [present-day Thessaloniki], where the jews, together with the crypto-jews known as Dönmeh, formed a majority of the population. Salonica jews and the Dönmeh had taken an important part in the events associated with the revolution and had provided the Committee of Union and Progress with several of its ablest members. (1961: 35)[15]



This group of revolutionaries, today known as the Young Turks, was able to overthrow the Sultan and exert substantial influence on the succeeding ruler. But in the end they were unable to steer the declining empire in a pro-Zionist direction.

Back in the USA, jewish population was rising even faster than in Germany. In 1880 it had roughly 250,000 jews (0.5%), but by 1900—just 20 years later—the figure was around 1.5 million (1.9%). A census of 1918 showed this number increasing to an astonishing figure of 3 million (2.9%). Their political influence grew commensurately.

For present purposes, significant American influence began with the assassination of President William McKinley in 1901. He was shot by a Polish radical named Leon Czolgosz, who had been heavily influenced by two jewish anarchists, Emma Goldman and Alexander Berkman. The presidency immediately fell to the vice president, Theodore Roosevelt—who, at age 42, was (and remains) the youngest president in history. His role as an army colonel in the 1898 victory in Cuba over the Spaniards had led to widespread publicity, and with the backing of the jewish community, he won the New York governorship later that same year. Thus he was well situated to earn the vice presidential nomination in 1900.

A question of interest: Was Roosevelt jewish? I will examine this issue in detail later with respect to FDR (as to whom there is more to say), but in brief, there is considerable circumstantial evidence that all of the Roosevelts were, at least in part, jewish. In Theodore’s case, the only explicit indication is a claim by former Michigan governor Chase Osborn. In a letter dated 21 March 1935, Osborn said, “President [Franklin] Roosevelt knows well enough that his ancestors were jewish. I heard Theodore Roosevelt state twice that his ancestors were jewish.”[16] But Osborn offers no specifics, and I am not aware of any further claims regarding Theodore himself.

However, there are two other relevant items regarding his jewish connections. Having acceded to the office in 1901, he subsequently won the 1904 election. In late 1906 he appointed the first jew to the presidential cabinet: Oscar Straus, a wealthy New York lawyer and former ambassador to the Ottoman Empire. As Secretary of Labor and Commerce, Straus was in charge of the Bureau of Immigration—at the critical time of accelerating jewish immigration. We can be sure that his office was particularly amenable to incoming jews.

The second event occurred in 1912. Roosevelt had declined to run again in 1908, preferring to nominate his Secretary of War, William Taft—who proceeded to win handily. Taft, however, disappointed many Republicans, and there was a call to bring Roosevelt back. But the party would not oust a sitting president, and so Roosevelt decided to run on a third-party ticket. Hence the peculiar status of the 1912 election: it featured Taft running for reelection, Roosevelt running as a third-party candidate, and Woodrow Wilson running as a first-term Democrat. As the history books like to say, we had a former president and a sitting president running against a future president. Wilson, as we know, would win this race, and go on to serve two consecutive terms—covering the lead-up, duration, and aftermath of World War I.


jewish banker Paul Warburg (1868-1932) at the 1st Pan-American Financial Conference, Washington D.C., May, 1915.
By Harris & Ewing [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons



But less well known is this fact: For perhaps the first time in US history, all three major candidates had substantial jewish financial backing. Henry Ford’s Dearborn Independent reported on a 1914 Congressional testimony by Paul Warburg, best known as the jewish “father of the Federal Reserve.” Warburg was the prototypical jewish banker, long-time partner at Kuhn, Loeb, and Co., and later head of Wells Fargo in New York. At some point during Taft’s presidency, Warburg decided to get financially involved in politics. By the time of the 1912 election, he and his partners at Kuhn, Loeb were funding all three candidates. Warburg’s testimony, before Senator Joseph Bristow (R-Kan.), is revealing:


JB: “It has been variously reported in the newspapers that you and your partners directly and indirectly contributed very largely to Mr. Wilson’s campaign funds.” PW: “Well, my partners—there is a very peculiar condition—no; I do not think any one of them contributed largely at all; there may have been moderate contributions. My brother, for instance, contributed to Mr. Taft’s campaign.” …

JB: “I understood you to say that you contributed to Mr. Wilson’s campaign.” PW: “No; my letter says that I offered to contribute; but it was too late. I came back to this country only a few days before the campaign closed.” JB: “So that you did not make any contribution?” PW: “I did not make any contribution; no.” JB: “Did any members of your firm make contributions to Mr. Wilson’s campaign?” PW: “I think that is a matter of record. Mr. [Jacob] Schiff contributed. I would not otherwise discuss the contributions of my partners, if it was not a matter of record. I think Mr. Schiff was the only one who contributed in our firm.” JB: “And you stated that your brother had contributed to Mr. Taft’s campaign, as I understand it?” PW: “I did. But again, I do not want to go into a discussion of my partners’ affairs, and I shall stick to that pretty strictly, or we will never get through.” JB: “I understood you also to say that no members of your firm contributed to Mr. Roosevelt’s campaign.” PW: “I did not say that.” JB: “Oh! Did any members of the firm do that?” PW: “My answer would please you probably; but I shall not answer that, but will repeat that I will not discuss my partners’ affairs.” JB: “Yes. I understood you to say Saturday that you were a Republican, but when Mr. Roosevelt became a candidate, you then became a sympathizer with Mr. Wilson and supported him?” PW: “Yes.” JB: “While your brother was supporting Mr. Taft?” PW: “Yes.” JB: “And I was interested to know whether any member of your firm supported Mr. Roosevelt.” PW: “It is a matter of record that there are.” JB: “That there are some of them who did?” PW: “Oh, yes.”[17]



In sum: some unknown members of Kuhn, Loeb donated to Roosevelt; Paul’s brother (Felix) gave to Taft; and Schiff donated to Wilson. Cleverly, Paul Warburg himself admitted to no funding, but we can hardly take him at his word here. In any case, there was a jewish hand in all three contestants, and the jews were guaranteed influence with the winner, no matter the outcome. We don’t know the extent of this influence, nor how long it had gone on. To date I have not uncovered evidence of jewish involvement with Roosevelt’s 1904 election, although his appointment of Straus to the cabinet is typical of the kind of political patronage that follows financial support. And the same with Taft: We don’t know the degree of jewish support for his initial run in 1908, but support in 1912 suggests that they were reasonably satisfied with his performance.

But Taft turned out to be a mixed bag for the jews. On the one hand, jewish immigration continued apace. And he did appoint Oscar Straus to the ambassadorship to the Ottoman Empire . However, he was less inclined to act on the international stage than the jews had wished. Of particular concern was the growing problem in Russia, and steady reports of jewish pogroms. For example, there was the “Kishinev massacre” of April 1903; the New York Times reported that “jews were slaughtered like sheep. The dead number 120… The scenes of horror attending this massacre are beyond description. Babes were literally torn to pieces by the frenzied and blood-thirsty mob” (April 28; p. 6). A slight exaggeration—the actual death toll was 47. A second attack in Kishinev in 1905 left 19 dead; regrettable, but hardly a catastrophe. In early 1910 the NYT ran an article, “Russian Jews in Sad Plight.” Their source said, “The condition of Russian [jews] is worse today than at any time since the barbarous massacres and pogroms of 1905 and 1906.”[18] Then on 18 September 1911, the Russian Prime Minister, Pyotr Stolypin, was shot and killed—by a jewish assassin, Mordekhai Gershkovich, aka Dmitri Bogrov. (The reader will recall Herzl’s demand for revolutionary action.) This of course brought even harsher recriminations.

But the last straw, for the American Zionists, was the restriction on “American” jews from entering into Russia. There had been obstacles in place since the turn of the century, but they became much more stringent during Taft’s presidency. The Zionists wanted the US government to take action, but this was forestalled by a long-standing treaty of 1832, one that guaranteed “reciprocal liberty of commerce and navigation” and allowed mutual freedom of entry of citizens on both sides. The Zionists thus took it upon themselves to initiate the abrogation of this treaty as a means of putting external pressure on the Czarist regime. And, despite the wishes of President Taft and the best interests of America at large, they succeeded. This whole incident, thoroughly documented by Cohen (1963), is an astounding and watershed event in jewish influence. As she says,


Credit for this act belongs to a small group which had campaigned publicly during 1911 for the abrogation of the treaty. How a mere handful of men succeeded in arousing American public opinion on a relatively obscure issue to a near “wave of hysteria,” how they forced the hand of an antagonistic administration, and what principal aim lay behind their fight for abrogation constitute an absorbing story of pressure politics. (p. 3)


The “mere handful of men” consisted primarily of jewish lawyer Louis Marshall, the banker Jacob Schiff, and their colleagues at the American Jewish Committee—the ‘AIPAC’ of its day, and still a potent force a century later. They had raised the topic of abrogation as early as 1908, but it did not become a top priority until early 1910. They then approached Taft, knowing that he was preparing to run for reelection the following year. As Cohen (p. 9) says, “The quid pro quo was obvious; the jewish leaders would try to deliver the jewish vote to Taft.” But he was unsympathetic. Taft knew that, for several reasons, it was not in America’s favor: Our commercial interests, our Far East foreign policy, Russian good will, and our international integrity would all be harmed by abrogation. But the jews were pressing; in February 1910 they met with Taft, to “give him one last chance” to support their cause. When he again declined, they decided to go around the president, to Congress and to the American people. They knew how to work Congress. As Cohen (p. 13) explains, “the pattern of jewish petitions to the government…was generally that of secret diplomacy. Wealthy or politically prominent individuals asked favors…but always in the form of discreet pressure and behind-the-scenes bargaining.” But mounting a public campaign was something new.

In January 1911, Marshall “officially opened the public campaign for abrogation.” He immediately appealed not to jewish interest—though that was the sole motive—but rather to allegedly American interests. “It is not the jew who is insulted; it is the American people,” he said. As Shogan (2010: 22) puts it, “a key to the [jewish] strategy was to frame its demand as a plea to protect American interests in general, not just the rights of jews.” The AJC then embarked on a massive propaganda effort. They enlisted jewish support in the media; Samuel Strauss and Adolph Ochs (of the New York Times) helped coordinate a series of articles and op-eds in several major cities. They made the case “in popular emotional terms,” organized petitions and letter-writing programs, and held dedicated, pro-abrogation rallies—one of which included such luminaries as William Hearst and future president Woodrow Wilson.[19] Everything was designed to put maximum pressure on Congress to act.

All the while, Taft remained firm in his opposition. In a private letter he wrote, “I am the President of the whole United States, and the vote of the jews, important as it is, cannot frighten me in this matter” (Cohen, p. 21). Secretary of State Philander Knox, and Ambassador to Russia William Rockhill, both strongly supported him. Rockhill was particularly galled; expressing his thoughts, Cohen asks, “were national interests to be subservient to a small group of individuals?” After all, the actual harm was near microscopic: “Only 28 American jews resided in Russia, and the State Dept knew of only four cases in five years where American jews were denied admission” (p. 16). And yet this “small group of men” was turning the tide in their favor.

By November of 1911, just 11 months after launching their public campaign, the AJC was confident of victory. Schiff was able to predict easy passage for the resolution. That same month an “unofficial delegation” of jews met with Taft regarding his pending annual message, and they convinced him that Congressional action was inevitable, and veto-proof. Taft relented, agreeing to sign the resolution when it reached his desk. Wanting no further delay, the AJC pressed for a vote before the end of year. On December 13 the House approved the measure—by the astounding tally of 301 to 1. A slightly modified version came up for Senate vote on December 19, which was passed unanimously. A reconciled bill was approved the next day, and Taft signed it. So it came to be that, on 20 December 1911, the US government sold its soul to the Jewish Lobby.

The importance of this event can scarcely be overestimated. The interests of “a mere handful of men,” acting on behalf of a small American minority, were able to dictate governmental foreign policy, against the express wishes of the president and his staff, and contrary to the larger interests of the nation.

The Russians, incidentally, were stunned at this decision. They knew of the jewish hand behind it, but could hardly believe that it had the power to carry through on its threat. The NYT again gives a useful report:


In parliamentary circles here [in Russia] the prevailing comment is characterized by astonishment that the American government has responded so readily to the jewish outcry. The opinion is expressed by members of the Duma that in all probability the jews will now attempt to force matters further. (20 Dec 1911; p. 2)



Indeed—the jewish-led Bolshevik revolution was just six years away.

Such was the state of things in America and globally at that time. International jewry had sufficient wealth and influence to steer events at the highest levels, and “American” jews (Zionist and otherwise) had come to permeate the government—and American culture generally. The situation so impressed German economist Werner Sombart that in 1911 he made this observation: “For what we call Americanism is nothing else than the jewish spirit distilled.”[20] From the perspective of a century later, this would seem truer than ever.


Wilson and the “Great War”



All this, then, serves as the context and backdrop for the emergence of Woodrow Wilson, beginning with the election of 1912. If Franklin Roosevelt was “the first great hero of American jews,”[21] then Wilson was the first great understudy. As Henry Ford saw it, “Mr. Wilson, while President, was very close to the jews. His administration, as everyone knows, was predominantly jewish.”[22] Wilson seems to have been the first president to have the full backing of the Jewish Lobby, including multiple major financial donors. And he was the first to fully reward their support.

It’s worthwhile summarizing the main figures in the jewish power structure, as of 1912. Herzl died young in 1904, so he was out of the picture. But a “mere handful” of others came to dominate the movement, and the American scene:

- Oscar Straus (age 62), German-born, first jewish cabinet member under T. Roosevelt, and later ambassador to the Ottoman Empire under Taft.
- Jacob Schiff (65), head of the Kuhn, Loeb banking firm.
- Louis Marshall (56), borderline Zionist, founder of the AJC.
- The Warburg brothers: Paul (44) and Felix (41), German-born bankers. A third brother, Max, stayed in Germany (until 1938).
- Henry Morgenthau, Sr. (56), German-born lawyer, father of the even more influential Henry, Jr.
- Louis Brandeis (56), lawyer, strongly Zionist.
- Samuel Untermyer (54), lawyer.
- Bernard Baruch (42), Wall Street financier.
- Stephen Wise (40), Austrian-born rabbi and fervent Zionist.
- Richard Gottheil (50), British-born rabbi and Zionist.

These, to emphasize, were all “Americans.” On the European side there was a different structure, one centered on such figures as Chaim Weizmann and Herbert Samuel in Britain, and Max Nordau in France.

Let me begin with financial backing—which of course has long been the trump card of jewry. Many of the above individuals were prime supporters of Wilson. Cooper (2009: 172) remarks that his “big contributors” included the likes of “Henry Morgenthau, Jacob Schiff, and Samuel Untermyer, as well as a newcomer to their ranks, Bernard Baruch.” Such assistance continued throughout Wilson’s tenure; for his 1916 reelection bid, “financiers such as Henry Morgenthau and Bernard Baruch gave generously” (ibid: 350). As we saw, Schiff’s support was admitted by Warburg in his congressional testimony.

Warburg himself was very evasive, allowing only that his “sympathies went with Mr. Wilson.” Yet we can hardly believe that no money followed. Warburg’s most profound impact was his leading role in the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913, the year Wilson took office. Seligman (1914: 387) remarks that “it may be stated without fear of contradiction that in its fundamental features the Federal Reserve is the work of Mr. Warburg more than of any other man in the country.” Its basic principles, he said, “were the creation of Mr. Warburg and of Mr. Warburg alone.” In due recognition, Wilson appointed him to the Fed’s first Board of Governors in August 1914.

Morgenthau’s influence began in 1911, when Wilson was still governor of New Jersey. Balakian (2003: 220) notes that it was at this time that the two “bonded,” and that “Morgenthau offered Wilson his ‘unreserved moral and financial support’.” In the run-up to the 1912 Democratic convention, “Morgenthau was giving $5,000 a month to the campaign, and continued to give generously throughout the fall” (ibid.: 221). In fact, says Balakian, only a few of his wealthy Princeton classmates gave more. Ward (1989: 252) confirms this, noting that Morgenthau “had been an important backer of Woodrow Wilson in 1912.” Morgenthau duly received his reward: ambassadorship to Ottoman Turkey, again overseeing Palestine.

Of special importance was Wilson’s association with Louis Brandeis. The two first met back in 1910; Shogan (2010: 64) describes Brandeis’s “friendship with Woodrow Wilson,” noting that he had “worked mightily” for him in the 1912 campaign. In a telling statement, Wilson wrote to his friend after the election, “You were yourself a great part of the victory.”[23] Brandeis would be rewarded by a successful nomination to the Supreme Court in June 1916—the first jew on the court. He would serve a full 23 years, well beyond Wilson’s lifetime, and, despite his formal ‘neutrality’ as a justice, would play a vital role in both world wars.

But perhaps the most significant of all was Bernard Baruch. A millionaire before he was 30, Baruch catapulted out of nowhere, under obscure conditions, to become a leading influence in the Wilson administration. Already in 1915, in the early years of the European war, he was convinced that America would be involved. In Congressional testimony of February 1920, Baruch stated that, in 1915, he “had been very much disturbed by the unprepared condition of this country.” “I had been thinking about it very seriously, and I thought we would be drawn into the war. … I thought a war was coming long before it did.” Through some still-mysterious process, Baruch was named to the Council of National Defense in early 1916. He then came to control a particular subcommittee, the War Industries Board (WIB), which had extraordinary wartime powers. Baruch single-handedly ran it throughout the war years. His testimony before Sen. Albert Jefferis (R-Neb.) summarizes his role:


AJ: “In what lines did this board of 10 have the powers that you mention? BB: “We had the power of priority, which was the greatest power in the war.” AJ: “In other words, you determined what everybody could have?” BB: “Exactly; there is no question about that. I assumed that responsibility, sir, and that final determination rested within me.” AJ: “What?” BB: “That final determination, as the President said, rested within me; the determination of whether the Army or Navy should have it rested with me; the determination of whether the Railroad Administration could have it, or the Allies, or whether General Allenby should have locomotives, or whether they should be used in Russia, or used in France.” AJ: “You had considerable power?” BB: “Indeed I did, sir.” …

AJ: “And all those different lines, really, ultimately, centered in you, so far as power was concerned?” BB: “Yes, sir, it did. I probably had more power than perhaps any other man did in the war; doubtless that is true.”[24]


An astonishing fact: a young, unelected jew with no political experience becomes, in time of crisis, the most powerful man in the US government, after the president himself. And yet all this was just a rehearsal. Baruch would play a similar role in the Second World War under FDR, in his Office of War Mobilization. He was also a friend and confidant of Winston Churchill. No doubt “Barney” Baruch had lots of advice for all parties involved.

World War I began in earnest in August of 1914, when the German army crossed into officially neutral Belgium on its way to France. A series of alliances and treaties triggered a chain reaction in which 10 nations entered the war by the end of that year. Ultimately another 18 would be engaged—though in the case of the US, it would be nearly two and half years later. It’s difficult today, with our present eagerness to engage in warfare around the world, to understand the degree to which Americans then were so strongly anti-interventionist. Neither the public nor the government had any real inclination to get involved in a European war. Publicly, at least, Wilson himself was a pacifist and an isolationist. In a speech of 19 August 1914, just after the outbreak of war, he proclaimed that “every man who really loves America will act and speak in the true spirit of neutrality, which is the spirit of impartiality and fairness and friendliness to all concerned.” We have a duty to be “the one great nation at peace,” and thus “we must be impartial in thought as well as in action.”[25]

And yet, American governmental policy did not fully adhere to these lofty words. Under international law, the United States, as a neutral party, had the right to conduct commerce with all sides. But of course both Britain and Germany sought to restrict trade with the other. A British naval blockade interrupted or seized a substantial portion of our intended shipments to Germany, reducing trade by more than 90%. And yet Wilson hardly objected. On the other hand, when German submarines attacked or threatened our shipments to England, he reacted in the strongest manner. The end result was a near quadrupling of trade with the Allies between 1914 and 1916. In practical terms, we were supporting the Allied war effort, even as we remained officially neutral. Wilson’s government—if not he himself—was decidedly biased against the Germans. Not coincidentally, Wilson’s jewish advisors were, to a man, anti-German.

By the time of the 1916 election, war was churning throughout Europe. Still, Wilson promised to remain unengaged; he ran and won on the slogan, “He kept us out of war.” The American people too had little appetite for armed conflict; as Cooper (2009: 381) writes, “Clearly, the president was not feeling a push for war from Congress or the public.” But like so many campaign promises, this one would be discarded soon afterward—in fact, barely one month after his second inauguration.

So: Why did he do it? Why did Wilson change his mind and, on 2 April 1917, issue his famous call to Congress to declare war on Germany? His official answer: German submarines were relentlessly targeting US military, passenger, and cargo ships, and thus we simply had no choice. But this explanation does not withstand scrutiny. Early in the war the Germans were sinking a number of ships that were trafficking with the Allies, but in September 1915, after urgent demands from Wilson, they suspended submarine attacks. This suspension held for an exceptionally long time—through February 1917. And all throughout that time, we, and other “neutral” nations, were trading with Germany’s enemies, supplying them with material goods, and assisting in a naval blockade. Thus it is unsurprising that the Germans eventually resumed their attacks, on all ships in the war zone.

In his famous speech to Congress, Wilson said of the lifting of the suspension, “the Imperial German Government…put aside all restraints of law or of humanity, and uses its submarines to sink every vessel [in the war zone].” Sparing no hyperbole, he added, “The present German submarine warfare against commerce is a warfare against mankind. It is a war against all nations.”

But what are the facts? Specifically, how big a threat did Germany pose to the US? In reality, it was not much of a threat at all. From the time of the outbreak of war (August 1914) until Wilson’s declaration in April 1917, a total of three small military ships were lost—one submarine in 1915, one armored cruiser in 1916, and one protected cruiser in early 1917. Additionally, a total of 12 American merchant steamers (freight ships) were sunk in the same period, but with the loss of only 38 individual lives.[26] So the US had lost a grand total of 15 ships to that point. Putting this in perspective: Over the course of the entire war, German U-boats sank roughly 6,600 ships in total. Hence the threat to the US was all but inconsequential. Clearly Wilson was thinking in internationalist terms, and someone or something convinced him that realigning the global order was more important than American public opinion; thus his famous and much-derided phrase: “The world must be made safe for democracy.” Yes—but whose democracy?

A few powerful voices opposed Wilson, including Senators Robert La Follette (R-Wisc.) and George Norris (R-Neb.). Both spoke on April 4, just two days after Wilson’s plea for war. La Follette was outraged at the unilateral action taken by the Wilson administration. In a scathing speech, he said:


I am speaking of a profession of democracy that is linked in action with the most brutal and domineering use of autocratic power. Are the people of this country being so well-represented in this war movement that we need to go abroad to give other people control of their governments? Will the President and the supporters of this war bill submit it to a vote of the people before the declaration of war goes into effect? … Who has registered the knowledge or approval of the American people of the course this Congress is called upon to take in declaring war upon Germany? Submit the question to the people, you who support it. You who support it dare not do it, for you know that by a vote of more than ten to one the American people as a body would register their declaration against it.[27]


Read more
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2
Moderators: novum, rodin, Flare
Powered by Kunena Forum

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it. Secure transactions via paypal.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2020 - May 2021, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 255 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 70 - Raised
( £ 53 GBP )
donation thermometer
21%
Most Recent Donation $50 USD
28th August 2020

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.