Your donations are appreciated and help keep this site running. Even the smallest amount helps.
Thankyou

 
PROMOTE YOUR SITE
HERE
Only $3 USD/month
TRUTHSPOON.COM
The man they can't recruit!
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
Threads and posts subject to the discretion of the moderators in this category.

Moderators: PFIZIPFEI

TOPIC: Johannes Lang - The Hollow World Theory - Die Hohlwelttheorie 1938 - ENGLISH Translation

Johannes Lang - The Hollow World Theory - Die Hohlwelttheorie 1938 - ENGLISH Translation 15 Nov 2015 21:46 #1

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 30 May 2017 08:19 by PFIZIPFEI.
The topic has been locked.

Johannes Lang - The Hollow World Theory - Die Hohlwelttheorie 1938 - ENGLISH Translation 30 Jan 2016 19:30 #2

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960
rodin wrote:
Where is your promised translation of Johannes Lang's work?
Source: truth-zone.net/forum/science-and-physics/63418-hollow-world-theory-inner-world-cosmos-skycentrism-we-live-in-the-concave-earth.html?start=1460#193628




"We'll cross that bridge when we get to it."

... as the folk saying goes.

From what you reveal in your comments on that thread,
you are not even able to detect the bridge on a map yet,
let alone realise that you have already been standing on it
while you are plunging into the water


◄ Matthew 7:6 ►

.
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 30 Jan 2016 19:52 by PFIZIPFEI.
The topic has been locked.

Johannes Lang - The Hollow World Theory - Die Hohlwelttheorie 1938 - ENGLISH Translation 31 Jan 2016 21:48 #3

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960
expand
"In whatever way or manner may have occurred this business,
I must still say that I curse this modern history theory of Cosmology,
and hope that perchance there may appear, in due time, some young
scientists of genius, who will pick up courage enough to upset this
universally disseminated delirium of lunatics."


- The Complete Works of Goethe in 40 Volumes, 1859


"The Tower of Babylon casts its spell,
They cannot be united!
Now each man has his inner hell,
Copernicus included."


- Goethe, Proverbs


"The world's the ball: ... A hollow thing,—"

- Goethe, Faust


expand

Preface To The Second Edition:


Not a single newspaper or magazine has published a review of the first edition
of this present book. Nowhere was it even mentioned. The Totschweigetaktik
of the science community in relation to my work seemed to prove successful
in the best way possible. How could a second edition be necessary so soon
under those circumstances? How could the readers learn at all, that a book
"Die Hohlwelttheorie" exists? The success of the first edition was possible in
spite of the "Totschweigetaktik", because almost every buyer of the book sup-
ported it, recommended it. I hereby would like to extend my sincere thanks to
each of the readers for that. Only if more and more people join me in calling for
verification of the experiments and measurements by the science community
that lead to the Hohlwelttheorie, rather than hushing them up, truth will prevail.

Nobody has so far been able to refute the Hohlwelttheorie in any point or rebut
my arguments against the Copernican World System. Anyone who reads the
present work, will be surprised at the rich factual material which I adduced for
the Hohlwelttheorie and against Copernicanism. Even more surprised will he be,
however, that the scientists have to conceal these facts, if they do not want to
give up the Copernican system.

The greatest significance of this present work in relation to progress and knowl-
edge, in my assessment, is the fact that a conception of the world is shown here,
which can explain all phenomena in the cosmos consistently. Thus its previous
monopoly position will be taken away from the Copernican worldview.

It is falsely claimed that the Copernican system needs no proof, because it is the
only worldview that consistently allows to explain all phenomena.



Now I will prove that a) the Copernican system cannot explain quite a number of
phenomena at all, b) experiments and measurements testify against it, c) whereas
the Hohlwelttheorie really explains all phenomena consistently and moreover also
can be proven experimentally.

Any discussion must therefore lead to victory of the Hohlwelttheorie, because seri-
ous scholars could indeed refuse in no way to comply with my request to answer the
question by jointly performing the experiment. Where you can measure, you precise-
ly do not need to argue. Therefore relinquishment of the Totschweigetaktik means
recognition of the Hohlwelttheorie.The Copernicans must refuse to measure.
Will they once measure, then the Hohlwelttheorie has triumphed!


Johannes Lang.



.
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 30 May 2017 07:48 by PFIZIPFEI.
The topic has been locked.

Johannes Lang - The Hollow World Theory - Die Hohlwelttheorie 1938 - ENGLISH Translation 02 Feb 2016 21:43 #4

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960
expand


Index:


Is the Copernican system proven? 11

Analogous construction of the cosmos and the somatic cell of life 13

Proof by measurement: The straight line 25

Proof by measurement: The diverging plummets 29

The sail experiment 31

Infrared photographs 34

The mirage 38

The radio phenomena 42

The illuminated dark side of the moon 49

The Copernican theory of the "earth magnet" and the facts 51

The "general mechanical force theory" 59

The magnetic forces 66

Geomagnetism 71

The East-West power flow of the earth 76

The pendulum phenomenon 77

The purported "inertia" of water and air 81

Is rotation of the earth possible? 82

The problem of the gyro 84

The explanation of gravity 90

The explanation of the centrifugal force 104

The explanation of electricity 109

Is the "world eather" carrier of light and heat? 121

Sound as a "force" 134

The various forces as manifestations of the primal force 138

The distance measurements of the astronomers 143

The firmament as optical Illusion 145

The Copernican explanation of the origin of the horizon 150

A general outline of perspective 161

The unreliability of the geodetic measurements 165

The emergence of the horizon in the concave earth 170

What are fixed stars? 174

The nebula 182

The universe - an "exploding grenade" 189

"Cosmic rays" as evidence of the existence of a celestial sphere 195

What are the sun, moon, planets and comets? 196

The sunspot phenomenon 199

The "solar radiation" in the concave earth 200

The planets 202

The planetoids and planetary moons 204

The comets 204




Meteors and shooting stars 213

Rising and setting of heavenly bodies 218

The origin of day and night 218

The emergence of various day and night lengths 219

The Copernican explanation of the origin of the seasons 221

The formation of the seasons 226

The "tracks" of the heavenly bodies and the "Kepler laws" 229

The star movement in the concave earth 242

The eclipses of Jupiter's moons 247

Moon phases, lunar eclipse and solar eclipse 249

Parallax, aberration and Doppler's principle 251

Precession and nutation 253

Volcanoes and earthquakes 254

Tides 259

The zodiacal light 264

The "earthshine" 265

Northern lights 267

What's outside? 269

The huge size of the cubic capacity of the Hohlwelt 272

Hohlwelt theory and religion 274

Man and his worldview 279



.
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 02 Feb 2016 23:08 by PFIZIPFEI.
The topic has been locked.

Johannes Lang - The Hollow World Theory - Die Hohlwelttheorie 1938 - ENGLISH Translation 11 May 2016 14:28 #5

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960
expand



Table of Figures:


Cover: Presentation of the hollow world

Picture supplement no. 1: Infrared Photography of London 17

Picture supplement no. 2: Infrared Photography over 533 kilometers distance 175

Illustration no. 1: Illustration of the living cell 15

Illustration no. 2: Illustration of the human egg 16

Illustration no. 3: Picture of the magnetic lines of force 23

Illustration no. 4: Image of the lines of force of a radio transmitter 24

Illustration no. 5: The straight line on the convex and in the concave earth 25

Illustration no. 6: The plumbs on the convex earth 28

Illustration no. 7: The plumbs in the concave earth 28

Illustration no. 8: The sail experiment 32

Illustration no. 9: Schematic representation of the view of 533 km distance 36

Illustration no. 10/11: Graphical representation of the radio phenomena 44

Illustration no. 12: Location of dip needles on the convex earth 52

Illustration no. 13: Position of dip needles at the equator and situated nearby 52

Illustration no. 14: Location of dip needles in the concave earth 53

Illustration no. 15: Angle of dip needles in the concave and on the convex earth 53

Illustration no. 16/17: Graphical representation of the Copernican theory of the earth's magnetism 56

Illustration no. 18: Graphical representation of the magnetic effect 70

Illustration no. 19: The force of gravity effect in the hollow world 100

Illustration no. 20: The power transmission 105

Illustration no. 21: The centrifugal force 107

Illustration no. 22: Experimental evidence of the light bending (Plotnikov effect) 132

Illustration no. 23: The curvature of the light beam 146

Illustration no. 24: The firmament as an optical illusion 147

Illustration no. 25: The incidence angle of the light beams 151

Illustration no. 26: The apparent curvature of the cloud cover 156

Picture no. 27: The horizon at eye level 157

Illustration no. 28: The horizon as the edge of a bowl 158

Illustration no. 29: The perspective reduction 158

Illustration no. 30: The earth's surface as a wall for the eye 159

Illustration no. 31: The bulge of the Earth's surface 160

Illustration no. 32: Raising the horizon at eye level 163

Illustration no. 33: Geodetic height measurements 165

Illustration no. 34: The horizon in the concave earth 172

Illustration no. 35: Course of the light beam in optically varying dense layers 174

Picture no. 36/37. "Nebulae" in Sagittarius and Swan 183

Picture no. 38: Orion Nebula 183

Picture no. 39: Nebulae and star cave in the Milky Way 184

Picture no. 40/41: Planetary nebulae 185

Picture no. 42: Unusual comet forms 205

Illustration no. 43. Cometary orbits 206

Illustration no. 44/46: Graphical representation of the origin of the seasons 226

Illustration no. 47: Part of Mars orbit from "Astronomical Geography" 235

Illustration no. 48: Graphical representation of the phases of the moon and the lunar eclipse 249

Illustration no. 49: The moon phases seen from the earth's surface 250

Illustration no. 50: Copernican presentation of the attraction of the earth and the moon 260



Addendum: Please let me know on this discussion thread CLICK if there are any major translation mistakes. Thanks for your help!
.
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 11 May 2016 14:37 by PFIZIPFEI.
The topic has been locked.

Johannes Lang - The Hollow World Theory - Die Hohlwelttheorie 1938 - ENGLISH Translation 18 Aug 2016 12:20 #6

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960




Is The Copernican System Proven?

The today generally considered proven Copernican conception
of the world is completely unproven in reality in all of its parts.
There is not a single piece of evidence to prove this claim.
What is believed by the people to be evidence, e. g. the gradual
disappearance of a ship "below" the horizon, the Foucaultian
pendulum experiment, etc., these are not "evidence" in the
scientific sense. One can explain these phenomena quite natu-
rally even without the adoption of the Copernican system. But in
a case of explanation against explanation, the accuracy of one of
the two statements just has to be proven. An "explanation" is
by no means a proof. Because it first requires proof for its own
correctness after all.

Therefore, quite right, Dr. Fr. Beck (Kulmbach) writes about this
problem in an article headlined "Copernicus - An Open Question?":


"A) The world famous geophysicist Siegmund Günther, admits in his
History of Science that only the calculation of parallaxes of the fixed
stars could prove the Copernican system conclusively.1)

B) The radio wave research (stratosphere reflective coating), the
stratosphere research (sun area e. g. appearing blacker than the
"black sky"), the eclipse radiation deflection results and the light
and beam deflection puzzle of the stratosphere indicate that the
rectilinearity of "space rays" is not proven and can not be proven.

Thus, according to the famous University Professor Günther
himself
, the Copernican System is not perfectly proven at present,
since the precondition of parallax measurement, the rectilinearity of
parallax rays, is not yet proven.

_____________________________________________________
1) See: Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften (History of Science), Recl, Vol. II, No. 122.


11




C) The famous Nobel Prize winner (1932) Heisenberg teaches
that the sent in experimental radiation in the minutest atom system
- to the need to establish laws of disturbance - refract, interfere
and distort. Only if we were able to determine falsification laws of
the fixed stars' angle rays, Copernicanism would be more provable
than it is now, according to the authority University Professor Günther."

As can be seen from the above-cited presentations by Dr. Fr. Beck,
a scientist who obviously is thoroughly familiar with the latest research
results, the first Copernican authority Prof. Günther disallows all so-
called "evidence" for the Copernican system except the calculation of
parallaxes. Now Dr. Fr. Beck provides compelling evidence to him, that
he himself thereby accepts the Copernican system as unproven, be-
cause the parallax measurement is based on an unproven assumption.
Moreover - as we shall see later - the parallax measurements can also
be explained otherwise. Here again we have a case of explanation
against explanation, theory against theory. But one can not refute
one theory with another. As long as not one of them can be proven,
both have the same right to exist, although the simpler explanation is
always to be preferred.

Thus it is taught in the institutions of higher education in Switzerland
that the Copernican system is indeed unproven, but no proof needed,
because it was the only worldview that could explain all phenomena in
the universe comfortably and consistently. This position may once
have been justified. Now it has become untenable, since there is still
another worldview, which also explains all phenomena comfortably
and consistently.

This new worldview reveals the earth to us as a hollow sphere and
we are living on its inner (concave) surface. This hollow earth sphere
contains the whole universe inside. The earth encloses


12

.
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 02 Jun 2017 14:37 by PFIZIPFEI.
The topic has been locked.

Johannes Lang - The Hollow World Theory - Die Hohlwelttheorie 1938 - ENGLISH Translation 02 Sep 2016 12:46 #7

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960



the entire world. Therefore we call the theory, which assumes that
shape of the earth and the world, the earth world theory.

I emphasize two facts again: 1. The Copernican conception of the world
admittedly is totally unproven. 2. The earth world theory is also able to
explain the entire celestial mechanics and all other phenomena in the uni-
verse consistently. Thus, this is an explanation against explanation, world-
view against worldview case. Therefore, which one is "true" can only be
shown by real evidence.

Now then it would be quite incongruous to argue for example: Since the
explanations of Copernicans, which are allegedly representing evidence,
are untenable, there is no possibility of proof. Such an assertion would
be fundamentally wrong. The option of evidence is indeed available
within the Copernican conception of the world. In my book "Das neue
Weltbild" 1) (The New World View) I document a number of experiments
and for though their results prove the accuracy of the earth world con-
ception, they certainly would also be suitable to provide evidence for the
Copernican system - if only this worldview was consistent with natural
conditions. That it cannot be proven is not due to the lack of evidence
potentialities
. The only reason is that something that does not exist just
also cannot be proven.

Analogous Structure of Cosmos and Living Cell:

The Copernican man takes the earth for a "tiny speck of dust" and feels
an even tinier speck on the tiny speck of dust called "Planet Earth". He
"shudders" before the tremendous size of the universe, as it is written in
all popular astronomical works. Between him and the cosmos there is no
relationship. The cosmos to him is not a living organism, not an expression
of the divine spirit, but the barren infinite emptiness, in which a

_________________________________________________________
1) Schirmer & Mahlau publishing house, Frankfurt a.M., Mainzer Landstr. 184. Price 90 Pfg.


13



meaningless play of giant blazing hot gas balls is going on for
some time, which eventually also is condemned to solidify in
eternal icy night with imperative necessity. A senseless and
aimless, simply desolate construct.

The East Prussian poet Alfred Brust (supporter of the hollow world
theory) who, regrettably, passed away long before his time, once
referred to the Copernican man as the "most wretched" of all types
of people in history, because of his self-evalution as nothing more
than an insignificant "speck". The Copernican man who mastered
nature like no other type of men during the last millennia, does not
reap the deserved self-consciousness from this fact, but is standing
completely uprooted in this nature, so much intoxicated by large
figures that he is unable to recognize sober reality. He, the man, the
greatest miracle that nature created, stands in "impotent shudder"
before the "enormous size of the universe", which he, despite all of
the mental gymnastics, cannot comprehend and absorb into his
consciousness, precisely because it goes far beyond his imagination.

The Copernican man may be at great pains struggling against the
knowledge that man is "the measure of all things". This word of
the ancients is and remains a fact. Instinctively man relates every-
thing in the phenomenal world with himself, "measuring" it with human
standards. What goes beyond his imagination, can never ever be
"understood" by man and thus he cannot become aware of it. No one,
not an astronomer and not a "layman" can conceive the idea of "fixed
star distances". To man they are nothing but numerical series on paper,
incomprehensible, inconceivable - thus unsubstantial.

Great and mighty is nature, larger and more powerful the man who
masters it forcing it to serve him. But man can only become conscious
of his true greatness and importance when he is no longer trapped in
the belief in the Copernican infinity delusion.


14

.
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 02 Jun 2017 14:42 by PFIZIPFEI.
The topic has been locked.

Johannes Lang - The Hollow World Theory - Die Hohlwelttheorie 1938 - ENGLISH Translation 07 Sep 2016 16:58 #8

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960



The ancients had two sentences, the truth of which is confirmed by
the hollow world theory. They read: "As above, so below" and
"Man is a microcosm". The first sentence does not mean anything
else than that one and the same laws are effective throughout
nature. Up in space as well as down here on the earth's surface.
Everything we really know of nature, confirms this assertion. Despite
all diversity of life: the basic principles of the structures of bodies of
living organisms are the same everywhere. The basis of life is the
living cell
. The cell, however, is the exact image of the cosmos:

Compare the following illustration 1), which shows a section of the cell,
with the "cross section of the cosmos"



Illustration No. 1

Explanation: Outer circle = cell membrane. Inner circles = nuclear envelope. In
the inner circles = surface of the core with chromatin net. In between outer and
inner circle = nucleoplasm. Black sphere amid the rays = centrosome. Rays =
plasma radiation. Black sphere on the cell nucleus = core body. White spot on
the core body = nucleolus.

__________________________________________________

1) Taken from the book "Genetics" by Otto Hermann Hummel.


15




on the cover. Does one not recognise at first glance the complete
analogy, down to the tiniest details, between the structure of
the cell and that of the cosmos. The cell actually is a microcosm,
an exact replica of the big cosmos.

The earth's shell corresponds to the cell membrane, the fixed stars
sphere to the nucleus with the chromatin net, the sun to the centro-
some with the plasma radiation, the planets to the core body. The
whole cell is a hollow sphere which shows the same ratios like the
hollow sphere earth world.

The egg also shows the same ratios. It is an image of the earth world.
The yolk corresponds to the fixed stars sphere, the eggshell to the
earth's shell. But the analogy goes even further.

Paul Heep writes in the journal "Tau", No. 34, page 8: "The yolk of an
egg is constantly in rotating motion, while the egg is hatched." So
even in the movement itself the complete analogy between the
yolk and the fixed stars sphere of the earth world is showing.

Now let us look at the human egg. Even this is no exception. It is also
the true image of the cosmos, therefore of the earth world. Subsequent
illustration No. 2



Illustration No. 2

shows a section of the human egg (14 days after fertilization). We
still can clearly recognise the principally same conditions as in the
cell, the egg and the cosmos.


16

.
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 11 May 2017 17:42 by PFIZIPFEI.
The topic has been locked.

Johannes Lang - The Hollow World Theory - Die Hohlwelttheorie 1938 - ENGLISH Translation 30 Sep 2016 22:10 #9

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960

Picture supplement No. 1: Infrared photography of southwest London


17
18 (blank back of the page)







Is the hollow world theory not of a wonderful consistency? From the
utmost (cosmos) to the tiniest (microscopic egg), it shows the same
ratios. Could modern man still think truly philosophically, he, just like
the ancients, would already have been able to recognise the wonderful
harmony and unity in all creation. Man emerges from the egg, this image
of the cosmos. The cells from which he is made, are an image of the
cosmos. All life is created in the interior of a hollow sphere.

Which creatures one might also consider, life is inside. Nature remains
the same in all parts, it works always by one and the same laws, aspiring
an optimum of meaningful usefulness. Should it solely with the very greatest
and most important, the cosmos, have made an exception here alone and
have created (a bedlam of myriads of dead, blazing hot gas balls) a work
without purpose?

Something else provides the philosophically educated person with ample
food for thought. Nothing is higher in nature than the preservation of life.
As efficient as it is otherwise, to achieve the best possible performance with
the most economical means: when it comes to the preservation of life, it is
lavish in the extreme. Millions of seminal filaments are excreted during copu-
lation, of which only one can fertilize the egg. All others must perish. When it
comes to the preservation (i.e. reproduction) of life, nature wants to play it
absolutely safe. Life must not "cease" under no circumstances.

Should nature on the one hand be trying to preserve life at all costs (on
the small scale) and on the other hand let the cosmos finally die from
freezing (on the large scale), indeed? Should all the marvels of creation
and especially the greatest, man, have only been created to later have to
decay completely? Is it really true - as it is a compelling necessity in
the Copernican system - that the whole cosmos, the whole of creation


19



only consists of solidified balls of dead matter in the infinite icy emptiness
of Copernican space? Such a view is compatible with no religion - whatever
it may be. But also philosophically it is an impossible concept, because
it is in complete contradiction to all that is known of the effectiveness of nature.
Never ever can the final destruction of life be the goal of nature, as it must
derive from the consequence of the Copernican doctrin. But how many people
will ever have thought through these teachings down to the last detail?

For the philosophically thinking man the analogy is quite a sufficient prima facie
evidence of the new world view of the earth world. Those who compare the Co-
pernican system with the image of the earth world without, will have to admit that
the latter is indeed conforming with the consistency of creation of nature. If one
and the same natural laws are effective in all creation, then the principles of nature
must necessarily be the same on the large scale of events as on the small scale.
Thus the cosmos, the largest unit, must completely correspond to the cell as the
smallest unit. In the earth world view this is the case. Therefore the analogy
between the cosmos and the cell is a compelling evidence for the new world
view. Even if one could refute the results of all of our measuring evidence, this
evidence cannot be eliminated.

Now one could argue that an analogy would be no proof. But one would have to
have the presumption to say that the laws of nature are working differently on the
large scale than on the small scale in order to be able to make this objection at all.
An official scientists, by the way, cannot object against the analogy between the
cosmos and the cell shown by us, because this would indeed be directed against
the official theory of the atom, which by - an actually completely unfounded -
analogical conclusion assumes, that the atom would be a (Copernican) solar system
in miniature, although all of the results of experiments contradict this assumption.


20


(subjected to revision)
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 30 Sep 2016 22:14 by PFIZIPFEI.
The topic has been locked.

Johannes Lang - The Hollow World Theory - Die Hohlwelttheorie 1938 - ENGLISH Translation 09 Apr 2017 12:11 #10

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960




Nowhere in the world of phenomena is there any structure,
which would even have a remote analogy with the Copernican
world system. Above all, its downright preposterous to nature
sense- and purposelessness philosophically speaks against its
existence. Everything that nature creates is meaningful and pur-
poseful. It is, therefore, a philosophical impossibility that nature
should have filled the vast of the "empty space" with such infinite
masses of incalculably gigantic blazing hot gas balls.

According to newspaper reports, astronomers expect that they will
discover a further 100 million "new worlds" with the new American
giant telescope under construction. And the whole monstrous specu-
lative fiction
of this sentence is to be accepted by philosophy quietly?
Something like this simply cannot exist, for it completely contradicts
all that there is in nature and which was recognized without any doubt.
All this number jingling of "light-year distances" of the fixed stars lacks
any real foundation. It is based on a single assumption, which at that
is demonstrably false, namely the straightness of the light beam.

To what kind of simply grotesque results one must necessarily come
on the basis of this assumption can be seen from the following report
of the "F.G.A." of 29 July 1935:

"A heavyweight. - The strange heavenly dwarf.
A dwarf, which still possesses such a powerful
gravitational force that people on its surface
would simply be crushed, has lately been in-
vestigated more closely by the astronomers of
the Mount Wilson Observatory.

The small star, which is situated near Sirius and
about eighty trillion kilometers away from the earth,
could be subjected to exact measurements by the
astronomers Stebbins and Whitford with the help
of the 250-centimeter telescope and special appa-
ratuses of the observatory.

In the process it turned out that this heavenly body,
which is only about three times the size of the tiny
earth, possesses a gravitational force that is 35,000


21



times stronger and whereby even affects the incompar-
ably larger Sirius.

A human would weigh 2625 tons on this extraordinarily
compact star instead of 150 pounds - but not for a long
time, because the terrible force of gravity would flatten
him like a steam roller. He would collapse and flow in all
directions like water."

2625 tonnes are 5 1/4 million pounds. A person of normal size, of flesh
and blood, weighing 5 1/4 million pounds !? In this case, any criticism is
completely superfluous. It would only weaken the impression of this gro-
tesque assertion. Can't say: either the astronomer or the gazetteer is
insane. No matter would sustain a 35,000-fold gravitational force, not
even the hardest steel.

The astronomers Stebbins and Whitford, however, are quite right. If
the light beam is straight, then their measurement results are absolutely
correct. It may well be supposed that they understand their craft.
Based on the assumptions with which all astronomers of the world are
working, every astronomer must reach the same result. If this result is
a physical impossibility, then only the underlying assumptions can
be false.

The astronomers themselves, on account of spectral analysis, maintain
that the fixed stars consist of the same substances as the earth,
only in gaseous state. Gas, the lightest and thinnest form of the
substance, is said to be 35,000 times as heavy as the solid matter
of the earth? This is what only an astronomer can claim!

We, on the other hand, cannot only prove the analogy between the
cosmos and the cell, but we can also provide the analogy between
structures on the surface of the earth and cosmic structures in detail.

Here are some examples:

In the earth world we have a circuit of light, which corresponds precisely
to the lines of force of the magnetic field.


22
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 31 May 2017 13:44 by PFIZIPFEI.
The topic has been locked.

Johannes Lang - The Hollow World Theory - Die Hohlwelttheorie 1938 - ENGLISH Translation 11 May 2017 13:42 #11

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960




Even according to the Copernican view the earth is some kind of big magnet.
Is it not quite logical then that the light beams follow the lines of this "earth
magnet"? Figure 3 shows the lines of force of a magnet, drawn into the earth
world.



Illustration No. 3

(These lines of force are obtained by placing a sheet of paper on a
strong magnet and sprinkling it with fine iron filings. The magnetic force
is then arranging them according to the lines of force of the magnet.)


Reinhold Rüdenberg, Professor, Dr.-Ing. and Dr.-Ing. c. h., In his work
"Transmitting and Receiving Electric Shafts" 1) points to the fundamental
analogousness of light and radio waves. He then presents the following
illustration, which is a "polar diagram of the field strength of quadripole
antennas".
Taking the fundamental analogousness of light and radio waves into account,
there is indeed every reason to suppose that this measured field fully
corresponds to light propagation in the earth world.

___________________________________________________________
1) Julius Springer Publishing House, Berlin.


23



Long before Professor Rüdenberg came to this diagram by means of
measurements, the drawings of light propagation in the earth world
already existed. This diagram now is an analogy between our light curves
and the antenna field of the electric waves down to the smallest detail.





Illustration No. 4


I could point out a number of additional analogies, but I would like to
confine myself to the above mentioned. For the philosophically thinking
man, the question in favour of which conception of the world he is to decide,
is already decided by the complete analogy between the cosmos and the
cell in the conception of the earth world. The non-philosophically thinking
man, on the other hand, can not be convinced by philosophical reasons.
But he also will have no choice but to admit that he believes in a con-
ception of the world, which is not proven and can by no means be proven.
However, this Copernican conception of this world contains a whole number
of details, which are physically impossible. On the whole, in its purposeless-
ness and futility and its objective of ultimate destruction of the world, it is a
philosophical impossibility


24
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 30 May 2017 08:21 by PFIZIPFEI.
The topic has been locked.

Johannes Lang - The Hollow World Theory - Die Hohlwelttheorie 1938 - ENGLISH Translation 29 May 2017 15:48 #12

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960



The philosophical thinking man needs no further evidence. He must already be
convinced of the fundamental correctness of the new conception of the world.
For non-philosophically thinking people, however, we have the proofs of mea-
surement, which could not be disproved so far. He will not be able to escape
their strength of evidence.


Proof of Measurement: The Straight Line.

Since, as is known, the surface of the sea and of any other standing water has
the curvature of the globe, it is only necessary to install a straight line above
this surface of the water, in order to be able to ascertain the curvature clearly.
If Copernicus is right and the surface of the earth is curved convex, then the
distance between the straight line and the surface of the water must increase
with progressing length. If, however, the surface of the earth were curved con-
cavely
, the ends of the corresponding straight line would finally have to meet
the surface of the water.

Subsequent illustration No. 5 will clearly show this. 1)




Illustration No. 5


This experiment is a perfect proof of one or the other conception of the
world, depending on how it turns out. The American Professor Morrow
performed this experiment and it turned out to prove the concave cur-
vature of the surface of the earth without any doubt. The reader will find
more information about this in the original work of Professor Morrow

________________________________________________________
1) All the drawings in this work are greatly exaggerated for the sake of better understanding.
As a result of the large dimensions involved, a scale-accurate representation is not possible.



25




„Cellular Cosmogony" (Guiding Star Pub. House, Estero, Lee Co.,
Florida, U.S.A.)

There were attempts to object that the creation of such a straight line is
not possible. But this is nothing but an excuse. Prof. Morrow has shown
that it is possible. This is no problem at all for today's precision technology,
which achieves accuracies of one thousandth millimeter with ease. Many
engineers, who are proponents of the hollow world theory, only will have
a weary smile for this objection. They are experts, while those who made
this objection had no knowledge of the matter itself. Every engineer can
create this straight line using the "Rectilineator" designed by Professor
Morrow.

Because these are significant differences, the possible inaccuracies in
measurement do not play any significant role. At a distance of 8 kilometers,
the straight line deviates already by more than 5 meters from the surface
of the water (convex earth) or approaches it by more than 5 meters (con-
cave earth). This is more than 10 meters difference between convex and
concave. As I foresee the objection by the Copernicans that these differen-
ces can not be measured, I declare: the professors of astronomy, who have
done the marvelous work to measure the parallaxes of the fixed stars, which
are less than an arc second, thus less than four thousandths of a degree,
who have worked - without any result - on the verification of etheric wind with
accuracies of millionsths of a millimeter, should not be able to measure a de-
viation of 10 meters? 1) This would mean to undervalue their abilities after all.
If, however, they should be too modest, there is a large number of engineers
and technicians among the adherents of the theory of hollow world theory,
who are skilled at precise measurements, also several geodesists, ie distin-
guished specialists, who will gladly volunteer for such an experiment.

________________________________________________________
1) One arc second is the 1,296.000th part of a circle!


26
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 03 Jun 2017 09:45 by PFIZIPFEI.
The topic has been locked.

Johannes Lang - The Hollow World Theory - Die Hohlwelttheorie 1938 - ENGLISH Translation 31 May 2017 13:14 #13

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960




Incidentally, the average possible measurement inaccuracy in Professor
Morrow's Rectilineator is only 0.0000015 inches. These are 0.000381
millimeters. The possible error in a measurement is therefore less than
four ten thousandths
of a millimeter. But does one ten thousandth of
a millimeter
really matter when it comes to finding a difference of no
less than 10 meters
?

It is nothing but a shamefully ridiculous excuse to say that one could not
measure a difference of 10 meters in height over a length of 8 kilometers.
The following report from „Wissen und Fortschritt" ("Knowledge and Pro-
gress"), 1937, shows what great achievements our measuring technology
is capable of accomplishing:

"The Millionth-Second Clock: At the Funkschau 1936, the electron beam
clock was on display, with which ... even the sixtieth part of one millionth of a
second can be measured."

Why, then, do we not want to decide on the question of convex or concave in
all objectivity by performing the experiment together? Why "fitly assail our
foes with words", when a quarrel is not necessary at all? Truly objective sci-
entists, animated with genuine scientific curiosity, might not rest until the ex-
periment had been carried out, until they would have obtained certainty of
whether the earth's surface is convex or concave.

As the great Copernican Galileo once said so beautifully:
"We must measure what is measurable and make measurable what is
not yet so."
It is a pity that today we have no Galileo among our astronomers,
and Galileo would certainly not refuse to measure.

On this occasion I will make a fundamental statement. All objections raised
to date are presumptions. They say, "It might well be possible ...", or some-
thing like that. Certainly everything "could be" possible. All that matters is that
which actually exists. By "It could be" one cannot dispose of facts. The mea-
surement results, however, are facts.


27




Illustration No. 6/7

Erdoberfläche = earth's surface
oben = top
unten = bottom
Zum Mittelpunkt = toward centre
Vom Mittelpunkt = fromward centre


28
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 31 May 2017 13:15 by PFIZIPFEI.
The topic has been locked.

Johannes Lang - The Hollow World Theory - Die Hohlwelttheorie 1938 - ENGLISH Translation 02 Jun 2017 13:17 #14

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960



Well, it is a good practice in science that anyone who does not agree with
the result of an experiment must repeat it and also prove the presumed
error. As long as this has not happened, the correctness of the result of an
experiment must be acknowledged. Every other position is unscientific.

Yet the situation is as follows: The representatives of the Copernican system
have not been able to provide any proof in the 400 years for its existence.
Here they are given a possibility to provide evidence. It was to be assumed
that they would gladly grasp the opportunity. If the experiment carried out by
them showed that the straight line is diverging from the surface of the water
as the length increases, then the Copernican system would be perfectly
proved
. Why is this possibility of demonstration avoided? One does not
seem to be particularly convinced that the result would be in favour of the
Copernican system!

The behavior of conventional science in this case is completely unscientific.
They are struggling to keep the result of an experiment under wraps, in-
stead of refuting it. This behavior leaves no other conclusion than that the
result of Professor Morrow's experiment is not to be disproved. The fact
remains that the new conception of the earth world is proven, whereas the
Copernican conception of the earth is not.

Proof of Measurement: The Diverging Plumbs.

In the Tamarack mine in Calumet (USA), two plumbs were lowered down to
a depth of 1,300 meters. The measurements showed that the plumbs

_________________________________________________________
To the adjacent drawings No. 6/7: Above: Full-spherical earth with a convex surface. On top
mountains, trees etc. The two plumbs facing the center of the earth would have to approach
each other with increasing depth. Below: hollow sphere earth with a concave earth surface.
On top mountains, trees, etc. The two plumbs would have to diverge from one another with
increasing depth. The measurements showed that this is indeed the case. This proves that we
are living on the inner concave surface of a hollow sphere.



29



diverged with increasing depth, rather than approaching each other,
as would have been the case if we lived on the outer convex side of
the earth.


The measurements in the Tamarack mine were not initially undertaken as an
experiment, but required for practical purposes by the engineers. The engi-
neers were so surprised at the results of their measurements that they first
thought of any sources of error. They therefore consulted Professor Mc. Nair
of the "Michigan College of Mines", whose measurements confirmed that the
plumbs were diverging from one another at the bottom, instead of approaching
each other. The experiments were then repeated for several years with ex-
tremely accurate instruments with the same result.

These latter measurements are particularly important. For they were not taken
by supporters of the hollow world theory. Professor Mc. Nair did not desire
the obtained result, but the opposite. He made the greatest efforts to achieve
a different result by continually changing the materials used for the plumbs.
To no avail! Again and again the measurements showed that the earth's sur-
face is not convex but concave.

Relating to this I received letters in which the objection (better: the assumption)
was raised, that the plumbs could have been diverted by the surrounding mass
of the earth. Giving this aspect a moment's thought, however, clearly shows the
untenability of this objection. The masses in the vicinity of the shaft (1,300 m
depth!) are Copernican the same on all sides. Consequently, the deflection by
mass attraction is equally strong on all sides. It is quite different if you suspend
a plumb on the surface of the earth near a mountain massif. But even there the
deflection is so tiny that it would never yield the measured huge differences. In-
cidentally: none of my readers will be so naive as to suppose that an opponent
of the earth world theory, such as Professor Mc. Nair, would take the trouble of
years of investigation, if there was even the slightest possibility of explaining
the matter anyhow differently.


30
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 04 Jun 2017 12:15 by PFIZIPFEI.
The topic has been locked.

Johannes Lang - The Hollow World Theory - Die Hohlwelttheorie 1938 - ENGLISH Translation 03 Jun 2017 13:17 #15

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960



Furthermore: There are far apart shafts of great depth, which are connected
by a straight tunnel at the bottom. There the measurements would have to
yield great differences between the ratios of the convex and the concave
earth. In the Tamarack mine, there are two shafts which are 4,250 feet deep,
connected by a straight tunnel of 3,200 feet in length. I had an expert (en-
gineer) calculate the divergence of the plumbs on the convex earth and it
would be 0.166 meters, whereas in the concave earth it would be 0.184 me-
ters. The deviation between both ratios would be 35 cm. Every geodesist
would surely perceive it as an insult to his profession, if someone claimed
that it is not possible to measure such differences properly.

Why are such experiments not performed? We do not have the money
and the Copernicans fear the result!

The Sail Experiment.


A reader of my brochure "Das neue Weltbild" ("The New Conception of
the World") sent me a copy of the "Der widerlegte Kopernikus" ("The Re-
futed Copernicus"), published in the 26/1935 edition of the "Braunen Post",
in which their scientific assistant Alwin Dreßler covers, among other things,
an experiment by Captain Bredow to verify the earth world theory. In the
following I will give you an account of the most important part of the essay:

"He stretched a long, wide canvas under tension between the mastheads,
so that the cloth hovered parallel to the deck of the ship, that is, in horizon-
tal position above the ship from mast to mast. The upper canvas surface
was white, the lower bright red. Mirrors were placed in the crow's nests,
which reflected the sun light on the lower surface of the canvas in order
to make the red color still visible from the greatest distance. Captain Bredow
went out into the sea with his ship. The hull of the ship became smaller and
smaller and gradually began to disappear completely, while only the two
mastheads, the rigging and the stretched canvas were visible.


31



The red color could clearly be seen through binoculars, which served
as a proof to the observers that the lower surface of the canvas was
still facing them. If now the downward curvature of the globe was, ac-
cording to the Copernican view, a fact, the lower red canvas surface
had to widen gradually, as the ship on the downward bent globe had
to turn more and more forwards in downward direction, so that the red
surface of the canvas was visible to the last moment before its complete
disappearance. Then, to the greatest astonishment of all observers, the
opposite happened: the red canvas gradually became smaller and the
dazzling white of the upper surface of the canvas suddenly appeared
and became increasingly distinct! The monitoring scientists observed
what was going on with perplexed looks on their faces, for they were
confronted with the fact that the ship was not tilting downwards, but
rather inclining rearwards, that is to say it sailed up the surface of the
sea, which — contrary to their previous conception — arched upwards."

For a better understanding of the reader, I will add a graphic explanation.
You c a n n o t see the l o w e r


Illustration No. 8

but the u p p er side of the sail, streched parallel to the surface of the sea.

This phenomenon can not be explained by Copernican conceptions. How-
ever, if we do not claim this as a proof of the concave surface of the earth,
it is only from the fundamental point of view that there can be no optical evi-
dence for or against any theory.


32
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 04 Jun 2017 11:56 by PFIZIPFEI.
The topic has been locked.

Johannes Lang - The Hollow World Theory - Die Hohlwelttheorie 1938 - ENGLISH Translation 04 Jun 2017 20:32 #16

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7960



For it can well be suppose that we are far from knowing all possible "opti-
cal illusions." If we prove that the conception of the firmament as a bell is
based on a huge optical illusion, that the so-called "wonderfully accurate"
distance measurements of our astronomers are based on an optical illusion,
then you will be steeped in legitimate mistrust regarding all optical observa-
tions and logically must categorically reject all optical evidence — also
those in our favour. This is necessary simply because we unequivocally
know that the light beam is indeed curving under given conditions, but we
do not yet know all of these conditions so far as to be able to set up inter-
ference laws and to calculate the path of the light beam.

Why do I bring the experiment to the knowledge of my readers, nonetheless?
Because it effectively refutes the so-called "ship's proof" for the convex earth.

If we assume that the sail was 30 meters above the surface of the ocean, then
the ship must, according to the Copernican theory, be lowered 30 meters be-
low the straight line by the convex curvature of the surface of the sea, so that
it disappears from the field of vision in the case of the alleged straightness of
the light beam. But then the ship must have lowered in the case of a convex
shape of the earth and the lower surface of the sail must imperatively be in
evidence. Anyone who denies this denies the Copernican explanation of the
phenomenon of the gradual disappearance of a ship which is moving away from
the observer. Theoretical calculations showed that a ship disappears much
earlier than would correspond to the alleged convex curvature of the sea sur-
face. It is a very unfortunate fact that our scientists have never felt obliged to
take measurements in this respect. One was contented with appearances,
thus with conjectures.



33




However, scientists are not supposed to "believe", but to prove. 1)

We, as representatives of the hollow world theory, claim greater merit in the
knowledge than in the demonstration of the weaknesses of the Copernican
system. But even the most inveterate Copernicans should be grateful to us
for pointing out these weaknesses

Here in particular they would have an opportunity to carry out exact measure-
ments at extremely low costs, in order to gain knowledge instead of faith.
Why aren't they doing that?

Infrared Photographs.

The invention of photography by means of infrared rays allowed for images,
which are only possible in the concave earth. Please refer to the picture sup-
plement No. 1. This photo was taken by means of plates sensitive to infrared
rays. It depicts the South West of London. The "Frankfurter Illustrierte Zeitung"
(No. 30/1932), from which I excerpted this picture, writes: "The entire south-west
of London appears close together. In fact, the picture covers a space of several
square kilometers, which is never visible to the eye, not even with the most beau-
tiful weather."

Allow for a few minutes to take a closer look at the image. The whole impression
is the same as if this was the aerial view of a valley basin. It looks as if the ground
bulges in the direction of the background. We see the park's trees in the back-
ground (resembling clouds) obliquely from above.

Can this effect be caused by the height of the camera? Is it an aerial photograph?

_______________________________________________________________
1) Please note in this connection also the messages elsewhere of a visibility range (both of the eye and
of the infrared photograph), which is far greater than the "earth curvature" would allow for.



34
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 04 Jun 2017 20:43 by PFIZIPFEI.
The topic has been locked.
Moderators: PFIZIPFEI
Powered by Kunena Forum

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it. Secure transactions via paypal.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2019 - May 2020, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 270 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 100 - Raised
( £ 80 GBP )
donation thermometer
29%
Updated
31st May 2019

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.