Your donations are appreciated and help keep this site running. Even the smallest amount helps.
Thankyou

 
PROMOTE YOUR SITE
HERE
Only $3 USD/month
TRUTHSPOON.COM
The man they can't recruit!
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: Hollow Earth

Hollow Earth 28 Jul 2013 20:26 #1

  • chandrakavi
  • chandrakavi's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Underground Researcher
  • Posts: 651
  • Likes received: 263
Last Edit: 28 Jul 2013 20:28 by chandrakavi.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: cantata, PFIZIPFEI

Hollow Earth 28 Jul 2013 20:38 #2

  • cantata
  • cantata's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 2481
  • Likes received: 2679
Oh thanks for this, Chandrakavi. :) I'll start watching this in a while. I've become more interested in this stuff recently, so this is very welcome.

And it's lovely to see you posting again.

:)
"...Wyrde saves oft the man undoomed
if he undaunted be....". (Beowulf).

"The most beautiful people we have known are those who have known defeat, known suffering, known struggle, known loss, and have found their way out of the depths... Beautiful people do not just happen". (Elisabeth Kubler-Ross).


:cavalier
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: chandrakavi

Hollow Earth 28 Jul 2013 21:41 #3

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7961
There are theories about a hollow earth and about a concave WORLD, very interesting topics!
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 28 Jul 2013 21:41 by PFIZIPFEI.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: chandrakavi

Hollow Earth 28 Jul 2013 21:44 #4

  • chandrakavi
  • chandrakavi's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Underground Researcher
  • Posts: 651
  • Likes received: 263
Found this interesting video, seems to be a French production,

The Orion Conspiracy Full -


25/12/2011 -


Thank you cantata
Thank you pfizpfei, glad to see you all again friends!

:)
Last Edit: 28 Jul 2013 21:48 by chandrakavi.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: cantata, PFIZIPFEI

Hollow Earth 01 Aug 2013 06:08 #5

  • chandrakavi
  • chandrakavi's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Underground Researcher
  • Posts: 651
  • Likes received: 263
PFIZIPFEI wrote:
There are theories about a hollow earth and about a concave WORLD, very interesting topics!

Here is a good video, with good photos on it mate,



19/03/2012 - ‎Subido por pokertron
World Top Secret - Inside the Hollow Earthby JR ReportingFeatured ... Dr. Hank Krastman ...
Last Edit: 02 Aug 2013 22:12 by chandrakavi.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: cantata, PFIZIPFEI

Hollow Earth 04 Aug 2013 18:15 #6

  • chandrakavi
  • chandrakavi's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Underground Researcher
  • Posts: 651
  • Likes received: 263
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: cantata, PFIZIPFEI

Hollow Earth 05 Aug 2013 14:43 #7

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7961
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: chandrakavi

Hollow Earth 05 Aug 2013 19:36 #8

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7961
Great thread you started on that other forum, Chandra!
I wish this one will get at least equally remarkable contributions and much more views.

There I found this 2008 video





and I became curious to see what those "entrances" look like now on google earth.




66°33'13.75"S, 99°50'24.84"E











66°36'14.70"S, 99°43'11.11"E








Exact same pictures if you ask me. I just turned them downside up.
Is this the usual thing that google does not upload new photos over a time span of 4 - 5 years?



I would so much love to fly over this beautiful place where you are not allowed to.

"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 05 Aug 2013 19:48 by PFIZIPFEI.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: chandrakavi

Hollow Earth 06 Aug 2013 03:27 #9

  • chandrakavi
  • chandrakavi's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Underground Researcher
  • Posts: 651
  • Likes received: 263
It's an interesting video, for Hollow Earth see 37:53



history channel alien cities underground, hollow earth ... -

14/05/2013 -
HISTORY CHANNEL ALIEN CITIES UNDERGROUND, HOLLOW EARTH AND PLANETS NEW ...
Last Edit: 06 Aug 2013 03:31 by chandrakavi.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: cantata, PFIZIPFEI

Hollow Earth 06 Aug 2013 03:56 #10

  • chandrakavi
  • chandrakavi's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Underground Researcher
  • Posts: 651
  • Likes received: 263
The Nazis sought to prove that the earth was hollow.
In a book called : MAYA: Reality is an Illusion by Miguel Serrano
I find in the last chapter the following , that is said about the Hollow Earth:

"Three years ago, i received an unexpected visit of a world known writer.
It came from Germany to bring an extraordinary document: a letter written by
a German submariner that said to be "inside the earth", because Rudolph Hess and Haushofer were right: THE EARTH IS HOLLOW.

The handwritten letter, in german dated April 20, 1947 ,
meant to say that these "syncronisms" come to support us, because as the alquimist
says: "If you are doing the job right, unknown friends will come to your help..." and "even if you find yourself alone in your room, your thoughts will be heard thousands of leagues of
distance from where you are"...

TRANSLATION:
April 20, 1947
Dear old comrade:
This letter will be a surprise to you. The submarine U-Boot 209 has made it. The Earth is HOLLOW! Dr. Haushofer and Hess were right. The entire crew finds itself well, but we cannot return. We are not prisioners. I am sure that this message will arrive to you; this is the last contact wiith U-209. We will see each other again comrade..
Signature ILLEGIBLE


Letter from Hans Willi to Howard Emmajean, dated may 8, 1990
Dear howard &Emmajean.

The two briefs received of 7 mai and R.C. Thank you so much!!!

The mission of the U-290 was one of the most fanstastic missions
of the Third Reich. It certainly involved the Occultist influence of
Hitler, Himmler, Heydtrich and Dr. Larl Hauschofer....

The mission of the U-290 was to follow ancient charts, and to enter
a gigantic undersea mountain opening. This was believed to lead to the Center of the Earth!! Yes, it was beleived that in the center lay Agharta!!!

The U-290 did not return, and thus the letter from an old friend
who was aboard the 290. This letter states that the U-290's mission
was completed, that the earth IS HOLLOW, and not only that, also inhabited. The boat was commanded by Heinnrich Brodda.

The mission was entitled ASGARD

The man who wrote me the letter while I was staying with my cousins was
JOSEPH MUNDT. Special appointee of the Reich's mysterious AHNENERBE
bureau under Himler and Heydrich. This is and still is the Ancestral
Bureau of the Nordic Race, which came from the north, and believed that
they came from an opening near the North Polar area ,which led to the Center
of the Earth..........Many old nordic legends claim this as well as
several Native American Legends (Amerindians).

Mundt was not in Argentina, the letter was mailed from there ,Stating that
the U-290 accomplished its mission, but none could return, yet they were NOT prisioners. Most strange and I know that this defies the credibility of RATIONAL THOUGHT though,
but I think there are many things we DO NOT KNOW.

Haushofer, very strange pronouncement on the Obelisk, in Runic Symbols,
Beyond this point lies Agharta, and there are more things IN Heaven and In EARTH
THAT MAN HAS DREAMT.........As stated previously, there was a most profound influence in the Third Reich of the Occult or is Occut sometimes TRUTH that is not yet understood,
or perhaps OLD knowledge that man has lost his way in this world after losing it....

The 629 had her encounter with a flying Disc off Afrika in Mai 1943.
Some place that film still exists. I think it is very likely the very
first photos of a Flying Disc, alter seen by allied and Luftwaffe
pilots over Europe.

A most pleasant sojourn to you both my friends in EUROPA(::
An Angel in the front and Angel in the back for your protection and guidance while away.
God bless you both.

Faithfully

WILLIE


Edit:
I personally think that these letters could or could not mean something, but it is worth
looking at the information about the Hollow Earth, and the distance dates between each letter 1947 and 1990. It is for us to decide..
Last Edit: 06 Aug 2013 04:03 by chandrakavi.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: cantata, PFIZIPFEI

Hollow Earth 06 Aug 2013 16:30 #11

  • chandrakavi
  • chandrakavi's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Underground Researcher
  • Posts: 651
  • Likes received: 263
Admiral Richard E. Byrd (25October 1888-11 March 1957) in Wikipedia.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_E._Byrd.
Last Edit: 06 Aug 2013 19:12 by chandrakavi.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Hollow Earth 06 Aug 2013 19:37 #12

  • chandrakavi
  • chandrakavi's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Underground Researcher
  • Posts: 651
  • Likes received: 263
mysterioushollowearth.webs.com/phaedoparas600624.htm

Plato speaks of a Hollow Earth




605-"Also I believe that the earth is very vast, and that we who dwell in the region extending from the river Phasis to the Pillars of Heracles, along the borders of the sea, are just like ants or frogs about a marsh, and inhabit a small portion only, and that many others dwell in many like places.

For I should say that in all parts of the earth there are hollows of various forms and sizes, into which the water and the mist and the air collect; and that the true earth is pure and in the pure heaven, in which also are the stars—that is the heaven which is commonly spoken of as the ether, of which this is but the sediment collecting in the hollows of the earth.

But we who live in these hollows are deceived into the notion that we are dwelling above on the surface of the earth; which is just as if a creature who was at the bottom of the sea were to fancy that he was on the surface of the water, and that the sea was the heaven through which he saw the sun and the other stars—he having never come to the surface by reason of his feebleness and sluggishness, and having never lifted up his head and seen, nor ever heard from one who had seen, this region which is so much purer and fairer than his own.

Now this is exactly our case: for we are dwelling in a hollow of the earth, and fancy that we are on the surface; and the air we call the heaven, and in this we imagine that the stars move. But this is also owing to our feebleness and sluggishness, which prevent our reaching the surface of the air: for if any man could arrive at the exterior limit, or take the wings of a bird and fly upward, like a fish who puts his head out and sees this world, he would see a world beyond; and, if the nature of man could sustain the sight, he would acknowledge that this was the place of the true heaven and the true light and the true stars.

For this earth, and the stones, and the entire region which surrounds us are spoilt and corroded, like the things in the sea which are corroded by the brine; for in the sea too there is hardly any noble or perfect growth, but clefts only, and sand, and an endless slough of mud: and even the shore is not to be compared to the fairer sights of this world. And greater far is the superiority of the other. Now of that upper earth which is under the heaven, I can tell you a charming tale, Simmias, which is well worth hearing."
Last Edit: 06 Aug 2013 19:42 by chandrakavi.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: PFIZIPFEI

Hollow Earth 06 Aug 2013 19:50 #13

  • chandrakavi
  • chandrakavi's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Underground Researcher
  • Posts: 651
  • Likes received: 263
PFIZIPFEI wrote:
Great thread you started on that other forum, Chandra!
I wish this one will get at least equally remarkable contributions and much more views.

There I found this 2008 video





and I became curious to see what those "entrances" look like now on google earth.




66°33'13.75"S, 99°50'24.84"E











66°36'14.70"S, 99°43'11.11"E








Exact same pictures if you ask me. I just turned them downside up.
Is this the usual thing that google does not upload new photos over a time span of 4 - 5 years?



I would so much love to fly over this beautiful place where you are not allowed to.


Great post mate!
Lots of books have been written on Hollow Earth,
We did a Radio show in IL with one of Many and I Am All I Am, in SIMPLE TRUTH RADIO
Don't know where that is now,
Last Edit: 06 Aug 2013 19:57 by chandrakavi.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: PFIZIPFEI

Hollow Earth 07 Aug 2013 00:27 #14

  • chandrakavi
  • chandrakavi's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Underground Researcher
  • Posts: 651
  • Likes received: 263
dioi.org/kn/halleyhollow.htm

THE HOLLOW WORLD OF EDMOND HAILLEY

Three hundred years ago in 1692, an article by Edmond Halley proposed that the Earth was hollow.(1) Its theory was based on the value of lunar relative density given by Isaac Newton. The first edition of Newton’s Principia (1687) found that “... the mass of the Moon will be to the mass of the Earth as 1 to 26, approximately”, citing the relative densities of Moon to Earth as 9 to 5.(2) This value of lunar relative mass was in excess by a factor of three, as the true mass ratio is 1:81. Arguably the most significant error in the Principia’s Book III, it left an ultra-dense Moon circling our Earth.(3) Edmond Halley simply invoked these figures: “Sir Isaac Newton has demonstrated the Moon to be more solid than our Earth, as 9 to 5; why may we not then suppose four ninths of our globe to be cavity?”(4) It is remarkable that so erroneous a figure, having such unlikely implications, could be thus presented without need for further justification. Halley’s theory appeared as the first significant deduction to be drawn from the Principia.

Newton’s estimate of lunar relative density was derived from the relative tide­raising powers of the Sun and Moon. The Principia had ascertained fairly well the relative density of the Sun, as a quarter that of the Earth (Book III, Prop. 37, Cor. 3), and so by comparing the components of tidal attraction of the two luminaries the lunar relative density was thereby inferred. This was a quite valid method, as shown by the way that French theoretical astronomers used it in the mid-eighteenth century to obtain their estimates of lunar relative mass.(5) However, the Principia’s treatment thereof went greatly astray. It started from the difference between spring and neap tides which occurred twice each month, taking data from Plymouth and in the Bristol channel that gave that ratio as 41 to 23, or 9 to 5.

Newton apprehended (in Proposition 37) that the tide-raising forces of the Sun and Moon varied inversely as the cube of their distances from Earth: only thus would the Moon have a stronger attraction for the tides than the Sun.(6) It was evident to Newton that the solar gravity pull (varying inversely as the square of the distance) was several hundred times stronger than that of the Moon, whatever assumptions about relative densities were made. The Princi­pia’s tidal argument hinged upon this inverse-cube relationship, with little by way of demonstration. Its method of inferring lunar relative density from such considerations would have baffled his contemporaries. Astronomy textbooks by Newtonians such as Whiston and Gregory in the early eighteenth century omitted this argument, for they had no means of following it.

The Principia formulated the equation (S+L)/(S-L) = 9/5, where S and L were tide-raising vectors varying inversely as the cube of distance. Newton apprehended that the ratio involved differentials or gravity field gradients across the Earth and not the forces as such; and that these would sum to maximum values at both the full and new moon positions, but subtract as vectors when the forces were at right angles to each other, that is, at the quadrature positions. This is all quite impressive, and solving the above equation would have given him L:S = 3.5:1, far less disastrous than his final result. For comparison, the astronomically correct ratio of the tide-raising powers of the Moon and Sun is 2.17:1,(7) though we may note that the mean value of this ratio around the shores of Britain is slightly over three to one, as the extent to which the solar (12 hour) and lunar (12.4 hour) diurnal rhythms resonate in the sea varies with local geography.

Instead of solving this equation, Newton inserted various adjustments, of somewhat doubtful astronomical significance,(8) bringing the L:S ratio to 6.3:1. In the Principia’s second edition of 1713, the computation was emended to give an Earth/Moon mass ratio of 39.371 to 1, which became in the third edition 39.788 to 1, thereby reducing its lunar mass estimate to merely 100% in excess of the correct value. From this estimate the second edition obtained a baricentre position (i.e. common centre of gravity of the Earth-Moon system), misplacing it as permanently outside the Earth.(9) Scholars normally refer only to the second and third editions in the context of lunar theory, and I have found no mention of the first edition’s 1:26 Moon/Earth mass ratio estimate in the literature. But developments after the first edition were not used by Halley in his advocacy of a hollow Earth, and we will not refer to them in what follows. Halley viewed Newton’s tidal theory as one of the finest achievements of the Principia’s first edition, as the two reviews he wrote for it make clear (10).

Internal Structure of the Earth

From the study of magnetic compass variations, Halley by 1683 had reached the quite original conclusion that the Earth possessed four magnetic poles (11). He described in the Philosophical transactions of that year how two of these poles were located in the “Southern ocean” and the two northern ones were in the Bering Strait and Spitzbergen (12). However he could not account for the existence of multiple poles, nor their gradual displacement with time, acknowledging that the latter depended on “secrets as yet utterly unknown to Mankind” (13).

Various attempts had been made to account for the gradual motion of the lines of magnetic declination by a few minutes of arc each year, as this had great relevance to navigation.(14) Descartes for example had suggested that such motion was due to physical accretion and movement of iron ore deposits (15), but Halley realized during his 1676 voyage to St Helena that no theory depending on surface deposits of iron could explain the compass variations. Henry Bond claimed to be able to predict secular changes in terrestrial magnetism, and in 1674 the King set up a committee to investigate this claim (16). Robert Hooke, who was a member of the committee, proposed in 1674 that the magnetic poles were moving in a circular path at 10° from the geographic poles, possibly rotating once in 370 years (17).

Halley had gathered much data on the subject from his voyage to St Helena, as he also had from the unpublished manuscripts of Peter Perkins. Perkins had been researching this topic and addressed the Royal Society on the subject in 1680 some months before his death. Halley purchased Perkins’s papers on the variation of geomagnetism immediately following the latter’s demise (18).While it is true that Halley never acknowledged this, it is equally true that nothing has substantiated Flamsteed’s allegation that components of Halley’s theory de­rived from Perkins. Perkins was developing a theory of his own to account for the variation, as was indicated in his address to the Royal Society, but it is hard to discern any resemblance to that developed by Halley (19). The first part of Halley’s 1692 essay commented on the inadequacy of existing theories, conclud­ing that something deep below Earth’s surface must be causing the phenomenon.

Halley had been much involved with the production of the Principia, and it now seemed to provide him with a key. Its estimate of the Earth/Moon mass ratio suggested to him that the Earth was hollow. How else could that ratio be explained? The germ of the idea may have dawned upon him while reading Burnet’s Sacred theory of the Earth which had appeared (in Latin) in 1681. This assigned hollow cavities to the Earth, catacombs and subterranean grottoes, but did so in a traditional mode in accord with classic myth and lore (20). The tenor of Burnet’s vision was, as Schaffer has observed (21), in stark contrast to that of Halley.

With this assumption, Halley could gain a physical explanation for the existence of his four magnetic poles, and also their motions. Within the Earth, concentric to its hollow shell and rotating coaxially, he discerned another sphere, whose existence had hitherto been unsuspected. Possibly there were further spheres hidden within that one. Both spheres had magnetic poles embedded within them at a distance from their common axis of rotation. A very gradual differential rotation between the two spheres accounted for the drift of the magnetic poles with time. One pair of magnetic poles was stationary, being embedded in the outer shell, while the other pair drifted westwards, because the inner sphere was revolving at a slower rate. Of the two northern poles, Halley opined that the pole due north of Land’s End was the moving one, while the other lying on a meridian through California, at some 15° from the pole, was static. Of the two southern poles, that south of America was the moving one.

Halley’s Earth was composed of an outer shell 500 miles thick, with an air gap of the same distance between it and the inner sphere. To the objection that the latter might collide with the outer shell, and thereby damage it, he explained that it was held at the centre by the force of gravity. Halley was confident his readers would perceive the necessity of this: “should these globes be adjusted once to the same common centre, the Gravity of the parts of the Concave would press towards the centre of the inner ball ... it follows that the Nucleus being once fixt in the common centre, must always here remain (22). Halley pointed out that “the Ring environing the Globe of Saturn”, which remained coaxial to the planet, was held there by gravity. (No-one then knew that Saturn’s rings were rotating. The Principia had not discussed the matter.) By analogy, could not gravity also hold a globe concentric inside the hollow Earth?

Happily, Halley’s argument was in accord with “Almighty Wisdom”, which would not have arranged all the matter of Earth “barely to support its surface”. Rather, the matter had been distributed “to yield as great a Surface for the use of living Creatures as can consist with the conveniency and security of the whole”. Halley acknowledged that there might be objections to his new theory: for example, might not the oceans leak away if an earthquake opened up a crack beneath them, leading to flooding of the lower regions? His answer was that within the ground there existed “saline and Vitriolick Particles as may contri­bute to petrefaction”. Water flowing down would soon find its path blocked by these petrifying particles.

“I have adventured to make these Subterranean orbs capable of being inhabited”, Halley added, in words for which science fiction writers of futurity would be grateful (23). His reason for this was, that all nature teemed with life. The argument was teleological. His under-world would be occupied, as the planets too were doubtless inhabited, and so some illumination was therefore needed: “The concave arches may in several places shine with such a substance as invests the surface of the Sun.” Halley conceded that he was here using a “final cause” in asserting that the luminosity of the upper atmospheres of his under-world was provided for its denizens.

It has been argued by David Kubrin that Halley took over Robert Hooke’s view of the Earth as “a series of concentric shells, one of which contained the magnetic poles”, and that Halley’s model of internal terrestrial structure was “rather similar to Hooke’s (24). David Oldroyd has likewise claimed that “... Hooke’s theory was thought sufficiently adequate to furnish a model for the structure of the Earth by Halley in 1692, in his explanation of the Earth’s magnetic poles (25). There are however objections to this view.

Hooke’s model of the Earth’s interior was layered like an onion, and hardly resembled that developed by Halley (26). There is indeed no single feature which the two views shared in common. Hooke’s model lacked any air-gaps between its strata, or subterranean spheres, or principle of differential rotation, or multiple magnetic poles; nor had it any mechanism for a rotation of magnetic poles around the geographic poles. Only, in Hooke’s view, in the Earth’s pristine condition may it once have had spherical concentric shells of matter, but earthquakes had long since disrupted that ideal scheme. Hooke did not locate the Earth’s magnetic power in a specific shell as Kubrin claimed, but rather left it diffusely spread through the “magnetical core or Magnetical Globe of the Earth (27). These views appeared in Hooke’s posthumously published essay “On earthquakes”. In 1674 Hooke gave his opinion to the Royal Society that the Earth’s magnetic poles were rotating around the Earth’s axis, but this was accompanied by no suggestion as to how such an effect could be produced: he never theorized, as did Halley, as to what might produce a periodic rotation of the magnetic poles. For Hooke, earthquakes were an instrument for the transformative processes that he envisaged through the Earth’s geological history, whereas on Halley’s model they presented a difficulty which required accounting for. It therefore appears that not one of the highly distinctive characteristics of Halley’s model came from Hooke. Halley’s theory was original, and derived not from the lectures of Hooke but rather from the error in lunar mass of Newton’s Principia.

Grit in the Clockwork

Halley presented his discovery of the ‘secular acceleration’ of the Moon, whereby its orbit gradually alters over centuries, to the Royal Society in 1695 (28). Schaffer has pointed out that his embryonic ideas on this matter had already appeared in the 1692 paper, in the last argument there given for a hollow Earth (29). This argument concerned the viscosity of interplanetary space.

The Moon had been designed as denser than the Earth, Halley explained, not least so that it could keep up with the Earth in its journey through space. Had the two spheres been of similar density, the Moon would soon have been left behind: “the cavity I assign to the Earth may well serve to adjust its weight to the Moon. For otherwise the Earth would leave the Moon behind it and she become another primary planet.” His argument was subtly mathematical: the deceleration experienced by a planet due to the viscous drag of space would be in proportion to its cross-sectional area (radius’) but inversely as its mass (radius’); which meant that, if Earth and Moon were both of the same density, but of very different sizes, they would be differentially retarded. Earth had been designed as hollow, to avoid losing its Moon.

Book II of the Principia had demonstrated that the virtually perfect vacuum of outer space offered negligible resistance to a moving body. This was the sole issue on which Halley ever ventured to disagree with the Principia. Halley had failed in 1691 to be elected to the Savilian chair at Oxford on grounds of atheism, then associated with any belief in “the eternity of the world”. If Halley could show that the solar system was running down, from the friction of interplanetary space, then he would have evidence for a limited duration of the world. Schaffer has argued that he aimed thereby to evade the charge of atheism (30).

If there was such an ether-drag from space, it was not at once evident to Halley what effect this would have. If it caused the Moon to fall nearer to the Earth, then this would have to be accompanied by an acceleration in its orbit, not a retardation. In 1693, Halley published a paper suggesting that mediaeval eclipses were occurring slightly later in time than would have been expected (31). Halley saw in these temporal displacements evidence for his theory that the Moon was accelerating in its monthly orbit and was gradually drawing nearer to the Earth. His discovery came to be called ‘secular acceleration’. In 1694, Newton told him that the Earth’s mass was increasing due to such things as the tails of comets falling upon it, from which Halley found support for his view of the Moon as being pulled ever closer to the Earth, and thereby accelerated (32).

It was a century-and-a-half before astronomers realized that the converse was the case: the Moon is in fact decelerating in its monthly orbit as it gradually recedes from Earth (33). Halley’s final argument over the Earth/Moon density needs to be seen within this context: as part of his quest for the grit in the cosmic clockwork whereby he could avoid the charge of asserting “the eternity of the world”.

Halley’s essay was popular, and frequently reprinted, appearing several times in abridged editions of the Philosophical transactions. The fourth edition of his essay appeared in 1732, the fifth posthumously in 1749 and a later edition in 1819 (34). It was reprinted in vol. i of Miscellanea curiosa, consisting of the “most valuable” discourses read and delivered to the Royal Society, which passed through several editions between 1705 and 1726.

In later life, when Savilian Professor of Geometry at Oxford, Halley together with much of north-west Europe witnessed an extraordinary aurora borealis display, on 6 March 1716, visible even in the daytime. Halley was requested to compose a commentary upon this strange phenomenon for the Royal Society’s journal. Halley had never before witnessed an aurora, in his sixty years as an astronomer (35). After discussing certain magnetic aspects to this phenomenon, he suggested that it might be due to inherently luminous matter inside the Earth emerging through fissures in the North Pole. This substance, he explained, would “transude through and penetrate the Cortex of our Earth” and then spread through the atmosphere as the aurora. He could explain why the luminous vapour would only “transude” in the polar region (36). It was because, as Newton had shown, the Earth was a flattened sphere, and so its shell would therefore be thinnest at the poles. Halley’s portrait at 80 years of age as Astronomer Royal in 1736 shows him holding a diagram of the hollow Earth.


Whiston’s Astronomical lectures of 1715 endorsed Newton’s ultra-dense Moon, citing its mean density as 1.8 times that of the Earth (37). This was the value Newton had published in 1687, suggesting that Whiston had not perused that part of the Principia’s second edition in which this value was revised down­wards. Whiston then left his readers mystified as to how the Moon could have come by such a high density, but his Astronomical principles of religion of 1717 supplied an answer (38). Whiston there explained that the “total Cavity of the Central Regions” of the Earth could well account for the density ratio, and referred to Halley’s paper of the previous year. Whiston found scriptural corroboration (as Halley had not) for these lower regions being inhabited.
Last Edit: 07 Aug 2013 00:41 by chandrakavi.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Hollow Earth 07 Aug 2013 00:43 #15

  • chandrakavi
  • chandrakavi's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Underground Researcher
  • Posts: 651
  • Likes received: 263
PFIZIPFEI wrote:
EDMOND HALLEY
Last Edit: 07 Aug 2013 08:35 by chandrakavi.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Hollow Earth 08 Aug 2013 01:36 #16

  • chandrakavi
  • chandrakavi's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Underground Researcher
  • Posts: 651
  • Likes received: 263
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: cantata

Hollow Earth 09 Aug 2013 20:48 #17

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7961
What do you think about the hollow world theory, Chandra?
Can you imagine we are living inside a spheric world?
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Hollow Earth 10 Aug 2013 04:57 #18

  • chandrakavi
  • chandrakavi's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Underground Researcher
  • Posts: 651
  • Likes received: 263
PFIZIPFEI wrote:
What do you think about the hollow world theory, Chandra?
Can you imagine we are living inside a spheric world?

No, I don't agree with Plato on that one,
If there is a Hollow Earth, it's below us, we're not in it.
One must remember that in Plato's times people thought the earth was flat,
So although mistaken ,as I see it, he even gave hints that the Earth was round, quite advanced for his times.

But this concept of the Hollow Earth, has been around in all cultures, in holy books, in Legends, fictions,
In India in the Mahabarata.

The Nazis sent Three expeditions, they must have believed there was something in this and took it seriously.

Later Admiral Richard E.Byrd, representing the USA Government,flew to the poles and with his entire crew of men inside the Hollow Earth,
Gave a lot of interviews, worldwide to the press, until the Pentagon told him to bury the story.

The secretary of the Navy, Forrester decided to go public on the Hollow Earth,( he the same as Richard E. Byrd was a Freemason)

But Forrester "fell" from the window of a very Highrise building, and it was said then, that he had committed "suicide",
which nobofy truly believed. Of course he was pushed so he would not go public.
After this Admiral Byrd and his men realized their lives were at stake, so they decided to mainten this as secret.
But Admiral Byrd left us his Secret Diary.

So I believe of a strong posibility of a Hollow Earth, but we still have to get there, We live in the surface
If someone has the means to get there it's the US Navy, or some other countries,
But it's obvious they don't want to do it.

Jules Verne, a Freemason, had some true information when he wrote JOURNEY TO THE CENTER OF THE EARTH,
So he must have taken that truth and made it a novel. If you think about it Almost all of Verne's novels have become realities,
The submarine, and so on, so I think perhaps he had inside information, that we don't.

If they revealed that the Earth is Hollow, perhaps on one hand people would feel insecure, other more adventurous type of people
Would want to go there, politicians would lose control over the population, and they would no longer be needed as today, so they continue
Talking of this as a fantasy, so people will see it as a good movie, a good story, far away from reality.

I hope we are still alive on this Planet, to see this reality PFIZIPFEI.

I Am from Chile, the Antatica is close by in my Country, I never understand what different Chilean Presidents go to do
In those cold temperatures, there must be something to it. Below us, not above us.

There is a lot of UFO talk together with hollow Earth, but I Am not into that.

I hope I can take my girlfriend for a weekend to a nice place inside hollow Earth and enjoy life. :rofl:

:D
Last Edit: 10 Aug 2013 05:47 by chandrakavi.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: cantata, PFIZIPFEI

Hollow Earth 10 Aug 2013 05:39 #19

  • chandrakavi
  • chandrakavi's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Underground Researcher
  • Posts: 651
  • Likes received: 263
Here is an interesting video made by the Russian military,
Talks about Admial Byrd, UFO, Hollow Earth , the Antartica, Nazis, quite interesting documentary.




25/09/2012 -
Third Reich - Operation UFO (Nazi Base In Antarctica) Complete ... Russian documentary ...
Last Edit: 10 Aug 2013 05:41 by chandrakavi.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: cantata, PFIZIPFEI

Hollow Earth 10 Aug 2013 22:23 #20

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7961
As much as I appreciate your contributions, Chandra, I need to refrain from commenting here and ask you to try to understand my motivations:

truth-zone.net/forum/Vent-Room/60531-newspeak.html?start=20#77414
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: chandrakavi
Moderators: novum, rodin, Flare
Powered by Kunena Forum

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it. Secure transactions via paypal.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2019 - May 2020, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 263 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 239 - Raised
( £ 185 GBP )
donation thermometer
70%
Updated
27th February 2020

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.