TOPIC: Is The White Species Superior?

Negros have more of what are called "quick reflex muscle cells." This gives them a slight edge in sports. Negros also scar more heavily. Not being a doctor, I can't say if this is an advantage or not. Negros also have longer arms and legs. They also have narrower hips. For the females, this may be due to having babies with smaller heads. Negros also have a slightly different overall shape to their torso. Some may view these things as being advantageous.

Negros are also prone to diseases that don't effect Whites. Or as badly. There are also drugs that work on Whites that don't work on blacks. Or as well. Negros also have a few less grams of brain than Whites. I wouldn't consider these things to be advantageous. No doubt there are other less desireable traits to blacks that I don't know about. Because even talking about the subject is usually frowned upon. No doubt it has in part been responsible for my getting banned from the forums I have been banned from.

Next, as I pointed out in a reply to someone, there isn't a negro populated and run country on the planet that is worth a damn. That is despite the "monkey see, monkey do" example set for them by developed countries. Also, over 95% of the time that I see a negro male out in public with a female, it is a white female.

To that point, I would like to bring in some trusted hearsay. My cousin is a musician. We lived in the same house for many years. He told me of a black guy he knew who often went to see the band he played in. My cousin always saw the black guy he knew with white girls. One time my cousin asked him, "Why is it I never see you with any black girls." The black guy's response was, "What would I want one of those ugly things for." Though as far as I'm concerned, all negros are butt freaken ugly.

Also, I see many black women and other non-white women who try to look White. Many negro women also straighten their hair or wear wigs with straighter hair. Even Michael Jackson tried to make himself look white. (And don't give me any crap about him having a skin pigmentation disorder, or I will crush it) Given these things, it's no wonder negros become enraged when White people call them nig-gers. (Even though blacks use the word to each other all the time) Obviously it is because of aesthetic jealousy.

Another example of the attractiveness of being White is the white makeup that Geshas wear. Actors in times past also used to wear white makeup to help their facial features stand out. In times past, Europeans were also known to wear white wigs for beauty. Women in times past also used to wear white makeup for beauty. Another thing is that tanning aside, I bet that more women use makeup to lighten their facial features rather than to darken them.

Also, women with brown eyes sometimes use blue eye contact lenses to make their brown eyes blue. I doubt if any blue eyed woman ever used brown contact lenses to make their blue eyes appear to be brown. Another thing is that when it comes to making a drastic change to their hair color, bruinet women are more likely to go blond rather than blond women deciding to go bruinet.

Another example of White attractiveness concers something I saw once on a documentary about the Vietnam war. For a time, women there spent a lot of money to get their eyes surgically done to look more "Western." They said that the money they spent was either more than the value of the countries yearly gross domestic product or greater than the vlaue of the countries yearly exports. I don't remember.

So when it comes to these things and more, only a severely brainwashed white person would say that Whites aren't superior. As to what non-whites think, who cares.

As I have previously stated.
If everyone is lined up with the most Negro of person at one end, in accordance with dna and feature presentation, right through to the most Caucasian of whiteness, so that there would be one line of the worlds population going from extreme black to extreme white.

Then if a random person was selected to decide where on this line Negro ended and Caucasian began, if this random was to chose the person by placing their hand on the shoulder of the person who was at the end of Negro and the beginning of Caucasian in the line, the people standing either side of the chosen one, would be so similar that it would make no odds, the same would apply no matter who was chosen.

Only the two people at either end of the line would be excluded, and we can't have two races of one can we?

That's the truth, thus nobody needs to be impaled to support your fantasy cult.

Whites run the the Crystal Meth industry. CAn you past the drug test white power boy? Do you even answer the basic question of the origin of your avatars salute?

what about spray tans and people why lay in the sun to get darker.

novum wrote: Yeah, I've done that as to warm the joints & ligaments to boot!

Once people come to realize one or two points they can stop all their ''race'' nonsense

Point 1) There has never been a recorded instance of anyone of pure ''race'' such as negro or Caucasian or any such category.
Point 2) There are no defines, IE how dark is a negro, how curly is their hair, or flat is their nose, etc...? There are no ''race'' characteristics that have particular dimensions, the same goes for a Caucasian, how white is their skin, how pink are their lips, how think/thin are their lips, what are the dimensions of each characteristic? There are no rules, no regulations, only that one lies somewhere between different forms of human expression, it always reminds me of this guy.

Blue Tackler,
I have seen this sort of thing before. They can't argue against what I say, so they descend into incoherent babble. But feel free to try again. Though this time, try to stick to the points I made in my thread. In the meantime, I will say that DNA doesn't have a lot to do with anything. Whites are Whites and negros are negros. You don't need a DNA test to tell the difference. That isn't fantasy. It is fact. Also, at one time Europeans could apparently sucessfully interbreed with Neanderthals. And they were REALLY different. Another thing is that you should be thankful that I'm not able to upload pictures and add them to this post. Because I could show you some differences in skull shapes between different species of human that you would find difficult to say are the same.

^ subjective clap trap, no facts pure cult.

There is a place where Negroes and Caucasians meet on the dna scale, and even in the characteristic exchange scale, that is the place where no race exists, what you describe is the outer regions, I've seen all the skull shapes etc...before.

When you learn to think a little wider you will see, of course if we compare the most negroids with the most Caucasians there will be a difference, you buffoon.

If you want to concentrate on the extremes then you will find what you seek, though as I say there is no ''pure race'' we're all a little bit of this, a little bit of that, what you complain about is how much of this or that that we are.

We're all mongrels get used to it.

You say you want to discuss things without censorship and with reality.

The reality is that the Caucasian and Negro ''races'' meet, the places where traits are exchanged IE you have a bit of negro in you, and negroes have a bit of you in them. it's a continuum, there are no defining segments or cut off points in the human race where different categories start and end, what you appear to do is look at the black and the white and ignore the entire conjoining sector.

wiikkidd,
What the hell does meth have to do with anything. Besides, from what I hear, most meth or the chemicals used to make it come from Mexico. But stop trying to change the subject Jew boy. If you think anythin I said was wrong, speak it. Or shut up. Also, I did answer the question about the Nazi salute. I said it didn't matter. It's just a salute. Anything that anybody did was probably done by somebody else in the past. Big deal. Also, Germany was capable of some amazing engineering. The things they made were due to using things like lathes and calipers. A Nazi salute wouldn't have had any effect on anything they were manufacturing.

No real NS would ever start at thread with such a dumb ADL bait headline!
Only hasbara agent provocateurs seem to love to expose themselves in such a blatant way.





You are really desperate ...

novum,
If you remember, I did bring up tanning in my thread. Do you remember what I said about it? Though if you want, I can say more. First, it was only until recent times that tanning became popular. In times past, it was frowned upon. Because it marked you as a lowlife laborer who worked out in the sun. Also, ever see anything on TV or in the movies about tanning? I bet you have. But keep in mind that those are insturments of Jewish propaganda. Also, many beach resorts try to attract tourists. Do you think that they might promote tanning? And what of those who make tanning machines or run tanning salons. Do you suppose that they might have a reason besides beauty to do what they do? Such as money? As for myself, the Whiter a girl is, the better I like it.

I also have one instance out of zillions to show you the opposite of the tanning thing. Decades ago, there used to be a fairly well known Jewish entertainer named Dinah Shore. Later in her career, when I was a kid, she used to have a talk show on TV. I saw pictures of her as a child. She had fairly dark skin and black hair. Along with a Jewish nose. As an adult entertainer, she had blond hair, lighter skin and apparently had a nose job done. I bet she would have stayed a mile away from any beach or tanning lamp.

AB love cook ups as much as 13 if not more.

Lots of pseudoeph, bunsen burners and pyrex in the kitchens.

Blue Tackler,
A little less nonsense here. But still nonsense. Every other creature on the planet is "racist." What part of that don't you get. Only the human parasite tries to say differently. That is because they have been brainwashed by slave lovers and sand negro Jews and have had their empathy turned against them as a weapon. Such as with the Stockholm Syndrome. Even babies have been found to be "bigoted." Why? Because it is the right way to be.

Next, you are right about there being no "pure" race. For example, all people from what I hear have some Neanderthal DNA in them. But that isn't the point. The point is that there are Whites, negros, Orientals, Natives of the Western Hemisphere, etc. Whites just happen to be the most attractive.

Then you revert back into gibberish. The point is that if you can see a difference between different species of human, then there are differences. As for negro hair, have you ever seen any kind of wild animal that has the same kind of hair? I havent. Also, the lice that plague White and others with similar hair evolved to grasp onto that kind of hair. Then look at the pubic louse. What most people refer to as crabs. They evolved to hold onto pubic hair. With that kind of hair basically being on a negros entire body, could it be that they evolved on negros? Could be!

Another thing is that the freakishly huge lips that most negros have is repugnant to me. As are the wide flat monkey like noses most have. Next, I have my preferences. But despite what you say, there is a definition for beauty. It is a mathamatical definition. It is called 'The Golden Number." It is 1.618.

Blue Tackler,
Along with a whole lot more nonsensical gibberish, you admit to there being differences between races. But you basically say that it doesn't matter. That makes you the buffoon. Then you go off on that "pure race" crap again. But I already went into all of that. Apparently your brainwashing is deeper than I can cut into.

pfizipfei,
I hope you were wearing your dunce cap when you wrote this. First of all, my political leanings just happen to be more toward National Socialism. That is as real as it gets or needs to be. So don't tell me what a National Socialist would or wouldn't do. Maybe if you were one yourself, you would have a little right to comment on the matter. As for the name calling and accusations, is that the best you can do?

Here is the point. It is the only thing that matters. In my thread, I said a number of things. Your job, if you choose to accept it, is to tell me if anything I wrote is wrong and why it is wrong. If I am desperate for anything, I am desperate for you to try.

cultsmasher wrote:

cultsmasher wrote:
So desperate to set the bait, and like a wind up spider waiting for a fly to hit the web you have woven.

Do you seriously think that changing avatar and account name conceals who you are?

novum wrote:
Who lit the fuse?...........Cultsmasher aka Guy Fawksenstein or Aunty Lynn?........Who else is in the Plot?
Don't worry.......it's a dud!...........

Cultsmasher wrote


No they are not, in fact the only species on the planet that has ''races'' is humans.

If it was simply blacks, whites, etc... then yes they would be separate breeds (not races), but it's not that, this is where you are bending the truth and making shit up, and omitting the rest.

White people have often different visual characteristics to blacks, even if the dna is ignored, and many blacks have what are commonly known as white characteristics.

Here is a picture of Haile Selassie, as you can see, other than his skin pigment (which is in fact related to altitude and Vitamin intake) his basic features straight nose etc, are quite Caucasian.

This is the man who many blacks admire, The main man that is worshiped in the Rasta religion.

This is just one obvious example of trait sharing, many blacks have what is considered to be white features and vice versa.

The areas where trait sharing occurs in the human expression continuum is far greater than where it does not occur, in fact there is nowhere it does not occur. Unfortunately for your pov, humans are a trait sharing species, get over it.

Btw I'd be grateful if you can link me to an example of someone who is of pure ''race'' I'd like to see an example, I mean someone who has no dna from any other ''race'' ?

Once you realize no such person exists, you realize the foundation for your pov is an illusion.

Exorcist,
That goes for you too moron. If you think you can refute anything I said in this thread, or in any of my other threads, go for it. Otherwise, piss off.