TOPIC: (Exerpted due to abuse) Fighting Racism - Implementing Multiculturalism

bombshock.com/anarchy/class_war.html

And there we have the half truthers, in their bubble created by the ruling class.

bombshock.com/anarchy/class_war.html

Anyway, that's enough about the Far Left, maybe certain posters might now comprehend what it really is....which is nothing to do with most of the criticism that gets shoved at it. It's not in a position to do anything but have some small demonstrations, and try to appeal to working class people across the board to untie against their controlling parasites, whether or not any of them are Jewish is irrelevant, the message is not to be selective but to unite against all the elites and the system. Presently the system has the working class fragmented, it's playing right into their hands by wasting energy fighting amongst itself.

And this is what you think is pressed on the mass media etc etc....wake up it's a million miles from what gets aired on the BBC or Channel 4 and the rest of it. The mass media is there to keep you pacified in your place and find shit to argue about with other working class people, or even the Middle Classes, BLM and all the rest of it is just a way to keep our heads down, Soros doesn't care about black people, he cares about maintaining the Status Quo, he's not a Far Leftists, he's the absolute opposite, he's a Capitalist elitist manipulating the situation just like the rest of them. Getting folk riled up about ethnicity issues or fascism and whatnot, keeps us all in our place.

Your inverted rubbish means nothing to me. what is it about that which you fail to understand? Antifa are by their very own actions, and by their own admission, an anti-white militant group. So you aint selling no turd to me. Rat boy.

Any organisation who is openly against ordinary white people (Like so many on the radical left now clearly are), or who is against white people simply wanting to exist in peace inside their own countries, is no friend of mine, and is ultimately only aiding a abetting the true enemy of mankind.

Antifa are not Far Left, they're anti Fascist. In other words if Fascism doesn't exist then neither does Antifa, but the Far Left concept of Class War exists regardless of Antifa or Fascism.

That shit that goes down with 'fascists and antifa, it's silly skirmishs about social niggles, the Far Left would rather they stopped all that nonsense and directed their energy at the elites.

You're stuck in an ethnicity paradigm bubble, it's where the elites have you, they've even got you convinced that the Far Left is represented by the mass media.

You've shown today how clueless you really are.

You fail to comprehend that the Far Left are not as opposed to the Far Right, as they are opposed to Capitalism and the ruling Class.

Sword And Hammer wrote:
Simple ...
The means of production must be in the hands of workers.
The ruling class must be deposed.
The obscenely rich must have the vast majority of their wealth taken and used for the common good.
(They can live out their lives in ONE of their homes, with enough to live out their lives in relative comfort.)

WTF is a Revleft faggot?

Now you're just outright trolling. Frothy. I think you know very well what I'm talking about.

When all else fails, just deny and repeat the same lie over and over, gaslighting anybody who see's straight through the scam. Just like you do with the 6 million deal. It's a typical tactic of the anti-white radical left and their fake corporate mass media. That's exactly whet you're doing. Trying to deny the fact that the mass media and the radical left are essentially now both part of the same caucus, with practically the same interests. The radical left IS the new establishment, all but in name or economic socialist policy, anyhow.

The ideology these Antifa creeps follow is totally embedded, and sanctioned, by the system they think or claim they're all fighting against. Hence why the fake media only ever makes concerned Nationalist types into the bad guy, and never these Antifa thugs. When was the last time you heard the likes of the BBC report on violent militant anti-white groups? Even if and when they do, it's always to spin the narrative in their favour, because of some bogus perceived and contrived ''white racism.''

I don't expect the average Joe or somebody like you to understand or acknowledge that, but hey ho, one can only try and educate the ignorant and the blind. Or in your case somebody who wishes to see others remain blind and ignorant to the real situation.

At least any neutrals reading will give it some thought, which is why I'm taking the time to respond to your nonsense, and not to try and get you to admit you're wrong. I already know that's an exercise in futility, in your case.

From the Liberals, Social Democrats, Green Parties to the radical AntiFa, RAF, Black Block, etc. They are all one

bd wrote:

Revleft is an international communist forum on the internet.

I'm a moderate socialist, I think workers should have more rights, trade unions, access to education, access to healthcare, and better wages also. Where I disagree however with communism is its insistence on internationalism, abolition of the ruling class, and its multiracial multicultural cultural marxism.

Workers should have a shared stake in their employment where they share that with business owners themselves through the rule of law.

Yes, the obscenely rich are a problem and should be dealt with but you're never going to get rid of economic classes altogether. Instead there needs to be a balance between business owners and workers in a form of compromise on both sides engineered by the state.

Frothy wrote:
Yes, there is a difference between neo liberalism and communism however things are becoming confusing because neo liberals are leaning more towards the radical left of communism every year.

Neo liberal centrists are becoming a thing of the past increasingly. They're rare anymore and I suspect this will increase overtime.

How about we cut the shit and go to this thread. Any sane person knows that fighting multiculturalism and implementing specism is the way to go. After all, non-whites aren't flooding into White countries because White people are doing things wrong. Or that things are being done right in the countries they come from. The problem is if any White people out there are willing to do anything more than just bitch and complain.

Zorro wrote:
Any thread that supports multiculturalism and fighting racism is a gaywad thread. Also, do you not see that having a thread that says "implementing multiculturalism" and "fighting racism" would of course be supporting the cause of mass migration? (invasion) Not showing the flaws in it? Another thing is that just because the person who started a thread with such a disgusting and treasonous title is no longer around is no reason to remove my reply to it from the thread.

You didn't read the thread, did you. The premise of the thread is very much against multiculturalism. Again you jump to premature conclusions. Or are you trying to play dumb while being deliberately disruptive?

How is it you rarely ever contribute anything positive to other members threads here, instead you just start your own threads with very similar titles to already long existing threads, almost as if you're doing it to try and debase some of the topics or threads which already exist here, by association?

Yes, I think that's exactly your strategy and game plan here.

Zorro wrote:
What kind of asshole would start a thread saying "Implementing multiculturalism, fighting racism" when what they really meant was "Implementing racism, fighting multiculturalism." I tried to set things right with my own thread along those lines. But you didn't allow it. Next, I do say things in other people's threads. But if I feel that their beginning premise is flawed, I will start a thread of my own that begins with the correct premise. It isn't as though I can change their thread. Neither would I want to. I have things of my own to say. So I will say them. For example, you have threads about the holocaust fraud. I have things of my own to say about it. In my own way. If I ever decide to start such a thread, will you let it stand? Or bury it in another thread. Though maybe you will just shitcan it to the vent room.

Then fucking well try and debate subjects without doing your utmost best to try and come across as a total psycho, or as a mass serial killer or something, or as the next Anders Breivik. Otherwise you'll just find yourself going about the forum with somebodies boot stuck up your backside. Mine.

Zorro wrote:
I have many threads around here. If you think that anything is wrong in any of them, just let me know what it is and why you think that. And the same goes for being "psycho." If I said anything anywhere that you think is "psycho," you just let me know what that is and why. I can fix that quickly enough. I assure you.

Sword And Hammer wrote:
Yeah sure it's confusing.

Look at it like this, these Lefties. PC brigade, Hilary Clinton supporters, etc etc, and not the Far Left no matter how Zorro and other disinformation idiots pretend otherwise. It's the same as when those moderate Left liberal types describe FOX NEWS as 'Far Right, as if the presenters are wearing Gestapo uniforms. It's just silly shit.

The Far Left are anti Capitalist, They're not Antifa or the mass media, they're not represented on or by the mass media, the mass media is not 'Far Left it's Capitalist by it's very concept, it's why it's full of advertising, means of funding, and is active on the financial market.

To dismiss everything anti Right as the Far left is idiotic, but then again with idiots like Rocco and Zorro.. what else could one expect.

Yes I know people can easily get the terms mixed up, but they know they do and alter the terms they use when it's explained, it can happen to anyone, the fact that those two goons carry on regardless just shows that they are purposefully spreading disinformation. The Far Left is anti establishment, insomuch as it wants to level the playing field, pretty much how Rocco says he wants his anarchist Utopia to be, yet he's against them, because he incorrectly thinks and won;t change his mind that the Far Left is the middle Left mass media etc etc.

It's a waste of time engaging with that pair of idiots. Zorro pretends that the Far Left are anti White and that Soros of all people represents the concept, the boy's either insane or a compulsive liar.

steamroller wrote:
Oh behave, there are dozens of examples here where you've gone waaay overboard and over the top. Posts which I have been forced to moderate or outright delete. Other member's have also witnessed it. You damn well know it too, so stop trying to play silly games with me or wasting my time here having to check through your posts to make sure you're not going off on one about cutting peoples faces off and sticking them to walls, or hanging blacks etc etc.

Look, if you can't express yourself without coming across like you are Dr. Hannibal Lecter or something, then you're just going to have be made history here, because you're taking up too much of my valuable time having to check through your posts. Which means it gives me less time on the forum doing what i would like to do.

If you continue to waste my own time in this way, then I'll see to it that you're made history from here for good. i simply haven't got the time to waste on somebody like you.

Frothy wrote:

Well the confusion is on both sides one could argue.

Neo liberals view anybody not neo liberal as being far right these days which is silly because there are many different kinds of conservatives where we're not unified on everything where there are many different ranging perceptions.

You have very lightweight conservatives like that of civic nationalists and then you have more extreme heavyweight conservatives like Rocco's unregulated capitalistic libertarians. [Cosmopolitan civic nationalism might be the last of conservative moderate centrism that is left standing but it is a dying belief system as it is practically being abandoned by everybody on the right currently.]

Then you have national socialists like me that are somewhere in the middle of both conservatism and the leftwing where we sort of incorporate both systems. Fascists does this also along with national socialists.

Where fascists and national socialists disagree is the extent of how socialist an economy should be and national socialism tends to be more ethnocentric where fascism does not necessarily have to be but can.

It's the same for left-wing ideologies also where not all leftists are unified on everything either in that there are differing ranging perceptions on things although it could be argued that all of the left wing is becoming more and more marxist in its thinking which is where conservative accusations of communism derives.

I suppose here in the United States the difference may be that conservatives are making a big push hard right and the left wing is making a push hard left where in that regard everybody is making pushes for radical agendas through opposite directions in that moderate centrists is practically unheard of anymore from both sides.

For me discussing left or right politics I look at it this way, from the right you have republicans, libertarians, anarcho capitalists, fascists, national socialists, and supporters of monarchy.

Notice that national socialists and fascists are the only two non capitalist ideologies of the right. I sometimes wonder if fascism and national socialism should be classified in their own categories as being somewhere in the middle.

From the left you have neo liberal democrats, democratic socialists, anarcho communists, and state communists.

As far as I know only neo liberal democrats are the ones pursuing capitalism because all the other leftwing train of thought is pursuing socialism and in this way one could argue the democratic socialists are being easily co opted by communists. The ranks of communism is always filled with ex democratic socialists especially the anti nationalism variety.

The right is composed mostly of nationalists and the left is comprised of internationalists. That's where we all are at the moment.

Feel free to add onto my list if you can think of something I missed.

I've got nothing to add to your list, as I already said some idiots describe FOX NEWS as 'Far Right' but it's not, it's Right, but not Faaaaaar Right.

The Far Right splits between those who want to be Goose marching the Jews out of town, and those who are simply hard line Capitalists,

Arguably Rocco is both versions, so to him mass media will appear Far Left due to his vantage point. If one sees the mass media as Far Left what it really translates to is they are viewing it from the Far Right.

The Far Left is anti Capitalist, they want to have social revolution, they want to attack Capitalism, they want the Far Right and everyone else in the lower socioeconomic class to stop blaming or fighting with one another and pull all their shit together to attack the upper class/elites/controlling classes, who are sitting pretty and living off our labour.

They don't like to see working class people being attacked, even if they are Jews. Muslims, Blacks, as well as whites, they're not doing anything to cause this 'white genocide' they're not in a position to. If they were in a powerful position they'd be de-wealthing the rich and stopping exploitation.

What we have with Conservatism is economic Conservatism which is what the Far Left are against, and social Conservatism such as maintaining culture and lifestyles, that's that part with the Far Right element that yells about immigration.

I guess it's to do with priority, the priority of the Far Right is immigration control etc, with the Far Left it's defeating the elites.

So who has us pinned down, the immigrants or the elites? I guess it's the elites, they control the economy and the need for immigration. So it's arguable that the Far Right could support the Far Left to get rid of the elites, and as a consequence immigration may well diminish.

Presently we have man against woman, black against white, and lot of other social squabbles, if that's being controlled by the mass media you can bet your ass it's not Far Left.

My advice for anyone looking for the Far Left or Far Right, is to first position yourself in the centre which is a small degree Right of most of the mass media, instead of looking at it from either a Far Left or Far Right vantage point. Then one will see the mass media is maintaining the status quo which is divide and conquer tactic that the Far Right and everyone along the way as far as the Far Left participate in, and are submissive to.

it's why so many posters here who like to think they're (((red pilled))) aren't, they're actually doing exactly what the mass media want them to.