TOPIC: The Lies of Christopher Bjerknes
The Lies of Christopher Bjerknes 06 Mar 2020 19:18 #1
The Lies of Christopher Bjerknes
March 5, 2020 Doug Thomas
Many of you may be aware of Adam Green’s anti-Zionist media outlet “KnowMoreNews”. For the past year Adam has been hosting a supposed “anti-Zionist” activist named Christopher Jon Bjerknes. His content spans the realms of criticizing Einstein as a Jewish supremacist and Putin as a Zionist puppet, etc., which are all, in themselves, reasonable and true things.
And that is the problem. Bjerknes, after having gained everyone’s trust with factual and legitimate criticism of Jewish power, then begins giving the poison pill, or what is known as the 80% 20% formula. That is to say, 80% truth and 20% disinformation and lies.
Bjerknes is now on his second book (of which their shall be III volumes) entitled “Adolf Hitler, Bolshevik and Zionist” in which he makes the accusation that Hitler was a secret controlled opposition agent working for the Zionists.
Adam Green has hosted Bjerknes on his show multiple times to discuss his ridiculous book, with a fair amount of push-back from Adam’s audience. Sadly, Adam Green, apparently having a very rudimentary grasp of WWII, is simply believing every word Bjerknes says without questioning him once.
The multitude of lies and distortions in Bjerknes’ two books is staggering, and would truly take a series of articles to begin addressing every lie outlined in his books. But for the sake of this article, we will take the overall premise of Bjerknes’ book series on Adolf Hitler and show how it is an outrageous fabrication. The premise of the books can be broken down as follows;
1) Hitler was funded by “Zionist” bankers and put into power.
2) Hitler was a secret agent of the Zionist-Bolshevik conspiracy with the mission of starting a war he would allegedly lose on purpose so Communism could spread.
3) Hitler’s final mission was to establish the state of Israel by forcing the Jews to leave Europe for Palestine.
Addressing the first point, Bjerknes takes the tired, old and well known myth that “Jewish bankers funded Hitler”. This is the bread and butter of every shill.
An accurate assessment of these lies can first be traced back to 1929, first used by Walter Stennes and Gregor Strasser, who were traitors against Hitler and launched a coup against him; they began reciting a lie that the Jewish Warburg family gave money to Hitler. Interestingly enough, the evidence for this is non-existent and appears to be pure propaganda. In James Pools’ “Who Financed Hitler”, this myth was assessed as a complete fabrication. This was the same conclusion drawn by Yale scholar Henry Ashby Turner, who actually had access to West and East German archives and found no trace of this alleged cash transfer. Mr Turner did, however, find great evidence that a few German steel and coal companies donated to the NSDAP, but this is not the international, speculative “Zionist banker” capitol that Bjerknes insists was behind Hitler. An even more damning assessment of the Warburg myth is the fact that it originated from a book entitled “Hitler’s Secret Backers” allegedly written by “Sydney Warburg”, which as it turns out is a pen-name, and no Sydney Warburg ever existed. So, it is unknown who actually wrote the book, as the author is anonymous. This book, which contains zero receipts or hard evidence, and was ghost written by an unknown author, is also the primary source Anthony Sutton used to write his book “Wall St. And The Rise of Hitler”.
Furthermore, I.G. Farben, often cited as the multinational corporation “funding Hitler,” which was another accusation from Bjerknes, was cited in Poole’s book as having NEVER sent money to the NSDAP, but instead I.G. Farben donated to all of Hitler’s opposition parties instead!
What Poole and Turner both concluded in their books was that the NSDAP thrived mainly on membership fees and literature sales. Truth be damned to Bjerknes. The following quote is from the economist Paul Drucker:
"The really decisive backing came from sections of the lower middle classes, the farmers, and working class… As far as the Nazi Party is concerned there is good reason to believe that at least three-quarters of its funds, even after 1930, came from the weekly dues…. And from the entrance fees to the mass meetings from which members of the upper classes were always conspicuously absent.”
The second point we will debunk is even more absurd than the first. It is hard to believe Bjerknes is actually serious with this one. To state it simply, Bjerknes claims Hitler was in on an alleged conspiracy to start a war with the Soviet Union, which he would then LOSE ON PURPOSE, with the apparent goal of helping “spread communism through Europe”. To begin refuting this laughably absurd claim, one can simply ask, if that were true, then why didn’t the Zionist elites just allow the crumbling post-WW I Weimar Germany to continue collapsing? There was already communist revolution in the streets of Germany, small Soviet republics being set up inside Bavaria, etc. If this was allowed to continue unabated, the entirety of Germany would have become communist and absorbed into the USSR rather quickly. Why the need to raise Germany up with the alleged “puppet Hitler” only to bring it back down again? It simply makes no logical sense.
Furthermore, on the accusation that he planned to lose a war with the Soviet Union, the mental gymnastics required to explain this is mind bending. I will give a few examples of events that occurred that must have been planned for in advance in order for Bjerknes’ theory to add up. The first being the Italian invasions of Greece and North Africa, both of which delayed Operation Barbarossa because the Germans had to send reinforcements to bail out the Italians. Did Hitler know about and plan for Mussolini to lose two campaigns? Or how about the Japanese-German agreement that the Japanese would eventually declare war on the Soviet Union, but subsequently fail to do so? Did Hitler know the Japanese would fail to follow through with their end of the plan? What about the Prague Manifesto and the Russian Liberation Army where tens of thousands of ethnic Russians joined the German Wehrmacht to help fight their Communist oppressors? Why would Hitler set up such a thing if his goal was to intentionally lose the war? And finally, the most absolutely unexplainable and damning bit of evidence against Bjerknes theory is the unusually early and harsh winter of 1941. Did Hitler know winter would come early in Russia that year and stall his forces? In fact, according to historical sources the winter of 1941-42 is known as the coldest European winter of the 20th Century. The temperature was much below normal from the beginning of January until the end of March 1942. Apparently, Hitler was a psychic weather forecaster and knew this was going to happen! Absurd!
(Below: ethnic Russian volunteers in the Russian Liberation Army under command of the German Wehrmacht, an estimated 50,000 strong corp that Hitler recruited inside Russia to fight the Communists to apparently help him lose the war on purpose. If Hitler wanted to lose the war against the Communists on purpose, why would he even bother doing this?)
There are so many other examples one can use to pick apart Bjerknes’ claims on that topic, but for the sake of time we will move onto the final point that Hitler allegedly “helped create Israel”. This is yet another favorite myth used by shills and gatekeepers. Bjerknes’ strategy on this lie is two-pronged, first that Hitler would “scare” the Jews out of Europe, and then set up an agreement with the Zionists to ship Jews to Palestine.
First of all, what is NOT mentioned by Bjerknes, or others who spread this lie, is the fact that Hitler and Alfred Rosenberg did not consider Palestine as their first choice, but instead Madagascar! The only reason this deal did not come through is because the British and French had territorial hold over Madagascar and did not allow Hitler to transfer the Jews there. Right away, we see that Hitler is not operating on some supposed “script” to help create Israel. Secondly, the Transfer Agreement was STOPPED by Hitler in 1939. Why would he do that? Third, the German foreign office had no plans for a “sovereign Jewish state” in their own writings!
Mark Weber of the Institute for Historical Review lays this out quite clearly in an article titled “Zionism and the Third Reich”:
" […] German support for Zionism was not unlimited. Government and Party officials were very mindful of the continuing campaign by powerful Jewish communities in the United States, Britain and other countries to mobilize “their” governments and fellow citizens against Germany. As long as world Jewry remained implacably hostile toward National Socialist Germany, and as long as the great majority of Jews around the world showed little eagerness to resettle in the Zionist “promised land,” a sovereign Jewish state in Palestine would not really “solve” the international Jewish question. Instead, German officials reasoned, it would immeasurably strengthen this dangerous anti-German campaign. German backing for Zionism was therefore limited to support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine under British control, not a sovereign Jewish state.
A Jewish state in Palestine, the Foreign Minister informed diplomats in June 1937, would not be in Germany’s interest because it would not be able to absorb all Jews around the world, but would only serve as an additional power base for international Jewry, in much the same way as Moscow served as a base for international Communism. Reflecting something of a shift in official policy, the German press expressed much greater sympathy in 1937 for Palestinian Arab resistance to Zionist ambitions, at a time when tension and conflict between Jews and Arabs in Palestine was sharply increasing.
A Foreign Office circular bulletin of June 22, 1937, cautioned that in spite of support for Jewish settlement in Palestine, “it would nevertheless be a mistake to assume that Germany supports the formation of a state structure in Palestine under some form of Jewish control. In view of the anti-German agitation of international Jewry, Germany cannot agree that the formation of a Palestine Jewish state would help the peaceful development of the nations of the world.” “The proclamation of a Jewish state or a Jewish-administrated Palestine,” warned an internal memorandum by the Jewish affairs section of the SS, “would create for Germany a new enemy, one that would have a deep influence on developments in the Near East.” Another SS agency predicted that a Jewish state “would work to bring special minority protection to Jews in every country, therefore giving legal protection to the exploitation activity of world Jewry.” In January 1939, Hitler’s new Foreign Minister, Joachim von Ribbentrop, likewise warned in another circular bulletin that “Germany must regard the formation of a Jewish state as dangerous” because it “would bring an international increase in power to world Jewry.”
Bjerknes and other gatekeepers fail to mention two things in regards to the Transfer Agreement. 1) The Germans wanted it under joint British/Palestinian control, NOT a sovereign Jewish state. 2) Adolf Hitler met with the Grand Mufti of Palestine, Amin Al Husseini, to begin negotiations of weapons shipments to the Palestinians in an effort to balance the power between the British and Palestine, and later to even sabotage the British/Zionist influence under Operation Atlas. Supposed “Anti-Zionist” activists like Bjerknes and Adam Green will need to find some sort of explanation as to why Hitler was arming and supporting the Palestinians if he was allegedly this stooge/puppet helping set up Israel. But instead, like all shills, they will just never mention it.
“Hitler was not “the founder of Israel” and in no way supported the establishment of an independent Jewish state in Palestine as many continue to claim. Hitler and National Socialist Germany were destroyed to pave the way for the establishment of Israel. Blaming Hitler and National Socialist Germany for something the Jews were determined to do on their own – with the assistance of their puppets in the West – is a gross distortion of history.”
Bjerknes likes to reference the Theodor Herzl quote in which he claims they will “use” anti-semites to liquidate Jewish wealth and push the Jews hard enough to establish their own homeland, thus fulfilling the Zionist prophecy. However, what is not mentioned is that Hitler did not “liquidate” their wealth, he allowed the Jews to keep their wealth so long as they just left Germany, and those who did not want to leave willingly and ended up in labor camps were treated very civilized, as observed by the Red Cross observation missions to the camps before WW II broke out, a far-cry from the “violent persecution” that the Zionists envisioned to “scare the Jews”. Very few Jews actually left to Palestine under the Transfer Agreement, about 2% of Europe’s Jewish population did so; the rest preferred to immigrate to the United States or Britain.
Another huge red flag in Bjerknes’ thesis is that he apparently believes the holocaust happened, as he has never once came out on record and empirically deemed it a lie and Zionist propaganda. According to his absurd thesis, Hitler was simultaneously “holocausting 6 million Jews” AND shipping them to Palestine at the same time! I guess in his logic, the “holocaust” happened to scare the rest of the Jews to immigrating to Palestine. As you see, his narrative is so schizophrenic and nonsensical it barely even makes sense. Needless to say, advanced researchers are well aware that the holocaust is a post-war propaganda piece, nothing more. The only thing surprising about this is that Adam Green never challenges him on the holocaust story. Bjerknes gets a free pass to lie incessantly on Adam’s show.
A final and important angle to consider, that does not in any way, shape or form fit Bjerknes’ “Hitler was a Zionist stooge” narrative is Hitler’s attacks against the Rothschild family. This is hardly covered by Bjerknes (most shills avoid this topic like the plague). Not only did Hitler have Louis de Rothschild arrested and held for ransom, but Elizabeth de Rothschild after having been arrested, was imprisoned at Ravensbruck concentration camp where she subsequently died of typhus. Not to mention the list of Rothschild palaces and banks that were seized and looted. Why is this important? Because the Rothschilds are, for all intents and purposes, the FOUNDERS of Israel. It was the Rothschilds who created the Balfour Declaration and began setting in motion the eventual establishment of Israel.
As stated above, if Bjerknes and Adam Green wish to paint Hitler as a “stooge of the Zionists” they will need to find an explanation as to why Hitler was attacking the founding family of Israel, while supposedly “working for them”.
Bjerknes’ lies will unfortunately continue to be spread, and well meaning anti-Zionist researchers may very well get taken for a ride by him. It is important that Bjerknes’ lies are put in check for the sake of other middle of the road researchers. Perhaps at this point, it is a fair question to ask why Bjerknes’ books are allowed on Amazon, while David Irving’s and Mike King’s books are banned off Amazon? Or for that matter, how has Adam Green survived several rounds of YouTube purges?
James Poole- “Who financed Hitler?”
-Institute for Historical Review -“Zionism and The Third Reich”
John Friend- “Was Hitler a Zionist stooge?”
CODOH – “The demystification of the birth and funding of the NSDAP”
CODOH – “The Myth of Big Business/Nazi Axis”.
"Freedom is not a measure of good, but good is the measure of freedom." - Bishop Williamson
The Lies of Christopher Bjerknes 21 Mar 2020 12:39 #2
liberabo te ab inferno
875 020 079
He cried in a whisper at some image, at some vision—he cried out twice, a cry that was no more than a breath: "'The horror!
|Topic subject||Relevance||Date of latest post|
|Christopher Jon Bjerknes||15.24||Wednesday, 24 February 2016|
|Live Debate Dennis Wise vs Christopher Jon Bjerknes||14.59||Wednesday, 18 March 2020|
|9/11 Christopher Bollyn||7.37||Thursday, 01 March 2018|
|Christopher Bollyn on 911 latest US tour (ended March 2015)||6.98||Sunday, 15 March 2015|
|New Lies for Old||6.19||Monday, 24 July 2017|
|6.000.000 LIES||6.19||Wednesday, 12 June 2019|
|What Lies Upstream.||6.12||Saturday, 11 August 2018|
|Lies We Believe About Crying||6.12||Friday, 09 November 2012|
|LIES WE BELIEVE ABOUT FEELINGS||6.12||Friday, 09 November 2012|
|Media lies||6.12||Thursday, 17 January 2019|