TOPIC: Ayn Rand’s Cult Cannot Stand Racial Scrutiny
Ayn Rand’s Cult Cannot Stand Racial Scrutiny 13 Apr 2020 02:16 #1
Ayn Rand’s Cult Cannot Stand Racial Scrutiny
July 25, 2018 Lorenz Kraus
This piece is meant for young people who might get caught up in Ayn Rand’s cult. It gives them what they need to get out of it.
Usually, when someone issues an open letter, they want feedback to open-up a dialogue on an issue. They don’t light a fire cracker and run away, like a coward. They don’t ban comments. That’s not true of intellectual perverts, like Objectivists, who can’t sanction the truth.
The disingenuous cult of Objectivism has a wide-open weakness. A cult is a malevolent religious circle that consumes its members.
Ayn Rand’s Jewish rabbinical cult cannot stand racial scrutiny. Race is the central normative concept in philosophy. Race conditions art, politics, and religion. Art beatifies the race, politics husbands the race, and religion sacrifices racial enemies; just as Christianity sacrifices Gentiles to their Jewish enemies.
Objectivism claims to uphold the facts of reality, but rejects the facts of race.
Ancient Greece was congruent society; each element served the other.
The current pontiff of Atheistic Zionism, Craig Biddle, issued an “open letter” to advocates of identity politics, presuming that racialists do not know what they advocate, and that by highlighting what National Socialists said on race, aimed to shame racialists, using guilt by association. Racialists are not intimidated by comparisons drawn between themselves and National Socialism.
The post-war period has validated Hitler’s racialist philosophy. Everyone can see the historic mass rape invasion of sex-starved refugees into Germany, displaced by wars for Israel. Worthless NATO does nothing to stop it. Hitler wanted Fortress Europe. The SS would have stopped it. Ethnic groups embrace ideas that have survival value. If they don’t, they die out.
Objectivists welcome mass rape. “It is not a function of the government to prevent foreigners from coming into this country as they wish.” One would think that would be one of the primary functions of government; to repel mass invasion and thoroughly destroy those fomenting it. Jews are maggots on dead races; races that have shirked the call of duty to racial self-preservation.
Ayn Rand affirms Rosenberg’s statement that, “The Jew will view the same world in a different way from the German.”
The Jew is devoid of the concepts duty and honor. As such, the Jew will produce a Jewish philosophy. Rand’s is one such case.
Objectivism is the philosophy of WHITE GENOCIDE.
Racial Theory of History
Reflection on the causes of the world wars shows that Hitler was right. Jews CAUSE communism. Jews cause modern art. Jews cause open borders. Jews will use Islam to destroy Europeans. Jews hate European civilization and the people who created it.
To stop (Jewish) nihilism or communism, you must arrest Jews.
The worst event in modern European history was the emancipation of the Jews.
Without the emancipation of the vengeance-driven Jews, none of the horrors of the 20th Century could have taken place. Jews understand that to destroy the West, they must destroy the blood of Europe. The SS vowed to assure the existence of the Germanic people by protecting the blood. The SS is a necessity in a world of Nordic-hating Jews. The mixed-raced Jews hate Nordics for their racial purity. Jews hate all pure races. The Jew is a mixed-race descendant of ancient temple prostitutes. The Jew is a parasite on human impulse. Racial purity offends the Jew. Sexual propriety offends the Jew. To destroy our purity, the Jew promotes nihilism.
Ideas are moved by the groups they serve.
Jews transmitted their nihilism from Europe to America. Jews are the transmission belts of nihilism because Jews need nihilism to plunder healthy Gentile nations.
This is racial history short and sweet. Ethnic group interests are the key factor in history. Those who lead those interests are the main characters of history, which is why Hitler is an iconic figure.
Objectivists evade all this and blame Kant for communism and National Socialism, as if racial conflicts don’t exist in nature; as if defending yourself against communism (Jewish slavery) is wrong and morally equivalent to fighting it off.
Race is the alternative cause to modern nihilism, namely, the Jewish use of nihilism to deconstruct and destroy Gentile society.
When Jews were proximate to communism, Freudianism, modern art, sexual liberation, political radicalism, pornography, drugs, and open borders, Kant was nowhere in sight.
Even if Kant had a nihilistic philosophy, it took Jews to weaponize Kant; to make use of skepticism, for their own bitter ends of cultural critique. The cause of the demise of the West shifts to the Jews. They had the motive, means, and opportunity to cut off the blood supply to our civilization and choke our racial soul. Civilization is the permanent expression of values conducive to racial development. Jews worked to crush Europe’s racial development by pitting Europeans against themselves and their best interests. Civilization rides the racial tides. Emacipation brought collapse.
Parasitical Jews embraced communism because communism is the slavery of mankind to Jews. Germans embraced National Socialism because it arrested Jews bringing slavery and death to Germany. The revolting Objectivist fails to appreciate this fact. Hitler and National Socialism acted out of self-preservation. That is exculpatory. Hitler did nothing wrong.
Leonard Peikoff believes America should nuke Iran for a fatwa on Solomon Rushdie. What, then, do Jews deserve for bringing slavery and death to Germany, and Gentiles, generally? What does justice demand?
There is no mystery to Hitler, or how he came to power. Racial interests explain his rise succinctly and intuitively. This is what Jews don’t want the world to know and why the lies and deceptions of Objectivism serve the Jews. You can’t spend ten years of your life trying to figure out Hitler, read his work, and not concede him some ground. Jews were proximate to all the evils that arose in the 20th Century. Kant was long dead.
Objectivists morally equate communism with the Germanic resistance to communism, reducing both to the faux pas of “statism.”
That is how a moral imbecile buries truth and justice to the detriment of our race.
If Ayn Rand is wrong on race, she is wrong on every normative question. (She is wrong on epistemology, as well.)
Philosophic Significance of Race
Objectivists are simply irrational Jew-servile hypocrites who can’t even follow their philosophy.
Objectivists don’t respect the facts of reality, namely, the philosophic significance of race; their objective is to bury race because Objectivism is anti-white. It does what serves the Jews.
That is why Objectivists reject historical reflection upon new information and cling to wartime propaganda. Their philosophy is staked on Auschwitz. Auschwitz was Jewish reform school with the best wartime amenities.
Race has philosophic significance because race affects all men. Men act on behalf of their race out of biological necessity, or else their race dies. They need to know that. A philosophy that hides this issue is genocidal.
In Objectivism, evasion is the root of all evil. As such, Objectivism is evil. Objectivism is evil because it evades the philosophic significance of race.
[Race] is the notion of ascribing moral, social or political significance to a man’s genetic lineage—the notion that a man’s intellectual and characterological traits are produced and transmitted by his internal body chemistry. Which means, in practice, that a man is to be judged, not by his own character and actions, but by the characters and actions of a collective of ancestors. (Ayn Rand Lexicon “racism”)
One must ascribe significance to race, if one hopes to reproduce one’s race; just as the horse breeder must ascribe significance to a horse over a donkey, if he wants a winning horse. This is Biology 101.
Objectivists say Ayn Rand is a world-historical genius. No. Just a hysterical Jew who is afraid of white awakening.
Racism claims that the content of a man’s mind (not his cognitive apparatus, but its content) is inherited; that a man’s convictions, values and character are determined before he is born, by physical factors beyond his control. This is the caveman’s version of the doctrine of innate ideas—or of inherited knowledge. (Ayn Rand Lexicon “racism”)
Ayn Rand doesn’t cite anyone for his claim. We are men and have human limits. One’s brain limits what you can understand; your body limits what you can do. Objectivism pretends man has no limits, no corporal limits, which is the religion of Satanism.
Objectivism counts on outliers to validate its grand claims concerning all human nature.
A genius is a genius, regardless of the number of morons who belong to the same race—and a moron is a moron, regardless of the number of geniuses who share his racial origin. (Ayn Rand Lexicon “racism”)
That’s not philosophy.
A black or Jewish genius breeding with a Nordic blonde does not produce a Nordic genius. A black genius must uplift his own race. A Jew cannot be allowed refuge among Gentile betters. Ayn Rand’s philosophy is not a philosophy designed with Europeans in mind from the European perspective, but from a Jew fleeing communist Jews of Russia. That Ayn Rand evaded the cause of communism shows that she was hiding the cause of communism to protect Jews, and deceive Gentiles. So much for Ayn Rand being an “anti-communist.”
National Socialism solved the individualist versus collectivist dichotomy. You can do whatever you want, as long as, it serves the Volk. That is a beautiful resolution that has survival value. Those who stab the Volk in the back have no standing.
Ayn Rand’s War on Ethnicity
“Ethnicity is not a valid consideration, morally or politically, and does not endow anyone with any special rights.” (Ayn Rand Lexicon “ethnicity”)
Ethnicity” is an anti-concept, used as a disguise for the word “racism”—and it has no clearly definable meaning.
Ethnicity does not exist.
“Give every help possible to Israel.” Ayn Rand at LewRockwell.com
Suddenly, it exists for Jews.
This is Jewish ethno-centrism at its finest, which includes, Jewish self-deception, the inability to see obvious hypocrisy.
Ayn Rand’s False View of Race
Objectivism has a false view of race, claiming that racialists hold that race transmits innate ideas.
She provides no citation for her view of what “racism” is. This is her own concoction.
Racialists are more apt to say that just as an elephant uses its nose to feel out the world, just as a bird flies about to explore its world, the races have their own talents and limits that tend to give rise to a racial-soul, through which they express and engage the world.
Blacks tell us they see the world in terms of race and live in a white man’s world. They don’t like it. They want movies with their own actors. Whites go through the world like a fish through water, oblivious to race. They don’t want to be reminded of it. Whites being the majority, don’t like to think of race. If they had to think of race, they might realize they are a minority. This causes anxiety and white flight. Is that not a racial difference in outlook produced by race itself?
Just as Jews are decedents of ancient temple prostitutes who don’t know their fathers, but sought a father figure, a messiah, Europeans know their fathers, know their land. They know that blood and soil work as one.
The Jew treasures usury. The German knows his treasure is his blood and soil, his life-giving land and his life-giving blood. All the great men are in his blood, he only has to let them out. The land rejuvenates and brings forth endless new life. The blood brings forth endless new men. Blood and soil are true regenerative treasures, while usury is artificial. Usury is slavery of the productive men of the land. The Jew loves liquidity, gold and diamonds. He is ready to fleece and flee. His suitcase is packed ready to go. The land means nothing to the Jew. The German is a man of the land. He is the citizen-soldier prepared to stand his ground and defend it. He is part of the land. He feels the land. He has no thought to flee. He has nowhere else to go. His land is his heimat. The Jew will come and go. The German remains. Liquidity or land, Jew or German, blood or usury. These are real differences in outlook rooted in race; a difference in the culture and community of producers versus the parasites. We hinge on authentic versus artificial forms of regeneration. Are we with or against blood and soil? The Faustian soul finds boundless meaning in boundless generations to come. The Jew lacks sentiment. These are psycho-racial differences that spawn differences in culture and philosophy.
Ayn Rand’s War on Duty and Honor
Honor is the reward for doing one’s duty to the race. We say, he who does his duty is a good man. Jews demonize duty, as if it were, “mindless.”
Ayn Rand’s Jewish castigation of duty affirms Rosenberg’s quote most fittingly, “The Jew will view the same world in a different way from the German.”
This is true in the Judeo-Objectivist view of sex as a money transaction, trading “value for value,” orgasm for orgasm, logged on a spreadsheet tit for tat. To the European, unpolluted by Jewish mentality, sex is for reproduction, and reproduction aims for the life of the race. One aims for good breeding, strong and healthy children. The orgasm-seeking Judeo-Objectivist has no mind for this.
We saw that Ayn Rand invented her own twisted view of racialism, but by this, she ruins the related the concept of duty, which connects to honor. Jews have no concept of honor. Duty is the work of racial preservation. A race-hating Jew hates duty, too.
This is the most embarrassing issue in Objectivism.
Why should a mother give her baby milk?
The Otard answers that it is in the mother self-interest to do so because the baby makes the mother happy…because values make people happy. Per Rand’s trader principle, the baby gets milk, in return for, making the mother happy…at two in the morning? This is not compelling.
The law is what is best for the race. The members of the race must do what is best for their race, or else their race dies out. Members must do their duty. Duty is nature’s calling. When the baby cries, it is the call of the race, the call of duty. Duty is kin-serving action. Duty is the work the race needs done. Duty has survival value. We do our duty, not for money, but for the life of the race. Duty is sacred. Regarding duty as sacred has survival value. We take nature’s point of view on this because we must serve nature to survive. Duty is “mindless,” only in that, we aren’t hung up on thoughts that draw us away from duty. We put those thoughts aside because certain things have to get done. There is no room for distraction.
Isn’t that more compelling, compelling because it is intuitive? Warts and all, that’s how life is.
Ayn Rand demonized duty, when she could have understood and honored it. Duty has a biological basis. This does not need a philosophic justification, but rather simple acknowledgement. Feeding a baby is done on the obvious fact of it. This is intuitive. Only to an Otard is feeding a baby a philosophic dilemma that needs justification; and until we have that justification, a baby will not survive.
Generations of mothers into the stone-age fed their babies without philosophic justification. Objectivism adds nothing to this, except to, undermine race and nature. Whatever caused mothers to feed their children must be obvious, positive to our species. It can’t require a philosophical argument, critique, or hesitation. There’s no time for that.
We are a product of duty. We do our duty to preserve and produce posterity. This is even more compelling, if we reincarnate into posterity. We are posterity. To feed the baby is to feed ourselves. How about that for “rational selfishness”?
Does the best of the race have a duty to reproduce? The question answers itself. Women should sperm up on the best sperm. Rejects should get out of the way. Do we have a duty to be concerned with posterity and to our racial bonds across the world? It serves the race to do so. Nature’s calling speaks the meaning of life. The meaning of life is found in duty, in species survival, the most important work there is. If that work isn’t done, all is lost.
Objectivism has disparaged motherhood from the beginning, which is why like the Quakers, Objectivism will die out.
The species can’t survive on men whose life’s aim is to stand atop their cubicle crying out, “I’m king of the world!”
The work of the race must be done. It was done for you to exist. Pass it on.
Duty is necessary to our existence. To turn it into a philosophic issue, to overly reflect on it, or to twist duty inside out and damn it, is genocidal. We should understand duty, not destroy it. To destroy duty is to destroy mankind. Man cannot survive on atomized selfishness, but on collective selfishness, i.e., racialism. That is intuitive to the birds and the bees.
The concept of duty frees us from other problems. For example, just as men have a duty to fight to preserve the nation from invasion, retards have a duty to die, so that strong children can live. They have a duty to do their duty, and only in this way can they have honor that transcends and redeems their condition. It’s not a big issue. It’s duty. The meaning of our lives can be found in our contribution to our nation, the blood, the Volk. That is the only thing that lasts over the eons, not capitalism or communism.
Jewish genius Ayn Rand calls duty, “one of the most destructive anti-concepts in the history of moral philosophy.”
How many children could survive infancy on the morality of Objectivism?
Ayn Rand says, duty is the “moral necessity to perform certain actions for no reason other than obedience to some higher authority.”
She never thinks to ground duty in nature; nature, which is, the ultimate authority on what survives.
Objectivist morality has no survival value to the species, and thus, has no long-term function for any race, which is why any race that adopts Objectivism is sure to fall apart. “Morality” is just a stratagem to talk people out of their racial duty; which is why virtue-signaling the death of one’s race is madness.
Honor is the fulfillment of duty, as in, an honorable mother or an honorable soldier. The Aryan gains honor through his devotion to excellence in man, method, and race. The Aryan lives for honor, so that his race may live.
This is incomprehensible to the Jew, just as Objectivism is incomprehensible to the mother feeding her baby.
Rand Affirms Rosenberg
Since the Jew exists outside our national blood, the Jew has no concept of duty. Ayn Rand proves this. Her mind is foreign to us, just as ours, is foreign to hers. This is a difference in racial soul; a difference reflected in the philosophy Rand produced.
Ayn Rand’s pig-headed Jewish castigation of duty and race affirms Rosenberg’s quote, “The Jew will view the same world in a different way from the German.”
The Jew produces a Jewish philosophy. Ayn Rand is no exception.
It makes sense that a Jew would reject race and decry our sacred duty to our race. If we do our duty we can defeat the Jew. Duty is our secret weapon. What Jew would want Gentiles to do their duty? We see Ayn Rand kicking and screaming against duty in Gentile society.
Isn’t it interesting that Objectivism has become a disgusting vehicle for Atheistic Zionism and little else? What else could it have become?
Unfortunately, Objectivists present a national security threat, infiltrating their cult into schools and colleges to cuck Europeans out of their genuine interests and serve the interests of their enemies in Israel, and spread the mental illness of de-racination, which is a public health threat. Young people need to know the flaw in this philosophy, why it is a cult, and why it is destructive.
There’s a tree in Atlas Shrugged that turns to dust. When you take race out of philosophy, philosophy turns to dust. That’s what Objectivism means for our civilization. Racial cowardice is the fall of man. Craig Biddle is one such coward.
"Freedom is not a measure of good, but good is the measure of freedom." - Bishop Williamson
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
|Topic subject||Relevance||Date of latest post|
|The Daily Nationalist: Inter-Racial Adoption||7.34||Friday, 29 May 2020|
|Ayn Rand’s most important contribution to mankind||7.21||Tuesday, 23 February 2021|
|Racial, Cultural, And Ethnic Partitioning Of European Or Western Nations.||7.19||Sunday, 16 September 2018|
|Falsified rant lacking any content against philosopher Rand||7.05||Tuesday, 06 November 2018|
|Trump sending Rand Paul to Iran on diplomatic mission||6.98||Thursday, 18 July 2019|
|ATLAS SHRIEKED: AYN RAND’S FIRST LOVE AND MENTOR WAS A SADISTIC SERIAL KILLER WHO DISMEMBERED LITTLE GIRLS||6.76||Tuesday, 27 April 2021|
|Nicolaas van Rensburg - Prophecies - SA Boers & Imperial Germans - South African Racial Civil War Imminent Planned Purge of White Population in SA||6.62||Saturday, 08 July 2017|
|Your 5 Favorite stand-up comedians||6.62||Thursday, 08 January 2015|
|Will the real Jeremy Corbyn please Stand Up!||6.55||Tuesday, 05 March 2019|
|What Leftists Stand For - American Thinker||6.55||Tuesday, 26 February 2019|