TOPIC: Sonic Geometry - The Language of Frequency & Form

I AM ALL I AM wrote:
Oh do fuck off.
Really.
Just fuck off.
At what point did your life become so empty that peddling this drivel seemed to become important?
Sonic Geometry my erse.
Sonic the Hedgehog fair enough, but the rest of that crap.
Honestly, give yourself a break bro.
Nobody is buying.

Those feet in picture 1 above.
Congenital syphilis for sure.
May be an idea to get that checked out if those are yours.

GMP wrote:
G'day GMP.

Is that meant to be "arse"?

It would be correct. Your arse is Sonic Geometry.

LOL.
You'll do for me Bruce.
'Sonic Geometry' as a form of flatulence I deffo agree with.
Get those feet checked out BTW- if those are yours.
Tertiary syphilis can be a killer but secondary symptoms are easily treated.
A simple blood test will tell.

GMP wrote:
G'day GMP.

Be careful, that was almost a positive response.

Princess wrote:

German New Medicine - Ryke Geerd Hamer truth-zone.net/forum/the-medical-establishment/65637-german-new-medicine-ryke-geerd-hamer.html

I AM ALL I AM wrote:
I actually thought you were, with this new age crap...

Time is measured only according to human-defined subdivisions.

There are 4 main time defining observations:
- the rotation of the Earth - producing days of ~24 "hours" (just a subdivision)
- the orbit of the Earth around the Sun - a year
- the sidereal month - Moon w.r.t. background stars
- the sinodic month - full Moon to full Moon cycle

So the Earth itself, the Sun and the Moon essentially. All the rest is invented to make sense out of it all.

If you are actually addressing a topic on this and this is your math, I fear very much for the rest. It is a factor 2 off. And not even exactly 8640 minutes.

Nobody knows the diameter of the Sun and anyone who says he does, lies.

How does that work? The Sun rotates in 24 hours? No; it's the Earth that rotates, but that doesn't change or divide the diameter of the Sun in two. The diameter always stays "the same" (not really, because of solar flares and the fusion that is supposed to happen; it is not a solid).

No? The Mayans and other pre-Columbian cultures were in some aspects more advanced in their time conscience than us now. Many people don't even know anything about celestial mechanics and take their "knowledge" from shills like you appear to be, I am open to be convinced of the contrary, but my expectations are low.

Yes, so? That 60 is just a number. You could divide it by 72, or 18, or the "holy" pre-Columbian number 20 (referring to all fingers and toes) and you get another number. What does this mean? Nothing.

Yes, using 12 as suddenly a magic number. Why not 13? 24? 30.422941? A year is not 12 months, not sinodic and not sidereal months. Just Gregorian months, which is just a human subdivision.

A "fifth", yes of course, because you choose 60 that is 5 * 12.

The diameter of the Moon is ALSO unknown and "miles" (just like you did with the Sun) is just a unit. If you use kilometres, yards or iPhone lengths it doesn't add up anymore.

Quite thick for someone juggling some numbers and trying to impress people with it.

Look at Gaia coming over all rational now he's on slightly familiar ground. Tbh, I'm surprised you didn't counter the OP by quoting The Matrix.

Gaia wrote:
G'day Gaia.


Gaia wrote:
Yes, time is a man-made concept ... and?

Gaia wrote:
Actually, it is 86,400 SECONDS in a day.

43,200 for day
43,200 for night

No excuse, though I was typing from memory.

Gaia wrote:
Really?

"Radius, diameter & circumference

The sun is nearly a perfect sphere. Its equatorial diameter and its polar diameter differ by only 6.2 miles (10 km). The mean radius of the sun is 432,450 miles (696,000 kilometers), which makes its diameter about 864,938 miles (1.392 million km). You could line up 109 Earths across the face of the sun. The sun's circumference is about 2,713,406 miles (4,366,813 km)."
www.space.com/17001-how-big-is-the-sun-size-of-the-sun.html

Gaia wrote:
What are you going on about?

43,200 seconds for day hours
43,200 seconds for night hours

Gaia wrote:
Thank you for the offer, though it isn't my intent to "convince" you of anything. Believe what you will.

Gaia wrote:
Did you actually watch the video?

Or even read the thread in context?

Why 60 is already presented.

Gaia wrote:
Again, the reason is presented. Because you fail to recognise the reason you respond in a condescending manner.

Gaia wrote:
Really?

432 is one fifth of 2,160. In other words/symbols ...

5 x 432 = 2,160

So please explain what 60 has to do with that?

Gaia wrote:
As you state it for you shall it be. After all, it is your self-expression.

Thank you for your response to this thread.

ragnarok wrote:
G'day Ragnarok.

So "rational" is 'tongue-in-cheek', right?

His "rational" makes Alex Jones seem mainstream.

ragnarok wrote:
G'day Ragnarok.

Does that mean the Unholy Trinity is Jones - Icke - Gaia???

As a non-believer in Unholy Trinities of any sort, it has never crossed my mind, but now you mention it, he would make a useful wildcard to add to the Angry Cop/Hippy Cop routine.

I AM ALL I AM wrote:
So there is no "magic" symbolism in there. The days are 24.xyz hours long, the months are 27.2xyz and 28.5xyz days long and a year is 365.24xyz days long. Nothing precisely the other. Humans have divided those into 12s and 60s but that is just a way to make sense of it. Doesn't have any meaning.
Gaia wrote:
No, because:
- those numbers are not as exact as you present now
- only where the Sun is in zenith (today somewhere at 18 degrees latitude N or so, the day and night are the same length. All other parts of the Earth have longer days than nights or the inverse

Yes, really. The explanation of how r, d and circumference are related is maths, nothing about the Sun. These numbers are all just ideas, nobody KNOWS how big the Sun is. And that you refer to the liars of Space.com says a lot.

False (see above).

Your story on the first page and reactions to others do not really convince me that you do not try to convince people...

Which video?

60 is just a number. Nothing more, nothing less.


You choose this 12 and 60, not me. Why just those two numbers remains a mystery.
Yes, really. We can only estimate the apparent diameter (and thus radius and by assuming a sphere the circumferences) of the Moon. The rest is ideas, not carved in Moon rock.

Yes, I can do the math. What does it mean? Nothing.

You choose a number (25,920) and you choose to divide by 60 and by 12. And then you claim "how perfect" it is that the one is 5 times the other. Yes, of course, if you choose 12 and 60. If you would choose 10 and 90 you get the "magical number" 9.

No, it's your expression. I just observe it.



G'day, I am what I am.

That's my major beef with any numerological bollocks. If you're that way inclined you can get numbers to do anything.

ragnarok wrote:
G'day Ragnarok.

Actually, I would love to see you do that, get them to anything.

Gaia is absolutely ignorant and spouting that ignorance as if it is fertiliser looking to grow something.

The 12 & 60 are explained in the video ... 12 knuckles on the four fingers of one hand multiplied by the five digits on the other hand.

Of course, Gaia will keep repeating that they are random numbers with no meaning. To the ignorant, hieroglyphs have no meaning. Are we expected to accept instruction from the ignorant about what hieroglyphs mean?

And if not for hieroglyph, why for numbers?

Of course, ignorance, as does misery, loves company, so the ignorant will attempt to convince you so that you remain ignorant with them.

Actually, here is another reason why 12 ...

You can fit 12 spheres around 1 centre sphere, all touching the centre 1.

The 12 & 1 theme occur throughout literature ...
'Jesus' and his 12 disciples
Bilbo and the 12 dwarves
... so, ancient stories and contemporary ones.

The 12 astrological star signs.

There are others, yet how many do you require to see what is in front of you?