Your donations are appreciated and help keep this site running. Even the smallest amount helps.
Thankyou

 
PROMOTE YOUR SITE
HERE
Only $3 USD/month
TRUTHSPOON.COM
The man they can't recruit!
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: The Nuclear Reactor Hoax

The Nuclear Reactor Hoax 01 Feb 2017 01:12 #1

As the reality of faked atom bombs starts to permeate the pubic consciousness and after ten+ years of surviving it's most ardent detractors I have noticed a lack of consistency in the theories put forth by those trying to sort out the sister hoax, fake commercially-viable nuclear energy production. From the comments received over the decade since I first elaborated this idea it seems many need to see these plants as producing something no matter how minimal.

In response to this lack of consistency allow me to elaborate once more my ideas on this subject matter.

A dump load is nothing more than a resistor (heating element) that is used for dumping surplus energy to prevent overload damage.
Demand for electricity varies in accordance with peak periods. When demand drops the surplus energy is directed to a dump load where it is used or boiled off in the case of the fake nuclear reactors.

Most power plants producing electricity were designed and built at a time before the advent of the energy efficiency initiatives and technical innovations. A time of convection ovens, radio vacuum tubes, filament lighting and other such inefficient domestic appliances and industry.
The energy efficiency efforts and innovations that followed were so successful that the big utils wound up with embarrasingly huge energy surpluses. A strategy would be required to dispose of this surplus energy production as much to stabilize the distribution grid as to hide this surplus before the public starts demanding lower rates.

Enter the massive kettle-like dump loads that would become known as commercially-viable nuclear energy production plants.

As we were able to observe in 911 where a billion dollar demolition job was converted into a major insurance fraud and costs and cleanup were downloaded to the public via a staged terrorist attack, the big utils and their tribal affiliates downloaded this need to hide surpluses and dispose of it by disguising the whole dumping situation and making it look like an exotic energy production method involving dangerous fissionable materials. These world-class grifters and con men and women sold the public a multi-million dollar kettle-type boiler for billions of dollars each.
A major hit to the public treasuries and the hard working public's pockebook.

Lawyers, specialists, environmentalists and other smaller parasites feeding off this windfall of money obtained under false pretenses.
Shrouded in national security protocols thanks to the involvement of non-existant fissionable materials said to be an integral part of it's sister atom bomb hoax. Compartmentalized to the max these fakes provided an airtight environment for the hoaxsters.

An airtight vessel of lies with one major leak, power blackouts that expose the fact that these things cannot produce a single watt of electricity on their own.

The instruments in the control room are reporting the power streaming in from the grid as power generated. The temperature in the core of these kettles is directly proportional to the energy being disposed of.

The steam pouring out of those giant stacks is just that, steam, nothing more.

All claims to radioactivity-related illness another fraudulent back door to the public treasury. The hazmat suited personnel and mult-million dollar post accident cleanup all part of this elaborate hoax. Obviously the jews have come a long way since the days of selling rags and snake oil. So powerful, in fact, that they can make the stars in the sky disappear at will and claim massive shockwaves without seismological evidence to support the claim.

If only these dump loads masquerading as nuclear energy production plants served the sole purpose of affording it's authors a major chunk of the public treasury it might not be such a big issue since for all intents and purposes nobody seems to care enough to guard the treasury against that type of dishonest exploitation. The big problem is that these scams are used as a pretext for war and mass murder. Think Iraq, Korea, Iran and the so-called Cold War.

One thing the jews do very well is instinctively milk a scam for every red penny and every drop of blood possible.
They turn a controlled demolition into terrorism, they turn x-rays into radioactivity, and they turn rockets into a multi-billion dollar deep space exploration scam clusters. Feeding our unreasonable expectations.

So, as time passes and the global populations of energy consumers grows exponentially this increased demand is progressively making these dump loads smaller and smaller but still extremely profitable.

The bottom line-- no commercially-viable nuclear energy production, no nuclear powered subs or ships, no fallout or radiation dangers, and no materials to build atomic bombs even if the concept was not so ludicrous as to defy elementary physics.

This said, and although these fake reactors pose no threat for radiation or fallout, they are, after all, high pressure containment vessels capable of violent explosions if the pressure becomes unregulated. A fact easily observable in the historical records of the Chernobyl and Three-Mile Island accidents.

The Chernobyl accident and explosion while not staged became a theatre of staged disease and malformations. These opportunistic nuclear hoaxsters collected a sordid assortment of human malformations around the globe and positioned them for photoshoots that would ultimately portray the non-nuclear suffering of these poor souls as the product of the accident at Chernobyl. If you trust the statements of people that believe the nuclear claim to be true you might be left thinking that only a nuclear accident like Chenobyl can produce human malignancies. They would have us believe that genetic malformations did not exist on earth before the Chernobyl aftermath staging.

Speaking of malformations it is important to note that of all life forms within the cordoned off perimeter surrounding the site of the Chernobyl accident not a single insect, rodent, bird malformation was observed. The jews were too busy swimming in illicitly obtained money to bother spreading their hoax radiation to the smaller creatures.
"In a time of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act"
George Orwell
Last Edit: 01 Feb 2017 01:25 by 221bBakerStreet.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Gaia

The Nuclear Reactor Hoax 01 Feb 2017 02:35 #2

  • rodin
  • rodin's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Spam Killer
  • BELIEF IS THE ENEMY OF TRUTH
  • Posts: 4858
  • Likes received: 1818
Where were these 'dump loads' before nuke power plants were built? Or in countries with no nuke stations?

A radioactive mass will generate heat, this we can see and test in a lab. Hence nuke power is in theory possible.
If I were designing a grid, regulating power output v demand would be accomplished by:

1) Production/generation variation in output. Shit down some stations during non-peak period
2) Increase off-peak consumption (economy 7)
3) Deal with transient spikes with hydro electric stations that can be switched from storage batteries (pump water uphill) to generators (turn on the the turbines)

The problem is not so much one of dumping excess power as it is one of meeting peak demand. There is a range of voltage that is tolerable. I can remember lights dimming when the ads came during Morecambe and Wise.
To understand who rules over you look to whom you tube can't criticise

The media isn't there to cover the news
It's there to cover the news up

All establishment lies pass through three stages
First, they are accepted as being self evident
Second, they are exposed by diligent research
Third, they are enforced

"Communism is the bloodiest, most difficult and the most terrible way from capitalism to capitalism" from Under the Sign of the Scorpion by Juri Lina
Last Edit: 01 Feb 2017 02:36 by rodin.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Nuclear Reactor Hoax 01 Feb 2017 03:04 #3

  • Gaia
  • Gaia's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Gold Member
  • Posts: 7469
  • Likes received: 1596
Welcome to TZ, 221BakerStreet. Are you the Canadian engineer that came with this idea long ago and I read about?

I see your point in a consistent disbelief in everything nuclear, both weaponry and power.

Still, I struggle with explaining the differences and points.

1 - not every energyproducing country has "nuclear power plants" - what does let's say Gabon or Mexico do with their excess energy?
2 - some countries are strong players in "nuclear energy", I think of France with more than 10% (20 if I recall well), what is causing those differences?
3 - as you explain it, with a simple input = output switch; what is causing the constant or at least appearing energy flow if excess energy transferred to and not from the "power plant"?
4 - how is the delivery of uranium or other radioactive minerals supposedly used as energy source arranged? Are there empty trucks coming in?
5 - what is uranium mined for if it's neither for wepons nor for energy?
6 - how is the design of those power plants possible if there is no reactor, no uranium bars, no water cooling, etc.?

The nuclear weapons have a strong argument for fakery, that is; why make it, if you can fake it. The fear of atomic bombs, a military operation with all its secrecy, top-down arrangement and impossibility for us, the general public, to check what is happening makes that part of "nuclear" clear, also the explanation of firebombs (much more horrible because of long suffering than "instantaneous vaporisation by A-bombs") as alternative makes sense.

I am open to get fully convinced that nuclear power is part of the same hoaxer crowd as bombs, but still struggle with the above questions.

Welcome again, great to read some sense from a new member.
The Only Limit is Your Own Imagination
A truth seeker is someone who dares to wade through thick series of toxic smoke screens and tries not to inhale - Gaia
"What do you call 'genius'?" "Well, seeing things others don't see. Or rather the invisible links between things."
- Vladimir Nabokov (1938)
"The silence of conspiracy. Slaughtered on the altar of apathy." - Lords of the New Church (1982)
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Nuclear Reactor Hoax 01 Feb 2017 06:58 #4

rodin wrote:
Where were these 'dump loads' before nuke power plants were built?

They were dumping via the interconnections between the grids of neighboring countries. With the import and export of electricity one cannot think of these countries as political entities but rather view them as a complex web without borders. Instantly routing energy back and forth in a vast cooperative of energy imports and exports. The energy efficiency initiatives overwhelmed the entire distribution web and not isolated sectors. In these power sharing arrangement there is no such thing as isolated.

Or in countries with no nuke stations?

Thanks to the cooperative interconnections they can consume and dump without regard to political borders.
A radioactive mass will generate heat, this we can see and test in a lab. Hence nuke power is in theory possible.

I am only questioning "commercially-viable" nuclear energy production. Energy of a sufficient volume to justify producing it large-scale.
If I were designing a grid, regulating power output v demand would be accomplished by:

1) Production/generation variation in output. Shit down some stations during non-peak period
2) Increase off-peak consumption (economy 7)
3) Deal with transient spikes with hydro electric stations that can be switched from storage batteries (pump water uphill) to generators (turn on the the turbines)

Would you design your grid allowing for nuclear plants to provide independently in power blackout scenarios?
The problem is not so much one of dumping excess power as it is one of meeting peak demand. There is a range of voltage that is tolerable. I can remember lights dimming when the ads came during Morecambe and Wise.

The major issue is not peak demand but rather the transitions between these states.

I hope this clarifies these questions for you Rodin,
"In a time of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act"
George Orwell
Last Edit: 01 Feb 2017 07:30 by 221bBakerStreet.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Nuclear Reactor Hoax 01 Feb 2017 07:25 #5

Gaia wrote:
Welcome to TZ, 221BakerStreet. Are you the Canadian engineer that came with this idea long ago and I read about?

I am Roger Desjardins the originator of these ideas back in 2004 on Libertyforum. I had touched the idea of questioning the validity of the nuclear claims before 2004 at Jeremy Sapienza's anti-state.com forum in 2001. I believe that thread was called The Atom Bomb and the State. I recall it garnered nearly 4000 page views back then.

I have also been called Alexi1111, cactus, cactusneedles, ghostwriter, Alexis, ChuckWest, Arthur, CuriousGeorge, and a few other names.
Still, I struggle with explaining the differences and points.

1 - not every energy producing country has "nuclear power plants" - what does let's say Gabon or Mexico do with their excess energy?

The simple answer, electricity without political borders.
2 - some countries are strong players in "nuclear energy", I think of France with more than 10% (20 if I recall well), what is causing those differences?

View the power grids of these countries not as politically isolated but as electrically cooperative. These distribution grids are not isolated but rather a vast interconnected cooperative that import and export electricity across Europe and beyond.
3 - as you explain it, with a simple input = output switch; what is causing the constant or at least appearing energy flow if excess energy transferred to and not from the "power plant"?

I would kindly request you rephrase that question please.
4 - how is the delivery of uranium or other radioactive minerals supposedly used as energy source arranged? Are there empty trucks coming in?

I can only say that whatever they are doing with these materials they are not going anywhere near the core of these so-called reactors.
5 - what is uranium mined for if it's neither for weapons nor for energy?

Try to sell the public on these hoaxes without mining and processing these materials. These operations are not charitable, they make lots of money and we have seen them used to expropriate landowners on eminent domain pretenses eg: the public need for electricity outweighs private interests.
6 - how is the design of those power plants possible if there is no reactor, no uranium bars, no water cooling, etc.?

There is a core and this core contains heating elements of a conventional type like those found in convection ovens and dumping electricity into them generates a lot of heat which is moderated with water.
The nuclear weapons have a strong argument for fakery, that is; why make it, if you can fake it

If they can't make it they can only fake it.
I am open to get fully convinced that nuclear power is part of the same hoaxer crowd as bombs, but still struggle with the above questions

I hope this much has given yourself and other readers a strong incentive to doubt the claims of the nuclear reactor hoaxsters.
Welcome again, great to read some sense from a new member.

Thanks Gaia
"In a time of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act"
George Orwell
Last Edit: 01 Feb 2017 09:46 by 221bBakerStreet.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Nuclear Reactor Hoax 01 Feb 2017 07:28 #6

As a passing note Mexico has a dump load masquerading as a nuclear reactor at Laguna Verde.
"In a time of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act"
George Orwell
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Related topics

Topic subjectRelevanceDate of latest post
Nuclear Bombs are a Jewish Hoax like everything else11.16Thursday, 30 January 2020
Does the Nuclear Atom exist?6Saturday, 13 May 2017
Nuclear powered missile6Tuesday, 13 March 2018
The Iran Nuclear Deal6Monday, 22 July 2019
Gorbachev Says Nuclear War is Coming6Wednesday, 12 October 2016
Israel deploys nuclear weapons in Yemen......5.87Friday, 26 June 2015
~Alleged~Swedish Nuclear Plant bombing halted.5.81Sunday, 27 March 2016
Nuclear talks show US shift from Israel on Iran5.81Sunday, 29 September 2013
Nun, 84, gets 3 years in prison for breaking in nuclear weapons complex5.81Friday, 21 February 2014
Huge Explosion at Iran Nuclear Site Not Confirmed5.81Tuesday, 12 February 2013
Moderators: novum, rodin, Flare
Powered by Kunena Forum

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it. Secure transactions via paypal.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2019 - May 2020, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 279 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 309 - Raised
( £ 254 GBP )
donation thermometer
91%
Most Recent Donation $20 USD
25th April 2020

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.