Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: Inconsistencies in EM Theory - the Kelvin Polarization Force Density Contradiction

Inconsistencies in EM Theory - the Kelvin Polarization Force Density Contradiction 05 Sep 2020 09:35 #1

  • feprinciples
  • feprinciples's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Fresh Member
  • Posts: 9
  • Likes received: 2
Here is a scientific paper that reveals an inconsistency in the official theory of electrostatics, and proves the existence of a contradiction using the standard official formulas, calculation methods, and measurements.

The paper was uploaded to several public repositories in October 2018 and was downloaded by more than a thousand times, yet no satisfactory explanation or debunking was offered till today. It is time to give it a wider exposure in the hope that electrical engineers with higher education, physicists, university/college students, professors may find it and take an interest in solving the issue.

If you have higher education in Electromagnetics and can understand the presented calculations, I am looking forward to your comments. Alternatively, if you know anybody who has the required qualifications, I would appreciate if you would forward the link to them.

A follow-up paper will be published within a few months that will offer more and deeper insights into this subject, but for now this should offer a real hard nut to crack.

Inconsistencies in EM Theory - the Kelvin Polarization Force Density Contradiction

Abstract:
Calculations of resultant electrostatic force on a charged spherical or cylindrical capacitor with two sectors of different dielectrics, based on the classical formulas of electrostatic pressure, Kelvin polarization force density, and Maxwell stress tensor predict a reactionless force that violates Newton’s 3rd law. Measurements didn’t confirm the existence of such a reactionless thrust, thus there is an apparent inconsistency in the classical EM theory that leads to wrong results.

vixra.org/abs/1810.0468
vixra.org/pdf/1810.0468v2.pdf


Zoltan
Last Edit: 05 Sep 2020 11:38 by feprinciples.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Inconsistencies in EM Theory - the Kelvin Polarization Force Density Contradiction 05 Sep 2020 10:40 #2

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 18998
  • Likes received: 8954
Interesting, thanks for posting.

Not sure we have any physicists here.

i did half a physics degree at Uni but dropped out... ive forgotten most of it now. :facepalm: :lmao: :sorry:
I remember the good old days, when 90+ year olds in nursing homes lived forever. Darn this pesky virus.

1365 = 1

1.1365 = 1,283,305,580,313,352
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: feprinciples

Inconsistencies in EM Theory - the Kelvin Polarization Force Density Contradiction 05 Sep 2020 12:47 #3

  • feprinciples
  • feprinciples's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Fresh Member
  • Posts: 9
  • Likes received: 2
novum wrote:
Interesting, thanks for posting.
Not sure we have any physicists here.
i did half a physics degree at Uni but dropped out... ive forgotten most of it now. :facepalm: :lmao: :sorry:

Your level of education is plenty enough to be able to understand the calculations and realize that the contradiction indeed exists. The fact that you have forgotten electrostatics is not a big issue. The proverb “If you don't use it, you lose it” is valid for everybody, and it is no wonder that you have forgotten a knowledge you did not use.

If you get sufficiently motivated to figure out the truth about this subject, you can easily look up the relevant chapters of your textbooks (or read them from online sources) and get up to speed very quickly. Once you have acquired the basic knowledge of higher mathematics (algebra, derivatives, integration), basic formulas of electrostatics, and methods of calculating real life problems during your formal education, these remain in your subconscious, and just a bit of review will bring them up to the surface again.

You don’t have to read the entire paper, and you don’t need to understand tensor calculus in order to understand the contradiction. It is enough if you read only the first 6 pages and understand that. The rest is there only for academics to show them that I did not ignore the other methods of calculation that were invented during the many decades to cover up the inconsistency. I have demonstrated that their cover-up equations and alternative calculation methods are faulty and unscientific.

It is a serious problem that those who are experts of this field of knowledge and pursue it as their profession don’t even want to read anything that sounds ‘anti-establishment’ due to the severe brainwashing at universities. The remainder of professionals who are still open minded enough to read the paper, and realize that the contradiction indeed exists, dare not to speak up in fear of loosing their jobs and good reputation.

On the other hand, people with open minds, truth seekers who would be willing to acknowledge the inconsistency and seek the solution are mostly not familiar enough with electrostatics to be able to understand the paper. So this is an impossible catch 21 situation, where a breakthrough in informing a sufficient number of people about this subject is nearly impossible. Without reaching a significant number of people on the other hand it is not possible to make the academy and professionals of electrical engineering to even acknowledge the existence of this problem, not to speak about finding a solution to it.

So why should you or anybody for that matter take interest in this subject? Because this contradiction has been embedded in the science for more than a 100 year now and carefully camouflaged, swept under the rag for a very good reason. Because the solution to this problem could have an effect on your life and on the lives of your progeny just like the alternating current of Tesla had.

The discovery of this contradiction was made around 2003 when I was conducting research in electrostatic thrusters. The presented calculations based entirely on the official science predicted a reactionless thrust. If this prediction would have been correct, its significance would have been enormous. It would have changed how spaceships and satellites are driven, it could have been also used to generate free energy, etc.

The fact that the predicted reactionless thrust does not exist in reality (even though the official science predicts it supposed to exist) is a bit disappointing, but the discovery still has serious consequences in another way. One of the consequences is the realization that they are hiding something, otherwise I am sure the more than 100 years should have been enough for someone to discover the issue and solve it.

The other consequence is that this discovery can still offer new solutions to global problems that were deemed impossible so far, and these will be possible exactly because the predicted reactionless thrust does not exist. :chuckle: I don’t want to go deeper into this here now, because my next follow-up paper will discuss this in great detail (ahhem... if I live that long :umm: ).
Last Edit: 05 Sep 2020 12:55 by feprinciples.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: novum

Inconsistencies in EM Theory - the Kelvin Polarization Force Density Contradiction 05 Sep 2020 22:28 #4

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 18998
  • Likes received: 8954
feprinciples, I had a friend see your post and shared with me the following......

"Saw that post about EM by that new member...they should check out Antonio Subirats/The Book of The Sun Youtube channel. He has some ideas on EM and light theory.

Yotube Channel www.youtube.com/channel/UCZb1vcqOPq2BhkRkja81NXw/videos

The best place to contact him is probably via his Patreon here www.patreon.com/antoniosubirats

It's difficult to link directly to the relevant info because it's scattered about in his videos, which tend to be long and rambling.

Afaik his new book will cover more about his ideas physics etc. He said he had finished the text, and had more illustrations to do a few months ago. Not sure when he will be releasing it though."
I remember the good old days, when 90+ year olds in nursing homes lived forever. Darn this pesky virus.

1365 = 1

1.1365 = 1,283,305,580,313,352
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Inconsistencies in EM Theory - the Kelvin Polarization Force Density Contradiction 06 Sep 2020 00:23 #5

  • feprinciples
  • feprinciples's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Fresh Member
  • Posts: 9
  • Likes received: 2
Novum, :facepalm: that freak is a flat earther disinfo agent, working for the establishment with the agenda to discredit everybody who ever dare to question the authority of official science and the absolute correctness of official scientific theories.

I have already thoroughly exposed the real agenda behind this new fad of flat earth movement here:
gab.com/feprinciples/posts/104699442055710313
gab.com/feprinciples/posts/104779882381595891

Your friend must be either completely clueless about science in general, or a disinfo agent.
My paper has nothing to do with flat earth theory and it is an insult to even relate the two (or compare me to any flat earther) in any way.
Last Edit: 06 Sep 2020 00:30 by feprinciples.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Inconsistencies in EM Theory - the Kelvin Polarization Force Density Contradiction 06 Sep 2020 01:20 #6

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 18998
  • Likes received: 8954
Fair enough, was just passing it on as my friend thought there could be a chance that something in his EM ideas could be useful. Havent looked at the info myself, the above was a cut and paste, and Im quite certain my friend isnt a disinfo agent, he just isnt inclined to post on forums anymore, but we talk via email and he saw your post..

Dont worry, nobody is paying us here... and I can acknowledge the red pill on women. :larf:

Im quite busy at the moment challenging the official covid narrative tbh, it is a very pressing issue for many of us here as its affecting our current situation immensely, so apologies for not having the time to wrap my head around and dig deeper on other things at the moment!
I remember the good old days, when 90+ year olds in nursing homes lived forever. Darn this pesky virus.

1365 = 1

1.1365 = 1,283,305,580,313,352
Last Edit: 06 Sep 2020 01:20 by novum.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Inconsistencies in EM Theory - the Kelvin Polarization Force Density Contradiction 06 Sep 2020 09:02 #7

  • feprinciples
  • feprinciples's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Fresh Member
  • Posts: 9
  • Likes received: 2
All online platforms of any significance are infested with disinfo agents, just normally they are in camouflage mode and behave like anybody else, to make them look like established and well respected people from the masses.

Their shill activity becomes obvious only when someone posts politically incorrect information that must be suppressed. A scientific discovery that needs to be suppressed is also such a 'politically incorrect' information. I have seen this manifest in several forums already. My posts about this paper used to be very effective triggers that activate the Trojan horses and initiate shill posting. It is therefore only matter of time before these spooks jump out of bushes to attack without valid arguments on most of the platforms, except on those where they think the safest for them is not to reply at all. :roll:

But their ‘flat earther’ card is not going to work in my case, because people already see through their tactics and sneaky machinations (especially when I point them out).

The information presented in this paper stands on its own, and we should discuss it as such. There is no need to relate it to any other theory, book or person with the intent to divert the attention from the topic at hand to something else, especially when that something else is a shill trap.
Last Edit: 06 Sep 2020 09:20 by feprinciples.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Inconsistencies in EM Theory - the Kelvin Polarization Force Density Contradiction 06 Sep 2020 09:13 #8

  • feprinciples
  • feprinciples's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Fresh Member
  • Posts: 9
  • Likes received: 2
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: rodin

Inconsistencies in EM Theory - the Kelvin Polarization Force Density Contradiction 06 Sep 2020 11:18 #9

  • rodin
  • rodin's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Spam Killer
  • BELIEF IS THE ENEMY OF TRUTH
  • Posts: 4862
  • Likes received: 1818
I found the original 2007 debunking of QM convincing. Haven't looked at the new videos yet re The Intermittent Electron but will.

www.scienceforums.com/topic/11645-7-reasons-to-abandon-quantum-mechanics-and-embrace-this-new-theory/

I have a feeling that this is somehow connected to the problem of 'reactionless thrust'



I had a couple of old science threads kicking around on here somewhere - used to be of the DIF also a decade or so ago.. I'll have a look...

Ah.. here..

truth-zone.net/forum/science-and-physics/64199-dimensions.html?start=0
To understand who rules over you look to whom you tube can't criticise

The media isn't there to cover the news
It's there to cover the news up

All establishment lies pass through three stages
First, they are accepted as being self evident
Second, they are exposed by diligent research
Third, they are enforced

"Communism is the bloodiest, most difficult and the most terrible way from capitalism to capitalism" from Under the Sign of the Scorpion by Juri Lina
Last Edit: 06 Sep 2020 11:26 by rodin.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Inconsistencies in EM Theory - the Kelvin Polarization Force Density Contradiction 06 Sep 2020 21:05 #10

  • feprinciples
  • feprinciples's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Fresh Member
  • Posts: 9
  • Likes received: 2
Prof. Laihtwaite did some interesting experiments, but it is still unrelated to my paper. In fact some of his claims are quite the opposite of the claims in my paper.

- He claimed that some unusual forces appear when gyroscopes are rotated or moved in specific ways, generating reactionless thrust that is not predicted by the official science of mechanics.

- In my paper the situation is completely the opposite: the calculations of forces using the official scientific formulas and methodology predict the existence of a reactionless force, which does not exist in reality. I have claimed that the predicted reactionless force does not exist, because I have measured it.

- Laihtwaite’s devices were purely mechanical, mainly gyroscopes.

- My devices are purely electrostatic, special capacitors with two different dielectrics.

I have done some measurements before 2003 based on one of Laihtwaite’s papers that predicted reactionless forces when gyroscopes were rotated, but I could not detect any such reactionless forces at all. Therefore I have dropped the idea to pursue his findings.

In those days I was still quite uninformed about the disinformation campaign perpetuated by the energy mafia. I was also quite naive back then, thinking that if I pursue the truth honestly then others would do the same. That is why I was a victim of several free energy- and thruster hoaxes.

Today after a lot of reading, research, and bad experiences I see the world quite differently with lots of disillusionment. Be aware, that whenever a researcher or inventor like Laihtwaite or Tesla discovers something that threatens the status quo (and shows it to the wrong people), the disinfo agents create fake inventions in the name of the inventor that will not work, to discredit his real invention, which gets hidden and suppressed. The same might have happened in Laihtwaite’s case, and Vajda’s case as well.

But again, please do not divert the attention in this thread to off-topic subjects. Let’s talk about the posted paper and nothing else here. If you want to discuss Laihtwaite’s inventions and multiple dimensions, you can do that in other threads.
Last Edit: 06 Sep 2020 21:06 by feprinciples.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Inconsistencies in EM Theory - the Kelvin Polarization Force Density Contradiction 06 Nov 2020 16:20 #11

  • rodin
  • rodin's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Spam Killer
  • BELIEF IS THE ENEMY OF TRUTH
  • Posts: 4862
  • Likes received: 1818
Surely a reactionless force is akin to a massless particle in its absurdity...

It would be a contradiction in terms, and in nature (ie reality) paradoxes cannot exist
To understand who rules over you look to whom you tube can't criticise

The media isn't there to cover the news
It's there to cover the news up

All establishment lies pass through three stages
First, they are accepted as being self evident
Second, they are exposed by diligent research
Third, they are enforced

"Communism is the bloodiest, most difficult and the most terrible way from capitalism to capitalism" from Under the Sign of the Scorpion by Juri Lina
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Related topics

Topic subjectRelevanceDate of latest post
Alfred Lambremont Webre | Density Shift, Chemtrails, Cyborgs7.46Saturday, 18 March 2017
HAVE MORE ENERGY: How To Increase Mitochondrial Density ( Increase Your Energy Levels / Live Longer)6.23Saturday, 09 February 2019
I sense a Disturbance in the Force5.87Friday, 27 October 2017
The People's Protection Force: How to win the information war5.8Wednesday, 14 December 2016
Blackberry wants to force popular services5.8Tuesday, 27 January 2015
The Bear is an incredible force of nature.5.8Friday, 02 August 2013
A theory5.8Thursday, 18 June 2015
karadzic-driving-force-of-ethnic-cleansing5.74Monday, 29 September 2014
Putin puts air force on alert for "war time"5.74Thursday, 09 February 2017
Cameron to force 'censorship' of porn on internet5.74Thursday, 25 July 2013
Moderators: novum, rodin, Flare
Powered by Kunena Forum

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2020 - May 2021, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 250 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 192 - Raised
( £ 140 GBP )
donation thermometer
56%
Most Recent Donation $122 USD
4th January 2021
Bitcoin Address: bc1q0kazqya0nurfxtunxv807vm0m8852nnrrk8mj8
 
Ethereum Address: 0xe69915c80dd75df19f438d556267e04f932f057d
 
More Info: Donation options for TZ
 

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.