Your donations are appreciated and help keep this site running. Even the smallest amount helps.
Thankyou

 
PROMOTE YOUR SITE
HERE
Only $3 USD/month
TRUTHSPOON.COM
The man they can't recruit!
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: The Council on Foreign Relations aka CFR: “We Shall Have One World Government… by Conquest or Consent.”

The Council on Foreign Relations aka CFR: “We Shall Have One World Government… by Conquest or Consent.” 02 Sep 2016 10:18 #1

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 17144
  • Likes received: 8018
By Joachim Hagopian

31st August 2016



New World Order propaganda rules and shapes the world. And there’s no more powerful propagator of propaganda that rules and shapes U.S. global hegemony, world events and major geopolitical developments than the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

On its own website, the CFR describes itself as “an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher.” However, the CFR is financed by the highly endowed, tax exempt Rockefeller, Ford and Carnegie foundations, and since its inception 95 years ago, it has been the most influential force dictating U.S. foreign policy throughout the 20th century (chauvinistically called “the American century”) and right into the present 21st century (aptly called “the New World Order century.”)

Read More: wakeup-world.com/2016/08/31/council-on-foreign-relations-we-shall-have-one-world-government-by-conquest-or-consent/
1365 = 1

1.1365 = 1,283,305,580,313,352
Last Edit: 02 Sep 2016 10:20 by novum.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy

The Council on Foreign Relations aka CFR: “We Shall Have One World Government… by Conquest or Consent.” 02 Sep 2016 10:22 #2

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 17144
  • Likes received: 8018
The CFR’s Public Relations Video

Assembling a diverse all-star cast of CFR members, the Council on Foreign Relations just released a self-serving infomercial video touting the significance and value of its expertise role in solving the complex challenges and problems facing humanity in the 21st century. In under three and a half minutes, multiple soundbites are delivered in rapid fire by strategically anointed elitists hailing from various walks of life, as they pontificate the need for CFR architects to masterfully craft sound U.S. foreign policy recommendations that promote peace, prosperity… and New World Order wisdom. (To view, click the image below.)

1365 = 1

1.1365 = 1,283,305,580,313,352
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Council on Foreign Relations aka CFR: “We Shall Have One World Government… by Conquest or Consent.” 02 Sep 2016 13:18 #3

  • GMP
  • GMP's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 3506
  • Likes received: 856
Only US citizens can join the CFR.
Not very 'one world' as far as that goes then.
:)
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Council on Foreign Relations aka CFR: “We Shall Have One World Government… by Conquest or Consent.” 14 Sep 2016 20:51 #4

GMP wrote:
Only US citizens can join the CFR.
Not very 'one world' as far as that goes then.
:)

except it has a sister organisation in the UK called The royal institute for international affairs aka chatham house

Those forums then have ties to other international organisations such as the trilateral commission and bilderberg
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy, rodin

The Council on Foreign Relations aka CFR: “We Shall Have One World Government… by Conquest or Consent.” 15 Sep 2016 07:25 #5

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 17144
  • Likes received: 8018
iamawaveofthesea wrote:
except it has a sister organisation in the UK called The royal institute for international affairs aka chatham house

Lynn is on both. :coffee:
1365 = 1

1.1365 = 1,283,305,580,313,352
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Council on Foreign Relations aka CFR: “We Shall Have One World Government… by Conquest or Consent.” 15 Sep 2016 07:29 #6

  • Aunty Lynn
  • Aunty Lynn's Avatar
  • Offline
  • John Podesta is a loser!
  • Posts: 29
  • Likes received: 13
novum wrote:
Lynn is on both. :coffee:

Watch yourself smart alec, because I am watching you. :twitch:
Philanthropist and proud member of the Council on Foreign Relations (USA), Chatham House (UK), the Institute for Strategic Studies (UK), the International Advisory Council of Asia House (UK), the Foreign Policy Association (USA), and Co-Chair of the Henry Jackson Initiative's report 'Towards a More Inclusive Capitalism'.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy

The Council on Foreign Relations aka CFR: “We Shall Have One World Government… by Conquest or Consent.” 15 Sep 2016 14:08 #7

  • Orangeaid
  • Orangeaid's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 11659
  • Likes received: 8020
novum wrote:
iamawaveofthesea wrote:
except it has a sister organisation in the UK called The royal institute for international affairs aka chatham house

Lynn is on both. :coffee:

Because she's married Evelyn she's on Chatham House too I'm gathering.
Last Edit: 15 Sep 2016 14:09 by Orangeaid.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Council on Foreign Relations aka CFR: “We Shall Have One World Government… by Conquest or Consent.” 15 Sep 2016 20:18 #8

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 17144
  • Likes received: 8018
I suppose so.. he is a British Knight, so she is a British Lady
1365 = 1

1.1365 = 1,283,305,580,313,352
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Council on Foreign Relations aka CFR: “We Shall Have One World Government… by Conquest or Consent.” 16 Sep 2016 11:16 #9

  • GMP
  • GMP's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 3506
  • Likes received: 856
Every so often we used to have 'Chatham House Rules' senior-staff meetings back in my salaried-job days.
Those are meetings that are unminuted, unattributable and , by 'rule' ; no one is supposed leak who said what ; to anyone who wasn't present at the meeting. The idea being that the meeting is only for the benefit of those attending and nobody else, even other members of staff who weren't included in the meeting.
I never actually saw a written copy of those 'Chatham House Rules' at the time but such meetings are a common feature in government service and the meeting Chair defines the rule prior to the meeting beginning.
Here it is....
"The Chatham House Rule reads as follows: When a meeting, or part thereof, is held under the Chatham House Rule, participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other participant, may be revealed."
Last Edit: 16 Sep 2016 11:24 by GMP.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: iamawaveofthesea

The Council on Foreign Relations aka CFR: “We Shall Have One World Government… by Conquest or Consent.” 17 Sep 2016 22:07 #10

GMP wrote:
Every so often we used to have 'Chatham House Rules' senior-staff meetings back in my salaried-job days.
Those are meetings that are unminuted, unattributable and , by 'rule' ; no one is supposed leak who said what ; to anyone who wasn't present at the meeting. The idea being that the meeting is only for the benefit of those attending and nobody else, even other members of staff who weren't included in the meeting.
I never actually saw a written copy of those 'Chatham House Rules' at the time but such meetings are a common feature in government service and the meeting Chair defines the rule prior to the meeting beginning.
Here it is....
"The Chatham House Rule reads as follows: When a meeting, or part thereof, is held under the Chatham House Rule, participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other participant, may be revealed."

I think the problem we have with that is the clear lack of transparency

The powers of centralisation love to tell us that if we have nothing to hide then we have nothing to worry about

Well we can turn that around on them and say: ''if they have nothing to hide then why are they so worried about the public hearing what they are saying?''

This is why the TTIP was discussed in private becasue they knew the public would not like what was being cooked up

So who are the politicians supposed to represent; the corporate fascists or the general public?

if its the general public then why are they so secretive?

We know why they are so secretive....it's because they don't represent the interests of the general public, they represent the interests of the corporate-fascists
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: GMP
Moderators: novum, rodin, Flare
Powered by Kunena Forum

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it. Secure transactions via paypal.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2019 - May 2020, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 260 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 210 - Raised
( £ 160 GBP )
donation thermometer
62%
Updated
6th January 2020

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.