Your donations are appreciated and help keep this site running. Even the smallest amount helps.
Thankyou

 
PROMOTE YOUR SITE
HERE
Only $3 USD/month
TRUTHSPOON.COM
The man they can't recruit!
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: Crowley, luciferianism and the dark 'arts' in the entertainment industry/Tate murders

Crowley, luciferianism and the dark 'arts' in the entertainment industry/Tate murders 11 Apr 2015 15:57 #1

  • annabelle
  • annabelle's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 2618
  • Likes received: 1740
This is a chapter taken from the book “Magick in Theory and Practice” by Aleister Crowley. The text contains comments from the editor. The term “FRATER PERDURABO” is used by the editor to refer to Crowley.

CHAPTER XII

OF THE BLOODY SACRIFICE: AND MATTERS COGNATE

It is necessary for us to consider carefully the problems connected with the bloody sacrifice, for this question is indeed traditionally important in Magick.

The animal should therefore be killed within the Circle, or the Triangle, as the case may be, so that its energy cannot escape. An animal should be selected whose nature accords with that of the ceremony — thus, by sacrificing a female lamb one would not obtain any appreciate quantity of the fierce energy useful to a Magician who was invoking Mars. In such a case a ram would be more suitable. And this ram should be virgin — the whole potential of its original total energy should not have been diminished in any way. For the highest spiritual working one must accordingly choose that victim which contains the greatest and purest force. A male child of perfect innocence and high intelligence is the most satisfactory and suitable victim. For evocations it would be more convenient to place the blood of the victim in the Triangle — the idea being that the spirit might obtain from the blood this subtle but physical substance which was the quintessence of its life in such a manner as to enable it to take on a visible and tangible shape.

Those magicians who object to the use of blood have endeavored to replace it with incense. For such a purpose the incense of Abramelin may be burnt in large quantities. Dittany of Crete is also a valuable medium. Both these incenses are very catholic in their nature, and suitable for almost any materialization. But the bloody sacrifice, though more dangerous, is more efficacious; and for nearly all purposes human sacrifice is the best.

raumfahrer.wordpress.com/manson ... sacrifice/

In his 1929 book Confessions and elsewhere, Crowley made vague references to his intelligence work, notably his 1914-19 mission in the U.S.A. There, he claimed, his public role as anti-British propagandist masked secret service on behalf of His Majesty. Such protestations were mostly dismissed as face-saving fantasies, but they really were the bare tip of the iceberg of the secret life of the "Wickedest Man in the World".

Back in 1999, I was busy working on a book dealing with the so-called Ace-of-Spies, Sidney Reilly. Crowley and Reilly were hanging around New York at the same time, so I was curious about a connection. I discovered a small file on Crowley long-forgotten in the WWI-era files of the U.S. Army's Military Intelligence Division. What leapt out was the conclusion that Crowley "was an employee of the British Government on official business of which the British Consul, New York City, has full cognizance," and that "the British Government was fully aware of the fact that Crowley was connected with…German propaganda and had received money for writing anti-British articles." So, the Beast had been telling the truth, or a least a little of it.

www.dazeddigital.com/artsandcult ... cret-agent

Golden Dawn temples were established in London, Scotland, and Paris; all key points of interest for Illuminati rituals (and Golden Dawn references are still seen to this day in videos such as those by Ciara):



Crowley inherited his father’s brewing wealth and attended Cambridge University and found pleasures in some forbidden homosexual (and heterosexual) activities. After his stint at college he further pursued his interest in alchemy and the occult, joining the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, which performed magic and drug rituals. The Golden Dawn’s three founders were Freemasons, and their masonic influence is present in Golden Dawn because it follows a similar initiation and hierarchy before gaining any true insider knowledge.

It should also be noted that Crowley spent time with other alleged Illuminati types such as dining with Aldous Huxley in 1930. Huxley was connected to the Fabian Society alongside George Orwell, who both have ties to the C.I.A. and the Mockingbird operation they performed..

The Mockingbird op funded the Hollywood film Animal Farm which was based on George Orwell’s book of the same name that was a warning about Communism. Orwell also wrote 1984 which is the totalitarian warning novel about a dreary future of big brother government. Orwell was rumored to be a member of the British socialist group, the Fabian Society (along with Aldous Huxley- writer of Brave New World). Operation Mockingbird had its tentacles ensnared in various affairs throughout the world (e.g. overthrowing foreign governments) and it would use Hollywood and the entertainment industry to manipulate the population in order to stay on track with the Illuminati agenda.



Aleister Crowley and his teachings have been promoted for decades by the establishment in numerous ways. I would say not only is he linked to the 'illuminati'.. he is a very strong and promoted root of it.

Crowley’s message has been promoted by members of 'the establishment' such as in music rock mega stars such as David Bowie, the Rolling Stones, and Led Zeppelin.

The album cover of The Beatles’ Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Heart Clubs Band features Crowley in the background:



The back of The Doors’ album entitled 13:



Ozzy Osbourne has the song entitled Mr. Crowley on his album Blizzard of Oz:



As mentioned before, Jimmy Page from Led Zeppelin bought the Boleskin House that Crowley performed rituals in, and this same house can be seen in the Led Zeppelin film Song Remains the Same:



Led Zeppelin Kennedy Center Honors



Led Zeppelin's Robert Plant joins Establishment after accepting CBE from Prince Charles.



The Rolling Stones are now fronted by Sir Mick Jagger, as the singer was knighted by Prince Charles this morning at a ceremony in Buckingham Palace in London.



quote:

OTO members included Jack Parsons, a famous pioneer in rocket science. Parsons also performed his own sex magick ritual by wife-swapping with none other than Scientology religion founder L. Ron Hubbard.

Some other pop culture influences include film maker Kenneth Anger who is a Crowley follower who influenced James Franco.

These two made collaborations on music videos such as Franco’s band Daddy who made Love in the Old Days which features an occult ritual. There was also an actual ritual that took place in Los Angeles with Kenneth Anger, James Franco, and Noot Seear from the Twilight film.







There are flashes of Aleister Crowley embedded during the ceremony in case you had any doubts:



And here’s a part of the ritual where we see the skull, which leads me to believe there is some Yale Skull & Bones action going on. There’s also a serpent on the table..



The guy playing the priest is Kenneth Anger, who has a history steeped in the occult and satanic worship. One of Anger’s films called Lucifer Rising from the ’70s included an actor and musician Bobby Beausoleil, who you might recall being affiliated with the Manson family. Beausoleil murdered Gary Hinman and wrote “Political Piggy” on the wall with Hinman’s blood. He did this on orders from Manson (arguably, but basically that’s what happened). Beasusoleil had a band also. What was the name of that band you ask? The Magick Powerhouse of Oz. Sounds oddly similar to the Great and Powerful Oz that Franco plays. Not even six degrees of separation between Charles Manson and James Franco now.



James Franco/Kenneth Anger 'Daddy' video:



And yet another odd peculiarity is that Franco is going to star and direct in an upcoming film called Beautiful People that is about hair stylist Jay Sebring. This biopic will include the (alleged.. possible false flag) murder of Sebring by the Manson family when they broke into the Tate residence at 10050 Cielo Drive and proceeded to slay in an abhorrent fashion. Add to that the occult basis of Wizard of Oz and author Frank L. Baum’s ties to the Theosophical Society, and it’s clear there are darker forces involved here.

Franco was also part of a Crowley ritual that took place in Los Angeles with Kenneth Anger and Noot Seear (Twilight: New Moon actress):

In conjunction with the current exhibition For the Martian Chronicles, L&M Arts is pleased to present The Bartzabel Working, a performance by filmmaker and artist Brian Butler. Based on a ceremonial evocation of the spirit of Mars, first written and performed in London in 1910 by the famed British occultist Aleister Crowley, the ritual later became part of Los Angeles history in 1946 when Jet Propulsion Laboratory rocket scientist and Crowley protégé Jack Parsons conducted his own version of this rite, with the intention of placing a martial curse on a pre-Scientology L. Ron Hubbard.

For his reinterpretation of this historical performance, Butler will conjure Bartzabel, the spirit of Mars, evoking the site that was once home to the late sci-fi author Ray Bradbury and currently comprises L&M Arts. The ritual will have Butler as Chief Magus, leading a cast drawn from his upcoming feature film King Death and featuring Henry Hopper as Assistant Magus, Noot Seear as Magus Adjuvant, and James Franco as Material Basis, the vessel though which the spirit of Mars manifests.



Here’s Noot Seear from Twilight:



And here’s Franco giving us the one-all seeing eye salute:



And here’s a picture of Anger with his shirt off, showing us his love for Lucifer by getting it tattoed on his chest:



Here’s that Lucifer Rising:







In his book, The Ultimate Evil, investigator author Maury Terry writes that between 1966 and 1967, a Satanic-group the Process Church Cult [PCC], sought to recruit the Rolling Stones and the Beatles. He also goes on to implicate the PCC in the Charles Manson and Son of Sam [David Berkowitz] multiple murders. A key link between the Rolling Stones and the PCC, is Kenneth Anger, a follower of Aleister Crowley.

illuminatiwatcher.com/illuminati ... ays-video/
Last Edit: 12 Apr 2015 20:45 by annabelle.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: novum, PFIZIPFEI, Orangeaid

Crowley, luciferianism and the dark 'arts' in the entertainment industry 11 Apr 2015 17:00 #2

  • wiikkidd
  • wiikkidd's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Gold Member
  • Posts: 5699
  • Likes received: 938
They strung up Sharon Tate per masonic ritual by one leg. The LAPD 'cleaned-up the crime scene as well of more insider damning clues.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Crowley, luciferianism and the dark 'arts' in the entertainment industry 11 Apr 2015 19:50 #3

  • annabelle
  • annabelle's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 2618
  • Likes received: 1740
Why have so few ever asked if the alleged Tate murders might have been just another instance of
discrediting the hippies, and thereby the anti-war protesters? As we look back, we can see that no other
event so discredited and neutralized the hippie movement as the Tate murders. Due to the awful press
Charles Manson and his followers gave to the hippies, the movement was dead by early 1970.

The entire anti-war movement was dealt a crushing blow by the Tate murders, since the press used it to marginalize
not only the hippies, but all protesters and “malcontents.” This was a well-bought success for the
government, since they were able to spin the Vietnam war out for five more years, spending countless
billions more and enriching the already rich via Pentagon contracts.

Famous author Joan Didion wrote, “Many people I know in Los Angeles believe the 60's ended abruptly
on August 9, 1969; ended at the exact moment when word of the murders traveled like brushfire through
the community.”1 This would apply not only to Los Angeles, but to the entire United States. Given that
the Tate murders did end the 60's and the hippie movement, we should ask if the Tate murders were
intended to end the hippie movement. It seems very convenient for Nixon, Reagan, Hoover and the
Pentagon that the perfect crime should happen at the perfect time.

It seems very convenient that the first so-called “cult killings” known in Modern culture should occur as if on
cue from the CIA, just in time to stop the rising peace movement. What a coincidence that the hippies would
choose to go insane at just that moment, six days before Woodstock, murdering a beautiful blonde female (the perfect victim in any
tragedy—see the fake Jessica Lynch rescue for a later example), still pregnant with a child (the other
perfect victim).

What a coincidence that they should write anti-government slogans on the wall, like
“Death to Pigs”. What a coincidence that their leader should be the perfect patsy—a serial jailbird who
had asked to be sent back to jail. That's right. Manson didn't want to be released from jail in 1967. Tom
Snyder even admitted that on TV in 1981. How convenient that the government set up someone who
wanted to be set up, sending a man back to jail for life who wanted to go back to jail.

Let me put it this way: if the FBI were looking for someone to be a patsy, they could not have found someone better than
Manson. He had a wild-eyed look, played the guitar and sang like the hippies, wore his hair long, was a
lifetime criminal, and wanted to go back to jail. How convenient. He was another actor, a willing patsy,
playing the part he had been hired to play. He was actually the most brilliant actor of all of them, and still
is.

Sharon Tate was an actor. Her career started in 1965 with the movie Eye of the Devil, a movie about devil worship and sacrificial murders,
where Sharon plays a witch. More recently she had played a vampire in the Fearless Vampire Killers; then
she played a slut in the Valley of the Dolls, one who has an abortion, becomes a soft-core porn actress and
then kills herself with downers; then she had a bit part in Rosemary's Baby. Curious how all these films
have to do with babies, blood, and death. In the Manson murders, she was just continuing a trend. You
might say she was typecast.

The same can be said for Roman Polanski. He was the director of Fearless
Vampire Killers and Rosemary's Baby, and he was one of the leads in the former, becoming a vampire at
the end. If the FBI had been looking for someone to direct a Satanic slasher film, they could not have
found a more perfect candidate. Does no one but me find that to be a big red flag? The murder takes
place in the home of a director of Satanic murder films3, and actors are murdered? No one thought that
was suspicious?

In 1963, Polanski directed an episode for a Dutch movie entitled. . . The Best Swindles in the World.

Jay Sebring—one of the other alleged victims—was also an actor. He was better known for his hair salons
for men, but in 1969 he was an actor. He had a part in a Batman episode that year. He had been in the
underground film Mondo Hollywood. He was also a friend of producer Bill Dozier, and they together
started the career of Bruce Lee, who was an actor.

Sebring had been in the navy for four years, according to his bio. It is also possible he was still working for naval intelligence ONI in
1969† though I don't believe anyone before me has suggested that. Also curious that Sebring's business
did not fail with his alleged death, despite the fact that he had not sold it or made any plans for its
continuation. There is absolutely no information about this on the internet, with the encyclopedia
entries on Sebring International being nothing but stubs (see below for more on this). Among the
famous salon clients of Sebring were Frank Sinatra and Jim Morrison.

Sebring's next of kin, his nephew Anthony DiMaria. Looks a lot like an actor,
doesn't he? That's because he is. Look him up at IMDB. He has no age posted on the internet and his
acting career didn't start until the 1990's. He also didn't get involved with the parole hearings until the
1990's, which is strange. In a well-known blog at Tatelabianca.blogspot.com, we find this 2006 post from
“Colonel Scott”:

I met Jay's nephew one afternoon 18 years ago at the USC special collection library. He did not even know the details of his
uncle's murder. I had to turn him on to the HelterSkelter novel, because that was all I knew at the time. Now, he remains the
ONLY next of kin on the Sebring side to EVER attend a parole hearing. And even then he only did DECADES after the
murder.

Curious. More actors involved.

“Anthony DiMaria and Dennis Hopper while filmed 'Sebring'”. I assume the documentary
was created as propaganda, but it must have been very unsuccessful propaganda, perhaps even divulging
some real information.


Anthony DiMaria

Speaking of Hopper, he is the one who spoke out to the Los Angeles Times back in 1969, saying,

They [at the Tate house] had fallen into sadism and masochism and bestiality—and they recorded it all on videotape, too.
The L.A. police told me this. I know that three days before they were killed twenty-five people were invited to that house for a
mass-whipping of a dealer from Sunset Strip who’d given them bad dope.

That is clearly planted information, or disinformation. Notice that Hopper even admits the information
was planted on him by the LA police. Was Hopper the mouthpiece of the LA police, and if so, why? Can't
the police do their own press conferences? This is your red flag for Hopper in this paper. That and the
fact that Hopper admits his father was in Intelligence. Like father like son.

We know from Operation Gladio that all the European secret services are linked to the US secret service,
and they often work together. The Process Church came out of Mayfair, London, so we may assume it is
MI6.

But back to Jay Sebring:



There's some more very important information in that post. Jay Sebring, president of a record company.
The poster doesn't tell us what paper that is from, so we can't confirm it. He only says it is from 1965.
Looks like Terry Melcher wasn't the only one in the recording business. The web of contacts Sebring
actually had is beginning to get fleshed out, and we can only ask why this fact has been scrubbed from the
web and the rest of the world.

A lot of people don't want you to know anything about Jay Sebring, except
that he cut hair.

Wojciech Frykowski—another alleged victim—was “educated exclusively at the film school in Poland.”
He had a part in Polanski's early film Mammals, which he also financed and produced. His younger
brother Jerzy "Jerry" Frykowski is a movie production manager well-known in Europe. Frykowski's son
Bartlomiej also became a cinematographer. Frykowski was hoping Polanski would get him a job in the
movie industry in Los Angeles, which we will see he did, in a way. You will learn much more about
Frykowski below.

Abigail Folger—another alleged victim—wasn't an actress, as far as I know, but as an heiress in the
Folger's coffee family she was connected to top political people, including the Kennedys. She had worked
on Robert Kennedy's campaign in 1968, and, as you will remember, he was also killed in very mysterious
circumstances.

Bobby Kennedy had dinner at a Malibu beach house on June 5, 1968, before being driven to the Ambassador Hotel, where he was shot and killed. Sharon Tate and Roman Polanski were also present at that dinner party in Malibu.

When Manson lived in San Francisco, Abigail Folger loaned $10,000 to the Straight Theater at Haight and
Cole Streets. Note that: theater. Folger was involved with actors and giving them money. Manson then
lived on Cole Street, on the same block as the Process Church. Fast forward to LA, where Manson and
Folger met at the house of Cass Elliot.2 Some have said that Folger loaned money to Manson, and if these
things are true, Folger looks like one of the private funders of the entire operation. Folger is also said to
have given money to Timothy Leary, the underground film-maker Kenneth Anger, and the Himalayan
Academy (which was located not far from the Esalen Institute—see below for more on Esalen).

Paul Tate




All that is suggestive, but the biggest red flag in this whole charade is that Sharon's father Paul Tate was a
colonel in army intelligence
.† That rank is just under general. They don't tell us exactly in what capacity
he served, of course, but they do admit he served for 23 years, (supposedly) ending in 1969. So he started
in 1946. Interestingly, that is when army intelligence was split into various departments, including the
CIA. Yes, the CIA started in 1947.

In 1959, the Tates moved to Verona, Italy, where Paul Tate was stationed at Passalacqua, the headquarters
for SETAF (Southern European Task Force). This links him to Operation Gladio. General Maletti—
commander of Italian military intelligence at the time of the Tate murders—later testified in court that
the CIA had been involved in many false flag operations in Italy and Europe, including murders and
bombings, “for the purpose of creating an Italian nationalism that was capable of halting what it saw as a
slide to the left.”

Sound familiar? Maletti added, “Don't forget that Nixon was in charge and Nixon was a
strange man, a very intelligent politician but a man of rather unorthodox initiatives.” Nixon was in charge
in 1969, but Operation Gladio had been instituted by Allen Dulles much earlier, and it was financed in
large part by the US, through the CIA, which Dulles led under Eisenhower and Kennedy (1953 to late
1961).

The Operation kicked into high gear in the late 50's to counter growing “leftist” movements,
especially in Italy. We must assume that is why Paul Tate was in Verona in 1959 with his family. Paul Tate
was not just military, he was a colonel in intelligence, which indicates he was probably involved in Gladio.

One of these Gladio false flags was the Piazza Fontana bombing of 1969, just a few months after the
alleged Tate murders. The bombing was initially attributed to anarchists (violent hippies, you know), but
it later came out in testimony like that of General Maletti that these bombings were really the work of the
CIA, in league with other European intelligence agencies.

This indicates that Sharon Tate's own father was capable of organizing false flag events, and knew others who could help with whatever needed to be done, including faking deaths and pinning them on leftists. You may think of the Tate murders as just
one more Gladio false flag operation against the left. Yes, the Manson murders were an instance of
Gladio moving to the US.

How did that happen, exactly? Well, it happened in 1962 when Paul Tate was transferred from Italy to
Fort MacArthur in San Pedro, just south of Torrance and about 20 miles south of Hollywood. It appears
that military intelligence may have seen some use for Paul Tate's pretty daughter, and they sent the family
back to Los Angeles to put the plan in motion. We assume he was transferred to MacArthur, since that
was the base in San Pedro, but although the Tate family may have lived in San Pedro, Paul Tate was more
likely assigned to Lookout Mountain base in Laurel Canyon about 25 miles away, which was still secret at
the time (see below).

Either that or he transferred over there once the operation solidified a few years
later. During an interview with Merv Griffin in 1966, Sharon says that her father was stationed in
Vietnam at the time. That is possible, but it is more likely to be a cover story. At any rate, they would
need him back in Los Angeles by 1967 or 1968, to work on the great Tate event. As soon as Manson was
released in 1967, they must have already begun setting the stage.

We have more indication of this from online sources, which admit that Paul Tate dressed up like a hippie
after his daughter's alleged murder, allegedly to try to discover who murdered her. But that fact is
commonly passed over or misread. It should be a huge red flag. We have an admission that military
intelligence had a colonel dressed up as a hippie right after the murders, attempting to infiltrate them.

That fact is spun to make us think that Paul Tate was there in his own capacity, as a private citizen. But if
he was really retired at that point and working as a private citizen, he was breaking the law. Private
citizens are not allowed to work in law enforcement, and after the alleged murders, any involvement in
the investigation was considered law enforcement. Any private investigators have to be licensed. Of
course the truth is much worse than that, since we should make some attempt to read this fact without
the spin. Paul Tate wasn't just acting as some sort of vigilante father. He was doing his job.

He wasn't retired. He is said to have died in 2005 at age 82, which would have made him just 46 in 1969. Colonels
don't normally retire at 46, since they are only one promotion away from brigadier general.† It is far more
likely that he didn't start dressing up as a hippie after the murders. He only got caught dressing up as a
hippie after the murders. Someone recognized him, that is, and the CIA had to come up with a cover
story to explain it. But he had probably been undercover for months, as part of the operation.

It is likely he was the one running the whole thing from the hippie side, wearing a beard and tie-dyes. How has
everyone managed to miss that for 43 years? Some of the things I discovered for this paper, Mae Brussell
could not have been expected to know in the 1970's, but any good researcher at the time should have seen
Paul Tate as the biggest red flag in all of California.

If you don't believe an Intelligence colonel would dress up as a hippie and try to infiltrate the movement,
try reading the book Acid Dreams, where we find this:

It was a typical sixties scene: a group of scruffy, long-haired students stood in a circle passing joints and hash
pipes. The setting could have been Berkeley, Ann Arbor or any other hip campus. But these students were
actually FBI agents, and the school they attended was known as “Hoover University.” Located at Quantico Marine
Base in Virginia, this elite academy specialized in training G-men to penetrate left-wing organizations. To cultivate
the proper counterculture image, they were told not to wash or bathe for several days before infiltrating a group of
radicals. Refresher courses were also held for FBI agents who had successfully immersed themselves in the drug
culture of their respective locales.
19

And it wasn't just FBI, it was also CIA. It wasn't in Virginia for no reason. Langley was just up the road.
Nor is the book Acid Dreams some fringe publication. Look it up on Wikipedia, where you will see it is a
respected book widely referenced by the mainstream. The government has long admitted it did these
things.

Actually, we know Paul Tate wasn't retired on August 9. We are told he resigned two weeks before his
scheduled retirement, but both the resignation and scheduled retirement were after the murders. He
resigned because of the murder of his daughter, we are told. This by itself is a red flag, since the odds of
Paul Tate's retirement being scheduled two weeks after August 9 are extremely low. In fact, they are zero,
since colonels are not scheduled to retire at age 46. They may take early retirement, but it isn't
“scheduled.”

This wording is suspicious, and we must assume it used only to make a reader think his
retirement had already been planned. But if it had been planned, why would he need to resign two weeks
early? There is no need to “resign” in such a circumstance, since, given the murder of his daughter, his
superiors would no doubt give him leave for those two remaining weeks. Again, we are being told he
resigned two weeks early to give the impression he was not military intelligence when he was dressed up
as a hippie.

They are trying to divert you from the realization that in any case we have a military
intelligence colonel dressed up as a hippie roaming the streets of LA. Whether he is on leave or resigned
or soon to retire is not to the point: he is the same person no matter what. He is a gigantic red flag no
matter what.

For more strange links, take a look at this:



This young man Wayne Mall, who dated Sharon's sister Debra, had a motorcycle accident in November,
1970, just one year after the murders. But what is interesting is what we learn about Paul Tate. In 1971,
Tate was opening Tate Gallery for Men's Hair Design in Rolling Hills. What? Rolling Hills is just west of
San Pedro, near Long Beach. It is also just north of the old military base Fort MacArthur. So we have a
clear link between Paul Tate and Jay Sebring. How long had Paul Tate been interested in hair design?

Or, more to the point, how long had the CIA been involved in hair design for men? Was Tate's new salon
going to be a cover for intelligence, and if so, had Sebring's salon been a cover for intelligence all along?
This gives us more indication that Sebring was involved in naval intelligence. In this paper, you will see
that Sebring, Paul Tate, Susan Atkins, and Charles Watson all had ties to hair salons.

Sebring Hair Power; a 2" x 3.5" business card, reading, "Sebring Incorporated, Lt. Col. Paul J. Tate (ret.)
(photo in link for article)

Paul Tate, master of disguise. See how he shaved his head and beard for the funeral, in pic 6? (photos in link)
Remember, he had been disguised with long hair and a beard after the murders, looking for the killers. But at the
funeral, all that is gone. He wants to look as different as possible: not to fool the non-existent killers, but
to fool you, any real hippies he may be framing, and any future clients of his hair salon. I included pic 4
just for fun. What's going on there, exactly? Is there anything these guys don't film?

Take note of the fifth picture, of Paul Tate in navy uniform. So he would originally have been navy
intelligence, not army intelligence. Why does that matter? Because Jay Sebring was also navy. This gives
us another link between Paul Tate and Jay Sebring. They may have both come into intelligence from navy.
There is another thing linking Paul Tate, Jay Sebring, Roman Polanski, and Charles Manson. They were
all very short men. While watching the NBC film of the funeral, I noticed that Paul Tate was only about
5'5”.
Jay Sebring was also around 5'5”. Roman Polanski is even shorter, being about 5'3”. Charles Manson
is also about 5'3”. Why would this matter, and what could it indicate? Well, if Paul Tate was in control of
this operation, he may have recruited people that were also short. No one likes to give orders to someone
towering over him. I suspect one of the qualities they liked best about Manson when they were scouring
the local jails in 1967 for a patsy is that he was extremely short.



This made it slightly more difficult to build him up into a scary monster, but they easily got around it. I
asked some people recently how tall they thought Manson was, and they all said about six feet. It is
amazing what you can do with the press.

Paul Tate used the press to promote Sharon from early on as well. She appeared on the cover of Stars and
Stripes magazine in the early 60's, astride a US Army missile. Do you imagine her father didn't know
anything about it? Stars and Stripes is the military's own magazine, and it operates from inside the
Pentagon. We are told he disapproved, but this is unlikely.



Where did the “Manson family” live? The SPAHN'S MOVIE RANCH! Wikipedia tells us it was “used for filming generally Western-themed movies and television programs. With mountainous terrain, boulder-strewn scenery, and an 'old Western town' set,
Spahn Ranch was a versatile filming site for many scripts.” Hmmm. That's curious, wouldn't you say?
The perpetrators were living on a movie set. We are told that Mr. Spahn allowed the Manson family to
move in rent-free in 1968. So nice of him. Then as now, old ranchers just love young hippies to hang
around, smoking dope, shagging each other, and creating big piles of trash. Also convenient for the
government is that all the buildings and sets were destroyed by a fire in 1970, preventing anyone from
doing any forensic work there.

...we find that in April of 1969, one of the lesser and younger (age 15) Manson girls,
RuthAnn Morehouse, was arrested and placed in juvenile hall. She was released into the custody of
George Spahn, who acted as a foster parent in the eyes of the court. What? RuthAnn's father Dean was
not dead, and Spahn was no relation. Nor was he fit to be a foster parent, being in his 80's and legally
blind. He was not fit to be a foster parent, but he was fit (we suppose) to be her handler.

Someone simply arranged for her to be returned to the set, since she was one of the props. Ed Sanders implies that
this was a measure of the power Manson had, but Manson had no power in juvenile courts. The only
bodies that have any power over juvenile courts are federal agencies—either FBI or CIA or DIA.
Everything to do with the Spahn Ranch stinks of a big federal operation.

By this time, the ranch had turned into a huge magnet for runaways and juvenile delinquents from all
over the state, and the mainstream story admits that the LA police were well aware of it. And yet we are
supposed to believe nothing was done? Reagan sends in the National Guard to bust up college students
making speeches and planting trees, but he and the LA police and the state police leave a huge hippie
commune in the LA suburbs alone, even while it is allegedly making porn films, acting as a nudist retreat,
harboring underage girls, selling drugs, kidnapping schoolgirls, stealing cars, running motorcycle and
dune buggy races, threatening neighbors, storing weapons, giving loud all-night parties, fraternizing with
biker gangs and Satanists, and so on? We are expected to believe that all these local agencies are going to
not only turn a blind eye to the Spahn Ranch, but return an arrested 15-year-old girl to the premises, in
the care of Mr. Magoo, I mean George Spahn?

Another curious thing about the Spahn Ranch is that the Transcontinental Development Corporation was
buying up property all around the Ranch and wanted the Spahn Ranch as well. But rather than sell the
otherwise worthless property—which we are led to believe was subsisting on pony rides—Spahn preferred
to keep the place as-is, a rent-free haven for ex-cons, junkies, and titty dancers. Spahn's refusal to sell can
only be explained once we realize he was getting extremely well paid by the feds to keep the place as a
movie set, actors and agents haunt, and center of operations for Project CHAOS.

At any rate, we have already seen that the Manson family is known to have lived on a movie set. The
crime scene was the home of a movie director famous for Satanic slasher movies. The prime victim was
an actress. At least two secondary victims were actors. The lead victim's father was a colonel in military
intelligence. But no one ever thought to ask if this was a movie paid for by the government? How
difficult is that question to ask? Why did Mae Brussell never get to it? Why is it not to be found in 43
years and millions of pages of research by tens of thousands of people?

Before we get to other explosive evidence, let's take a quick look at the trial of Manson. I can't get into in
detail here—that would take a book. But everyone who has studied the trial knows it was a sham. In the
UCLA video archives, you can find footage where Vincent Bugliosi bragged that it was the longest and
most expensive trial in history, and that record probably still stands. He also tells us it received more
publicity than any other trial in American history, and even when competing with trials like the Scopes
Monkey trial and the O.J. Simpson trial, we assume he is correct.

As for the publicity, you should ask yourself why the trial was such a media circus. No other trial even comes close as a matter of theatrics.
All the major parts seemed to have been filled by a casting director seeking the most beautiful, expressive,
or otherwise memorable faces and personalities.



Tell me that doesn't look like a scene from a play. What actors' trunk did they pull those dresses from?
They don't look like witches, hippies, or anything else. They look like a CIA director's idea of “mod young
girls.” Van Houten looks like she was dressed from the wardrobe of Star Trek. Even the police woman's
wig looks like it came from an actors' trunk. Does that look like a real police woman's uniform? Look at
the waist! Do you think police women had coats with cinched waists in the 1960's? Her waist not only
looks like it is about 24”, the coat is cut to match it. Show me one real police woman who was ever dressed
in a coat like that and I will give you a commendation. That isn't city issue. That is Hollywood issue.
But can you tell me why that photo above has been suppressed? More continuity problems:



Bugliosi admitted that “the six killers turned out to be so incredibly far-out and unusual in their lifestyles
and philosophies, that when their identities became known they actually upstaged the victims.”
Considering that the victims in the Tate house were jet-setting actresses and stylists, this must be seen as
fairly incredible. Looking back, we can say with little fear of contradiction that the Manson family actors
overplayed their parts by a wide margin, and that the stage direction became more and more fantastical as
the play progressed. By the end, all semblance of reality had been left far behind, and only the fact that
the television audience in the 1960's was still in its infancy, and thereby utterly credulous and naïve, can
explain the success of the script.

Now go to minute 23:00 (TCR 1:00:00) of the linked video.



Bugliosi is telling the reporter that the Tate murders are the “most bizarre, savage, nightmarish murders in the recorded annals of time,” and thatLinda Kasabian, while testifying, “was filled with emotion describing the first night of horror.”
Unfortunately, we see film of Kasabian walking the hall afterwards in her Little House on the Prairie
dress, and she is smiling and grinning. The cameraman is grinning back at her. Is that the emotion
Bugliosi is talking about? Watch Bugliosi, too: he is obviously reading from a script. This was before
Teleprompters, you know. Bugliosi is looking down at a script posted low and in front of him, out of shot.
Not only do we get the “bizarre, savage, nightmarish murders,” we get the “horrible, horrendous screams.”
So poetic. The questions are also planted as well, since Bugliosi doesn't even have to scan down the script
to find an answer. The question is also on the script, and the journalists hit their cues like the pros they
are.

I also send you to minute 1:21 of the linked video, where Barbara Hoyt is giving testimony to reporters in
the hallway outside of the courtroom. Hoyt is not the smartest person in the world, but even she knows
better than that. She says, “I don't know if I should,” and looks around. Apparently her handlers assure
her, and she tells her story about overhearing Atkins. The tape is cut, so some will say she didn't tell
anything, but after the cut, the reporter admits that she just told one minute's worth of story. We know
because he tells Hoyt that there are known to be five minutes' worth of conversation in Atkins' dialogue,
but Hoyt has only told the reporters one minute's worth. The reporter wants the full five minutes. In the
real world, Hoyt's blabbing for a full minute would cause a mistrial, but not here. I'm just surprised they
didn't bring the girls into the newsroom and have them give their testimony direct to the public on air.
That would have simplified the process considerably. The reporter here is really funny. He says, “We just
want you to tell us what happened for the record.” For what record? Last time I checked, the “record” was
kept in the courtroom, not out in the hall.

We have looked at the fake publicity, now let's look at the cost. This was the most expensive trial in
history, but it was only half a trial. There was a prosecution but no defense, so all the cost was on the side
of the prosecution. The defense rested without calling a single witness. Manson's lawyers declined
to cross examine most witnesses for the prosecution, and Manson was prevented by the judge from cross
examining them himself—although he had asked to represent himself. Compare that to the O.J. Simpson
trial, where most of the cost was on the side of the defense. Simpson hired several of the most expensive
defense attorneys in the country, including Alan Dershowitz, F. Lee Bailey, and Robert Shapiro. Simpson
spent something like 6 million on his team of eight lawyers. But Manson wasn't allowed to make any
defense, either through his inept lawyers or by his own testimony. Manson's first attorney was Ronald
Hughes, and the Manson trial was Hughes' very first time in a courtroom. He had been an attorney for
less than a year. Hughes disappeared during the trial and was later “found dead,” and we can assume that
is because he wanted to actually do his job, or because he stumbled upon the evidence I will give you
below. Either that or it was just one more fake death in the script, put there to further demonize the
hippies. The mainstream floated the idea that the Manson family got him, but why would the Manson
family get Hughes, one of the only people on their side? We know Hughes complained loudly to the judge
when Van Houten wasn't allowed to give testimony that Manson had nothing to do with the murders. If
Hughes was really killed, the prosecution had much more motive.

Although this was the most publicized event in the history of the US legal system, no change of venue
outside of Los Angeles was granted. No continuance was granted. Despite that, the prosecuting attorney
was allowed to enter exhibits into evidence consisting of magazine and newspaper articles, including
LIFE magazine. These articles had titles such as “The Manson Family Murders.” Notice that is not the
alleged Manson family murders. The judge was allowing exhibits that had already decided the guilt of the
accused!

There was no real evidence against Manson, and the prosecution even admitted he wasn't at the murder
scene and didn't take part in it. He was convicted of masterminding it, not committing it. He was
convicted solely on the basis of testimony of his fellow alleged perpetrators, who turned on him under
duress from the State. This testimony came from a group of young girls who had done so many drugs
they could barely speak. It was admitted that the main witnesses for the prosecution had taken as many
as 300 acid trips in their short lives, so their brains were basically fried.

The lead witness was Linda Kasabian, who also didn't take part in the actual murders, but was nonetheless charged with seven counts
of murder in order to scare her. She was given immunity for her testimony. Another main witness was
Susan Atkins, who was given immunity from the death penalty for testimony against Manson, which she
initially gave. However, Atkins sobered up for a moment later on and repudiated all that testimony.
Kasabian revealed clear signs of coaching during the trial, and was obviously just repeating a story given
to her by the State.

Then there is the matter of the 25 unidentified fingerprints at the Tate house. In any real investigation,
that would be impossible. Given the length of the investigation and all the people that were questioned
(all those who had been at parties at the house in the past couple of years, for instance), it is inconceivable
that that many fingerprints would go unassigned. It is unfortunate for the controllers of this story that
they let the police admit to all those fingerprints, since they are a clear sign that the scene was not closed
to the people we are told were in it. It is a clear sign of the presence of the invisible CIA or FBI crew that
was there setting up and filming these fake murders. Some of the Manson family attorneys touch on this
point, but of course they don't go where I go. They point out the very high number of fingerprints and the
fact that this must leave the matter of perpetrators wide open (especially in the trial of Krenwinkel), but
they appear to have never stumbled on the correct reading of the scene—which would have allowed them
to point to the likely owners of those fingerprints.

To top it all off, President Nixon declared Manson guilty while the trial was still in session.



The jury saw that headline when Manson held up that paper in court. Still, no mistrial. The judge only
asked the jurors if they had been influenced by the headline. They said they hadn't been influenced. I
guess Jesus Christ could have appeared in court in a burning bush, saying Manson was guilty, and still no
mistrial. Each and every juror could have appeared on the Merv Griffin show and recited testimony,
telling Merv how they felt about it. But as long as they swore to the judge that they felt pure afterwards,
no mistrial.

With that headline in mind, remember what I told you before: the judge allowed magazine articles from
LIFE and other places to be entered as evidence, even though those articles had pre-judged Manson and
the other defendants based on hearsay. So why was this Nixon headline such a big deal? To be consistent,
the judge should have just taken the newspaper out of Manson's hand and entered it as “evidence.”

To see other ways the trials of Atkins and Manson were a joke, you may read an article from September 7.
1970, which admits that two attorneys for the defense had spent many nights in jail for contempt during
the trials, and that a third (Hughes) was so poor he couldn't afford a suit for the trial. He had to borrow a
coat from a reporter.

The article admits that the trials, which should have been somber at best, were
actually filled with laughter. Those in the audience could see what a farce the whole thing was.
We see part of this joke when Bugliosi is interviewed at minute 39 of the above video. Bugliosi tells us
that Manson has been denied his writ of habeas corpus because he was not pro per (or pro se) at the time.
What that means is that Manson wasn't allowed to petition the court because he was not representing
himself.

Bugliosi tells us that Manson's attorney needed to petition the court, since Manson had no
standing. But that is all false, since anyone can petition a judge for habeas corpus. Every prisoner
automatically has standing to file habeas corpus, and it has nothing to do with whether you are
representing yourself or whether you have an attorney.

In English common law, habeas corpus is known
as the “great writ,” and it has the force of a court order. It cannot be overridden or ignored by a judge
based on a technicality like pro per. To see Bugliosi standing there telling us a judge ruled against habeas
corpus based on pro per is beyond corrupt. In any other trial, it would be the most extraordinary sign of
corruption one could imagine, but in the Manson trial, it was just one of many.

Remember, a person accused of murder is assigned a public defender if he cannot afford his own attorney.
So if a judge could refuse habeas corpus to everyone who already had an attorney, no one could ever file
habeas corpus. The state could just say, “Hey, we already assigned you an attorney, so you aren't pro se
and can't file habeas corpus. You will say, “Well, in that case you could just get your attorney to file,
couldn't you?” Didn't work for Manson, did it? When his personal writ failed, did they then allow his
attorney to file for him? Apparently not. You get only once chance, according to the great Bugliosi. Once
they get you on a technicality, your attorney is permanently muzzled.

At the end of the trial, Manson was allowed to make a statement, but the jury was removed from the
courtroom. The reason given was to prevent Manson from implicating his co-defendants, and they cited
People v. Aranda to justify this. But this was nonsense of the first order, since Manson's co-defendants
had been implicating him for weeks. His entire conviction was based on testimony by his co-defendants.

The trial was a mockery of justice from the first day. Bugliosi was allowed not only to railroad Manson
and the other defendants, but also to concoct the story for the press. His book Helter Skelter10 has defined
the story ever since, although it is nothing but fiction. We may assume he was fed the entire story by the
CIA.

Amazingly, Bugliosi—in an interview right after the verdict—himself outlines some of the problems in
the trial that could lead to appeals. He mentions the incredible pre-trial publicity—which anyone can see
must have prejudiced all jurors (as it was meant to). He mentions the disappearance of Manson's
attorney Hughes. He mentions Nixon's statement on the front pages. And those are just the tip of the
iceberg. But the interesting question in this context is why a chief prosecuting attorney would publicly
give tips to the defense in what to appeal.

Clearly, those in control of these events wished for them to
remain in the papers as long as possible. The prosecution wanted to see appeals, as many as possible.
This is unprecedented, but it helps explain Nixon's remarks. Remember, the remarks of Nixon were not
off-the-cuff. Nixon was reading from cue cards at the time. It was a prepared statement. No one has ever
been able to make sense of that.

Why would the President wish to undermine Manson's prosecution, and
do so in such an extraordinary manner? Nixon was a lawyer himself. He knew exactly what he was doing.
He knew such a statement showed extraordinary prejudice, that it would be reported in bold headlines,
and that it would impact the trial. Why would he do that? Because he knew the outcome was
predetermined.

There was no chance Manson would ultimately win. But Nixon, like Bugliosi, wished to
see as many appeals as possible, in order that the story be kept in the papers and on TV as long as
possible. As it turns out, the case is still on TV and in the papers 43 years later.

The appeals were equally absurd. No trial in history was so monumentally compromised from the first
day as were the original Manson trials. Literally thousands of points of appeal were available to the
defense, and everyone who followed the trials expected the appellate court to either overturn the
convictions or return them to the lower court for a retrial.

To confirm the proceedings of the lower court
would be to admit on paper that the US legal system was finished. I think even Bugliosi expected that
from the appellate court, and he no doubt looked forward to grandstanding for another year. But that
isn't what happened. I suppose the government decided it had gotten all the mileage it was going to get
out of the story. By that time (1975-76) Nixon was gone, Hoover was gone, and the Vietnam War was over.
The entire appellate decision is at law.justia.com, and I recommend you study it if you have any interest in
the law.

That decision may be even more corrupt than the original decision, since it is a decision not by a
jury, but by judges who are supposed to know the law. We expect lawyers to flout logic and we expect
jurors to be ignorant, but seeing such blatant and overt corruption from appellate judges is more
disconcerting than either. As long as judges are honest, lawyers and juries can be kept in line. But if
judges are corrupt, the whole system is finished. And it is, in fact, finished. This appellate decision reads
like the deathknell of English jurisprudence. From then on, the courts—like everything else—would be
controlled by military intelligence.

I will mention only the gravest instance of this corruption. The appellate court admits that chief
prosecutor Bugliosi met in private with Manson several times, without the consent of Manson's counsel
Kanarek. The appellate court admits this is a “grave” violation of Manson's Miranda rights. It admits that
it is a violation by Bugliosi of the Rules of Professional Conduct, even citing the relevant clause: Bus. &
Prof. Code, § 6076. But the appellate court chooses—completely mysteriously and without explanation—
to do nothing about either. It neither overturns the conviction, nor sends it back to the lower court, nor
brings Bugliosi up for disciplinary action.

I mention this instance of corruption in the appellate decision over hundreds of others since it is
pertinent in another way. As you see, it proves my thesis as well, since it gives Bugliosi the opportunity to
discuss the script with Manson. If the entire trial is scripted and controlled, then we would need a way
for the two sides to compare notes and make plans.

No play is completely self-propelled: the actors need
guidance all along the way, to prevent mistakes and miscommunication. But during the trial, an actor like
Manson might get so isolated by circumstance that he could not keep up with the important script
updates. This is why he needed private meetings with Bugliosi.

mileswmathis.com/tate.pdf
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: novum, Orangeaid

Crowley, luciferianism and the dark 'arts' in the entertainment industry 11 Apr 2015 21:12 #4

  • rodin
  • rodin's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Spam Killer
  • BELIEF IS THE ENEMY OF TRUTH
  • Posts: 4861
  • Likes received: 1818
Dovetails with Laurel Canyon / Dave McGowan

I wonder where Sharon Tate, Jim Morrison et al retired to?
To understand who rules over you look to whom you tube can't criticise

The media isn't there to cover the news
It's there to cover the news up

All establishment lies pass through three stages
First, they are accepted as being self evident
Second, they are exposed by diligent research
Third, they are enforced

"Communism is the bloodiest, most difficult and the most terrible way from capitalism to capitalism" from Under the Sign of the Scorpion by Juri Lina
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Crowley, luciferianism and the dark 'arts' in the entertainment industry 12 Apr 2015 15:56 #5

  • annabelle
  • annabelle's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 2618
  • Likes received: 1740




Why does she appear to have a little smile on her face?

Too difficult to find and upload a few of the photos in this article, did it already and because of one photo being 'forbidden' lost the whole post. :( I have thought these alleged murders at the Tate house were ritual killings but now have very strong doubts that anyone was killed at that location. Far too many red flags pointing to staging of the entire epic farce..

Speaking of Dave McGowan's Laurel Canyon series.... the location of the Tate house really ties in.
Well, not many people know this, but just across that little
valley behind Sharon in both pictures is a large hill called Lookout Mountain. First there is Franklin
Canyon, then a little neighborhood, then Lookout Mountain, and behind the mountain is Laurel Canyon
Boulevard
. Well, until 1969 there was a secret Air Force facility on the mountain, called Lookout
Mountain Air Force Station. Again, not a conspiracy theory, you can see it on Wikipedia. The station is
now a private residence on Wonderland Avenue, according to the page there. Curious that the station is
said to have closed in 1969, don't you think? Guess what this facility specialized in? Take the Wiki link
and you will see that they specialized in making movies.

The studio consisted of a complete stage, 2 screening rooms, a helicopter landing pad, a bomb
shelter and 17 climate controlled film vaults as well as two underground parking garages. With the
latest equipment the studio could process both 35 mm and 16 mm motion pictures as well as optical
prints and still photographs. The studio contained staff from many prominent studios alongside its
military staff. Civilian personnel from Warner Brothers, Metro-Goldwyn Mayer and RKO Pictures
worked at the studio in functions such as producers, cameramen and directors. Peter G. Kuran
worked at Lookout Mountain before going on to an award-winning career involving both directing and
visual effects work
. In some cases, Kuran has brought footage of atomic tests developed at Lookout
Mountain directly to his later work.

“Visual effects work.” Interesting. Also take special note of that last studio. Remember, I reminded you
above that Joseph Kennedy owned RKO. That fact may or may not be a central clue in this paper, but it
will be in an upcoming paper.

Lookout Mountain produced over 19,000 films, more than all Hollywood studios combined. Stars like
John Ford, Jimmy Stewart, Howard Hawks, Ronald Reagan, Bing Crosby, Walt Disney and Marilyn
Monroe were given clearance to work at the facility on undisclosed projects
. The facility wasn't admitted
to exist until the 1990's, which tends to disprove the old saw that you can't keep anything that big secret.
Almost no one knows of it even now.

I want to be sure you noticed that bolded name above: Ronald Reagan. The man who had been an actor
at Lookout Mountain was Governor of California in 1969. That isn't a coincidence.

Strange that we can't see a hill behind Sharon in pic 1. We are looking back toward Burbank and
Universal City, so Lookout Mountain should be in the background. I suggest that Lookout Mountain was
used as a center of operation for the Tate events, and that there was a direct line of sight from the station
to the house, using a telescope
. To keep anyone from studying that possibility, someone decided to
reformat pic 1, using a retouched background. One of the side-effects of that retouching was that both
Sharon's and the dog's hair turned black: probably a contrast error.

It may interest you to know that telescopes were a part of the mainstream story. Manson is said to have
stolen a green telescope from Terry Melcher's Malibu house. Ed Sanders says, “It was Doris Day's
telescope that the family used in scanning for Black Panther raids from the Santa Susanna hilltops.”
Right, Ed. Although that story scans poorly, it is useful as a reminder to us that telescopes could be used
to coordinate and check on events in these hilly neighborhoods, in a time before cell phones.

That's the house on Cielo as seen from the front, looking at it from the east (view photo in link). The Tate house isn't quite on
top of the hill, but almost. We are seeing the front yard. Sharon with her dog was in the front yard. That
is where the view is. The back yard is very narrow and you see only the hill. Then there is a long side yard
where the pool is, to the left in this photo. So from Lookout Mountain, this is basically what you would
see. Notice there are no fences or hedges blocking the view, even from where this picture was taken. You
can see the front door and the front windows.

Another red flag is the famous box 65, a box of evidence supposedly found at the Folger/Frykowski house
by investigators. The rumor was spread that it contained erotic photographs of many of Hollywood's
elite. No one asks why or how Folger or Frykowski would have such photographs, but the rumor was
enough to keep a lot of people quiet, apparently. Although the photos never existed, this story was a great
sidebar to the main story, and brilliantly shortened the leash of a great number of people who were
already controlled.

And yet another red flag:

Later the police backed up a van to the Polanski house and carted a truckload of stuff down to SID headquarters for
examination. A few days later they evidently brought most of it back and placed it in the same order to try to recreate the
original undisturbed crime scene.15

Again, illogical, unprecedented, and totally against policy. The only reason they would do this is if they
were scrubbing the scene of unwanted evidence, and planting other evidence. In the chaos of the move
and return move, absolutely anything could be achieved.

And yet another red flag, on the same page as the ones above: the eyeglasses that were found by the blue
trunks were given to Paul Tate, “who held them for two weeks trying to locate the owner, who would have
been a prime suspect.”16 You have to be kidding me. No one thought this was odd? Is it common practice
in a police investigation to give or loan evidence to a family member of one of the victims? Of course not.
It is just more proof that military intelligence had access to not only the crime scene but also the artifacts
in it. If any discrepancy arose, Paul Tate was there to fix it.

And another red flag: although the managers of the story were leaking it to the press chapters at a time,
when it came time to report to the State Bureau of Criminal Identification and Investigation, the LAPD
sent only a three-line homicide report, barely complying with the law requiring a filing. This is just an
indication of who the managers of the story really were: only the Feds would have such undisguised
contempt for a State Bureau.

The date of final capture (the final arrests at the Spahn movie ranch of the Manson family) was already set in the script: October 12, Aleister Crowley's birthday.




I got both those photos off the web.** They are freely available and I didn't do anything to them in
photoshop. The first one is much more prominent on the web, and it is likely to be the first one you find
on a websearch. That is the one they want you to see. But the second one is also out there.

You see the lengths they had to go to, to make the photo look bad. They have really cheated, and that
should be the first red flag. If the crime scene photos really did the job they wanted them to do, they
wouldn't have to cheat and red them up, would they? Their problem is obvious: in the real photo, she
doesn't look nearly bad enough. She doesn't even look dead. Her skin has color, she is smiling, and there
is actually way too little blood.

This is many hours after the murders, we are told. The murders are said to
have taken place around midnight, and these photos were taken at least 10 to 12 hours later. She should
look awful. She shouldn't have any color, her mouth shouldn't look like that, and the chest wounds
should simply be caked with blood. The coroner's report claimed lividity on the left side of her head, but
we see none here. What is lividity? Lividity (also known as livor mortis) is bruising caused by blood
pooling inside the body. It should be on the high side here, but it isn't.

We will see that she was found by the couch: why is she against a white wall here, turned completely over?
You don't normally move corpses at a crime scene, just to photograph them from other angles. If she is
dead, why does she need a pillow? Why is she smiling? That isn't rigor mortis. Rigor mortis doesn't
make you smile in a natural way, like that, fluid and lovely. Rigor mortis tightens your lips in a ghastly
unnatural-looking grimace. Rigor mortis is worst at 12 hours after death. Look it up. These crime scene
photos were taken roughly at the time, so rigor should be at a maximum. And yet her face and mouth and
eyes look completely natural and alive.

We can also study the arms, as more proof that something is very wrong here. Before they moved her, her
original position was by the couch, and her upper arm was over her head. In the photo above, they have
flipped her on her other side, so the top arm is now on the bottom. But it is no longer over her head, as
you see. It is out to the side. In her original position, her bicep was right on her ear. Here, it is a foot
away. No problem if you are alive, but if you are dead and in the maximum hours of rigor mortis, it is a
big problem. Whoever has moved her couldn't just move that arm to suit themselves.

We see no sign of livor mortis either, which also peaks at about 12 hours. Except for the traces of fake
blood, Tate has no skin discoloration either top of bottom of her torso or head. She should be whiter
where her torso is high and purpler underneath. Since they have flipped her over, she should be purple
on the high side. She isn't. Nor does she have pallor mortis, which would be there even if rigor hadn't set
in. She isn't pale. In short, she doesn't look dead by any normal standards, and only people who had
never seen a real corpse would think she is dead.

mileswmathis.com/tate.pdf

I do appear to have gone quite off-topic in my own thread but hope to bring it around to the present as these events are part of a narrative still going on today.
Last Edit: 12 Apr 2015 16:08 by annabelle.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Orangeaid

Crowley, luciferianism and the dark 'arts' in the entertainment industry 12 Apr 2015 16:06 #6

  • Orangeaid
  • Orangeaid's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 11634
  • Likes received: 8018
Polanski was a Polish Jew who had also just finished Rosemary's Baby at the time of the "murders". Rosemary was played by Mia Farrow, former wife of untouchable Jewish pedophile Woody Allen.
Roman Polanski (born Rajmund Roman Thierry Polański; 18 August 1933) is a Polish and, since 1976, naturalized-French[1] film director, producer, writer, and actor. Having made films in Poland, the United Kingdom, France and the United States, he is considered one of the few "truly international filmmakers."[2] Polanski's films have inspired diverse directors, including the Coen brothers,[3] Wes Anderson,[4] David Fincher,[5] Atom Egoyan,[6] Darren Aronofsky,[7] Park Chan-wook,[8] Sean Durkin,[9] Abel Ferrara,[10] and Wes Craven.[11]

Born in Paris to Polish parents, he moved with his family back to Poland (Second Polish Republic) in 1937, shortly before the outbreak of World War II.[12] He survived the Holocaust and was educated in Poland (People's Republic of Poland) and became a director of both art house and commercial films.[13] Polanski's first feature-length film, Knife in the Water (1962), made in Poland, was nominated for a United States Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film but was beaten by Federico Fellini's 8½.[14] He has since received five more Oscar nominations, along with two Baftas, four Césars, a Golden Globe Award and the Palme d'Or of the Cannes Film Festival in France. In the United Kingdom he directed three films, beginning with Repulsion (1965). In 1968 he moved to the United States, and cemented his status by directing the horror film Rosemary's Baby (1968) for which Ruth Gordon won an Academy Award as Best Supporting Actress.

In 1969, Polanski's pregnant wife, Sharon Tate, was murdered by members of the Manson Family while staying at Polanski's Benedict Canyon home above Los Angeles.[15] Following Tate's death, Polanski returned to Europe and spent much of his time in Paris and Gstaad, but did not direct another film until Macbeth (1971) in England. The following year he went to Italy to make What? (1973) and subsequently spent the next five years living near Rome. However, he travelled to Hollywood to direct Chinatown (1974). The film was nominated for eleven Academy Awards, and was a critical and box-office success.[16] Polanski's next film, The Tenant (1976), was shot in France, and completed the "Apartment Trilogy", following Repulsion and Rosemary's Baby.[17]

Polanski fled the USA after drugging and anally raping a 13 yr old girl at the house of kabbalah witch Angelica Huston. A crime he has never faced justice for ... and which "black Jew" whoopi Goldberg described as "not rape, rape".
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: annabelle

Crowley, luciferianism and the dark 'arts' in the entertainment industry 12 Apr 2015 16:52 #7

  • annabelle
  • annabelle's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 2618
  • Likes received: 1740
Yes I do remember reading an unnamed insider writing that Roman Polanski is the head of a very powerful coven and is very protected by powerful people, no way to verify the source. Tatem 0'neal's book implicated that he never stopped going after young girls sexually in the years after he fled the U.S. on charges of drugging and raping an under-aged girl.
Over 100 In Film Community Sign Polanski Petition

AFP is reporting that a grand assembly of filmmakers, actors and producers from around the world have signed a petition urging the release of director Roman Polanski, who was arrested Sunday in Switzerland on a warrant for a 1977 underage sex case in the United States. Woody Allen, Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu, Martin Scorcese, David Lynch, Wong Kar Wai, Harmony Korine, Stephen Frears, Alexander Payne, Michael Mann, Wim Wenders, Tilda Swinton, Julian Schnabel, and Pedro Almodovar are among the 100 and counting film industry figures who have signed the petition, coordinated from France by the SACD, an organization which represents performance and visual artists.

"We demand the immediate release of Roman Polanski," urges the petition. "Film-makers in France, in Europe, in the United States and around the world are dismayed by this decision... It seems inadmissible to them that an international cultural event, paying homage to one of the greatest contemporary film-makers, is used by police to apprehend him."

The following is the SACD petition, followed by a list of names of people who had signed it as of tonight. For a more extensive detailing of Polanski's arrest and potential extradition to the United States, check out indieWIRE's

indieWIRE's coverage from earlier today.

Petition for Roman Polanski

We have learned the astonishing news of Roman Polanski's arrest by the Swiss police on September 26th, upon arrival in Zurich (Switzerland) while on his way to a film festival where he was due to receive an award for his career in filmmaking.

His arrest follows an American arrest warrant dating from 1978 against the filmmaker, in a case of morals.

Filmmakers in France, in Europe, in the United States and around the world are dismayed by this decision. It seems inadmissible to them that an international cultural event, paying homage to one of the greatest contemporary filmmakers, is used by the police to apprehend him.

By their extraterritorial nature, film festivals the world over have always permitted works to be shown and for filmmakers to present them freely and safely, even when certain States opposed this.

The arrest of Roman Polanski in a neutral country, where he assumed he could travel without hindrance, undermines this tradition: it opens the way for actions of which no one can know the effects.

Roman Polanski is a French citizen, a renown and international artist now facing extradition. This extradition, if it takes place, will be heavy in consequences and will take away his freedom.

Filmmakers, actors, producers and technicians -- everyone involved in international filmmaking -- want him to know that he has their support and friendship.

On September 16th, 2009, Mr. Charles Rivkin, the US Ambassador to France, received French artists and intellectuals at the embassy. He presented to them the new Minister Counselor for Public Affairs at the embassy, Ms Judith Baroody. In perfect French she lauded the Franco-American friendship and recommended the development of cultural relations between our two countries.

If only in the name of this friendship between our two countries, we demand the immediate release of Roman Polanski.

-For a list of signatories, continue to the next page.-

Polanski petition signatories, as of September 29th:

Fatih Akin
Stephane Allagnon
Woody Allen
Pedro Almodovar
Wes Anderson
Jean-Jacques Annaud
Alexandre Arcady
Fanny Ardant
Asia Argento
Darren Aronofsky
Olivier Assayas
Alexander Astruc
Gabriel Auer
Luc Barnier
Christophe Barratier
Xavier Beauvois
Liria Begeja
Gilles Behat
Jean-Jacques Beineix
Marco Bellochio
Monica Bellucci
Djamel Bennecib
Giuseppe Bertolucci
Patrick Bouchitey
Paul Boujenah
Jacques Bral
Patrick Braoudé
Andre Buytaers
Christian Carion
Henning Carlsen
Jean-Michel Carre
Patrice Chereau
Elie Chouraqui
Souleymane Cisse
Alain Corneau
Jerome Cornuau
Miguel Courtois
Dominique Crevecoeur
Alfonso Cuaron
Luc et Jean-Pierre Dardenne
Jonathan Demme
Alexandre Desplat
Rosalinde et Michel Deville
Georges Dybman
Jacques Fansten
Joël Farges
Gianluca Farinelli
Jacques Fansten
Etienne Faure
Michel Ferry
Scott Foundas
Stephen Frears
Thierry Fremaux
Sam Gabarski
René Gainville
Tony Gatlif
Costa Gavras
Jean-Marc Ghanassia
Terry Gilliam
Christian Gion
Marc Guidoni
Buck Henry
David Heyman
Laurent Heynemann
Robert Hossein
Jean-Loup Hubert
Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu
Gilles Jacob
Just Jaeckin
Alain Jessua
Pierre Jolivet
Kent Jones
Roger Kahane,
Nelly Kaplan
Wong Kar Waï
Ladislas Kijno
Harmony Korine
Jan Kounen
Diane Kurys
Emir Kusturica
John Landis
Claude Lanzmann
André Larquié
Vinciane Lecocq
Patrice Leconte
Claude Lelouch
Gérard Lenne
David Lynch
Michael Mann
François Margolin
Jean-Pierre Marois
Tonie Marshall
Mario Martone
Nicolas Mauvernay
Radu Mihaileanu
Claude Miller
Mario Monicelli
Jeanne Moreau
Sandra Nicolier
Michel Ocelot
Alexander Payne
Richard Pena
Michele Placido
Philippe Radault
Jean-Paul Rappeneau
Raphael Rebibo
Yasmina Reza
Jacques Richard
Laurence Roulet
Walter Salles
Jean-Paul Salomé
Marc Sandberg
Jerry Schatzberg
Julian Schnabel
Barbet Schroeder
Ettore Scola
Martin Scorcese
Charlotte Silvera
Abderrahmane Sissako
Paolo Sorrentino
Guillaume Stirn
Tilda Swinton
Jean-Charles Tacchella
Radovan Tadic
Danis Tanovic
Bertrand Tavernier
Cécile Telerman
Alain Terzian
Pascal Thomas
Giuseppe Tornatore
Serge Toubiana
Nadine Trintignant
Tom Tykwer
Alexandre Tylski
Betrand Van Effenterre
Wim Wenders

www.indiewire.com/article/over_100_in_film_community_sign_polanski_petition

Disgusing isn't it. :mad:

Roman Polanski's Rosemary's Baby
Last Edit: 12 Apr 2015 17:51 by annabelle.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Crowley, luciferianism and the dark 'arts' in the entertainment industry 12 Apr 2015 19:07 #8

  • Cinta
  • Cinta's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Never Again
  • ''None are more hopelessly enslaved,than those who falsely believe they are free
  • Posts: 5333
  • Likes received: 1066
Malila wrote:




Why does she appear to have a little smile on her face?

Too difficult to find and upload a few of the photos in this article, did it already and because of one photo being 'forbidden' lost the whole post. :( I have thought these alleged murders at the Tate house were ritual killings but now have very strong doubts that anyone was killed at that location. Far too many red flags pointing to staging of the entire epic farce..

Speaking of Dave McGowan's Laurel Canyon series.... the location of the Tate house really ties in.
Well, not many people know this, but just across that little
valley behind Sharon in both pictures is a large hill called Lookout Mountain. First there is Franklin
Canyon, then a little neighborhood, then Lookout Mountain, and behind the mountain is Laurel Canyon
Boulevard
. Well, until 1969 there was a secret Air Force facility on the mountain, called Lookout
Mountain Air Force Station. Again, not a conspiracy theory, you can see it on Wikipedia. The station is
now a private residence on Wonderland Avenue, according to the page there. Curious that the station is
said to have closed in 1969, don't you think? Guess what this facility specialized in? Take the Wiki link
and you will see that they specialized in making movies.

The studio consisted of a complete stage, 2 screening rooms, a helicopter landing pad, a bomb
shelter and 17 climate controlled film vaults as well as two underground parking garages. With the
latest equipment the studio could process both 35 mm and 16 mm motion pictures as well as optical
prints and still photographs. The studio contained staff from many prominent studios alongside its
military staff. Civilian personnel from Warner Brothers, Metro-Goldwyn Mayer and RKO Pictures
worked at the studio in functions such as producers, cameramen and directors. Peter G. Kuran
worked at Lookout Mountain before going on to an award-winning career involving both directing and
visual effects work
. In some cases, Kuran has brought footage of atomic tests developed at Lookout
Mountain directly to his later work.

“Visual effects work.” Interesting. Also take special note of that last studio. Remember, I reminded you
above that Joseph Kennedy owned RKO. That fact may or may not be a central clue in this paper, but it
will be in an upcoming paper.

Lookout Mountain produced over 19,000 films, more than all Hollywood studios combined. Stars like
John Ford, Jimmy Stewart, Howard Hawks, Ronald Reagan, Bing Crosby, Walt Disney and Marilyn
Monroe were given clearance to work at the facility on undisclosed projects
. The facility wasn't admitted
to exist until the 1990's, which tends to disprove the old saw that you can't keep anything that big secret.
Almost no one knows of it even now.

I want to be sure you noticed that bolded name above: Ronald Reagan. The man who had been an actor
at Lookout Mountain was Governor of California in 1969. That isn't a coincidence.

Strange that we can't see a hill behind Sharon in pic 1. We are looking back toward Burbank and
Universal City, so Lookout Mountain should be in the background. I suggest that Lookout Mountain was
used as a center of operation for the Tate events, and that there was a direct line of sight from the station
to the house, using a telescope
. To keep anyone from studying that possibility, someone decided to
reformat pic 1, using a retouched background. One of the side-effects of that retouching was that both
Sharon's and the dog's hair turned black: probably a contrast error.

It may interest you to know that telescopes were a part of the mainstream story. Manson is said to have
stolen a green telescope from Terry Melcher's Malibu house. Ed Sanders says, “It was Doris Day's
telescope that the family used in scanning for Black Panther raids from the Santa Susanna hilltops.”
Right, Ed. Although that story scans poorly, it is useful as a reminder to us that telescopes could be used
to coordinate and check on events in these hilly neighborhoods, in a time before cell phones.

That's the house on Cielo as seen from the front, looking at it from the east (view photo in link). The Tate house isn't quite on
top of the hill, but almost. We are seeing the front yard. Sharon with her dog was in the front yard. That
is where the view is. The back yard is very narrow and you see only the hill. Then there is a long side yard
where the pool is, to the left in this photo. So from Lookout Mountain, this is basically what you would
see. Notice there are no fences or hedges blocking the view, even from where this picture was taken. You
can see the front door and the front windows.

Another red flag is the famous box 65, a box of evidence supposedly found at the Folger/Frykowski house
by investigators. The rumor was spread that it contained erotic photographs of many of Hollywood's
elite. No one asks why or how Folger or Frykowski would have such photographs, but the rumor was
enough to keep a lot of people quiet, apparently. Although the photos never existed, this story was a great
sidebar to the main story, and brilliantly shortened the leash of a great number of people who were
already controlled.

And yet another red flag:

Later the police backed up a van to the Polanski house and carted a truckload of stuff down to SID headquarters for
examination. A few days later they evidently brought most of it back and placed it in the same order to try to recreate the
original undisturbed crime scene.15

Again, illogical, unprecedented, and totally against policy. The only reason they would do this is if they
were scrubbing the scene of unwanted evidence, and planting other evidence. In the chaos of the move
and return move, absolutely anything could be achieved.

And yet another red flag, on the same page as the ones above: the eyeglasses that were found by the blue
trunks were given to Paul Tate, “who held them for two weeks trying to locate the owner, who would have
been a prime suspect.”16 You have to be kidding me. No one thought this was odd? Is it common practice
in a police investigation to give or loan evidence to a family member of one of the victims? Of course not.
It is just more proof that military intelligence had access to not only the crime scene but also the artifacts
in it. If any discrepancy arose, Paul Tate was there to fix it.

And another red flag: although the managers of the story were leaking it to the press chapters at a time,
when it came time to report to the State Bureau of Criminal Identification and Investigation, the LAPD
sent only a three-line homicide report, barely complying with the law requiring a filing. This is just an
indication of who the managers of the story really were: only the Feds would have such undisguised
contempt for a State Bureau.

The date of final capture (the final arrests at the Spahn movie ranch of the Manson family) was already set in the script: October 12, Aleister Crowley's birthday.




I got both those photos off the web.** They are freely available and I didn't do anything to them in
photoshop. The first one is much more prominent on the web, and it is likely to be the first one you find
on a websearch. That is the one they want you to see. But the second one is also out there.

You see the lengths they had to go to, to make the photo look bad. They have really cheated, and that
should be the first red flag. If the crime scene photos really did the job they wanted them to do, they
wouldn't have to cheat and red them up, would they? Their problem is obvious: in the real photo, she
doesn't look nearly bad enough. She doesn't even look dead. Her skin has color, she is smiling, and there
is actually way too little blood.

This is many hours after the murders, we are told. The murders are said to
have taken place around midnight, and these photos were taken at least 10 to 12 hours later. She should
look awful. She shouldn't have any color, her mouth shouldn't look like that, and the chest wounds
should simply be caked with blood. The coroner's report claimed lividity on the left side of her head, but
we see none here. What is lividity? Lividity (also known as livor mortis) is bruising caused by blood
pooling inside the body. It should be on the high side here, but it isn't.

We will see that she was found by the couch: why is she against a white wall here, turned completely over?
You don't normally move corpses at a crime scene, just to photograph them from other angles. If she is
dead, why does she need a pillow? Why is she smiling? That isn't rigor mortis. Rigor mortis doesn't
make you smile in a natural way, like that, fluid and lovely. Rigor mortis tightens your lips in a ghastly
unnatural-looking grimace. Rigor mortis is worst at 12 hours after death. Look it up. These crime scene
photos were taken roughly at the time, so rigor should be at a maximum. And yet her face and mouth and
eyes look completely natural and alive.

We can also study the arms, as more proof that something is very wrong here. Before they moved her, her
original position was by the couch, and her upper arm was over her head. In the photo above, they have
flipped her on her other side, so the top arm is now on the bottom. But it is no longer over her head, as
you see. It is out to the side. In her original position, her bicep was right on her ear. Here, it is a foot
away. No problem if you are alive, but if you are dead and in the maximum hours of rigor mortis, it is a
big problem. Whoever has moved her couldn't just move that arm to suit themselves.

We see no sign of livor mortis either, which also peaks at about 12 hours. Except for the traces of fake
blood, Tate has no skin discoloration either top of bottom of her torso or head. She should be whiter
where her torso is high and purpler underneath. Since they have flipped her over, she should be purple
on the high side. She isn't. Nor does she have pallor mortis, which would be there even if rigor hadn't set
in. She isn't pale. In short, she doesn't look dead by any normal standards, and only people who had
never seen a real corpse would think she is dead.

mileswmathis.com/tate.pdf

I do appear to have gone quite off-topic in my own thread but hope to bring it around to the present as these events are part of a narrative still going on today.

I came across these pictures



This kind of disgusting and disrespectful behaviour is condoned here

ORANGEAID verbal abuse

''Cinta is a whore.
I don't change one word I've said.''

truth-zone.net/forum/members-area/67105-open-up-the-clarity-zone-to-all-tz-members-we-need-transparency-and-not-secrecy.html?start=80#209733
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Crowley, luciferianism and the dark 'arts' in the entertainment industry 12 Apr 2015 20:22 #9

  • annabelle
  • annabelle's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 2618
  • Likes received: 1740
I had those photos in my original post before I lost the whole thing and they are in the link to the article and discussed as well . :thumbup: I just didn't want to have to do it all over again since they are in the link. and I can't upload the photos directly from the article. It would be a bit tiring to have to do it again. Concerning the photos you posted that are in the linked article under the 'crime scene' section if you scroll down:


Here is the main photo, and it looks a little bad if you don't know it is a movie. But even though the fake
blood is pretty gross, she actually looks way too good. Her pose is entirely too supple for a corpse in rigor.
You don't see corpses in languid poses like that. Most often, a corpse left on its side like that will develop
a strange lift in an arm or leg, so that it floats off the ground. Corpses don't take languid sleeping poses
like these two.

And why is Sebring's head covered? If they are moving corpses around, you would think
they could at least remove that handkerchief or whatever it is, so that we could identify him. As it is, I
would suggest they covered his face because it isn't him—he was tired of lying there. Or because he
couldn't keep a straight face. Like Tate, he was prone to laugh or smile, and his smile was even worse than
hers. Best to cover it.

Also, you can see how lovely her skin looks there, with no pallor, no livor, and no rigor. Most of the
copies you will find of this photo on the internet have been manipulated to make her skin look worse.
Another problem with this photo is the shine on her arm. It took me a while to notice that, but it is a red
flag as well. It is a sign of moisture, of course. See how her arm nearest you shines? It shines because it is
wet. But how can the blood still be wet 10-12 hours after the murders? It should have long since dried.

You will say that is because this picture was taken earlier, and that is why she doesn't show rigor or livor or
pallor. Problem there is that these crime scene photos are assumed to have been taken by the police
photographer, who could not have gotten there before about 10am. If we go back to a time before that—
when the blood might still be wet—we have to ask who is taking the pictures? They were all supposed to
be dead. Any photos earlier than 10am are proof of a film set and a crew.

In some of the death photos, she has no bra on: she is naked. We are told this one is from the coroner's
table.

(photo in article has red arrow pointing to neck)

Does that look real? Why is the body less exposed than the head? What's wrong with her neck? It isn't
large enough for her head. The worst piece-job is where I have drawn the red arrow. No neck line has a
sharp angle like that. This is about the worst fake photo I have ever seen. I can't believe they released it.
Let's put it side by side with the previous photo.




The first problem I see in the comparison is that her head is too long in the first photo. Look how long
her nose and upper lip are. Death can't stretch your head, moving your mouth and eyes farther apart. In
manipulating the photo, trying to put that head on that body, the technician somehow stretched the
head. The first photo is faked using the second photo as a reference and source. You can tell that
whoever faked it stole the top eye from the second photo, importing it into the first photo. It is exactly
the same, down to the shadows. But he put it in too high, making the face look longer.

He also got the face wounds in the wrong place. In the first photo she has two cheek wounds about 2 inches apart, with
the lower wound starting about 1.5 inches beyond the corner of her mouth. In the second photo, she has
one cheek wound, and it starts right at the corner of her mouth. He also copied the chest wounds, since it
was very important that those match. But he didn't get those right, either. It also looks like he copied the
body, just removing the bra. The position of the torso is the same.

Now, what about that tag, which says R. Wilson? Who is R. Wilson? The coroner? An unknown Beach
Boy? The coroner doesn't normally tag his bodies with his name. You tag bodies with their own name,
for pretty obvious reasons. We should see a tag that says Sharon Tate or Sharon Polanski. Besides, the
chief medical examiner, who did the autopsies, was Thomas Noguchi, not R. Wilson. A guy named Stuart
was the deputy coroner. I would suggest this plate isn't a body tag, it is a cover that the photo faker
needed to cover his worst area.

You often see strange things like this on photos where one head is pasted
on another body. Since the seam is pretty obvious, the faker will put a tie there or a necklace or a collar or
something. You see that the plate goes up very high, in an odd way. He has covered most of his bad seam.
But he really needed to cover that sharp angle that I pointed to with my red arrow.

Before we proceed, let's take a quick look at Thomas Noguchi. You may be interested to know that
Noguchi also did the autopsies for Robert Kennedy, Marilyn Monroe, Natalie Wood, William Holden, and
John Belushi. To say he is suspicious is a huge understatement. A researcher could write an entire book
on Noguchi, exposing him as a fraud. I don't have the time or inclination to do that, so I will only
mention a couple of things. One, it is known that Noguchi's deputy coroner at the time, Donald Angus
Stuart, was a fraud. He was arrested in 1972 for forging his medical degree, practicing without a license,
and perjury.

The perjury stemmed from his testimony in court against Noguchi. There were Civil Service
Commission hearings on Noguchi in 1969, and Stuart gave testimony against Noguchi. Noguchi had
been fired by the LA Board of Supervisors on March 18, 1969, on a 5-0 vote. However, Noguchi ended up
being reinstated by the federal CSC on July 31, 1969, and Stuart was arrested much later. Note that date.
Noguchi was reinstated just one week before the alleged Tate murders. Also notice that Noguchi was
reinstated by the Feds, over the 5-0 of the local authorities.

During this fracas, Noguchi was lambasted by court testimony, including this:

Deputy LA County Counsel Martin Weekes alleged [in court] that a smiling Noguchi danced in his office while waiting for
Kennedy to die and told associates, "I am going to be famous! I hope he dies, because... then my international reputation
will be established." A secretary described Noguchi slashing a piece of paper in two with a penknife and telling her he'd like
to perform a live autopsy on [county chief administrator] Lin Hollinger.

In addition, Hollinger stated in testimony against Noguchi that “he was in need of psychiatric care,
stemming from apparent use of drugs.” And of course we have the report I linked above, in which his own
deputy coroner Stuart testified Noguchi was unstable [San Francisco Examiner, Feb. 3, 1972]. This is the
man that was reinstated just one week before the alleged Tate murders by the CSC, supposedly due to
race-baiting. The Civil Service Commission reinstated Noguchi, giving the appearance of doing so
because they were afraid of firing an Asian-American. Noguchi and his supporters decided to lead with
the defense that he was being fired for being Asian, and it worked.

Eventually, despite the fame he did find, he was fired in 1982 and no Civil Service Commission could save
him that time. By then he had botched or falsified the deaths of William Holden, Natalie Wood, John
Belushi, and many others—most, we assume, on orders from above. Anyone who has researched any
major murders or famous deaths knows that coroners are hired to follow official stories, not to do real
autopsies. The public is told what the federal authorities want it to know—no more, no less. If the CIA
tells a coroner to check the suicide box, he checks the suicide box. If the FBI tells him to discover an
accidental drowning, he discovers an accidental drowning. If he doesn't, the next accidental drowning
may be his own.

But back to the fake autopsy photos. Here is another one, with the head conveniently out of frame



So many problems there I don't know where to begin. No proof that is Sharon, since we can't see her face.
This “corpse” doesn't look 8.75 months pregnant, either. Maybe early pregnancy, maybe not, but eight
months is far bigger than that, and Sharon is far bigger than that in other photos we have seen. Sharon's
due date was August 18, 9 days after the alleged murder. Amazingly, the autopsy and death reports don't
mention a baby or pregnancy at all. Apparently, Noguchi didn't notice his corpse was pregnant.



If that is a real corpse, we are probably seeing normal corpse bloating, not pregnancy. Also a problem are
the wounds, which don't look like knife wounds. They are all round, as you see. Knife wounds make slits,
of course. Those wounds look like wounds from a shotgun. These wounds also don't match the main
photo of Sharon by the couch.

Remember, she had a big gash on the upper ribs in that one, which would
be the lower ribs in this photo. Here we only have two little pin pricks. The shotgun holes make me think
that Noguchi may have used old photos from the Rufus Wilson murders law.justia.com/cases/california/supreme-court/2d/66/749.html.

That would make this tag apply
to Mrs. R. Wilson, who was murdered in Los Angeles a few years earlier, by shotgun. The Rufus Wilson
autopsy photos would have been in the LA coroner's files.

It is also worth noting that when they show you the corpse with no head in the picture, you get great
picture quality. But when they show you the same corpse with the head in the picture, suddenly the
picture quality drops by 90%. That is a sure sign of tampering.




Why is the picture quality so good in the first photo but so poor in the second? Same day, same body,
same camera. What happened? Total eclipse of the Sun? Passing comet?



But let's return to the photos of Tate from the house. Here's another one of her by the couch, from
another angle. Again, they have jacked with the contrast and resolution, to make the photo look much
worse. You can't tell much from that, and that is how they want it. However, we do see more anomalies.
Look at the far upper left corner. We appear to have a strong line of blood there, or possibly a gash. If we
compare that to the main photo of her by the couch, it looks more like a short cut that is bleeding down.



But whatever it is, it is in a band that goes all the way across her torso, and that is about 3-5 inches under
her bra. So let's go to the good photo to take a look.



Since she is flipped, we should see the cut starting down by the rope and then running up. We can see a
clear 6-8 inches below the bra, and there is nothing there. Same with the coroner's photo. Nothing
there.

But back to the previous photos. Let's compare them side by side.




For a change of pace, let's study the rope and matchbooks. I don't know that anyone has ever done that.
In the second photo, her wrist is right on the rope, and there are several matchbooks between the rope
and the couch. [You may want to study the larger image above, to confirm that.] But no matchbook
beyond the rope, by her hand. Now go to the first photo. Her wrist is at least six inches from the rope,
and we see a matchbook beyond the rope, next to her hand. Now, the change in angles can affect this
greatly, I will admit. It is just possible her hand is blocking our view of the single matchbook, in photo 2.
However, the change in angles could not move the rope six inches, making it look like it is under her
wrist. The rope in picture 2 is clearly very near her wrist, and no change of angle could affect that greatly.
In picture 1, it is nowhere near her wrist.

She has moved! That position would be quite difficult to maintain for any length of time. Try it. Your
arm starts to go to sleep within minutes. She has shifted, and gone back to a similar but not identical
spot, relative to that rope.

mileswmathis.com/tate.pdf

There is more analysis of the crime scene photos in the link in the crime scene section.



Here's another clue from someone not completely comfortable with the game. We have been told this is a
reference to the police, whom the hippies called pigs. But knowing what we now know, we see it isn't that
at all. Since this is all fake blood, and since they commonly use pig's blood when they need blood that
looks very real—since it is real—we can now see that this writing is telling us what kind of blood the
writer has on his or her hands. Pig's blood. Pig.

mileswmathis.com/tate.pdf

:
Last Edit: 12 Apr 2015 23:40 by annabelle.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Orangeaid

Crowley, luciferianism and the dark 'arts' in the entertainment industry 13 Apr 2015 00:05 #10

  • annabelle
  • annabelle's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 2618
  • Likes received: 1740
I wanted to add this to go along with my opening post.
Malila wrote:

And yet another odd peculiarity is that James Franco is going to star and direct in an upcoming film called Beautiful People that is about hair stylist Jay Sebring. This biopic will include the (alleged.. possible false flag) murder of Sebring by the Manson family when they broke into the Tate residence at 10050 Cielo Drive and proceeded to slay in an abhorrent fashion. Add to that the occult basis of Wizard of Oz and author Frank L. Baum’s ties to the Theosophical Society, and it’s clear there are darker forces involved here.

Franco was also part of a Crowley ritual that took place in Los Angeles with Kenneth Anger and Noot Seear (Twilight: New Moon actress):



Also this Beautiful People theme crops up again with Marilyn Manson with a blatant anti-Christian theme



(performing same song here with Johnny Depp)


This Beautiful People theme connected with James Franco, Jay Sebring, the alleged Manson murders, Marilyn Manson and others is NOT a coincidence.


It’s widely known that Marilyn Manson came up with his stage name by combining the monikers of actress Marilyn Monroe and infamous convicted mass murderer Charles Manson. The two names were chosen by Marilyn Manson because he felt that the pair were the two biggest icons of the 1960s. Apparently, the shock rock icon is pretty infamous himself in the mind of Charles Manson, as a postcard from the prisoner to the rock star has been leaked online.

It seems as the name ‘Manson’ has come full circle from one infamous icon to the other. Although Charles Manson seems like a complete mental case, the notorious cult mastermind is one of the most quotable public figures in recent history. Some have even found deep meaning within the ‘ATWA’ philosophy of Charles Manson, which is an ecological mandate that stands for ‘Air, Trees, Water, Animals’ and/or ‘All The Way Alive.’

To Marilyn Manson –

It’s taken me a long time to get there from where I could touch M. Manson. Now I got a card to play – you may look into my non-profit, ATWA, and give Manson what you think he’s got coming for Air, Trees, Water, and you. Or I will pay Manson what you think Manson got coming – the music has make Manson into Abraxas Devil, and I’m SURE you would want some of what I got from what I got. It’s a far out balance. Beyond good and bad, right, wrong. What you don’t do is what I will do – what you did a sing-along, and let it roll and said how you saved me a lot of steps – I don’t need, it’s not a need or a want. Couped – coup. Ghost dancers slay together and you’re just in my grave Sunstroker Corona-coronas-coronae – you seen me from under with it all standing on me. That’s 2 dump trucks – doing the same as CMF 000007

Charles Manson



loudwire.com/charles-manson-writes-open-letter-to-marilyn-manson-from-prison/
Last Edit: 13 Apr 2015 00:24 by annabelle.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Related topics

Topic subjectRelevanceDate of latest post
PICTURE GALLERY - Christ Mocking Cult in the Entertainment Industry12.72Thursday, 27 July 2017
Aleister Crowley7.17Friday, 17 October 2014
LAM the ET and Crowley/Hubbard7.17Monday, 18 January 2016
Weaponizing the Arts7.17Sunday, 08 February 2015
Troothspoon's DIF/Crowley blog7.09Thursday, 06 December 2018
MMA ( Mixed Martial Arts)7.09Monday, 19 October 2020
The real Aleister Crowley7.09Saturday, 30 April 2016
Troothspoon's DIF/Crowley blog7.09Thursday, 06 December 2018
Martial Arts Movies7.09Tuesday, 31 December 2013
Did Ozzy and other rock groups really believe in the devil or was it all just entertainment to make money?6.95Tuesday, 03 May 2016
Moderators: novum, rodin, Flare
Powered by Kunena Forum

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it. Secure transactions via paypal.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2020 - May 2021, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 255 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 70 - Raised
( £ 53 GBP )
donation thermometer
21%
Most Recent Donation $50 USD
28th August 2020

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.