TOPIC: Why are some people Gay?

Hexhammer wrote:

Prejudice prejudice prejudice.
If you are happy with your state it's ok for me.
But if you were happy with your state you surely need not constantly complain about others
and invent insinuations.

www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/12/121211083212.htm


Gay animals prove that gay is natural

www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-human-beast/200906/gay-animals
www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-human-beast/200906/gay-animals

i-baster wrote:

Of course "gay" is somehow "natural", but the gay-agenda of your Freudian FRANKFURT SCHOOL friends is NOT natural

Do I have to post some CSD pigs ... uhm ... pics?

I do not attend this school you speak of.

i-baster wrote:

Funny? Deplorable!

You most obviously absorbed FRANKFURT SCHOOL INDOCTRINATION with your mother's milk.


EARLY SEXUALIZATION - Kinsey & Paedophile/Porn Agenda

TAVISTOCK - Brainwashing the World to Death

Why are some people gay?

Simple: Because they choose to be gay.

stolz wrote:
did you choose your sexuality?

thoreau wrote:
Yes.

Are you offended by the notion of 'Choice' Thoreau?

I can't speak for gays because I am not one, but I think being gay is a choice!

stolz wrote:
Nope I am a great believer in choice - I just havent talked to many people who believe they chose their sexuality.

I don't have any personal problems with gays, I mean if you like pipe, you like pipe....but, the grown men who prance around and act so flaming gay and talk with that lisp/ accent I'm like WTF?!?!

Why do all the flaming gays, no matter where you are, all use that same lisp/accent???? There are plenty of gays who are normal sounding...I just don't understand it

thoreau wrote:
Perhaps what you are trying to say is that you havent spoken to many people who remember choosing their sexuality.

Unless, of course, you are asserting that you believe humans are born with an active sexuality, and that children actually have sexual preferences?

stolz wrote:
Nope I mean that none of the gay nor straight people who I have talked to except for the mormon who 'chose' to be straight after some church based 'therapy' say that they chose their sexuality - I certainly didn't it just sort of appeared over time - one year I was all about pretending to be chewbacca the next year I wanted to snog boys - a few years later I found myself also attracted to women. Nowadays I am happily in a monogamous relationship with a most lovely man - who I have just asked whether he chose his sexuality and he said nope thats just how he is. I could just as easily be in a relationship with a woman but I fell in love with mr thoreau.

I do not think that children are born with an adult sense of sexuality - but I have been told and read that people have felt from a very early age that they were 'different' and that manifested itself in their sexuality as they reached puberty.

When did you chose? can you explain the process I am intrigued.

thoreau wrote:
Certainly.

It was early 1983, if I recall correctly, I was 7 years old. I was watching tv on a saturday morning when I caught sight of ZZ Top's music video for the song 'Legs'. I distinctly remember making a definitive choice to become decidely more aquainted with the female form and personality; I found it intriguing to say the least.

............ok, just kidding! I have no idea whatsoever when I chose heterosexuality as my sexual identity, but I have no doubts whatsoever that it was my choice. I believe everything after birth is a choice, be it based on pure necessity, or out of base instinct, I believe everything is out of choice.

The only phenomenon in life, that is not a product of your choice, is your birth.

I dont know why some gays have a hard time dealing with taking responsibility for their own choices, it's almost as if they are uncomfortable with being gay.

Natures idea of population control is my theory...and I don't think they get to choose...

Zephirop wrote:
I've heard this, but the thing is they're completely fertile? So I don't think this is it... Hermaphrodites, I could definitely believe this to be true for, as they are uniformly infertile.

And with the choice thing, certainly nobody gets to choose who they're attracted to, but they get to choose what to do about it, so in that sense being gay - e.g. actively being that way - is a choice, as one could choose to be celibate, or be with someone of the opposite sex even though there is no overt sexual attraction there - which is what virtually all homosexuals did until recently (or became priests/nuns).

I think it has psychological causes, rooted in disordered relationships with parents,particularly the mother. There may also be genetic predisposing factors, but like with most things, the nurture is more important than the nature.

thoreau wrote:
I tend to think it can be a bit of both, either, or a number of other variables. A small percentage of people may well be ''born gay'' or genetically wired to be that way inclined, others I think choose the lifestyle from learned behaviour. How many people are actually born gay so to speak? I don't know I'm not an expert, but there does seem to be a push towards indoctrinating young minds into thinking it's a completely healthy and natural way of life. Putting one's willy up somebody else's bum is not a healthy practice, no matter how much one tries to sugar coat it. Fine each to their own and all that, and what consenting adults do in private is really none of my concern, but don't teach young children that's it's healthy or natural. This is where they've over stepped the line, and this is what's causing a backlash in my view. I guess there's different levels of being gay, and I realise not all gay men are militant or depraved sado-masochists who shout it from the rooftops parading on the streets wearing leather gimp masks and gawd knows what else. I find these militant types very distasteful and disgusting, shamelessly doing this sort of thing in front of families and children is disgraceful, but some odd reason they are proud of their strange and bizarre fetishes, and look upon normal people as ''all hung up''.. and if you don't like them waving it in your faced you're called a bigot or intolerant. It's absurd.



Mummy, why is that man wearing a scary mask and why is he chained?

More alarmingly is some of these militant types work in the education system and such. Personally I don't think anybody who has these type of militant views should be allowed to work around children or have anything to do with the curriculum or educating children. Basically anybody with an agenda. We have enough depravity in society today, we don't need these degenerates telling children what is right and wrong, or rather telling them there's no such thing as wrong. I'm talking about extremists of course and not moderates. Gay rights have already been won. Now the main threat is the descent into something rather more degenerate. Homosexuality itself is no longer treated as a degenerate crime or a form of mental illness. Gays have achieved full equality under the law. Like any other group or individual, so why the push to rewrite the curriculum to educate young children? I realise they represent a variety of perspectives, they're not all fanatics whose appearance suggest they've escaped from a mental institution. I think it's militancy that people have a problem with, and not whether somebody is gay or not.

What Many Kids Saw at Toronto’s Pride Parade..




Today I went to see the gay parade in Toronto. It looked like there were fewer spectators than in the previous years, because it was much easier to find a clear spot near the barrier where I could take unobstructed photos. Next to me were two boys, who entertained themselves by spraying people with water guns. When the guns got empty, they ran somewhere to load them with water.

If their spot was taken after they returned, they pushed their way with “Excuse me!” said in a tone that was not ready to take a “no” for an answer. I guess according to the new TDSB rules that will qualify as bullying, but that’s what the normal boys do. Most people were laughing when the boys sprayed them; just one old transvestite scolded them for ruining his dress.

I mentioned them because they spent a long time watching the parade and many freaky people passed before their eyes. I am raising this point, because I am still wondering if the boys should’ve been there. Take a look at the picture – right in front of them is a guy with a huge beer belly wearing a ridiculous queer clown hat, a frilly short skirt and slippers, which even my grandmother would refuse to wear. I pity the fool who told that clown that he can look like a woman. At the opposite side of the sign you can see a topless woman.

According to the new crossdressing guidelines of TDSB, the exposure to “alternative” gender clothing is healthy. I see that concept didn’t work for the beer belly guy, but the boys, impressive at that age, may decide that it is cool to look like him.

There were probably thousands of kids at the parade and all of them saw at least several freaks. Here a baby is given the opportunity to explore the male anatomy:



At another spot, a bare-assed pervert is parading in front of a small boy:



There is nothing new here – at each and every gay parade a countless number of weirdos have exposed themselves in front of kids. The parades have always been marketed as family-friendly events. Now, just imagine that a bunch of heterosexuals decide to expose themselves in the same way. They would be arrested and sent to jail for lewd behaviour in no time. Of course, gays are above the law, above the society’s morals and (to use the words of Bernie Farber) it is not enough that we tolerate them, they must be celebrated. That’s why even the slightest criticism of homosexuality will label you a “homophobe”, one of the two deadly human rights commission sins.

TDSB also recommends in its homosexual curriculum that the school kids bring to school images from the gay parades to improve their understanding of diversity. As a public service, I am willing to provide a gallery of freaks the kids could choose from.





Just hanging out near the garbage





Of course, the Jewish gay organization Kulanu was there to oppose them with its own message:



There was a whole assortment of strange organizations taking part. No gay parade would be complete without the saboteurs of education in Toronto – TDSB. On their float they featured children’s drawings celebrating homosexual diversity (that was actually one of the ideas in the curriculum – to decorate a gay parade float). They found it necessary to advertise their “Challenging Class Bias” course designed for grade 7. And what’s the deal with that chalk remark “Gay=Level 4”?



It looks like comedy is not in high regard at TDSB (no wonder – humour is the first victim of political correctness):

Then I saw the city council, which is as bad as TDSB:



A bunch of queer Catholics also showed up – they’ll make sure that the church is destroyed in Ontario.



And of course the living dinosaurs from the Communist Party of Canada showed up to express their support.



www.blogwrath.com/gay-issues/what-many-kids-saw-at-torontos-pride-parade-2012/3103/

stolz wrote:
Responsibilities such as what?
It could just be, maybe, that after centuries of persecution by religious pressure & other people who have bought into such ideologies & believe that being gay is wrong, actually make them feel uncomfortable.

@ Zorro
None of the pictures you posted can be seen.


WHY ARE SOME PEOPLE GAY?

Some people are "gay" because they are afraid of vaginas, allergic of vaginas, or simply hate vaginas for no apparent reasons.
Others are just born misogynists, brainwashed/mind controlled to prefer deviating sexual practices, or they deliberately chose to be women haters.