Your donations are appreciated and help keep this site running. Even the smallest amount helps.
Thankyou

 
PROMOTE YOUR SITE
HERE
Only $3 USD/month
TRUTHSPOON.COM
The man they can't recruit!
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: Feminism - Empowerment or Oppression?

Feminism - Empowerment or Oppression? 11 Mar 2016 16:22 #41

  • GMP
  • GMP's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 3506
  • Likes received: 856
Strikes me that Zorro is probably terrified of women.
No biggie, from threads elsewhere on here, some of these right wing lads don't seem to be up to much in the 'man up' department.
It's obvious they are weaklings who can't protect their own folks.
Anyone who comes across as empowered must present a real threat to their self image.
Hence all their whining and handwringing about feminisms on here.
Last Edit: 11 Mar 2016 16:23 by GMP.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Feminism - Empowerment or Oppression? 11 Mar 2016 17:52 #42

  • Voltaire
  • Voltaire's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 3500
  • Likes received: 2086
Being terrified of a living person is allowable.

Being terrified of a blood oozing sausage is pathetic :joker:

please note the emoticon - just having fun. feel free to reply in kind :0


Truth is anti-semitic
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: GMP

Feminism - Empowerment or Oppression? 15 Mar 2016 16:03 #43

  • GMP
  • GMP's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 3506
  • Likes received: 856
Gotta fess up.
I am a pathetic-wimp in the face of blutwurst.
The very thought of it makes me feel bilious.
That said, I avoid red meat and butcher shop windows have a similar effect, especially those found East of Suez.
Fair comment Voltaire and no offence taken.
:)
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Feminism - Empowerment or Oppression? 17 Mar 2016 23:18 #44

  • Grolongo
  • Grolongo's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Junior Member
  • Posts: 773
  • Likes received: 626
Can anyone help me provide with details about this movement

Im aware of the Frankfurt school, the group who pushes this agenda, de real goal behind 'equality', the targets for this Marxist takeover

But I need names, dates, works of the key figures that changed the west so drasticly the past 70 years
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: GMP

Feminism - Empowerment or Oppression? 18 Mar 2016 02:44 #45

  • bd
  • bd's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • bikerdruid
  • Posts: 3658
  • Likes received: 471
un-fucking-believable.
zorro et al are clearly terrified of women.
did yiur mamas slap you too hard whilst burping you?
"From each according to his ability, to each according to his need."
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Feminism - Empowerment or Oppression? 18 Mar 2016 06:10 #46

  • peacenik
  • peacenik's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Immortal
  • Posts: 3144
  • Likes received: 1595
More and more I see, feminized men and macho women on television......and "no" it's NOT because they reflect the diverse population. There is an agenda afoot aimed at convincing the viewer that .feminized men and macho women are the norm
Birth is not a beginning; death is not an end. There is existence without limitation; there is continuity without a starting point.” ~ Chuang Tzu
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Exorcist

Feminism - Empowerment or Oppression? 18 Mar 2016 11:00 #47

  • ragnarok
  • ragnarok's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Gold Member
  • Posts: 7808
  • Likes received: 714
How much tv do you need to watch to pick up on this trend? I'm obviously not watching enough, because it wasn't something I'd noticed.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Feminism - Empowerment or Oppression? 18 Mar 2016 14:09 #48

  • GMP
  • GMP's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 3506
  • Likes received: 856
"Macho-Women", scary eh?
FFS lads, grow a pair.
LOL
:)
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: bd

Feminism - Empowerment or Oppression? 18 Mar 2016 18:35 #49

  • peacenik
  • peacenik's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Immortal
  • Posts: 3144
  • Likes received: 1595
ragnarok wrote:
How much tv do you need to watch to pick up on this trend? I'm obviously not watching enough, because it wasn't something I'd noticed.

I watch very little TV. You don't have to be a career TV viewer to see the agenda. Two nights ago I turn on the TV and there were two good examples, "American Family" and "Kristle"s (forgot the rest of the name}. But those are just two names of programs, I stumbled on w/o even searching.
Birth is not a beginning; death is not an end. There is existence without limitation; there is continuity without a starting point.” ~ Chuang Tzu
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Feminism - Empowerment or Oppression? 18 Mar 2016 18:43 #50

  • annabelle
  • annabelle's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 2441
  • Likes received: 1669
This whole 'feminism' thing gets my knickers in a twist :P ... the very term 'feminism' means a wide variety of different things to different people and it also depends on what era the person comes from, what class bracket and background. I am aware of the CIA underpinning/connections to certain leaders in the early 'feminism' movement and the agenda to get women out of the home and working as tax payers as a way to make additional profit and to have more ideological control over the family and children in their upbringing etc.. social engineering as always just as it was social engineering in the previous years to have a path laid out that was deemed the excepted path... to be born, be a good child, go to school, get married, be a good wife and mother, husband works to support the family for most of his life, retirement... and then death.

It didn't always work out that way though, if you were miserably married you were expected to suck it up for the rest of your life, sexual infidelity? suck it up... long term unhappiness due to incompatibility? suck it up...beatings? suck it up....child abuse within the family? don't say a word.....until death do you part.

The social engineering of the family changed to some extent during the war years because the men were off fighting and dying as pawns and cannon fodder by the millions during the 'war is a racket' agenda. Many of the women who were left behind to fend for themselves during the war years went to work (often in armaments factories and war related industries and jobs traditionally male predominated) and were encouraged to do so by TPTB to 'help their country' and to support themselves and their children if that was the case.

Anyways, men have been just as much a part of this social engineering in the way they think as women have yet the focus seems always to be on the negative social engineering of women and nought is said on the negative social engineering of men.

There were reasons for women to be upset, what options did they have then in life outside of a set path, similar to men as well except for such things as women did not have the right to vote (not that voting makes a difference because it doesn't in my books), women were not deemed to be 'a person' under the law until relatively recently in history in some places.

Here in Canada the Supreme Court of Canada rendered it's decision on Oct 18, 1927. The judges unanimously 'replied' that the word 'person' did not include female persons' and they also declined to define women as 'qualified persons', being that they were not 'persons' how could they be 'qualified persons'. It wasn't until Oct 18, 1929 that the Supreme Court of Canada was overruled and women were indeed declared to be 'persons'.

How would men have liked it if they were not deemed to even be 'persons'? and were deemed not to be 'persons' by a panel of 'highly esteemed' all female judges sitting in the Supreme Court.

In nineteenth century England, once a woman married, whatever property rights (goods, money or land) she took into her marriage or acquired subsequently was legally absorbed by her husband. Married women could not make wills or dispose of any property without her husbands consent. Marital separation, whether initiated by the husband or the wife, usually left the women economically destitute, as the law offered them no rights to marital property.

That is just one example as there as many.

Some of what is going on today, at least the bit that I see, is not what I would term 'feminism' but rather 'anti-feminism' in the name of 'feminism'... or 'anti-women' in the name of 'womanhood'... as if they speak for all....that is the encouraging of women to strip naked in the name of 'liberation' or whatever cause, the encouraging of women to degrade themselves and sexualize themselves openly and publicly.. that is part of a massive agenda to brainwash women to degrade themselves in the name of 'liberating' themselves' and it is something that some very well written early 'feminists' were very much vehemently opposed to. The social engineering part of the agenda has swung from condemning women who dared even think to dip their toes out of the 'pure Madonna mother' archetype to the Lady Gaga archetype so-to-speak.

The sexualisation of girls and women is a psyche-op that has been going on now for so long and runs so deep, being targeted toward the collective consciousness of men and women as well as girls..... that I don't think it will be overturned. The Jew run porn/soft porn industries/corporations have done a MASSIVE amount of damage in this regard as well. Many men have their responsibility in the massive success of this deeply sinister agenda as well, since they buy into it, love it and fap off to it to a disturbing degree.

There is also a de-sexualisation agenda happening parallel to it. The de-sexualisation of women who are deemed over the age of sexual attractiveness anymore and the de-sexualisation of women or girls not deemed to be attractive enough to be sexualized. The denigration of females who are being de-sexualized is also a very damaging agenda being put forth into the collective unconscious and so many are consciously willing to go along with it no matter how cruel.

Needless to say, women looking out for women, at the grass roots level particularly, making sure that there are options in desperate circumstances, that there is shelter, food, counselling for those who have been abused, a safe haven for those who are being stalked/threatened/beaten, an environment created so that people who have been raped (be it girls, boys, men or women) can at least speak about it without being put on the defensive..... lots of this kind of work is still very much a necessity.

On a world scale the things being done to many women and girls today is still horrific as it always has been.... honour killings, sex slavery. forced marriages, beatings, rapes and murders of women and much of it to the background sound or silence.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: PFIZIPFEI, Return of Zorro, GMP

AGGRESSIVE FEMINISM = ANARCHISM 20 Mar 2016 10:06 #51

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7961
Summary of the previous page:




PFIZIPFEI wrote:
Timesarrow wrote:
There were a lot of threads with this sort of title started on the Unmentionable Place, and they often used to get closed or descend into ranting, as they were either started or soon taken over by angry MRA misogynist types who were very embittered about women. So before we go any further, let's make it abundantly clear that I'm not an MRA or a misogynist or even a man.

However, I do have some issues with feminism that I would like to throw out to the forum as worthy of discussion.

I don't think feminism has ever been about liberating women, because it has never been about celebrating or encouraging what is specific to women or what comes more naturally to them, but rather about turning them into men.

Note it hinges around concentrating on education so women can get a good career, make a lot of money and be independent, as well as go out drinking and sleep around with no consequences. These have always been the preserves of men. Feminism seems to consider women in their natural state to be weak and worthy of contempt, and only has respect for them the more they ape (some of the worst aspects of) male behaviour.

I'm not sure how it has "empowered" women to spend decades in useless education focusing on a having a "fulfilling career" when only a tiny minority of people in the world, male or female, find fulfilment in their paid work and most people find work stressful and draining.

Also encouraging women to sleep around, "experiment with sex", to see no problem in casual sexual relationships or one-night stands, when this goes completely against hard-wired female biology and has left many millions of women with deep psychological and emotional scars (not to mention STDs and unwanted pregnancies).

I know people say "oh, but feminism gave women the vote!!!" - but really, does this matter an iota? So women now have the right to vote for one meaningless puppet over another, great. And it also suggests that all men were always able to vote while women weren't, which wasn't the case at all.

So, feminism - friend or foe, liberator or oppressor?

This short video is a bit tongue-in-cheek, but highlights many important truths about feminism I think:



PFIZIPFEI wrote:



Speech given by Bowden on the topic of the more radical tendencies of the feminist movement at the London Forum
on September 24, 2011.
Transcript www.counter-currents.com/2015/01/lilith-before-eve-transcript/





PFIZIPFEI wrote:
Family


Raising Little Jewish Feminists

How do we teach kids that gender equality is fabulous?


By Marjorie Ingall | April 23, 2015 12:00 AM






Read by yourself if you want to know how it's done exactly
tabletmag.com/jewish-life-and-religion/189974/raising-jewish-feminists


Zorro wrote:
FEMINISM: A JEWISH PSYOP TO DEMONIZE WHITE WOMEN




Just when we were really making some progress in exposing the jewish orchestrated genocide against Whites, a toxic narrative was injected. Instead of blaming jews for their obvious role in flooding all White countries with hordes of non-White invaders, while also condemning all the White traitors who let it happen, some of the biggest figures in our “movement” started pointing the finger at White women. Women are too horny and want to be ravaged by the savages, they are all feminists, they opened the borders because they are pathologically altruistic, and so on.

After our women started getting raped and assault en masse, some men started saying these women were asking for it, that they deserved it, and that they actually liked it, since “scientific” studies show many women fantasize about rape and even orgasm while they are being brutally defiled. Many of our kinsmen, acting as “good goyim”, lapped up this poisonous narrative that has been spreading like the plague.

Recently a video was released titled Why Women Destroy Civilization, which has been shared by many within our ranks and gone viral. It puts almost all of the blame for our current situation on the unrestrained sexual desires of White women. The video says that women have no loyalty to their in-group, which is why they are always out chasing after foreigners. It never mentions the conquering armies of men (both White and brown) who have created many of the mixed people of this world through rape, the fact that women actually have more loyalty to their men than vice-versa, and the jewish culprits behind race-mixing propaganda. Even still, most women stay loyal to their men, despite all of this programming.

Although there are some White women out fornicating with non-White men, it is still not a large percentage of our population, and not a reason to throw all of our loyal women under the bus. Also, why is it that White men having sex with Asian women is never seen as a problem by many people in our “movement”? In fact, many promote it, since Asian women make the perfect “waifu”.

Apparently no one saw the hypocrisy of The Daily Stormer posting this video about how women lack in-group loyalty, as Andrew Anglin did a video a few years ago with his “jail-bait” Asian girlfriend and was on radio program in 2012 saying that he does not date White girls and that Whites should be bred out of existence.

There have even been discussions on that site about how it’s perfectly righteous for White armies to rape the non-Whites they conquer.

Real Aryan!

The video mentioned above also blames “feminism” and basically states that all White women are feminists, without ever going into any details about some of the merits to first-wave feminist arguments, and who was behind the plague of second-wave feminism.

Lasha Darkmoon comments:

Kyle Hunt is making four important points here that need to be clarified:

(1) It is a mistake to assume that all women are feminists. (2) It is therefore wrong to blame all women for the excesses of feminism, given that many women are anti-feminists; such as myself, for example, who reject modern feminism completely. (3) The early feminists however, known as the “first wave feminists”, starting with Mary Wollstonecraft (1759-1797), are not to be included in the sweeping condemnation of feminism. This is because the reforms the early feminists suggested were valid ones: basically, that women should be treated fairly and not like chattels, nor should they be subjected to exploitation and brutal ill-treatment. No reasonable person, man or woman, would object to that basic principle. (4) The rot set in with second wave feminism, which was deeply influenced by Jewish sources such as Marx and Freud, and these evils were to be taken to a new level of toxicity by third wave feminism.

By this time, the entire movement had been coopted by Jews, with Jewish feminists — e.g., Betty Friedan, Gloria Steinem, Andrea Dworkin — playing a disproportionate role in the promotion of a multitude of poisonous doctrines that have served to drive a wedge between men and women. The end result we see now: an enormous increase in misogyny and misandry. Never before in history has the hatred between the sexes been so virulent, thanks to the machinations of the cultural Marxists who tend to be disproportionately Jewish and serve a Jewish agenda. [LD]

The video [linked by Kaminski in his article] shows images of absurd feminist stereotypes, a photoshopped image of a woman holding a sign saying that she will trade racists for rapists, and Femen protesters, implying that this is the way all White women think and act. Of course the video does not make any mention of how Femen is funded by Jewish billionaire George Soros.



FEMEN : FUNDED BY JEWISH BILLIONAIRE GEORGE SOROS

The solution given by the video is for men to severely control the sexuality and thinking of their women. It is a little vague as to how this exactly should be done, but I imagine when they speak of a return of “patriarchy”, they mean a return to the traditional Christian mindset, where women are basically confined to household chores and bearing children, covered head to toe in clothing. This is just swinging from one extreme to another, without ever realizing there is a happy medium between slutwalks and the nunnery.

In National Socialist Germany, women were not feminist whores, and although they were encouraged to be mothers with large families, women were not simply powerless possessions. Some women, such as Leni Riefenstahl and Hanna Reitsch, even surpassed male counterparts in their fields. National Socialists, who had been mired in a jewish pornographic culture for decades, did not seek to cover up all nudity and sexuality, but instead elevated the human form to new heights of beauty and spirituality, as is evidenced by their high art. This was also the way of many of our pre-Christian ancestors.

This desire to control women and view them as essentially worthless comes directly from jewish brains, going all the way back to blaming evil Eve for taking the apple in the garden of Eden. Observant jews thank YHVH every morning “that He didn’t make me a gentile, that He didn’t make me a woman, that He didn’t make me an ignoramus.” The Tractate Shabbat, sums up the attitude of jewish religious law toward women: they are “a sack full of excrement” with a bleeding hole. Jewish men essentially enslave their women and treat them worse than dogs. Haaretz even admits:

If a man and a woman are drowning in a river, first they’ll save the man, ‘who is obligated to perform more commandments,’ whereas a woman’s ‘wisdom is only in the spindle.’ In fact, ‘words of Torah should be burned rather than being given to women.’

This poison was passed onto the other two Abrahamic religions, Christianity and Islam. They all treat their women in a similar fashion, which is clearly demonstrated by their Orthodox dress (pictured). There’s no difference with a nun in her habit and a Muslim in her burka, but if you were to listen to the advice given by the video in question, this is the only solution to save civilization. I don’t know about you, but I don’t think that beautiful women in sundresses is really at the root of our problem.

Even though the video does not make ONE mention of Jews, many otherwise jew-wise people apparently could not see the jew rubbing his hands behind the scenes, and instead bought this psychological operation hook, line and sinker. John Kaminski, a former writer for this site, submitted a piece that I refused to post. In it, he says that blaming women is the ultimate third rail topic, which is even more dangerous than blaming jews:

More dangerous than talking about 9/11, Jews or exposing the government as a robotic phantom by the UN and the IMF, might well be this topic which is sure to set off at least half the world in an eruption of outrage and denial. Yes, this just might be the ultimate third rail topic, leading you to be torn apart, like the legendary Orpheus, by a rabid mob of outraged women.

‘Why women destroy nations’ (he links to the video)

Women don’t care about the welfare of their country or their civilization. They seek to maximize their chances of bearing viable offspring. The feminization of the West has been a disaster.

The damage done to the West might be irreparably damaged. It might not be able to be repaired.

So watch the video and know without doubt that when you do, you will have your hands tightly wrapped around the third rail. How you deal with the realization that women like the idea of their country being destroyed by a rampage of virile men might just determine the viability of our future and the fate of the world.

So he really thinks women like the idea of having their countries destroyed by these virile invaders?

I understand that generalizations can be useful sometimes, but this is poison being pushed here! Many, many women are vehemently opposed to what is going on, while many men are all for letting these invaders overrun their countries.

Also, the implication is that White women are in such a position of power that they can orchestrate the mass movements of millions of people and use government positions to provide the incentives and protections to the invaders. The people who espouse this line of thinking will use Angela Merkel as an example to prove how women are behind this, neglecting to mention that she is a Communist jew-lover (if not a Jewess herself), who is the puppet head of a still-occupied country.

No, let’s just blame White women for everything.

I bet those little girls in Rotherham (and all over the White world) actually invited the Pakistani rapists into their country and then begged to be sex slaves for them. They deserve what they get! It’s the same with all of those German women who were raped to death by Soviets in WW2, since “women like the idea of their country being destroyed by a rampage of virile men.” I’m sure they were orgasming all night before having their brains bashed in. They deserved it!



German women and children destroyed by Stalin’s Red Army rapists
“Women like the idea of their country being destroyed by a rampage of virile men.” — John Kaminski

LD comments: It is the above extremely toxic comment by Kaminski that has made the author of this article, Kyle Hunt, white-hot with rage — as he admits below. No matter how you look at it, it is an inexcusable comment to make. Did the two million German women who were mass raped by the Russian army after WWII welcome the attentions of the “virile men” who decided to go on a rape “rampage”? Did the German women in Cologne on Christmas Eve “like the idea” of being sexually assaulted by those “virile men” from Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, and North Africa?

Kaminski has argued that his comments have been misunderstood, misinterpreted, and taken out of context. It is not for me to pass judgement on Kaminski here except to say that he could have chosen his words more wisely. For example, how could he possibly say: “Women don’t care about the welfare of their country or their civilization.” Such a comment is not only grossly unfair, it is offensive in the extreme to the vast number of women who DO care about the welfare of their country and civilization.

I care about the welfare of my country. I certainly don’t wish to see my civilization go down the drain. I’m sure Kyle Hunt’s wife feels the same way about her country and civilization. I’m sure there are millions of good women everywhere who feel outraged to be told: “You don’t care about the welfare of your country! You don’t give a damn about our great Western civilization! All you want to do is open your legs to ‘virile men’ and be impregnated by their seed because all you’re after is ‘to maximize your chances of bearing viable offspring.’ “

Let Kyle continue. You can see he is really angry with Kaminski and would like to tear him apart apart, limb from limb, for uttering such abominations against the entire female sex. The crime Kaminski is being accused of is this: undiluted and indiscriminate misogyny. [LD]

KYLE HUNT: If I was on the air right now, instead of writing, I would be yelling!

I cannot express the rage I feel when White men allow their women to be blamed, instead of seeing how they are being victimized by Jews, non-White savages, and pathetic White men.

According to Kaminski, I am a male feminist for standing up for White women as they are being relentlessly assaulted from all angles. Others out there will say that I am “white knighting” for not going along with the toxic narrative of “Women Destroy Civilizations” and blaming our beloved mothers, sisters, wives, and daughters for everything that went wrong in our world.

Good, we need more White knights!!

Does this woman deserve to be spat upon by Muslims, jews, AND White men?



WHITE WOMAN BEING SPAT UPON

White women hold the key to our future – through their words, willpower, and wombs. Do not be fooled by the multi-faceted psychological operations being run to divide us from each other. White men and women need to stop fighting against each other, realize the existential threat facing us and our offspring, and come together to battle those who seek our destruction.

White women do not destroy civilization, Jews do!

And real White men do not condemn their women, they defend them! www.darkmoon.me/2016/feminism-a-jewish-psyop-to-demonize-white-women/



Zorro wrote:
GMP wrote:
There are lots of different feminisms.
You neo dudes have invented your own, defined it on here and you obviously don't like it.
Fair play, possibly that's why you invented it, in order to attack it
Maybe you should look at some of the other feminisms.
You might find one that you enjoy.
Post-feminism is a good place to begin.

What about you just shut up and admit/realise the fact that nobody here bar an idiot or one of your fellow partners in crime is interested in your transparent lies, or indeed listens any more to a single fucking word any of you say. Or haven't you noticed yet? I think you must have noticed, but you'll carry on regardless, just like the good little zio-bot and cultural Marxist shill and broken record that you quite clearly are. Your repetition techniques no longer work, and as a result you will start becoming more marginalised and shunned by the masses.

"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Return of Zorro

Feminism - Empowerment or Oppression? 22 Mar 2016 16:31 #52

  • GMP
  • GMP's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 3506
  • Likes received: 856
You're a 'visual learner' aren't you Pfiz?
Someone more at home with images than text.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Feminism - Empowerment or Oppression? - Dragged from the street into the subway to be gangraped 24 Mar 2016 18:06 #53

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7961
^
In fact this is a natural competence in women ... didn't you know that?




Then: When in Rome, do as the Romans do!
Now: When in Stockholm, Munich, Salzburg, Zürich ... also do as the Romans do!




Dragged from the street into the subway to be gangraped






On one hand men complaining about feminism,
on the other men who mass rape women ...
we are at war.

.
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: annabelle

Feminism - Empowerment or Oppression? 26 Mar 2016 13:42 #54

The Realist Report with John Friend 15/3/2016


John was joined by F. Roger Devlin, author of Sexual Utopia in Power: The Feminist Revolt Against Civilization, who he met at the recent NPI conference in Washington, D.C. They discussed the basic concepts and arguments in Delvin's book, which revolve largely around the decline of virtue in women in the modern Western world. They also discussed the ideological origins and tenets of feminism, the traditional family unit and monogamous marriage, cultural Marxism, and a number of related topics. whoolisblog.blogspot.co.uk/2016/03/the-realist-report-with-john-friend_18.html
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. – Marcus Aurelius
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Feminism - Empowerment or Oppression? 26 Mar 2016 14:35 #55

  • GMP
  • GMP's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 3506
  • Likes received: 856
They discussed womens "decline of virtue".
FFS who are those dudes?
Eminent Victorians?
LOL
:)
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Feminism - Empowerment or Oppression? 26 Mar 2016 17:53 #56

  • bd
  • bd's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • bikerdruid
  • Posts: 3658
  • Likes received: 471
who gets to define "decline in virtue."
(or, "virtue," for that matter)
"From each according to his ability, to each according to his need."
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Feminism - Empowerment or Oppression? 29 Mar 2016 20:46 #57



The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. – Marcus Aurelius
Last Edit: 29 Mar 2016 20:49 by Return of Zorro.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Feminism - Empowerment or Oppression? 05 Apr 2016 14:00 #58

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7961
Mario wrote:
Honestly does this so called woman has not a truly male face figure?
Maybe a male convert of the past posing as woman? ..........
nothing would surprise me in there agenda game!
Who would possibly noticed??
Maybe one more of there created rotten lies??
Maybe a nude image would resolve this question & fits the topic title.
Also just a slight name change from Ernest to Ernestine.

And naturally so flat breasted ..... No silicon jobs in that time line yet.



I only got rid of the hair & tried to add a sort of ear :D ....... not to good in this.......
Original on the left


Ernestine Rose - "America's First Jewish Feminist" ........... or ▼▼maybe a good boy?
May 16, 2015



@
oiram @
Full comment: TOPIC: Do Feminists Have "Penis" Envy?






:right: Ernestine Rose, the First Jewish Feminist

.
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Feminism - Empowerment or Oppression? 05 Apr 2016 15:33 #59

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20433
  • Likes received: 7961


How I Overcame Feminism






Video description:

A video detailing my past, how I changed my liberal, feminist beliefs and values and ended up as a conservative and Hungarian nationalist.

.
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Feminism - Empowerment or Oppression? 05 Apr 2016 17:14 #60

On Friday March 4th 2016 a group of SJW's and feminist gathered outside the Railway Club in Vancouver where a man named Augustus Invictus was scheduled to give a talk. He was stopped at the Canadian border and refused entry on the grounds that he "has no legitimate reason to enter the country and will just cause trouble." This didn't stop the social justice warriors from bringing the trouble anyways as rebel media reporter Lauren Southern was assaulted when a girl decided to dump a bottle of piss water all over her.

The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. – Marcus Aurelius
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Related topics

Topic subjectRelevanceDate of latest post
Insanity Of Modern Feminism.7.05Sunday, 23 September 2018
My Solution To The Demographic And Feminism Problem.6.97Tuesday, 28 August 2018
Biological Mating as opposed to (((MGTOW))) and (((feminism)))6.89Sunday, 09 June 2019
[excerpt of] MGTOW and Feminism versus Biological Mating6.82Thursday, 26 October 2017
Feminism, American Bundism, The Jewish Labor Bund and Judaism6.75Sunday, 15 October 2017
Moderators: novum, rodin, Flare
Powered by Kunena Forum

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it. Secure transactions via paypal.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2019 - May 2020, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 260 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 210 - Raised
( £ 160 GBP )
donation thermometer
62%
Updated
6th January 2020

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.