Your donations are appreciated and help keep this site running. Even the smallest amount helps.
Thankyou

 
PROMOTE YOUR SITE
HERE
Only $3 USD/month
TRUTHSPOON.COM
The man they can't recruit!
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2

TOPIC: ''Against Good Breeding: Understanding Jewish Opposition to Eugenics ''

''Against Good Breeding: Understanding Jewish Opposition to Eugenics '' 20 Oct 2014 13:28 #1

  • Cinta
  • Cinta's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Never Again
  • ''None are more hopelessly enslaved,than those who falsely believe they are free
  • Posts: 5333
  • Likes received: 1066
Marian van Court is a scholar on human intelligence.
She runs a eugenics website on which the works of Charles Murray are
published. She has written for Mankind Quarterly and Occidental Quarterly.
She coauthored with Richard Lynn a book on dysgenics.

''Against Good Breeding: Understanding Jewish Opposition to Eugenics ''
by Marian Van Court on July 11, 2014
(Long article; I haven't quoted everything)

''The story of eugenics has been a tragedy. The basic idea goes back to antiquity
–the belief that the world would become a much better place if healthy and
intelligent people had the most children.
But in the 20th century, in a bizarre and mysterious twist of fate, something went
terribly wrong, and what began as an altruistic movement to help future generations
ended in the barbaric murder of millions. This fantastical tale has long been the
accepted history of eugenics but is that really what happened?''

''Recently, John Glad published Jewish Eugenics,[1] which adds important new
pieces to this puzzle, and when combined with already-established facts, a
radically different picture of the history of eugenics emerges. JE gives an overview
of Jewish participation in eugenics which shows consistent support in Israel from
its birth in 1948 to the present, and among the majority of Jews in the West until
the late 1960s, at which time most Jewish social scientists and journalists
reversed themselves to vehement denunciation, which remains their position
today. The question immediately arises: “Why the mass reversal?”
Glad states matter-of-factly that most Jews in the West altered their position 180°,
and then he moves on, offering no explanation for this extraordinary event, but that
will be the central focus of this paper.''

''Eugenics is widely reviled as “the ideology of the holocaust,” the most diabolical
scheme in all of history.Furthermore, the very idea of Jewish eugenics may seem
strange, since eugenics is associated in the minds of most people with the Nazis.
Nevertheless, eugenics is now, and has always been, practiced in Israel:

''Unlike the U.S. situation, this anti-eugenics view never even got off the ground in
Israel. Behavioral scientist Aviad Raz (b. 1968) of Ben Gurion University is quite
open in pointing out that both the word ‘eugenics’ and the actual practice of
eugenics enjoy broad approval in that country, and objections to eugenics at least
as far as genetic screening combined with eugenic abortions – are a ‘non-issue’ in
Israel: Eugenic ideologies and practices have persisted in Israel, in a thinly
disguised mode, even after the holocaust, because they were an inherent and
formative part of Zionism . . .

Ancient Jewish Eugenics

''Jews have practiced eugenics since ancient times. Moreover, eugenics is an
integral part of Judaism, and of the evolution of the Jewish people themselves.
Eugenics is thought to be responsible for their higher average IQ, and consequently,
for their higher incomes and disproportionate success in virtually all fields of
endeavor. Richard Lynn has written extensively on this subject, and has estimated
the average IQ of Jews worldwide to be 110.[3] Nathaniel Weyl proposed an interesting
theory to explain how this IQ advantage came about:

''The selective character of the Captivity and the Return was perpetuated by eugenic
practices, based on learning and scholarship, which would persist for centuries of
Jewish history . . . [which has] sometimes been considered as a vast experiment,
in which status was based on intellect serving religion, in which intellectuals were
commanded not to be chaste, but to be fertile, in which the rich and successful
sought brilliant rabbinical scholars as husbands for their daughters . . . [4]''

''In addition, in a society that places an enormous premium on learning, it might be
expected that those of lower intelligence would be accorded little respect, and little
of everything else, so they would have the most to gain by defecting.
Also, it might be asked, why did Jews value intelligence so much in the first place?
Perhaps they were smarter than the other people around them from ancient times,
and they wanted to keep it that way – in other words, a sort of “founder effect.
” Finally, the “Shadchan,” or marriage broker, may also have played a significant role
in Jewish eugenics:

'T'he Pentateuch raised Eugenics into a matter of religion . . . The much-despised
Shadchan or marriage broker as an institution had many obvious faults. Yet, in a
quiet, unscientific manner he has been the means of curing mere sentiment and
passion in the matter of mating of sons and daughters of Israel . . .
The Shadchan is distinctively on the side of Eugenics in ‘regulating’ the union of
men and women . . . [5]''

Jewish Attitudes towards Eugenics do an About-Face in the West

''Glad quotes a Jewish eugenicist in a 1930s journal:
“The eugenicist . . . does not aim to establish a race of supermen, but rather, a
race of sturdy, intelligent and healthy individuals similar to the large proportion of
the human family now in existence.”[6]
Later, he cites another Jewish eugenicist’s 3-point plan:
Social Eugenics will accomplish the following: It will reduce future welfare rolls.
It will reduce our prison population. It will reduce future crimes. It will consist of a
simple three-point plan: First, the Aid to Dependent Children will be phased out. . . .
Second . . . Persons on Welfare who consent to sterilization will receive a one
thousand dollar cash bonus. . . Third, all prison inmates will be [given] a three-year
reduction in their prison sentences if they consent to sterilization.[7]''

''In much of the Western world during the 1920s and 1930s, eugenics was a
popular cause. Some of its more notable proponents include H. G. Wells,
Charles Darwin, Margaret Sanger, Winston Churchill, Francis Galton, George Bernard Shaw,
Charles Lindbergh, Alexander Graham Bell, Theodore Roosevelt, Oliver Wendell Holmes,
and Julian Huxley. Huxley described eugenics as “of all outlets for altruism, that
which is most comprehensive and of longest range.” Wells said, “It seemed to me
that to discourage the multiplication of people below a certain standard, and to
encourage the multiplication of exceptionally superior people, was the only real
and permanent way of mending the ills of the world.”

''Then in the late 1960s, the majority of Jewish social scientists and journalists in
Europe and North America did an about-face, reversing their position to one of
harsh denunciation of eugenics, and since there was no organized opposition,
their beliefs became both the academic orthodoxy and the “conventional wisdom.
” This has lasted about 50 years to the present day. Although Glad never even
speculates about why this remarkable event occurred, he provides the first clue
that it coincided with the birth of the Holocaust Memorial Movement, which can
hardly be an insignificant coincidence.''

''In 1971, Stephen Jay Gould published The Mismeasure of Man.[9] It received
lavish praise all ’round, and won numerous awards. It was translated into
10 languages, and it became required reading for undergraduate and graduate
courses in psychology, anthropology, and sociology. ''

''The environmentalists had no remotely compelling evidence that heredity is
unimportant in human behavior for the pure and simple reason that this is
nonsense. There’s a mountain of scientific evidence on twins and adopted children
which proves the importance of heredity. So they merely sniped at the research of
their opponents, especially their older, outdated research, while generating none of
their own – and herein lies the third clue about the Jews’ about-face on eugenics:
most of them have produced precious little (if anything at all) in the way of original
research. If they had truth on their side, they should be able to prove their assertions
with research, but they didn’t even try, suggesting that they knew all along it would
be futile. Their new secular religion was made up of “politically correct” tenets that
have become articles of faith. Not only is their set of beliefs true, they insist, it is
the only moral stance. Doesn’t this sound suspicious? How can a question of fact
become a moral duty to believe?

''In 1985, Daniel Kevles published a book entitled In the Name of Eugenics:
Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity.[13] It first appeared in serial form in
The New Yorker, and it was also extremely well-received, very influential, and
widely cited. In the first chapter, Kevles states that Francis Galton, Charles Darwin’s
cousin and the “father of eugenics,” believed in eugenics because (1) he was born
into the aristocracy, and (as Marx would claim) he was an elitist participant in the
“class struggle” of capitalism, and because (2) he and his wife were childless, a
psychological need arose which led him to promote eugenics. ''

''The following quote by Lucy Davidowicz provides another example of the uncritical
thinking so typical of the anti-eugenics literature: “Negative eugenics was
[the Nazis’] program designed first to halt the procreation of persons . . . through
sterilization, and then eventually to kill them [sic].”[15] Aside from being untrue,
if the goal of the Nazis had been to prevent procreation, it would be absurd to first
sterilize people, and then to kill them!

''This quote also brings up the important subject of euthanasia. In the years before
World War II, Germany had an unusually large institutionalized population, mostly
psychotic or severely debilitated by illness. Hitler instituted a program of euthanasia
to give them a “merciful death.” The historical record shows that he did this in order
to free up medical supplies and personnel which he knew he would need for future
military campaigns. Whether this program was wise or unwise is irrelevant to the
issue at hand, because euthanasia has nothing whatsoever to do with eugenics.
People who are institutionalized do not procreate, so euthanasia would serve no
eugenic purpose. Yet somehow, euthanasia has become entangled conceptually
with eugenics. It’s difficult to know to what extent this was an accident, and to
what extent eugenics may have been deliberately confounded with euthanasia, as
the Davidowicz quote might suggest. The unfortunate result of this confusion is
that many educated people today still believe eugenics is a program of forcible
mass murder of the weak and infirm.''

The Anti-Eugenics Movement is a Hoax.

''The big gun in the arsenal of the anti-eugenicists is their claim that eugenics caused
the holocaust, and more generally, that eugenics invariably leads to genocide, and
for that reason it’s extremely dangerous and should be banned everywhere.
Unfortunately, this belief is often treated as self-evident, as if it needs no proof, but
it is hardly self-evident!'

''Despite the fact that this is accepted as true in much of the Western world, in reality
it can easily be proven to be false: (1) It’s well-known that in the 1920s and 1930s,
there were numerous eugenics programs in countries around the world, including
America and a number of European nations,[16] and that in one of these countries,
Nazi Germany, genocide was committed. If eugenics causes genocide as its
opponents claim then why was there no genocide in all those other countries?
Why were there literally dozens of exceptions to this rule? (2) Both before and
after the Nazis, mass murder and genocide have been committed many times
throughout history. The Communists murdered far more people that the Nazis did,
and they vehemently opposed eugenics. History records numerous instances of
genocide in the absence of eugenics, and numerous instances of eugenics in the
absence of genocide, andonly one instance in which they even existed in the
same time and place.[17] These are hardly obscure facts of history, nor are they
in dispute. The plain fact is that eugenics has nothing whatsoever to do with genocide.''


''On the face of it, the very notion that a program designed to help future generations
is directly responsible for mass murder is preposterous. Assertions of causality
for example, “The influenza virus causes the flu” – need to be backed up with facts
if they are to be taken seriously. But in this case, where are the facts? To assert
that “Germany had a eugenics program and the holocaust took place there” is
wholly inadequate. Furthermore, even a cursory examination of the historical
record is sufficient to rule out a causal link. What’s remarkable is that this blatant
falsehood has been vigorously promoted to the public for decades to the point
where most people actually believe it – which elevates it from a mere falsehood to
the status of a “hoax.” This raises the intriguing question of who is behind this hoax,
and what exactly have they been trying to accomplish by it? ''

''The vast majority of Western anti-eugenicists have been Jews. (Of course, only a '
small minority of Jews were anti-eugenicists.) They denounced eugenics with such
remarkable and relentless ferocity that it has become profoundly stigmatized.
As a result of their tidal wave of distortions, the image of eugenics was completely
transformed in the mind of the public. It seems almost miraculous how they managed
to replace the normal, honest, correct, sane image the public has held of eugenics
since its inception – that of a transparently altruistic effort to help future generations
into the most vicious form of pure evil ever to scourge our planet.''

''By the late 20th century, the few beleaguered eugenicists still left, mostly academics
with tenure, struggled to carry on their work:
Dissidents are subjected to academic shunning. Their books and articles are not
recommended for publication or are ignored if published, and are certainly not
assigned to students. Many librarians not only will not order them, but will refuse
to accept them as gifts. Such authors are not invited to participate in conferences
or deliver guest lectures, are not awarded grants or academic appointments, and
even their correspondence goes unanswered. . .

''Furthermore, it was hard to fathom how the public could be so easily brainwashed
about eugenics when science, logic, and morality were all firmly on its side.
We wondered: Have they considered even once the alternative to eugenics, which
is dysgenics (genetic deterioration)? Do they really want to see each generation
become more sickly, more stupid, poorer, and more criminal than the last one?''

''Among the handful of eugenicists remaining, opinion was divided on the subject of
why eugenics was in a shambles. Everyone agreed that it had been unfairly tarnished
because of guilt-by-association with Hitler – an extremely unfortunate but nevertheless
“natural” result of a confluence of world events – whereas a few suspected more
was involved. The anti-eugenicists were not merely mistaken or misguided by this
time, we knew that they knew they were lying. Bear in mind that during the 1970s
and 1980s, hardly anyone had even heard about the thriving eugenics program in Israel.''

''A number of modern Jewish intellectual movements have used wholesale deception to
mold public opinion to create a climate favorable to their own interests to the
detriment of society at large (see MacDonald, 1998b). A broader perspectivecan be
achieved with regard to the anti-eugenics hoax after stepping back and viewing it in
this context.When it is seen alongside these other movements, the anti-eugenics
hoax begins to make more sense. Examples: Marxism, Freudian psychoanalysis,
“open immigration,” and most recently, neo-conservatism.
The neoconservatives lied America into war with Iraq (Israel’s enemy), and their
campaign for war, significantly, has also been characterized as a “hoax.”[20]''

''Not just “many” or “most” anti-eugenicists have been Jews, but the “overwhelming
majority,” and this distinction is crucial because it defines anti-eugenics as a Jewish
movement, and makes it reasonable to assume that it was intended to benefit Jews
in some way. Also, they engaged in massive fraud for a period of 50 years to accomplish
their goal, so the anti-eugenics hoax clearly “fits” alongside the other Jewish intellectual
movements which MacDonald has written about.
Now at least we have the beginnings of an answer starting to take shape, a preliminary
step closer to solving the puzzle. We’re still left with the question of how destroying
eugenics could possibly help Jews, but this will be answered below.

As touched on earlier, eugenics is part of a cluster of issues along with IQ, race,
and the Nature-Nurture question. These, in turn, are part of a larger matrix known
as “political correctness,” or “leftist fascism,” and this includes immigration,
intermarriage, diversity, and multi-culturalism.
Much has been written about political correctness – nobody knows quite where it
came from, and why it has taken over the Western world with a vengeance.
Political correctness didn’t just occur arbitrarily like a change in the weather, it
happened because people made it happen, people who derived (and continue to
derive) benefit from it. MacDonald believes that the current Zeitgeist, with its various
manifestations, is the product of Jews and Jewish organizations working for
decades to re-create the social and political landscape, bit by bit, into one which
benefits their own narrow ethnic interests.''

''Case in point: Immigration. Jews have been persecuted throughout their long history,
and quite understandably, their paramount concern is making sure that it doesn’t
happen again. In a confident, united, ethnically homogeneous society like Nazi
Germany Jews are much more vulnerable as conspicuous outsiders, and they
know this both consciously and unconsciously.
They are safer and more powerful in a society which is divided and disorganized,
where they are more free to advance their own agenda, unnoticed and without
interference. In Israel, immigration is closed to everyone except Jews, regardless
of their need for refuge. ''

Decline in Our Intelligence: Dysgenic Fertility for IQ

''Historically, eugenicists have been concerned with promoting good health and
increasing intelligence, or at least preventing its decline, because of its profound
importance to a strong economy, a low level of crime, progress in every field, and
the overall quality of life. Scientific research on fertility and IQ gives us a clearer
picture of the importance of eugenics, and the consequences of dysgenics.''

''Richard Lynn is the world’s foremost authority on eugenics and dysgenics.
In his book, Dysgenics: Genetic Deterioration in Modern Societies,[20] he
explains that before 1800 in America and Europe, there was “natural fertility,” i.e.,
no effort was made to prevent conception. Married couples often had large families,
but men with little income couldn’t marry so they remained childless, and the net
result was a slight positive correlation between number of children and intelligence.''

''The problem of dysgenic fertility arose with the advent of contraception.
Several books were published in the mid-1800s which gave advice on how to prevent
pregnancy, and of course they influenced those who could read disproportionately.
Goodyear perfected the vulcanization of rubber in 1839, condoms and diaphragms
became available, and the middle and upper classes began having fewer children.
This caused widespread alarm that intelligence might be declining, and in the late
1800s and early 1900s, various studies were conducted to test this hypothesis.
For example, in England a negative correlation was reported between the IQs of
school children and the number of their siblings, which seemed to confirm worries
about dysgenics. ''

''Finally in 1985, Van Court and Bean published the results of their study of fertility
and IQ which used a large representative sample of the U.S. population that provided
an overview of this relationship for most of the 20th century.
In all 15 of the 5-year cohorts, correlations between IQ and number of children
were negative, and 12 of 15 were statistically significant.[21]
More recently, Lynn and Van Court did a follow-up study using the same data set
which included new data collected in the 1990s, and the results were very similar.
[22] Paradoxically, James Flynn, a New Zealand political scientist, has provided
evidence that phenotypic IQ has actually increased over part of this period,[23]
but his findings were challenged by Rushton and Jensen who reported that the IQ
sub-tests which improved most over time were the least highly g loaded,[24] which
means they measure mental processes that are not highly correlated with general
intelligence. At any rate, from 1880 to 1979, dysgenic fertility for IQ in America has
resulted in a loss of .9 points per generation (= 25 years). Multiplying .9 IQ points
x 4 generations = 3.6 points, thus we find that genotypic intelligence declined in
America during this period by 3.6 points. A loss of this magnitude approximately
doubles the number of retardates (IQ < 70), and halves the number of gifted
(IQ > 130).[25]''

The Eugenics Boogie Man

''A compelling case can be made that many of our most serious social problems
would have been alleviated – not eliminated entirely, but significantly alleviated if
eugenicists had been able to carry on their work into the 21st century.
Early eugenics programs have been sharply criticized, often with justification, but
a great deal of what existed in the 1920s and 1930s – Model-t Fords, rumble seats,
Prohibition – has changed for the better since then. It would be a mistake to assume
that eugenics-in-its-infancy is eugenics.
Not only has Israel had a long-standing and successful eugenics program, other
countries, such as Sweden, have too, consisting of education, incentives and
disincentives, plus medical advances. There is every reason to expect that the
early eugenics programs in North America and Europe would have matured from
their simple beginnings to become more sophisticated and more effective as various
policies were openly debated and new discoveries in genetics and reproductive
biology were made.''

''Jews used eugenics most recently to virtually eradicate Tay Sachs disease worldwide,
which is a great benefit to them, but it is disheartening to imagine the much larger
populations of non-Jews and all the blessings which eugenics might have bestowed on
them over the past half-century, but couldn’t – the greater prosperity, the violent
crimes prevented, the better health – and for what purpose were these benefits
prevented? From studying MacDonald’s work, we see that the anti-eugenics hoax
fits a well-established pattern of behavior in which Jews use large-scale deception
to advance their own ethnic interests to the detriment of other citizens.
They’ve been warning the Western world for 50 years now about the dreaded
“Eugenics Boogie Man,” ready to devour the world if set free, and they’ve succeeded
the public has been thoroughly brainwashed, and appropriately terrorized.''

''So the final remaining question is: “How was destroying eugenics in the West
supposed to benefit Jews?” Was it merely to add another element of sensationalism
to the holocaust narrative? Or is it possible, God forbid, that by destroying eugenics,
they have been deliberately promoting dysgenics – genetic deterioration – among
gentiles? MacDonald’s research[34] has shown that a cadre of Jewish intellectuals
has been actively working for decades to destroy gentile culture, so is it such a
leap to think they’re trying to destroy the population genetically as well?
As shocking as this sounds, why else would they have spent decades fanatically
attacking eugenics in the West?

''In his review of Glad’s book, MacDonald notes:
The fact that Jewish activists have dominated the anti-eugenics movement in the
West and that they tend to hold hostile views toward the traditional people and
culture of the West suggest that their opposition to eugenics may also have another
motive lurking in the background besides their hatred for anything associated with
National Socialism: facilitating the genetic decline of the West as an outgroup.
Jewish promotion of massive non-White immigration may also be similarly motivated.[35]'

''When eugenics is eliminated, dysgenics automatically takes its place, and this is
totally predictable. By definition, dysgenics is the weakening of a population
genetically. Reason dictates that their intention was to do exactly what they did
they destroyed eugenics and genetically weakened Europe and North America.
There’s no point in searching high and low for a tortured or convoluted alternative
explanation for something that is so simple and so obvious.''

''Worldwide, Jews are much smaller numerically than the populations of the Western
nations, and they are far more homogeneous genetically.
This means that a eugenics program in the West would produce improvements in
health and IQ, plus alleviate all social problems, faster than a comparable eugenics
program in Israel. The reason is that selection on a large, heterogeneous population
(of any organism) operates much more effectively than on a small, homogeneous
one. In addition, Jews have been practicing eugenics for thousands of years, so
they are very probably nearer to their peak in terms of what they can attain in IQ
than gentiles are, and presumably the anti-eugenicists are well aware of this.''

''The fact that Israel is a Jewish state, whereas North America and Europe have
only a tiny percentage of Jews, is a distinction of crucial importance to the
anti-eugenicists, although, almost certainly, they would deny it. In fact, that’s the
reason there’s eugenics in Israel today, and dysgenics in North America and Europe.
If they had no intention to secretly inflict harm on other ethnic groups, and if they
honestly wanted to protect the world from eugenics, then why is it the case that all
this time, the anti-eugenicists never lifted a finger to “save” the poor Israelis?
They are not merely threatened by the Eugenics Boogie Man – the Israelis are
under attack! Perhaps miraculously, after 65 years of eugenics, the Israelis have
managed to stave off genocide all on their own. But the point here is that if the
anti-eugenicists had no ulterior motives, wouldn’t they have tried to dismantle an
actual eugenics program in Israel instead of spending decades warning Western
countries about its potential horrors?'

''People might wonder why some Jews would want to weaken the gene pool of the
West, while simultaneously strengthening the gene pool of Israel. The answer, in a
word, is “power.” Some Jews tend to be quite ethnocentric, with an “us versus them”
mentality, viewing other racial groups as competitors, adversaries, or even enemies,
and presumably the anti-eugenicists wanted their perceived “enemies” (most importantly,
gentiles of European descent) to “breed themselves down” so they will pose less of
a threat, making it easier for Jews to dominate them politically and economically
long into the future.''

''Suddenly, with this new understanding, the anti-eugenics hoax seems extraordinary
in so many ways.
It brings to mind the old adage, “Truth is stranger than fiction,” because this is
genuinely strange! All these years, no one had any inkling that a nefarious plot
was secretly unfolding. The word “conspiracy” hasn’t been used yet, but make no
mistake, a conspiracy it was, and is. It shows how far they will go to create an
advantage for fellow Jews whom they will never even see, and this reveals a degree
of ethnocentrism unheard of in any other group. It shows that some core Jews are
genuinely at war with the rest of the world. It shows their phenomenal talent for
propaganda, and their extraordinary ability to act in concert over large expanses
of space and time.''

''t’s disturbing to realize how well the actions of the anti-eugenicists conform to the
worst anti-Semitic stereotype: that Jews acquire power far in excess of their numbers
which they use to advance their own narrow interests, while producing a harmful
effect throughout the larger society; that they show deep concern for other Jews
but indifference (at best) to the well-being of fellow citizens; and finally, that they
engage in massive dishonest practices and double-dealing. It can’t be denied that
the “anti-eugenics hoax” further strengthens this negative stereotype, demonstrating
along with the disastrous Iraq war – that it may not be an entirely irrational vestige
of a bye-gone era with no relevance to the world today. Americans might seriously
reconsider whether we have a true democracy when so few control so many, and
wonder what other hoaxes and frauds they may be peddling. To this point, Glad
writes that “So obviously and so radically is [the] accepted holocaust narrative out
of whack with reality.”[36]

A Crime against Humanity?

''Recall that before 1960, eugenics still had a fairly good reputation.
After World War II, it was tarnished by the association with Hitler, but there were
still eugenics journals, eugenics conferences, and eugenics programs in a number
of countries. The public knew the purpose of eugenics is to make future generations
healthier, smarter, richer, and less violent – so how could the anti-eugenicists argue
against that? Since eugenics is an altruistic endeavor, the anti-eugenicists would
have to convince the public that it causes something downright catastrophic in
order to turn everyone against it. What’s the worst thing in the whole wide world?
Genocide! Eugenics causes genocide! This ruse was convenient because Hitler
had been a particularly ardent proponent of eugenics. Of course, the assertion
that “eugenics causes genocide” doesn’t even make sense – it’s kind of like saying
“Accounting causes mass murder,” or “Gardening is responsible for train wrecks.
” Moreover, those making this nonsensical assertion never seem to feel the slightest
obligation to explain how eugenics causes genocide.
The road from eugenics to genocide is filled with emotion-laden narratives, but a
specific, concrete causal link is conspicuously missing. Yet the anti-eugenicists
succeeded in convincing the public in spite of it because they repeated their message
hundreds of thousands of times, along with their extensive network of “fellow travelers”
among academics and journalists – on TV, in the universities, movies, magazines,
books, journals, and newspapers – so how could it be wrong?''

''The bottom line is that the 50-year-long “Jewish assault on eugenics” is an assault
on the health and well-being of literally millions of people.
It’s difficult even to grasp something so vicious as secretly degrading entire populations
genetically because it should be obvious to any normal person that this produces
a vast amount of suffering. Readers can decide for themselves whether the anti-eugenics
hoax constitutes a crime against humanity:

''Crimes against humanity as defined by the Rome Statute of the International Criminal
Court Explanatory Memorandum, ‘are particularly odious offenses in that they
constitute a serious attack on human dignity or grave humiliation or a degradation
of one or more human beings . . . Murder; extermination; torture; rape; political,
racial, or religious persecution and other inhumane acts reach the threshold of
crimes against humanity only if they are part of a widespread or systematic
practice.’ [my emphases][37]''

Conclusion

''The old history of eugenics as “altruistic endeavor which mysteriously led to mass
murder” was based on an unstable foundation. Inherently, it was highly implausible,
and more importantly, it was demonstrably false. The new interpretation offered
here tells a startling new story, one which is a radical departure from the previously-
accepted version.
Read more :
pauleisen.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/against-good-breeding-understanding.html



























































































































''
This kind of disgusting and disrespectful behaviour is condoned here

ORANGEAID verbal abuse

''Cinta is a whore.
I don't change one word I've said.''

truth-zone.net/forum/members-area/67105-open-up-the-clarity-zone-to-all-tz-members-we-need-transparency-and-not-secrecy.html?start=80#209733
Last Edit: 20 Oct 2014 14:21 by Cinta.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

''Against Good Breeding: Understanding Jewish Opposition to Eugenics '' 20 Oct 2014 14:00 #2

  • Orangeaid
  • Orangeaid's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 11634
  • Likes received: 8018
Really?

The matriarch of US eugenics, Margaret Sanger, who moved on from wanting to exterminate all blacks via eugenics to being the Queen of the abortion industry was married to a German Jew.
. In 1902 she married William Sanger who was a German Jew and a political leftist radical; Margaret wasted no time in imposing strict sexual restraints on his behaviour with her, for she had no intentions of following her mother’s path. In fact, they had two children. It was William who introduced her to militant socialism and atheism. They went to live in Greenwich Village where they surrounded themselves with all the leftist radicals of the day.

“Ten years after her marriage Margaret Sanger started writing a column for the New York Call entitled “What Every Girl Should Know.” She also distributed a pamphlet, Family Limitation, to married women. Sanger repeatedly caused outrage and risked imprisonment by acting in defiance of the Comstock Law of 1873, which had specifically outlawed the dissemination of contraceptive information and devices, such being regarded as obscene at that time.
firstlightforum.wordpress.com/2011/04/02/jewish-baby-murderer-margaret-sanger-mother-of-the-american-abortion-holocaust/

... care to rethink the OP .. which is clearly designed to reinforce the lies of NSDAP eugenics and the "good Jew" fallacy.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: PFIZIPFEI

''Against Good Breeding: Understanding Jewish Opposition to Eugenics '' 20 Oct 2014 14:28 #3

  • Orangeaid
  • Orangeaid's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 11634
  • Likes received: 8018
I've responded to the thread title.

Barbara Lerner Specter also seems to have no problem in destroying the White European race ... and she's a Jew.



Edit: why did you delete your post?
Last Edit: 20 Oct 2014 14:30 by Orangeaid.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: PFIZIPFEI

''Against Good Breeding: Understanding Jewish Opposition to Eugenics '' 20 Oct 2014 14:30 #4

  • Cinta
  • Cinta's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Never Again
  • ''None are more hopelessly enslaved,than those who falsely believe they are free
  • Posts: 5333
  • Likes received: 1066
Orangeaid wrote:
Really?

The matriarch of US eugenics, Margaret Sanger, who moved on from wanting to exterminate all blacks via eugenics to being the Queen of the abortion industry was married to a German Jew.
. In 1902 she married William Sanger who was a German Jew and a political leftist radical; Margaret wasted no time in imposing strict sexual restraints on his behaviour with her, for she had no intentions of following her mother’s path. In fact, they had two children. It was William who introduced her to militant socialism and atheism. They went to live in Greenwich Village where they surrounded themselves with all the leftist radicals of the day.

“Ten years after her marriage Margaret Sanger started writing a column for the New York Call entitled “What Every Girl Should Know.” She also distributed a pamphlet, Family Limitation, to married women. Sanger repeatedly caused outrage and risked imprisonment by acting in defiance of the Comstock Law of 1873, which had specifically outlawed the dissemination of contraceptive information and devices, such being regarded as obscene at that time.
firstlightforum.wordpress.com/2011/04/02/jewish-baby-murderer-margaret-sanger-mother-of-the-american-abortion-holocaust/

... care to rethink the OP .. which is clearly designed to reinforce the lies of NSDAP eugenics and the "good Jew" fallacy.

Yes so ?
My OP is not about this woman........
This kind of disgusting and disrespectful behaviour is condoned here

ORANGEAID verbal abuse

''Cinta is a whore.
I don't change one word I've said.''

truth-zone.net/forum/members-area/67105-open-up-the-clarity-zone-to-all-tz-members-we-need-transparency-and-not-secrecy.html?start=80#209733
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

''Against Good Breeding: Understanding Jewish Opposition to Eugenics '' 20 Oct 2014 14:33 #5

  • Orangeaid
  • Orangeaid's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 11634
  • Likes received: 8018
I'm pointing out that your OP is flawed in light of Jew support of eugenics via Margaret Sanger and Barbara Lerner Specter.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: PFIZIPFEI

''Against Good Breeding: Understanding Jewish Opposition to Eugenics '' 20 Oct 2014 14:33 #6

  • Cinta
  • Cinta's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Never Again
  • ''None are more hopelessly enslaved,than those who falsely believe they are free
  • Posts: 5333
  • Likes received: 1066
Orangeaid wrote:
I've responded to the thread title.

Barbara Lerner Specter also seems to have no problem in destroying the White European race ... and she's a Jew.



Edit: why did you delete your post?

Because I can and whats it to you pffff
But will tell you why.
There is a huge empty space under the article and I tried to
shorten it; didn't work though.

Maybe read the article ;ya might even like it .

Yes Barbara Lerner is crazy.
This kind of disgusting and disrespectful behaviour is condoned here

ORANGEAID verbal abuse

''Cinta is a whore.
I don't change one word I've said.''

truth-zone.net/forum/members-area/67105-open-up-the-clarity-zone-to-all-tz-members-we-need-transparency-and-not-secrecy.html?start=80#209733
Last Edit: 20 Oct 2014 14:37 by Cinta.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

''Against Good Breeding: Understanding Jewish Opposition to Eugenics '' 20 Oct 2014 14:36 #7

  • Orangeaid
  • Orangeaid's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 11634
  • Likes received: 8018
I like Paul Eisen ... He founded Jews for Justice for Germans ... he's also a self-proclaimed holocaust denier.

Does he deny the NSDAP had a eugenics program ... just like he denies they had a "Final Solution"?

Maybe you could watch this video.

"Jewishness, Orwell, Eugenics & Stolen Foreskins: An Interview With Philosopher Gilad Atzmon"

Last Edit: 20 Oct 2014 14:40 by Orangeaid.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: PFIZIPFEI

''Against Good Breeding: Understanding Jewish Opposition to Eugenics '' 20 Oct 2014 14:44 #8

  • Orangeaid
  • Orangeaid's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 11634
  • Likes received: 8018
@Cinta ... the OP is just reinforcing the Holocaust lies ... or at least trying to and sustaining the Jew hostility to their nemesis the NSDAP and Hitler.

Paul Eisen is a Jewish holocaust denier ... He'd be lost too by the third paragraph like I was I'd expect.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy, PFIZIPFEI

''Against Good Breeding: Understanding Jewish Opposition to Eugenics '' 20 Oct 2014 14:46 #9

  • Cinta
  • Cinta's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Never Again
  • ''None are more hopelessly enslaved,than those who falsely believe they are free
  • Posts: 5333
  • Likes received: 1066
Orangeaid wrote:
I like Paul Eisen ... He founded Jews for Justice for Germans ... he's also a self-proclaimed holocaust denier.

Does he deny the NSDAP had a eugenics program ... just like he denies they had a "Final Solution"?

Maybe you could watch this video.

"Jewishness, Orwell, Eugenics & Stolen Foreskins: An Interview With Philosopher Gilad Atzmon"


yeah thank you ....watching.
This kind of disgusting and disrespectful behaviour is condoned here

ORANGEAID verbal abuse

''Cinta is a whore.
I don't change one word I've said.''

truth-zone.net/forum/members-area/67105-open-up-the-clarity-zone-to-all-tz-members-we-need-transparency-and-not-secrecy.html?start=80#209733
Last Edit: 20 Oct 2014 14:50 by Cinta.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

''Against Good Breeding: Understanding Jewish Opposition to Eugenics '' 20 Oct 2014 15:20 #10

  • Orangeaid
  • Orangeaid's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 11634
  • Likes received: 8018
This is more Jew BS. Jews aren't smarter than anyone else. Einstein for a start stole his theories.

Jews get ahead through their Talmudic ways which goys have been ignorant of ... until the information age. Further, Jews practice extreme nepotism such that in some sectors unless you're a Jew you don't get a look in and Jews get all the opportunities ... like Hollywood.
'Jews have practiced eugenics since ancient times. Moreover, eugenics is an integral part of Judaism, and of the evolution of the Jewish people themselves.

Eugenics is thought to be responsible for their higher average IQ, and consequently, for their higher incomes and disproportionate success in virtually all fields of endeavor. Richard Lynn has written extensively on this subject, and has estimated the average IQ of Jews worldwide to be 110.[3] Nathaniel Weyl proposed an interesting
theory to explain how this IQ advantage came about.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: PFIZIPFEI

''Against Good Breeding: Understanding Jewish Opposition to Eugenics '' 20 Oct 2014 15:37 #11

  • Cinta
  • Cinta's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Never Again
  • ''None are more hopelessly enslaved,than those who falsely believe they are free
  • Posts: 5333
  • Likes received: 1066
Orangeaid wrote:
This is more Jew BS. Jews aren't smarter than anyone else. Einstein for a start stole his theories.

Jews get ahead through their Talmudic ways which goys have been ignorant of ... until the information age. Further, Jews practice extreme nepotism such that in some sectors unless you're a Jew you don't get a look in and Jews get all the opportunities ... like Hollywood.
'Jews have practiced eugenics since ancient times. Moreover, eugenics is an integral part of Judaism, and of the evolution of the Jewish people themselves.

Eugenics is thought to be responsible for their higher average IQ, and consequently, for their higher incomes and disproportionate success in virtually all fields of endeavor. Richard Lynn has written extensively on this subject, and has estimated the average IQ of Jews worldwide to be 110.[3] Nathaniel Weyl proposed an interesting
theory to explain how this IQ advantage came about.

Yes for a lot of Jews that might be the case.
The well educated and religious jews in Holland are to themselfs
and don't involve in Dutch culture at all.
Most are rich too.
I once knew a religious Jewish ballet dancer and we didn't get along at all
not sure why but it might have been me .......... lol
This kind of disgusting and disrespectful behaviour is condoned here

ORANGEAID verbal abuse

''Cinta is a whore.
I don't change one word I've said.''

truth-zone.net/forum/members-area/67105-open-up-the-clarity-zone-to-all-tz-members-we-need-transparency-and-not-secrecy.html?start=80#209733
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

''Against Good Breeding: Understanding Jewish Opposition to Eugenics '' 20 Oct 2014 15:47 #12

  • Orangeaid
  • Orangeaid's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 11634
  • Likes received: 8018
That was your mum.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

''Against Good Breeding: Understanding Jewish Opposition to Eugenics '' 20 Oct 2014 16:59 #13

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20376
  • Likes received: 7951
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 20 Oct 2014 17:15 by PFIZIPFEI.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

''Against Good Breeding: Understanding Jewish Opposition to Eugenics '' 20 Oct 2014 17:55 #14

  • Cinta
  • Cinta's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Never Again
  • ''None are more hopelessly enslaved,than those who falsely believe they are free
  • Posts: 5333
  • Likes received: 1066
Orangeaid wrote:
That was your mum.

Me Mom's a nice Aryan looking nurse ; sweetest Mom in the world !!!!

What about your Mom Sir ?
This kind of disgusting and disrespectful behaviour is condoned here

ORANGEAID verbal abuse

''Cinta is a whore.
I don't change one word I've said.''

truth-zone.net/forum/members-area/67105-open-up-the-clarity-zone-to-all-tz-members-we-need-transparency-and-not-secrecy.html?start=80#209733
Last Edit: 20 Oct 2014 17:56 by Cinta.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

''Against Good Breeding: Understanding Jewish Opposition to Eugenics '' 20 Oct 2014 18:07 #15

  • Cinta
  • Cinta's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Never Again
  • ''None are more hopelessly enslaved,than those who falsely believe they are free
  • Posts: 5333
  • Likes received: 1066
PFIZIPFEI wrote:
Ofcourse hasbara excists ;I ain't one them though.

Euthanasia is a bit more complicated. to answer.
I can think of a situations where I can agree with
the intentional ending of a life .

What are your views on euthanasia ?
Is it legal in Germany?
This kind of disgusting and disrespectful behaviour is condoned here

ORANGEAID verbal abuse

''Cinta is a whore.
I don't change one word I've said.''

truth-zone.net/forum/members-area/67105-open-up-the-clarity-zone-to-all-tz-members-we-need-transparency-and-not-secrecy.html?start=80#209733
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

''Against Good Breeding: Understanding Jewish Opposition to Eugenics '' 20 Oct 2014 18:15 #16

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20376
  • Likes received: 7951
Cinta wrote:
PFIZIPFEI wrote:
Ofcourse hasbara excists ;I ain't one them though.

Euthanasia is a bit more complicated. to answer.
I can think of a situations where I can agree with
the intentional ending of a life .

What are your views on euthanasia ?
Is it legal in Germany?


Happens on a legal daily basis to thousands since 1945.
.
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

''Against Good Breeding: Understanding Jewish Opposition to Eugenics '' 20 Oct 2014 18:22 #17

  • Cinta
  • Cinta's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Never Again
  • ''None are more hopelessly enslaved,than those who falsely believe they are free
  • Posts: 5333
  • Likes received: 1066
PFIZIPFEI wrote:
Cinta wrote:
PFIZIPFEI wrote:
Ofcourse hasbara excists ;I ain't one them though.

Euthanasia is a bit more complicated. to answer.
I can think of a situations where I can agree with
the intentional ending of a life .

What are your views on euthanasia ?
Is it legal in Germany?


Happens on a legal daily basis to thousands since 1945.
.

Euthanasia : refers to the practice of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve pain and suffering.''
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euthanasia

What are your views on euthanasia ?
Do you agree ?
This kind of disgusting and disrespectful behaviour is condoned here

ORANGEAID verbal abuse

''Cinta is a whore.
I don't change one word I've said.''

truth-zone.net/forum/members-area/67105-open-up-the-clarity-zone-to-all-tz-members-we-need-transparency-and-not-secrecy.html?start=80#209733
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

''Against Good Breeding: Understanding Jewish Opposition to Eugenics '' 20 Oct 2014 18:37 #18

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20376
  • Likes received: 7951
Cinta wrote:
PFIZIPFEI wrote:
Cinta wrote:
PFIZIPFEI wrote:
Ofcourse hasbara excists ;I ain't one them though.

Euthanasia is a bit more complicated. to answer.
I can think of a situations where I can agree with
the intentional ending of a life .

What are your views on euthanasia ?
Is it legal in Germany?


Happens on a legal daily basis to thousands since 1945.
.

Euthanasia : refers to the practice of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve pain and suffering.''
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euthanasia

What are your views on euthanasia ?
Do you agree ?


Too lazy to search the forum, better start another hasbara thread :hmm:

truth-zone.net/forum/the-lounge/62717-should-assisted-suicide-be-legalized.html
truth-zone.net/forum/general-discussion/62741-belgium-introduces-death-penalty-without-trial-for-minors-or-euthanasia.html

Can you read on your own or do I have to repeat what I said before, because Ms Hasbara is too lazy?
And I can't remember what you said is your opinion on ritual genital mutilation of newborns?
.
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Last Edit: 20 Oct 2014 18:40 by PFIZIPFEI.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

''Against Good Breeding: Understanding Jewish Opposition to Eugenics '' 20 Oct 2014 18:45 #19

  • Cinta
  • Cinta's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Never Again
  • ''None are more hopelessly enslaved,than those who falsely believe they are free
  • Posts: 5333
  • Likes received: 1066
PFIZIPFEI wrote:
Cinta wrote:
PFIZIPFEI wrote:
Cinta wrote:
PFIZIPFEI wrote:
Ofcourse hasbara excists ;I ain't one them though.

Euthanasia is a bit more complicated. to answer.
I can think of a situations where I can agree with
the intentional ending of a life .

What are your views on euthanasia ?
Is it legal in Germany?


Happens on a legal daily basis to thousands since 1945.
.

Euthanasia : refers to the practice of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve pain and suffering.''
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euthanasia

What are your views on euthanasia ?
Do you agree ?


Too lazy to search the forum, better start another hasbara thread :hmm:

truth-zone.net/forum/the-lounge/62717-should-assisted-suicide-be-legalized.html
truth-zone.net/forum/general-discussion/62741-belgium-introduces-death-penalty-without-trial-for-minors-or-euthanasia.html

Can you read on your own or do I have to repeat what I said before, because Ms Hasbara is too lazy?
.

What you wrote here is not a clear yes or no to me and what is wrong with writting me your opinion
here and now ? maybe you are too lazy ?

Pfiz wrote :
In a natural system this would be no matter of legal or illegal.
But right now we are still accepting this anti-nature, anti-humans, anti-freedom ... system and as long as we do so the biggest freedom we can expect being granted by the masters, the greedy and bloodthirsty minority, is to decide on our own how and when we leave it through the door with "death" written on it.
The situation is worse than most are able to grasp.
But it's a sunny day (here) and I don't want to spoil it.''

I can think of stuations where people suffer and are in so much pain.
and death is postponed .
Would you let them suffer ?
This kind of disgusting and disrespectful behaviour is condoned here

ORANGEAID verbal abuse

''Cinta is a whore.
I don't change one word I've said.''

truth-zone.net/forum/members-area/67105-open-up-the-clarity-zone-to-all-tz-members-we-need-transparency-and-not-secrecy.html?start=80#209733
Last Edit: 20 Oct 2014 18:48 by Cinta.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

''Against Good Breeding: Understanding Jewish Opposition to Eugenics '' 20 Oct 2014 23:50 #20

  • Orangeaid
  • Orangeaid's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 11634
  • Likes received: 8018


JEWISH EUGENICS AND THE MASTER RACE

NO OTHER DOCUMENT IN WORLD HISTORY has done more in creating a political class with a distinct racialagenda than the Balfour Declaration.

Succumbing to Jewish pressure in the midst of WWI due to its need for funding from Jewish banks, Britain surrendered its autonomy and eventually its empire when a letter addressed to ‘Lord’ Walter Rothschild from British Foreign Secretary, Arthur Balfour, was made public:

“His Majesty’s government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object…”

The key visible figure manoeuvering the British government into this commitment was Jewish chemist, Chaim Weizmann, who rose to prominence in England for developing a method of producing acetone from maize which was needed for the production of artillery shells.

Weizmann, like many of his Jewish co-religionists, promoted the initiative to transfer all Arab residents out of Palestine in spite of contradicting the Balfour Declaration’s proviso insuring the “civil rights of existing non-Jewish communities.”

The ethnic cleansing of Palestinians (and the ethnic perpetuation of Jewry) was now in place.

By 1930, specific plans for “the transfer of Palestinians” were refined by leaders such as Ben-Gurion, Golda Meir, and Moshe Allon. Meeting for years on a biweekly basis in the “Red House” in Tel Aviv, these leaders agreed on the ‘necessity’ of carrying out the following steps:

• Killing Palestinian Leadership
• Assassinating Palestinian Political & Financial Supporters
• Damaging Palestinian Transportation
• Poisoning Palestinian Wells

With their plan fulfilled all that was left for International Jewry to embark upon was to insure the maintenance and propagation of their ‘master race.’

PREPARING THE MASTER RACE

AS AN ARDENT ZIONIST, Benjamin Disraeli, late 19th century prime minister of England and a converted Jew to Christianity, exalted in the destiny of Jews as a “race.”

Building on the foundation of Disraeli’s racial views, key Jewish figures during the makings of the Balfour Declaration and long before Hitler’s rise to power, proposed a “eugenics” program toensure “racially healthy” reproduction among their own: “the best of people.”



Jews played an active role in early eugenics from 1916 thru 1947. Names such as Rabbi Max Reichler, Richard Goldschmidt, and Hermann Muller, were part of a movement that praised the Jews for being of “uniquely superior stock” and possessing a “native endowment of brains.”

According to the National Library in Jerusalem, between 1920 and 1950, some two hundred Parents’ Manuals for Jewish couples were publishedin Palestine. These publicationscontained a Zionist worldview of which eugenics formed an integral part, subjecting Jewish mothers to an unremitting program of education, indoctrination and regulation.

One of the most prominent Jewish eugenicists of this period was Dr Joseph Meir, for whom the hospital in Kfar Sava is named, exhorted his co-religionists in 1934 to embrace the idea of racial engineering:

“For us, eugenics as a whole, and the prevention of the transmission of hereditary disorders in particular, is of even greater value than for all other nations!” View Entire Story Here,Here & Here.

ENACTING THE MASTER PLAN

TODAY’S STATE OF ISRAEL, under a politically correct veneer, still practices eugenic-inspired family planning with more fertility clinics per capita than in any other nation.

When Israel declared itself an official State in 1948, Jewry no longer saw itself primarily as a “religious group” but also as a “political-racial” entity.



Thus the state of Israel defines itself as a “Jewish state” — not religiously, but racially. Any Jew who can prove his birth from a Jewish mother regardless of whether he goes to synagogue or not can instantly become a citizen of Israel.

Every state wants to expand its power for political reasons.

But for Israel, (in its quest for a Greater Israel), with Palestine being the crossroads of Europe, Asia and Africa — as its strategiccenter for world control — is doing what no other state throughout history has ever done before.

And that’s to ever-expand its frontiers so as to advance though a nuclear-armed military the anti-Christ cause of a Jewishborderless entity spread throughout the world. And that’s scary



www.realjewnews.com/?p=656
Last Edit: 20 Oct 2014 23:52 by Orangeaid.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: PFIZIPFEI
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2
Moderators: novum, rodin, Flare
Powered by Kunena Forum

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it. Secure transactions via paypal.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2020 - May 2021, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 255 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 70 - Raised
( £ 53 GBP )
donation thermometer
21%
Most Recent Donation $50 USD
28th August 2020

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.