Your donations are appreciated and help keep this site running. Even the smallest amount helps.
Thankyou

 
PROMOTE YOUR SITE
HERE
Only $3 USD/month
TRUTHSPOON.COM
The man they can't recruit!
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: The Holocaust Deniers Triad of Traits

The Holocaust Deniers Triad of Traits 06 Dec 2016 21:55 #281

  • Frothy
  • Frothy's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Released
  • Posts: 17535
  • Likes received: 1811
@Exorcist
Rudolf's claim (p. 298) that the doors of the gas chambers were insufficiently strong to "withstand a pressure of several tons produced by several hundred panicking people pressing against it" does not bear examination. It is true that the gas chamber was crowded, but the question is how the "several hundred panicking people" would have been able to bring pressure to bear on the door. If there was panic, most of the resulting "pressure" would have been born by other people, who would have been crushed, and by the walls, which would have stood. In the end, the only pressure that could be applied to the door would be that of a couple of people closest to it - people who themselves would have been more likely than not crushed by the others. Instead of a pressure of "several tons," there would have been very little pressure. The doors did not need to be particularly strong. It is important to note here that while the original proposal by Dejaco to transform morgue 1 into a homicidal gas chamber, drawn in December 1942, envisioned the construction of an outward-opening double door of 200 cm width, Bischoff's letter of March 31, 1943, mentioned by Rudolf on p. 304 of his affidavit, shows that this double door had been replaced by a smaller single-panel door of 100 cm width - with the remaining 100 cm of the original opening most likely having been filled with bricks, or perhaps by a more permanent, unmovable and strongly anchored panel (this part of both crematoria 2 and 3 is so much ruined that it is impossible to say how the remaining 100 cm was actually filled up). This arrangement was, of course, much stronger, and offered also a better seal.

It is in this context important to address the suggestion made by Rudolf on p. 305.

The change of the door from morgue 1 from opening inwards to opening outwards might as well have a very simple and innocent explanation: Due to capacity restrictions of crematoria, they are normally equipped with morgues for storing corpses of victims of infectious diseases. Spotted fever claimed many lives at the Birkenau camp, and since morgue 1 was the only morgue equipped with both an air-intake and exhaust, it is most likely that the victims of this epidemic were temporarily stored there. Intelligent ventilation design causes a slight under-pressure in such morgues to prevent the nauseous gases developed by stored corpses from entering the rest of the building. Under such circumstances any double door would have to open outwards in order to stay closed.(p. 305)

While this may be true of a door which has no locking mechanism, the gas doors in question had two heavy iron or steel latches which ensured that the door could not open from the inside. In any case, even if this had been the reason why the doors opened outwards, the question is why this design feature was only introduced in December 1942 (there had been a serious typhus epidemic in the camp in August 1942)? Was it an afterthought? Did the architects of the Central Construction Office simply forget throughout the twelve months of design development that preceded Dejaco's modification of the basement arrangement that the under-pressure would cause a problem for the inwards opening doors? If the doors had opened outwards from the beginning of the design development, Rudolf might have a point. But it concerned a modification that occurred very late in the design development, as the building was already under construction. This makes all the difference.

Finally, in this section of his report, as in others, Rudolf neither presents any positive evidence to support his argument nor makes any attempt to reconcile it with the evidence as a whole. If Rudolf is sincere in proposing that the redesign of Leichenkeller 1 to include a ventilation system to simultaneously introduce fresh air and extract foul air and a gas tight door which opened outwards was intended merely to cater for the storage of corpses who had died of typhus, one may ask why he does not address any of the following questions:

a) why should the gas-tight door require a peep hole of double 8 mm glass with a metal grill on the inside?

b) why was morgue 2, the "undressing room," which was about 40% larger than morgue 1, not supplied with a gastight door and a similar ventilation system in preference or in addition to morgue 1?

c) why was the room equipped with 14 showers (a feasible alternative use if the room was to be used as a gas chamber; not so if it was to be used for the storage of the corpses of typhus victims)?

d) why should the redesign involve removal of the adjacent corpse-slide, the transfer of the basement staircase to the other side of the building, and a change in the direction in which the doors of the morgue opened from inwards to outwards, all of which would significantly hamper the introduction of corpses?

e) why should the room be provided with four wire-mesh introduction devices with wooden covers?

And then, of course, there is this one issue that ought to have given Rudolf some concern: when he set out to "research" Auschwitz, he observed that the walls of the delousing chambers of BW5a and BW5b were covered with blue stains. If, indeed, the gas-tight door of morgue 1 had been installed to allow that room to become a Zyklon B delousing room, why did he not find any blue stains on the remaining walls of that space? Or was it a delousing room that was never used? mailstar.net/holocaust-debate14.html

Afaik it has nothing to do with Nizkor but hay-ho, if the information is not to your liking then you won't like the source.



The word you're looking for is Gasdichtetür (top right) next to Brausen (showers 14)

Here's the IHR
The fourteen shower heads mentioned in the June 24, 1943 transfer documents for crematorium III were genuine. To support the argument that the fourteen shower heads in the transfer documents were fake, it would be necessary to conclude that real showers were planned, but then a month later were replaced with fake ones. Indeed, the traditional narrative holds that morgue 1 of crematorium II had been used for two months before this report to gas people in a room equipped with fake shower heads. Because crematorium III was supposed to have a comparable function, it would mean that morgue 1 of crematorium III was originally meant to have fake showers, then real ones, and then fake ones again. This is not believable.
"Undressing rooms" are meant in the ordinary mortuary sense, not in any special sense. Bischoff originally suggested the location of the showers in an undressing room, which means that the room was understood to be an undressing room before the showers were contemplated. This can only mean that the word "undressing room" is being used in an ordinary mortuary sense, that is, as a space where bodies are cleaned and prepared before burial, or in this case, cremation.www.ihr.org/jhr/v20/v20n2p17_crowell.html

The same yelp as Rudolf, but they still don't explain why there would be a large ''undressing room'' and ''shower room'' in a morgue? Nor do they mention the ''gas tight door'' on the same inventory list. Is it usual practice in Germany to have ''undressing rooms'' and ''shower rooms'' in morgues? And why no mention of the gas tight door?
Jews LARPing as Nazis
Last Edit: 07 Dec 2016 10:48 by Frothy.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust Deniers Triad of Traits 07 Dec 2016 07:52 #282

  • Frothy
  • Frothy's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Released
  • Posts: 17535
  • Likes received: 1811
The Nuremberg Trials Were a "Farce
of Justice" Staged for the Benefit of
the Jews

These trials did not result in either "rubber stamp" guilty verdicts or
identical sentences. In fact, of the 21 defendants, three were set free; one
received a 10-year sentence; one a 15-year sentence; two, 20-year
sentences; three, life sentences, and 11 received the death penalty.
The defendants, moreover, had access to 206 attorneys, 136 of whom had
been Nazi party members. Furthermore, as Raul Hilberg stated, "The
judges in Nuremberg were established American lawyers. They had not
come to exonerate or convict. They were impressed with their task, and
they approached it with much experience in the law and Little anticipation
of the facts."
A second round of trials resulted in 25 death sentences, 20 life sentences,
97 sentences of 25 years or less, and 35 not-guilty verdicts. By 1951,
following the recommendations of an American-run clemency board, 77 (of)
the 142 convicted criminals had been released from prison.
www.d93schools.org/userfiles/163/Classes/1777/06_post-holocaust_persecution_and_denial.pdf?id=2340
Jews LARPing as Nazis
Last Edit: 07 Dec 2016 10:49 by Frothy.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust Affirmer's Minorah of Lying Traits 07 Dec 2016 08:50 #283

  • hokuspokus
  • hokuspokus's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 1090
  • Likes received: 345
Ausrotten wrote:
@Exorcist
Rudolf's claim (p. 298) that the doors of the gas chambers were insufficiently strong to "withstand a pressure of several tons produced by several hundred panicking people pressing against it" does not bear examination. It is true that the gas chamber was crowded, but the question is how the "several hundred panicking people" would have been able to bring pressure to bear on the door. If there was panic, most of the resulting "pressure" would have been born by other people, who would have been crushed, and by the walls, which would have stood. In the end, the only pressure that could be applied to the door would be that of a couple of people closest to it - people who themselves would have been more likely than not crushed by the others. Instead of a pressure of "several tons," there would have been very little pressure. The doors did not need to be particularly strong. It is important to note here that while the original proposal by Dejaco to transform morgue 1 into a homicidal gas chamber, drawn in December 1942, envisioned the construction of an outward-opening double door of 200 cm width, Bischoff's letter of March 31, 1943, mentioned by Rudolf on p. 304 of his affidavit, shows that this double door had been replaced by a smaller single-panel door of 100 cm width - with the remaining 100 cm of the original opening most likely having been filled with bricks, or perhaps by a more permanent, unmovable and strongly anchored panel (this part of both crematoria 2 and 3 is so much ruined that it is impossible to say how the remaining 100 cm was actually filled up). This arrangement was, of course, much stronger, and offered also a better seal.

It is in this context important to address the suggestion made by Rudolf on p. 305.

The change of the door from morgue 1 from opening inwards to opening outwards might as well have a very simple and innocent explanation: Due to capacity restrictions of crematoria, they are normally equipped with morgues for storing corpses of victims of infectious diseases. Spotted fever claimed many lives at the Birkenau camp, and since morgue 1 was the only morgue equipped with both an air-intake and exhaust, it is most likely that the victims of this epidemic were temporarily stored there. Intelligent ventilation design causes a slight under-pressure in such morgues to prevent the nauseous gases developed by stored corpses from entering the rest of the building. Under such circumstances any double door would have to open outwards in order to stay closed.(p. 305)

While this may be true of a door which has no locking mechanism, the gas doors in question had two heavy iron or steel latches which ensured that the door could not open from the inside. In any case, even if this had been the reason why the doors opened outwards, the question is why this design feature was only introduced in December 1942 (there had been a serious typhus epidemic in the camp in August 1942)? Was it an afterthought? Did the architects of the Central Construction Office simply forget throughout the twelve months of design development that preceded Dejaco's modification of the basement arrangement that the under-pressure would cause a problem for the inwards opening doors? If the doors had opened outwards from the beginning of the design development, Rudolf might have a point. But it concerned a modification that occurred very late in the design development, as the building was already under construction. This makes all the difference.

Finally, in this section of his report, as in others, Rudolf neither presents any positive evidence to support his argument nor makes any attempt to reconcile it with the evidence as a whole. If Rudolf is sincere in proposing that the redesign of Leichenkeller 1 to include a ventilation system to simultaneously introduce fresh air and extract foul air and a gas tight door which opened outwards was intended merely to cater for the storage of corpses who had died of typhus, one may ask why he does not address any of the following questions:

a) why should the gas-tight door require a peep hole of double 8 mm glass with a metal grill on the inside?

b) why was morgue 2, the "undressing room," which was about 40% larger than morgue 1, not supplied with a gastight door and a similar ventilation system in preference or in addition to morgue 1?

c) why was the room equipped with 14 showers (a feasible alternative use if the room was to be used as a gas chamber; not so if it was to be used for the storage of the corpses of typhus victims)?

d) why should the redesign involve removal of the adjacent corpse-slide, the transfer of the basement staircase to the other side of the building, and a change in the direction in which the doors of the morgue opened from inwards to outwards, all of which would significantly hamper the introduction of corpses?

e) why should the room be provided with four wire-mesh introduction devices with wooden covers?

And then, of course, there is this one issue that ought to have given Rudolf some concern: when he set out to "research" Auschwitz, he observed that the walls of the delousing chambers of BW5a and BW5b were covered with blue stains. If, indeed, the gas-tight door of morgue 1 had been installed to allow that room to become a Zyklon B delousing room, why did he not find any blue stains on the remaining walls of that space? Or was it a delousing room that was never used? mailstar.net/holocaust-debate14.html

Afaik it has nothing to do with Nizkor but hay-ho, if the information is not to your liking then you won't like the source.



The word you're looking for is Gasdichtetür (top right) next to Brausen (showers 14)

Here's the IHR
The fourteen shower heads mentioned in the June 24, 1943 transfer documents for crematorium III were genuine. To support the argument that the fourteen shower heads in the transfer documents were fake, it would be necessary to conclude that real showers were planned, but then a month later were replaced with fake ones. Indeed, the traditional narrative holds that morgue 1 of crematorium II had been used for two months before this report to gas people in a room equipped with fake shower heads. Because crematorium III was supposed to have a comparable function, it would mean that morgue 1 of crematorium III was originally meant to have fake showers, then real ones, and then fake ones again. This is not believable.
"Undressing rooms" are meant in the ordinary mortuary sense, not in any special sense. Bischoff originally suggested the location of the showers in an undressing room, which means that the room was understood to be an undressing room before the showers were contemplated. This can only mean that the word "undressing room" is being used in an ordinary mortuary sense, that is, as a space where bodies are cleaned and prepared before burial, or in this case, cremation.www.ihr.org/jhr/v20/v20n2p17_crowell.html

The same yelp as Rudolf, but they still don't explain why there would be a large ''undressing room'' and ''shower room'' in a morgue? Nor do they mention the ''gas tight door'' on the same inventory list. Is it usual practice in Germany to have ''undressing rooms'' and ''shower rooms'' in morgues? And why no mention of the gas tight door?

It's unlike you to post a qoute out of context in order to support an argument.

If you quoted the whole article from the ihr everyone will see that you blow your
own argument out of the water.

I shall give you 48 hours to correct your error. I am a fair person and I assume that
this is merely an oversight. However should you choose not to do so I shall post
the whole content and your credibility and honour will be gone.

It's up to you now........
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Gaia

The Holocaust Affirmers Minorah of Lying Traits 07 Dec 2016 08:53 #284

Exorcist wrote:
You forgot to mention the Nazi Party was a Jewish Bankster creation. Hitler was a hypochondriac puppet with severe psychotic
mental disorders controlled by the Jewish inner circle of advisors. These included (((Goebels))), (((Himmler))), Honeypot (((Eva Braun))),
Hitler's Jewish Doctors (((Bloch))) and ((( Morrel))) who controlled him via cocain. Hence the lunatic Nazi strategic conduct
of WWII which was indoctrinated into Hitler by his inner circle of Jewish advisors and designed to fail!.

The two World Wars were planned and created by Jewish Zionists by means of their control of the usary banking system.
They controlled both sides.
The excess cremation oven capacity was planned and scripted in advance to back up the "extermination" lie.
There were (((66))) ovens?........what a (((surprise)))..... :larf:

Read the (((Max Nordau))) Speech at a Paris Zionist meeting after the 6th Zionist Congress Conference in Basle (1905)
“‘Now this great progressive world power, England, has after the pogroms of Kishineff, in token of her sympathy with our poor people, offered through the Zionist Congress the autonomous colony of Uganda to the Jewish nation. Of course, Uganda is in Africa, and Africa is not Zion and never will be Zion, to quote Herzl’s own words. But Herzl knows full well that nothing is so valuable to the cause of Zionism as amicable political relations with such a power as England is, and so much more valuable as England’s main interest is concentrated in the Orient. Nowhere else is precedent as powerful as in England, and so it is most important to accept a colony out of the hands of England and create thus a precedent in our favor. Sooner or later the Oriental question will have to be solved, and the Oriental question means, naturally, also the question of Palestine. England, who had addressed a formal, political note to the Zionist Congress—the Zionist Congress which is pledged to the Basle program, England will have the deciding voice in the final solution of the Oriental question, and Herzl has considered it his duty to maintain valuable relations with this great and progressive power. Herzl knows that we stand before a tremendous upheaval of the whole world. Soon, perhaps, some kind of a world-congress will have to be called, and England, the great, free and powerful England, will then continue the work it has begun with its generous offer to the Sixth Congress. And if you ask me now what has Israel to do in Uganda, then let me tell you as the answer the words of the statesmen of Sardinia, only applied to our case and given in our version; let me tell you the following words as if I were showing you the rungs of a ladder leading upward and upward: Herzl, The Zionist Congress, the English Uganda proposition, the future world war, the peace conference where with the help of England a free and Jewish Palestine will be created.’

http://www.jrbooksonline.com/intl_jew_full_version/ij14.htm

@(((Rat)))

Please explain Nordau's pre-knowledge of the coming World Wars and the Balfour Declaration in 1905!!!!..... :iitm:

It says the coming world war which was the 1914-1918 war not world wars. ;)
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust Affirmer's Minorah of Lying Traits 07 Dec 2016 08:56 #285

hokuspokus wrote:
It's unlike you to post a qoute out of context in order to support an argument.


I shall give you 48 hours to correct your error. I am a fair person and I assume that
this is merely an oversight. However should you choose not to do so I shall post
the whole content and your credibility and honour will be gone.

It's up to you now........

:larf:

Credibility and honour gone!!! :larf:
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Frothy

The Holocaust Affirmer's Minorah of Lying Traits 07 Dec 2016 09:37 #286

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20376
  • Likes received: 7951
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Frothy

The Holocaust Affirmer's Minorah of Lying Traits 07 Dec 2016 11:15 #287

  • Frothy
  • Frothy's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Released
  • Posts: 17535
  • Likes received: 1811
Hokey, Im not going to post up the entire IHR article because it was only a section that I excerpted for the purpose of answering Exorcist's request.

The nearest there is to an explanation is this;
The dual use of the crematoriums for hygienic purposes may have included the installation of ad hoc disinfestation stations. The apparent plan to temporarily install Topf hot air delousing facilities in crematorium II fits with the fact that showers were actually installed at the same period of time. Facing tremendous hygienic problems, the camp authorities obviously attempted to convert the basements of the crematoriums into a hygiene center with inmate showers and delousing facilities for their clothes.
www.ihr.org/jhr/v20/v20n2p17_crowell.html

But you fail to see the problem with this, I'll explain again but I'm not intending to circle jerk the point.

In the first part of the IHR article that I posted and you quoted it states that '' "Undressing rooms" are meant in the ordinary mortuary sense, not in any special sense'' but what sense would there be in having a delousing room/undressing room/shower room, in a morgue?

The ''ordinary mortuary sense'' is not a ''delousing chamber'' is it?

Why no mention of the gas tight door on the same inventory list as the 14 shower heads?

And as previously stated on the other article that you quoted from my same post, ''And then, of course, there is this one issue that ought to have given Rudolf some concern: when he set out to "research" Auschwitz, he observed that the walls of the delousing chambers of BW5a and BW5b were covered with blue stains. If, indeed, the gas-tight door of morgue 1 had been installed to allow that room to become a Zyklon B delousing room, why did he not find any blue stains on the remaining walls of that space? Or was it a delousing room that was never used? ''
Jews LARPing as Nazis
Last Edit: 07 Dec 2016 11:25 by Frothy.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust Deniers Triad of Traits 13 Dec 2016 06:44 #288

  • Frothy
  • Frothy's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Released
  • Posts: 17535
  • Likes received: 1811

Change from Inward to Outward Opening Door

In November 1941, the civilian architect Georg Werkmann (working for the SS-WVHA) created a blueprint detailing the basement level of the future crematorium 2. According to his concept, the corpse cellar 1 (the later gas chamber) received a double door opening inward. This opening direction of the door is rather incompatible with a homicidal gas chamber, as the corpses of the gassed victims may block the door making its opening impractical. On 19 December 1942, Dejaco reversed the opening direction of the double door in drawing 2003 (see also here). The outward opening door could now be opened also in the case it was blocked by corpses - a crucial feature for a homicidal gas chamber. Later, the double door was reduced to a single door (see letter of 31 March 1943 in Pressac, Technique, p. 436)
holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/rebuttal-of-mattogno-on-auschwitz-part_15.html
.

Doors can easily be changed.
Jews LARPing as Nazis
Last Edit: 13 Dec 2016 06:47 by Frothy.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust Deniers Triad of Traits 13 Dec 2016 06:48 #289

  • Frothy
  • Frothy's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Released
  • Posts: 17535
  • Likes received: 1811
Piece by piece the holocaust deniers arguments are broken down, what they use is the slippery slope theory, basically the human soap story, the death count at Auschwitz being vastly reduced and a few other issues have been shown to have been wrong and corrected (not by them but by historians themselves) the holocaust deniers within their Triad of Traits brain cage latch onto this and think, ''we'll if the historians we're wrong about those things then perhaps with the whole thing they are wrong'' when in fact it's only historians reviewing and altering their own narrative as more evidence emerged and more accurate conclusions can be reached, in the same way as historians act in other events from the past, but to satisfy their Triad of Traits holocaust deniers latch on to each and every review or alternation as proof that the whole thing did not happen, rather than being satisfied that it's the historians themselves agreeing that they had been wrong about certain elements when new evidence emerges etc...

IE if historians agree what xyz occurred during the battle of Waterloo, that get's taught in schools, but then if they later agree that they had been wrong then the narrative changes to accommodate the results of the new research, but when all the alterations are made, this should not be then used to think ''well if they were wrong about those things, then perhaps they are wrong about the Battle of Waterloo altogether and it did not occur at all'' which would be the logical conclusions of the holocaust deniers mindset.
Jews LARPing as Nazis
Last Edit: 13 Dec 2016 07:44 by Frothy.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust Deniers Triad of Traits 13 Dec 2016 07:16 #290

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 16331
  • Likes received: 6098
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Return of Zorro

The Holocaust Deniers Triad of Traits 13 Dec 2016 07:43 #291

  • Frothy
  • Frothy's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Released
  • Posts: 17535
  • Likes received: 1811
^ There is little to no hope for this one^
Jews LARPing as Nazis
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust Deniers Triad of Traits 13 Dec 2016 08:09 #292

  • hokuspokus
  • hokuspokus's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 1090
  • Likes received: 345
Ausrotten wrote:
Piece by piece the holocaust deniers arguments are broken down, what they use is the slippery slope theory, basically the human soap story, the death count at Auschwitz being vastly reduced and a few other issues have been shown to have been wrong and corrected (not by them but by historians themselves) the holocaust deniers within their Triad of Traits brain cage latch onto this and think, ''we'll if the historians we're wrong about those things then perhaps with the whole thing they are wrong'' when in fact it's only historians reviewing and altering their own narrative as more evidence emerged and more accurate conclusions can be reached, in the same way as historians act in other events from the past, but to satisfy their Triad of Traits holocaust deniers latch on to each and every review or alternation as proof that the whole thing did not happen, rather than being satisfied that it's the historians themselves agreeing that they had been wrong about certain elements when new evidence emerges etc...

IE if historians agree what xyz occurred during the battle of Waterloo, that get's taught in schools, but then if they later agree that they had been wrong then the narrative changes to accommodate the results of the new research, but when all the alterations are made, this should not be then used to think ''well if they were wrong about those things, then perhaps they are wrong about the Battle of Waterloo altogether and it did not occur at all'' which would be the logical conclusions of the holocaust deniers mindset.

And all of the above may or may not be correct if ALL historians shared the same view . But they don't .
So I declare the above flim flam invalid.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust Affirmers Minorah of Lying Traits 30 Oct 2017 15:17 #293

  • Exorcist
  • Exorcist's Avatar
  • Online
  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 1773
  • Likes received: 650
entrangermercenary1 wrote:
Exorcist wrote:
You forgot to mention the Nazi Party was a Jewish Bankster creation. Hitler was a hypochondriac puppet with severe psychotic
mental disorders controlled by the Jewish inner circle of advisors. These included (((Goebels))), (((Himmler))), Honeypot (((Eva Braun))),
Hitler's Jewish Doctors (((Bloch))) and ((( Morrel))) who controlled him via cocain. Hence the lunatic Nazi strategic conduct
of WWII which was indoctrinated into Hitler by his inner circle of Jewish advisors and designed to fail!.

The two World Wars were planned and created by Jewish Zionists by means of their control of the usary banking system.
They controlled both sides.
The excess cremation oven capacity was planned and scripted in advance to back up the "extermination" lie.
There were (((66))) ovens?........what a (((surprise)))..... :larf:

Read the (((Max Nordau))) Speech at a Paris Zionist meeting after the 6th Zionist Congress Conference in Basle (1905)
“‘Now this great progressive world power, England, has after the pogroms of Kishineff, in token of her sympathy with our poor people, offered through the Zionist Congress the autonomous colony of Uganda to the Jewish nation. Of course, Uganda is in Africa, and Africa is not Zion and never will be Zion, to quote Herzl’s own words. But Herzl knows full well that nothing is so valuable to the cause of Zionism as amicable political relations with such a power as England is, and so much more valuable as England’s main interest is concentrated in the Orient. Nowhere else is precedent as powerful as in England, and so it is most important to accept a colony out of the hands of England and create thus a precedent in our favor. Sooner or later the Oriental question will have to be solved, and the Oriental question means, naturally, also the question of Palestine. England, who had addressed a formal, political note to the Zionist Congress—the Zionist Congress which is pledged to the Basle program, England will have the deciding voice in the final solution of the Oriental question, and Herzl has considered it his duty to maintain valuable relations with this great and progressive power. Herzl knows that we stand before a tremendous upheaval of the whole world. Soon, perhaps, some kind of a world-congress will have to be called, and England, the great, free and powerful England, will then continue the work it has begun with its generous offer to the Sixth Congress. And if you ask me now what has Israel to do in Uganda, then let me tell you as the answer the words of the statesmen of Sardinia, only applied to our case and given in our version; let me tell you the following words as if I were showing you the rungs of a ladder leading upward and upward: Herzl, The Zionist Congress, the English Uganda proposition, the future world war, the peace conference where with the help of England a free and Jewish Palestine will be created.’

http://www.jrbooksonline.com/intl_jew_full_version/ij14.htm

@(((Rat)))

Please explain Nordau's pre-knowledge of the coming World Wars and the Balfour Declaration in 1905!!!!..... :iitm:

It says the coming world war which was the 1914-1918 war not world wars. ;)

Start reading half way down Page 42 of Geo. M. Armstong's Book "The Zionists-Roots of Zionism"

https://ia800204.us.archive.org/29/items/TheZionists/52755613-Armstrong-The-Zionists-roots-of-zionism-1950.pdf
The Jewish Encyclopedia also confirms the fact that Wilson was deeply interested in giving Palestine to the Jews. It confirms the claim that he brought about the "Balfour Declaration" and that we entered the war to establish the League of Nations and Palestine as a Jewish home. It was the plan of the Kaiser to acquire Palestine and its mineral wealth for the German Empire. He was informed of the wealth of the Dead Sea and surrounding country for he contemplated building a railroad to Palestine. He was evidently doublecrossed by some one, probably his Prime Minister, Bethmann Hollweg, a Rothschild descendant, for he gave his permission, with his blessing, for Lenin and Trotsky to cross Germany into Russia. He thus obtained the conquest of Russia, one of our allies. This crooked deal obviously meant that we were inveigled into the First World War to establish a Jewish world empire through the League of Nations and to give the Rothschilds the wealth of Palestine. The first war failed to accomplish this purpose and so we had a second one. Franklin Roosevelt truly said that "things don't just happen—they are planned that way." The Zionists now have, according to plan, the wealth of Palestine and
their United Nations, and a $65,000,000 capitol building in New York City that we, the gullible Christian "goyim cattle" have paid for with "sweat and blood and tears."

My bold in the above quote :arowup:
NUKES ARE A HOAX
TRUTH IS HATE FOR THOSE THAT HATE THE TRUTH
Meet the New Boss.....Same as the Old Boss

http://www.stopthecrime.net/Henry-Makow---Illuminati----(2008).PDF
(((ROCCO))) is a Sayanim Troll
(((HotRod))) is a (((ROCCO))) sock account
MrAnderson is a Bollock….lmao
Last Edit: 30 Oct 2017 17:05 by Exorcist.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

The Holocaust Deniers Triad of Traits 27 Aug 2020 07:11 #294

  • Gloria
  • Gloria's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Fresh Member
  • Posts: 429
  • Likes received: 170
in addition to this forum.....

rodoh.info/forum/index.php?sid=63fdc484cd2f4759f63d5f22ea504a58

this would be a good one :cool:

(...not that I am a Holocaust denier...I just question it...meanwhile :P )

:)
"always laugh when you can, it is cheap medicine"
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Flare

The Holocaust Deniers Triad of Traits 27 Aug 2020 09:24 #295

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 16331
  • Likes received: 6098
Gloria wrote:
in addition to this forum.....

rodoh.info/forum/index.php?sid=63fdc484cd2f4759f63d5f22ea504a58

this would be a good one :cool:

(...not that I am a Holocaust denier...I just question it...meanwhile :P )

:)

If one researches well enough, one will get to a point where one sees all the lies, impossibilities and the fact that there is not a shred of forensic evidence for it, thus the Holocaust to be a massive hoax.

It’s not that difficult to get to that realization actually... it just needs a bit of time of thorough research by giving the subject a good look from revisionist perspective.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Related topics

Topic subjectRelevanceDate of latest post
The trolling of the Holocaust Deniers Traid of Traits thread.18.67Wednesday, 23 November 2016
Holocaust Deniers: Why Would They Lie.11.66Monday, 12 October 2015
Where are the holocaust deniers. Show yourselves.11.53Monday, 10 September 2018
Holocaust Investigation Deniers11.53Wednesday, 10 June 2015
More than 2.6m Brits are Holocaust deniers, poll finds11.27Sunday, 27 January 2019
THOUGHT CRIME: Persecution & Raids of Dissidents & Holocaust "Deniers"11.03Wednesday, 07 March 2018
Alien Abduction, 5 traits that could get you abducted..7.68Sunday, 28 July 2013
Chem -trail deniers6.51Tuesday, 05 February 2013
For the White Genocide Deniers6.51Thursday, 13 December 2018
Any Flat earthers here/globe deniers6.43Monday, 22 July 2019
Moderators: novum, rodin, Flare
Powered by Kunena Forum

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it. Secure transactions via paypal.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2020 - May 2021, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 255 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 70 - Raised
( £ 53 GBP )
donation thermometer
21%
Most Recent Donation $50 USD
28th August 2020

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.