Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: Pushing Cannibalism

Pushing Cannibalism 23 Sep 2019 13:41 #1

  • annabelle
  • annabelle's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 2780
  • Likes received: 1824
The Health Benefits of ... Cannibalism

Behavioral scientist Magnus Soderlund suggested that cannibalism was an answer to climate change. It’s another example of mass media rationalizing cannibalism to the masses.

The Stockholm fair recently held a “Gastro Summit” event which discussed the “future of food”. And the future of food sounds terrible. Indeed, the summit featured a seminar led by Stockholm School of Economics professor Magnus Soderlund titled “Can You Imagine Eating Human Flesh?” where cannibalism was promoted to fight climate change, greenhouse emissions, and to encourage sustainability. Some of the topics addressed during the seminar were “Is Cannibalism the solution to food sustainability in the future?” and “Are we humans too selfish to live sustainably?”

On the Swedish television channel TV4, Soderlund stated that climate change will ultimately force people to “try foods they currently wouldn’t think of eating” such as pets, insects, and human flesh. To truly take on the effects of climate change, Soderlund states that we must “awake the idea” of eating human flesh and that it should be discussed as an option in the future.

A screenshot from the TV4 broadcast featuring a disturbing image.

While he believes that cannibalism is the “future of food”, he is aware that work needs to be done to address the “widespread taboo” against cannibalism and the “conservative attitudes” of the masses.

Soderlund believes that people are not cannibals due to “selfishness”. However, as an expert in behavior, he thinks that people can ultimately be “tricked” into “making the right decisions”. According to him, if people were gradually be exposed to cannibalism, the idea could become mainstream.

The scientist nuanced that he was not advocating “all-out cannibalism”, but simply the eating people that are already dead.

Soderlund plans to lecture more on the topic in the future. He is also looking to promote the most bone-chilling term in human history: “Mannisko-kötts branschen”. That means “the human flesh industry”.

The Cannibal Agenda

Yes, as absurd as this might sound, there is a clear and blatant push in mass media to normalize cannibalism to the masses. Using journalists, scientists, the global warming scare and, of course, the entertainment industry, the idea of eating human flesh is rationalized and even glamorized across all platforms owned by the elite. Here are some examples.

@Richard Dawkins
Tissue culture “clean meat” already in 2018? I’ve long been looking forward to this.ind.pn/2F9xAwS
What if human meat is grown? Could we overcome our taboo against cannibalism? An interesting test case for consequentialist morality versus “yuck reaction” absolutism

In the above tweet, UK biologist Richard Dawkins asks if we can overcome our “taboo against cannibalism”. The same question is asked in a recent Newsweek article.

While the article does not fully endorse cannibalism, it opens the door to rationalizing the concept:

“We suspect that we could adapt to human flesh if need be. Many people develop disgust for all kinds of meat, while morticians and surgeons quickly adapt to the initially difficult experience of handling dead bodies. Our ongoing research with butchers in England suggests that they easily adapt to working with animal parts that the average consumer finds quite disgusting.”

The entertainment industry is also being utilized to “plant the seeds” of cannibalism in the consciousness of the masses. For instance, in the Netflix series Chilling Adventures of Sabrina, the concept of cannibalism is playfully added to the story on numerous occasions.

A scene from Chilling Adventures of Sabrina depicting a child is being eaten by the protagonists of the series.

The idea of cannibalism is also at the very core of another Netflix series: Santa Clarita Diet.

Yeah, that’s human blood on their faces.

Pop stars are also used to make cannibalism cool.

In the video Bon Apétit, Katy Perry is treated like a piece of meat. Literally. She is prepared by chefs and is served as the main dish in a restaurant.

The video ends with Perry eating a pie full of human body parts.

An Obsession of the Occult Elite

If you’re asking yourself “why is cannibalism being promoted?”, the true answer to this question is not “to save the environment”. Indeed, the answer to this question is the answer to the question “why are children being sexualized in mass media?”. The answer: To normalize the sick perversions of the occult elite.

This is a picture taken at a Masquerade Ball held by the elite Rothschild family in 1972. The party featured mock corpses on the dinner table (see other pictures of the Rothschild ball here vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/pictures-rothschild-family/).

The menu of the ball included “cadavres exquis” which means “delicious cadavers”.

Recent parties involving the world most powerful and influential people included the same type of “celebration”.

Marina Abramovic (the entertainment elite’s favorite occultist) and Lady Gaga at an event that took place at Watermill Center in 2013. In this picture, they stand before a woman lying in what looks like a pool of blood. Guests scooped that blood with spoons to eat it up.

The event was dubbed “Devil’s Heaven”.

Abramovic held several events that revolved around the idea of cannibalism.

If these people partake in “mock cannibalism” in their public events, God knows what they do behind closed doors.

In 2015, a Politico article titled Inside Hillary’s campaign headquarters showed a rather disturbing painting.

The Clinton campaign headquarters had a painting depicting two men eating another man laying on a table.

In conclusion, the idea of cannibalism is being promoted to the masses using the environment and climate change. However, the true reason behind this mass media push is much darker: It is about normalizing yet another sickness of the occult elite in a constant effort to push the masses into everything that is toxic to the mind, body, and soul.

Last Edit: 24 Sep 2019 00:23 by annabelle.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: rodin, Flare, Gaia

Pushing Cannibalism 24 Sep 2019 07:50 #2

  • Flare
  • Flare's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 17564
  • Likes received: 6335
They're not only pushing cannibalism, they're pushing for eating insects as well.

"Freedom is not a measure of good, but good is the measure of freedom." - Bishop Williamson

Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Pushing Cannibalism 24 Sep 2019 11:54 #3

  • Gloria
  • Gloria's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Junior Member
  • Posts: 582
  • Likes received: 227
sorry about Marina Abramovic...I like her :roll:
Ulay left her on the Chinese Wall while they did an Installation together - and this was the first time she saw him again at "the Artist is present"

We Germans fear God, but nothing else in the World. Otto von Bismarck
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Pushing Cannibalism 24 Sep 2019 16:14 #4

  • annabelle
  • annabelle's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 2780
  • Likes received: 1824
This so-called 'performance art' that the elites are into and are promoting to the masses is another name for black occult witchcraft.


Art has been hijacked by the luciferians and is being used in conjunction with mass media psy-op terrorist programs to subvert/invert everything that is truthful, beautiful and pure!

Marina Abramovic has become the high priestess of the satanic art world.

Her art is subversive and oppressive anti-art!

Her modus operandi incorporates (black) occult symbology and ritual at every opportunity.

She performs psychological techniques and hypnosis to place viewers and participants into a trance-like state. The goal is to perpetuate lies under the guise of illusion. It is all done blatantly in 'plain sight' as required by the rules of 'satanic magick.' The purpose is to deceive while at the same time eliciting consent from the willing participants.

​Marina Abramovic is a Serb of supposed Orthodox religious background and was educated in Belgrade, Serbia. As you can see from the pictures below her parents were communists who served in the military but had a tempestuous marriage devoid of love. She grew up with communist/socialist/marxist ideology permeating her unhappy home environment and influencing her thinking extensively.

I suspect but cannot prove that her parents were Jews masquerading behind christian orthodoxy, concealing who they really were. Historically documented, secular Jews will publicly convert to anything in order to escape persecution or death and conceal their true identity and resume covert activities against society .

In addition to this it is clear from Abramovics' own accounts of childhood that she was emotionally and psychologically 'traumatised' by her 'distant' mother.

This explains a lot about what we see today re: Abramovic's robotic, and persistent obsession with 'self,' and willingness to risk whatever it takes to command respect.

I suspect, that she like many in the culture field is a crypto Jew. Note also that she was influenced by Joseph Beuys' humanistic activism and his blurring of art / life realities which has accelerated ideas spawning 3 generations of 'pseudo art!'

Communism and the 5 pointed red star are synonymous with occult 'Talmudic Judaism' and the 'so called' 5 pointed 'Star of David' which in fact has nothing to do with King David but is in fact the same as the satanic 5 pointed star used in Witchcraft rituals. There is 'no' distinction between them. They are one and the same!! It is imperative for the reader to understand this, otherwise, Abramovic's art doesn't make sense.

Her 'performance' art is meant to obfuscate the 'emptiness' at the heart of it (her emptiness.) The goal is to make it 'appear' profound when in fact it is 'empty' and an insult to intelligence. Her art is totally riddled with hidden (to the uninitiated) 'spiritual' terms, slogans and symbols and presented as 'satanic ritual' to the deluded and unsuspecting. She says she incorporates the 'star' in her work in order to exorcise its power over her life but i believe this is a convenient 'lie.'

Art is being totally denigrated and made filthy and ugly! This self proclaimed witch is not an artist; she is a magician performing occult ceremonies to audiences and getting wealthy while doing it. 'Money for nothing ...'

Abramovic has made herself the subject of her (art) but the office of her practice is one of conjurer, sorceress and illusionist in order to deceive the ignorant masses. This was and is the very same goal of communism which first deceives then controls and finally destroys its victims. All done under the guise of so called, progressive 'art.'

Communism/Judaism/Satanism have always promoted 'man' as 'god' and the end result of this ideology is always terrifying.

Mr and Mrs Abramovic - Red Army

Mrs Abramovic - Communist

Marina - like mother... like daughter

Blood, guts, dismembered body parts, mock corpses, satanic pentagrams and human sacrifice rituals all incorporated into her performances and promoted by Abramovic, her gallerists and PR machine.

If you are having trouble connecting the dots then i can confidently state that you are in serious trouble because your world view 'is' occluded satanically!

This is the debauched state social culture and art have descended to and it is no laughing matter!

Increasing droves of deluded people think this is 'cool,' 'chic' or 'fashionable' maybe even 'high brow' or 'philosophical.' Really? Sorry folks, nothing of value here. Nothing to learn. No lesson to learn here!! Just twisted logic and malevolent intent.

​What you see here is dangerous because history screams at us that the logical conclusion of the acceptance of this social behaviour must be, loss of decency, contempt for innocent human and animal life, lawlessness, anarchy, barbarism, authoritarian control, (totalitarianism) and ultimately when all moral barriers ha been remvoved, genocide and the demise of beauty in legitimate culture and art.

Abramovic is leading the pagan charge using art as a means of propaganda to subvert and destroy that which is wholesome, pure and morally right.

This art isn't just harmless promotion of the occult or neo pagan ideology and practice, it is attempting to undermine and eradicate what it views as harmful and obsolete. Many satanists have stated this goal openly and it is in the public record.

Look at the images below and view the subtle inversion/subversion of Christian symbology. This is not accidental but deliberate! Abramovic is personally culpable and knows exactly what she is doing!

Scarlet whore in mock 'Pieta'

Witch Christ and - black lamb inversion

Mock crucifixion as witch Judas/Baphomet figure

You might say, "i don't see it" but that would be disingenuous! The historical 'pieta' from the renaissance turns into blasphemy where Abramovic's Mary becomes a scarlet whore. Then Abramovic mocks Jesus Christ carrying the 'black' goat or sheep on her shoulders twisting the notion of 'purity' and 'innocence' of the lamb. Finally a bare breasted female 'Judas' (yellow denotes betrayal) figure hanging in mock 'crucifixion' pose holding 2 snakes (symbolic of the Minoan Snake Goddess of Fertility) is depicted ridiculing and usurping the source of 'new life' offered through Christ's death on the cross and his subsequent resurrection from the dead.

The aim is to 'mix' or 'dilute' religious ideas and symbols into a deceptive, 'pantheistic' neo pagan fusion that will result finally in the institution of a 'false' new 'world' religion.

On Twitter she has stated openly that an occult magick ritual performance in the museum/gallery is art but done in private it isn't art.

Really? Please tell me what changed between public space and private space? The effect is exactly the same!

​If you can't see the deception and also the mockery in public of what is historically 'sacred' then maybe you have been desensitized and need to re-think what you are seeing and accepting as 'art.'

Abramovic isn't content to settle for occult promotion, she wants to insult and blaspheme against what she hates.

This 'art' is a clear example of how cultural marxism is being used against Western culture in order to denigrate it and then destroy it.

It is clear to me that Abramovic is an agent of destruction like many others in the culture field to infiltrate art, then pollute it, falsify it and finally destroy it, right in front of our eyes!

Let me remind you of the following statement made by Alice Bailey, maybe, the most influential witch of the 20th century!

Alice Bailey stated in her 10 point charter for social subversion taken from 'The Externalisation of The Hierarchy' written in 1934 and published in 1957 and now integrated into the UN mission:

"Debase Art and Make it Run Mad: Promote new forms of art which will corrupt and defile the imagination of people because art is the language of the spirit, that which is inside, you can bring out in painting, music, drama etc.​"

​Reader, do not be deceived, art has been debased and inverted and has been made to run 'mad' just as Bailey's mandate ordered 82 years ago!!

Marina Abramovic has obeyed Bailey's edict to the letter and dragged art down to yet another level of corruption!

Last Edit: 24 Sep 2019 16:24 by annabelle.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: rodin

Pushing Cannibalism 25 Sep 2019 03:54 #5

  • Frothy
  • Frothy's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Released
  • Posts: 17872
  • Likes received: 1854
So what's all that shit that Christians do when they symbolise eating flesh and drinking blood?

I really don't get it.....it's quite a pagan like unsavoury routine.
Jews LARPing as Nazis
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Pushing Cannibalism 25 Sep 2019 10:01 #6

  • annabelle
  • annabelle's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 2780
  • Likes received: 1824
The Eucharist

The word "Eucharist" is a Greek word that means "thanksgiving." In the gospel accounts of the Last Supper, Jesus is described as "giving thanks" before breaking the bread (Luke 22:19), and so this word became a proper name for the Lord's Supper in the early Catholic Church. Today, it is more commonly associated with the elements in communion, especially the host or "wafer," although the ceremony itself is still called "The Holy Eucharist."

Now, you might be wondering why I'm taking so much time and effort to explain something as harmless as the ceremony known around the world as communion. If you've probably taken part in a communion service. So why make all this fuss about bread and wine? Why? Because that's where the similarity between evangelical communion services and the Roman Catholic Mass ends - at the bread and the wine!


That 18-letter word above is a complete theological statement . . . and the name of a doctrine, out of which springs the most astounding set of beliefs and practices.

Very, very few people know what the Catholic Church actually believes and teaches concerning this subject, and I am convinced that even fewer Catholics realize themselves what they are taking part in. From earliest childhood, "This is the body of Christ" is all they've ever heard when the priest gingerly placed the wafer on their tongue. And as they grew up, it was such a natural and normal part of religious life, that their minds never even questioned the fact that Jesus Christ, Himself, was actually in their mouth!

It might be hard for you to believe, but that's exactly, literally, what "transubstantiation" means. The Roman Catholic Church teaches their flocks that the bread and the wine used in the Mass actually, physically, turn into the flesh and blood of Jesus Christ after the priest blesses them during the liturgy (ceremony). Although this in itself might shock you, it is really only the beginning. For the implications and practical conclusions of this doctrine are absolutely mind-boggling.

Exclusive Authority

For example, the Roman Catholic Church teaches that since their priests are the only ones who have the authority from God (2) to pronounce the blessing which changes the elements of communion into the actual body and blood of Jesus, that they are the only church where Jesus "physically resides" even now! Let me quote a letter written to one of the girls in our ministry from a devoted Catholic:

"To explain the Catholic Church would take volumes, but basically the Catholic Church was founded by Jesus Christ when He was here on earth. It is the ONLY church founded by Jesus. The greatest asset of our church is that we have Jesus present in the Holy Eucharist - He is really here, body, soul and divinity. He is God and in His omnipotence can do anything He wishes, and He decided to remain with us until the end of the world in the form of the host in Holy Communion."

If you think this is just the isolated opinion of someone on the fringe of the church, or that the Catholic Church as a whole does not really believe or teach this, I beg you to read on. For not only is this the official teaching of Rome, but according to irreversible church decree (called dogma), anyone who does not hold to this belief, in the most explicit detail, is accursed and damned forever!

The Council of Trent

When Europe was electrified by the eloquent preaching of the sixteenth century reformation, the Roman Catholic hierarchy gathered together her theologians who worked for three decades on the preparation of a statement of faith concerning the doctrine of transubstantiation. This document remains, to this day, the standard of Catholic doctrine.

As the Second Vatican Council commenced in 1963, Pope John XXIII declared, "I do accept entirely all that has been decided and declared at the Council of Trent." What did the Council of Trent decide and declare? Some of the first sections are as follows:

CANON I - "If anyone shall deny that the body and blood, together with the soul and divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ, and therefore entire Christ, are truly, really, and substantially contained in the sacrament of the most Holy Eucharist; and shall say that He is only in it as a sign, or in a figure - let him be accursed!"

CANON II - "If anyone shall say that the substance of the bread and wine remains in the sacrament of the most Holy Eucharist, together with the body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ - let him be accursed!"

CANON VI - "If anyone shall say that Christ, the only begotten Son of God, is not to be adored in the holy sacrament of the Eucharist, even with the open worship of Latria, and therefore not to be venerated with any peculiar festal celebrity, not to be solemnly carried about in processions according to the praiseworthy and universal rites and customs of the Holy Church, and that He is not to be publicly set before the people to be adored, and that His adorers are idolators, - let him be accursed!"

The Worship Of The Host

"God is spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth." (John 4:23)

In Canon VI, a rite of worship called "Latria" was spoken of. This is not just an "ancient custom," it is thoroughly practiced today in many Masses. After the bread has been supposedly "changed" into the Christ by the priest, it is placed in a holder called a monstrance. And before this monstrance the Catholic must bow and worship (this act is called genuflecting) the little wafer as God! Sometimes they have processions where they solemnly march, as the congregation bows and offers praise and worship - to this piece of bread!

The Roman teaching that Jesus Christ is physically present in each morsel of bread creates many other doctrinal and practical problems. For instance, when the service is over, what happens to all those leftover wafers that have been "changed into Christ?" Do they change back into bread again when the priest goes home? I'm afraid not.

For according to Canon IV of the Council of Trent, they stay flesh! And don't think that 400 year-old decree is just some dusty old manuscript in a museum case somewhere - it still is completely adhered to and passionately practiced. As an example, here is a passage from an official Catholic home instruction book, copyrighted 1978:

"Jesus Christ does not cease to exist under the appearances of bread and wine after the Mass is over. Furthermore, some hosts are usually kept in all Catholic churches. In these hosts, Jesus is physically and truly present, as long as the appearances of bread remain. Catholics therefore have the praiseworthy practice of `making visits' to our Lord present in their churches to offer Him their thanks, their adoration, to ask for help and forgiveness: in a word, to make Him the center around which they live their daily lives."

That is an incredible interpretation of how to make Jesus the center of your daily life!

When Did This Teaching Begin?

The teaching of transubstantiation does not date back to the Last Supper as most Catholics suppose.

It was a controversial topic for many centuries before officially becoming an article of faith (which means that it is essential to salvation according to Rome). The idea of a physical presence was vaguely held by some, such as Ambrose, but it was not until 831 A.D. that Paschasius Radbertus, a Benedictine Monk, published a treatise openly advocating the doctrine.

Even then, for almost another four centuries, theological war was waged over this teaching by bishops and people alike, until at the Fourth Lateran Council in 1215 A.D., it was officially defined and canonized as a dogma (a teaching or doctrine that can never be reversed or repealed. It is equal in authority to the Bible.) by Pope Innocent III.

Church historians tell us that when this doctrine first began to be taught, the priests took great care that no crumb should fall - lest the body of Jesus be hurt, or even eaten by a mouse or a dog! There were quite serious discussions as to what should be done if a person were to vomit after receiving the sacrament.

How Rome Views the Bible

Before we proceed to look at what the Bible has to say on this subject, it is important to understand the official Catholic view of the Scriptures. According to unquestionable decree, they hold that "Church tradition has equal authority with the Bible." This is not just a theological view, but it was made an article of faith by the same Council of Trent in 1546! And again, this view is completely held by the Church today:

"The teachings of the Church will always be in keeping with the teachings of the Scripture...and it is through the teaching of the Church that we understand more fully truths of sacred Scripture. To the Catholic Church belongs the final word in the understanding and meaning of the Holy Spirit in the words of the Bible."

And explaining the premise used in interpreting the Bible:" "...usually, the meaning of the Scriptures is sought out by those who are specially trained for this purpose. And in their conclusions, they know that no explanation of the Scriptures which contradicts the truths constantly taught by the infallible Church can be true." (10)

Anyone can see how such a mode of interpretation can be dangerously used to manipulate Scripture to mean absolutely anything at all! Who has not observed this of the various cults? The Moonies, Mormons, and Jehovah's Witnesses all back up their false teachings with "new revelations" and "inspired interpretations" of the Scriptures - each claiming that the Holy Spirit revealed these new truths to their founders. One opens themselves to all kinds of deception when they judge the Bible by what their church or pastor teaches, instead of judging what their church or pastor teaches by the Bible!

Catholic Proof-Texts Explained

With this in mind, we will briefly discuss the two main passages of Scripture that the Roman Church uses while trying to show that Jesus Himself taught transubstantiation.

John 6:54-55: "He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life; and I will raise him up on the last day. For My flesh is true food, and My blood is true drink."

Catholics are taught here, that Jesus is explaining how He is literally offering them His flesh and blood, so that they may have eternal life by physically eating Him. With just a little study of the whole passage (verses 27-71), it is clear that Jesus was not talking about physical, but spiritual food and drink.

Food is eaten to satisfy hunger. And in verse 35 Jesus says, "He who cometh to Me shall never hunger." Now, Jesus is not promising eternal relief from physical hunger pains. He is, of course, speaking of the spiritual hunger in man for righteousness and salvation, And He promises to those who will "come to Him" that He will satisfy their hunger for these things forever - therefore, to come to Him is to "eat"! (See also Matt. 5:6, 11:28; Jn. 4:31-34.)

We drink also to satisfy thirst, and again in verse 35 Jesus tells us, "He that believeth on Me shall never thirst." Therefore, to believe on Him is to "drink"! (See also John 4:13-14.) No one can say that Jesus was here establishing the eating and drinking of His literal flesh and blood to give eternal life, for in verse 63 He says, "It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh profits nothing; the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life." Thus Jesus makes clear what we should be eating and drinking to have eternal life! Matt. 26:26 and 28: "This is My body...this is My blood." (See also Matt. 4:4.)

Catholics base their whole religious system on their interpretation of these two verses. They adamantly teach that right here, Jesus is pronouncing the first priestly blessing that mysteriously changes the bread and wine into His body and blood.

The absolute folly of such a conclusion is proved by this one observation: He was literally still there before, during, and after they had partaken of the bread and the cup! He was not changed into some liquid and bread - His flesh was still on His bones, and His blood still in His veins. He had not vanished away to reappear in the form of a piece of bread or a cup of wine!

Let's look closer at His words. No one can deny that here we have figurative language. Jesus did not say TOUTO GIGNETAI ("this has become" or "is turned into"), but TOUTO ESTI ("this is," i.e., "signifies," "represents" or "stands for"). (11) It is obvious that Jesus' meaning was not literal but symbolic!

Throughout the gospels we find similar metaphorical language: Jesus referring to Himself as "the Door," "the Vine," "the Light," "the Root," "the Rock," "the Bright and Morning Star," as well as "the Bread." The passage is written with such common language that it is plain to any observant reader that the Lord's Supper was intended primarily as a memorial and in no sense a literal sacrifice. "Do this in remembrance of Me." (Luke 22:19)

True Pagan Origins

Where did this teaching and practice really come from? Like many of the beliefs and rites of Romanism, transubstantiation was first practiced by pagan religions.

The noted historian Durant said that belief in transubstantiation as practiced by the priests of the Roman Catholic system is "one of the oldest ceremonies of primitive religion." (12) The syncretism and mysticism of the Middle East were great factors in influencing the West, particularly Italy. (13) In Egypt, priests would consecrate mest cakes which were supposed to become the flesh of Osiris. (14) The idea of transubstantiation was also characteristic of the religion of Mithra whose sacraments of cakes and haoma drink closely parallel Catholic Eucharist rites. (15)

The idea of eating the flesh of deity was most popular among the people of Mexico and Central America long before they ever heard of Christ; and when Spanish missionaries first landed in those countries, "their surprise was heightened, when they witnessed a religious rite which reminded them of communion...an image made of flour...and after consecration by priests, was distributed among the people who ate it...declaring it was the flesh of deity..." (16)

So Why Do They Teach It?

Before concluding our first chronicle, the question needs to be asked, "Why does the Roman Catholic Church need to have such a doctrine - why do they think that Jesus wants them to physically eat Him?"

That is what truly puzzled me as I read astounded through the catechism and doctrinal instruction books. But the answer to that question is a sad one. As I said before, the implications and practical conclusions of the teaching of transubstantiation are substantially worse than the doctrine itself - and like a great web spun by an industrious spider, Rome's teachings spiral out from this central hub like the spokes of a wheel.

In Catholic Chronicle II we will look intently at the next direct result of transubstantiation in official Catholic systematic theology: "The Sacrifice of the Mass."

Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Pushing Cannibalism 25 Sep 2019 10:30 #7

  • annabelle
  • annabelle's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 2780
  • Likes received: 1824
The Sacrifice of the Mass - What Does it Mean?

In Chronicle I, we thoroughly examined the doctrine of transubstantiation - its history, practice, and real meaning. But we have waited for this second article to answer the question: WHY? Why must there be present in the Mass the literal body and blood of Jesus? What purpose does it serve?

The answer is found in the startling words: "The sacrifice of the Mass is the same sacrifice of the cross, for there is the same priest, the same victim, and the same offering." (1)

And in the words of Pope Pius IV....

"I profess likewise that in the Mass there is offered to God a true, proper, and propitiatory (2) sacrifice for the living and the dead." (From the fifth article of the creed of Pope Pius IV.)

That is the incredible truth! The Roman Catholic Church believes and teaches that in every Mass, in every church, throughout the world (estimated at up to 200,000 Masses a day) that Jesus Christ is being offered up again, physically, as a sacrifice for sin (benefiting not only those alive, but the dead (3) as well!)

Every Roman Mass is a re-creation of Jesus' death for the sins of the world. NOT A SYMBOLIC RE-CREATION - but a literal, actual offering of the flesh and blood of the Lord to make daily atonement for all the sins that have been daily committed since Jesus was crucified almost 2,000 years ago. (4)

That's why the bread and wine must become physically Jesus' body and blood, so that they can be once again offered for sin: "The Holy Eucharist is the perpetual continuation of this act of sacrifice and surrender of our Lord. When the Lord's Supper is celebrated, Christ again presents Himself in His act of total surrender to the Father in death." (5)

"He offers Himself continually to the Father, in the same eternal act of offering that began on the cross and will NEVER CEASE." (6)

"The Mass is identical to Calvary - it is a sacrifice for sin - it must be perpetuated to take away sin." (7)

The catechism of the Council of Trent required all pastors to explain that not only did the elements of the Mass contain flesh, bones and nerves as a part of Christ, "But also a WHOLE CHRIST." (8) Thus it is referred to as "the sacrifice of the Mass" and as "a RENEWAL of the sacrifice of the cross." (9)

The Council Of Trent On "The Sacrifice Of The Mass"

As we shared in Chronicle I, the Council of Trent was called to clarify and standardize Catholic doctrine in response to the challenges of the Reformation. The canons on this subject (passed in Session XXII. Cap II.) are as follows:

1. "If anyone shall say, that in the Mass there is not offered to God a true and proper sacrifice, or that what is offered is nothing else than Christ given to be eaten, let him be anathema." (10)

2. "If anyone shall say that in these words, 'This do in remembrance of Me,' Christ did not make the apostles priests, or did not ordain that they themselves and other priests should offer His body and blood, let him be anathema."

3. "If anyone shall say that the sacrifice of the Mass is only of praise and thanksgiving, or a bare commemoration of the sacrifice performed on the cross, but not propitiatory; or that it is of benefit only to the person who takes it, and ought not to be offered for the living and the dead fro sins, punishments, satisfactions, and other necessities, let him be accursed."

4. "If anyone shall say that a blasphemy is ascribed to the most holy sacrifice of Christ performed on the cross by the sacrifice of the Mass - let him be accursed."

But Is This The Belief Of Rome Today?

If any be in doubt as to the modern Roman position, we shall quote the recent (1963-1965) Second Vatican Council:

"At the Last Supper...our Saviour instituted the Eucharistic sacrifice of His body and blood. He did this in order to perpetuate the sacrifice of the cross..." p. 154, THE DOCUMENTS OF VATICAN II, Walter M. Abbott, S.J.

The catechism books teach that the reason the Mass is the same sacrifice as that of Calvary is because the victim in each case was Jesus Christ. (11) In fact, they refer to the bread of the Eucharist as the "host," which is the Latin word HOSTIA which literally means "VICTIM." (12)

But Why "The Sacrifice" Of The Mass?

We will now quote the church's own contemporary literature to fully answer this question (taken from the book, THIS IS THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, published by the Catholic Information Service, Knights of Columbus, Imprimatur: (13) Most Reverend John F. Whealon, Archbishop of Hartford:

"Sacrifice is the very essence of religion. And it is only through sacrifice that union with the Creator can be perfectly acquired. It was through sacrifice that Christ Himself was able to achieve this for man. IT IS ONLY THROUGH THE PERPETUATION OF THAT SACRIFICE THAT THIS UNION MAY BE MAINTAINED.

"What makes the Mass the most exalted of all sacrifices is the nature of the victim, Christ Himself. For the Mass is the continuation of Christ's sacrifice which He offered through His life and Christ was not only the priest of this sacrifice (of the Cross), He was also the victim, the very object itself of this sacrifice.

The Mass is thus the same as the sacrifice of the cross. No matter how many times it is offered, nor in how many places at one time, it is the same sacrifice of Christ. Christ is forever offering Himself in the Mass." (14)

But Jesus Said "It Is Finished!"

Every true believer loves the sound of these words: "It is finished!" (John 19:30). For it is the wonderful exclamation that the Lord's suffering was finally over - He had fulfilled His mission!

Jesus had lived a Life of Sorrow, bearing the burden of a world gone mad. He had been rejected by everyone, even His closest friends. He had lived a perfect life before men and God, and His reward on earth was to be laughed at, spat upon, beaten beyond recognition, and finally nailed to a cross.

But He had submitted willingly, because it was the will of His Father to offer Him as the satisfaction of the penalty for all the sin in the world - past, present and future!

But here, in the words of a Roman Catholic priest, is the "true meaning" of the words "it is finished!" "These words do not declare that His sacrifice was finished, but that He had finished His former, normal, earthly life and was now fixed in the state of a victim...He then began His everlasting career as the perpetual sacrifice of the new law." (15) Hence, according to Rome, Jesus must be forever "perpetually"dying for sin.

Have you ever wondered why in every Catholic Church they still have Jesus up on the cross? Every crucifix with Jesus portrayed as nailed to it, tells the whole Catholic story - Jesus is still dying for the sins of the world! But that's a lie! We need only look to the Scriptures to see the truth.

Back To The Book

The epistle to the Hebrews speaks of the "once for all" sacrifice of Christ on the cross, not a daily sacrifice on altars. The Bible repeatedly affirms in the clearest and most positive terms that Christ's sacrifice on Calvary was complete in that one offering. And that it was never to be repeated is set forth explicitly in Hebrews, chapters 7, 9 and 10:

"Who needeth not daily, as those high priests, to offer up sacrifice, first for his own sins, and then for the people's: For this He did once, when He offered up Himself" (7:27). "...by His own blood He entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us" (9:12). "Nor yet that He should offer Himself often..but now once in the end of the world hath He appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of Himself..so Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for Him shall He appear the second time without sin unto salvation" (9:25-28). "...we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all. And every priest standeth daily ministering and offering oftentimes the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins; but this man, after He had offered one sacrifice for the sins forever, sat down on the right hand of God...for by one offering He hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified" (10:10-14).

Notice that throughout these verses occurs the statement "once for all" which shows how perfect, complete and final Jesus' sacrifice was! His work on the cross constituted one historic event which need never be repeated and which in fact cannot be repeated. As Paul say, "Christ, being raised from the dead dieth no more" (Romans 6:9). Any pretense of a continuous offering for sin is worse than vain, it is blasphemy and true fulfillment of the Scripture, "Seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put Him to an open shame." (Heb. 6:6).

Jesus - The Only Priest

"There is one mediator between God and men, the man Jesus Christ" (ITim.2:5).

But Roman Catholicism teaches that the apostles were ordained by Jesus Himself (at the Last Supper) to perpetuate the coming sacrifice He would make on the cross. And that this ordination has been handed down through the centuries to the current generation of priests. Therefore, Rome teaches that her priests actually operate and discharge the priesthood of Jesus Christ, and that they are called "other Christs" (alter Christus). (16)

This explains the great adulation and honor heaped upon the Roman priest. The French Catholic Saint J.M.B. Vianney said that "Where there is no priest there is no sacrifice, and where there is no sacrifice there is no religion...without the priest the death and passion of our Lord would be of no avail to us... see the power of the priest! By one word from his lips, he changes a piece of bread into a God! A greater feat than the creation of a world."

He also said, "If I were to meet a priest and an angel, I would salute the priest before saluting the angel. The angel is a friend of God, but the priest holds the place of God...next to God Himself, the priest is everything!" What humiliation for Jesus Christ, the One who has been given a name "above all other names!"

But Isn't Rome Changing?

For Rome could never reject the sacrifice of the Mass - just streamline it enough to keep the truth of its meaning hidden. Pope John XXIII made it clear that His Church is bound "to all the teachings of the Church in its entirety and preciseness, as it still shines forth in the act of the Council of Trent and First Vatican Council..." (18)

It is clear that the whole of Roman teaching and belief is founded on this premise of the continual sacrifice of Christ for sin: Again, Catholic writings declare:

"It should be easy to see why the Mass holds such an important place in the Church's life. The Mass is the very essence of the Church. Within it the Church's life, and the Church's very existence is centered. If there were no Mass, there could be no Catholic Church. The Mass is our act of worship, an act which we know to be really worthy of God, because it is the sacrifice of God's own Son.

"What the sacrifices of the old law were unable to accomplish - the Mass performs: Perfect atonement is made for sin.

"The souls of men yet unborn, together with those now living and those who have come into existence since Christ's sacrifice, all have need of the salvation which Christ has won for us. It is through the Mass as well as through the other sacraments that the effects of Christ's salvation are applied to the souls of men." (19)

It is made thoroughly clear that Rome will forever put its faith in the Mass for the eternal forgiveness of sins. To remove this belief from her system of theology, would be like knocking our the pillars of a great edifice - the whole building would come tumbling down!

Paul's Extreme Warning

As I sat stunned, reading all the "Let them be accursed" threats of the Council of Trent, I could not help but think how their curses would only fall back on their own heads - for the words of our brother Paul calls out across the centuries:

"But even though we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you a gospel contrary to that which we have preached to you, let him be accursed!" (Gal. 1:8).

Not only does Paul warn that an authentic angel from heaven should not be heeded while preaching "different doctrine," but he gives the ultimate warning -"...even though we!" Paul strictly warned the Galatians, not even to listen to him - the chief apostle - if he should reverse himself on any of the fundamental teachings of the gospel. How much more then, should we reject the appalling traditions and practices of a system that is not only unbiblical, but is actually steeped in mysticism, bordering dangerously on the occult!


That doctrine which maintains a change of the substance of bread and wine, into the substance of Christ's body and blood (commonly called transubstantiation) by consecration of a priest, or by any other way, is repugnant, not to Scripture alone, but even to common sense, and reason; overthroweth the nature of the sacrament, and hath been, and is, the cause of manifold superstitions; yea, of gross idolatries. [132]

Last Edit: 25 Sep 2019 10:41 by annabelle.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Pushing Cannibalism 27 Sep 2019 08:29 #8

  • annabelle
  • annabelle's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 2780
  • Likes received: 1824
Should You Eat Your Placenta?

Eating placenta after birth 'borders on cannibalism', says top gynaecologist. It's a stomach-churning trend which is justified by its purported health benefits. But a leading gynaecologist says that eating placenta provides no obvious health boost – and the practice borders on cannibalism.

The act of consuming placenta after birth has been popularised by celebrities.

The placenta, which is also known as afterbirth, connects the foetus to the uterine wall and is the barrier through which nutrients and waste pass via the mother’s blood supply.

Some believe that its nutrition levels can help boost the mood and milk production of new mothers.

But gynaecologist Alex Farr, from the Medical University of Vienne, said: “Medically speaking, the placenta is a waste product.

“After the placenta is genetically part of the newborn, eating the placenta borders on cannibalism.”

Dr Farr added that “presumed nutrients” like iron, selenium and zinc are not present in particularly high concentrations.

Worryingly, concentrations of heavy metals have been found to accumulate in the placenta during pregnancy.

Dr Farr’s comments were made as part of a study into the rise of placenta consumption – known as placentophagy - published in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

The placenta is typically consumed by processing it into capsules – but some have been known to actually cook it and eat it.

Earlier this year the US Department of Health raised the alarm after a mother who’d eaten placenta capsules suffered life-threatening blood poisoning.

The bacteria – part of the streptococcus group – was likely transmitted via breastfeeding from the placenta capsules.


Eating Fresh Placenta
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Pushing Cannibalism 27 Sep 2019 09:01 #9

  • Lux Interior
  • Lux Interior's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Do you know de way?
  • Posts: 4572
  • Likes received: 1332
I'm no nutritionist but I doubt it offers much more than standard sources of meat protein.
Let the vacuous ones promote it and let their shit head followers copy it.
liberabo te ab inferno

875 020 079

He cried in a whisper at some image, at some vision—he cried out twice, a cry that was no more than a breath: "'The horror!
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
Moderators: novum, rodin, Flare
Powered by Kunena Forum

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2020 - May 2021, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 250 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 192 - Raised
( £ 140 GBP )
donation thermometer
Most Recent Donation $122 USD
4th January 2021
Bitcoin Address: bc1q0kazqya0nurfxtunxv807vm0m8852nnrrk8mj8
Ethereum Address: 0xe69915c80dd75df19f438d556267e04f932f057d
More Info: Donation options for TZ

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.