Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2

TOPIC: Vaccine myths unraveling: 600 percent increase in number of parents refusing vaccinations for their children (Australia)

Vaccine myths unraveling: 600 percent increase in number of parents refusing vaccinations for their children (Australia) 19 Feb 2015 02:31 #21

  • wiikkidd
  • wiikkidd's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Gold Member
  • Posts: 5884
  • Likes received: 997
r. Russell Blaylock, 69, is a retired American neurosurgeon.

Ken Anton summarizes this informative video
by Blaylock which argues that vaccines cause
disease. Is the medical cartel seeding
the sickness upon which its profits depend?





"For example: the Live Polio Vaccine given to 90 million Americans in the 50's & 60's, accidentally included the SV40 carcinogenic virus from monkey kidneys. After its discovery the government tried to keep it secret. Recent studies show the SV40 is causing malignant tumors in thousands of human lungs, brains and lymph systems."


by Ken Anton
"Be Prepared to Make Your Own Health Decisions"
(abridged by henrymakow.com)

As an experienced Neurosurgeon, Dr. Russell Blaylock explains how Immuno-Excitotoxicity can cause autism & associated diseases. Excessive vaccines given to babies up to 24-months-old can lead to inflammation of the brain w/symptoms such as rashes, screaming, memory loss, angry outbursts, depression, seizures, ADHD and other neurological disorders.

There has been a radical increase in Autism over the past 30 years:

1980's- 1 in 10,000 cases
2014- 1 in 50 cases

During the same period, vaccinations increased from 10 (for children up to 6 years) to now 40 vaccinations for babies up to 24 months.

This excessive rate of vaccination can cause over-stimulation of the brain's immune system, the Microglia which triggers release of excitotoxins that attack the neural pathways in the baby's undeveloped brain. This can lead to autism or related disorders.

Pediatricians today arrogantly push vaccines on parents with newborns without discussion of serious adverse effects. Recent scientific evidence shows 1% of vaccinated children have some form of neurological damage, signifying a tragedy for the whole family.

Warning: The Flu vaccine given in pregnancy can affect the baby's brain and lead to autism or schizophrenia years later. Also soon after birth, babies are given the Hepatitis B shot, totally unnecessary yet extremely toxic which can cause a critical immune response, then possibly autism or even SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome).

The toxins in vaccines include mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, bacteria, MSG and viral contaminants undetected by vaccine suppliers. Live virus vaccines like the MMR are especially risky. By suppressing the immune system, babies are vulnerable to other diseases. Even though attenuated, such live viruses can persist for years and later cause asthma, diabetes or brain disorders.

Vaccines often cause the disease they are designed to prevent. After the 1970's, every new case of polio was caused by the Live Polio Vaccine itself.

Many studies on thimerosal (ethyl mercury) have shown its toxicity to the brain. Even very small doses can cause chronic inflammation, yet doses given to babies are 80 times greater than limits set for adults. For 70 years, not one scientific safety study of thimerosal has been undertaken, yet they claim by phony epidemiological studies it is safe to use in vaccines.

Dr Blaylock says he caught diseases like mumps, measles, rubella, chicken pox and the flu when he was young, with no serious side effects and yet benefited from lifetime immunity. His community held measles parties where neighbors brought their kids to be exposed to measles and get it over with. Contrast that to the ruckus over a recent measles 'epidemic' at Disneyland where some 87 children caught measles. Since it's a mild disease for children, this is an example of media hype and scare tactics to boost vaccination and industry profits. Yet the irony is that it's the vaccinated kids with limited immunity who commonly infect others.

Each vaccine has its own risk factors and Dr Blaylock goes into some detail explaining these. For example, the HepB and combo vaccines like MMR and DTP cause the most adverse reactions in babies.

The Flu vaccine contains thimerosal, toxic to the brain. Yet for babies under 24 months, the vaccine is totally ineffective. The makers anticipate each year which flu strain (out of over 300) will be the most likely one and even then it is seldom effective. 70% of doctors & nurses refuse to take it. Although the CDC exaggerates the number of flu related deaths each year, a 35 year study shows no reduction in the overall death rate by taking the flu vaccine. So why take the risk especially for babies?

To understand vaccine risks better, Dr Blaylock recommends Neil Millers's "Vaccine Safety Manual". Also see the NVIC Disease & Vaccines database

According to a recent AP press release "A measles outbreak that originated at Disneyland has grown to 87 cases". Apparently it is spreading slowly around the country and the media is blowing it up as if a major epidemic is at hand. This is sheer nonsense, especially as the older generation is well aware that measles is a mild childhood disease. Yet the media scare campaign helps promote mandatory vaccinations, thus increasing Big Pharma profits.

A related article from VaccineImpact.com reports "Zero US Measles Deaths in 10 Years, but Over 100 Measles Vaccine Deaths". Clearly, it is the vaccinated who are taking the greater risk.

Measles is now a hot topic across the nation, promoted by the media and Medical Cartel, calling for mandatory vaccinations while pitting pro-vaccers against anti-vaccers. This is typical 'divide and conquer' strategy carried out by the Ruling Elite in all matters from politics to wars to medicine, in which they are deeply involved.

CONCLUSION

"It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine." --Marcia Angell, MD ("Drug Companies and Doctors: A story of Corruption." NY Review of Books, Jan. 15, 2009.)

"Vaccines have to be considered the bargain basement technology for the 20th Century." Dr Maurice Hilleman, Leading Vaccine Developer

---


Be Prepared to Make Your Own Health Decisions

*Assert your rights: oppose mandatory vaccinations
*Don't submit your baby to multiple vaccinations causing autism
*Study every vaccine and their risks before agreeing to any of them
*The yearly flu shot is rarely effective, yet can cause harm
*Resist contrived social pressure to vaccinate; make it your choice.
*Cancer is not a death sentence: Evaluate natural therapies that actually cure cancer before submitting to the 'cancer vortex'
*Prioritize nutrition, eat natural organic food to maintain health
*Avoid excessive glucose, MSG, aspartame and processed foods
*Exercise regularly: good for heart, immune and lymph systems
*Join the new wave of health conscious Americans

--
Related- Government Caught Lying about Vaccines

First Comment from Diane:

For the last year, I have been nursing my son's neurological injury from a flu vaccine. He had deep seizures for an entire day. Even leading doctors in our top-rated children's hospital could not stop them. He was even intubated. He had to learn how to walk again. He is doing extremely well now, All Thanks Be To God, luckily I could stay home with him.

There are 10 children I personally know of, from doing news searches, that either died or were permanently injured from last year's flu shot. I have talked to some of the news reporters in little towns as well as to other moms. Not to mention the countless others who likely were affected and the medical community does not acknowledge it could be the vaccine.

The physicians refused to do the reporting on the vaccine, saying the CDC would make their lives hell with all the paperwork. Readers, please, don't ever let this happen to your child. Please consider all sides of the story before you immunize--I have worked in the health care field for 15 years--doctors are only following what they are told to be true about "Best Practices" - they are not getting all of the information.

PS- Thanks, I have been shunned by so many colleagues after this happened. The other mothers were shunned as well. So we all need to get the word out. My aunt has been a pediatric nurse for 30 years, she agrees with me, the CDC covers for the illnesses medications and vaccines cause by creating impossible reporting systems.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Vaccine myths unraveling: 600 percent increase in number of parents refusing vaccinations for their children (Australia) 19 Feb 2015 08:12 #22

  • wolfy
  • wolfy's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 2938
  • Likes received: 976
I am utterly convinced that "vaccines" will become the biggest scandal ever in the medical industry.

I am 100% sure that the proof that vaccines have caused the massive rise in Allergies, Asthma, Autism, ADHD will become apparent in the not too distant future and I am also sure that the children born since middle 2000, when the massive multiple schedule really started, face problems in their later years, both physically and mentally.
It was always going to happen!!
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: wiikkidd

Vaccine myths unraveling: 600 percent increase in number of parents refusing vaccinations for their children (Australia) 21 Feb 2015 07:49 #23

  • zax
  • zax's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Gold Member
  • Posts: 5812
  • Likes received: 1560
Many ailmets in elderly people stem from all the shots given to them in childhood.Even artriitis.
I've shown case studies to friends that get their flu shots annually and always get the flu,but they trust their doctors.I laugh and tell them they ralrely see me sick and I haven't seen a doctor in over twenty years,except for mandatory physicals for work.Some are smart enough to take the time to research or read what is spoonfed them.Others just blindly trust their doctors and what they see and hear on tv.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Vaccine myths unraveling: 600 percent increase in number of parents refusing vaccinations for their children (Australia) 21 Feb 2015 08:14 #24

  • PFIZIPFEI
  • PFIZIPFEI's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • WORDS are my SWORD
  • Posts: 20381
  • Likes received: 7951
If the headline is true

Vaccine myths unraveling: 600 percent increase in number of parents refusing vaccinations for their children (Australia)

then why is the number of children with e.g. AUTISM - supposedly caused by vaccines according to several members on this forum - rising?

:dunno:
"The truth must be repeated over and over again,
because error is repeatedly preached among us, not
only by individuals, but by the masses. In periodicals
and cyclopaedias, in schools and universities; every-
where, in fact, error prevails, and is quite easy in the
feeling that it has a decided majority on its side."

~ J. W. v. Goethe

Johannes Lang "The Hollow World Theory" Blog
My Zone by PFIZIPFEI
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Vaccine myths unraveling: 600 percent increase in number of parents refusing vaccinations for their children (Australia) 21 Feb 2015 09:47 #25

  • zax
  • zax's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Gold Member
  • Posts: 5812
  • Likes received: 1560
Vaccinations: Deadly Immunity

Government Cover-up of a Mercury/Autism Scandal

by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Rollingstone.com, 20 July 2005

In June 2000, a group of top government scientists and health officials gathered for a meeting at the isolated Simpsonwood conference center in Norcross, Georgia. Convened by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the meeting was held at this Methodist retreat center, nestled in wooded farmland next to the Chattahoochee River, to ensure complete secrecy. The agency had issued no public announcement of the session — only private invitations to fifty-two attendees. There were high-level officials from the CDC and the Food and Drug Administration, the top vaccine specialist from the World Health Organization in Geneva and representatives of every major vaccine manufacturer, including GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Wyeth and Aventis Pasteur. All of the scientific data under discussion, CDC officials repeatedly reminded the participants, was strictly “embargoed.” There would be no making photocopies of documents, no taking papers with them when they left.

The federal officials and industry representatives had assembled to discuss a disturbing new study that raised alarming questions about the safety of a host of common childhood vaccines administered to infants and young children. According to a CDC epidemiologist named Tom Verstraeten, who had analyzed the agency’s massive database containing the medical records of 100,000 children, a mercury-based preservative in the vaccines — thimerosal — appeared to be responsible for a dramatic increase in autism and a host of other neurological disorders among children. “I was actually stunned by what I saw,” Verstraeten told those assembled at Simpsonwood, citing the staggering number of earlier studies that indicate a link between thimerosal and speech delays, attention-deficit disorder, hyperactivity and autism. Since 1991, when the CDC and the FDA had recommended that three additional vaccines laced with the preservative be given to extremely young infants — in one case, within hours of birth — the estimated number of cases of autism had increased fifteenfold, from one in every 2,500 children to one in 166 children.

Even for scientists and doctors accustomed to confronting issues of life and death, the findings were frightening. “You can play with this all you want,” Dr. Bill Weil, a consultant for the American Academy of Pediatrics, told the group. The results “are statistically significant.” Dr. Richard Johnston, an immunologist and pediatrician from the University of Colorado whose grandson had been born early on the morning of the meeting’s first day, was even more alarmed. “My gut feeling?” he said. “Forgive this personal comment — I do not want my grandson to get a thimerosal-containing vaccine until we know better what is going on.”

But instead of taking immediate steps to alert the public and rid the vaccine supply of thimerosal, the officials and executives at Simpsonwood spent most of the next two days discussing how to cover up the damaging data. According to transcripts obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, many at the meeting were concerned about how the damaging revelations about thimerosal would affect the vaccine industry’s bottom line. “We are in a bad position from the standpoint of defending any lawsuits,” said Dr. Robert Brent, a pediatrician at the Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children in Delaware. “This will be a resource to our very busy plaintiff attorneys in this country.” Dr. Bob Chen, head of vaccine safety for the CDC, expressed relief that “given the sensitivity of the information, we have been able to keep it out of the hands of, let’s say, less responsible hands.” Dr. John Clements, vaccines advisor at the World Health Organization, declared that “perhaps this study should not have been done at all.” He added that “the research results have to be handled,” warning that the study “will be taken by others and will be used in other ways beyond the control of this group.”

In fact, the government has proved to be far more adept at handling the damage than at protecting children’s health. The CDC paid the Institute of Medicine to conduct a new study to whitewash the risks of thimerosal, ordering researchers to “rule out” the chemical’s link to autism. It withheld Verstraeten’s findings, even though they had been slated for immediate publication, and told other scientists that his original data had been “lost” and could not be replicated. And to thwart the Freedom of Information Act, it handed its giant database of vaccine records over to a private company, declaring it off-limits to researchers. By the time Verstraeten finally published his study in 2003, he had gone to work for GlaxoSmithKline and reworked his data to bury the link between thimerosal and autism.

Vaccine manufacturers had already begun to phase thimerosal out of injections given to American infants — but they continued to sell off their mercury-based supplies of vaccines until last year. The CDC and FDA gave them a hand, buying up the tainted vaccines for export to developing countries and allowing drug companies to continue using the preservative in some American vaccines — including several pediatric flu shots as well as tetanus boosters routinely given to eleven-year-olds.

The drug companies are also getting help from powerful lawmakers in Washington. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, who has received $873,000 in contributions from the pharmaceutical industry, has been working to immunize vaccine makers from liability in 4,200 lawsuits that have been filed by the parents of injured children. On five separate occasions, Frist has tried to seal all of the government’s vaccine-related documents — including the Simpsonwood transcripts — and shield Eli Lilly, the developer of thimerosal, from subpoenas. In 2002, the day after Frist quietly slipped a rider known as the “Eli Lilly Protection Act” into a homeland security bill, the company contributed $10,000 to his campaign and bought 5,000 copies of his book on bioterrorism. The measure was repealed by Congress in 2003 — but earlier this year, Frist slipped another provision into an anti-terrorism bill that would deny compensation to children suffering from vaccine-related brain disorders. “The lawsuits are of such magnitude that they could put vaccine producers out of business and limit our capacity to deal with a biological attack by terrorists,” says Dean Rosen, health policy adviser to Frist.

Even many conservatives are shocked by the government’s effort to cover up the dangers of thimerosal. Rep. Dan Burton, a Republican from Indiana, oversaw a three-year investigation of thimerosal after his grandson was diagnosed with autism. “Thimerosal used as a preservative in vaccines is directly related to the autism epidemic,” his House Government Reform Committee concluded in its final report. “This epidemic in all probability may have been prevented or curtailed had the FDA not been asleep at the switch regarding a lack of safety data regarding injected thimerosal, a known neurotoxin.” The FDA and other public-health agencies failed to act, the committee added, out of “institutional malfeasance for self protection” and “misplaced protectionism of the pharmaceutical industry.”

The story of how government health agencies colluded with Big Pharma to hide the risks of thimerosal from the public is a chilling case study of institutional arrogance, power and greed. I was drawn into the controversy only reluctantly. As an attorney and environmentalist who has spent years working on issues of mercury toxicity, I frequently met mothers of autistic children who were absolutely convinced that their kids had been injured by vaccines. Privately, I was skeptical.

I doubted that autism could be blamed on a single source, and I certainly understood the government’s need to reassure parents that vaccinations are safe; the eradication of deadly childhood diseases depends on it. I tended to agree with skeptics like Rep. Henry Waxman, a Democrat from California, who criticized his colleagues on the House Government Reform Committee for leaping to conclusions about autism and vaccinations. “Why should we scare people about immunization,” Waxman pointed out at one hearing, “until we know the facts?”

It was only after reading the Simpsonwood transcripts, studying the leading scientific research and talking with many of the nation’s pre-eminent authorities on mercury that I became convinced that the link between thimerosal and the epidemic of childhood neurological disorders is real. Five of my own children are members of the Thimerosal Generation — those born between 1989 and 2003 — who received heavy doses of mercury from vaccines. “The elementary grades are overwhelmed with children who have symptoms of neurological or immune-system damage,” Patti White, a school nurse, told the House Government Reform Committee in 1999. “Vaccines are supposed to be making us healthier; however, in twenty-five years of nursing I have never seen so many damaged, sick kids. Something very, very wrong is happening to our children.”

More than 500,000 kids currently suffer from autism, and pediatricians diagnose more than 40,000 new cases every year. The disease was unknown until 1943, when it was identified and diagnosed among eleven children born in the months after thimerosal was first added to baby vaccines in 1931.

Some skeptics dispute that the rise in autism is caused by thimerosal-tainted vaccinations. They argue that the increase is a result of better diagnosis — a theory that seems questionable at best, given that most of the new cases of autism are clustered within a single generation of children. “If the epidemic is truly an artifact of poor diagnosis,” scoffs Dr. Boyd Haley, one of the world’s authorities on mercury toxicity, “then where are all the twenty-year-old autistics?” Other researchers point out that Americans are exposed to a greater cumulative “load” of mercury than ever before, from contaminated fish to dental fillings, and suggest that thimerosal in vaccines may be only part of a much larger problem. It’s a concern that certainly deserves far more attention than it has received — but it overlooks the fact that the mercury concentrations in vaccines dwarf other sources of exposure to our children.

What is most striking is the lengths to which many of the leading detectives have gone to ignore — and cover up — the evidence against thimerosal. From the very beginning, the scientific case against the mercury additive has been overwhelming. The preservative, which is used to stem fungi and bacterial growth in vaccines, contains ethylmercury, a potent neurotoxin. Truckloads of studies have shown that mercury tends to accumulate in the brains of primates and other animals after they are injected with vaccines — and that the developing brains of infants are particularly susceptible. In 1977, a Russian study found that adults exposed to much lower concentrations of ethylmercury than those given to American children still suffered brain damage years later. Russia banned thimerosal from children’s vaccines twenty years ago, and Denmark, Austria, Japan, Great Britain and all the Scandinavian countries have since followed suit.


“You couldn’t even construct a study that shows thimerosal is safe,” says Haley, who heads the chemistry department at the University of Kentucky. “It’s just too darn toxic. If you inject thimerosal into an animal, its brain will sicken. If you apply it to living tissue, the cells die. If you put it in a petri dish, the culture dies. Knowing these things, it would be shocking if one could inject it into an infant without causing damage.”

Internal documents reveal that Eli Lilly, which first developed thimerosal, knew from the start that its product could cause damage — and even death — in both animals and humans. In 1930, the company tested thimerosal by administering it to twenty-two patients with terminal meningitis, all of whom died within weeks of being injected — a fact Lilly didn’t bother to report in its study declaring thimerosal safe. In 1935, researchers at another vaccine manufacturer, Pittman-Moore, warned Lilly that its claims about thimerosal’s safety “did not check with ours.” Half the dogs Pittman injected with thimerosal-based vaccines became sick, leading researchers there to declare the preservative “unsatisfactory as a serum intended for use on dogs.”

In the decades that followed, the evidence against thimerosal continued to mount. During the Second World War, when the Department of Defense used the preservative in vaccines on soldiers, it required Lilly to label it “poison.” In 1967, a study in Applied Microbiology found that thimerosal killed mice when added to injected vaccines. Four years later, Lilly’s own studies discerned that thimerosal was “toxic to tissue cells” in concentrations as low as one part per million — 100 times weaker than the concentration in a typical vaccine. Even so, the company continued to promote thimerosal as “nontoxic” and also incorporated it into topical disinfectants. In 1977, ten babies at a Toronto hospital died when an antiseptic preserved with thimerosal was dabbed onto their umbilical cords.

In 1982, the FDA proposed a ban on over-the-counter products that contained thimerosal, and in 1991 the agency considered banning it from animal vaccines. But tragically, that same year, the CDC recommended that infants be injected with a series of mercury-laced vaccines. Newborns would be vaccinated for hepatitis B within twenty-four hours of birth, and two-month-old infants would be immunized for haemophilus influenzae B and diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis.

The drug industry knew the additional vaccines posed a danger. The same year that the CDC approved the new vaccines, Dr. Maurice Hilleman, one of the fathers of Merck’s vaccine programs, warned the company that six-month-olds who were administered the shots would suffer dangerous exposure to mercury. He recommended that thimerosal be discontinued, “especially when used on infants and children,” noting that the industry knew of nontoxic alternatives. “The best way to go,” he added, “is to switch to dispensing the actual vaccines without adding preservatives.”

For Merck and other drug companies, however, the obstacle was money. Thimerosal enables the pharmaceutical industry to package vaccines in vials that contain multiple doses, which require additional protection because they are more easily contaminated by multiple needle entries. The larger vials cost half as much to produce as smaller, single-dose vials, making it cheaper for international agencies to distribute them to impoverished regions at risk of epidemics. Faced with this “cost consideration,” Merck ignored Hilleman’s warnings, and government officials continued to push more and more thimerosal-based vaccines for children. Before 1989, American preschoolers received eleven vaccinations — for polio, diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis and measles-mumps-rubella. A decade later, thanks to federal recommendations, children were receiving a total of twenty-two immunizations by the time they reached first grade.

As the number of vaccines increased, the rate of autism among children exploded. During the 1990s, 40 million children were injected with thimerosal-based vaccines, receiving unprecedented levels of mercury during a period critical for brain development. Despite the well-documented dangers of thimerosal, it appears that no one bothered to add up the cumulative dose of mercury that children would receive from the mandated vaccines. “What took the FDA so long to do the calculations?” Peter Patriarca, director of viral products for the agency, asked in an e-mail to the CDC in 1999. “Why didn’t CDC and the advisory bodies do these calculations when they rapidly expanded the childhood immunization schedule?”

But by that time, the damage was done. At two months, when the infant brain is still at a critical stage of development, infants routinely received three inoculations that contained a total of 62.5 micrograms of ethylmercury — a level 99 times greater than the EPA’s limit for daily exposure to methylmercury, a related neurotoxin. Although the vaccine industry insists that ethylmercury poses little danger because it breaks down rapidly and is removed by the body, several studies — including one published in April by the National Institutes of Health — suggest that ethylmercury is actually more toxic to developing brains and stays in the brain longer than methylmercury.

Officials responsible for childhood immunizations insist that the additional vaccines were necessary to protect infants from disease and that thimerosal is still essential in developing nations, which, they often claim, cannot afford the single-dose vials that don’t require a preservative. Dr. Paul Offit, one of CDC’s top vaccine advisers, told me, “I think if we really have an influenza pandemic — and certainly we will in the next twenty years, because we always do — there’s no way on God’s earth that we immunize 280 million people with single-dose vials. There has to be multidose vials.”

But while public-health officials may have been well-intentioned, many of those on the CDC advisory committee who backed the additional vaccines had close ties to the industry. Dr. Sam Katz, the committee’s chair, was a paid consultant for most of the major vaccine makers and was part of a team that developed the measles vaccine and brought it to licensure in 1963. Dr. Neal Halsey, another committee member, worked as a researcher for the vaccine companies and received honoraria from Abbott Labs for his research on the hepatitis B vaccine.

Indeed, in the tight circle of scientists who work on vaccines, such conflicts of interest are common. Rep. Burton says that the CDC “routinely allows scientists with blatant conflicts of interest to serve on intellectual advisory committees that make recommendations on new vaccines,” even though they have “interests in the products and companies for which they are supposed to be providing unbiased oversight.” The House Government Reform Committee discovered that four of the eight CDC advisers who approved guidelines for a rotavirus vaccine “had financial ties to the pharmaceutical companies that were developing different versions of the vaccine.”

Offit, who shares a patent on one of the vaccines, acknowledged to me that he “would make money” if his vote eventually leads to a marketable product. But he dismissed my suggestion that a scientist’s direct financial stake in CDC approval might bias his judgment. “It provides no conflict for me,” he insists. “I have simply been informed by the process, not corrupted by it. When I sat around that table, my sole intent was trying to make recommendations that best benefited the children in this country. It’s offensive to say that physicians and public-health people are in the pocket of industry and thus are making decisions that they know are unsafe for children. It’s just not the way it works.”

Other vaccine scientists and regulators gave me similar assurances. Like Offit, they view themselves as enlightened guardians of children’s health, proud of their “partnerships” with pharmaceutical companies, immune to the seductions of personal profit, besieged by irrational activists whose anti-vaccine campaigns are endangering children’s health. They are often resentful of questioning. “Science,” says Offit, “is best left to scientists.”

Still, some government officials were alarmed by the apparent conflicts of interest. In his e-mail to CDC administrators in 1999, Paul Patriarca of the FDA blasted federal regulators for failing to adequately scrutinize the danger posed by the added baby vaccines. “I’m not sure there will be an easy way out of the potential perception that the FDA, CDC and immunization-policy bodies may have been asleep at the switch re: thimerosal until now,” Patriarca wrote. The close ties between regulatory officials and the pharmaceutical industry, he added, “will also raise questions about various advisory bodies regarding aggressive recommendations for use” of thimerosal in child vaccines.

If federal regulators and government scientists failed to grasp the potential risks of thimerosal over the years, no one could claim ignorance after the secret meeting at Simpsonwood. But rather than conduct more studies to test the link to autism and other forms of brain damage, the CDC placed politics over science. The agency turned its database on childhood vaccines — which had been developed largely at taxpayer expense — over to a private agency, America’s Health Insurance Plans, ensuring that it could not be used for additional research. It also instructed the Institute of Medicine, an advisory organization that is part of the National Academy of Sciences, to produce a study debunking the link between thimerosal and brain disorders. The CDC “wants us to declare, well, that these things are pretty safe,” Dr. Marie McCormick, who chaired the IOM’s Immunization Safety Review Committee, told her fellow researchers when they first met in January 2001. “We are not ever going to come down that [autism] is a true side effect” of thimerosal exposure. According to transcripts of the meeting, the committee’s chief staffer, Kathleen Stratton, predicted that the IOM would conclude that the evidence was “inadequate to accept or reject a causal relation” between thimerosal and autism. That, she added, was the result “Walt wants” — a reference to Dr. Walter Orenstein, director of the National Immunization Program for the CDC.

For those who had devoted their lives to promoting vaccination, the revelations about thimerosal threatened to undermine everything they had worked for. “We’ve got a dragon by the tail here,” said Dr. Michael Kaback, another committee member. “The more negative that [our] presentation is, the less likely people are to use vaccination, immunization — and we know what the results of that will be. We are kind of caught in a trap. How we work our way out of the trap, I think is the charge.”

Even in public, federal officials made it clear that their primary goal in studying thimerosal was to dispel doubts about vaccines. “Four current studies are taking place to rule out the proposed link between autism and thimerosal,” Dr. Gordon Douglas, then-director of strategic planning for vaccine research at the National Institutes of Health, assured a Princeton University gathering in May 2001. “In order to undo the harmful effects of research claiming to link the [measles] vaccine to an elevated risk of autism, we need to conduct and publicize additional studies to assure parents of safety.” Douglas formerly served as president of vaccinations for Merck, where he ignored warnings about thimerosal’s risks.

In May of last year, the Institute of Medicine issued its final report. Its conclusion: There is no proven link between autism and thimerosal in vaccines. Rather than reviewing the large body of literature describing the toxicity of thimerosal, the report relied on four disastrously flawed epidemiological studies examining European countries, where children received much smaller doses of thimerosal than American kids. It also cited a new version of the Verstraeten study, published in the journal Pediatrics, that had been reworked to reduce the link between thimerosal and autism. The new study included children too young to have been diagnosed with autism and overlooked others who showed signs of the disease. The IOM declared the case closed and — in a startling position for a scientific body — recommended that no further research be conducted.

The report may have satisfied the CDC, but it convinced no one. Rep. David Weldon, a Republican physician from Florida who serves on the House Government Reform Committee, attacked the Institute of Medicine, saying it relied on a handful of studies that were “fatally flawed” by “poor design” and failed to represent “all the available scientific and medical research.” CDC officials are not interested in an honest search for the truth, Weldon told me, because “an association between vaccines and autism would force them to admit that their policies irreparably damaged thousands of children. Who would want to make that conclusion about themselves?”

Under pressure from Congress and parents, the Institute of Medicine convened another panel to address continuing concerns about the Vaccine Safety Datalink Data Sharing program. In February, the new panel, composed of different scientists, criticized the way the VSD had been used in the Verstraeten study, and urged the CDC to make its vaccine database available to the public.

So far, though, only two scientists have managed to gain access. Dr. Mark Geier, president of the Genetics Center of America, and his son, David, spent a year battling to obtain the medical records from the CDC. Since August 2002, when members of Congress pressured the agency to turn over the data, the Geiers have completed six studies that demonstrate a powerful correlation between thimerosal and neurological damage in children. One study, which compares the cumulative dose of mercury received by children born between 1981 and 1985 with those born between 1990 and 1996, found a “very significant relationship” between autism and vaccines. Another study of educational performance found that kids who received higher doses of thimerosal in vaccines were nearly three times as likely to be diagnosed with autism and more than three times as likely to suffer from speech disorders and mental retardation. Another soon-to-be published study shows that autism rates are in decline following the recent elimination of thimerosal from most vaccines.

As the federal government worked to prevent scientists from studying vaccines, others have stepped in to study the link to autism. In April, reporter Dan Olmsted of UPI undertook one of the more interesting studies himself. Searching for children who had not been exposed to mercury in vaccines — the kind of population that scientists typically use as a “control” in experiments — Olmsted scoured the Amish of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, who refuse to immunize their infants. Given the national rate of autism, Olmsted calculated that there should be 130 autistics among the Amish. He found only four. One had been exposed to high levels of mercury from a power plant. The other three — including one child adopted from outside the Amish community — had received their vaccines.

At the state level, many officials have also conducted in-depth reviews of thimerosal. While the Institute of Medicine was busy whitewashing the risks, the Iowa legislature was carefully combing through all of the available scientific and biological data. “After three years of review, I became convinced there was sufficient credible research to show a link between mercury and the increased incidences in autism,” says state Sen. Ken Veenstra, a Republican who oversaw the investigation. “The fact that Iowa’s 700 percent increase in autism began in the 1990s, right after more and more vaccines were added to the children’s vaccine schedules, is solid evidence alone.” Last year, Iowa became the first state to ban mercury in vaccines, followed by California. Similar bans are now under consideration in thirty-two other states.

But instead of following suit, the FDA continues to allow manufacturers to include thimerosal in scores of over-the-counter medications as well as steroids and injected collagen. Even more alarming, the government continues to ship vaccines preserved with thimerosal to developing countries — some of which are now experiencing a sudden explosion in autism rates. In China, where the disease was virtually unknown prior to the introduction of thimerosal by U.S. drug manufacturers in 1999, news reports indicate that there are now more than 1.8 million autistics. Although reliable numbers are hard to come by, autistic disorders also appear to be soaring in India, Argentina, Nicaragua and other developing countries that are now using thimerosal-laced vaccines. The World Health Organization continues to insist thimerosal is safe, but it promises to keep the possibility that it is linked to neurological disorders “under review.”

I devoted time to study this issue because I believe that this is a moral crisis that must be addressed. If, as the evidence suggests, our public-health authorities knowingly allowed the pharmaceutical industry to poison an entire generation of American children, their actions arguably constitute one of the biggest scandals in the annals of American medicine. “The CDC is guilty of incompetence and gross negligence,” says Mark Blaxill, vice president of Safe Minds, a nonprofit organization concerned about the role of mercury in medicines. “The damage caused by vaccine exposure is massive. It’s bigger than asbestos, bigger than tobacco, bigger than anything you’ve ever seen.”

It’s hard to calculate the damage to our country — and to the international efforts to eradicate epidemic diseases — if Third World nations come to believe that America’s most heralded foreign-aid initiative is poisoning their children. It’s not difficult to predict how this scenario will be interpreted by America’s enemies abroad. The scientists and researchers — many of them sincere, even idealistic — who are participating in efforts to hide the science on thimerosal claim that they are trying to advance the lofty goal of protecting children in developing nations from disease pandemics. They are badly misguided. Their failure to come clean on thimerosal will come back horribly to haunt our country and the world’s poorest populations.

NOTE: This story has been updated to correct several inaccuracies in the original, published version. As originally reported, American preschoolers received only three vaccinations before 1989, but the article failed to note that they were innoculated a total of eleven times with those vaccines, including boosters. The article also misstated the level of ethylmercury received by infants injected with all their shots by the age of six months. It was 187 micrograms – an amount forty percent, not 187 times, greater than the EPA’s limit for daily exposure to methylmercury. Finally, because of an editing error, the article misstated the contents of the rotavirus vaccine approved by the CDC. It did not contain thimerosal. Salon and Rolling Stone regret the errors.

An earlier version of this story stated that the Institute of Medicine convened a second panel to review the work of the Immunization Safety Review Committee that had found no evidence of a link between thimerosal and autism. In fact, the IOM convened the second panel to address continuing concerns about the Vaccine Safety Datalink Data Sharing program, including those raised by critics of the IOM’s earlier work. But the panel was not charged with reviewing the committee’s findings. The story also inadvertently omitted a word and transposed two sentences in a quote by Dr. John Clements, and incorrectly stated that Dr. Sam Katz held a patent with Merck on the measles vaccine. In fact, Dr. Katz was part of a team that developed the vaccine and brought it to licensure, but he never held the patent. Salon and Rolling Stone regret the errors.

CLARIFICATION: After publication of this story, Salon and Rolling Stone corrected an error that misstated the level of ethylmercury received by infants injected with all their shots by the age of six months. It was 187 micrograms ? an amount forty percent, not 187 times, greater than the EPA’s limit for daily exposure to methylmercury. At the time of the correction, we were aware that the comparison itself was flawed, but as journalists we considered it more appropriate to state the correct figure rather than replace it with another number entirely.

Since that earlier correction, however, it has become clear from responses to the article that the forty-percent number, while accurate, is misleading. It measures the total mercury load an infant received from vaccines during the first six months, calculates the daily average received based on average body weight, and then compares that number to the EPA daily limit. But infants did not receive the vaccines as a ?daily average? ? they received massive doses on a single day, through multiple shots. As the story states, these single-day doses exceeded the EPA limit by as much as 99 times. Based on the misunderstanding, and to avoid further confusion, we have amended the story to eliminate the forty-percent figure.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Vaccine myths unraveling: 600 percent increase in number of parents refusing vaccinations for their children (Australia) 21 Feb 2015 10:01 #26

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 18909
  • Likes received: 8917
PFIZIPFEI wrote:
If the headline is true

Vaccine myths unraveling: 600 percent increase in number of parents refusing vaccinations for their children (Australia)

then why is the number of children with e.g. AUTISM - supposedly caused by vaccines according to several members on this forum - rising?

:dunno:

Do you know what australias population is? Its miniscule compared to the rest of the world... the OP is about OZ. So either way (whether vaccines and autism have any correlation or not) , what goes on in OZ wont show up on the world radar or world figures if you will.

This is also a fairly recent phenomenon... back a few years and especially when little johnny was figurehead, the state could do no wrong, but some people seem to be coming out of their collective form of corporate/government licking schizophrenia in recent times.
I remember the good old days, when 90+ year olds in nursing homes lived forever. Darn this pesky virus.

1365 = 1

1.1365 = 1,283,305,580,313,352
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: PFIZIPFEI, Orangeaid

Vaccine myths unraveling: 600 percent increase in number of parents refusing vaccinations for their children (Australia) 21 Feb 2015 11:05 #27

  • zax
  • zax's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Gold Member
  • Posts: 5812
  • Likes received: 1560
It also should be noted that raw numbers at this stage is of little import as the ramping up up of the depop agenda is underway [think Gates and WHO].That is to say the 600% increase in desheepling so to speak is offsetting what would likely be an exponential rise in maladies in coming years.

Doctors Warn Against Dangers of Vaccination (Immunisation)
Firstly, these articles will be of great interest to you:
•Myths of Modern Medicine: The Increase in the Human Life Span - due to Political Social Reforms. This article explains how the great increase in human life span in the developed world (during the 19th and 20th centuries) was due to political social reforms like better sanitation systems and improved hygiene and nutrition.
•Myths of Modern Medicine: The Decline of the Infectious Diseases largely occurred before commercial vaccines, immunisations and drugs were developed for them. This page contains numerous graphs and diagrams that illustrate the statistics and trends.
•Highly Recommended: Association of Doctors Against Vaccination & Immunization.
"Vaccines have never had the proclaimed preventive effect on infections. The regression of infectious diseases started over 200 years ago, which means long before the introduction of vaccination, and it was due to the improved social conditions of the population: nutrition and hygiene.

Contrarily to general belief, the vaccinations have had a negative influence on the decrease of the infective maladies and mortality. Statistics started off at a period when the infectious diseases were already on the downgrade. Careful studies over a period of many years have revealed that each introduction of a mass vaccination has obtained only one result: the immediate recrudescence of the malady that the vaccine should have prevented, but which it has solicited instead. The temporary but immediate isolation of infected patients has each time proved sufficient to prevent an epidemic.

After every flare-up of an infection due to vaccination, the maladies have resumed the downward course which existed already before the vaccination. In general and over a period of many years, every vaccination has caused more casualties than the infection it was supposed to prevent. This happened for instance with the smallpox vaccination in Germany and many other countries.. ..Vaccines don't protect, but do harm. A scientific proof of their usefulness has never existed, whereas the severe, sometimes fatal damages they cause are a proven fact."(source: a talk given at the "The International Congress Of Doctors Against Vivisection" originally printed in CIVIS International Foundation Report Nr. 8", WINTER 1989 - 1990, Massagno - Switzerland, CIVIS.)
Dr. Gerhard Buchwald, MD,
www.blatantpropaganda.org/propaganda/articles/vaccination_doctors.html
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Vaccine myths unraveling: 600 percent increase in number of parents refusing vaccinations for their children (Australia) 27 Feb 2015 13:24 #28

  • Mario
  • Mario's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Mushroom Kingdom
  • You have the Right NOT to Vote! = for EVIL!
  • Posts: 4648
  • Likes received: 1516

Would this mean that we can expect some more criminalizing laws coming for being a >>>

Anti Vaccinesemite

I'm totally anti medication & only in total emergency I get me something ......... only seen once a Doctor in the last 25 years.

My rule is if it does not kill me it only makes me stronger.
I always give my body a minimum of 7 to ten days to fix itself if still sick only then I maybe get me a pill to help my body along.

If I get the flu for some reasons it last 3 to 4 days.
Bit of fruit (Vitamin C), some honey & a bit of Sunshine gets me out of it every time.

So far so good.

Its all part of there agenda game ........ don't know why people don't read through the script guidelines; its all in there.
A bit like a Bible for the evil cabal >>>> All just coincidental ...... well you all your own judge.
Part of the message is hidden for the guests. Please log in or register to see it.
@ oiram @
Last Edit: 27 Feb 2015 13:58 by Mario.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Lizzy

Vaccine myths unraveling: 600 percent increase in number of parents refusing vaccinations for their children (Australia) 27 Feb 2015 14:07 #29

  • Mario
  • Mario's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Mushroom Kingdom
  • You have the Right NOT to Vote! = for EVIL!
  • Posts: 4648
  • Likes received: 1516
Mario wrote:
Vaccination Vaccination Vaccination Vaccination Vaccination

Vaccination Vaccination Vaccination

Vaccination Vaccination

Vaccination


The 1918 Influenza Epidemic was a Vaccine-caused Disease
Posted on July 11, 2009 by Barbara Peterson

FluVictimI. Honorof, E. McBean (Vaccination The Silent Killer p28)
Source: Dr. Rebecca Carley
Very few people realize that the worst epidemic ever to hit America, the Spanish Influenza of 1918 was the after effect of the massive nation-wide vaccine campaign. The doctors told the people that the disease was caused by germs. Viruses were not known at that time or they would have been blamed. Germs, bacteria and viruses, along with bacilli and a few other invisible organisms are the scapegoats, which the doctors like to blame for the things they do not understand. If the doctor makes a wrong diagnosis and treatment, and kills the patient, he can always blame it on the germs, and say the patient didn’t get an early diagnosis and come to him in time.

If we check back in history to that 1918 flu period, we will see that it suddenly struck just after the end of World War I when our soldiers were returning home from overseas. That was the first war in which all the known vaccines were forced on all the servicemen. This mish-mash of poison drugs and putrid protein of which the vaccines were composed, caused such widespread disease and death among the soldiers that it was the common talk of the day, that more of our men were being killed by medical shots than by enemy shots from guns. Thousands were invalided home or to military hospitals, as hopeless wrecks, before they ever saw a day of battle. The death and disease rate among the vaccinated soldiers was four times higher than among the unvaccinated civilians. But this did not stop the vaccine promoters. Vaccine has always been big business, and so it was continued doggedly.

It was a shorter war than the vaccine-makers had planned on, only about a year for us, so the vaccine promoters had a lot of unused, spoiling vaccines left over which they wanted to sell at a good profit. So they did what they usually do, they called a meeting behind closed doors, and plotted the whole sordid program, a nationwide (worldwide) vaccination drive using all their vaccines, and telling the people that the soldiers were coming home with many dread diseases contracted in foreign countries and that it was the patriotic duty of every man, woman and child to get "protected" by rushing down to the vaccination centers and having all the shots.

Most people believe :thdown: :thdown: :thdown: their doctors and government officials, and do what they say. The result was, that almost the entire population submitted to the shots without question, and it was only a matter of hours until people began dropping dead in agony, while many others collapsed with a disease of such virulence that no one had ever seen anything like it before. They had all the characteristics of the diseases they had been vaccinated against, the high fever, chills, pain, cramps, diarrhea, etc. of typhoid, and the pneumonia like lung and throat congestion of diphtheria and the vomiting, headache, weakness and misery of hepatitis from the jungle fever shots, and the outbreak of sores on the skin from the smallpox shots, along with paralysis from all the shots, etc.

The doctors were baffled, and claimed they didn’t know what caused the strange and deadly disease, and they certainly had no cure. They should have known the underlying cause was the vaccinations, because the same thing happened to the soldiers after they had their shots at camp. The typhoid fever shots caused a worse form of the disease, which they called para-typhoid. Then they tried to suppress the symptoms of that one with a stronger vaccine, which caused a still more serious disease, which killed and disabled a great many men.

The combination of all the poison vaccines fermenting together in the body, caused such violent reactions that they could not cope with the situation. Disaster ran rampant in the camps. Some of the military hospitals were filled with nothing but paralyzed soldiers, and they were called war casualties, even before they left American soil. I talked to some of the survivors of that vaccine onslaught when they returned home after the war, and they told of the horrors, not of the war itself, and battles, but of the sickness at camp.

The doctors didn’t want this massive vaccine disease to reflect on them, so they, agreed among themselves to call it Spanish Influenza. Spain was a far away place and some of the soldiers had been there, so the idea of calling it Spanish Influenza seemed to be a good way to lay the blame on someone else. The Spanish resented having us name the world scourge on them. They knew the flu didn’t originate in their country.
20,000,000 died of that flu epidemic, worldwide, and it seemed to be almost universal or as far away as the vaccinations reached. Greece and a few other countries, which did not accept the vaccines, were the only ones that were not hit by the flu. Doesn’t that prove something?

At home (in the U.S.) the situation was the same; the only ones who escaped the influenza were those who had refused the vaccinations. My family and 1 were among the few who persisted in refusing the high pressure sales propaganda, and none of us had the flu not even a sniffle, in spite of the fact that it was all around us, and in the bitter cold of winter.

Everyone seemed to have it. The whole town was down sick and dying. The hospitals were closed because the doctors and nurses were down with the flu. Everything was closed, schools, businesses, post office everything. No one was on the streets. It was like a ghost town. There were no doctors to care for the sick, so my parents went from house to house doing what they could to help the stricken in any way they could. They spent all day and part of the night for weeks, in the sick rooms, and came home only to eat and sleep. If germs or viruses, bacteria, or any other little organisms were the cause of that disease, they had plenty of opportunity to latch onto my parents and "lay them low" with the disease that had prostrated the world. But germs were not the cause of that or any other disease, so they didn’t "catch" it. I have talked to a few other people since that time, who said they escaped the 1918 flu, so I asked if they had the shots, and in every case, they said they had never believed :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: in shots and had never had any of them. Common sense tells us that all those toxic vaccines all mixed up together in people, could not help but cause extreme body-poisoning and poisoning of some kind or another is usually the cause of disease.

Whenever a person coughs or sneezes, most people cringe, thinking that the germs are being spread around in the air and will attack people. There is no need to fear those germs any more, because that is not the way colds are developed. Germs can’t live apart from the cells (host) and can’t do harm anyway, even if they wanted to. They have no teeth to bite anyone, no poison pouches like snakes, mosquitoes or bees, and do not multiply, except in decomposed substances, so they are helpless to harm. As stated before, their purpose is useful, not destructive.

The 1918 flu was the most devastating disease we ever had, and it brought forth all the medical bag of tricks to quell it, but those added drugs, all of which are poisons, only intensified the over-poisoned condition of the people, so the treatments actually killed more than the flu did.
http://spktruth2power.wordpress.com/2009/07/11/the-1918-influenza-epidemic-was-a-vaccine-caused-disease/ 



As I said once before somewhere ..... believes can Kill you!! & it did kill multi millions!

So make sure your beliefs are strong as always ........... & don't forget to Vote for your Masters you belief in!!


& & & &

Believing & dying is easy;
but listening is hard and painful
Because then you got to watch all the believers die in-front of you!

@ oiram @
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Vaccine myths unraveling: 600 percent increase in number of parents refusing vaccinations for their children (Australia) 27 Feb 2015 14:24 #30

  • Lizzy
  • Lizzy's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Gold Member
  • Posts: 5036
  • Likes received: 3051
This is why mandatory vaccination has arrived and will become commonplace - the sheep will follow along. Yes. more are waking up but if your child is refused school enrollment many will buckle - they're already being targeted as irresponsible and a threat to the vaccinated - when the reverse it true.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Vaccine myths unraveling: 600 percent increase in number of parents refusing vaccinations for their children (Australia) 27 Feb 2015 20:47 #31

  • Lizzy
  • Lizzy's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Gold Member
  • Posts: 5036
  • Likes received: 3051
Oregon Senator Mandating Vaccines Gets A Dose of Her Own Hypocrisy



‘When State Senator Elizabeth Steiner Hayward, author of a bill to destroy informed consent and mandate vaccines, was confronted about medical choices she made against the advice and warnings of her physician and the pharmaceutical company, she became indignant. Why do we tolerate hypocritical, medical tyrants like her?’

( not an AJ fan but if that's where the info leads me , I'll post it. )

Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: Orangeaid

Vaccine myths unraveling: 600 percent increase in number of parents refusing vaccinations for their children (Australia) 04 Mar 2015 02:01 #32

  • wiikkidd
  • wiikkidd's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Gold Member
  • Posts: 5884
  • Likes received: 997
HERE: henrymakow.com/2015/03/science-confirms-vaccines.html Your asking for damage if you accept any of these toxins made by men without a soul.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Vaccine myths unraveling: 600 percent increase in number of parents refusing vaccinations for their children (Australia) 01 Jun 2015 10:13 #33

  • Orangeaid
  • Orangeaid's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 11646
  • Likes received: 8032
"I have no faith in vaccination; nay, I look upon it with the greatest possible disgust, and firmly believe that it is often the medium of conveying many filthy and loathsome diseases from one child to another, and no protection whatever against small pox. Indeed, I consider we are now living in the JENNERIAN epoch for the slaughter of innocents, and the unthinking portion of the adult population."---W. J. COLLINS, M.D., B.S., B.Sc. (Lond.) M.R.C.S 1883
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Vaccine myths unraveling: 600 percent increase in number of parents refusing vaccinations for their children (Australia) 12 Jun 2017 11:24 #34

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 18909
  • Likes received: 8917
I remember the good old days, when 90+ year olds in nursing homes lived forever. Darn this pesky virus.

1365 = 1

1.1365 = 1,283,305,580,313,352
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: I AM ALL I AM

Vaccine myths unraveling: 600 percent increase in number of parents refusing vaccinations for their children (Australia) 13 Jun 2017 15:40 #35

  • I AM ALL I AM
  • I AM ALL I AM's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 2439
  • Likes received: 740
You cannot reason someone out of a position that they didn't reason themselves into.

When paired opposites define your beliefs, your beliefs will imprison you.


Flare = Censor & Promoter of Bishop Williamson

truth-zone.net/forum/research-zone-forum-feedback-and-faq/73338-flare-censor-promoter-of-bishop-williamson.html#357334
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: novum, backfromthebrink

Vaccine myths unraveling: 600 percent increase in number of parents refusing vaccinations for their children (Australia) 27 Sep 2017 15:07 #36

It's all about manipulating your dna and cutting you off from the source ,vaccines,flouride,big pharma,chemicals,radiation it all plays its part
This is how the ''elite'' work ,they want to remove the spark that was given to use a long time ago
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: novum, rodin

Vaccine myths unraveling: 600 percent increase in number of parents refusing vaccinations for their children (Australia) 28 Sep 2017 12:04 #37

  • I AM ALL I AM
  • I AM ALL I AM's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 2439
  • Likes received: 740
Description of the measure

From 1 January 2016, immunisation requirements for Family Tax Benefit (FTB) Part A end of year supplement, Child Care Benefit (CCB), and Child Care Rebate (CCR) will be extended to include children of all ages up to, and including, 19 years of age.

The Australian Childhood Immunisation Register will be expanded to capture and report on children’s immunisation status for payments up to, and including, 19 years of age. Children not up-to-date with their childhood immunisations will need to follow a catch-up schedule.

‘Conscientious objections’ will be re-termed ‘vaccination objections’ and will no longer be a valid exemption category. Child care assistance and the FTB Part A supplement will not be paid to customers who fail to comply with immunisation requirements, or who do not have a valid exemption.

For more information visit the Department of Social Services website.

Questions and answers

Who is affected by this measure

This measure will affect families with children up to, and including, 19 years of age who are eligible for:

FTB Part A end of year supplement
CCB and CCR
The measure also affects those customers who access:

Grandparent Child Care Benefit
Jobs, Education, Training Child Care Fee Assistance
Who is eligible for this measure

Families with children up to, and including, 19 years of age who are eligible for:

FTB Part A end of year supplement
CCB and CCR
The date this measure will start and finish

This measure will start on 1 January 2016 and is ongoing.

www.humanservices.gov.au/organisations/about-us/budget/budget-2015-16/budget-measures/families/no-jab-no-pay
You cannot reason someone out of a position that they didn't reason themselves into.

When paired opposites define your beliefs, your beliefs will imprison you.


Flare = Censor & Promoter of Bishop Williamson

truth-zone.net/forum/research-zone-forum-feedback-and-faq/73338-flare-censor-promoter-of-bishop-williamson.html#357334
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: novum

Vaccine myths unraveling: 600 percent increase in number of parents refusing vaccinations for their children (Australia) 29 Sep 2017 01:30 #38

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 18909
  • Likes received: 8917
Low vaccine uptake so theyre doing it by force via financial penalties for not getting your children jabbed.

Orwellian control freakery that cant look like anything but what it is... and the politicians and policy makers of Australia once again confirming to people with any semblance of intelligence that they are puppets for big pharma and globalist agendas.
I remember the good old days, when 90+ year olds in nursing homes lived forever. Darn this pesky virus.

1365 = 1

1.1365 = 1,283,305,580,313,352
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
User(s) who Liked this post: I AM ALL I AM, Roastie

Vaccine myths unraveling: 600 percent increase in number of parents refusing vaccinations for their children (Australia) 29 Sep 2017 08:59 #39

  • I AM ALL I AM
  • I AM ALL I AM's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 2439
  • Likes received: 740
G'day Novum.

Yeah, definitely desperate. There are too many people objecting and or refusing vaccinations. It is why they are attempting to force it through the schooling (read: indoctrinating) system. There are still a lot of hold outs. A friends daughter has found preschools and a school for the children that do not demand vaccination. The question is not how many will be bucking the system, it is what enforcement measures are going to be meted out to those that do.

Those reliant upon government payments, whether through disability or single parent pension, do not have the financial resources to do battle with the government in court, and their reliance upon benefits puts them behind the 8-ball.

It all shows how vulnerable their positions are. When we simply walk away from the government dependency, they are left with fuck all ... and they know it. Keep them dumbed down, lethargic, preoccupied and distracted. Healthy enough to push a few buttons and shuffle paper from one side of a desk to another, yet not healthy enough to revolt.

In the long run, all they do is provide us with such obvious ENSLAVEMENT tactics that it becomes easy to expose them to those not recognising it previously. There are plenty of people not impressed with this issue, a cashless society (an 80 odd year old women mentioned it to me the other day :D ), among other issues. If the resentment rises high enough, those in authority are in for some serious repercussions. :thumbup:
You cannot reason someone out of a position that they didn't reason themselves into.

When paired opposites define your beliefs, your beliefs will imprison you.


Flare = Censor & Promoter of Bishop Williamson

truth-zone.net/forum/research-zone-forum-feedback-and-faq/73338-flare-censor-promoter-of-bishop-williamson.html#357334
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Vaccine myths unraveling: 600 percent increase in number of parents refusing vaccinations for their children (Australia) 09 Feb 2019 22:32 #40

  • Roastie
  • Roastie's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Silver Member
  • Posts: 2962
  • Likes received: 2260
Lizzy wrote:
Oregon Senator Mandating Vaccines Gets A Dose of Her Own Hypocrisy



‘When State Senator Elizabeth Steiner Hayward, author of a bill to destroy informed consent and mandate vaccines, was confronted about medical choices she made against the advice and warnings of her physician and the pharmaceutical company, she became indignant. Why do we tolerate hypocritical, medical tyrants like her?’

( not an AJ fan but if that's where the info leads me , I'll post it. )


Truthstream media include a segment about the hypocritical Steiner Hayward in a recent video.

“The simple step of a courageous individual is not to take part in the lie." Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2
Moderators: novum, rodin, Flare
Powered by Kunena Forum

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2020 - May 2021, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 250 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 192 - Raised
( £ 140 GBP )
donation thermometer
56%
Most Recent Donation $122 USD
4th January 2021
Bitcoin Address: bc1q0kazqya0nurfxtunxv807vm0m8852nnrrk8mj8
 
Ethereum Address: 0xe69915c80dd75df19f438d556267e04f932f057d
 
More Info: Donation options for TZ
 

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.