Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: Millions wasted in federal school lunch program Fresh fruits, vegetables winding up in trash

Millions wasted in federal school lunch program Fresh fruits, vegetables winding up in trash 18 Sep 2014 18:00 #1

  • ..........
  • ..........'s Avatar
  • Offline
  • Straight Shooter
  • Posts: 10294
  • Likes received: 2923
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Millions wasted in federal school lunch program Fresh fruits, vegetables winding up in trash 18 Sep 2014 19:29 #2

  • Cinta
  • Cinta's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Never Again
  • ''None are more hopelessly enslaved,than those who falsely believe they are free
  • Posts: 5333
  • Likes received: 1066
In the Netherlands we don't have school lunches.
There seems to be a lot at stake though with the so called school lunches.
Isn't there a saying : '' you are what you eat ''
If students are not used to eating healthy foods at home;they won't
eat healthy food at school too.
It is hard to change these bad eating habits;people are litterally poisoned
with all this pre fabricated ''food''.

''School Lunches: How The Food Industry Controls Student Meals''

''An increasingly cozy alliance between companies that manufacture processed
foods and companies that serve the meals is making students — a captive market
— fat and sick while pulling in hundreds of millions of dollars in profits.
At a time of fiscal austerity, these companies are seducing school administrators
with promises to cut costs through privatization. Parents who want healthier meals,
meanwhile, are outgunned.''

''Each day, 32 million children in the United States get lunch at schools that
participate in the National School Lunch Program, which uses agricultural surplus
to feed children. About 21 million of these students eat free or reduced-price meals,
a number that has surged since the recession. The program, which also provides
breakfast, costs $13.3 billion a year.
Sadly, it is being mismanaged and exploited. About a quarter of the school nutrition
program has been privatized, much of it outsourced to food service management
giants like Aramark, based in Philadelphia; Sodexo, based in France; and the
Chartwells division of the Compass Group, based in Britain. They work in tandem
with food manufacturers like the chicken producers Tyson and Pilgrim’s, all of
which profit when good food is turned to bad.''

''The Government-Industry Conspiracy that Promotes Crap Food in School''
Industry and government work together to promote everything from fast-food
pizza to sugary milk in schools.''

''Dairy lobbyists are ever present in Washington, and their efforts usually pay off.
For example, last year when the IDFA implored the U.S. Department of Agriculture
(USDA) to give dairy foods a pass in the new snack food guidelines for schools,
the agency capitulated, opening school doors to even more junk food, such as
YoCrunch Lowfat Yogurt with M&Ms.''

''This is just one of many examples I uncovered in a report I published last month,
" Whitewashed: How Industry and Government Promote Dairy Junk Foods" (PDF).
The dairy industry, propped up by government, has convinced us of the health
benefits of milk and other dairy products. The assumption that eating dairy is
essential to the diet has obstructed our ability to criticize federal government
support for unhealthy dairy products, of which there are many.''
This kind of disgusting and disrespectful behaviour is condoned here

ORANGEAID verbal abuse

''Cinta is a whore.
I don't change one word I've said.''

Last Edit: 18 Sep 2014 19:30 by Cinta.
Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.

Millions wasted in federal school lunch program Fresh fruits, vegetables winding up in trash 03 May 2016 22:55 #3

  • ..........
  • ..........'s Avatar
  • Offline
  • Straight Shooter
  • Posts: 10294
  • Likes received: 2923
Congress takes a discouraging turn on school lunches
When it comes to public schools providing meals for low-income children, congressional Republicans have built up a discouraging record in recent years. In 2014, for example, a GOP congressman from Georgia suggested struggling children should either pay more for school meals or tackle janitorial tasks in their schools in exchange for food.

Around the same time, House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) delivered a speech suggesting kids who rely on school lunches aren’t cared for as much as kids who bring their own lunch to school. The far-right lawmaker, we later learned, was relying on an anecdote that turned out to be made-up.

That was the last Congress. In this Congress, Jared Bernstein and Ben Spielberg made the case in the Washington Post yesterday that Republican lawmakers are eyeing new restrictions on the federal program.

Under current law, changed by Democrats in 2010, schools don’t have to verify which individual students are eligible for free or reduced-price meals. Rather, if a school serves a community in which 40% of the kids are eligible for meal assistance – called the “Identified Student Percentage” – the schools can make food available to all of its students. It streamlines the bureaucracy and verification process, cuts down on paperwork, and helps ensure children receive the benefits to which they’re entitled under the law.

A new GOP proposal wants to change the status quo. From the Bernstein/Spielberg piece:
[A] new proposal by congressional conservatives would restrict community eligibility, substantially increasing administrative burdens in more than 7,000 schools and threatening 3.4 million students’ access to school meals. For no good reason that we can see, lawmakers from the Education and the Workforce Committee may vote soon to raise the ISP threshold from 40 percent to 60 percent. Because [Identified Student Percentage] numbers don’t capture low-income students who must typically apply for free or reduced-price meals, this threshold would render all but the highest-poverty schools (generally those in which more than 90 percent of students qualify for free or reduced-price meals) ineligible for community eligibility.

Raising the threshold would save a little bit of money, as fewer students would qualify for free school meals, but the overall savings of about $1.6 billion over 10 years wouldn’t come close to offsetting the administrative burden, increased social stigma for low-income students, and negative health and academic effects it could create.
And that’s a problem.

As Slate’s Laura Moser added, “[A]s of 2013, 51 percent of American public-school students were low-income, and by raising the eligibility threshold to 60 percent, quite a few students would fall through the donut hole.”

In fairness, the GOP plan wants to redirect the savings into related food programs, including meals for students attending summer school. That’s hardly an unreasonable goal – and it’s far better than redirecting school-lunch money to, say, tax breaks for millionaires.

But there’s no reason the wealthiest country in the world can’t do both. As the Post piece explained, “[W]hy pit an important program, one that school officials absolutely love, against these other worthy objectives? Instead, we should raise the money necessary (a small amount) to make sure students have breakfasts and lunches during both the school year and the summer.”

Only registered members can reply. Create an Account to join the discussion.
Moderators: novum, rodin, Flare
Powered by Kunena Forum

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2020 - May 2021, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 250 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 192 - Raised
( £ 140 GBP )
donation thermometer
Most Recent Donation $122 USD
4th January 2021
Bitcoin Address: bc1q0kazqya0nurfxtunxv807vm0m8852nnrrk8mj8
Ethereum Address: 0xe69915c80dd75df19f438d556267e04f932f057d
More Info: Donation options for TZ

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.