TOPIC: WHAT Is NASA Hiding In This Area Of Space?

Pretty cool watching that triangular object jamming along @ about 1:50 into the video.


So, September 23, 2017 is a biblical event? I don't believe it, but, we'll see?

1) NASA creates database of sky images from legacy astronomical high power observatory/radio telescopes..

2) NASA then inserts obviously fake moving UFO images against sky backdrop. (Peacenik's Secret Space Weapons Bull$hit)

3) NASA then COEvertly inserts a black rectangle over the area......

4) Yawn......ZZZZZZZZ

Exorcist wrote:
Why don't you save yourself some time, and and just declare, 'EVERYTHING as a hoax? It would be easier on us all. Seriously, all you do when you post is demonstrate just how incapable you are of thinking out side of your box, and just how frustrated you are, that others don't limit themselves to the same box you condemn yourself to.

You can't make a case, you can't provide links, you can't make a coherent argument. All you can do is demand everyone unconditionally and blindly, accept your authority on a topic.

Whoever is supposed to be hiding it isn't doing a very good job. Were they incapable of copying a bit of normal "space" and imposing it over the anomalous image?

peacenik wrote: peacenik wrote:
Fixed it 4 ya

Fuck off Troll.......

My post BTW.
Forum software appears to have "logged me off" whilst I was preparing my post.....

Mars Base Thread here:

https://truth-zone.net/forum/news-and-current-affairs/69446-pictures-of-a-space-base-on-mars.html?limitstart=0#267956

Exorcist wrote:
If you sock up again i will punish you severely... date with pfiz... 1 hour dinner minimum.. no alcohol allowed, for you.

On a serious note i have very clear skies here, some say its some of the clearest at night in the world... i see satellites (or whatever they are) all the time... they move with a certain speed.

A short time back I observed a light moving at phenomenal speeds that some would liken to a 'UFO' ... except it travelled straight, like a sat, and was lit up white, like a sat ... all i can deduce was that it was a high altitude high speed plane of some kind.. no flashing lights, wasnt a passenger jet, i see those all the time also, day and night.

It moved from one side of the horizon to the other in less than a minute.. never seen anything like it. Appeared to be constant altitude.

novum wrote:
Eeeeeeeek!!!!

I'm begging you for a more lenient punishment. Would you consider reducing my sentence to one years solitary confinement, suspended in a cage in the Tower of London dungeon with no food or water?

Please have mercy!!!!

Anonymous wrote:
When it comes to making you look stupid, you need no help from anyone.

Baby batter is right, you jump threads for the sole purpose dramatizing your hate for anyone who doesn't roll over for you, You post on this forum just to spite others.

It would appear, sensible, civil, debate is not possible when exorcist is around? Anyone can tell exactly when this thread (and so many other threads) went sour. It's when exorcist posted to it.

Reply to novum (when quoting, the type screen on the mobile version corrupts; to do with the animated new banner?);

There are, according to the stories, two types of satellites:
1 - LEO satellites
2 - HEO satellites

2 are allegedly geostationary satellites that -by definition- don't move. 1 are the only type you would have seen. But how do you know those "moving lights in the sky" are man-made satellites? Can't they be natural satellites?

The only "source" for the status of those moving lights is the same people that have hoaxed Apollo, Mars landers, Challenger and much more. Why believe those people?

And if you do; how are these moving satel-lights propelled? What is the energy source to keep them in motion? How much of that energy source is on board? And how do these things survive the extreme conditions of -according to the model- 300C temps at one side and -270C tenperatures at ťhe other? Which material can withstand such extreme differences at the same time?