Carl Munck has created the science of "archaeocryptograpy" — a study of the underlying mathematical order beneath the proportions, size, and placement of the world's Sacred Sites.
But in order to follow Munck's arguments, we are first going to have to become aware of a way of looking at numbers that will seem quite foreign to most. Yet this approach to numbers is extremely familiar to anyone involved in cryptoanalysis: the breaking of codes!
Hidden Codes and the Prime Meridian
In breaking the mathematical codes that are hidden in Sacred Sites, Carl Munck found that two minor adjustments needed to be made to our modern way of reckoning. The first adjustment is to the length of the year, which has changed since the Great Pyramid was built. The number 365.020081, exact to all 6 decimal places, lies "buried" in many Sacred Sites. We'll see later on, in the body of his article, how that number fits in to some of Munck's calculations.
The main adjustment that concerns us for purposes of this article, however, is the location of the Prime Meridian. Today, we calculate longitude based upon vertical lines encircling the globe through the poles, assuming a total of 360 degrees for the entire planet, and with zero being at Greenwich, England. When we say that the time is 0800 hours Greenwich Mean Time, in other words, we mean that this is the time of day at a longitude of 0 degrees.
In order to "break the code" of the Sacred Sites, Munck found that it was first necessary to reckon longitude based not upon Greenwich but upon Giza in Egypt. In other words, instead of being at Greenwich, 0 degrees of longitude would be the location that runs through the Great Pyramid. That is the Prime Meridian for all Sacred Sites.
In "breaking the code," one number that Munck consistently finds "hidden" in Sacred Sites is derived by multiplying together the degrees, minutes, and seconds that represent the site's longitude relative to a Prime Meridian at Giza. So, for example, if a Sacred Site were found at a longitude of 49 degrees 1 minute 1 second away from Giza, we would expect to find the exact number 49 (49 x 1 x 1) "hidden" in the Sacred Site in some manner.
Finding Hidden Numbers
How do you "hide" a number in a Sacred Site? Well, for example in a stone circle at 49 degrees 1 minute 1 second of longitude, you might have 7 stones in a circle, with a stone in the center that is perfectly square: 7 squared = 49. A step pyramid at that longitude could be perfectly square at the base, with 7 tiers on each side.
This all may seem like stretching a point — until you realize that most sites have a longitude or latitude that can only be represented by very long numbers. For example, if you have a latitude of 25 degrees 07 minutes 29.62285728 seconds (north or south of the equator), the number you are working with, multiplied out, is 5184. If you find that by adding and/or multiplying various measurements in a pyramid at that exact latitude you can arrive at the number 5184, the probability of coincidence becomes mathematically negligible. If you also find that the longitude of this pyramid can be derived in like manner, it's even less likely that you are looking at something that occurred by chance.
Going further, what if you study upwards of 250 Sacred Sites and find that the longitude relative to Giza and the exact latitude are encoded into every single one? Even if there were only 10 sites involved, you would have ruled out coincidence. And Carl Munck has discovered that you can find the exact longitude relative to Giza and the latitude, down to several decimal places, encoded into every single one of the 250 Sacred Sites that he has studied!
In proving that the placement of the Sacred Sites he's studied could not have occurred by chance, Munck has also proved that the people who built them must have been able to view our planet from outer space! It would have been literally impossible for us, today, to verify the accuracy of these ancient builders' calculations before we ourselves had satellites!
So Munck is giving us proof that there was a much higher technology in ancient times than classical historians have assumed. Besides that, the overwhelming implication is that the Sacred Sites — at least the ones that Munck has visited — were planned and executed by the same mind or agency. They were all built according to a single plan.
But there's more!
Gemetria: The Hidden Power in Numbers
Gemetria survives today in the Kabbalah and its Western offshoot, the parascience of numerology.
We are most familiar perhaps with 666 – the Number of the Beast — a number that has traditionally been associated with the Antichrist of Revelations and Armageddon. The 666 is from the Kaballah, and although it can be reduced further, its primary meaning lies in the full 3-digit number.
In Hebrew, there are no vowels, so many words that seem quite different are numerically the same. For example, the word for king is the Hebrew MLCh, and the word for clown is ChML. So from the standpoint of Gemetria, a clown is the mirror-image of a king, and numerically, they are the same (570). (Shakespeare took this clown-king idea very seriously. In his plays, the fool and the king are often in many ways two facets of a single character. The fool stands for everything that the king knows "subconsciously" and does not want to admit or dare to speak.)
In numerology, the letters of a word are each represented by a single number from 1 to 9 (for our alphabet, A = 1, B = 2, . . . after I = 9, you start over again with J = 1, K = 2, etc.), and these numbers are added together until you arrive at a number from one to nine — unless you first arrive at 11 or 22, which are considered so powerful that you do not reduce them further.
Here's an example of numerology at work on the English-language version of the name Abraham. A = 1, B = 2, R = 9, H = 8, and M = 4. When you add up all the letters, you arrive at the number 28. Then, when you add together the digits in the number 28, you have 2 plus 8, or 10. The last step is to add 1 plus 0, which of course equals 1. And the number 1 is the beginning, the initiation, the origin of something, just as Abraham was the primogenitur of the Hebrew race. And before his name was Abraham, it was Abram, which reduces to a 9 — the last number in the cycle of creation — the Terminal Man. Notice also that "666" also reduces to a 9.
Coincidence? Perhaps. Nevertheless, the Ancients took these things very seriously, and it was the Ancients who built the pyramids. And although we have only one example of Gemetria in the article below, Carl Munck has found that its principles, like the exact placement of each site, pervade the encoding of all the Sacred Sites he's studied.
And all of this information applies only to what Munck calls "Code-1" — using numbers in a two-dimensional matrix. He also refers below to another entirely new set of numbers derived from his not-yet-published work — numbers that take off into the third dimension of sines, cosines, and tangents!
www.spiritofmaat.com/archive/nov2/munck.htm