Suckers. The "Holocaust" is a hoax. Deal with it

[cultsmasher]

I did a thread like this in the old TZ. But I figured it could use a refresh in the new TZ. To start out, I will show you two plaques. The old one used to be at the holocaust memorial museum in Auschwitz. It says 4 million people were murdered there. But then Poland gained its freedom from Russia. So they put up a new plaque there that is a tiny bit closer to the truth. It says that 1.5 million people died there. Keep in mind that Auschwitz was said to have been the worst of the worst "death camp." So if the deaths were that much lower at Auschwitz, you can bet your ass that they were equally as low at all of the other jewish internment camps. ("Death Camps") So where does that put the figure of 6 million jews supposedly being killed in the holocaust.

Next, I will show you a couple of documents from the International Red Cross. They say what the actual number of deaths were at various jewish internment camps. Why are they so low? Because there were no gas chambers. Neither were any jews turned into soap. Nor was there a lampshade made out of jew skin. Etc. etc. etc.

I will next show you a number of newspaper articles that appeared in various newspapers long before WW II. They all speak of something bad happening to 6 million jews. You would have to be a sucker of suckers to believe the same sort of crap in regards to the holocaust.

Next I will show you a couple pictures of a swimming pool they had for inmates at Auschwitz. What were the Nazis trying to do. Genocide them with recreational activities?

 

[Truthspoon]

That's something I have to give credit to this forum for....

It was the work by the people here who woke me up to the holohoax..... I followed a few of the crumbs left here and now I know the truth......

Also my opinion of the 'allies' and Churchill has been completely reversed, and although he is seen as the greatest Briton and the man who preserved our so called 'free world', the truth is he is the one man who has done the most to totally destroy it.

I wonder whether Churchill knew how badly he had fucked up........ it was obvious he loved Jews and owed them everything.. but did he really know how badly he was selling out his own people, his country and Western civilisation as a whole....

Maybe that's why the old cunt was permanently pissed.....

 

[cultsmasher]

That's something I have to give credit to this forum for....

It was the work by the people here who woke me up to the holohoax..... I followed a few of the crumbs left here and now I know the truth......

Also my opinion of the 'allies' and Churchill has been completely reversed, and although he is seen as the greatest Briton and the man who preserved our so called 'free world', the truth is he is the one man who has done the most to totally destroy it.

I wonder whether Churchill knew how badly he had fucked up........ it was obvious he loved Jews and owed them everything.. but did he really know how badly he was selling out his own people, his country and Western civilisation as a whole....

Maybe that's why the old cunt was permanently pissed.....

I think treasonous scum know very well that they're treasonous scum. But to them, being that way isn't fucking up. Who knows what the criminally insane may come up with to justify their actions. It's probably pretty much the same as the justifications people like members of the mafia may come up with to justify their criminality.

 

[Frothy]

At O/P, why is the headline on this document written in English? Seems to me it's been tampered with by a holocaust denier and wasn't a Red Cross docuement.

 

[cultsmasher]

At O/P, why is the headline on this document written in English? Seems to me it's been tampered with by a holocaust denier and wasn't a Red Cross docuement.

Don't believe it? Look it up for yourself. I did.

 

[Frothy]

Don't believe it? Look it up for yourself. I did.

I did look it up a few years ago, and concluded that it's an article from a booket that someone has falsey attributed to the Red Cross by inserting the headline in English language. Maybe you should remove it from your post because it just makes it look like your information is poorly reseached.

 

[Frothy]

Now onto your other docuement to the same effect.

It can clearly be seen at the bottom just above the stamp mark the docuement has been spliced, so what's missing from it, let's see;

Transated in English the underlined paragraph (missing from your document with an obvious cut line) it says;

"The documented numbers of the Sonderstandesamt [Bad Arolsen] do not allow for any conclusions to be made over the actual number of dead in the concentration camps."

So that's two badly researched docuements in your OP. How do you like having your cult smashed?

 

[cultsmasher]

I did look it up a few years ago, and concluded that it's an article from a booket that someone has falsey attributed to the Red Cross by inserting the headline in English language. Maybe you should remove it from your post because it just makes it look like your information is poorly reseached.

So, they got somebody from the Red Cross to deny it. What a surprise! And what a load of bullshit. There are so many other examples of the lies about the holocaust that almost certainly the Red Cross documents are real. Neither do I believe the bullshit about the Red Cross not being allowed into the concentration camps. Why wouldn't they. Because they may have found evidence of gas chambers that didn't exist?

 

[cultsmasher]

Now onto your other docuement to the same effect.

It can clearly be seen at the bottom just above the stamp mark the docuement has been spliced, so what's missing from it, let's see;

Transated in English the underlined paragraph (missing from your document with an obvious cut line) it says;

"The documented numbers of the Sonderstandesamt [Bad Arolsen] do not allow for any conclusions to be made over the actual number of dead in the concentration camps."

So that's two badly researched docuements in your OP. How do you like having your cult smashed?

I know from the splice that something had been edited out. Something meaningless. Which turned out to be the case. The numbers shown are what they are. Which given the FACT that there were no gas chambers is easy enough to believe. Also, if you can't make any conclusions from the numbers, what can you draw conclusions from. History written by the victors? That's always been a joke.

 

[Frothy]

Which given the FACT that there were no gas chambers is easy enough to believe.

I didn't see that ''FACT'' in your opening post. Consisely what evidence do you use to support it without referring to spliced, falsely attributed documents, newspaper clippings about Jews, or any other holocaust denier's propaganda?

 

[cultsmasher]

I didn't see that ''FACT'' in your opening post. Consisely what evidence do you use to support it without referring to spliced, falsely attributed documents, newspaper clippings about Jews, or any other holocaust denier's propaganda?

In this thread I said there were no gas chambers. Now you want me to prove it? That is a whole different can of worms. The evidence I did give in my thread should have been good enough. As for the numbers given in the Red Cross documents, why are they there if whoever created the documents didn't think they were accurate. At least that's what you say the edited out but underlined statement in the full page says in German. But I don't speak German. You also said that those documents were falsely attributed to the Red Cross. Well then, who do you think made them. And why.

But despite the cult you are trying to indoctrinate me into, what I showed was real. You don't like the Red Cross documents? Fine. That doesn't diminish everything else I showed. You know, it's too bad that this forum decided to start a new one. Because in the old one there was quite a lively and in depth debate going on about the matter. As to the gas chambers, it will take you about 45 minutes to learn some of the real truth. In the form of three 15 minute long videos. Are you up to it? In case you are, here are the videos.

https://www.100free.com/view?v=1193971518

https://www.100free.com/view?v=3638970855

https://www.100free.com/view?v=1672941237

 

[Frothy]

In this thread I said there were no gas chambers. Now you want me to prove it? That is a whole different can of worms. The evidence I did give in my thread should have been good enough. As for the numbers given in the Red Cross documents, why are they there if whoever created the documents didn't think they were accurate. At least that's what you say the edited out but underlined statement in the full page says in German. But I don't speak German. You also said that those documents were falsely attributed to the Red Cross. Well then, who do you think made them. And why.

But despite the cult you are trying to indoctrinate me into, what I showed was real. You don't like the Red Cross documents? Fine. That doesn't diminish everything else I showed. You know, it's too bad that this forum decided to start a new one. Because in the old one there was quite a lively and in depth debate going on about the matter. As to the gas chambers, it will take you about 45 minutes to learn some of the real truth. In the form of three 15 minute long videos. Are you up to it? In case you are, here are the videos.

https://www.100free.com/view?v=1193971518

https://www.100free.com/view?v=3638970855

https://www.100free.com/view?v=1672941237

Okay so you think the Red Cross documents that you posted are real, even though the Red Cross themselves have said they're not, thus you think the Red Cross are lying. All else you've showed are newspaper clippings about Jews etc, and the alteration to the plaque, and a swimming pool used by the guards and some privillaged prisoners.

Nothing you have posted in this thread negates the existance of the gas chambers, it's as though you've just decided so.

I also suspect you think that all the WW2 nazis were lying under duress when they gave their evidence about the gas chambers blah blah blah....

Anyway you carry on carrying on, I've tried to help you but you're stuck in your ways.

No wonder the forum is a graveyard.

 

[Martin Timothy]

The push to declare the Holocaust a "lie" is to downplay the Jewish role .. get it well understood Adolf Hitler and all of the top Nazis were Jews, the non Jewish Nazis Ernst Röhm and the SA were slaughtered in the Night of the Long Knives massacres of June 1934, after H was sworn in as German Chancellor Jan. 30, 1933.

Eisenhower's Rhine Meadows Death Camps.
11 Million Germans Were Murdered After WWII.
BBC - Genocide of 12 Million Germans After WW2.
9-15 Million Germans Killed Post WW2 1945 – 1953.
Post WW2 Jews Murdered Poles & Took Power in Poland.
The Real Holocaust of WW2 – 15 Million Germans Slaughtered.
Genocide of the Ethnic Germans in Jugoslavia 1944 – 1948 pdf.
Other Losses - The Genocide of 7m Germans, by James Bacque.
The Masses of Corpses at Dachau & Buchenwald Were Dead German Soldiers.

Jews perpetrated genocide upon the German ppl not the other way around.

The Holocaust was a Zionist plot to eliminate those Jews who remained true to the Divine Covenant, by which Allah assures Jews the Messiah will appear, whose purpose will be to restore the fortunes of the Jewish people and to establish the nation state of Israel, it exhorts them to patience until that time comes.

In the video Danger Zone for Trucks in Czech Republic, driver Harry Stam takes us thru deserted towns and villages we say the former inhabitants of which were the Sudetenland Germans, whose ancestors had been sent there by usurper Catherine the Great in the 18th Century, who were with the Volga Germans, other pockets of relocated Germans in Poland and the Gypsy ppl the principle victims of the H'caust.

This model does not deny Jews were gassed .. it relies on the testimony of former WW2 RAAF Bomber Pilot Moshe Dyan Kaplan who claims to be a Pharisee, who says his Amsterdam family emerged unscathed and that the Jews who were gassed were called "Cheesies," as well he gave to understand that as far as he was concerned they were neither missed nor mourned.

And that of Katherine Schweitzer the only survivor of a Jewish family of fourteen, arrested in Budapest in 1944 by a Jew member of Horsha the Hungarian thug police and deported to Auschwitz, who said in an interview with Australian 60 Minutes reporter Richard Carleton in the 1990's, the Jew who arrested her family was living a few doors up on the same street in Sydney.

Her murdered body was discovered in a wheely bin inside her high security Sydney apartment building December 28, 2006, four weeks after we put her story onto an email that went to every member of both houses of the Australian Federal Parliament and the Israeli Knesset, as well as to thousands of other e addresses world wide.

According to Alex Jones George Soros then in his teen years "cataloged" the possessions of Jews deported from Budapest at that time, we say he was "hands on" in her case.

Adolf Hitler's Jewish Ancestry.
Adolf Hitler Had Jewish & African Ancestors.

 

[cultsmasher]

Okay so you think the Red Cross documents that you posted are real, even though the Red Cross themselves have said they're not, thus you think the Red Cross are lying. All else you've showed are newspaper clippings about Jews etc, and the alteration to the plaque, and a swimming pool used by the guards and some privillaged prisoners.

Nothing you have posted in this thread negates the existance of the gas chambers, it's as though you've just decided so.

I also suspect you think that all the WW2 nazis were lying under duress when they gave their evidence about the gas chambers blah blah blah....

Anyway you carry on carrying on, I've tried to help you but you're stuck in your ways.

No wonder the forum is a graveyard.

Yeah, the Red Cross themselves denied that those documents weren't created by them. Refresh my memory. Who did they say created them. And why. Next, the newspaper clippings were real. If the 6 million number was bullshit long before WW II, what makes you think that it was true in regards to the holocaust. As for the swimming pool, how in the hell would you know who used it . I can tell you who probably didn't use it. Guards at the camp. They weren't being held there. No doubt if they wanted that kind of recreation, they could have gone out and found a much nicer place for it. Someplace where nature was providing the water. Such as a lake with a beach. Or possibly some resort at a fancy hotel.

As for the gas chambers, I posted 3 videos about it. Didn't you watch them? Though in the last one, it didn't speak of the gas chambers directly. The first part of it was about how the former commandant of Auschwitz was TORTURED into confessing. And if he was, no doubt others were as well. Then in the second part of it they actually interviewed people who were inmates in those camps! Ones who weren't lying. So before giving me any more shit, actually watch the videos. Then tell me your lies. Because right now I don't think you know you're lying.

 

[Frothy]

Yeah, the Red Cross themselves denied that those documents weren't created by them. Refresh my memory. Who did they say created them. And why. Next,

They didn't say who created them, they just said it wasn't them, and they've been falsely attributed to the Red Cross. It is a report penned by a denier (probably Richard Harwood, as this article is one of the chapters of the 1974 booklet: "Did Six Million Really Die?").

''.The pamphlet alleged, purportedly relying on a Red Cross report, that all concentration camps were really humane work camps. Mr. Biedermann, a delegate of the International Committee of the Red Cross, testified that the Red Cross Report pertained exclusively to prisoner of war camps as the Red Cross personnel had not been inside any camps in which civilians were detained. The Crown adduced evidence from Professor Hilberg that while some camps had labour facilities annexed to them, Belzec, Treblinka, Sobibor and Chelmno were exclusively "killing factories" and that gas chambers were in operation at Auschwitz-Birkenau and Majdanek. The numbers of Jews slaughtered was verifiable from railway records showing the payments per person made by the Gestapo for transport to the camps. These numbers were compared with those having left the camps or who were found there after liberation.On and on, the Crown showed that the appellant misrepresented the work of historians, misquoted witnesses, fabricated evidence, and cited non-existent authorities.[4]
Ultimately the Supreme Court concluded:''

Did Six Million Really Die?

Antisemitism Part of Jewish history

en-academic.com

Harwood also claimed that Die Tat, a Swiss tabloid newspaper, published statistics that concluded the number of people who died in Nazi prisons and camps from 1939 to 1945 based on ICRC statistics was "300,000, not all of whom were Jews".[44] The January 19, 1955 edition of Die Tat did indeed give a 300,000 figure, but this was only in reference to "Germans and German Jews" and not nationals of other countries.[45] In a 1979 response to this pamphlet, the ICRC said that they have "never tried to compile statistics on the victims of the war",[46] nor "certified the accuracy of the statistics produced by a third party",[46] and state that the authors of such material have "falsified" both claims that the document originates from the ICRC and refers exclusively to Jews.[46]

Criticism of Holocaust denial

criticizes claims to the effect that the genocide of Jews during World War II usually referred to as the Holocaust[1] did not occur in the manner or to the extent described by current scholarship. Key elements of such claims are the rejection of…

en-academic.com

 

[Frothy]

. Next, the newspaper clippings were real. If the 6 million number was bullshit long before WW II, what makes you think that it was true in regards to the holocaust.

I didn't say the newspaper clippings that you posted weren't real however they have been cherry picked to suit an agenda, let's see some other clippings with different figures shall we;

 

[Frothy]

Next the swimming pool.

''There was a swimming pool in Auschwitz, hence it could not have been an extermination camp.

Indeed, a water reservoir in Auschwitz I (the main camp) was converted to a swimming pool which was used by the camp’s staff. Other means of entertainment for the SS personnel existed – a band composed of prisoners, and a brothel (which some prisoners were permitted to use). How this “proves” that Auschwitz was not an extermination center is beyond the author of this''

The Leuchter FAQ: Why would there be a swimming pool at a death camp - Nizkor

There was a swimming pool in Auschwitz, hence it could not have been an extermination camp. Indeed, a water reservoir in Auschwitz I (the main camp) was converted to a swimming pool which was used by the camp’s staff. Other means of entertainment for the SS personnel existed – a band composed of...

www.nizkor.org

 

[Frothy]

As for the vidoes posted, I'm not watching a narration on a video called ''Become_a_Holocaust_Denier_in_14_Minutes''

On to Hoss, his torture is hearsay, and even if it's true it doesn't mean he was fed a story, but his story is simialr to that of other witnesses.

Nothing you have posted proves that the gas chambers didn't really exist or weren't used to kill deportees to the camps as per the offical narrative. You're coming over as a conspiracy theorist, who has a set agenda, maybe you did become a holocaust denier after watching a video for 14 minutes.

Now tell me how many German soldiers from the WW2 era have denied the holocaust occured? And how many of them worked in any of the camps where the gassing occurred? I bet it will be difficult to even find one that supports your narrative.

Holocaust denial wasn't even a thing until the 1970s and there weren't laws against it before then.

 

[cultsmasher]

They didn't say who created them, they just said it wasn't them, and they've been falsely attributed to the Red Cross. It is a report penned by a denier (probably Richard Harwood, as this article is one of the chapters of the 1974 booklet: "Did Six Million Really Die?").

''.The pamphlet alleged, purportedly relying on a Red Cross report, that all concentration camps were really humane work camps. Mr. Biedermann, a delegate of the International Committee of the Red Cross, testified that the Red Cross Report pertained exclusively to prisoner of war camps as the Red Cross personnel had not been inside any camps in which civilians were detained. The Crown adduced evidence from Professor Hilberg that while some camps had labour facilities annexed to them, Belzec, Treblinka, Sobibor and Chelmno were exclusively "killing factories" and that gas chambers were in operation at Auschwitz-Birkenau and Majdanek. The numbers of Jews slaughtered was verifiable from railway records showing the payments per person made by the Gestapo for transport to the camps. These numbers were compared with those having left the camps or who were found there after liberation.On and on, the Crown showed that the appellant misrepresented the work of historians, misquoted witnesses, fabricated evidence, and cited non-existent authorities.[4]
Ultimately the Supreme Court concluded:''

Did Six Million Really Die?

Antisemitism Part of Jewish history

en-academic.com

Harwood also claimed that Die Tat, a Swiss tabloid newspaper, published statistics that concluded the number of people who died in Nazi prisons and camps from 1939 to 1945 based on ICRC statistics was "300,000, not all of whom were Jews".[44] The January 19, 1955 edition of Die Tat did indeed give a 300,000 figure, but this was only in reference to "Germans and German Jews" and not nationals of other countries.[45] In a 1979 response to this pamphlet, the ICRC said that they have "never tried to compile statistics on the victims of the war",[46] nor "certified the accuracy of the statistics produced by a third party",[46] and state that the authors of such material have "falsified" both claims that the document originates from the ICRC and refers exclusively to Jews.[46]

Criticism of Holocaust denial

criticizes claims to the effect that the genocide of Jews during World War II usually referred to as the Holocaust[1] did not occur in the manner or to the extent described by current scholarship. Key elements of such claims are the rejection of…

en-academic.com

As i said, I don't speak German. So there isn't a lot I can say about the documents. Other than that they look official. You also say that they were probably created by a holocaust denier named Richard Harwood. But you pointed out something in one of the documents that had been edited out. Something in German and underlined that you say said of the numbers shown, "that do not allow for any conclusions to be made over the actual number of dead." Why would a holocaust denier say such a thing.

 

[cultsmasher]

The push to declare the Holocaust a "lie" is to downplay the Jewish role .. get it well understood Adolf Hitler and all of the top Nazis were Jews, the non Jewish Nazis Ernst Röhm and the SA were slaughtered in the Night of the Long Knives massacres of June 1934, after H was sworn in as German Chancellor Jan. 30, 1933.

Eisenhower's Rhine Meadows Death Camps.
11 Million Germans Were Murdered After WWII.
BBC - Genocide of 12 Million Germans After WW2.
9-15 Million Germans Killed Post WW2 1945 – 1953.
Post WW2 Jews Murdered Poles & Took Power in Poland.
The Real Holocaust of WW2 – 15 Million Germans Slaughtered.
Genocide of the Ethnic Germans in Jugoslavia 1944 – 1948 pdf.
Other Losses - The Genocide of 7m Germans, by James Bacque.
The Masses of Corpses at Dachau & Buchenwald Were Dead German Soldiers.

Jews perpetrated genocide upon the German ppl not the other way around.

The Holocaust was a Zionist plot to eliminate those Jews who remained true to the Divine Covenant, by which Allah assures Jews the Messiah will appear, whose purpose will be to restore the fortunes of the Jewish people and to establish the nation state of Israel, it exhorts them to patience until that time comes.

In the video Danger Zone for Trucks in Czech Republic, driver Harry Stam takes us thru deserted towns and villages we say the former inhabitants of which were the Sudetenland Germans, whose ancestors had been sent there by usurper Catherine the Great in the 18th Century, who were with the Volga Germans, other pockets of relocated Germans in Poland and the Gypsy ppl the principle victims of the H'caust.

This model does not deny Jews were gassed .. it relies on the testimony of former WW2 RAAF Bomber Pilot Moshe Dyan Kaplan who claims to be a Pharisee, who says his Amsterdam family emerged unscathed and that the Jews who were gassed were called "Cheesies," as well he gave to understand that as far as he was concerned they were neither missed nor mourned.

And that of Katherine Schweitzer the only survivor of a Jewish family of fourteen, arrested in Budapest in 1944 by a Jew member of Horsha the Hungarian thug police and deported to Auschwitz, who said in an interview with Australian 60 Minutes reporter Richard Carleton in the 1990's, the Jew who arrested her family was living a few doors up on the same street in Sydney.

Her murdered body was discovered in a wheely bin inside her high security Sydney apartment building December 28, 2006, four weeks after we put her story onto an email that went to every member of both houses of the Australian Federal Parliament and the Israeli Knesset, as well as to thousands of other e addresses world wide.

According to Alex Jones George Soros then in his teen years "cataloged" the possessions of Jews deported from Budapest at that time, we say he was "hands on" in her case.

Adolf Hitler's Jewish Ancestry.
Adolf Hitler Had Jewish & African Ancestors.

I don't believe for a minute that Hitler was jewish. if he was, he wouldn't have deported most of them from Germany. Or put non German jews into jewish internment camps in areas taken over by the Germans.