Flat Earth or Globe Earth ?
- Thread starter WhiteKingWins
- Start date
Cactus
Active member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2022
- Messages
- 308
- Reaction score
- 41
- Points
- 28
With Admiral Byrd's suggestion of land beyond the poles and the notiion of a flat plane that would be infinitely wide and infinitely deep we are confronted with a very distinct possibility that a human extinction event can never be accomplished. Erasing humanity is a spheroid's fantasy and fear.
Cactus
Active member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2022
- Messages
- 308
- Reaction score
- 41
- Points
- 28
Claims are circulating that when they discovered the dome they fired atomic bombs at it to punch a hole in whatever the material is.
First thing to note is the total absence of concern about what might lie beyond the barrier. Punching holes could prove catastrophic but those circulating this rediculous story are not bothered by such discrepancies.
The way I see it the rockets were sounding devices made to explode a charge of explosive and the shockwave propagation is measured and analyzed to try and establish it's consistancy.
They had discovered the barrier. They probed it.
First thing to note is the total absence of concern about what might lie beyond the barrier. Punching holes could prove catastrophic but those circulating this rediculous story are not bothered by such discrepancies.
The way I see it the rockets were sounding devices made to explode a charge of explosive and the shockwave propagation is measured and analyzed to try and establish it's consistancy.
They had discovered the barrier. They probed it.
Cactus
Active member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2022
- Messages
- 308
- Reaction score
- 41
- Points
- 28
So, if those astronauts were not re-entering from space, where were they coming from?
The re-entry capsule is scorched at some undisclosed location to create the illusion of a re-entry from outer space then it and the astronauts inside the capsule are loaded onto a high altitude cargo plane from which it will be dropped.
Certainly explains why they never felt the need to protect the nylon re-entry parachutes from re-entry heat at the nosecone area.
The parachutes did not melt into useless clumps of nylon because there was no re-entry.
The re-entry capsule is scorched at some undisclosed location to create the illusion of a re-entry from outer space then it and the astronauts inside the capsule are loaded onto a high altitude cargo plane from which it will be dropped.
Certainly explains why they never felt the need to protect the nylon re-entry parachutes from re-entry heat at the nosecone area.
The parachutes did not melt into useless clumps of nylon because there was no re-entry.
Last edited:
Cactus
Active member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2022
- Messages
- 308
- Reaction score
- 41
- Points
- 28
Gemini astronauts splashing down after weeks of weightlessness in a cramped capsule. The recovery team pick them up and helo them to the deck of the assigned aircraft carrier.
The helicopter landed on the deck and a wheeled stairway was fastened to the door and the returning astronauts emerged and waltzed down those stairs and marched across the deck as if they spent the last weeks at Gold's Gym not in a cramped capsule in weightlessness.
Make the big lie simple and repeat it over and over. It's simplicity, rife with elementary physics denials, is it's downfall.
How can they produce an image of earth from space if all the evidence says they never went?
Overwhelming evidence I might add.
The helicopter landed on the deck and a wheeled stairway was fastened to the door and the returning astronauts emerged and waltzed down those stairs and marched across the deck as if they spent the last weeks at Gold's Gym not in a cramped capsule in weightlessness.
Make the big lie simple and repeat it over and over. It's simplicity, rife with elementary physics denials, is it's downfall.
How can they produce an image of earth from space if all the evidence says they never went?
Overwhelming evidence I might add.
Cactus
Active member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2022
- Messages
- 308
- Reaction score
- 41
- Points
- 28
4500 images taken on the moon by the visting astronauts. Each image is devoid of the slightest glimmer of a star. The public paid the bill anyways.
This just to illustrate the lowest level of evidence required to deplete treasuries of trillions.
Astronauts never examined by independent polygraph examiners yet the treasury doors containing the fruits of the working man's labours are swung wide open and a clear unobstructed path in and out is also assured.
People simply don't protect their treasuries from world-class grifters and conmen bred from many generations of such. People that pay for it are spit on if they dare insist on proof from these liars and cheats. People get nothing in return for all that treasure. Just smoke and mirrors.
This just to illustrate the lowest level of evidence required to deplete treasuries of trillions.
Astronauts never examined by independent polygraph examiners yet the treasury doors containing the fruits of the working man's labours are swung wide open and a clear unobstructed path in and out is also assured.
People simply don't protect their treasuries from world-class grifters and conmen bred from many generations of such. People that pay for it are spit on if they dare insist on proof from these liars and cheats. People get nothing in return for all that treasure. Just smoke and mirrors.
Cactus
Active member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2022
- Messages
- 308
- Reaction score
- 41
- Points
- 28
The Soviet Buran space shuttle was remote controlled. It's unique flight was unmanned and the craft was retired after.
Interesting how the U.S. forgot to mention they had the ability to launch unmanned.
All shuttle flights were unmanned and landed in some undisclosed location ( perhaps Easter Island) not outer space.
Challenger disaster was unmanned. It was staged at a time when storing radioactive waste in space was considered.
Challenger muted that crowd fast. Hilarious the idea of disposing of hoax waste by sending it to an outer space no one was visiting. One hoax the crutch for another.
Interesting how the U.S. forgot to mention they had the ability to launch unmanned.
All shuttle flights were unmanned and landed in some undisclosed location ( perhaps Easter Island) not outer space.
Challenger disaster was unmanned. It was staged at a time when storing radioactive waste in space was considered.
Challenger muted that crowd fast. Hilarious the idea of disposing of hoax waste by sending it to an outer space no one was visiting. One hoax the crutch for another.
Cactus
Active member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2022
- Messages
- 308
- Reaction score
- 41
- Points
- 28
As incredible as it may seem to some, a claim was made that they could not go back to the moon necause they lost the plans.
Funny how it goes with NASA plans. Nixon ordered the specs to the moon lander, boxes and boxes of it, destroyed saying they had no space for them. They never even asked the Smithsonian.
NASA beta tape and vhs tape records....erased. just like grifters to clean up after themselves. Out of sight out of mind.
Funny how it goes with NASA plans. Nixon ordered the specs to the moon lander, boxes and boxes of it, destroyed saying they had no space for them. They never even asked the Smithsonian.
NASA beta tape and vhs tape records....erased. just like grifters to clean up after themselves. Out of sight out of mind.
Cactus
Active member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2022
- Messages
- 308
- Reaction score
- 41
- Points
- 28
The Soviet manned moon mission that never got off the ground had many similar features like the command module and lander were basically the same.
We assume that the Soviets, practically minded as they are, would make the mission as economical on electricity consumption and oxygen consumption and weight, water.
One interesting difference is that only one Soviet astronaut would walk the moon while the other orbits above.
Only two astronauts and the transition from command module to LEM, in the Soviet model, required a space walk. At least they remembered the parachutes.
Meaning that if we see the Soviet model as more realistic on resources we can only see the third capsule occupant in the Apollo model as a tell that they were not economy minded because they were not going anywhere.
If the parachutes are really installed there is no room for a crawlspace between the LEM and control module. The Soviets considered that but the U.S. got creative with their plans for an imaginary moonshot. By showing off to the Soviets they were giving away the scam.
The Soviet branch of Spheroids-are-Us drained the treasuries there very efficiently using these outer space fallacies.
We assume that the Soviets, practically minded as they are, would make the mission as economical on electricity consumption and oxygen consumption and weight, water.
One interesting difference is that only one Soviet astronaut would walk the moon while the other orbits above.
Only two astronauts and the transition from command module to LEM, in the Soviet model, required a space walk. At least they remembered the parachutes.
Meaning that if we see the Soviet model as more realistic on resources we can only see the third capsule occupant in the Apollo model as a tell that they were not economy minded because they were not going anywhere.
If the parachutes are really installed there is no room for a crawlspace between the LEM and control module. The Soviets considered that but the U.S. got creative with their plans for an imaginary moonshot. By showing off to the Soviets they were giving away the scam.
The Soviet branch of Spheroids-are-Us drained the treasuries there very efficiently using these outer space fallacies.
Cactus
Active member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2022
- Messages
- 308
- Reaction score
- 41
- Points
- 28
The Atomic Cowboys, as they were called, were the voices calling for a nuclear bomb to be exploded on the moon. Sounds plenty sensible to everyone and not the least because that would shut up the atomic denials and moon exploit critics.
To fake an atom bomb blast on the moon with tnt would be too heavy so basically a violent explosion and bright flash on the moon seen by billions on earth would attest that atom bombs exist and they work.
The blast would also provide irrefutable evidence they can go there.
The party ended with superpowers signing non space proliferation of atomic weapons.
This said, any mission to the moon could have installed a pyrotechnic show for us back here. That they invariable failed, all nations involved, to leave that kind of evidence on the moon tells a lot.
They conquer the moon and fail to install a military presence. That must be a human precedent.
To fake an atom bomb blast on the moon with tnt would be too heavy so basically a violent explosion and bright flash on the moon seen by billions on earth would attest that atom bombs exist and they work.
The blast would also provide irrefutable evidence they can go there.
The party ended with superpowers signing non space proliferation of atomic weapons.
This said, any mission to the moon could have installed a pyrotechnic show for us back here. That they invariable failed, all nations involved, to leave that kind of evidence on the moon tells a lot.
They conquer the moon and fail to install a military presence. That must be a human precedent.
Cactus
Active member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2022
- Messages
- 308
- Reaction score
- 41
- Points
- 28
The simple fact about satellites is that they were never required to start with. Continents have been linked up by submarine communications cabling for a long time. Predating any satellite claims.
Every day 800 balloon launches are performed worldwide for weather forcasting and atmospheric data for predictions and statistical analysis. Why would these even be required if all those hugely expensive satellites are up there?
The satellite hoax is another major shameless cashcow creating the fiction of a spheric world.
Picture in your mind the submarine cable networks uniting the continents on the flat earth map. Hardly any of it needs to be submerged;
The cabling layout is far more practical when overlayed on a azimuthal equidistant projection. Can't find one to show. If I have time I will produce such a flat earth map showing these submarine cables transposed. The volcanic zone defined by the arc of fire is more like a straight line than a horseshoe.
Last edited:
Exorcist
Member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2014
- Messages
- 14
- Reaction score
- 7
- Points
- 3
Truthspoon said (in RED TEXT}
Here's another example of Dubay's bullshit:
72 “October 16, 1854 the Times newspaper reported the Queen’s visit to Great Grimsby from Hull recording they were able to see the 300 foot tall dock tower from 70 miles away. On a ball-Earth 25,000 miles in circumference, factoring their 10 foot elevation above the water and the tower’s 300 foot height, at 70 miles away the dock tower should have remained an entire 2,600 feet below the horizon.”
The problem with this is that Grimsby and its dock tower is NOT 70 miles away from Hull by line of sight but only 14 miles away.
My reply in ( BLACK TEXT)
Cactus and Eric Dubay are pushing Flat Earth Bull$hit. They appear to have no knowledge of Atmospheric Physics. The perceived height of a distant tall object can be altered by atmospheric refraction due to height variations in the atmosphere's density. The resulting refraction bends light waves and causes the object to appear higher or lower depending on the temperature conditions.
1) In desert conditions the earth's surface is hot. The temperature of the air at the desert surface is hot (air less dense}. As the height increases above the surface the air gradually cools (air more dense). This change in air density causes refraction to bend the light waves producing mirages and make distant objects appear lower than they actually are. This effect is known as The Inferior Image Model.
2) In Winter condition nearer the poles eg Grimsby in late October 1854 the surface would have been cold. However the atmosphere a few miles above the surface could have been subject to the Gulf Stream moving warm air from the equator. The temperature of the air at the Grimsby land surface would have been cold (air more dense). As the height increases above the surface the air temperature would increase in the gulf stream (warmer air less dense).
This causes an opposite effect to that shown in example 1) above. This opposite change in air density causes refraction to bend the light downwards making distant objects appear higher than they actually are. This is called The Superior Image Model.
See diagrams illustrating the concept at the following link:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/atmos/mirage.html
Here's another example of Dubay's bullshit:
72 “October 16, 1854 the Times newspaper reported the Queen’s visit to Great Grimsby from Hull recording they were able to see the 300 foot tall dock tower from 70 miles away. On a ball-Earth 25,000 miles in circumference, factoring their 10 foot elevation above the water and the tower’s 300 foot height, at 70 miles away the dock tower should have remained an entire 2,600 feet below the horizon.”
The problem with this is that Grimsby and its dock tower is NOT 70 miles away from Hull by line of sight but only 14 miles away.
My reply in ( BLACK TEXT)
Cactus and Eric Dubay are pushing Flat Earth Bull$hit. They appear to have no knowledge of Atmospheric Physics. The perceived height of a distant tall object can be altered by atmospheric refraction due to height variations in the atmosphere's density. The resulting refraction bends light waves and causes the object to appear higher or lower depending on the temperature conditions.
1) In desert conditions the earth's surface is hot. The temperature of the air at the desert surface is hot (air less dense}. As the height increases above the surface the air gradually cools (air more dense). This change in air density causes refraction to bend the light waves producing mirages and make distant objects appear lower than they actually are. This effect is known as The Inferior Image Model.
2) In Winter condition nearer the poles eg Grimsby in late October 1854 the surface would have been cold. However the atmosphere a few miles above the surface could have been subject to the Gulf Stream moving warm air from the equator. The temperature of the air at the Grimsby land surface would have been cold (air more dense). As the height increases above the surface the air temperature would increase in the gulf stream (warmer air less dense).
This causes an opposite effect to that shown in example 1) above. This opposite change in air density causes refraction to bend the light downwards making distant objects appear higher than they actually are. This is called The Superior Image Model.
See diagrams illustrating the concept at the following link:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/atmos/mirage.html
Last edited: