Firestarter
Member
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2022
- Messages
- 65
- Reaction score
- 24
- Points
- 8
H.G. Wells, head of British foreign intelligence during WW I, was a founding member of the Milner Round Table, and tutored Aldous and Julian Huxley at Oxford. It was also Wells who introduced the brothers Huxley to Aleister Crowley during the late 1920s.
In 1921, Buchman with Lord Arthur Balfour and H.G. Wells founded the “pacifist” Moral Re-Armament to implement Wells’ “The open conspiracy” (read the book!).
In this book Wells outlines a Utopia complete with getting rid off excess population in the “New Republic”; that both “modern science” and the new “religion” are closely associated with war; and the creation of the new “world state” (UN?).
See the following 2 excerpts:
H.G. Wells – The Open Conspiracy (1928): http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks13/1303661h.html
In 1921, Buchman with Lord Arthur Balfour and H.G. Wells founded the “pacifist” Moral Re-Armament to implement Wells’ “The open conspiracy” (read the book!).
In this book Wells outlines a Utopia complete with getting rid off excess population in the “New Republic”; that both “modern science” and the new “religion” are closely associated with war; and the creation of the new “world state” (UN?).
See the following 2 excerpts:
.Manifestly the supreme direction of the complex of human economic activities in such a world must centre upon a bureau of information and advice, which will take account of all the resources of the planet, estimate current needs, apportion productive activities and control distribution. The topographical and geological surveys of modern civilized communities, their government maps, their periodic issue of agricultural and industrial statistics, are the first crude and unco-ordinated beginnings of such an economic world intelligence. In the propaganda work of David Lubin, a pioneer whom mankind must not forget, and in his International Institute of Agriculture in Rome, there were the beginnings of an impartial review month by month and year by year of world production, world needs and world transport. Such a great central organization of economic science would necessarily produce direction; it would indicate what had best be done here, there, and everywhere, solve general tangles, examine, approve and initiate fresh methods and arrange the transitional process from old to new. It would not be an organization of will, imposing its will upon a reluctant or recalcitrant race; it would be a direction, just as a map is a direction.
(...)
(1) The complete assertion, practical as well as theoretical, of the provisional nature of existing governments and of our acquiescence in them;
(2) The resolve to minimize by all available means the conflicts of these governments, their militant use of individuals and property, and their interferences with the establishment of a world economic system;
(3) The determination to replace private, local or national ownership of at least credit, transport, and staple production by a responsible world directorate serving the common ends of the race;
(4) The practical recognition of the necessity for world biological controls, for example, of population and disease;
(5) The support of a minimum standard of individual freedom and welfare in the world; and
(6) The supreme duty of subordinating the personal career to the creation of a world directorate capable of these tasks and to the general advancement of human knowledge, capacity, and power;
(7) The admission therewith that our immortality is conditional and lies in the race and not in our individual selves.
H.G. Wells – The Open Conspiracy (1928): http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks13/1303661h.html